Slashdot Mirror
Microsoft Taking Over the BIOS
dtjohnson writes "According to this story,
Microsoft has entered into an agreement with BIOS maker Phoenix
Technologies to integrate the BIOS with Windows. This has the
potential to turn PCs into Windows-only machines and also could result
in widespread incorporation of Digital Rights Management (DRM)
technology into new PCs. It looks like Microsoft is beginning to
flex their marketplace monopoly muscles again, after taking a couple of
years off."
This is no different of what Apple is doing for years with the Macs: MacOS/X requires Apple's special BIOS to boot and work with.
Looks like we need to start checking to be sure our next motherboard's flash can be reprogrammed with LinuxBIOS.
so now the bios wont be reliable either?
I, for one, welcome our new BIOS controlling overlords.
I, for one, welcome the day when people realize that joke just isn't funny anymore.
All your overload joke are belong to us!
Basic Insecure Operating System ?
Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of
Now, I will not even require an OS in order to contract and spread viruses and worms.
It's only a matter of time before Microsoft's superior technology inovators develop a compression algorythm that will allow them to stuff all of Windows XP/2003 into the BIOS chip. Then they will really have a lock on the PC industry.
Remove the chip and get a new one if you want dual booting or linux. There has to be a hack to overwrite the BIOS mem. I am no chip expert by far, but is it really possible for them to entirely by hardware mechanisms to make it windows only?
Say hello to Linux on PPC. Or, for that matter, some BSD flavor on PPC. Speaking of BSD, there's always the Mac OSX option.
First, this is different from Apple?
Second, it will take less than a week for someone to figure out how to access the new BIOS and make linux bootable
Third, there will be plenty of chipset/mb makers who won't do it and you will see "linux" bioses or switchable bios chipsets depending on what the user wants. Linux has enough of a movement that chipmakers and bios makers probably won't ignore them.
MicroSoft is undoubtedly up to no good with this, but we don't need to go Chicken Little without a little more evidence...
Bush: He's Liberal in all the wrong ways.
Damn... Now we're going to be opened up to get viruses that attack BIOS!
Since most modern operating systems (i.e. also Linux) use the BIOS nearly exclusively during bootup, I'm not so sure if this has much impact... you will have to be able to boot an OS anyway...
Also, Phoenix is only trying to do in the mainstream what has already been introduced for servers, namely better system diagnostics independent of the sanity state of the OS running.
What's to keep the LinuxBIOS project (or something similar) from doing the same thing?
While we may not like it, it's just the logical progression.
Besides, if the BIOS "API's" are available to Windows, how long do you REALLY think it will take for open-source developers to reverse engineer it?
Apple has no BIOS on a chip anyware. Yes, there's Open Firmware, which is an open standard -- you're NOT locked into any type of control by Apple. You can run Linux on them. You have full control. THAT'S how it's different than Apple.
Oh, you mean the old "Apple ROMs"? That's been ancient history for at least four years, maybe more. There's no more Mac ToolBox on ROM -- it's all loaded into memory from the hard drive.
I am very, very concerned about this move. I run Linux on my Intel box with the current motherboard. Anyone got a good supply of fast PPC motherboards? I could do Linux that way, I guess....
--Jim (me)
Could you explain to me exactly who the lot of companies are? It is my belief that corporations as a whole will either not care at all or will regard this as a very good and important feature that will allow their operating system of choice(Windows) to operate more reliably and securely thanks to DRM and Trusted Computing blah blah blah
Most corporations will welcome this with open arms.
"The BIOS would also allow better control of unauthorised devices connected to a system, Microsoft said. "
So, what is MS going to define as unauthorized? I don't fear them making the machine MS only, as I doubt that would fly with their recent monopoly troubles in court, but I do fear the definition of "unauthorized devices".
So, perhaps they mean, CD players that don't use DRM and can rip audio tracks to mp3? That would be a unauthorized device?
If so, thats bad. If microsoft, in any way, starts preventing me, on a hardware level, from deciding what I want to do with my files, I'll give up MS at home and work.
Right at the end of the article you will notice that the users will have an option to turn off the DRM...
Macs havent had a BIOS for years--not in the traditional sense anyway. They use Open Firmware, an architecturally-neutral BIOS replacement (originally?) developed by Sun. It's pretty nifty...
More info here.
Is there a definitive point in time, a single event that started this all?
DRM this, RIAA that, MPAA my freakin head is spinning. When did DRM become so damn vital to companies like these? Was it napster that freaked everyone?
Because of all this crap, A friends ISP got shut down because someone complained to his upstream provider that one of his users was sharing software, no warning, no proof, no due process...crazy.
I spend $6000 on an HDTV last year that is already obsolete because it doesnt have the flavor of the month DVI copyrite protection connector. Hey man, check out this bad ass new DVD player that upconverts to 1080i, oh what you dont have DVI with HDCP, oh im sorry youre fucked. We had the 15pin RGB connector, then component video, then firewire, then DVI, then DVI with HDCP, and now we have HDMI. make up your freakin minds.
Or how about a cd I bought that would play in my high end REGA Jupiter cd player because it had copywrite protection.
I upgraded my video card and had to reactivate Windows XP on my workstation at work. What a pain in the a$$ I paid for the windows license.
This shit makes physically ill to the point where I want to start firebombing some of these companies.
I obviously blame these corporations and industry groups, but what started it all? Why are they so convinced that anyone using a computer is out to ruin them.
Why am I being affected by all this crap, I dont fileshare, I dont rip CDs for friend, I dont steal cable. Im a somewhat honest consumer, why am I getting nailed with all this crap that really isnt going to make ANY dent in actual piracy?
Are you listening to me Microsoft, RIAA, MPAA, Sony, Adobe, Disney and all you other fuckers. You cant stop piracy, all youre doing is driving me freakin nutts, and Im your paying customer!!!
For DRM to have any measure of success, both hardware and software must be closely joined. A software only DRM solution will fail due to the ability to take the storage media to another software (OS). A hardware DRM solution would work, but updating for new file formats would allow a back-door for hackers.
Taking over the BIOS should be just one step toward implementing a total DRM solution. The next step is securing storage media - maybe a 'smart' drive that handles file interaction for the OS and whose internals are hidden (for example - OS/user doesn't need to know/control format on drive).
Apple is a monopoly only to those who wish to purchase Apple products (which is a single-digit segment of the market). Microsoft, on the other hand, has been found in numerous courts to be a monopoly on the desktop system market and has been found to utilize illegal methods to enforce such a monopoly. A marriage of hardware to the OS should be illegal in such a circumstance (lack or perceived lack of choice for the consumers).
In short, your comparison is one of "Apples and oranges" and is therefore invalid.
I have something in common with Stephen Hawking...
Oh, the irony.
Of course. Because this Justice Department has shown itself to be the ever-vigilant foe of monopolies, Microsoft in particular. It only took a six-year, multimillion dollar lawsuit among a dozen states and the federal government to end up causing Microsoft to do exactly nothing...
Don't look to the DoJ to fix these wrongs -- Microsoft has the $$.
The Mongrel Dogs Who Teach
All your overlord joke are belong to us!
I should start charging $699 everytime somebody uses my name . . .
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I can't believe this garbage coming out. I had to replace a low end server the other day, and the OS (yes, I was forced to use a Server 2000 OS) was more than the hardware! Now M$ is trying to get their hands in that too? Will it ever stop? God almighty, if 3k isnt enough for M$ to get from a low end server, then what is? 3k just to M$ to be able to use the "BIOS" they copyrighted? Take that with a grain of salt, or a rim of salt! Come... Come to my island.
"The BIOS would also allow better control of unauthorised devices connected to a system, Microsoft said."
Why is a protection against "unauthorized devices" suddenly necessary on BIOS-level? Has anyone even been victim of a device that should really have been "unauthorized" (whatever that means in this case) that has been connected to a PC? It sounds like they're talking about hardware, and that's what's puzzling me. Are Microsoft telling us that future devices might be set as "unauthorized" because they don't fulfill Microsoft's demands and standards for an authorized device, or what?
Are Microsoft's customers saying "we should be able to protect ourself against unauthorized hardware" (I'm not hearing anyone), or are Microsoft just trying to shove a new feature down their throats because they need it for their plans?
"Phoenix's Core System Software (CSS) is a next-generation BIOS with a more sophisticated integration of operating system and hardware, for example making it easier for system administrators to remotely monitor the hardware configurations of their systems."
As with all computer software, complexity increases the chance of bugs and often also security exploits. How can Microsoft and Phoenix assure these "enhancements" to the BIOS don't do this? They can't? Well, then we might have an interesting future with really messy exploits ahead (with potential for viruses to gain direct hardware access and control), and also BIOS crashes due to the added complexity.
Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
Your BIOS will be assimilated. Resistance is futile!
Next Microsoft will be selling cube shaped PCs with eerie green lights illuminating it. We must stop the collective from growing.
The BIOS OS integration on the Mac has always been a thing of beauty, and it makes sense that M$ would (after 20 years) start to catch up by now.
Except Apple sells PCs and Microsoft doesn't. Apple also used a customized version of OpenFirmware (stripped down version of Sun's OF, IIRC), while Microsoft is making it's own BIOS. Microsoft isn't catching up, they're trying to drag the whole PC market into their realm of control.
So when is China (being the modern purveyor and possibly last hope of open technology) comming out with their own bios?
Next you're going to tell me Microsoft made something called a 'winmodem' that only worked on windows. Sheesh don't get worked up thinking so much. I just sit back and let Clippy tell me what to do.
Outdoor digital photography, mostly in New Engl
Microsoft and IBM together invented the PC. If anyone should complain, it should be IBM only.
Actually, IBM alone invented the PC. Microsoft just bought an existing OS that happened to be written for the processor IBM chose to include in the system, and changed the name before presenting it to IBM as their own work.
It was mighty nice of them to later give the real inventor of DOS a job (even if he still was never cut in on the distribution profits).
So no, Microsoft had no real affect on the PC except to later on make it (for a while) so that everyone who bought a PC was forced to run their OS.
That is the way it was from the beginning.
So we should all just go back to using an Altair? Don't be a horse's ass.
I have something in common with Stephen Hawking...
I can hear it now. On trying to install Linux, "I'm sorry Dave, but I can't let you do that"
__ Someday, but not this morning, I'll finally learn to use the preview button.
Maybe a few years ago, this would be frightening, but as it stands, it is far too late to fear the PC industry being locked into Windows. Even if you think the home user base is unimportant, IBM, Dell, HPaq, Sun, Racksaver, and others have a significant investment in Linux in particular, and even if MS managed to get all the current independent motherboard companies on board for this, most any of those players would easily overcome it to keep the Linux revenue stream going.
You have Clustering, server farms, web hosting, and a not so insignificant workstation and desktop market that is heavily leaning in the direction of linux (dominating the first three, and making very serious inroads into workstations and power user desktops). That's a whole lot of revenue for the likes of the big companies to just shrug and give up at Microsoft's whim.
XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
One only has to wonder how long before TCPA chip will refuse to load Linux BIOS loading only "trusted" Windows BIOS which will of course never load "untrusted" GNU OS. Truely scary perspective especially considering the fact that back in 1997 we all thought The Right to Read was a huge overexeggaration. I think it is time to renew my EFF membership. I believe everyone should do that instead of just complaining on Slashdot.
Sincerely,
Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
"Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
There aren't any drivers for other motherboards. If there were, you could install Mac OS X on any PPC motherboard. Mac OS X hides the drivers from you, though. In the System 9 and earlier days, there was a kind-of driver called the System Enabler. All of the Mac systems and motherboards are different, needing different code to run the parts.
It has NOTHING to do with Open Firmware, which is mostly a bootloader.
Oh, and you CAN run Mac OS X on a generic PPC motherboard -- run PPC Linux, and install the Mac On Linux virtual machine (not emulator). You can run a lot of Mac OS', including Mac OS X. I've not tried it myself, though, since I have real Macs.
--Jim (me)
This in turn means that Dell et al will either
Indeed. And if MS emulated this all you would have to do to run Linux would be. . .
Buy a Windows license, install it (making much HD space "worthless"), and boot it (making you need to comply with their EULA).
Cool. Who woulda thunk that it would be Microsoft who discovered the way to make big bucks from Linux?
Do you mind if I sit this one out?
KFG
All kidding aside... I write BIOS code for a living, and this scares the crap out of me. What Microsoft wants is to basically eliminate the BIOS, except for the jump to the OS code (the "int 19" above). Windows already does just about everything that we do in the BIOS, like PCI device enumeration, etc...
No doubt, this would make Microsoft's life a lot more simple, but I think it would give them too much control -- way too much. DRM would just be the start of it.
I wonder what the EFI proponents (Intel) think about this deal...
The Microsoft BIOS will be called "Microsoft Control Program," or MCP for short.
End of Line.
Don't forget that IBM still uses their own BIOS.
Of course, they were also the first on the block with a TCPA implmentation.
(HPaq also has their own BIOS for server systems. And judging by the copyrights on a Dell, it looks like they are using a forked version of a very old Phoenix BIOS, not Phoenix's latest and greatest.)
Yeah, DRM will be optional for a while. But when 90% of users are switched over to Windows2007, then banks will start to require DRM enabled computers to do your financial transactions over the web (balance transfers, checking the mortage status, etc.). Then the Powers-That-Be(TM) will decide that in order to crack down on terrorists, all on-line banking transactions will have to use a computer with DRM (and it just so happens that all transactions will also be simulatneously logged on IRS computers). Then on-line retailers will get in the act. First the Amazon's and E-Bay's will start to require it to reduce fraud. Then the banks will stiff-arm *all* merchants to only allow credit card transactions from DRM enabled machines. Of course on-line bill paying will go the same way. And now since the majority of people have these computers, other web-site operators will start to think "What kind of 'hacker' is visiting my site without a properly 'secured' browser? And what kind of data mining can I do now that I have a guarenteed identity behind the computer that I can sell to someone else!" So as more companies start to jump on the bandwagon, Grandma complains, "Some ladies in my knitting circle can't see my blog!" So the blogging software companies have to also incorporate DRM. Finally, the only people left using non DRM computer will be linux enthusiasts and criminals/terrorists. And since these two groups are about equal in size it'll be about a 50% chance that any web-surfer using a non-DRM computer is a criminal. Finally, DRM will be mandated by law and all objectors will be (secretly) rounded up and quitely disposed of (via the Patriot VI Act). So I know that I sleep sound at night knowing that DRM is *optional*.
Perhaps they are just acquiring BIOS code to integrate into their devices and embedded OS? Maybe we will see MS Media Center devices that lack a typical bios chip?
Everyone, sing along:
Open Firmware Song
I'm a PC maker, MS comes to me with deals.
***MS gives a discount if they only install Windows on all their machines and refuses to sell any without OS's on them** Ok, I can deal with that, there aren't any alternatives right now and if they come up in the future, we can always renegotiate.
(Competition is completly decimated as all the large manufacturers do this)
*Bigger discount if you don't include the CD or documentation.* Sounds good to me.
(More money for redmond.)
*We'll also give you a discount on microsoft brand keyboards and mice which you can rebrand and we'll sell them to you for cheaper than you normally make them. We'll also give you a great discount on office if you promise not to carry anything else* Sounds good.
(Gets your company locked into microsoft products even more.)
*All of your machines require this BIOS in order to run windows, we'll give you another discount if you install them.* Sure, I can go with that, more money for me, w00p. I can always pull out of the agreement later.
(More lockin to windows products, now you've got to change your company somewhat in order to throw them in. At first it's inexpensive, they give a discount, and after a year or 3, they jack up the prices)
*Windows now requires that you use these cheap, fritz chipped celeron processors.* Sure, I spose I can since all my stuff is based off of windows anyway and at this point changing my company will cost millions.
(Microsoft now implements DRM on computers and a lot of bullshit like changing the hardware config requires a call-in to microsoft, opening your files from a different OS is more difficult, etc.)
*Windows will only work with windows-based chipsets, which only we sell and lisence now, they're cheaper than other motherboards.* Er..ok...sure I guess. Makes sense, and the corperate people like it so ok.
(At this point, microsoft will eliminate the motherboard market, giving them control over everything prettymuch. Processers can be dealt with, but motherboards can't. They at this point start eliminating manufacturers 1 by 1, accusing them of bogus bullshit and infringing on their patents on the motherboards now proprietary buses)
*The motherboards can now only run microsoft parts in a microsoft case. You need to buy microsoft parts and microsoft cases, but unfortunatly, they'll cost you 5 times as much as it costs us.) Fsck...where's linux? Where's unlocked fritz'd processors? Motherboard manufacturers? Help meee...
(Microsoft now has complete control over the PC market. And since they have so much more control, they become even more powerful and eventually take control over world goverments since windows is running on everything. They use blackops to take over the goverment using nazi-like tactics, accept they just assassinate anyone who they don't like and twist the media their own uses)
Hackers, at this point, being driven far underground and forced to be a very militant breed (think gattica), exploit bugs in the now somewhat secure Microsoft windows systems which are a modified version of linux in order to eat and live and help their communities. The roaming poor people, unable to find food or shelter and thrown out into the streets because all of the manufacturing and distrobution is done by robots and machines(Think of all the chain stores becoming automated), turn to these hackers for help and education. The black market thrives throughout an underground wireless network which uses wireless devices long ago banned by the goverment. Hackers are persecuted as is thought crime.
The normal people live as slaves in archeologies and are never allowed to go outside but are terrified of all the violent evil people who regularily kill cops and hurt people, a war is regularily burning overseas with china or some other distant country. In 2-3 generations, the archeologies have become full of loyal sheep, while the hackers have become extremly hard
Candy-Coated Knowledge
If Windows can run faster and have better control over the hardware with this BIOS, then Linux can as well.
Come on, guys.. this is Slashdot! Are you forgetting that a very large pool of very bright individuals read this forum? Phoenix will release the specs for this new BIOS, the kernel hackers will develop a patch to support it, and before you know it, the same benefits that Windows O/Ss gain from it will be found in Linux as well. Minus the DRM, of course.. although I wouldn't be surprised to see that as a patch either.
If MS can benefit from this, so can Linux. The only way that wouldn't be true is if the specs are not public, or are licensed under a RAND license that precludes OSS participation and nobody wants to foot the bill on our behalf. Or if Phoenix tries a DMCA ploy of some sort. I can't picture them charging a license fee for using it when they can more easily enforce an outright fee for the supporting MB installation. Even so, I wouldn't be surprised to see it reverse engineered. Look at WinModems and their rise of functionality under Linux..
---
er.. um.. excuse me. I meant GNU/Linux.
uhm mate, you can run osx on most new-world ppc machines.
HOWEVER, Apple doesnt allow it as per the license agreement.
"There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do NOT wave in a Vacuum " --Arthur C Clarke
There's also AMI. Also, I really have to wonder if machines with locked-in BIOS sets are going to suffer the same fate as DIVX discs, Microsoft's "Bob," and all the other weird ideas that litter the technology graveyards.
Speaking for myself, I can say with confidence that I would NEVER, under ANY conditions, buy a system that's been locked up as the article describes. I will NOT tolerate some megalomaniacal company telling me what OS I can or cannot run on a system that I buy/own.
The good news is that a move like this could certainly be a shot in the arm for the used computer industry, considering all the systems that are pre-DRM/pre-BIOS insanity/etc.
Bruce Lane, KC7GR,
Blue Feather Technologies
Microsoft is clearly not a monopoly on the PC market. Why, what... with compeditors like....... err
Unauthorized devices means two different things:
1. Hardware that isn't approved by Microsoft. A Lexmark printer is currently "protected" against third-party ink cartridges by an encryption scheme (which, in the US, is in turn protected by the DMCA). This will allow Microsoft to do the same with every component in a PC. You won't actually need to buy all your hardware from Microsoft, of course, but hardware manufacturers will need to obtain MS's (expensive) authorization. To prevent a backlash against a huge extension of the MS tax, Microsoft will spin it as something like "compatability assurance" or "security testing".
2. Non-DRM hardware. Pay-per-view movies and pay-per-play music won't generate much revenue for the MPAA/RIAA if the consumer can simply hook up the media player (which is what the PC will become) to a VCR or tape recorder. You'll need MS-approved, DRM-crippled monitors and headphones.
Microsoft claims that unathorized devices are a threat. In particular, they say that Palladium (of which this BIOS is a crucial part) will prevent hardware keystroke sniffers, by encrypting everything between the keyboard and the PC. The problem with this argument is that the encryption keys are held by Microsoft, not the computer owner.
I can see all the thick-skulled cops now..
"Sonny, you clearly circumvented technological security mechanisms by using illegal software (MS didn't give it a run-license) to install Linux. You clearly broke the law and now it's federal pound-me-in-the-ass prison for you. Don't drop the soap, sucker! I despise scum like you."
I hope people will keep in mind what legislation of technology does when they whine to their congressmen about spam. When you beg the government to make certain emails illegal, they have to define "illegal email". Now are you sure you would like the US Congress to define "illegal email" _for you_?
"Microsoft said integration should mean simpler and more reliable computers."
I cant believe in the face of every virus MS has been responsible for spreading or allowing to spread due to crappy code they think a BIOS with MS system calls in it wont be a problem.
I can see the next ms.blaster worm that wipes your bios requireing you to replace the ROM.
unless it was deliberately implemented
I wonder if MSFT deliberately implemented the "feature" of not recognizing any non-MSFT OS on your harddrive, so that in order to dual-boot you need to make sure you install Windows _before_ you install Linux, etc.I think the problem here is MSFT is the 800lb gorilla, whether it was deliberate or not, it works in their favor to not work well with other OSes, so from a historical standpoint, it's likely there will be little glitches in the BIOS, that make it difficult to use non-Windows OSes.
Another great example is the Winmodem. To the happy consumer, looks like great idea - save money, put all the hardware of a modem in software, vendor sells a cheaper modem .. but customer gets a slow, cheap modem that only works on Windows.
I doubt that IBM, Dell, HP as well as many fortune 500 companies that run Linux on the server would allow this to happen.
Of course, none of these companies probably gives a damn if Microsoft maintains control over the desktop.
This space left intentionally blank.
...doing so would be illegal under the DMCA...
It might come as a shock to some.here's a whole lot of this planet that doesn't come under the auspices of either America or the DMCA. I piss with great force on your DMCA! Within a day there'll be a fix for this that the rest of the (non-American) world will be able to use and enjoy! Ha!
You're using her as bait, Master!
Dell does their own Bios.
Perhaps they want to stop things like this program that installs a VxD audio recorder. It installs itself as a sound card makes all the DRM you have useless.
Load encrypted file, Verify Rights, Decrypt Audio Stream, send result to sound card which saves it straight to Wav, MP3 or Ogg. Thank you very much.
Actually this is why I bought it. I consider it a very nice audio conversion program that works with all formats. Better then SoX!
"The BIOS would also allow better control of unauthorised devices connected to a system, Microsoft said."
hmm... and what exactly classifies as "unauthorized devices" and who decides?
This could be a security plus if the control were in the hands of the users, but even then I can't really think of any situations where this would be needed. I don't know about you, but i have never had an "unauthorized device" in my computer. Obviously the system will be in the control of Windows/M$, definately not something we want.
A distinctive mark, characteristic, or sound indicating identity
This is probably going to turn out to be nothing, just like those rumors that HL2 would only work on nVidia cards.
I've upped my standards, so up yours.
In fact, it was Compaq Ahh ... here's the story
- The Compaq Portable was the first 100% compatible IBM computer clone. Why make an IBM clone? Because the IBM PC was extremely popular, and taken very seriously by businesses looking for a computer system.
In any case, you would think Bill would remember this. He was around. Unless he's getting daft.Problem: Compaq couldn't just copy IBM's BIOS to make their new machine guaranteed IBM compatible, this would be illegal, and easily proven by IBM.
Solution: Reverse-engineer IBM's BIOS. Compaq used two sets of programmers, one group who had access to IBM's source code and another who knew nothing about it. The first group closely looked at the original code, and made notes of exactly what it did. The second group took these notes, and wrote their own BIOS that performed exactly the same. After one year and a million dollars, they were successfull. They had a legal BIOS identical in operation to that of the IBM computer.
"It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
Just great, now i can count on getting the latest virus/worm of the week in my BIOS now.
Wow! Now I won't have to wait for the POST to finish before I get a Blue Screen.
But to the hardware vendors, having a hard-wired way of differentiating 'workstations' from 'servers' could be a real gold mine. Traditionally, there are many 'server' tasks at sites that get filled by the secretary's old desktop machine.
There's even something of a precedent for using the BIOS to partition machines into different market segments. I once bought a surplus Alpha motherboard that was really cheap at the time, intending to run Linux or NetBSD on it. When it arrived, I found that it had only the crippled BIOS capable of loading Windows NT, and that it was going to be a complicated kludge to get anything else to run. I found someone in Australia who had paid money for DEC's SDK, necessary to recode the BIOS to run a Freenix, but he wasn't willing to share it. So that $150 motherboard, minus the $100 more I would have had to spend to enable it to run a Freenix, became dead hardware to me. And yes, I looked in DEC's catalogue. Back when the motherboard was 'current' hardware they were selling the same exact motherboard with the bios to run Windows NT for a low price, and with the bios to run Digital UNIX for a HELL of a lot more.
A Good Intro to NetBS
I'm seriously trying to remember the last time I was on slashdot, read one of the chicken little "Microsoft is going to cause the sky to fall!" stories and it turned out to be true.
Hmm... Been reading since 1997 and can't think of a single instance.
Looks like someone has a bad track record, and it isn't Microsoft.
All the Beowulfed clustered Natalie Portman hot grits belong to Signal 11.
Okay, moderators, do your duty. This is all off-topic.
Ever have nostalgia for the old Slashdot? Here you are:
What do training bras teach?
War is God's way of teaching George Bush to find Iraq on the map.
50% of everything is below average.
The Thesaurus was prehistoric reptile with a great vocabulary.
How do they get Teflon to stick to the pans?
How do you know if you run out of invisible ink?
The cost of living is high, but it remains popular.
"Why does everyone always overgeneralize?"
Any attempt to brew coffee with a USB teapot should result in the error code "418: I'm a teapot".
Ethernet - A device for catching the Ether Bunny.
Why do hippies like Oregon? Because there are no jobs.
I'd like to back up my hard drive, but I don't know how to put it into reverse.
Flying Rule #1: Keep the pointy end forward.
The white zone is for loading and unloading only.
I've lost my faith in nihilism.
"Ah yes, the Tomahawk Cruise missle... the rich country's car bomb."
I'm in search of myself. If you find me before I arrive, please have me wait.
If Bill Gates had a nickel for every time Windows crashed...
AAATMA - American Association Against Too Many Acronyms
The metric system is the tool of the devil!! i get forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way i likes it!!
Moderating trolls and flames as "Offtopic" is Unfair and will be metamoderated as such.
It all started when I thought that inflammable was the opposite of flammable...
If you are angry with someone, you should walk a mile in their shoes. Then you'll be a mile away, and you'll have their shoes.
Unless I woke up in crazy-verse this morning, no way every chipset, motherboard or cpu company (Cough..AMD Cough) would ever allow it to become a standard. So, net result, Phoenix wastes/spends R&D resources on a hunk of silicon that they have to patch every 14.666 minutes. Maybe they sell a hunk of windows only machines, but it will never become the standard, not even Intel would be that stupid.
And microsoft would get bored with it...
do NOT fool yourself into thinking DRM was purely some kind of evil scheme to Get Your Money.
I agree that it did not start there, but it has rapidly become obvious that it now is more about getting all of the money (yours, mine, everyone elses).
Regional encoding does not stop piracy, neither does encrypting DVDs. People just copy them with the encryption entact and they play on your regular DVD player. The "regional" thing is about wanting to control who sells DVD decryption tech along with the players, and about controlling who was allowed to sell players where.
I expect the RIAA wishes they had thought of that one, imagine a studio owned software company recieving fat royalty checks for every CD player sold. As DRM becomes more ubiquitous, expect to see that and other ncorporate market controls coming down the pike.
And you can also expect the studio owned (AOL) and software vendor owned (MSN) attempt dropping non-DRM content from thier networks as well. Corporate censorship for the web, in the name of protecting the artists, writers and musicians. If it's not DRM, it must be copyright infringing!
So Well use encryption accross the network to avoid this.
BUT NO! You must be a terrorist! If you don't have anything to hide, why are you hiding it? Only drug dealers and terrorist need to use encryption if they're not law enforcement, corpoations, and intelligence agents, but that's OK, because they are the GOOD GUYS looking out for your saftey, the ecconomy, and the "American Way of Life". "Patriot Act III", DMCA-II, all brought to you by the Department of Justice, Homeland Security, and Microsoft. Keeping America safe for Americans. (I hope you fit their definition.)
[/RANT]
In all seriousness, if a large company can profit from DRM, or a government can control or monitor a population by use of DRM, by manipulating the markets (and content) in the software, communications, media, film, music, and publishing industries with this, then they will eventually attempt it.
At least in America (and many other countries), the outcome is somewhat dependant on the public's acceptance of this and the perception of a need for it.
We can always hope.
Read, L
We'll still be able to hack away on our (ever increasingly) obsolete computers.
Also, take a look at the 8-bit computer enthusiasts. These guys know every inch of their 8-bit computers, and can make them sing. You can probably build one from scratch from common chip parts. The 80886? (err...i'm drunk) Assembly is out there forever, and we can always program on that.
My point is, that even though our dual 3 GHz machines will become obsolete by the time your prediction comes true, we can always hobble along on our own computers. What it takes engineers at Intel to make today, they'll be teaching high schoolers in 20 years. (see 8-bit paragraph above)
Due to saving money for a house, I have been hobbling along on my 400mhz AMD computer since I built it in '98. Can't play the new games on it, but I can still rip & encode [my] CD's and DVD movies on it. Just what the RIAA and MPAA wouldn't want me to do today.
All I'm saying is that your prediction of comptuer armageddon isn't going to happen so quickly or overnight. Blu-ray discs are coming out 'real-soon-now' for the last 2 years. Your 3 years? 5 years? is probably more like 8 years, 10 years. Scared of the BIOS market being stolen by M$? I envision Open-BIOS becoming a reality. Chip burners are becoming cheaper and more common. We can make our own. Or know someone that does. Also marketplace ca$h is what's going to drive all this. China/Malaysia pirate capital of the world will be the last place that moves to DRM. They'll continue to fill the market with non-DRM bios because there WILL be a market for that for a while. Thus add another 2-3 years to your armaggedon date.
Why are there only 19 people folding@home for slashdot?
Don't assume just because we use Linux personally that we don't face the reality of using Windows in our professional lives. I run a whole server room full of Win2k boxes. They are garbage. Do you know how much time I've spent installing patches and rebooting locked/frozen/fried boxes? My disgust for Microsoft comes from years of experience with their products, not just their predatory business practices.
On the other hand, I also run a bunch of AIX and Linux boxes. They run some of our most critical applications. I never have to reboot them. I will repeat that. I NEVER have to reboot them.
Yes, Windows 2000 is better than Windows 95. Big deal. My wristwatch is better than Windows 95.
Microsoft board room meeting:
Presenter: "We're going to sell a PC. But we can't really let people do what they want with it. We need to protect it. With a bios! Ya we'll protect it with a bios!"
Bill: "What are we going to call it?"
Presenter: "Well we need a symbol.. that represents not being able to do what you want."
Bill: "X?"
Presenter: "Yes! And another symbol that suggests it already does what you probably need it to do."
Bill: "XBox?"
What? only shell gas will fit into my car..? Well, i'll show them.
First software, I believe. It's been getting more and more important for companies to protect their products. First came CD keys for online play. People came up with CD key generators.
Uh first came online CD keys? Try again. Floppys with bad sectors (King's Quest anyone), hardware dongles, serial numbers, sheets printed in unreasonable colors, I've got a full binder of stuff you needed to run a game in the old days. In fact, the scaling back to a simple CD key is because they finally figured out it wasn't effective and it pissed off your legitimate customers.
I use Daemon Tools also on my own, legitimately purchased CDs. If necessary I get the required crack so I don't have to look for the damn CD (if you knew my room, you wouldn't question why). Personally I see it as the last left-over of a time past. True central online services like MMORPGs or the UT2003 central server require CD keys, but for those I consider it part of the ToS for connecting to them, not a copy protection, at least not an effective one.
I recently went back to Windows 2000 from XP. Why? Because when I copied my XP installation from my 120GB disk to my new 160GB disk, XP freaked totally and mentally. Couldn't get to a reactivation screen, nothing. Wouldn't allow me to install over either, just wierd errors. I can pretty safely say, it'll be a cold day in hell before XP or any future XP-line OS ends up on my disk ever again. By the time Windows 2000 is EoL'd, it'll be Linux. Tried using the Red Hat server in the corner as desktop, now if only I didn't miss my Windows apps that much...
Morale is: Pirates will manage to pirate it. Do not piss off your customers in the futile process.
Kjella
Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
This might not be as bad as it sounds. Within a few years, Linux will be running on many large business and government systems around the world. We may be MS-centric here in the US, but the rest of the world is looking at alternatives.
Someone will have to supply the hardware of the future to these new Linux users. There will be plenty of businesses who will cater to the non MS users of the world, and if you think Asia and India, someday they may outnumber the Windows users.
There is nothing so powerful as an idea whose time has come.
I still favor Linux over Windows when it comes to stability, but there are several other facets of the Windows operation system and Microsoft philosophy that turn me (and likely other Slashdotters) off. First, security. I don't like my browser or mail client doing things I'm not explicitly aware of. I cannot use Windows with a clear conscience because of IE's and Outlook's persistent security failures. Add in IIS for Windows incarnations with IIS installed an running. This is compounded by the fact that these pieces of software cannot be uninstalled. I don't really care about the monopoly angle with the bundling of IE/Outlook. Linux distros "bundle" similar items if not more which I like. The difference is that if someone finds a bug in Mozilla that puts me or my network at risk, I can wipe it clean from my hard drive and fall back on alternative software packages.
Cost is another obvious difference, but one that I think will eventually catch up to Microsoft more than any antitrust case or business practice. It's evolution, baby. The personal computer is still a wonderful, versatile thing. I use it to write, program, listen to music, watch movies, capture/edit/burn digital video, and game. But it isn't a new concept on which a business can build on and dominate market share any more. There are a growing number of open source software projects that meet or even exceed their commercial competitors capabilities. OpenOffice, Mozilla, and Apache to name a few. There's three software projects right there that are relevant to the corporate world's preoccupation with information technology.
Commercial software that meets a need or niche that open source solutions cannot fill is going the way of the dinosaurs. They had their chance, but it's not the way I see software evolving. Why depend on a single commercial source for solutions when you can support a core group of developers in producing a piece of software that everyone can benefit from?
I don't so much find Windows to be inferior. It's just that Linux and the canon of open source software built upon it make so much more sense financially, socially, and from an engineering standpoint.
If we all send Phoenix an email they might get the message that a lot of people don't want this.
The lazy can cut and paste the one below and send it to custsupport@phoenix.com
The less lazy might want to change a few words or write their own email.
---
Customer support,
I don't believe your recent deal with microsoft is going to work out
in the interests of your customers.
Microsoft aim to make it harder to use other operating systems on the same
hardware as theirs. They are using their existing monopoly in operating systems to produce a monopoly in BIOS software. As alternative operating systems become more widespread your new BIOS will be less competitive in the marketplace.
This deal will also cause your customers to become suspicious of your motives and less inclined to choose your BIOS where others can be used.
Personally I don't intend to buy motherboards with your BIOS, or recommend that any of the companies I work for do until this deal is cancelled. It is important to me that hardware I buy is general purpose and can run linux or FreeBSD as well as windows.
Regards,
-Your Name-
There is a better way. My alpha has two different firmwares: SRM for Tru64 (Digital Unix) and OpenVMS operating systems and ARC for Windows NT. I can switch from SRM to ARC using command: "set os_type nt" and then "init". If I want to go from ARC to SRM I just choose "switch to OpenVMS or Digital Unix console" or something like that from ARC menu and power-cycle the machine.
The Alpha architechture specification actually (if memory serves) does not define any console firmware. This means that the OS vendor can write his own firmware for his own OS.
I think it would be great if PCs had these features:
1) There could be multiple (at least two) firmware images stored in firmware chip
2) OS developers could develop their own firmware
Then if someone could port OpenBoot/OpenFirmware (used in Sun UltraSPARC and Apple Macintosh systems) to PCs...
Someone will have to supply the hardware of the future to these new Linux users. There will be plenty of businesses who will cater to the non MS users of the world, and if you think Asia and India, someday they may outnumber the Windows users.
Yeah, that's true. There will always be someone selling motherboards with real non-Billified BIOS.
But, given Microsoft's security track record, should we even be worried? X-box was designed with a lot less attention to retaining backward compatibility than a motherboard will require by the very nature of the PC market. That backward compatibility gives one attack vectors to break the BIOS and get their computer back, and yet even without those loopholes, X-box can run Linux. I predict that it will be less than 2 weeks after their release before some 15-year-old has put up an exploit that allows you to boot *your* computer with the operating system *you* choose.
Fire and Meat. Yummy.