Slashdot Mirror


Total Information Awareness, For One

Jason writes "This guy has created his own TIA program for his electronic transactions around DC. He writes, 'Conceptually, I decided to create a personal TIA program to track my own electronic movements... and to document every single electronically-recorded transaction I've made.' A small vignette into what could be done with your electronic droppings."

42 of 197 comments (clear)

  1. doesn't seem all that TIA... by rumpledstiltskin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    looks like he just took quicken or MS money or some equivalent application and added addresses and posted the locations on a map. This doesn't seem to be nearly the scope of ashcroft's wet dream come true (TIA).

    1. Re:doesn't seem all that TIA... by guardian-ct · · Score: 5, Informative

      Click on the "Click for PNG link".
      Then click on some of the icons on his map. It's more involved than you think. Scanned receipts from that location, including what was purchased, and how much he paid for it. It's not just a map, and it certainly wasn't generated by Quicken or MS Money, unless those two programs have gotten significantly more powerful than I thought.

    2. Re:doesn't seem all that TIA... by jea6 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really because he also saved his receipts and scanned those in. So it was slightly more work. It's also interesting to try this on yourself, not from a GIS perspective but to try and account for where you spend money or how often.

      I tried to manage my money by tracking where I spent money and over the course of a month I'd racked up around 50 different vendors. After six months (had I kept it up) I could probably go to the Brickskeller (like this guy did) and open a corporate account with a 10% discount based on volume.

      It may not be TIA but it was more work than your passing glance gathered.

      --

      sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.
    3. Re:doesn't seem all that TIA... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you missed the point. OF COURSE, big government would be able to create more detailed maps and logs of our activities. The question is: would you want them to be able to do even the little he showed us? Take that map and add a few thousand more data points, add in the locations and times of all your cellular phone calls and see just how private you feel. And further suppose that some spook analyst (or government supercomputer) somewhere takes a personal interest in you (for whatever reason) and requests that a GPS device be attached to your car. Now that map shows everywhere you went, and with all the financial data they'll pretty much know what you did. I dunno ... that map looks kinda scary to me.

      Makes me wonder when the Feds will mandate GPS tracking devices be installed on all cars. Needn't even be a remotely-addressable real-time device either. Just a simple, cheap receiver with enough memory to log the last couple of weeks of your travels. A cop, agent, whatever just walks up to your car with a hand-held reader and downloads the data.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    4. Re:doesn't seem all that TIA... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ahem.

      It would protect me in the long run if ever I did get accused of something I didn't do.

      Throw the teddy bear away and WAKE UP. The Law is only as good as those that enforce it. It's time you woke up to the fact that those in charge of that important function may no longer be our friends. And you obviously haven't the slightest idea what it means to be merely accused of a serious crime. Being so accused is, in itself, a punitive activity nowadays. Your life will never be the same, even if you are ultimately vindicated. I have enough attorneys in my family to have some understanding of what it is like to be run through the Justice system. You don't want that to happen to you or anyone you care about. Invasive, error-prone systems like TIA may, or may not, serve their stated function of deterring terrorism. What they will do is increase the number of individuals who, through no fault of their own, are put through the wringer.

      I have nothing to hide. I follow the law.

      So do I. That's my choice. And I expect to be left alone, without experiencing any undue scrutiny or privacy violations, until I do perform some illegal activity. I see no reason to allow the government to presume that I (and you, or you) might someday exhibit criminal behavior and to justify monitoring our daily activities because of that presumption, and to further log that activity until they decide it is no longer useful. Do not make the mistake (as so many before us have) of assuming that the government has no interest in you. If they didn't have that interest, they wouldn't want TIA.

      Look at history. Every time a government has told its citizens, "Yes, we are assuming excessive powers that we cannot reasonably justify but, hey, don't worry ... if you have nothing to hide you have nothing to fear" bad things happened. It all hinges on who decides what is worth hiding. That is, in fact, the very time to start worrying.

      Now, I don't want to sound like some bleeding-heart liberal and I'm hardly defending terrorists, kidnappers or child molesters but the truth is that, in the United States, those people do have Constutionally-guaranteed rights. And why is that? Because it was always considered better to let a guilty man go free than to imprison an innocent one. And America is one of the few nations, to this very day, the still believes in this principle. At least, I hope we still do.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
    5. Re:doesn't seem all that TIA... by C10H14N2 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh I SEE... spends a lot of time hanging around Dupont Circle and Kalorama, frequents decidedly pedestrian restaurants, frequents 17th St, buys mango smoothies at Whole Foods, eats tofu bought in Chinatown, hangs out on in artsy-edgy 14th street clubs and coffeehouses... prefers mexican food and salsa dancing. Rounds tipped bills to the penny. Most importantly, never, EVER, for any reason, leaves Northwest.

      Houston, we have a profile.

  2. WHAT ARE YOU SUGGESTING?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    You seem to be suggesting that perhaps it is wrong for the US Government to operate a repressive and opressive system like the TIA. Well, you are entitled to your opinion. After all this is America. At the same time, this is America, so your implication is treasonous. Please remain seated until federal agents have come to a complete stop and John Ashcroft has arrived at your domicile.

  3. Welcome to the Global Village by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Where everyone knows all your secrets...

    When personal data is confidential, only governments and big business will have access to it. When personal data is public, even corrupt officials will be forced to behave.

    The genie is out of the bottle, and it seems that only laws to mandate total and full access to all data by anyone who wants it will protect us from those who would seek to use such power against us.

    Yes, I know it'd be a nightmare if anyone could monitor my phone records, but the nightmare could become quite fun if it went both ways.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Insightful
      When personal data is public, even corrupt officials will be forced to behave.



      Interesting assumption, but wrong... You assumed the corrupt officials will 1) allow their own CORRECT information to be made public, as opposed to cleaning it up first, and 2) that the public information released on you is actually true, and not replaced with previously mentioned corrupt official's info...

    2. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by heironymouscoward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      All data is suspect, but data that is kept secret is most suspect.

      By mandating total transparency of data, the community can actually act to verify and "clean" it. Think of reputation management systems. Think of journalists: professional reputation managers, to some extent.

      It would change the world we live in, but the only alternative I see is more of what we have today, namely data as a weapon of oppression and exploitation for those with sufficient money and power.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une signature
    3. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by Kehl · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To start, I would like to give the author credit presenting his case (notably the .png images)

      However I cannot really grasp the concept of what he is trying to get across. I could draw a map of all the digital (non cash tranactions) I have made in the past week, or I am likely to make next week.

      If this is a paranoia issue then why use digital money transfers / store cards? OK the ATM/POS transefers will still be logged (cash withdrawls) and so will the video evidence that you used them.

      However add to the map all of the other tracking points you may have triggered .....

      Digital Transactions - As allready mentioned
      Road Traffic Cameras - These monitor road tax offences as well as driving offences
      Security Cameras
      Internet Habbits
      EMail Content
      Mobile Phone's Triangulated Geograpic Location (I can pinpoint this to approx 1 square mile using cell ID's)

      Then you will have an even larger picture of your daily routine;

      Ok so UK Resident #5637463 (Me)

      Passes 4 road traffic cameras on route to work.
      Works 8:30 -> 16:30 weekdays (Location found easily by a call to the UK's tax offices)
      Buys lunch at the same garage each working day, if not on site
      Drinks to much - (too many credit card transactions to "Rugby Road Wine Store") =)
      etc etc etc .....

      The amount of number crunching needed to integrate these systems together would be astronomical even for a small island like the UK (unsure of the current population).

      However if I was a Wanted - Criminal / Pedophile etc #45358
      I WOULD BE WORRIED as the police do have access and the power to track rouge individuals - making the Earth a "safer" place to live.

      My point's .....

      Fellons should be tracked and taken to justice.

      Innocent people should have nothing to fear and should be content with the measures that there Government / President has taken to ensure there safety and well being.

    4. Re:Welcome to the Global Village by APDent · · Score: 2, Informative

      The story you're referring to is Isaac Asimov's "The Dead Past". Google keywords asimov "dead past" [including quotation marks] for pointers and reviews. Add keyword cigarette for DMCA-violation.

  4. Electronic movements by mst76 · · Score: 4, Funny

    > a personal TIA program to track my own electronic movements

    So is he an Autobot or a Decepticon?

  5. no surprises by mOoZik · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Why does this surprise him? It need not take that much work to figure out that writing checks or using the "card" can get you mapped out, especially if the govt. has the warrant to track you (and with the patriot act, it shouldn't be too hard). Redundant to say the least.

  6. Having reviewed your activities..... by FreeLinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    I can't help but come to the conclusion that; You don't get out much, do you?

  7. sounds a lot like LifeLog by noahmax · · Score: 5, Informative
    This "personal TIA" sounds a whole lot like LifeLog, the DARPA uber-diary program to catalog every aspect of a person's life.

    There's more info on LifeLog here and here.

    nms

  8. So, from that information ... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 2, Funny
    document every single electronically-recorded transaction I've made

    ... have you manage to determine whether or not you're an Al Qaida money launderer yet?

    If I were you, I'd watch myself real close, in case I turned out to be a real terrorist.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  9. Interesting experiment but... by BWJones · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, while this is interesting, from an illustrative standpoint (how much info can be retrieved from receipts and such), the site seems superficial and a little voyeuristic. I was hoping for some insight into the problem such as how to fight TIA, or from a CS perspective, even how to deal with disparate data from medical records to dinner transactions.

    However, this site should illustrate to us that one should realize that because of TIA, once these databases are created, they never really go away. They will be mined eventually by corporations looking to expand market share by tracking individuals shopping or lifestyle decisions. In fact, there is already precedence for this in recent history. And they will be used for alternative governmental purposes other than that originally intended. There is again precedence for this as well already.

    Finally, perhaps its the medical training but every time I see TIA, I think of transient ischemic attack which conceptually I suppose, total information awareness could induce in some folks. :-)

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
  10. My better TIA for one.. by legoburner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I too have been working on this sort of thing out of interest, but to a much larger degree. Since all my emails, chat logs, financial transactions, contact details, photos, etc. are digital and I have a record of them, I am able to place keys between them and come up with all sorts of useless info (which I will not share :P). Such things as:
    Can look at a photo, then see how much money I spent on that date, where I spent it and what I said about it to my friends online using regexps.
    Can map out (like this article) my location at any one time, with photos if it was since July 2003 (when I got my digital camera)
    Can at-a-glance see all communication with any one person, and who that person knows through CC'd emails, group chats, etc.
    Can get a calendar style day by day breakdown of time spent online, amount spent and where, amount I spoke to people online that day, etc.
    The system is pretty cool but needs a bit more work before I am happy with it, and it is probably going to be just for me since it is a mess of SQL, shell scripts, perl and java.

    Needless to say, the amount of data and stuff I can do with it is very scary. I cannot factor in recorded phone calls, precise supermarket purchases, etc. TIA and it's inevitable bigger brother (think patriot act then patriot act2) could store a lot more of my life than I would ever want to give out.

  11. Solution to TIA. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I don't think I've seen this mentioned before so here goes...
    As an act of civil disobedience, as a group flood TIA, Carnivore, etc with false information. Start referring to your online contacts as "terrorists", make references to "picking up the fertilizer and diesel", instant message each other with false meeting points you never actually go to, and generally throw a wrench into the cogs of the machine by making the signal-to-noise ratio more noise than signal.
    Some may call this unpatriotic, others may see it as patriotic, it's a personal judgement call as I see it.

    1. Re:Solution to TIA. by Sphere1952 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I know some people put long lists of "hot words" into their .sigs. I think one of them is the guy who runs cryptome.

      --
      Big Brother Bush is doubleplus ungood.
  12. Re:TIA? by jonfelder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    RTFT

    As in...read the f*cking title...

  13. Here's a freaking news flash for you on TIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was hoping for some insight into the problem such as how to fight TIA

    Umm... just a shot in the dark here - but how about not electing governments interested in implementing a defacto police state and pursuing imperialistic foreign policies to prop up an obsolete oil-based economy?

    But, hey, what do I know. No pity for you. My government tried this shit and enough people cared to stop it.

    Or.. perhaps you welcome your new overlords.

  14. And now everyone on /. knows where he's been. by Jin+Wicked · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't really think he needs a computer program to do this. Judging from some of my male coworkers, this sort of thing has been going on for years. If anyone wants to know exactly where he is at any given point in time, he should just get married... and then they can call his wife. ;)

    --
    My Webcomic: Asylum on 5th Street
  15. meh by c4ffeine · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I pay cash for pretty much everything now, but that's just because I don;t have a credit card yet (i'm too lazy). I'm wondering exactly what else the Total Information Awareness thing will be collecting; if I take out a big chunk of money from a ATM every week (like I do now) and pay in cash for everything that week, how much can they learn? i'm afraid of being a suspected terrorist now; I "hide my tracks" from the government, read slashdot, and am learning chemistry "to make bombs". That, and I've started encrypting some stuff I send

    --
    "73% of quotes on the Internet are made up" -Ben Franklin
    1. Re:meh by ScrewMaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      On the other hand, by simply paying for everything with cash and using your ATM that way you are probably just fitting yourself into some profile. Hard to say what that would be, though. It might simply be "anti-government whacko" (harmless) or "drug dealer" (call Bob at the DEA) or "terrorist" (throw him into a locked room and throw away the room.) In some respects you're probably better off just trying to fit in with the rest of us and hope that the Justice lightning doesn't strike too close to home. At one time it was sensible to try and hide stuff from the government because there were things like "Rules of Evidence" and "Attorney Client Privilege" and whatnot, but since they don't seem to have to prove actual wrongdoing anymore I'm not sure its such a good idea.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  16. Same old problem by Crashmarik · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The ability to gather the data about you has long been there. Commercial sources have been able to do this for nearly two decades, anyone remember the late and not lamented Lotus Marketplace ?.

    The real trick is to turn the raw data into meaningfull information. Its that lack of discrimination thats truly scary in letting the government assume that kind of power.

    I have no wish to have storm troopers drilling holes in my ceiling because my name is one letter off from a terrorist, or because I bought a pint of humous at the supermarket. Untill there is sufficient discrimination in the system to be intelligent about who it singles out, and Unless there is further the mandatory requirement for human investigation and discretion before acting this type of technology will be nothing but a loose cannon.

    As things currently stand this type of information will just be used to harrass and persecute people that have been flagged by or have annoyed some government beureuacrat. Terry pratchet in his truly insightfull manner summed up the relationship between the populace and the law, "Commander Grimes surveyed the crowd of people and amused himself by trying to figure out what each one was guilty of". Everyone is guilty of something, with the current level of litigation and legality within our society most people are guilty of many things they aren't even aware of.

    If TIA raw data is available for call up on any individual, suspicious material will be found, and nominally innocent people will have their lives made a hell. If however it can be predictive and then mediated with severe limits it could actually serve a valuable purpose.

  17. Re:This guy seems pretty paranoid. by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uh ... and you're not? It is NOT paranoia when they actually are out to get you, you know.

    Besides, I thought it was interesting to see a concrete example of what everyone (paranoids as well as normal sheep) has been worrying about. It's one thing when cops, spooks and other investigators have to spend time and effort to research what their victims, I mean, subjects are doing. It's quite another when detailed historical information about every person in the U.S. can be pulled up on a graphics monitor on an instant's notice, with no more effort than a couple of mouse clicks. No, I don't like that at all ... no significant barriers to misuse.

    --
    The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  18. Useful Illustration by maomoondog · · Score: 4, Informative
    He may be short on datapoints, but I think this gives a great illustration of how intrusive even a fraction of TIA's capabilities would be. This locational data could point probibalistically to hobbies, spending habits, sexual habits, organization membership and plenty of other things your employer / insurer / unfriendly regime (not talking just about USA) / local con artist / direct marketer / stalker would love to know. These systems will be made and abused, so if you care about any of the above, you should join efforts to condemn them socially wherever you are. I'm relieved the US Congress seems to be doing this by reconsidering funding TIA with taxes!

    If you live outside the USA, you should take special interest in [former TIA chief] [and felon] John Poindexter's recent open letter in the New York Times.

    It's pretty handwavy, but he makes a couple of interesting claims:
    • He says military research is free of moral content. His scientists are
      responsible for discovering what is possible; other agencies will be
      responsible for determining its correct use. I'm all for free exploration,
      but this is calculatedly naive. I think this project in particular was
      created with use in mind, and I think tax funded research should reflect
      what taxpayers feel is in their best interest.

    • He says TIA is aimed exclusively at foreign surveillance (and zeroes in on an
      American hotspot, claiming that American financial data isn't analyzed).
      I doubt this*, but even if it's true, citizens abroad should be letting their governments know about how they feel about the US accessing their data.


    *: DARPA funds a lot of research into how to appease American privacy laws while conducting surveillance.
  19. I did this too by wfmcwalter · · Score: 2, Funny

    I did this on myself also, and I found out the following:

    - 5 visits to 8-ball's bomb shop in Harwood
    - 45 visits to various branches of AmmuNation around the city
    - two purchases of rocket launchers from Phil's Army Surplus

    I don't see what the big deal is. What could anyone infer from that?

    --
    ## W.Finlay McWalter ## http://www.mcwalter.org ##
  20. Re:Worrying by legoburner · · Score: 3, Informative

    From my unreliable, tertiary sources I believe that the UK has 6 months for standard data (eg; if you dont use your blockbuster card for 6 months they delete you from their database), CCTV in towns is removed after 2 days (if you ever need the police to review some, or want to get a copy then you need to be quick or you are out of luck), credit card data I am not sure about, though banking data disappears from my online statement every quarter and credit card data disappears after a year. One cant help but assume that my data is sitting in some offsite backup somewhere though. All this is covered under the UK's Data Protection Act 1998, in which an individual can demand a company or govt agency to give them all the data they want about themselves (for a fee of no more than inflation-adjusted 15 GBP), and if they do not, or are found to be withholding data, they are subject to a fine of something like 30000 GBP per instance.

  21. And it just goes to illustrate... by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 2

    The amount of data thatis available is much to large to even store on a single or any group of machines available to the kind of money that has been allocated to the project.

    In fact, I was involved with a project to capture the billing records of AT&T for a 3 month rolling store some years ago. The largest theoretical system at the time was too small to handle the amount of data, by a factor of 1/3.

    Scale this up to all transactions by all people. No computer in existance can handle the volume of data, even before the government tries to determine which data is important.

    I'm not really worried about this program for that reason. It will never fly.

    1. Re:And it just goes to illustrate... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes, but on the other hand no commercial interest has even a fraction of the resources available to it that the Federal Government has, and would cheerfully misdirect to this end. And you also don't realize that long-term archival storage of this information isn't the point. The fact that you bought a box of doughnuts ten years ago is irrelevant: the fact that you bought something yesterday that is considered relevant today is the point. What they can do is require organizations that do collect personal information (credit bureaus, banks) to look for specific information and forward it to the TIA systems. There is already precedent for that: banks are required to report cash transactions that exceed specific limits, for example.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  22. Not a new idea by babbage · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This isn't exactly a new idea. The most prominent antecedent for this is Gordon Bell's MyLifeBits project at Microsoft Research. But even that isn't original -- Bell is working against ideas first presented in an article Vannevar Bush wrote for the July 1945 issue of Atlantic Monthly, As We May Think.

    Bush's essay is really fascinating to read: he envisions a magical desk that could record all a person's thoughts & encounters, and provide the ability to browse that library through a special screen on the device. Keep in mind that this was in 1945, right at the beginning of the computer era, when these machines were the size of buildings, far more complicated to operate, and nowhere near powerful enough. Now, half a century later, Bell feels that the technology is finally at the point where Bush's ideas can be implemented. Think what you will of Microsoft, or of the "big brother" implications of such a machine -- the very fact that this sort of thing is being put into practice is quite impressive.

    Anyone working on such omnipresent recording & retrieval systems needs to be aware of this prior art.

  23. I've audited banks... by JRHelgeson · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I can tell you now that any time you swipe your card - that information goes first to the credit card processor where a few pennies go to the card issuer. Not the bank but Visa, Mastercard, Amex or Discover.

    Then the data are sent to the bank. OF COURSE they track all this info. THEY HAVE TO! THEY'RE BANKS!!! There is a money trail/information trail that is left behind any time you ever do ANYTHING with electronic banking.

    If the FBI or local police get a subpoena, they have access to all this information NOW. STOP THE PRESSES!!!

    What blows my fuse is that people think that this is NEW, and it is being put in place by the Dept of Homeland Security. Can you say FUD?

    If the data is already out there, and its already retrieveable once they get a warrant/subpoena. What is wrong here?

    --
    Good security is based upon reality and common sense. Common sense is a function of having common knowledge.
    1. Re:I've audited banks... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No only do they want it available with judicial oversight, they want it available on-demand, conveniently, right on their desktops. No waiting ... just point and click. No thanks ... I want these people to have to work to find out anything of consequence about me.

      The other, bigger, danger is in the centralization of information. Yes, certainly, someone with a stack of subpoena forms can go make a bunch of phone calls, find out where your accounts are, and get what he wants. The data is stored all over in different systems by different organizations ... anyone wanting to find out everything about you specifically will have some work to do.

      Now imagine that same information being stored on a massive government system or network. Even if it isn't stored there, but is simply available upon-demand by that government system it means that your personal info can be grabbed by a Fed, special agent, hacker, cracker, terrorist, or foreign government at a single point of entry.

      That's risky at best. Given the government's track record on security (and the Department of Homeland Security's recent choice of Microsoft products for all it's in-house needs) I think it's fair to assume that unauthorized access would occur.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  24. Not just "no big deal" by zachlipton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    When I first looked at this, I thought (as a lot of people here have commented) that this wasn't much of a big deal: so what? This guy scanned in a few receipts and plotted them on a map, big deal...

    However, as I started to look more closely at his patterns, I thought to myself: wow! Based on just this tiny swatch of information, I already know the aproximate area where he lives. If I wanted, I could find the average household income in his neighborhood. I know what he eats and I can tell if he's going to have a party next week based on what he got at the grocery store.

    I know what date and time he went to the market, so if I had a few more data points, I could probably predict when he's going to be there.

    He got a map of Central America at Borders, perhaps a statistical model shows that people following his patterns are likely to be terrorists who want to commit atacks in Central America? Or perhaps we can market cheap airline tickets to him?

    While this may just look like a guys random map, you can piece together a whole lot from this.

  25. You're a lousy tipper by quietlysubversive · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone notice the fact that this guy leaves some pretty shitty tips?

    --
    ----(o)----
  26. Looks like a terrorist to me. by Sir+Holo · · Score: 3, Funny


    Take a look at his purchasing behavior at Safeway - Goya rice, three separate purchases of mangos.

    And what's this? Kim-chee? Bean paste, pickled bamboo, and guava? Any connection to North Korea here? Has he purchased any maps of North Korea lately?

    Also appears to be an avid news reader, and heavy user of public transportation. Definitely a troublemaker.

  27. Re:You don't seem too worried. by Michael+Hunt · · Score: 2

    Yes, and if you do a whois, you get to find out that 'Sid' is also an alias.

    I don't care about that. I don't care that people know that i'm a unix guy who likes playing snooker with his spathyfillum. This is information which I am VOLUNTEERING. There is a difference, and it is great.

  28. TIA won't scale by GoldenBB · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While interesting, I lose no sleep over TIA because it simply won't scale into any sample size big enough to actually be useful for catching terrorists. As with baggage screening, face recognition, and pretty much every other system the US Goverment has been thinking about or implementing, the false positive rate is far too high. If terrorists were 50% of the population and easy to identify, it might be useful. And what does this example prove? If you "game" the system, in other words, actively try to thwart being tracked, you will find it is easy to do. It would be easy to make the system think you are out getting groceries while you are actually off committing a murder in another state. The perfect alibi!

  29. Too much flack by ScrotumLegs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm surprised how much hell this dude is catching from you all. First, he's not coding something for a competition, it looks like a project he's done on his spare time just to put a picture to how easy it would be to compile info and track people. He's not claiming anything about its quality. Second, to the bright one who wrote "sounds like a terrorist to me," just because someone buys oriental food, doesn't mean they are from N.Korea. And in case you are still prone to unhealthy non sequitur, if someone is from N. Korea, it doesn't mean they are a terrorist. And third, to those saying he should get a life, you're the ones spending your time conversing through /. He's doing research at a think tank in DC, no doubt an advocate for stuff most slashdotters only complain about.