i have to agree with that though, seriously #debian at freenode and at other networks are just fucking sad, mostly because of the abundance of elitists and zealots..
just wait until they start going "you fucking piece of eurotrash, you are just jealous of us americans" me? oh i'm going away nz/asia atleast there they are upfront about it i.e "fuck the law, the law goes BUBBA on you"
but seriously this sheit is starting to creep me out...
that would ofcourse be "WASTE" i got a mirror of it up at signal.fearmuffs.net
runs just dandy under wine.
but you have to take into consideration that if you encrypt the traffic, sure they cant see what you are mangling through the routers BUT they will see that you are still mangling a shitload of traffic.
heh actually i've been admining a vax/vms big-F*CKING-HONKING-IRON redundant mainframe that had been rebooted something like 3 times in 10years... first it was used for the inhouse thinclients and for climate modelling (or whatever the bearded ones liked todo when they'd see it fit)
Sonork is the one you might want to look at, sonork.com
send me a draft of the features you're looking for and i'll try to squeeze them into modules for the client/s. We're working on the new clients for v.2
first part is agreeable. but the second part is... fud, all the information ive read is microsofts own and by people that know;D professors and cto:s , and well as someone said there are things in pd i like and things im afraid of...
you must be the troll 2k , everyone I know in the security bussiness dont like this due to its implications and the people I know who are technically adept and into politics see the "1984":ish scenario coming into play.
This is a technology that shouldnt be.
"The control still remains with the end user. By design, the user determines what is trusted and what is not trusted. And privacy is always protected, and that protection is backed by hardware."
er the OS (palladium) decides what is trusted , otherwise the certificates are useless, and the certificates are issued by microsoft.
Read the documentation availible. and the reviews by people who know... for a minor hint on that look for palladium and cryptogram on google.
just on loan? since it is still, according to most of you , property of microsoft, then what the hell are you Buying it for? My point being buy a cheap top end ps2/ps1 and use the existing *nix ports.
It is my firm belief that as long as you enter partnership with MicroSoft one would not face this dilemma (or buying the sdk) so buy it, partner up but please stop whining like the little brother that got sucker punched...
Slashdot Mirror
all i'm gonna say is this, http://funroll-loops.org , Enjoy Zealots!
uhm mate, you can run osx on most new-world ppc machines.
HOWEVER, Apple doesnt allow it as per the license agreement.
i have to agree with that though, seriously #debian at freenode and at other networks are just fucking sad, mostly because of the abundance of elitists and zealots..
http://www.securityfocus.com/archive/1/333510/2003 -08-12/2003-08-18/0
linkage!
yes gnome is so unstable it hurts...
Seriously though stop smoking whatever it is you trolls smoke...
so do the apache /longbow/ pilots still wet their panties when they hear about the hind and the havoc? *G*
just wait until they start going "you fucking piece of eurotrash, you are just jealous of us americans" me? oh i'm going away nz/asia atleast there they are upfront about it i.e "fuck the law, the law goes BUBBA on you"
but seriously this sheit is starting to creep me out...
that would ofcourse be "WASTE" i got a mirror of it up at signal.fearmuffs.net
runs just dandy under wine.
but you have to take into consideration that if you encrypt the traffic, sure they cant see what you are mangling through the routers BUT they will see that you are still mangling a shitload of traffic.
i remember that quote..
;D
"it'll be ready when its ready" -- Carzten Haitsler aka. Rasterman of enlightenment fame, concerning the release of E17...
Does this mean they are basing Longhorn on e17, does this hold a premise, a future so bright, Microshaft longhorn/linux
You be the judge!
*cough* http://www.distributedcity.com *cough*
heh actually i've been admining a vax/vms big-F*CKING-HONKING-IRON redundant mainframe that had been rebooted something like 3 times in 10years... first it was used for the inhouse thinclients and for climate modelling (or whatever the bearded ones liked todo when they'd see it fit)
hehe you begged for this ;D
let me present you to the
c=one
Sonork is the one you might want to look at, sonork.com
send me a draft of the features you're looking for and i'll try to squeeze them into modules for the client/s.
We're working on the new clients for v.2
mail goes to robert +at+ beunited period org
interesting, is this "atlantis" web browser availible?
So everyone just forgot the blasted worm... :D
We're switching out our routers and servers as we speak to unix...
(postgresql is nice)
nya nya r'lyeh yogsothoth et cthulhu...
what is not dead cannot die and with strange aeons even death may die!
-- hp lovecraft --
first part is agreeable. but the second part is ... fud, all the information ive read is microsofts own and by people that know ;D
professors and cto:s , and well as someone said there are things in pd i like and things im afraid of...
actually the only big players not into this are apple and sgi..
sun, amd amongst others are actually PARTNERS in the TCPA ALLIANCE
im quitting computing and going back to robotics or something now..
you must be the troll 2k , everyone I know in the security bussiness dont like this due to its implications and the people I know who are technically adept and into politics see the "1984":ish scenario coming into play.
This is a technology that shouldnt be.
"The control still remains with the end user. By design, the user determines what is trusted and what is not trusted. And privacy is always protected, and that protection is backed by hardware."
er the OS (palladium) decides what is trusted , otherwise the certificates are useless, and the certificates are issued by microsoft.
Read the documentation availible.
and the reviews by people who know... for a minor hint on that look for palladium and cryptogram on google.
i do consider it really is that funky sheit that arnold smokes in his movies ;D
hmm thats strange im using sshd and ssh from the 2xx branch.. oh well its my imagination then...
t s.com/app/2741
granted the sshd build is a bit flawed but not unsecure.
http://www.bebits.com/app/2894
http://www.bebi
just on loan?
since it is still, according to most of you , property of microsoft, then what the hell are you Buying it for?
My point being buy a cheap top end ps2/ps1 and use the existing *nix ports.
It is my firm belief that as long as you enter partnership with MicroSoft one would not face this dilemma (or buying the sdk) so buy it, partner up but please stop whining like the little brother that got sucker punched...
Do Something...
fyi im a bsd / wxp troll
by my thoughts, that does really look like galeon, oh well.. It has some areas that it can be applicable in, picoBSD anyone?
i still think that we should have it in the copenhagen malmö area. and by the way why use a metric system its flawed.. not to mention illogical..