Slashdot Mirror


Half-Life 2 Officially Delayed

sm4k[X-D] writes "According to Shacknews, the PC first-person shooter Half-Life 2 has officially been delayed. They quote Valve's Doug Lombardi as saying: 'The previously announced September 30th release date for Half-Life 2 is being pushed back. We are currently targeting a holiday release, but do not have a specific 'in-store' date to share at this time. We will release that information as soon as we have confirmed a new date.'"

114 comments

  1. Noooooooo by madaxe42 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Ah well, doom3 will be better, and it's better to release a software product late, rather than early, and badly.

    1. Re:Noooooooo by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Could Valve have fucked up more this past month? A lot of people I know, Valve has lost all credibility now. I've never seen a softco's status sink so quick. In a month they've

      1) Screwed the CS 1.6 beta testers by removing the bots, with no official comment from Valve.

      2) ROYALLY bollocksed up the release of Steam, to a degree that most MMORPG's could point and laugh at. Be playing your favourite games in minutes they said... HAHAH! More like weeks.

      3) Delaying Half Life 2.

      Let's not forget that Condition Zero was originally scheduled for around October 2001!

      In short, Valve, in just a few short weeks, have royally fucked up any good will they had amongst a good chunk of the gaming community. The fanboys will still be there, but a lot of the people who loved Valve, but weren't fanboys will now go elsewhere. Will they go bankrupt over all this? Nah, but the profits for the company will sure take a hit.

    2. Re:Noooooooo by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh yeah, there's also Team Fortess 2 which was due, what? 1999 or so?

      Christ, it makes the guys behind Duke Nukem Forever look swift... (If that game makes it to market and doesn't suck to Daikatana levels I'll be amazed).

    3. Re:Noooooooo by antin · · Score: 1

      I really doubt it - gaming companies screw up all the time - hell most games release these days with patches already waiting for you before you open the box. And in any case, Half-life 2 doesn't need the good name of Valve to sell, just the fact that it is the sequel to 'everyone's' favorite FPS guarantees that.

      Realistically, I doubt anyone expected it to ship on time - there have been hints of delays for a month or two now (denied I know) - and gamers are all talk - they bitch and bitch and bitch and continue to play and buy games anyway.

    4. Re:Noooooooo by Ciderx · · Score: 1

      I think you'll find that to some extents numbers (1) and (3) are because of (2). I, among the vast majority of people who have used Steam, have found it to be absolutely ridiculously poor.

      I find it surprising that Valve would risk Half Life 2's early reputation and hype by the smaller side issues which, frankly, the royalties from HL2 will fund.

      And Microsoft will be happy. Thanks to the lack of competition, It means a lot more people will be buying the PC version of Halo when that comes out in a couple of weeks! (indeed, I'm surprised that you slashdotters haven't gone for that tin-foil-hat conspiracy)

    5. Re:Noooooooo by Goldberg's+Pants · · Score: 1

      The bots were removed BEFORE the Steam debacle. The info was snuck in 2 days after the latest changes were posted, but this was before Steam became an unmitigated clusterfuck.

      As to the poster saying about peopling bitching and bitching but still buying the games... Well, some of us have balls and stick to our decisions. Won't be buying a Valve title again after all this nonsense. Neither will a fair few of my friends. Sure it ain't much, but just because most people are spineless little bitches doesn't mean we all have to be.

    6. Re:Noooooooo by droper · · Score: 1

      you'll buy it and you'll like it. Valve made the mistake of saying something before 100%, but thats about it. Anyways I'm pretty happy with how the game looks so far. They said way back if it takes a few more weeks they will take them. That was at E3 from Gabe himself who i think it the only one to listen to.

    7. Re:Noooooooo by Kelz · · Score: 1
      1) Screwed the CS 1.6 beta testers by removing the bots, with no official comment from Valve. 2) ROYALLY bollocksed up the release of Steam, to a degree that most MMORPG's could point and laugh at. Be playing your favourite games in minutes they said... HAHAH! More like weeks. 3) Delaying Half Life 2.

      Dont make me laugh. If all that shit makes sure that HL2 is a good game, its worth it to me. As to the delaying of it, you'll forget all about it the second you get the game. Remember when Warcraft III came out?
  2. Huge surprise. by Sevn · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Maybe it's because they want to make sure their GNU/Linux port is perfect.

    HAHAHAH!

    But I digress. I'm really not looking forward to this game. You can mod me down for my opinion if you want, but it's how I feel. This is the first engine they have done completely on their own. I have little doubt that there will be massive problems that they will blame on either hardware or drivers because that is what Valve does. It doesn't take long to look at the long history of problems with HL that were blamed on drivers or hardware that Valve ended up fixing silently with patches later. They seem to have problems fessing up to issues with their products. Don't get me wrong, I'm STILL completely addicted to counterstrike. But Valve didn't make Counter Strike did they?

    --
    For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    1. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      OH OH OH!

      Da fanboys goona GETCHA!!!
      mark my words THEY WILL!!!

    2. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First engine on their own? Half-Life was based on Quake1 and a little Quake2.
      Half-Life 2 uses the Source engine, which is a modified Havoc engine, which is as much a Valve creation as Quake was.

    3. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently you believe that if there is a problem with hardware or a driver, one cannot code a workaround in one's own application. The fact that patched versions of the game did not exhibit the same symptoms does not by itself show that the problem wasn't with the drivers or the hardware.

    4. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Source isn't ITSELF a modified Havoc engine, rather it's MERGED within Source.

      Havok = physics engine
      Source = everything else engine (gfx, sound, blah blah)

      I'm not a Valve fanboy.

    5. Re:Huge surprise. by Sevn · · Score: 1

      That's one way of looking at it. Another way is that a professional company doesn't do what valve has done in the past and say "too bad you are screwed. we can do NOTHING about it". Then repeat that over and over and over again while the most popular graphics cards don't work correctly with their product. Then magically they do something about it 10 months later. A PROFESSIONAL company does whatever they can for their customer. Valve is not that company, or hasn't been in the past. I'm willing to entertain that perhaps they have changed. I sure hope they have. I'd like nothing better than for HL2 to completely rock and give me something to play until Doom3 comes out. But given their recent NVidia problems, it looks like the same old shit all over again.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    6. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmmmm

      "I'm sorry that you don't like our steel belted radial. We have determined that the problem is your car. You are going to have to buy a brand new car to use our tire, and no you can not return the tire for a refund. We are sorry there is simply nothing we can do about it."

    7. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My feelings exactly. Why should I have to buy an ATI card to play their game because they are too lazy to make an optimized path for FX chipset cards? I spent a whole ton of money on an FX5900 specifically to play games like Doom3 because ID said it was the fastest card for Doom3 months ago. If I rememeber it is 15 percent faster than the fastest ATI card with his testing. How could an NVidia card be 15 percent faster with Doom3 but 80 percent slower with Halflife2? Typical Valve comments. It's all someone elses fault. Well, I'm NOT going to buy a new card so I guess they don't get my business. Just like with HalfLife it's a bunch of shit and they'll patch it and it will work fine after 6 months.

    8. Re:Huge surprise. by Firehawke · · Score: 1

      You can't blame Valve for Nvidia's problems. There's a known issue here, and they've said even with the NVIDIA-SUPPLIED optimizations, it doesn't run the way they'd really like it to. This is a fault in the card, not the software.

    9. Re:Huge surprise. by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

      Maybe this is OFN but i remember seeing doom 3 at E3 a in 2002 and they were running it on an ATI card. They said that it was optimized for ATI because of some fancy feature they have that nvidia doesn't.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    10. Re:Huge surprise. by rwven · · Score: 1

      LOL i had to laugh at that one... im glad someone cleared that up for this poor guy. The source engine is a completely original work by valve... The HL engine was actually a completely rebuilt Q1 engine. Nothing to do with the Q2 engine... they downright "bought" the Q1 engine from it's creators and rebuilt it. hence the reason they were able to get graphics as "good" as those out of the Q1 engine

    11. Re:Huge surprise. by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      Actually, it was mainly because ATI's fastest product at the time was way beyond what NVidia was capable of providing. NVidia had a lot of delays getting their latest cards out. Apparently the newest NVidia cards do run Doom3 a little faster, but that is using a special renderpath that is lower precision, among other things. Using the 'standard path' ATI is using, they get about half-speed.

      That said, ATI's cards are definitely faster nowadays.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    12. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "they are too lazy to make an optimized path for FX chipset cards"

      Actually they did put in an optimized nvidia code path. Try to pay attention.

      Invalid Form Key: Chances are Slashdot's software sucks.

    13. Re:Huge surprise. by Sevn · · Score: 1

      You obviously do not know the history behind Valves problems with HL and the lies they told related to drivers and hardware problems. There have been numerous problems in the past with ATI, NVidia, and other cards with HL and they always said "it's the drivers" or "it's the hardware". Then they silenty release a patch many months later. So unlike every other game company that doesn't care what the problem is, they blame it on something else then fix problems "when they get around to it". I can remember a problem I used to have with rage card that made all walls in counterstrike invisible. It was like a free wallhack from Valve. Everybody bitched about it and, big surprise, "It's the drivers". Well, the drivers never changed but the next HL patch fixed the problem. So yeah, when ID has no problems making Doom3 work fantastic with the FX cards but Valve is having problems and is quoted as saying "ATI cards are just 3 times faster" when ID, who nobody can disrespect says that the FX cards are faster, who are you going to believe? Who is Valve in bed with again? This is the same old shit all over again. Hopefully Valve can learn some lessons from ID and stay around a little longer. Otherwise they will inspire hatred and ire in their fans and their fans will start looking elsewhere.

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    14. Re:Huge surprise. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...ID, who nobody can disrespect says that the FX cards are faster...

      Over the summer (was it at E3?) Carmack told everyone that the ATI 9800 Pro was running DOOM 3 faster than any other card, including the best NVidia FX cards. The ATI card was used in the DOOM 3 demo booth. Has something changed?

      ...ID has no problems making Doom3 work fantastic with the FX cards...

      NVidia officials have described the FX architechture as "designed to play DOOM 3," so it's not surprising that FX cards could perform well with the DOOM 3 engine and less well with other engines.

    15. Re:Huge surprise. by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1
      That said, ATI's cards are definitely faster nowadays.


      I remember when I would run away from ATI cards. They used to be the worst name brand cards on the market. Ironically enough my next card will be an ATI. The gforce seems to have gone the way of the voodoo, taking the same card and overclocking the hell out of it. At least NVidia still has that awesome NForce chipset.
      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    16. Re:Huge surprise. by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      NForce does rule, though I wish they would be a little more open with the driver specs (don't want to be tied to one OS if I get one).

      It is funny, to some extent, that it isn't even so much the fact that ATI has improved (though they still have), but more that NVidia has dropped the ball themselves that makes them so less popular. Ah well, they could still certainly perform a turnaround.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
    17. Re:Huge surprise. by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

      With both 3dFX and Nvidia it seems that a prologned period as the only serious player in the market has lead to their demise. They seem to slip into a comfort zone where they feel invincible. The irony is that Nvidia bought 3dFX, so you would think they might have learned this lesson already.

      Well maybe they have learned something from it. Branch out and don't paint yourself into a single market.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
  3. Steam by Joff_NZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think one of the major reasons for this is the Steam delivery platform... the servers were hugely overloaded and there were a lot of problems for a lot of people - I expect they're going to try and iron out some of those problems before HL2 gets put out

    --
    The revolution will not be televised. It won't be on a friggin blog either
    1. Re:Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I think one of the major reasons for this is the Steam delivery platform... the servers were hugely overloaded and there were a lot of problems for a lot of people - I expect they're going to try and iron out some of those problems before HL2 gets put out

      I get it. Steam, iron out... Clever bastard.

    2. Re:Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Specifically, it is the problems they had with Steam that have made a lot of people lose faith in the quality of Valves products. Most of the gamers I know have gone from "GOTTA GET ME SOME HL2!!! R0XX0RS!!! OMG!!!111!!!" to "Dude, Imma wait and see if it SUXX0RS!!!!!! YOU BUY IT KPLZTHX!!!!"

    3. Re:Steam by Soul-Burn666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      ^ A problem they could easily solve by using BitTorrent in thier system.

      --
      ^_^
    4. Re:Steam by I(rispee_I(reme · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well, you see, if they used BitTorrent, anyone with a browser or a third-party BitTorrent client could download their stuff. They'd rather make you install and beta test their reinvention of the wheel so that they can charge all of their customers monthly fees for what was once a "buy-once, enjoy forever" product.

    5. Re:Steam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The sad thing is that this game is so popular that they're gonna make tonsss of money which will only lead to more games utilising Steam technology and more companies adopting it once they see the nice results. Bad, VERY bad for gamers.

    6. Re:Steam by (54)T-Dub · · Score: 1

      You can still "buy it once and enjoy it forever". The steam version basically allows people to try it out at a cheaper rate than buying it. If they play it more than 3 months then valve starts making money on it. You also get additional legacy content (ie: half-life 1) and any new content that they produce (ie: expansion packs, new games, CS 2). Don't get me wrong, i'm still gonna buy the CD in the store, but it'll be great for valve fan boys.

      --

      "I can not bring myself to believe that if knowledge presents danger, the solution is ignorance" - Isaac Asimov
    7. Re:Steam by Scooter · · Score: 1

      Well of course it was slow - what with all those steam powered servers :)

      er..

      Is that my coat?

      Thanks :P

  4. One has to wonder by ReyTFox · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Whether it's worse for their PR image and sales to delay the game or release a mess. Considering the level of anticipation involved, it might go either way.

    1. Re:One has to wonder by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 1

      Well, sept. 30 was never an official release date was it? I didn't see any huge posters with that on it (actually, I haven't seen any HL2 posters).

    2. Re:One has to wonder by BrookHarty · · Score: 1

      Compusa has it listed as Sept 30th.

      I'm still waiting for Duke Nukem Forever!

    3. Re:One has to wonder by Sevn · · Score: 1

      Amazon HAD it listed at Sept 30th also, but now they have it listed at December First. Who wants to bet cash it isn't ready by Christmas?

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    4. Re:One has to wonder by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Since when does Amazon or CompUSA count as official?

    5. Re:One has to wonder by Sevn · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah. I'm sure they both just pulled the date right out of their ass. They made a release date up and were not told one by Valve. What is your point exactly?

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    6. Re:One has to wonder by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      They usually do pull release dates out of their asses, and many people repeatedly asked Valve what the date was when the Sept. 30th date came out, and every store was reporting something different (usually much later). Valve confirmed the Sept. 30th date on quite a few occasions. Take a look back at the E3 press releases, as that's when Valve announced both the game and the release date.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    7. Re:One has to wonder by Sevn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So.....

      I was wrongight?

      hehe? :)

      --
      For every annoying gentoo user, are three even more annoying anti-gentoo crybabies. Take Yosh from #Gimp for example.
    8. Re:One has to wonder by Gogo+Dodo · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Delay is far better as long as the delay isn't too long (see Duke Nukem). If you delay the game, but then come out with a smash hit, nobody will remember that it was delayed a few months. However, if you publish too soon and get slammed in the reviews for not working, you're toast and will never make up the good will. You don't see many "Game v1.1" reviews out there.

      Initial impressions make all the difference.

  5. Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by pommaq · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I knew this would happen. Valve have sort of a... history with this. Team Fortress 2, anyone? In this post-Daikatana world (sorry) perhaps they should have taken a hint and reined in their hype machine a bit. Goes for ANY game developer who isn't 100% sure they can deliver on time.

    Oh well. Either way, I'm not holding my breath. Yeah, it could be an awesome game, but haven't we seen enough hyped games *cough*Black&White*cough* fail to deliver on their promises? I was going to wait for the reviews anyway.

    1. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by ymgve · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I seriously want to hurt anybody who drags TF2 into a HL2 delay discussion. TF2 was only delayed because they had this little game called Half-Life 2 they wanted to work on instead, and they wanted to use its engine for TF2 also.

      I bet that before 2004 is over, both TF2 and CS2 will be released. Just wait and see.

    2. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How much? You won't bet much if you are smart. You definitely wouldn't bet your life on it and you know it or you really don't know valve very well.

    3. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by fireduck · · Score: 3, Insightful

      this isn't entirely true. Half-Life Fortress was announced prior to HLs release. All online retailers had both products listed. So I think there was the expectation in Valve's mind, at last, that it was going to be released as a retail mod soon after HL was released.

      That obviously didn't happen. To appease all the people who bought HL in anticipation of Fortress, they released the free conversion of Team Fortress. At that point they announced that Team Fortress 2 would be a retail product to be released when it was finished. This was years ago, and the product has been demoed in various forms for quite a while now. Demonstrations of the voice - lip synching technology, screen shots, ingame video. I think Valve had every intention of releasing TF2 prior to HL2.

      Presumably, they'll actually release it after HL2, but who knows...

    4. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

      I am definetly not surprised. Valve is getting a good reputation (from me anyway), of taking there time, and not bowing to publisher pressure, which like the music industry, is a rare, (but very good position for the consumer and producer), that can produce the very best (and sometimes the worse, it is possible to add/fix too much) of products...

    5. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd only add the word "eventually" as Valve has never ever ever released anything that didn't have fucked up serious bugs out the door. Then they release a half a billion patches that make some shit worse. HL started feeling right around 1110.

    6. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by inkless1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly.

      1) They announced TF2 years before they announced HL2

      2) They showed video and screens of TF2 years before they announced HL2

      iow, TF2 was supposed to be out well before now.

      My theory - TF2 was abandoned long ago, and the tech that worked has been roped into Counter-Strike. VOIP, new map views, spectator servers - all features they were using to hype TF2.

      There's no way Valve has the bandwidth to be producing both games at the same time. If we see TF2, it will be in 2005 or 2006. And it will be nothing like it was originally conceived.

    7. Re:Anyone surprised? Anyone? Bueller? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unfortunaly the people who know if the game will be delayed or not (The developer) has little or no control over release dates or hype. The release dates/hype are controlled by the publisher.

  6. Christmas sales by KDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Blatantly they want it out for christmas to get all that xmas present money...

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
    1. Re:Christmas sales by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would make sense accept that Valve is notorious for making promises and not keeping them. However, it is in character for Valve to delay a release for X-Mas. Much like it is like ID to sandbag about a release date then surprise people by releasing something months or even a full quarter before they said they would. I wouldn't be surprised in the lease if Doom3 came out for christmas. Carmac and gang get SUPER pissy when people *cough ATI cough* release information early, so they pull the hokey misinformation campaign bullshit. They've done it before. Anything could happen by X-Max.

    2. Re:Christmas sales by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 1

      Maybe I just cut ID too much slack, but I think you're not giving them enough credit. ID are probably about unique in the software development world that in they never give a release date until they are confident that they can make it and they include additional time in case there are unforseen problems. Yes, sometimes a really immense problem can push the release beyond that, but ID do it the right way - give no release date until a date is fairly certain, add on a safety margin and release when the game is done, even if that is before the advertised release date.

    3. Re:Christmas sales by fireduck · · Score: 1

      I've never really bought the Christmas release date, at least when it comes to the A+ computer games (which HL2 presumably will be).

      Blizzard has *never* released a product near Christmas, despite several rumors that they would. Starcraft was hopefully going to come out holiday season 97, but instead was released April 98. Diablo 2 came out in early November, when it presumably could have been held back a month or so. The worst was the original Diablo which, as I recall, was released in January 97 (the 4th, if memory serves correctly). And just about every Blizzard game has set new sales records

      There's no point holding a game as popular as HL2 until a holiday season, as it is going to sell through the roof no matter when it is released. Holiday releases are for the smaller games that perhaps don't have the visibility. Release during the holiday, when it'll be brand new and prominent on the shelves and when everyone will be at the mall.

  7. Old News by __aafkqj3628 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Isn't this old news? Valve has made the announcement that they are going for a holiday release ages ago.

    Besides, we all knew they wouldn't meet their release date, no game does. What are you all so disappointed about?

    1. Re:Old News by op51n · · Score: 1

      Nope.
      Lombardi himself, even in this months PCZone in the UK, (after the interviewer was advised by PR staff the interview would be cancelled immediately if he asked - suspicious...) said that Sep 30th was still the release date. Now, anyone in the last few days thought it could go gold and out in 5 days?

  8. This is news? by VenTatsu · · Score: 2, Informative

    I find it some what amazing (and then in a way I don't, people have such short memories) that so many people are surprised by this. Let's not forget that HL was delayed well over a year from it's original release date. The HL-SDK was delayed again and again, and was a bit buggy at release. TF2 is still vaporware. Steam has had a less than stellar launch. While I'll admit to being a hopeless gameophile that will preorder HL2 no matter the release date I at least will be expecting it to be a good 3 months after I collect my copy before I own a playable game.

    1. Re:This is news? by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      at release. TF2 is still vaporware
      I think the only software that wasn't vaporware this past few years from Valve was "Steam".

      Hu hu hu. :p

  9. Holy Fanboy BATMAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dear PhlegmMaster,

    We here at Valve appreciate you backing us up on Slashdot. Even though it is obvious that we fucked up badly with Steam, and most people see our mistakes for what they are, it is nice to know that our marketing has worked on at least 10 percent of our fans. Please call our offices tommorow so you can receive a free copy of HL2.

    Sincerely,

    Gabe Newell

    1. Re:Holy Fanboy BATMAN by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ARROWED!!!!!!!!

      hmmmmmmm. come to think of it...

      CEREBELLUMED!!!!

  10. Wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I guess they really are following the microsoft business model after all!

  11. In Other News by Red+Pointy+Tail · · Score: 3, Funny

    Half Life 2 has been renamed Half Life: Forever.

  12. hey? by beredon · · Score: 1

    I heard it was going to be released on October 15. Maybe I'm getting muddled up.

  13. It's done when it's done by imperator_mundi · · Score: 1

    The philosophy of the Duke Nukem developpers seems to have caught new disciples...

    I'm pretty sure that Half-Life Chapter 1 is a compelling legacy, and that all what Valve want is to not daikatanize it, so I am just fine waiting for something good.

    As Yoda said (possibly while "playing" Angel of darkness) "If you choose the quick and easy path, you will become an agent of evil".

    Just hope I'm not waiting for good (Duke where are thou?)

    1. Re:It's done when it's done by Gudlyf · · Score: 1
      Shouln't that be:

      "If quick and easy the path you choose, become an agent of evil you will."

      --
      Trolls lurk everywhere. Mod them down.
  14. Laughing my butt off! by xQuarkDS9x · · Score: 1

    This news doesn't suprise me in the least! Watch - come around the end of December it still won't be out then VALVE will say it'll be out by April, then pushed back again until September 2004 and maybe by then the STEAM problems will be ironed out and it will have been delayed another year. Just like Microsoft products. :D

    --
    You must master your joystick like a fisherman masters bait! - Gimpy
  15. No truer words have ever been spoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Spokan? Spokane? Washington? Something like that. Gabe Newell is a whiner. And he has gained some weight I noticed. But he whines more than Rusty Wallace (Note: for non-NASCAR fans Rusty Wallace is a guy that whines a lot whether he wins or loses.). Spokin?

    1. Re:No truer words have ever been spoken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gabe Newell is a whiner. And he has gained some weight I noticed.

      Gained some weight? He looks like he got trapped in a Dairy Queen freezer for the past year or two.

      Did you every seen the original scene from Episode 1 with Jabba the Hutt? Not the computer generated re-release, I mean the scene with some actor playing Jabba and he spoke English and walked around. Now, if that was the real Jabba the Hutt and he morphed into the puppet Jabba the Hutt in ROTJ, that would still be nothing compared to the transformation that Gabe Newell has gone through. The fat fuck.

      I'm just glad I didn't plonk down $300 on a video card this week just to play this game, or I'd hunt Gabe down and beat the fucking $300 out of his fat ass. But he'd probably try to run from and and only get about 10 yards before his poor little heart said "fuck this" and he fell over dead, his bloated carcass spilling into the streets like jello.

  16. i hate steam. by fireduck · · Score: 4, Insightful

    as I mentioned in the previous thread on Steam, I have had nothing but horrible experiences with it.

    Valve tells everyone to download the steam+content version (the 300+ mb file) after the small steam file fails for a lot of people. Sure, I got that, install it (after scouring the net looking for a site that doesn't have a 300+ person waiting list). And when I go to install the games that already have the content in the steam file, it instead goes to the net to download it. ??? I want to play Day of Defeat, it takes me 2 days to eventually download the content (even though there's a 358 mb file already sitting there).

    And the program doesn't even really tell me that it is downloading stuff, unless I go out of my way to find out. You click a game, and it freezes the system nicely. One has to alt-tab, back to steam, to check the monitor to see what's going on.

    First time you then actually play a game, for some reason it takes 10-20 minutes to validate resources. And during this point, I don't know if it's validating or downloading new content (as it apparently has done both on me).

    There is NO way they can use this to distribute HL2. Gamers want their games now. They don't want to wait 3-4 days to get a game online, when they can drive to the store and go home 15 minutes later with the product...

    1. Re:i hate steam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So we can see the positive effects that their relationship with Microsoft have produced!

    2. Re:i hate steam. by brkello · · Score: 1

      I don't know what the heck you did, but I didn't have a problem at all. Downloaded steam, it convertied my CS to 1.6, found a server using steam, double clicked on it, and was playing right away. Some items are popular to download on the web, that's not valve's fault. Just run the download over night like every normal person out there. I don't doubt you had/have lots of problems with it...but I think the majority of people don't have any problems at all. The people who do have problem are the minority, they are just very vocal about it.

      --
      Support a great indie game: http://www.abaddon360.com
    3. Re:i hate steam. by wpc4 · · Score: 1

      I must agree I hate steam too. Although in it's defense the steam+content package that has all games is nearly 800mb. Sounds like you got just the CS+HL+Steam one.

    4. Re:i hate steam. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please stop calling it Steam, and use its righfull name "Sierra Utilities" thank you.

  17. Valve respect ... by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... just went down in my eyes.

    Don't say anything you can't do. If you have to say "When its done" up until its in boxes waiting to be FeEx-ed then do that.

    First you said Sept 30, then denied when your parent company said the end of the year, then days before the deadline, you say you can't get it out.

    Get your crap together.

    --
    The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    1. Re:Valve respect ... by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 2, Interesting

      First you said Sept 30, then denied when your parent company said the end of the year, then days before the deadline, you say you can't get it out.

      Valve doesn't have a parent company...

      As for respect for Valve going down over this, I'm amazed anyone is surprised. I've been waiting for one game from Valve for 5 years. TFC took my mind off of it for a while, but frankly Half-Life wasn't a product I wanted or even care about.

      Until Valve releases any game on time I'll expect their releases to be late. In fact, the only reason I'm not waiting for them to scrap the game engine like they did with Half-Life and Team Fortress 2 is simply because they kept their mouths shut about HL2 for so long.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Valve respect ... by dswensen · · Score: 1

      How about if they just ship a half-done game, like so many other developers out there do, and then patch the egregious truckload of bugs later? Would they earn your respect then?

      Seriously, they didn't have to delay it. They could just fob off an incomplete piece of junk on the public and probably still make money.

  18. I wish I could believe by wowbagger · · Score: 1

    I wish I could believe that Valve was reacting to the negative press about Steam and DRM, and was busily reworking things to remove the dependancy upon Steam in HL2.

    I wish I could believe that Valve was working with Icculus.org to make HL2 for Linux.

    Unfortunately, I don't. I beleive Valve IS working on Steam, but not to make HL2 less dependant upon it, but rather more so, so that no matter how bad Steam is, you will be FORCED to use it to play HL2.

    Oh well, as George Thourogood said, "that don' confront me", as I don't plan on downgrading my OS to play HL2. I'll just wait for Doom3, and play that instead.

  19. A delay is fine with me by elliotj · · Score: 4, Funny

    As someone who will have to upgrade my PC to place HL2 and Doom3, I welcome the delays. The longer Id and Valve wait, the more power I can get for my money.

    Take you time guys.

  20. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  21. delayed for... by Tom7 · · Score: 2


    Delayed so that they could add in real time shadows after seeing the Doom III tech demo. ;)

  22. Not all delays are evil... by wickedj · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Valve's original Half-Life was an incredible game although very buggy (but fixed with patches). I have no doubt they can release a similarly excellent game. Just because it's delayed doesn't mean it will be infinitely delayed.

    Blizzard for example is notorious for delays in releasing their games. But when they do, they are, in a word, spectacular.

    As far as Steam goes, yes it's having major issues at the moment. But you have to give Valve credit for trying something different (I'm not saying new because I know that someone has probably done it before). If they can get it to work properly, more power to them.

    It would be great to see developers released from using publishers. It means lower prices for us and more creative freedom for the developers.

    1. Re:Not all delays are evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe you should let Valve try to make the apology huh?

    2. Re:Not all delays are evil... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It would be great to see developers released from using publishers. It means lower prices for us and more creative freedom for the developers.

      HAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA.

      It really means:
      1) No quality control
      2) No financial stability
      3) No customer support

      Pretty much all product releases would go how Steam is going RIGHT NOW (if a game ever made it out the door at all). Forget that, you don't want it. Sure games would be cheaper, but there would be nothing out there worth buying. If having a publisher is so bad, why does id, Blizzard, et al. still use them?

  23. give it time by rwven · · Score: 1

    give it time... Halo PC comes out on weds Oct 1st (or Sept 30th in some places) and it looks to be killer. there are a LOT of people who have a sneaky suspicion that Halo is going to overtake CS after given some time... I'd suspect as much after reading some of the previews i've read about it... we shall see...

  24. I've beenl waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    for Duke Nukem Forever...

    or should that read "i've been waiting forever for..."

    In anycase, there's a few other FPS in the pipe coming soon (unless also further delayed).

    UT2004
    Halo PC
    Doom 3

    Personally, I'm eager to see how Halo PC compares to UT2004 with regards to vehicle combat.

    HL2 better have some excellent tricks up its sleeve!

    1. Re:I've beenl waiting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd rather see Marathon for the PC than Halo. Crazy AI's were for more entertaining than the the the the the the repetitive levels of Halo.

      I'll wait for H2. Happily.

  25. Is anybody really surprised? by ziggy_zero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Especially seeing that Amazon.com has had a "November" release date for awhile now, while Buy.com has said "December" for quite some time.

    --
    I belong to the ______ generation.
  26. Must feel stupid by WapoStyle · · Score: 1
    Jeeze Valve must feel a bit stupid right now. They have been so very adamant about their Sept. 30th release. Now just a few short days away they decide to delay it.

    I am looking forward to Half Life 2 and I was really hoping to have played through it before Knights of the Old Republic comes out. Oh well, Sept. 30th was nothing more than a dream anyway.

    As for Valve credibility, I don't think they ever had mine to begin with. Sure I can think of ONE game they made that I liked. Hell, I can't even think of any games by Valve besides Half Life. Until I see a phenominal Half-Life 2 or something else, Valve will just be a one-hit-wonder.

  27. What amazes me... by JFMulder · · Score: 0

    ... is how they could say 3 weeks before a game launches that it would be ready, and two weeks after they realise they still have another 2 months to work on the game?

    Unless he was teasing us with the September 30th launch date. It's dissapointing, since I would expect that sort of behavior by a marketing person or a lawyer, but not a game programmer.

    If they said 5 months ago that it would be ready on the 30th, and now announced it was going to hit the shelves in two months, I wouldn't mind, I mean, you can't always predict things like this. But now?

    Maybe they saw the last Doom3 demo and decided to improve a little more?

  28. Half Life Forever! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    In other news insiders have spotted Duke Nukem in the halls of Valve's offices.

  29. Wow...seems like retailers have known a while. by zoobaby · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you check here http://www.ebgames.com/ebx/product/235059.asp

    You will see a ship date of Nov. 14th. It has been at that ship date for a few weeks. I have learned to check what dates retailers are using as ship dates before I get too excited.

    1. Re:Wow...seems like retailers have known a while. by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      if you check here http://www.ebgames.com/ebx/product/219676.asp

      You will see a ship date of Nov. 14th err... 2004. It has been that ship date for a few weeks. I have learned that retailers pull dates out of their ass.

      Yes, I am still waiting for Valve to ship the second game they promised, rather than a game they never promised until this last E3.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
  30. Half-Life and Doom 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Just read the preview of Doom 3 that just came out. Kept wondering.

    1. Okay, when I played Doom, I didn't notice much of a story. Just a lot of aliens running about in James Cameron-land.

    2. Now, we're told that Doom _had_ a story. Seems that scientists were doing research that got out of hand, and suddenly creaturs from another planet began zapping in through the Dimensional Vortexes, or something.

    3. Which was Half-Life's story.

    4. Not only that, but in Doom 3, we now have nonplayer characters, like injured scientists, who offer assistance and aid to the player. These are not cut-scenes, but are rendered in real-time in the game engine.

    5. Which was Half-Life's biggest innovation over Quake.

    I get the feeling that Doom 3 and Half-Life 2 will continue to be delayed, as they each encounter delays in order to play catch-up to the other's latest media release.

    I say we make'em show each other their games, and give'em a two-month deadline afterwards.

    1. Re:Half-Life and Doom 3 by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 1

      1. Okay, when I played Doom, I didn't notice much of a story. Just a lot of aliens running about in James Cameron-land.

      2. Now, we're told that Doom _had_ a story. Seems that scientists were doing research that got out of hand, and suddenly creaturs from another planet began zapping in through the Dimensional Vortexes, or something.


      Doom's story was told mostly through text between the major episodes. It had something to do with fighting monsters from Hell, and then (towards the end of the game) going into Hell to stop them from coming through.

      3. Which was Half-Life's story.


      It wasn't like it was hard to get the script, like I said, Doom's story was told through text on the screen. Pay someone to change Hell to Xen and pay some modelers to build some new creatures. Find a better way to tell the story than text on the screen, and turn all of the keys into scientists and security guards, who can easily be killed, thereby depriving you of the keys and forcing you to restart from an earlier save.

      No, I didn't like Half-Life.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    2. Re:Half-Life and Doom 3 by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Doom 1 did have a storyline. It was in the readme file. Heres a copy online (its AOL hosted so it may not be up for long) : http://members.aol.com/ledmeister/doominfo.htm

      ' For the last four years the military, UAC's biggest supplier, has used the remote facilities on Phobos and Deimos to conduct various secret projects, including research on inter-dimensional space travel.'

      Half-Life's story about teleportation? Sorry, but Doom had that nailed down. And incorporating the storyline into the gameplay? The best incorporation of a storyline into games back then were a few lines of text, Doom outdid that with text followed by a PICTURE!

    3. Re:Half-Life and Doom 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hah, top comment, mate. You always have something insightful to say here in the games section, and i'm enjoying your contributions, but this one was great. I thought i was the only one who didn't see what made Half-Life so revolutionary or exciting. To me it went from Doom (much scarier than anything before) to Deus Ex (much more involving than anything before). Half-Life had a story, but it was... aliens are coming... err... that's about it. Deus Ex just twisted into deeper and deeper conspiracies, which was great fun.

    4. Re:Half-Life and Doom 3 by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a reality show in the making.

  31. Sorry, this is my fault by Zed2K · · Score: 2, Funny

    I asked Valve to delay it so I can put off purchasing a new PC until after Intel drops the CPU prices. Sorry to all those looking forward to HL2, but this is really all just because of me.

    Or so I keep telling myself.

    1. Re:Sorry, this is my fault by spooky_nerd · · Score: 1

      Yeah, me too. I can't afford a new PC right now, so I asked Valve to delay HL2 until I have a bit more cash. Once I get that new computer the game will come out. If you want the game out sooner just mail a new PC to me at . . .

  32. Mod Parent up, informative by gumpish · · Score: 1

    Thanks.

  33. Steam to blame? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmm, not surprised to see HL2 delayed, only surprised that they didnt announce it until a week before the expected release. Thats a bit poor in my eyes, when they know a lot of players are upgrading machines and some probably even booking holiday time to play this game. The delay, well if its necessary then fine, but it would have been better if they were upfront and honest about it as soon as it's evident. Have to wonder if the late announcement is mainly down to the Steam problems?

    Steam, well nice idea. By the sounds of it, too gung-ho though. Why jump right in? I think they could have chosen a more... defensive way to do it, something which gives them more oppertunity to "learn by doing" before committing all their eggs. Even a more simplified single system - e.g. buy the game as normal, which gives you complete singleplayer indefinately, multiplayer indefinately if you use "normal" methods, plus 3-6 months' worth of Steam services. You could then extend that with a subscription.

    Less load, less that can go wrong, and less of an impact when it does. Granted that would mean less DRM control and wouldnt give them such a big cut of the RRP, but small bites are easier to chew & swallow etc etc. It's no surprise that there are problems with Steam, pulling it off would have been a remarkable feat IMHO anyway. The only real critisism I think is fair is that the problems were nearly inevitable, yet so much relied upon it. TBF they seem to have had the backup plan of this external download, but that seems to be failing even more badly...

  34. Mod Parent Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's basically responding to a troll. Just because the first poster was too ig'nent to know the story of Doom doesn't mean we need other people being misinformed as well.

    HL ripped off Doom, and no amount of hoping on your part will change that.

  35. Delayed eh? by James_G · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Gabe Newell sent us a mail letting us know that the 'news' posted on Shacknews yesterday (story) is a fake and that Half-Life 2 has gone Gold and in production now. Here's the official word: "The release will still remain on schedule for Sep 30th. People who have pre-orded it via Steam will still get it before the Sep 30th but we are currently ironing out a couple of bugs, people may have seen Half Life 2 yesterday for a minute on it while we were in our testing stages (...) The SDK will be available for download tomorrow 2.00pm EST. Now you've heard it from the horses mouth so rest assured. More news to follow on Sep 26th so watch this space."

    From http://www.gamershell.com/news_BHalf-Life2BGold.sh tml

    Which site to believe? Who the hell knows?

    1. Re:Delayed eh? by samsmithnz · · Score: 1

      I've seen another reliable site confirm that it is gold, straight from the horses mouth so to say...

      damn HL2 & UFO: Aftermath all at once!

    2. Re:Delayed eh? by jameslore · · Score: 1

      GamePlanet (http://www.gameplanet.co.nz/), the 'gaming news' site of one of NZ's big online game stores announce this morning it was delayed. 11:30am (NZST) they updated to say they had just been informed it had gone gold.

      Short answer is who knows?

    3. Re:Delayed eh? by jameslore · · Score: 1

      I stand correctly. Latest opinion is that the gold email's are all fake. Headers certainly seem to indicate it.

      All would be helped if Valve would actually own up to something....

  36. How about some Play in "Foreplay" Valve by space_hippy · · Score: 1

    I wish they would at least release a one level demo/play test or something. Come on keep out interest, please.

  37. Source of the email - AKA proof it's fake by Enucite · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Source of the email sent to Gamershell.com:
    ==
    Delivered-To: news@gamershell.com
    Received: (qmail 10758 invoked by uid 1004); 24 Sep 2003 22:53:19 -0000
    Received: from gaben@valvesoftware.com by ymer by uid 1001 with qmail-scanner-1.14
    (avpdaemon: ???. Clear:.
    Processed in 0.030965 secs); 24 Sep 2003 22:53:19 -0000
    Received: from mta01-svc.ntlworld.com (62.253.162.41)
    by 0 with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 22:53:18 -0000
    Received: from smtp.ntlworld.com ([81.96.191.237])
    by mta01-svc.ntlworld.com
    (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with SMTP
    id <20030924225325.GGIY2260.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@sm tp.ntlworld.com>
    for <news@gamershell.com>; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:53:25 +0100
    To: "" <news@gamershell.com>
    Reply-To: "Gabe Newell" <gaben@valvesoftware.com>
    From: "Gabe Newell" <gaben@valvesoftware.com>
    Subject: Half Life 2 Gone Gold
    X-Mailer: Ghost Mail 5.1 http://ay.home.ml.org/
    X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
    Message-Id: <20030924225325.GGIY2260.mta01-svc.ntlworld.com@sm tp.ntlworld.com>
    Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 23:53:25 +0100

    Half Life 2 as gone Gold and in production now, the release will still remain
    on schedule for Sep 30th. People who have pre-orded it via Steam will
    still get it before the Sep 30th but we are currently ironing out a couple
    of bugs, people may have seen Half Life 2 yesterday for a minute on it
    while we were in our testing stages.

    The announced delay is all rumors posted up on Shacknews
    and the SDK will be available for download tomorrow 2.00pm EST
    now you've heard it from the horses mouth so rest assured.
    More news to follow on Sep 26th so watch this space.
    ==

    If you know how to read the headers even a little bit, you can see that it was sent using an anonymous mailer (Ghost Mail 5.1) and sent from a UK-based broadband provider (ntlworld.com).
    1) Gabe Newell doesn't use an anonymoust mailer client for sending email.
    2) Gabe Newell doesn't use a UK broadband provider for sending email.

  38. Typical by ZeeCog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Everyone here claiming that they've lost respect for Valve and are now going elsewhere will be playing the game the day it comes out and raving about how cool it is. Mark my words.

    --

    -Zeecog

  39. Its all about Communication... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Now personally I would have preffered it if companies like Valve would be more responsible to their public. I recall when they praised how all the feedback from their players is what helped them shape the world and engine of Half-Life 2. If it's honestly unintentional, its more sad and pathetic than anything else. If its intentional, do they honestly think messing with us by dangling a release date close by for as long as possible is worth it? Yeah I've fallen victim to being hyped about the game, but I wish companies would CHOOSE to be more honest about their expectations and information. Steam worked for me for a while, but I admit it was incredibly buggy... hope they fix it somewhat. I sorta have respect for VU now sadly, as they seem to be more realistic about the situation. If they are JUST holding out for the christmas present season... Its despicable, really... why not have the foresight to at LEAST plan that ahead and plan all games to release every year on christmas.