Slashdot Mirror


Mac OS X 10.2.8 Available

Transfan76 writes "The 10.2.8 Update delivers enhanced functionality and improved reliability for the following applications, services and technologies: Audio, Bluetooth, Classic compatibility, Finder, Graphics, LDAP, Power Management, Safari, and FireWire and USB device compatibility. The update also provides updated security services and includes the latest Security Updates." Does this have the update to ssh?

55 of 280 comments (clear)

  1. Yes. by Brazzo · · Score: 5, Informative
    %ssh -V
    OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693
    Yes.
    1. Re:Yes. by raju1kabir · · Score: 2, Informative
      OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693

      They're behind by one. See CAN-2003-0695.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    2. Re:Yes. by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Well, I assumed the anti-mac frat boys would take mention this, but evidently the years of cheap beer and Dawson Creek has dulled their minds...

      I really must say that Apple putting a security patch and a feature update together in the same download is really horrible. We have been justifiable criticizing MS for doing the same things, and they finally got the message.

      With the Software Update interface in OS X such combinations are unnecessary. All updates are automatically checked, so there is no extra work for the average user if patches get delivered in 1 or 4 packages. For those who want only the security updates, a few clicks will remove the unneeded packages.

      This really bothers me because one thing that Apple does, and the reason I spend my money on Apples, and have for more years than I care to admit, is that they do try not to make the silly mistakes. Like forcing someone to download an Audio update onto a production box that never does audio.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  2. Same as G5s by MBCook · · Score: 4, Informative

    Now, this update is NOT FOR G5 OWNERS. That said, does this update basically bring all G3s and G4s to the same as G5s (bugfix and feature/improvement wise, except for 1 or 2 very new ones), or is this above and beyond (since I know that G5s shipped with a newer version of OS X). Thanks.

    --
    Comment forecast: Bits of genius surrounded by a sea of mediocrity.
  3. YAY Update :) by Puggs · · Score: 4, Insightful

    OK, so how many of you Apple owners saw this, and reached instantly for the Software Update with glee?

    And how many thought the same when the latest Windows Bloat Patch ^W^WUpdate came along? not many? thought as much :)

    oh the joys of being a proud owner or a 12" PB.....

    hmm maybe I need to update my .sig - ... And Mac OS X just gets out of the way, letting you do what you wanted to do...

    1. Re:YAY Update :) by Otter · · Score: 5, Insightful
      OK, so how many of you Apple owners saw this, and reached instantly for the Software Update with glee?

      I dunno -- some of us who remember the iTunes updater fiasco like to wait a day or two before applying patches and updates. If there's a disaster out there, let it be someone else who stumbles across it. Same for Linux kernels, new versions in emerge (do I really need a new point release of awk this minute) and anything else.

      I mean, I get your point but Mac users do get burned too, and I'd rather it's you than me.

    2. Re:YAY Update :) by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Interesting

      At least Mac users update eventually. Windows users (yes, I am one) apply even old patches in mortal fear that their machines will not function properly. After the last round of "updates" my machine is unable to copy & paste after it has been on for more than about 45 minutes. Another update eliminated the photo viewing tool that had been previously installed with the OS. I need to do a clean install and start over but there isn't time for it now. I will probably just "deal" until I get a new machine. Hopefully that will happen before the end of the year.

    3. Re:YAY Update :) by Orbital+Sander · · Score: 2, Funny

      Another update eliminated the photo viewing tool that had been previously installed with the OS.

      That's not a bug, it's a DRM thing.

  4. where's blaster? by McAddress · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have been waiting to get infected with the blaster worm for several weeks now. Will this uodate open a security hole to allow that to happen?

  5. command line software update by iradik · · Score: 4, Informative
    [MacLab:~] admin% softwareupdate
    Software Update Tool
    Copyright 2002 Apple Computer, Inc.

    Software Update found the following new or updated software:

    - MacOSXUpdate10.2-10.2.8
    Mac OS X Update (10.2.8), 41552K - restart required
    - iPod201-2.0.1
    iPod Software (2.0.1), 16000K
    - iPod130-1.3
    iPod Software (1.3), 5830K

    To install an update, run this tool with the item name as an argument.
    e.g. 'softwareupdate <item> ...'
  6. Re:I HATE MAC'S by Llywelyn · · Score: 2

    Dude, I've installed one on multiple TiBooks and iBooks, if you had to "take the entire thing apart" you did something wrong.

    On a TiBook:

    You remove eight screws, a piece of metal, and it should click in easily. Albeit it is even easier in an iBook, where you don't even have to deal with screws.

    --
    Integrate Keynote and LaTeX
  7. uptime by edalytical · · Score: 4, Funny

    Given how frequently Apple updates OS X, I'm never going to have an impressive uptime. The last update was what about 2 weeks ago?

    --
    Win a signed Stephen Carpenter ESP Guitar from the Deftones: http://def-tag.com/?r=0008781
    1. Re:uptime by CptChipJew · · Score: 3, Informative

      The MacOS 10.2.6 update is a lot older than 2 weeks.

      However, you're right in the sense that these updates don't actually require a restart. They are just doing it "to be sure".

      --
      Vonal Declosion
    2. Re:uptime by Juanvaldes · · Score: 4, Informative

      As another poster said "to be sure", also I bet apple and old school mac users are uneasy with the idea of system updates without a restart. I'm just glad they finally wised up and don't have the iApps force you to restart anymore.

    3. Re:uptime by babbage · · Score: 4, Informative

      upgrades have involved reboots in the past because, to improve performace, Apple has implemented part of iTunes as kernel extensions, and any tampering with the kernel requires a fresh boot to ensure stability. Other updates may have been done out of ignorance or habit, but in the case of the iApps, the reboots have generally been unavoidable.

      That said, did the 10.2.8 update involve any kernel changes? It's been long enough that there could be a point release to the kernel itself by now, not to mention any other updated kernel extensions. I haven't yet had a chance to inspect the bill of materials (hint: lsbom /Library/Receipts/fooApp.pkg to learn what was updated in a given package), but if anything in there touched the kernel, then a reboot really does has to happen.

    4. Re:uptime by kwerle · · Score: 4, Informative

      However, you're right in the sense that these updates don't actually require a restart. They are just doing it "to be sure".

      I suppose they could try to kill the old sshd and restart it - but that's more trouble than it's worth.

      As for uptime complaints because of update...

      NEWSFLASH: If you don't wanna lose the uptime, don't update.

      Or do it by hand and don't restart. Or just get a grip and realize that it don't matter.

      I didn't restart for the Java patch...

    5. Re:uptime by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought the whole idea of the Mach microkernel was that the main BSD kernel could be modified on-the-fly. You could concievably save the kernel state, stop it, load a new one and restore the state, all without a restart.

      You CAN do kernel changes to some degree and not restart the machine, look at SUN and Soalris.

      --
      Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    6. Re:uptime by Have+Blue · · Score: 3, Informative

      Judging from the change list, it patches the USB, Bluetooth, and audio drivers. Maybe Apple doesn't feel comfortable changing kexts without a reboot.

  8. Re:Yes on SSH by phamlen · · Score: 4, Funny

    Amazingly, three people all posted the answer to SSH within 1 minute, but you were first!

    Congratulations! You win 4 points of karma!

    The other players each lose a point each for being redundant. But they do get a copy of the home game!

  9. Transparent dock now gone by Froomb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Otherwise no problems with 10.2.8 so far, but must say I miss my invisible dock background.

  10. XBench by Nexum · · Score: 4, Informative

    FWIW, my XBench results under 10.2.6 were 69.99. Under 10.2.8 I have 76.3.

    A nice little improvement even if it is a synthetic benchmark it's nice to see Apple striving for optimisation. Hopefully this mindset will be seen in Panther to a much greater degree seeing as being a full .x update the changes to the underlying OS have much greater license.

    -Nex

    --

    This sig has been deprecated.
  11. Breaks M-Audio Revolution 7.1 by qengho · · Score: 3, Informative

    A couple of people have reported to XLR8 Your Mac that their M-Audio Revolution 7.1 cards no longer work after the update. One mentions that M-Audio knows about it and is working on a fix.

  12. Odd monitor gotcha by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 5, Informative
    Installed 10.2.8 on a 12" PowerBook (aka 'the footlong'), no discernable problems so far.

    An odd thing was that it reset my monitor settings back to 16bit colour ('Thousands'), so you may want to watch out for that. Aqua does such a good job of dithering you probably wouldn't even notice at first.

    Another odd thing was that my display went a little funky when doing the cross-fading desktop pictures just a second ago. Fixed itself after the transition was complete, no idea what that's about.

    If you're superstitious like me don't forget to do the Repair Permissions trick - its the new Rebuild Desktop - although I had no issues there either.

    One last thing, be prepared to have your frickin Keychain pestering you for the next week....

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  13. Re:from tech article... by heychris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    So here's my $50,000 question. Since the newest G4s were supposed to actually have USB 2.0 chipsets in them, but the software was throttling them back to 1.1, does this update magically turn the late G4 MDDs into USB 2.0 machines? CC

  14. more on x-fading pics by thatguywhoiam · · Score: 4, Informative
    Just replying to my own post with more info...

    The cross-fading desktops feature has a new bug (on a 12" PB anyway) where the secondary monitor - in my case a Sony 17" CRT - screws up the transition effect.

    The PowerBook is running at 1024x768/32bit on its main display, and 1280x1024/32bit on the secondary (NOT mirroring).

    During the crossfade the first picture suddenly appears to squish to have the horizontal resolution, pushed to the left, and the palette gets munged (purple). It snaps back to normal after the fade but it ain't pretty.

    --
    If Jesus wants me it knows where to find me.
  15. All Recent Security Updates by Rosyna · · Score: 5, Informative

    APPLE-SA-2003-09-22 Mac OS X 10.2.8

    Mac OS X 10.2.8 is now available. It contains fixes for recent
    vulnerabilities in:

    OpenSSH: Mac OS X 10.2.8 contains the patches to address CVE
    CAN-2003-0693, CAN-2003-0695, and CAN-2003-0682. On Mac OS X
    versions prior to 10.2.8, the vulnerability is limited to a denial
    of service from the possibility of causing sshd to crash. Each
    login session has its own sshd, so established connections are
    preserved up to the point where system resources are exhausted by
    an attack.

    To deliver the update in a rapid and reliable manner, only the
    patches for CVE IDs listed above were applied, and not the entire
    set of patches for OpenSSH 3.7.1. Thus, the OpenSSH version in
    Mac OS X 10.2.8, as obtained via the "ssh -V" command, is:
    OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL
    0x0090609f

    Sendmail: Addresses CVE CAN-2003-0694 and CAN-2003-0681 to fix a
    buffer overflow in address parsing, as well as a potential buffer
    overflow in ruleset parsing.

    fb_realpath(): Fixes CAN-2003-0466 which is an off-by-one error in
    the fb_realpath() function that may allow attackers to execute
    arbitrary code.

    arplookup(): Fixes CAN-2003-0804. The arplookup() function caches
    ARP requests for routes on a local link. On a local subnet only,
    it is possible for an attacker to send a sufficient number of
    spoofed ARP requests which will exhaust kernel memory, leading to
    a denial of service.

  16. Re:I HATE MAC'S by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    INSIDE THE MACHINE oooo... SCARY! Watch your fingers now, something might get up and bite you!

    Computer guy eh? Let me ask you a question....

    I was writing a paper, on my PC when it went beepbeepbeepbeepbeepbeepbeep, and like half of my paper was gone!

    What do you think the problem is?

  17. tell apple you're not satisfied with patch time by Irevia · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you're not satisfied that it's taken about a week to patch sendmail and OpenSSH, send them feedback. This is what I sent them (although I don't suggest you say exactly the same!):

    I just wanted to make feedback regarding the fact that it's taken a whole week between reports of the OpenSSH and sendmail vulnerabilities and Apple releasing a patch.

    As a long-time Unix user just entering the world of OS X (and mostly enjoying it very much), I wanted to note that the FreeBSD project released patches within 24 hours of initial reports, as did many Linux vendors, and that I would expect faster response time from Apple in the future. Delays have a negative effect on the PR image of Apple as well as being a pain for admins and end users!

    Thanks for taking the time to read this.

    1. Re:tell apple you're not satisfied with patch time by valkraider · · Score: 2, Funny

      Complaining about ONE WEEK turnaround. Geeze, don't ever try to get cable TV installed... (grin)

    2. Re:tell apple you're not satisfied with patch time by BostonPilot · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I think a week is reasonable if they used the time to do lots of testing. I hate patches that don't work correctly. Ref: what everybody seems to complain about Microsoft patches... they're afraid of them making things worse and breaking stuff.

      A reasonable amount of QA testing goes a long way towards good reliability in my book.

  18. Apple Security Mailing List by Johnny+Mnemonic · · Score: 2, Redundant


    Here's the list of official changes to security in 10.2.8 (read it for yourself at security-announce@apple.com):

    APPLE-SA-2003-09-22 Mac OS X 10.2.8

    Mac OS X 10.2.8 is now available. It contains fixes for recent vulnerabilities in:

    OpenSSH: Mac OS X 10.2.8 contains the patches to address CVE CAN-2003-0693, CAN-2003-0695, and CAN-2003-0682. On Mac OS X versions prior to 10.2.8, the vulnerability is limited to a denial of service from the possibility of causing sshd to crash. Each login session has its own sshd, so established connections are preserved up to the point where system resources are exhausted by an attack.

    To deliver the update in a rapid and reliable manner, only the patches for CVE IDs listed above were applied, and not the entire set of patches for OpenSSH 3.7.1. Thus, the OpenSSH version in Mac OS X 10.2.8, as obtained via the "ssh -V" command, is: OpenSSH_3.4p1+CAN-2003-0693, SSH protocols 1.5/2.0, OpenSSL 0x0090609f

    Sendmail: Addresses CVE CAN-2003-0694 and CAN-2003-0681 to fix a buffer overflow in address parsing, as well as a potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing.

    fb_realpath(): Fixes CAN-2003-0466 which is an off-by-one error in the fb_realpath() function that may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.

    arplookup(): Fixes CAN-2003-0804. The arplookup() function caches ARP requests for routes on a local link. On a local subnet only, it is possible for an attacker to send a sufficient number of spoofed ARP requests which will exhaust kernel memory, leading to a denial of service.

    --

    --
    $tar -xvf .sig.tar
  19. Re:Hey, what happened to 10.2.7? by macmaxbh · · Score: 2, Informative

    10.2.7 was a G5-only version of Mac OS X as a stop-gap measure before Apple finishes 10.3.
    Apple says (http://docs.info.apple.com/article.html?artnum=86 426)
    Don't use the 10.2.7 CDsthat come with the G5 macs on normal macs, it's g5 only.

  20. Re:Updated SSH by LinuxMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wow! I went to that URL, and realized something pretty crazy, if you enter older article numbers, you can see some cool historical stuff. For example: Apple II+: Mini-Assembler (1 of 2) or Apple III: Emulation Mode--Controlling Bit 8 of the RS-232 Port. Kinda cool, though not exactly the topic of this article.

    Powerbook G4 1ghz

  21. A good question. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here we are (happily) updating our Macs, looking forward to things being fixed, updated and working better, not to mention new features and faster performance.

    Has anyone out there *ever* updated Windows and expected it to *speed up* your computer?

    I look at Windows update with dread - not knowing what evil new EULA, spyware, bugs and exploits await every trip.

    Software Update is something that Apple got *so* right. People *want* to run it. Hell, I check twice a day! Do most Windows users even KNOW about Windows Update??

    Another reason I just gave Apple my money.

    1. Re:A good question. by chipset · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well.. The only update I have ever done to speed up any of my PCs was to reinstall. However, reinstalling Windows 2000 or newer requires so many reboots to get up-to-date patches it isn't even funny. And, of course, once the OS is installed and configured and the applications running on it, it slows back down to a crawl. I have an IBM thinkpad T30. 2Ghz, 1GB mem, 60GB hd... and when doing anything, it will pause to thrash on the HD. Really sucks when you are doing development work.. I must say, since I switched, I check fairly often for the updates, especially when I know something is out there. And, for the most part, I instantly want the updates, unlike MS Windows where I tell the updater to skip them, for the umpteenth time. As for the EULA, and I admit this, I never read them. Hardly anyone else does either. It's that or be stuck with a system that's as vulnerable as a nice car sitting on the street in manhattan at midnight in a dark alley. Why even ask for a password on Windows? It matters?

  22. Re:I HATE MAC'S by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Well, to change the battery, I had to take the screen apart and all the colors fell out!

    I called Apple and they said that that wasn't covered under Applecare! I have a paper due, and have 16.5 million colors to put back! Your problems don't amount to a hill of beans, Mister!

  23. Re:The SSH version by Graff · · Score: 5, Informative
    Well, this has *an* update to ssh, I dunno if it's *the* update to ssh.

    Yep, according to this technote it's *the* update to ssh:
    Mac OS X 10.2.8

    OpenSSH: Addresses CAN-2003-0693, CAN-2003-0695, and CAN-2003-0682 to fix buffer management errors in OpenSSH's sshd versions prior to 3.7.1

    sendmail: Addresses CAN-2003-0694 and CAN-2003-0681 to fix a buffer overflow in address parsing, as well as a potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing.

    fb_realpath(): Fixes CAN-2003-0466 which is an off-by-one error in the fb_realpath() function that may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.

    arplookup(): Fixes CAN-2003-0804. The arplookup() function caches ARP requests for routes on a local link. On a local subnet only, it is possible for an attacker to send a sufficient number of spoofed ARP requests which will exhaust kernel memory, leading to a denial of service.
  24. Re:Hey, what happened to 10.2.7? by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oddly enough, the release notes for the new update say it updates 10.2.6 and 10.2.7 to 10.2.8, and then says you can't use it on a G5.

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  25. Re:AHHHH by MoneyT · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Wasn't there a post when 10.2.6 came out regarding installing these updates without having to bring the whole system down for a restart. It was a lot of work, and essentialy did the same thing as a restart but it kept the uptime clokc running

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  26. Re:Where is 10.1.6?? by HSpirit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That misses the point entirely.

    1. When was OSX 10.1 released? After Windows 2000, right? What kind of outcry would there be if Micro$oft announced:
      "There's a critical security update available for Windows XP. The issue affects Windows 2000 too, but we don't support that any more."
      There'd be people wanting to charge Micro$oft with Treason...!
    2. If I update the vendor included version with SSH with a version compiled from source, or even a binary not obtained from the vendor, in terms of support I am screwed, no?

    I recommended purchase of a Mac in our office recently, due to the fact it could handle both the graphic design and web/mail serving requirements. My boss knows about Jaguar, but his opinion is that he shouldn't have to upgrade only a year after purchasing the Mac - he has a point, surely?

  27. Re:I HATE MAC'S by theolein · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was going to mod you up in sympathy but I decided to reply instead when I saw the flamebait at the end of your post. I agree fully that the installation procedure for the airport card is not trivial, and is a blemish on Apple's otherwise very good hardware record. It could really have been made simpler or at leats be done for free at an Apple store. Technically challenged people (most computer users fit into this category) should not be made to do this.

    But Apple has made these cards default in the newer Powerbooks AFAIK and you could have installed a wireless PC card with the same ease as you would have on a PC laptop. Apart from this I have never seen a PC laptop with an even close attention to detail and engineering quality of an Apple laptop, with the possible exception of IBM's Thinkpads, which are quite solid. Dell and Compaq's offerings are poorly engiineered in order to save money and it shows.

    Anyway, who cares. If something drives you to rage, then I think you have other problems...

  28. USB 2.0 Finally Works by SteveHeadroom · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Belkin USB 2.0 PCI card I put in my Dual-867 PowerMac G4 now works at USB 2.0 speed. I can actually transfer files to my Maxtor external hard drive in a reasonable amount of time. Too bad I already bought a Firewire drive to use instead.

    Apple pioneered the use of USB and Firewire. It's a shame to see they dropped the ball on USB 2 until now.

  29. ETHERNET PROBLEM by gidds · · Score: 5, Informative
    10.2.8 includes a new version of the internal Ethernet driver; many folks have found it stops their Ethernet from working!

    Discussed further here. Respect to Andrew McPherson for coming up with a workaround: make a backup of /System/Library/Extensions/AppleGMACEthernet.kext before upgrading, and restore it afterwards. If you've already upgraded, follow the link for more info.

    --

    Ceterum censeo subscriptionem esse delendam.

    1. Re: ETHERNET PROBLEM by frankie · · Score: 2, Informative
      1. ifconfig in Terminal
      2. probably doable in Property List Editor
      3. Network options in Cocktail
  30. Small Fonts in Safari by reiggin · · Score: 4, Informative

    Very small fonts in Safari render MUCH better now. They are actually legible. Must be an improvement to the Webcore. I can now read the positions on my Yahoo! Fantasy Football roster!

  31. Re:I HATE MAC'S by tgibbs · · Score: 3, Informative
    I got the job as I'm the "Computer Guy" and can generally help friends and family with there computer problems. I have never seen such a tragedy of design as the TiBook!
    Evidently, you didn't want to endanger your "computer guy" status by actually reading the directions. Besides, I'm sure your friend was very impressed by your extensive and unnecessary disassembly of her Powerbook, and will probably believe you when you blame Apple for the damage that you did.

    Oh, by the way, the "easily accessed" slot is on the side, just where it is on a PC, and accepts standard wireless cards. The Airport card is for people who don't want to be bothered unplugging their wireless card every time they want to to put something else in that slot.

  32. Not for G5 per Apple by djupedal · · Score: 3, Informative

    >Dumbass, Sir, to you....

    TOPIC

    This software updates Mac OS X 10.2.6 or 10.2.7 to version 10.2.8.

    Important: This update works only with Power Mac G3- and G4-based desktop and portable computers, including iMac, eMac, and iBook. This update does not work with Power Mac G5 computers.

    1. Re:Not for G5 per Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are two 10.2.7 versions.

      The G5 one is "10.2.7 (G5)" and the one for the new PowerBooks is simply "10.2.7".

  33. Re:from tech article... by gerardrj · · Score: 2, Informative

    As another poster alluded to, USB 2.0 != high speed.
    USB 2.0 is a new protocol standard, it happens to have two version (IIRC), standard and fast. You CAN impliment USB 2.0 and only support the older/slower transfer speed.

    For whatever reason, Apple has decided to not use (perhaps not license) the "USB 2.0 (HighSpeed)" logo.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
  34. This took me forever to find, for some reason. by toothfish · · Score: 2, Informative
  35. Re:Where is 10.1.6?? by trash+eighty · · Score: 2, Insightful

    well in the past an update for 10.1 has come out a few days after one for 10.2 (though not always) so lets just wait and see before passing judgement huh?

  36. Double Checking. by jellomizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One Week isn't that bad of an update time. I am sure that after they make the change they will check it out to make sure it works on all the platform that OS X runs on. As well configure it to work with OS X settings, Put the files in a way so it can be sent for an update. OpenSSH people have developed their product for BSD and Linux so checking the update takes less time. of OS X Apple probably needs to tweak it a little. And check to make sure it works. Plus I think it was an issue that they had an upgrade planned anyways so just wait a couple of days and allow for one reboot except for 2.

    --
    If something is so important that you feel the need to post it on the internet... It probably isn't that important.
  37. You're behind by two by daveschroeder · · Score: 2, Informative

    See Apple's Security page:

    Mac OS X 10.2.8

    OpenSSH: Addresses CAN-2003-0693, CAN-2003-0695, and CAN-2003-0682 to fix buffer management errors in OpenSSH's sshd versions prior to 3.7.1

    sendmail: Addresses CAN-2003-0694 and CAN-2003-0681 to fix a buffer overflow in address parsing, as well as a potential buffer overflow in ruleset parsing.

    fb_realpath(): Fixes CAN-2003-0466 which is an off-by-one error in the fb_realpath() function that may allow attackers to execute arbitrary code.

    arplookup(): Fixes CAN-2003-0804. The arplookup() function caches ARP requests for routes on a local link. On a local subnet only, it is possible for an attacker to send a sufficient number of spoofed ARP requests which will exhaust kernel memory, leading to a denial of service.

  38. Seperate updates? by beattie · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why does everything have to be installed as a system upgrade? There should be seperate updates for SSH, Sendmail, System, ... and then you can choose what to install. This makes it easier for people with 10.1 also. As they can just install the SSH and/or Sendmail without needing 10.2 for the System update. Seems pretty basic to me.

  39. More info on Safari update by tuxedobob · · Score: 2, Informative

    Apple has apparently improved CSS in Safari. The Complex Spiral Demo previously mentioned via the Mac Browser Smackdown, which in turn was mentioned on slashdot, now renders correctly in Safari. (Previously Safari was coloring black the parts which weren't in the blue box and were off the screen when the page finished loading.)

    (As a side note, I couldn't load the Ars Technica article without turning off Javascript. It kept sending me to some crappy ad that was supposed to redirect me back to the article but didn't.)