Slashdot Mirror


Project Gutenberg Publishes 10,000th Free eBook

AndrewRUK writes "Earlier today, Project Gutenberg's founder, Micheal Hart, announced that the project has passed the milestone of 10,000 free eBooks available, with the publication of the Magna Carta.Project Gutenberg was founded in 1971, with the aim of "[making] information, books and other materials available to the general public in forms a vast majority of the computers, programs and people can easily read, use, quote, and search." In the 32 years since the project started, over 10,000 books, ranging from the Bible to school textbooks, and from the complete works of Shakespeare to the USA's declaration of independence, have been made freely available to the public by Project Gutenberg."

281 comments

  1. I guess.. by joeldg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it is time to read up eh?

    I still kind of have issues with ebooks.. I mean, reading is pretty much a tactile thing for me.. I.e. I like the smell of books, I like turning pages..

    In other words, it is nice to get away from the computer sometimes and just read..

    Though, I congratulate their efforts, it is cool

    1. Re:I guess.. by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0

      why not just print them?
      I know, 10,000 books...well some rainforest will have to go, but who knows what can we discover there?

    2. Re:I guess.. by joeldg · · Score: 1

      I would not mind a little foldable pad that could display them, that would be cool.

      God, printing 10k ebooks?

    3. Re:I guess.. by optime · · Score: 1

      Whenever I read an ebook that is not some sort of technical book I get the feeling I am reading a man page or an INSTALL file.

    4. Re:I guess.. by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Funny

      Plus, book burnings. Not as much fun with digital books. `rm -rf /usr/local/share/banned_books` just doesn't have that bonfire drama does it?

      --
      I do not have a signature
    5. Re:I guess.. by joeldg · · Score: 1

      yes.. and shredding does not have the same effect either..

      `shred ~/ebooks/*`

    6. Re:I guess.. by spitefulcrow · · Score: 1

      Whatever happened to all that talk of electronic paper?

      --
      Sorry, my karma just ran over your dogma.
    7. Re:I guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nothing. E-book readers will still come around. Just a few slashdotters grumbling their thoughts out loud, ignore them.

    8. Re:I guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10000 books have burned in the now smoldering server since this story was posted.

    9. Re:I guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But you *could* print them, then shred them, and then burn them...oh nevermind..

    10. Re:I guess.. by realfake · · Score: 1

      Well, there are other nifty things you might want to do with a digital version of a text than just read it. Or format it for reading. I think that's part of the point.

      Some examples of software you could create to process a text, just off the top of my head:
      - a concordance generator
      - a linguistic analyzer
      - a text comparison system

    11. Re:I guess.. by 10bt · · Score: 1

      i enjoy getting paper cuts, can ebooks do that for me? NO. there goes the visceral experience...

    12. Re:I guess.. by EverDense · · Score: 1

      God, printing 10k ebooks?

      Just do what I do, get into work early and use the company's paper and toner.

      ...that's what they're there for. ;-)

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    13. Re:I guess.. by ndogg · · Score: 1

      I wish that bookstores would be like mini-publishers. I'd like to be able to take a file in to them and have them create a nice paper back book for me.

      --
      // file: mice.h
      #include "frickin_lasers.h"
    14. Re:I guess.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      buy a printer, dude!

    15. Re:I guess.. by jmcgarey · · Score: 1

      I have found it much more comfortable moving away from regular books. I open the file in OpenOffice.org, I sit on my couch or recliner in a comfortable position with my laptop on my coffee table. I can just use the scroll wheel on my wireless mouse. Its very relaxing. I also find I read faster when I'm reading these etexts. I suppose its because I pay more attention and am not trying to get from page to page.

    16. Re:I guess.. by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

      i enjoy getting paper cuts, can ebooks do that for me? NO. there goes the visceral experience...

      You've obviously never built a PC in a cheap Taiwanese case, then. Sharp metal edges can be even more exquisitely painful than paper.

      --

      Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
    17. Re:I guess.. by Koatdus · · Score: 1
      I wish that bookstores would be like mini-publishers. I'd like to be able to take a file in to them and have them create a nice paper back book for me.

      At work we have a nice networked Canon copier that has a bunch of finishing options including two sided, booklet, staple and graphics quality. Since most tech documents/IBM Redbooks/etc. are downloadable as a PDF I end up printing little booklets of docs that I am going to want to study for a while. This is not quite the same as a bound book but it is a step in that direction.

      I agree with one of the earlier posts that it is nice to get away from the computer screen once in a while. I find that I retain material much better if I am sitting down somewhere like next to the fireplace in my living room to read. When I am reading on a computer screen I tend to loose my concentration and flit around from screen to screen instead of really reading the material.
      --
      Every wrong attempt discarded is a step forward - T. Edison
  2. ... SCO alleges infringment by charlieo88 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Obligatory SCO joke.

  3. e-reader hardware? by smack_attack · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Are there any decent e-readers for this? I have looked around and all of them want to use some crazy proprietary format or just plain suck. I think those things could take off if there was a good one, I'm game.

    1. Re:e-reader hardware? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

      Just use any PDA. I've read dozens of them on my Visor Deluxe.

      Jason
      ProfQuotes

    2. Re:e-reader hardware? by zenofjazz · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I prefer the palm pilot, myself... smaller than a paperback, long battery life, and very readable backlightable screen... And there are freeware apps that will allow you to take Gutenberg eTexts and convert them for your Palm.
      How much text can you stuff in 8Mb?
      2 full copies of the bible..
      or
      all of shakespeare
      or
      LOTS and lots of good fiction.
      -Jazz

      --
      -- All That's Evil in the Geek Space ... Allthatsevil.wordpress.com
    3. Re:e-reader hardware? by CGP314 · · Score: 1

      I've used a palm pilot to read the txt files. It's the best on the eyes for me.

    4. Re:e-reader hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have a palm PDA, you can convert the ASCII text ebooks into Palm DOC format (look on your favorite freeware site for converter software, i use PorDiBle) which has the file extention .PDB. Then just transfer it to your PDA, and use a doc reader like CSpotRun to read it. Beats reading it off a CRT *rubs eyes* and a nice benefit is if you turn your PDA off or switch apps it still remembers where you left off :)

    5. Re:e-reader hardware? by WillAdams · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Dedicated hardware (ebookman, Franklin reader) hasn't caught on that well.

      I've read a fair number of texts on my Newton, but found a Palm Pilot too small.

      I've read a lot more, and enjoy it more on my pen computers---started with an NCR-3125, moved up to a Fujitsu Point, just got a Stylistic.

      Apparently the Zinio Reader for Tablet PC is well done, haven't tried it yet.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    6. Re:e-reader hardware? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      Yes, Emacs is the best around.

      Some people will tell you that vi is better.

    7. Re:e-reader hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      LESS

    8. Re:e-reader hardware? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Plucker rocks. There's a site that has PG ebooks
      in plucker format too (google should find it).
      Plucker+palm pilot is quite a comfortable
      reading experience.

    9. Re:e-reader hardware? by KingPrad · · Score: 1

      ybook reader from SpaceJock software. It looks great and is free. Although it's nice to kick some money back to the author as thanks. He did a good job.

      Homepage: http://members.iinet.net.au/~simonh/spacejock/inde x.html?http://members.iinet.net.au/~simonh/spacejo ck/yBook.html

      Download link:
      http://members.iinet.net.au/~simonh/Program s/ybkfu ll.exe

      It is only for Windows though.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot Effect! Don't read the articles!
    10. Re:e-reader hardware? by biostatman · · Score: 1

      If you have a Pocket PC, you can get many of the project Gutenberg E-Texts in .lit (MS Reader) format from blackmask. I have found that the ipaq with MS Reader makes for an excellent E-Book reader (not to mention that you can listen to some nice background music at the same time).

      --
      For the love of $DEITY, loose != not win!!!!!
  4. Proofreading by Empiric · · Score: 4, Informative

    Based on someone's post earlier, I gave Distributed Proofreaders a try. It's very straightforward to get started on a couple of pages done at your leisure (especially easy for those knowing basic HTML--like Slashdot posters--think standard bold and italic tags; the only mild ramp up is footnotes), and I found their scanned book choices interesting to be reading through in the process of proofing (well-done proofing interface as well).

    If you're in the mood for browsing books, give it a try... you can find something interesting to read and do a little service for humanity at the same time.

    --
    ~ Whence do you come, slayer of men, or where are you going, conqueror of space?
    1. Re:Proofreading by suitti · · Score: 1
      I read Gutenberg books on my Palm with Weasel. When I spot an error, I create a bookmark. When I'm done with the book, I edit the original (on my computer) and send context diffs to the project. So, I'm only checking books that I want to read anyway.

      I think of myself as a pretty good proof reader. However, in one of the children's books that I've been reading to my son, I continued finding new minor glitches even after five readings.

      If software has a bug per thousand lines, despite the code being checked for syntax and function automatically, imagine how many errors there are in unchecked text. This is an area where tens of thousands of people working in an open environment can contribute to quality, crushing any proprietary effort.

      --
      -- Stephen.
  5. 10,000 books? by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's almost half the Hardy Boys series!

  6. Can't be said enough... by daeley · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Come join the proofreaders that make Project Gutenberg possible!

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
    1. Re:Can't be said enough... by MenTaLguY · · Score: 1

      Ah, but is slashdot really the place to be soliciting for proofreaders? ^_-

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
  7. Re:Anonymous Coward Publishes 10,000th First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You fail it, assbag. Go slit your wrists in shame. You are an embarassment to all AC.

  8. Congratulations! by apsmith · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Now why was my story on this rejected earlier today? Oh well...

    Go to Distributed Proofreaders if you'd like to help out!

    --

    Energy: time to change the picture.

    1. Re:Congratulations! by ichimunki · · Score: 1

      Maybe your submission didn't contain enough errors-- like misspelling one of the most common male first names in the English language. Sheesh, people, it's Michael. How hard is that? :)

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:Congratulations! by Bendebecker · · Score: 1

      Hell, why not just call him Mike? Screw spelling...

      --
      There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
      most of us won't be able to afford it.
      -- Lemmy
  9. Come Help Out by dave2112 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    You can help us with the next 10,000. Join the Distributed Proofreaders Project @

    http://www.pgdp.net/c/default.php

  10. Legal? by twoallbeefpatties · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's odd. What with all the extensions on copyright expirations, I didn't realize that the Bible was in the public domain.

    --
    Libertarians somehow believe that private businesses should be stronger than governments but weaker than individuals.
    1. Re:Legal? by JamesP · · Score: 1

      What do you mean, the Bible is public domain??

      I wrote it, you should pay $699 for each copy.

      Daryl McBride

      --
      how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
    2. Re:Legal? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 1

      Way too much. Tell me when the price has dropped by $33.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    3. Re:Legal? by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 1

      King James is PD... most of the newer, and more accurate, translations are still copyrighted. That's why you usually only see the KJV available for download.

      It's a great literary work, but 1.) I (and I imagine most people) find 400 year old English very obtuse and hard to read. 2.) Modern translators have gone back to the original Hebrew and Greek, whereas the KJV was translated from the Vulgate.

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    4. Re:Legal? by nacturation · · Score: 1

      That's odd. What with all the extensions on copyright expirations, I didn't realize that the Bible was in the public domain.

      Given that God has been dead for well over 70 years, it's no surprise that the Bible is now in the public domain.

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:Legal? by rf0 · · Score: 1

      I think it would be argued that as the original manuscripts are over 2000 years old copyright has expired so they are free to reproduce

      Rus

    6. Re:Legal? by beta21 · · Score: 1

      Only the old testement

    7. Re:Legal? by thisissilly · · Score: 1

      Lawyers today filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of Jewish people everywhere, vs. Christianity. They claim that the Christians are infringing on their Intellectual Property, known in Christian circles as "The Old Testatment". They also seek to prove that the so-called "New Testament" is a derivative work, based upon characters created in the Old Testament, and thus the exclusive property of the Children of Ahbraham.

    8. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I think it would be argued that as the original manuscripts are over 2000 years old copyright has expired so they are free to reproduce

      Not in most cases. The standard Greek text, the Nestle-Aland 27th is copyrighted. According to Olive Tree:


      Greek text is the Nestle-Aland 27th Edition Greek NT (NA27). The Greek New Testament, edited by Kurt Aland, Matthew Black, Carlo M.Martini, Bruce M. Metzger, and Allen Wikgren, Fourth Revised Edition, (C)1966, 1968, 1975 by United Bible Societies, 1983,1994 by the DeutscheBibelgesellschaft, Stuttgart. Used by permission.


      (Posted as an AC because logging in gives a 500 error)
    9. Re:Legal? by mgg4 · · Score: 1

      As was pointed out, the KJV version is PD. Others may or may not be. In addition, I wanted to correct something mistated by another poster. They stated the other versions could not be downloaded. If you make that, "Downloaded for FREE," I'd go along with that.

      While not free (as in beer), the New International Version (NIV) is available as an e-book for Palm and PocketPC. I have a Palm device, and have the NIV Bible on my PDA (Along with about 80 other titles). Makes a great study reference. Check out Palm Digital Media for more information on the very powerful readers available for Palm, Pocket PC, Windows, and Mac users. Also check out the thousands of titles available; some free, some not.

      --
      -- This space for rent.
    10. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I didn't realize that the Bible was in the public domain.

      s/AOL/God/
      s/CD/Bible/

      It's called marketing. You pay on judgement day...

    11. Re:Legal? by CoolToddHunter · · Score: 0

      I feel the King James Version is not as innacurate as you may believe. It was also not translated from the Vulgate, but from Hebrew and Greek as well. Other translations were also used for comparison. (reference here) However, I will concede that newer translations have used manuscripts that were not discovered at the time the KJV was translated.

    12. Re:Legal? by westlake · · Score: 1
      There are passages in the KJV which no subsequent translation has been able to dislodge from the mind of an English reader.

      The KJV was translated from Greek and Hebrew texts and not the Vulgate. Biblical translations from primary sources are central to the Protestant faiths. In England (not the UK as a whole) the "Authorized Version" remains under a perpetual Crown Copyright King James Version of the Bible.

    13. Re:Legal? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      most of the newer, and more accurate, translations are still copyrighted. That's why you usually only see the KJV available for download.

      Any translation newer than 1922 is copyrighted (in the US). But there's a number of translations available; PG has the Douay-Rheims translation, and the World English Bible (a modern translation) for its English editions. (The World English Bible is still under copyright, but we have the right to use it.) (We could also do the American Standard Edition, but I've never seen a clearable copy.)

      Modern translators have gone back to the original Hebrew and Greek, whereas the KJV was translated from the Vulgate.

      In the original dedication, King James mentions translating it from the original Sacred languages, so I believe you're wrong here. However, their Greek edition was probably closely related to Erasmus's, which started European scholars studying the Greek as opposed to the Vulgate edition, but was not a terribly accurate edition in itself.

    14. Re:Legal? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      The KJV has plenty of problems, but avoiding the Hebrew Scriptures is not one of them; rather, its problem is that it incorrectly assumed that the 17th century Jewish Old Testament was an intact version of the 1st century Old Testament (a faulty assumption common to many Protestants). Such things as screwed up Psalm numbering &c. were thereby introduced.

      No, to translate the Bible one need only have a good working knowledge of Greek: the Septuagint, miraculously translated identically by 72 Jewish scholars for one of the (IIRC) Ptolemies; and the New Testament, preserved intact by the Church since it was first codified. The Masoretic and other versions are horribly full of errors.

    15. Re:Legal? by Experiment+626 · · Score: 1

      In other developments...

      • Spokesangels for the Lord hinted at possible use of DRM in future holy scriptures, citing rampant piracy such as the appearance of the Ten Commandments on file-sharing networks almost immediately after their release on Mount Sinai.
      • Copyright reform advocates responded with complaints that a life plus 70 year copyright held by an immortal being was effectively perpetual.
      • God announced a new non-disclosure agreement for His prophets, claiming their writings often revealed "spoilers" and other proprietary information, including highly anticipated projects such as The End of the World.
      • Lawyers for Satan have filed for a filed for an injunction ceasing distribution of the Bible on the grounds that its negative portrayal of their client constitutes libel. They are also seeking unspecified damages.
      • Research into the Bible Code, hidden messages allegedly contained within God's intellectual property, promped threats of DMCA lawsuits for trying to break the scripture's encryption scheme. In a telephone interview from Heaven, God also suggested that this type of reverse-engineering was a violation of the end user licensing agreement. The situation took an unexpected twist when Darl McBride claimed to be the true owner of said intellectual property, and demanded $699 from God for its continued use...
    16. Re:Legal? by gblues · · Score: 1

      Well, the Bible itself is public domain. It's the various translations that are copyrighted. I believe KJV is and has been public domain for a long time.

      Nathan

    17. Re:Legal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Dude, do you know anything about copyright law?

      Copyright lasts for the life of the author + 90 years. Unless you're saying that God has been dead for 90 years...

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    18. Re:Legal? by cfuse · · Score: 1
      That's odd. What with all the extensions on copyright expirations, I didn't realize that the Bible was in the public domain.

      The bible is propaganda - it only works if it is freely available.

      Besides, the goal is to own your entire life. Spreading the poison just helps the cause.

    19. Re:Legal? by Mad+Marlin · · Score: 1
      Well, the Bible itself is public domain. It's the various translations that are copyrighted. I believe KJV is and has been public domain for a long time.

      The King James Version was ordered into creation by King James I of England, and would have never been copyrighted. James was interested in displacing the Genevan Translation, not making a few shillings selling bibles. If he wanted money, he could just raise a tax, after all.

    20. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you believe that God created you, you owe him your life anyhow. Not any more propagandistic than athiesm or agnosticism.

    21. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not to mention that there was no such thing as copyright at the time.

      In fact, most of the works that can be considered classics are not in the public domain because of copyrights having expired but rather because copyrights are a pretty recent thing.

      If Shakespeare, Ibsen and Milton could do without them, so can we.

    22. Re:Legal? by utopyr · · Score: 1
      The situation took an unexpected twist when Darl McBride claimed to be the true owner of said intellectual property, and demanded $699 from God for its continued use...

      Isn't the license priced $666?
    23. Re:Legal? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      In fact, most of the works that can be considered classics are not in the public domain because of copyrights having expired but rather because copyrights are a pretty recent thing.

      If Shakespeare, Ibsen and Milton could do without them, so can we.


      Even if Shakespeare himself didn't benefit from copyrights (most of his plays weren't published until after his death, anyway), his publishers claimed eternal copyright over Shakespeare's text. Ibsen didn't do without them; by the 19th century, copyrights were a pretty established thing. Note that they were provided for in the US constitution and legislation for them was fairly quickly passed. Twain, for one, argued for the extension of copyright from the then-current (in the US) flat 50 years.

    24. Re:Legal? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I keep getting 500 errors too, when posting logged in and when trying to log in. There's something screwy with Slashdot over the past few days.

    25. Re:Legal? by Burb · · Score: 1

      Eh? Even if we assume that the Masoretic text is "full of errors" ,how can we know? By comparison to older hebrew manuscripts - SOME OF WHICH WE HAVE. So, use the older fragements! Yes, use the Septuagint as one witness to the text, but don't throw out Hebrew texts, that's just plain daft.

      --

    26. Re:Legal? by chthonicdaemon · · Score: 1

      Many, many versions of the Bible can be downloaded for free and read using e-sword (list of Bibles here). That's free but not libre. Open source readers are available from Crosswire

      --
      Languages aren't inherently fast -- implementations are efficient
    27. Re:Legal? by jdavidb · · Score: 1

      I've got the American Standard Version at my site. However, I recently learned that the majority of online Bible sites have a humongous number of errors in their ASV (we are all using the same etext). I recently found the SWORD project, which appears to have a good ASV etext; I intend to extract it and put it on my site, soon.

    28. Re:Legal? by Nathaniel · · Score: 1

      I'd certainly agree that God hasn't been alive any time in the last 90 years. This neatly avoid any questions about any existance or life prior to that time.

    29. Re:Legal? by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Well, since our fictional God didn't write the Bible himself but instead contracted bunch of various crackpots to do it for him, that point is kind of moot, since they've been dead for lot longer than 90 years.

    30. Re:Legal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Good job. You have correctly identified the reason that my joke is funny. You should apply to the Tonight Show to work as the dude who turns on the "Laughter" sign.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    31. Re:Legal? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      You have correctly identified the reason that my joke is funny.

      For him to do that, it'd have to be funny, and with all due respect, it wasn't.

    32. Re:Legal? by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      Good point.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    33. Re:Legal? by welshsocialist · · Score: 1

      The KJV is public domain in the United States. In the UK, it is copyighted. See The KJV Is A Copyrighted Translation for more on this matter.

      --
      Support the Chagossians
    34. Re:Legal? by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      The Septuagint was translated by 72 individual scholars for the library of Alexandria. Each was locked up and made his translation independently of the others, in order that the different versions could be compared and the best selected. But all 72 produced the exact same text--which to me seems the result of divine influence. Thus I'll take the Septuagint as error-free.

      I understand that the recently unearthed pre-Jamnian Hebrew texts agree with the Septuagint rather than the Masoretic and other versions.

    35. Re:Legal? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      The Septuagint was translated by 72 individual scholars for the library of Alexandria. Each was locked up and made his translation independently of the others, in order that the different versions could be compared and the best selected. But all 72 produced the exact same text--which to me seems the result of divine influence. Thus I'll take the Septuagint as error-free.

      Assuming that actually you accept that old legend. There's no more reason to than there is to accept that the Book of Mormon was translated by divine power from the original golden plates.

  11. Re:Anonymous Coward Publishes 10,000th First Post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Down the road" or "across the street"? Which one is quicker? Thanks.

  12. Still by Doomrat · · Score: 1

    I still think his best work was in Short Circuit.

    1. Re:Still by ReidMaynard · · Score: 1

      (heh)

      --
      -- www.globaltics.net

      Political discussion for a new world

    2. Re:Still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROFL

    3. Re:Still by inertia187 · · Score: 1

      You idiot. What are you, some stinking Stone Cutter? Those guys keep making him a star...and where's my electric car??

      --
      A programmer is a machine for converting coffee into code.
    4. Re:Still by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I am thinking she is a virgin, or at least she used to be."

    5. Re:Still by pizza_milkshake · · Score: 1

      Lol, you'd get mod points if i had any left

    6. Re:Still by Nordberg · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's my Gutenberg Bible.

      --
      *Splort*
  13. Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    You can modify them to read as you see fit, as long as you don't distribute them afterwards.

    1. Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      Actually, you can modify them all you want (convert formats and such, doesn't make sense to change the words) and distribute them afterward. These books are all, for the most part, in the public domain, due to copyrights being expired or waived.

      Anyhow, there are other sites that are devoted to takeing PG books and converting into PDF and then letting people download them. I've been there before, but am too lazy to go look it up. It's linked somewhere on the PG site.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    2. Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      doesn't make sense to change the words

      But it would be fun. Just put "not" in strategic places in all of the e-books, then redistribute.

    3. Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Project Gutenberg etexts come with a header and footer. This header and footer are property of Project Gutenberg. Also, Project Gutenberg is a trademarked name.

      If you want to sell Project Gutenberg etexts without paying the Project a licensing fee, you need to strip out the header, footer and references to Project Gutenberg. The public domain part of these etexts is, er, public domain.

      Sites that take PG texts and convert them to easy to read format are Black Mask, Gnutenberg, Pluckerbooks, and Raptorbook. This is off the top of my head, there are probably much more.

      The Gnutenberg search function is broken AFAIK. Just leave the fields empty and click Search. They've got some beautiful PDFs.

      --Branko

    4. Re:Gutenberg books are plain ASCII text. by WillAdams · · Score: 1

      I've done this.

      Take a look at my version of Okakura Kakuzo's _The Book of Tea_ in my portfolio, http://members.aol.com/willadams/portfolio.html

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  14. Project Gutenberg? by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 1

    I thought a place with thousands of free books was called a "library". My bad.

  15. Amazon? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon has these books chea-- oh, wait. No it doesn't. Carry on.

  16. Or start scanning your own approved book. by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

    I have just started one (damm, I didn't make the first 10K). I have 150/191 pages scanned and initial formatting done. Another week, and it just might be submitted.

  17. Slashdotted by ajs · · Score: 1

    The site is slashdotted, could someone post the books here, please? ;-)

    1. Re:Slashdotted by TopShelf · · Score: 1

      They must have had some kinda eBook10K issue that killed the site, like the main database index containing only 4 digits...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Slashdotted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Slashdotted by debrastorr · · Score: 1

      Gutenberg itself is struggling to keep up with the books rushing through from distributed proofreading (DP) so www.gutenberg is currently a few weeks behind in its cataloguing. However www.pgdp.net lists all the "gold" books posts by DP ... and the "silver" and "bronze" coming soon ... Enjoy! Debra

  18. errata by hexatron · · Score: 1

    The last line of chapter 4 of Scaramouche is a fragment from the next chapter. It's been festering there for four years. Spoiler: Scaramouche has the same dumb plot element as Star Wars, and signals it just as far in advance. The lead is more 'with it' than hapless Luke, but the leadette is much less so than Princess CrullerHead. Is the spoiler a) He's your father, b) She's your sister, c)=a+b, or d) She's your father's sister.

    1. Re:errata by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2, Informative

      The scans for all of the books proofed through Distributed Proofreaders are online. Also, if you find errors in a PG book, you're very welcome to submit corrections to it.

    2. Re:errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      no and I too am terrified by the errors in the books... once I saw an i before and e and i was balled up on the floor for days in utter fear.

      damn them and their errors... dont they know how FRIGHTENING they are!!!!

    3. Re:errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you for pointing out this error, we will be sure to sort it out now that you have mentioned it. Feel free to post any further errors you find to me at news@pglaf.org and I will pass them on.

      Many thanks,

      Alice Wood

      Project Gutenberg Newsletter Curator

    4. Re:errata by dq5+studios · · Score: 1

      Scaramouche. Scaramouche.
      Will you do the Fandango?
      Thunderbolt and lightning,
      very, very fright'ning me

  19. Just public domain... by MisanthropicProggram · · Score: 1

    See also:
    www.literature.org/
    www.online-literature.com
    These folks also publish public domain stuff on the web.
    It's sad though, there could be more, but because of the Sony Bono law, stuff that should be in the public domain by nowis still owned by the author's off-spring or estate.

    --

    There is no spoon or sig.

  20. What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by yerricde · · Score: 1

    What happens when Project Gutenberg has finally digitally republished all known literary works in the English language that were first published on or before 1922? Where does PG go once it hits the wall, which thanks to pgdp.net might even come within my lifetime?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by SnarfQuest · · Score: 1

      What makes you think it is english only?

      They'll just jump into the foreign books.

      Also, there are a lot of post 1922 books that were not copyright renewed, but they are a bit harder to clear.

      --
      Who would win this election: Andrew Weiner vs Andrew Weiner's weiner.
    2. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happens when Project Gutenberg has finally digitally republished all known literary works in the English language that were first published on or before 1922?

      Uh... is this some feeble attempt at humor, or do you really not get it? Every day (well, every month, actually) new works are placed in the public domain.

      Given the fact that far more people have been and still are writing books than work for PG, the likelihood that PG is releasing their copies of works faster than new works are being placed into the public domain is very slim.

    3. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you know something I don't but don't copyrights tend to expire at the end of the year? I know for a fact that's true in the United States and Europe.

      The number of works gifted to the public domain is minimal and, thanks to Sonny Bono, no American works will expire into the public domain for 20 years (of which we've used up about 4-5 so far).

      Fortunately, Project Gutenberg has an Australian branch which (unsurprisingly) operates from Australia where copyright is 50 years after the death of the author and has been for a long time. New works expire there quite reliably every New Year's Day.

      Check it out at Project Gutenberg of Australia.

    4. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      What happens when Project Gutenberg has finally digitally republished all known literary works in the English language that were first published on or before 1922?

      For one thing, we don't just do literary works. We haven't even scratched the surface on mathematical and scientific works. As for magazines, we're just starting on Punch and a few other well-known ones. We also haven't started on the books that weren't renewed, and I'd like to think that we'll reverse the last copyright extension in some way or at least hold back the next one.

    5. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by SydShamino · · Score: 1

      I was going to add that some companies, like O'Reilly Publishing, are following the Founder's Copyright and releasing works into the public domain after 14 (or 28) years at most.

      However, in fact, they are not. Instead they are releasing the books with an open license. Thus, while Project Gutenberg could republish these works under the terms of the license, they would remain copyrighted and probably miss the spirit of the project.

      --
      It doesn't hurt to be nice.
    6. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does PG go once it hits the wall, which thanks to pgdp.net might even come within my lifetime?

      What about clean room implementations of important works that aren't in the public domain?

    7. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by jonbryce · · Score: 1

      I'm sure I've seen copyrighted works on PG that are distributed with the permission of the copyright holder.

      However, most, if not all O'Reilly books are in electronic format anyway, so they would just need to copy them.

    8. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by yerricde · · Score: 1

      What about clean room implementations

      That's a lot of work. A re-implementation of Romeo and Juliet might be West Side Story.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    9. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've been in foreign books since not long after the Great PG Slashdotting a year ago come November.

    10. Re:What happens when PG runs into the Bono Wall? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps you know something I don't but don't copyrights tend to expire at the end of the year?

      No, evidently they expire at the end of the month. PG releases new works every month.

      The number of works gifted to the public domain is minimal and, thanks to Sonny Bono, no American works will expire into the public domain for 20 years (of which we've used up about 4-5 so far).

      You are misinformed. Please go read up on the subject.

  21. $1 Trillion? by Jason1729 · · Score: 1

    Have they made any progress on their other goal? They wanted to collect a $1 donation for each book from each of the 100 million people they expected to read it, so when they reached the 10,000 book milestone, they'd have raised $1 trillion.

    Jason
    ProfQuotes

    1. Re:$1 Trillion? by clonebarkins · · Score: 2, Informative
      Have they made any progress on their other goal? They wanted to collect a $1 donation for each book from each of the 100 million people they expected to read it, so when they reached the 10,000 book milestone, they'd have raised $1 trillion.

      Not quite. They estimated that if they charged $1 per book, they would have given away $1 Trillion worth of ebooks, not raised that amount. There's a big difference.

      --

      "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

    2. Re:$1 Trillion? by linzeal · · Score: 1

      Librarians with 1 trillion dollars. I don't know if I want librarians with that sort of money or power. There is something wrong about them, I can't quite figure it out to write it here but something unwholesome.

    3. Re:$1 Trillion? by InfiniteWisdom · · Score: 1

      How many of those 100 million people would download many books if they charged $1 for them?

    4. Re:$1 Trillion? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you read many of the books? Compared to the RIAA crap apple is selling for $1/song on iTunes, these public domain books are an incredible bargian. Apple has sold hundreds of millions of songs at $1 each.

      Unfortunately, I think you're right that not many people would pay the $1/book, but it's more a comment on how pathetic the average americanis than the value of the service gutenberg offers.

    5. Re:$1 Trillion? by monoqlith · · Score: 1

      God, If i had $1 for every time I read an eBook, i would have $0.

  22. errata by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I constantly find errors in Gutenberg's books. It scares me what errors I might be missing. Is there any effort to get scanned versions of these public domain books online, in say a pdf format, so that more people could do proof reading?

  23. It is a library. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

    It is an electronic library. It's name is Project Gutenberg. Libraries do have names, you know. Carnegie comes to mind, you probably have one funded by him in your town.

    It is also a project in that it seeks people to transcribe and proof the texts into acceptable electronic versions.

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    1. Re:It is a library. by IthnkImParanoid · · Score: 1

      And it means I can get books without having to go out in the sun, or talk to girls, or any of the other things that make me tremble like a chihuahua on speed.

      --
      It's nothing but crumpled porno and Ayn Rand.
    2. Re:It is a library. by jared_hanson · · Score: 1

      I'm glad it is around for you then. Everyone should have access to reading material. I prefer a well balanced combination of the two, and book stores as well so I can own books. But, to each his own, and good luck to you.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    3. Re:It is a library. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Repeating this shit doesn't make you any less of a retard than the first person who said it.

  24. Sol 8/9 and Sun ONE Directory 5.2 Headaches by Khakionion · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hello, I'm trying to setup the Sun ONE Directory Server, v5.2, on a Solaris 9 server. The server appears to be running just fine, but when I try to initialize one of our Solaris 8 (or 9) boxen via either ldapconfig or sys-unconfig, I'm given an error that essentially says that I'm using an invalid profile. How is a profile supposed to be setup? I specified the profile name "default" in the idsconfig script, but haven't found any other UI for exporting/importing/creating LDAP profiles. Is there some widget I'm missing? Any help is _greatly_ appreciated. Yours truly, TEH ULTIMATE FROSTY PISS! FP ALL OVER YOUR BITCH-ASS!

    --
    OMG! Wau!
    1. Re:Sol 8/9 and Sun ONE Directory 5.2 Headaches by optime · · Score: 2, Funny

      s/profile/brain/g

  25. For all the noise... by The+Panther! · · Score: 1

    I haven't met anyone who has used the service. For being a fairly large database of reading material, is it only capable of archiving things so old that they have expired copyrights, or specifically released material? If so, you can hardly expect it to become a cultural phenomenon, what with copyrights extending to a million years after all progeny of the author are dead... Which is a shame, because on the merits of recording things for the public domain alone, it's worthwhile, but if people don't use it, what's the true value?

    Anyone here regularly read from Project G? What did you read?

    --
    Any connection between your reality and mine is purely coincidental.
    1. Re:For all the noise... by Mycroft_514 · · Score: 1

      I've read a few things, and collected some more for the slow book publishing season.

      How about: The art of War by Tsun Tzu (spelling?)
      Got a bunch of H. Rider Haggard books.

      And with the new software I just pieced together, I can move books to my PDA (free!) and take them on trips where space is at a premium.

    2. Re:For all the noise... by Alan+Shutko · · Score: 1

      Hi, I'm Alan Shutko and I've used Project Gutenberg.

      Yes, it's limited to things specifically released or out of copyright. But there's an awful lot there. I've used it so I could do full-text searches on various classes for things, I've read a number of books from it (Tom Swift, mostly, because I only have one hardcover going back that far).

    3. Re:For all the noise... by Xtifr · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Anyone here regularly read from Project G?

      I wouldn't say "regularly", but I would say "once in a while". Is that good enough?

      What did you read?

      Shakespeare, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle, Lewis Caroll, early P. G. Wodehouse, early Edgar Rice Burroughs.

    4. Re:For all the noise... by djeaux · · Score: 1
      A lot of the free ebooks at sites like memoware.com were converted from Project Gutenberg files.

      But to address your question even more directly, my 78 yr old father recently "discovered" Project Gutenberg & has enjoyed it a lot. In fact, he announced this to me as if it should be a great revelation & I just had to grin :-D

      --
      "Obviously, I'm not an IBM computer any more than I'm an ashtray" (Bob Dylan)
    5. Re:For all the noise... by The+One+KEA · · Score: 1

      I've read some of Edgar Rice Burrough's Barsoom series from Project Gutenberg.

      --
      SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    6. Re:For all the noise... by The+Infamous+TommyD · · Score: 1

      I used to read Jules Verne stuff that I had read as a kid on my palm pilot. Of course, this is old enough to be on PG. Very cool. One of the readers can auto scroll. Adjust the timing and just look at the same line.

    7. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      My personal favorite is "Farmers of Forty Centuries" but I'm odd.

    8. Re:For all the noise... by dvdeug · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For being a fairly large database of reading material, is it only capable of archiving things so old that they have expired copyrights [...] you can hardly expect it to become a cultural phenomenon,

      At least some of us read some of that older material. Shakespeare and Poe and Twain didn't suddenly become pointless after you left school.

      Personally I've found myself reading a number of pulp mysterys - The Orange-Yellow Diamond by J.S. Fletcher (some sterotypes, but not racist), Joe Muller: Detective by Grace Isabel Colbron and Augusta Groner, and of course the early Agatha Christies. Despite being "a million years" old, they're still quite good novels.

    9. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The other day, Apocalypse Now was on the tube, so I downloaded the original and read it as a bed time story on my Palm Zire.

      Then again, I am a DP volunteer, so may be biased. :-)

      Being Dutch, I won't break the law by downloading books from PG Australia, so that's another interesting option for me.

      --branko

    10. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It is better for fiction than non-fiction, as the other replies here make clear. But there's a lot of non-fiction that is worth reading--Darwin's original works (surprisingly easy reads) and if you like insects, Fabre and Maeterlink.

    11. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Anyone here regularly read from Project G? What did you read?"

      Jules Verne, Mark Twain, HG Wells, Herotodus, Lincoln, Gibbon, Napolean, Stoker, Wilde, Poe, Lovecraft, London, Dickens, Plutach, ...

    12. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i read a couple of these books every month, most recently "Diary of a U-Boat Captain" "Lost World" and "20,000 Leagues Under the Sea". "Nostromo" by Joseph Conrad is up next.

    13. Re:For all the noise... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone here regularly read from Project G? What did you read?

      I usually keep a PG book (currently a G.K.Chesterton Father Brown mystery) in a small text box to read during downloads and, you know, slow times. Less blatant than Freecell.

    14. Re:For all the noise... by MQBS · · Score: 1

      Every single school assignment for the first semester of English, be it American or European history, if its in english and theres a book on it, its probably in the public domain. Lots easier to cut and paste that way for block quotes.

      --
      The dream reveals the reality which conception lags behind. That is the horror of life- the terror of art. -Franz Kafka
    15. Re:For all the noise... by varag · · Score: 1

      I'm currently reading "Great Expectations."

  26. Ummm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Has anyone yet mentioned that you can help out by joining the distributed proofreaders project out help out? What's the link?

    1. Re:Ummm... by sik0fewl · · Score: 1

      Has anyone yet mentioned that you can help out by joining the distributed proofreaders project out help out? What's the link?

      Yes, they have.

      --
      I remember when legal used to mean lawful, now it means some kind of loophole. - Leo Kessler
  27. Project Gluttenburger by tds67 · · Score: 0
    In related news, Project Gluttenburger recently celebrated its 48th anniversary.

    Project Gluttenburger was founded in 1955 by an underweight clown, with the aim of "[making] fatty, high cholesterol foods and other greasy materials available to the general public in quantities that will make a vast majority of the people obese, rotund and super-sized."

  28. OH DEAR GOD, NO!!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 1

    For teh love of Mike, PLEASE don't be sending slashbots over there to be voluntear proofreeders!!!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  29. eLibrary by westlake · · Score: 1

    eLibrary is Windows Freeware, a Project Gutenberg "client" with built-in FTP, search engine, reader and HTML export.

  30. What about the artists? by daeviltwin · · Score: 0

    Just think how much money could have been made if it weren't for Project gutenburg? Do any of the artists (or their heirs) get any money from this? NO! This is a travesty. People are on the street, sucking in welfare all because of these commie bastards!

  31. Short Circuit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He was good in Cocoon too.

  32. Another Online Library by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another free/open online library is the Marxists Internet Archive, which publishes material across the spectrum of the left. It contains around 30,000 files (books, documents, letters, etc), and is published in 30 different languages, the latter of which beats Project Gutenberg by quite alot. They have everything from Adam Smith to Lao Tzu to Karl Marx. A very impressvie collection!

  33. SOMEBODY MOD THESE UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Darl charging $666 for a copy of the Bible is too sweet :-)

  34. YOU CAN HELP!!! by clonebarkins · · Score: 1

    Go to Distributed Proofreaders to help out! The are a distributed effort to scan, OCR, proof, and post books to Project Gutenberg.

    --

    "The evil of the world is made possible by nothing but the sanction you give it." -- Ayn Rand

  35. The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Notably absent from this site is "The Black Book of Communism; Crimes, Terror, Repression" by Courtois, Werth, et. al. Probably because the marxists are so eager to overlook the 100 million people killed by attempts to establish a communist utopia.

    1. Re:The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Absent because the book is copyright! Unless you enjoy book burning, this is a good site with contributions from capitalists like Keynes and Smith; they seem to have no problem accepting whatever people send in.

      Fwiw, keep in mind that BILLIONS of people continue to die and starve to death because capitalism won't feed them. Stalinism killed tens of millions, and thankfully it did not last to kill more, but let's not play make believe -- capitalism has a great deal more blood on its hands.

    2. Re:The Black Book of Communism by greenhide · · Score: 1

      Right, because as I read it it's an archive for marxist and leftist articles.

      Kinda how you wouldn't expect to find a copy of The Communist Manifesto on Rush Limbaugh's website -- or Lies and the Lying Liars Who Tell Them, for that matter. Both are books that don't fall into Rush Limbaughs sphere of interest.

      Centralized communism didn't turn out the way that Marx envisioned; that doesn't make some of the social criticism or observations from the left any less valid. Most of the advances in labor laws that exist today -- the 40 hour work week, anti-child labor laws, safety laws -- were brought about by protests and agitations from unions, back when unions were strongly leftist and many of the leaders were reading works by Marx and Engels.

      Personally, I think it's a shame that we don't teach the history of the labor movement in the United States, or about the huge debt in improved living conditions that we owe to it. Most of the people who were alive during the first labor uprisings are long dead. With the loss of manufactoring jobs, and the corporatization of union leaders, the legacy of the labor movement is dying out, and it seems likely that in just a few decades only a few history scholars will know or remember anything about it.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    3. Re:The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      this is a good site with contributions from capitalists like Keynes and Smith;

      Erm, yeah, Keynes is to capitalist, as Stalin is to living nice guy.

    4. Re:The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      "Centralized communism didn't turn out the way that Marx envisioned; that doesn't make some of the social criticism or observations from the left any less valid."
      The utter failure of communism in all its forms certainly does imply that leftist "observations" leave a lot to be desired.

      "Most of the advances in labor laws that exist today -- the 40 hour work week, anti-child labor laws, safety laws -- were brought about by protests and agitations from unions, back when unions were strongly leftist and many of the leaders were reading works by Marx and Engels. Personally, I think it's a shame that we don't teach the history of the labor movement in the United States, or about the huge debt in improved living conditions that we owe to it."
      If you read history carefully, you'll see that the standard of living of the common man rose right along with free market industrialization, the labor movements did not accelerate it. And the more communist a country is, the lower the standard of living is for the labor union members. My entire working life, I've not been in a union, and I've worked for major corporations (never as a manager), yet I've been paid more than union members. Marxist theory claims that cannot be. Marxist theory is simply wrong.

    5. Re:The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buddy, did you ever work in a factory? Or in any other manufacturing job? How about dining services? These are areas where people need unions because people who work there need a job, any job, and will work for pretty much any money. A single person has no power against a company and really cannot argue for a fair wage or a fair benefits package if he can be replaced on a whim (because more often than not, one person is very replaceable.) Unions have some bargaining power against a big company and can prevent abuses of workers in the workplace.

    6. Re:The Black Book of Communism by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If, as you say, a single person has "no power", then why is it that 98% of the workforce gets more than minimum wage, yet only a small percentage of the workforce is unionized? Why don't you try hiring, say, a nanny? Just try and see how many of those people will work for minimum wage.

    7. Re:The Black Book of Communism by stanmann · · Score: 1

      If you are that easy to replace, then perhaps you are only worth what it costs to replace you... If you want to make $35 an hour, perhaps you should try skilled labor instead of bolting on tires or flipping burgers...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
  36. Rainforest rules by soxthemonkee · · Score: 0

    Oh! My family is from the rainforest... If you cut it down they'll have to come live with me! Yikes!

  37. If a man dies owing money to Jews by meehawl · · Score: 1
    If anyone who has borrowed a sum of money from Jews dies before
    the debt has been repaid, his heir shall pay no interest on the debt
    for so long as he remains under age, irrespective of whom he holds his
    lands. If such a debt falls into the hands of the Crown, it will take
    nothing except the principal sum specified in the bond.
    What a different, horrible world! This passage reminded me that in this time the largest corporation in Europe, the Roman Church, was desperately afraid of economic activity that they feared (rightly!) could undermine their power. They knew that if merchants got more powerful and cities became wealthy, then their international monopoly on buildings and land would be challenged. Basically, no Christians were to be allowed to practice usury, or the accumulation of capital through lending. So they made it permissible for European Jews to practice usury (hence the 'money lender' stereotypes) because, well,when it came down to it, back then they figured Jewish people were barely human and could probably be killed and burned and their assets seized at will.
    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:If a man dies owing money to Jews by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 1
      It's not that bad. IIRC, at the time Christians weren't allowed to lend money for interest, and so `borrow...from Jews' was the same as `borrow...from a bank' would be today. The provision simply means that (say I'm an adolescent) if my father dies with a loan outstanding, I needn't pay interest until I've achieved my majoroty. It protects a minor from poor guardians.

      And the reason Christians weren't allowed to lend for interest had nothing to do with fear of economic activity, and plenty to do with legislating morality. It was considered wrong to practice usury, and it was thus made illegal. Yet another example that legislating morals is dumb.

    2. Re:If a man dies owing money to Jews by OddHackGEA · · Score: 1
      I don't think this is really an anti-Jewish statement, since it's immediately followed by

      Debts owed to persons other than Jews are to be dealt with similarly.

      It's just that if you borrowed money back then, you probably had borrowed it from a Jew. Replace "Jew" with "bank" and you probably get a better sense of how it fit into the economy of the time.

      The part about an underage heir not being charged interest on an inherited debt sounds pretty reasonable.

      The second part, well, that's just the Crown trying to get an edge in general, not just putting it to the Jews (not that that didn't happen at various times and places, with or without a "law" to back it up).

    3. Re:If a man dies owing money to Jews by Destoo · · Score: 1

      Indeed. The worse was during the inquisition.

      1) borrow money from a jewish person.
      2) spend the money/buy farm/whatever
      3) go see an inquisitor and accuse the jew of heresy. "He's eating meat on friday! He must be evil!"
      ( 4) Profit!!!! )

      And I've heard that it did happen a few times.

      But don't worry, I'm sure similar stories happened for other religions too.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
  38. Story submission backlog by Chris+Brewer · · Score: 1

    The backlog must be clearing out now...

    1215-10-15 dawneth Magna Carta Published (yro, news) (accepted)

    CmdrTaco must be pleased to get this one out of the queue.

    --
    Consultancy: If you're not part of the solution, there's money to be made in prolonging the problem
  39. book binding course needed ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So print/bind your own using the etext and then donate the money it would have cost in the local book store !

  40. open translation of the Bible (was Re:Legal?) by WillAdams · · Score: 1

    Take a look here:

    http://ebible.org/

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  41. Just Imagine! by El · · Score: 4, Funny

    You mean, the U.S. Constitution has been freely available on the Internet all this time, and still Ashcroft hasn't bothered to read it?

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    1. Re:Just Imagine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No surprise. Neither have any of the lefty pol-trolls here, like yourself .

    2. Re:Just Imagine! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No surprise. Neither have any of the lefty pol-trolls here, like yourself .

      Ok Anon Cow, that's the last straw. You're on my foes list.

  42. mod up parent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    correction to incorrect first post

  43. Investing strategy: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...get a spell checker.

    This file contains a number of versions of the Magna Carta, some of which were a little mangled in transit. I am sure our volunteers will find and correct errors I didn't catch, and that version 0.2 - 1.0 will have significant improvments, as well as at least one more version in Latin.

    To catch stuff like spelling "improvements" correctly.

  44. Is there *any* editorial oversight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean, "Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk" - an thoroughly discredited[1,2,3] bit of anti-Catholic propoganda - is included on the "gold" list.

    Why not just include ""The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"[4] as well?

    Have _some_ sense, people!

    [1] www.english.upenn.edu/~traister/hughes.html
    [2] www.museumofhoaxes.com/mariamonk.html
    [3] www.angelfire.com/ms/seanie/mariamonk.html
    [4] www.us-israel.org/jsource/anti-semitism/hoax.html

    1. Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? by suitti · · Score: 1

      There is. Someone has to want to scan the document, run OCR, and edit it. It's pretty time consuming. I know I wouldn't do that for the Learned Elders. But, perhaps there is someone who would.

      --
      -- Stephen.
    2. Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      I mean, "Awful Disclosures of Maria Monk" - an thoroughly discredited[1,2,3] bit of anti-Catholic propoganda - is included on the "gold" list.

      We're a library; our job is not to pretty up the past, it's to record. We noted on our copy that it was propoganda, and left it at that. If you are interested in the history of anti-Catholism in the US, that is an important work to read.

      Why not just include ""The Protocols of the Learned Elders of Zion"[4] as well?

      Because we haven't found a clearable copy yet? That work had indirectly affected everyone on the planet; it's an important historical document, and so it should be preserved, if only so people can know what racist lieing screeds sound like so they can recognize it when the next politician or disgruntled psycho starts reciting them.

    3. Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "gold" list just means that the text has been passed through all the stages of the Distributed Proofreaders program. Don't read any more signifigance into the designation than that.

    4. Re:Is there *any* editorial oversight? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      http://world.std.com/obi/Rants/Protocols/

      on the web since 1995

      "About "The Protocols of The Learned Elders of Zion":

      "In a sentence it is a fraud, a forgery. Based upon an earlier anti-semitic tract even it appeared over 10 years previous to the "meeting" it claims to document. It was apparently written by some members of the secret police force working for the czar, in the late 19th century. See the text below for details."

  45. Re:Forget Palmdoc try Ztxt format in Weasel Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Weasel Reader formerly known as Gutenpalm uses its own format based off zlib called ztxt. This compresses the files more than palmdoc does so you can fit more text on the palm pilot on less space.

    From their about page:

    ... [Ztxt] "results in much smaller files than with the PalmDoc method. For example, the Project Gutenberg e-text of "The Merry Adventures of Robin Hood" is approximately 600K in size. Compressed as a zTXT, it is only 261K in size, while with PalmDoc it is about 330K. Since the Palm Pilots do not have very much memory, this is a big savings." ...

  46. Ah, back to the original meaning of... by the-matt-mobile · · Score: 1

    10,000 eBooks! That, my friends, returns us to the original meaning of a Beowulf cluster*!


    * - Yes, yes - I know. Terrible joke. We all wish we could filter out all comments that had "Beowulf", "In other news", and "In Soviet Russia" in the text, but alas...

    1. Re:Ah, back to the original meaning of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Speaking of Beowulf...

  47. "Literary" by yerricde · · Score: 1

    For one thing, we don't just do literary works.

    United States copyright law lists the categories of copyrighted works in 17 USC 102. OK, I forgot dramatic works; I'll give you that. But has PG begun to preserve "musical works []; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; motion pictures and other audiovisual works; sound recordings; and architectural works"? I thought PG etexts were plain ASCII text.

    We haven't even scratched the surface on mathematical and scientific works.

    Those are "literary works" under 17 USC 101.

    We also haven't started on the books that weren't renewed

    This is a finite set as well.

    I'd like to think that we'll reverse the last copyright extension in some way or at least hold back the next one.

    Wishful thinking has its purposes, but does PG have a plan B?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:"Literary" by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      But has PG begun to preserve "musical works []; pictorial, graphic, and sculptural works; motion pictures and other audiovisual works; sound recordings; and architectural works"?

      Yes, to some of those. We have some transcribed musical texts, (and one top forty song), and some of us have started working on early movies; so far PG only has a few short, low-res Government clips.

      I thought PG etexts were plain ASCII text.

      Common misconception. PG usually keeps an ASCII edition where feasable, but that doesn't exclude them making other editions or ignoring that when it isn't reasonable. (In any case, we could just do like the movie companies used to when they would print out every frame for copyright, and run every frame of a movie through a graphic to ascii filter.)

      Those are "literary works" under 17 USC 101.

      I don't think you have a concept of just how many literary works were printed before 1922. Take a look at the Canadiana or Making of America sites one day to see a great wealth of eligible books that aren't in PG yet. My old library at OSU probably had 10,000 eliglible books we hadn't done yet.

      This is a finite set as well.

      The number of atoms in the universe is also a finite set.

      I'd like to think that we'll reverse the last copyright extension in some way or at least hold back the next one.

      Wishful thinking has its purposes, but does PG have a plan B?

      You like worrying, don't you? What will happen, will happen, and maybe once we get a lot closer, we'll have to worry about it, but so long as we have a large supply of texts, there's no need to worry about it. What's the worst that happens, Project Gutenberg stops getting larger nearly as fast?

    2. Re:"Literary" by Eccles · · Score: 1

      Wishful thinking has its purposes, but does PG have a plan B?

      Plan B: Buy all copyrights ever.

      Plan C: An army of giant robots that would threaten to take over the world unless copyright duration is shortened. Oh, and Subway has to bring back the "V" cut too.

      Progress on these has admittedly been limited.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  48. uBook by _LORAX_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's the only eBook reader I use. Slightly confusing itterface to get used to, but very clean and simple. Reads many unencrypted text formats including ( pdb, prc, txt, rtf, html ) and can read into .zip archives and display covers/inline images.

    Runs on windows and the pocketPC platform and is FREEWARE.

    uBook download

    1. Re:uBook by thefluxster · · Score: 1

      I also love this program. You'd be surprised with the difference it makes in reading through a text file.

      --

      Ever notice how fast Windows runs? Neither did I.

    2. Re:uBook by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI, pdb is the generic palm database file. It can contain any type of data you want to send to a palm.

  49. Making Omelettes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "Fwiw, keep in mind that BILLIONS of people continue to die and starve to death because capitalism won't feed them. Stalinism killed tens of millions, and thankfully it did not last to kill more, but let's not play make believe -- capitalism has a great deal more blood on its hands."

    Is that so? How about documenting it? Which famine was caused by free markets? Which billions are dying at the hands of capitalism? Which capitalist thinker has defended mass murder with "to make an omelette, you have to break a few eggs"? Which thinker justified mass murder with "you shall not enter the palace of socialism wearing velvet slippers"?

  50. congrats by TLouden · · Score: 1

    thats a good acomplishment from a good group

    --
    -Tim Louden
  51. Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I found the following post from the Creative Commons discussion list interesting:
    While the "Public Domain Dedication" at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/publicdomain/ seems reasonable, I created my own version which you can see at the bottom of my page http://us.metamath.org/symbols/symbols.html . Although I think it is OK as it is, I welcome comments.

    I provide the md5 sum of my public domain file archive. While this may seem nitpicky, it allows the work to be identified unambigously, eliminating the possibility of accidentally using a modified version of that file that someone else has copyrighted. This is one of the dangers of public domain - for example, a photograph of a public-domain painting can be copyrighted, even though it may be visually indistinguishable from another one that has been released to public domain.

    Also, I explicitly mention some of the things that can be done with a public domain work to educate the reader. I see many misguided pronouncements making things "public domain" with restrictions attached - for example, "public domain as long as you keep any derivative work public domain", "public domain but you must acknowledge me as the author", or "public domain for educational use". These are really copyright licenses, which is fine if that's what the authors want, but they misunderstand the term "public domain".

    What is my personal motivation for making something public domain? For me there is a certain kind of satisfaction I get from old books and images with expired copyright, in that I am completely unencumbered to do whatever I wish with them, without any concern about possible consequences of copying, quoting, sharing, building on, or otherwise using the words, images, and ideas contained therein. I don't have to obsess with keeping track of and chasing down credits and permissions for every little piece of every little image that I might use.

    Because I like the feeling of this kind of complete freedom, it is my desire that others experience it with respect to certain work of my own. If by my example some other people are encouraged to do the same, that would benefit me.

    Public domain can also make things more practical. Since it can be so time-consuming to track down the copyrights for all the images you want to use on a web page, that often it is more efficient just to reinvent the wheel, taking your own photos of the same thing and redrawing your own versions of the same figures. Royalty-free collections can satisfy the need to a certain extent, but you still have to be careful to understand the licensing terms when using them - for example, do they allow your final work, and therefore any of their images contained in it, to be released to public domain if some day you should decide to do so?

    In the end, under public domain I accept that someone may "steal" my work and call it their own. But honorable people give credit where credit makes sense, and for me life is too short to give a hoot about the others. So far it has not been a problem; instead, people have thanked me for making it public domain, and that makes me feel good.

    1. Re:Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      a photograph of a public-domain painting can be copyrighted, even though it may be visually indistinguishable from another one that has been released to public domain.

      Nope. Some company sued Corel over including pictures it had made of famous paintings in their image collections. The court ruled that making a copy of an existing work doesn't give a new copyright, no matter how hard it is. In the US, at least, creative effort is required for a new copyright.

    2. Re:Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So how can Bill Gate's Corbis (sp?), as I understand it, own the "digital rights" to all kinds of paintings of the masters? Or am I mistaken?

    3. Re:Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I'm very glad they won, and I hope it set some kind of of precedent. But you're talking about Corel with deep pockets. An ordinary person would have no means to be able to defend against this type of lawsuit brought against them by a big corp. The very fact the court took it seriously enough not to toss it out as a frivolous lawsuit is not a good sign.

    4. Re:Encouraging and clarifying "pubic domain" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      First of all, if a painting is still under copyright, then the owner of the copyright in that painting can license Mr. Gates to distribute digital copies of a copyrighted work.

      If a painting is no longer under copyright, then any photograph which attempts to make a good, honest copy of that painting will not be allowed a copyright. In order to have a copyright, you must have done something beyond "sweat of the brow." There is some case law that photographs and other straight reproductions don't qualify for a copyright.

  52. OHE DEAR GOD !!!YES!!! by adjtime · · Score: 1

    get back on track :

    If it is possible to use a large voleme of corrected and classified documenst as a soure
    fof information it greately extend the possible ueses of the data - spell checkers / syntax - bla bla.
    Given acurate context and bibl. information the
    possibilities for historical research expand greatly. The information can be processed and used given information about the era / lingo /a curacy / conditions under which it was created which ALL
    contribute to the value of the information provided. Ever tried to read danty with out looking at the footnotes - = junk with the footnote it's f**king amazing

  53. Thanks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As a former English major who used Project Gutenberg in college, I just have to say, "Great work!"

    The ability to download literary classics and quickly do a text search really cut down on research time.

  54. Morality Reflects Power by meehawl · · Score: 1
    the reason Christians weren't allowed to lend for interest had nothing to do with fear of economic activity, and plenty to do with legislating morality. It was considered wrong to practice usury, and it was thus made illegal. Yet another example that legislating morals is dumb.
    Morality derives from the State, and yet also from the people, as a way of reproducing and constraining power relations. That's why "acceptable" morals were transformed during the century-long conversion of the Roman Empire from Pagan to Christian. It's a complex feedback mechanism.

    Don't kid yourself about the position of Jews in European society of that time -- they were seen as a necessary, expendable evil. Xenophobia in general was rampant when Venice, following on from its seclusion of Germans under house arrest in apartment blocks, figured out it could move all its Jews into a single area, the Ghetto, where they could be controlled and, if necessary, eliminated more easily.

    And as for the "why" of usury prohibiton, I am definitely viewing it from a structuralist viewpoint. What end did it serve? Why did it persist? Who gained advantage from it, and how was this advantage leveraged?

    People have on occasion engaged in wholescale social engineering efforts through legislating morality. The Roman Church's redefiniton of 13 degrees of consanguinity as "incest" in the 1200s comes to mind, as do more recent and unsuccessful attempts at social engineering in the US, such as the failed Alchohol Prohibition and the failing Drugs Prohibition. Anyway, the link between post-medieval non-conformity, Protestantism, and Capitalsm is well-established and pervasive. I note that the massively expanded incest prohibition was originally designed to limit the growing power of self-sufficient kinship collectives within medium-sized towns. But by scattering marriageable brides far and wide, it had the unintended consequence of creating a more dynamic capital market and, by lessening the self-sufficiency, it made it possible for the merchant classes to profitably exchange more goods and services over greater distances. It was a key enabler for the rebirth of urbanism.
    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Morality Reflects Power by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "as for the "why" of usury prohibiton"

      Rules against profiting from lending go back to prehistory and are recorded as part of the laws of the Jews in the Old Testament. Jews, Christians, and Muslims who are literalists in their interpretation of their Holy Scriptures can not, without sin, charge interest in the way banks do (some believe this only applies to lending to someone of the SAME faith).

  55. Everything by Jack London... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The way it reads, it's sometimes hard to believe it was written in the early 1900's.

  56. Slightly Off-Topic; archive of incorrect charter by zealotasd · · Score: 1

    I have ascertained that Project Gutenberg has made some verry grave mistakes in their alleged duplicate of the "Constitution of the United States of America." Project Gutenberg's duplicate of the "Unanimous Declaration of Indepenance of July 4, 1776" appears to be correct. Yet, let me get to the truth in their alleged duplicate unamended "Constitution of the United States of America." I searched the Project Gutenberg archive for the the titular commercial charter for these united States of America and discovered a modern, (un?)intentionaly misleading, and incorrect entry. There are some discrepancies that are noticable. Project Gutenberg claims they are providing the "Constitution of the United States of America" as NOT AMMENDED and NOT REVISED, yet this is disputed because not until the alleged "14th Ammendment" was there ever spoken in the alleged "Constitution..." a "United States" in any RECEIVERSHIP for PUBLIC DEBTS. As provided duplicate from Project Gutenberg's archive,

    BlockQuote EvidenceOf14thAmendment { "To exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District (not exceeding ten Miles square) as may, by Cession of particular States, and the Acceptance of Congress, become the Seat of the Government of the United States, and to exercise like Authority over all Places purchased by the Consent of the Legislature of the State in which the Same shall be, for the Erection of Forts, Magazines, Arsenals, Dockyards, and other needful Buildings;--And" }

    The previous quoted text is substance of the alleged "14th Amendment"! It is of nature defining a "United States" limited to jurisdiction of 10 square miles! This was known as the "Act of 1871", to create a "Government for the District of Columbia" of which to emancipate (aka Transfer of Title of Ownership) the "slaves" into ownership by an alleged "United States" as secured property and further provides for the naturalization and granted federal citizenship as well as granted privileges of the alleged "United States" to own property outside its lawful jurisdiction of 10 square miles and expand its "possesions". According to law, if an attempt is to be made to FREE a slave (aka Bondservant) then a process to manumit must ensue. According to Webster's Dictionary and Black's Book of Law, as well as some sources on Dictionary.com, manumit is the "dissolve of Title of Ownership" and emancipation is the "transfer of Title of Ownership". Yet, who is to argue a slave's freedom from an oppressive Master and unto a new Master that is more lenient or kind (aka United States)? In support of my testimony, I will provide evidence in the United States Code, that the United States spoken of in the 14th Amendment is a corporation! According to USC Title 27, Section 3002,

    (15)
    ''United States'' means -
    (A)
    a Federal corporation;

    Continuing my testimony and perusing to Article Six, there is more evidence that Project Gutenberg's claim of providing "Constitution..." as unamended,

    BlockQuoth MoreEvidenceOfAmendment { "All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.

    This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
    " }

    If anyone wants to read all the true and correct history of the colonies as they re-organized into united States, the beginning of the federal ussurpation, the Continental Congress, and the creation of the alleged "United States" federal corporation withou

    --

    Secured Party, Without Prejudice, UCC 1-207: Creditor
  57. Last time I checked... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
    ...they were still throwing away the formatting of the text to force it into crude 80 column ASCII. Are they still doing that? At the time they started the project I don't think there wasn't much excuse for not using some kind of markup and nowadays there's absolutely no excuse.

    Of course I'll now get the expected slew of people telling me that the formatting can all be reconstructed. It cannot. There is no unambiguous way to recover reasonable formatting of these texts to be viewed in any other format other than 80 columns. For a while I tried reading Gutenberg books on my Palm but the spurious line breaks everywhere drove me crazy, even after doing quite a bit of scripting to make a best guess at the correct format.

    When authors write it's not just the letters that counts. Some of that writing effort goes into formatting and you can't just discard it. It's depressing thinking how much work has gone into removing crucial information from 10,000 of the world's texts.

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    1. Re:Last time I checked... by BenjyD · · Score: 1

      You should use Plucker books on your Palm. Only 2000 books so far, but no random line breaks (apart from those enforced by 160 pixel screen). And a new version (1.6) of Plucker is just out.

    2. Re:Last time I checked... by OAB · · Score: 1

      At the time they started the project I don't think there wasn't much excuse for not using some kind of markup and nowadays there's absolutely no excuse.

      How many negatives? What are you trying to say?

      If (as I suspect) you think there was no excuse for going with plain 80 column ASCII in 1971, I suggest you read up on your history.

    3. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CHECK AGAIN ! They now AGREE with you.

      They are updating *.txt files as *.html files and offering both in *.zip form for the purpose of downloading.

      Naturally, this doesn't all occur overnight.

      Check out "McElroy" for a book with lots of pictures.

    4. Re:Last time I checked... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1

      Woohoo!!!

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    5. Re:Last time I checked... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      ...they were still throwing away the formatting of the text to force it into crude 80 column ASCII. Are they still doing that? At the time they started the project I don't think there wasn't much excuse for not using some kind of markup and nowadays there's absolutely no excuse.

      To start with: what type of markup do you think we should have used? The 1971 start of PG predates TeX, XML or Troff. Even 1990, in some ways a more accurate start date, predates HTML and XML. Do you honestly think that forcing all our volunteers to learn some odd markup that few could turn into something readable would have been an advantage?

      Even now, most of our books come out in the same 80 column plain text (we post many books in ISO-8859-1, though.) This is because, despite your claims to the contrary, it's entirely suitable for many books.

      When authors write it's not just the letters that counts. Some of that writing effort goes into formatting and you can't just discard it.

      We don't discard italics. Looking at the pile of books around me, "Presten som ikke kunde brukes" uses bold instead of italics; any text transform that noted bold (say using underscores) would preserve everything. "The Food of the Gods" has a couple line diagrams that could be reproduced in ASCII art (and technically aren't formatting.) "The Rivals of Sherlock Holmes" has a map of London (that didn't come with the stories originally.) "Earthclan" has one picture of an alien ship. "El la Biblio" has nothing that would be lost by transformation into plain text. True, this is a biased selection, but if you look at what's been uploaded to Project Gutenberg, most of it that's just in plain text is exactly these types of work that don't degrade in putting them into plain text. Math books are in TeX and heavily graphical books are in HTML, if either of them are in PG at all.

    6. Re:Last time I checked... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 1
      Hmmm....I was going a bit funny with the negatives.
      I suggest you read up on your history
      Come on. You know you just tossed that out without actually reading any history yourself gambling it was on your side. Well it's not.

      Many markup languages existed in 1971: troff predecessors runoff, roff, rf; SGML predecessor GML (I remember actually learning that one at IBM years ago). Book publishers had been talking about structure information in manuscripts for years before Project Gutenberg started. And just about any computer capable of dealing with entire novels in files (at least around 100K) would have been capable of running a simple viewer for such languages. The original argument was that they wanted the files to be viewable on any machine. Even if that did require plain ASCII there was no reason why the Gutenberg guys couldn't have generated that ASCII from markup that they archived.

      Anyway, it seems they're working on fixing the problem now so good luck to them!

      --
      Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
    7. Re:Last time I checked... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Many markup languages existed in 1971: troff predecessors runoff, roff, rf; SGML predecessor GML

      Oh cool, let's take our limited volunteer labor and force them to learn some off the wall markup language that they will never use anywhere else.

      just about any computer [...] would have been capable of running a simple viewer for such languages

      Oh cool, let's take our audience and get rid of anyone not willing to run a viewer they only need for our books. Provided, of course, there is a viewer for their system, be it any one of the dozens before Windows, Mac and Unix forced just everyone else out of the playing field.

      Or, of course, we could provide plain text files. So we do all this extra work to create marked up files, and take the extra load on our server or distribution media, so people can view the plain text file.

      The biggest cost in markup is the height of hoops you're asking volunteers to jump through.

    8. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh cool, let's take our limited volunteer labor and force them to learn...

      Are you crazy? Do you know how long it takes to type and proofread a book and how little time it takes to learn ".it" (or whatever) means italics?

      Oh cool, let's take our audience and get rid of anyone not willing to run a viewer they only need for our books.

      I just explained how to deal with that by archiving the markup.

      So we do all this extra work to create marked up files

      I love the dumb things people say when they lose an argument and didn't check their facts.
    9. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the sed FAQ - http://www.student.northpark.edu/pemente/sed/sedfa q4.html#s4.27

      4.27. How do I change all paragraphs to long lines?
      A frequent request is how to convert DOS-style textfiles, in which each line ends with "paragraph marker", to Microsoft-style textfiles, in which the "paragraph" marker only appears at the end of real paragraphs. Sometimes this question is framed as, "How do I remove the hard returns at the end of each line in a paragraph?"

      The problem occurs because newer word processors don't work the same way older text editors did. Older text editors used a newline (CR/LF in DOS; LF alone in Unix) to end each line on screen or on disk, and used two newlines to separate paragraphs. Certain word processors wanted to make paragraph reformatting and reflowing work easily, so they use one newline to end a paragraph and never allow newlines within a paragraph. This means that textfiles created with standard editors (Emacs, vi, Vedit, Boxer, etc.) appear to have "hard returns" at inappropriate places. The following sed script finds blocks of consecutive nonblank lines (i.e., paragraphs of text), and converts each block into one long line with one "hard return" at the end.

      (SCRIPT T0 FIX YOUR ISSUE WOULDN'T MAKE IT PAST SLASHDOT'S JUNK FILTER, BUT IT'S ON THE PAGE.)

      If the input files have formatting or indentation that conveys special meaning (like program source code), this script will remove it. But if the text still needs to be extended, try 'par' (paragraph reformatter) or the 'fmt' utility with the -t or -c switches and the width option (-w) set to a number like 9999.

    10. Re:Last time I checked... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm sure some of these reformatting tricks work fine, there is always DeepReader (shareware), which does a decent job of getting most book-like formatting back on a Palm (and can automatically mend the 80-char issue). It also sports anti-aliased fonts...

      Or have you already tried it?

    11. Re:Last time I checked... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Do you know how long it takes to type and proofread a book

      Yes, but most of PG's books were made with OCR even then.

      how little time it takes to learn ".it" (or whatever) means italics?

      Why not use "_"? Plain text gives us decent markup for italics, and paragraphs, and chapter headings. You've got to do better then that to make a switch worth it, and then it starts getting complex.

      I just explained how to deal with that by archiving the markup.

      Right, let's do all this work and then basically throw it away because we might need it in 20 years. I don't know about your work philosophy, but I don't like doing things like that.

  58. Hard to find new reading material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I tried checking our PG a couple days ago... but I wasn't about to wade through thousands of books by title or by author. I wish there were some kind of categorical organization going on. You know, like there is at the library.

    1. Re:Hard to find new reading material by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try again ... harder!

      You can search by SUBJECT. You know. Like at a LIBRARY.

  59. World Domination through Literature by gbnewby · · Score: 1
    The short answer is, we are also interested in post-1922 literature. The Project Gutenberg Plan for World Domination through Literature ;-) is to get it all!!! Some "growth areas" include:
    • Translations and other transformations of public domain works (such transformations get their own copyright, but we're seeing more that comes in with CreativeCommons or similar licenses)
    • Copyrighted works submitted by contemporary authors. We have a standard non-exclusive permission procedure for this, see our HOWTO at ibiblio.org/gutenberg
    • Works from 1922 through 1964 that were not renewed. While proving non-renewal has historically been very hard, we are working to make this much easier by digitizing renewal records. In the hundreds of years of copyright registration, only about 10% is ever renewed -- that means that literally millions of items that were registered from 1922-1964 are now public domain, but we need proof from the renewal records. More our copyright howto at the site mentioned above.
    • 2018 is nearly upon us. If copyright is not extended further, we'll once again start getting a year's work added to the public domain each year. (That was the case, until the Bono act of 1998 halted this growth of the public domain for 20 years)

    Also, we continue to work with the EFF and ACLU to challenge copyright extension activities. You can expect a rigorous challenge, if YACTE (Yet Another Copyright Term Extension) is proposed in Congress (there were 14 extensions during the 20th century!).

    • Greg (Project Gutenberg's CEO
  60. Books warez... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

    Project Gutenberg is good and I've read quite a few decent works from them, but their problem is... that they are legal. And as such they just don't have many of the books I could find in a library (or couldn't because they were just borrowed by someone else). I found most of the titles I wanted to read on P2P though. All of Pratchett, whole Zelazny's Amber, some "classics" like LOTR (completely unreachable in library, and bookstores only sell a new hard cover edition that costs a fortune), Neuromancer, all of Stanislaw Lem and many more. And of course quite a few books on computers, programming etc. O'Reilly's mostly,]
    Yeah, it's copyrighted. So if I erase the files from my harddrive after I read them, wouldn't this be equal to borrowing them from library?

    --
    45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    1. Re:Books warez... by fadeaway · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, it's copyrighted. So if I erase the files from my harddrive after I read them, wouldn't this be equal to borrowing them from library?

      No. The copyright holder didn't recieve any compensation from you downloading the electronic transcription of their work. A library book is paid for once at the very least when it is obtained by the library.

      Break out the eye patch buddy.. YARR!

    2. Re:Books warez... by arkhan_jg · · Score: 1
      Well, the person who scanned and OCR'd the book in the first place presumably bought it.

      Thing is, if you look at the Baen Free Library you'll see a number of arguments as to why free ebooks can actually increase sales, the main one of which is this:

      If you download a free copy of something, it's probably because you didn't think it was worth the price being charged, or you couldn't afford it. The first type wouldn't buy it whether there's an illegal copy or not; the second will probably buy it at a later time in life.

      Many an author (and recording artist) will tell you, it's getting promotion and recognition that's hard. Word of mouth is the best kind, and trying something out when you're young and broke is likely to lead to purchases and re-purchases when you're older and want 'proper' copies.

      Good authors and artists have nothing to fear from copies of their work on the internet; in fact, for any but the already most mega-promoted, it's a boon to them.

      People are used to free books and free music from the library and the radio; trying to put the genie back in the bottle now, even though technically in the right under copyright law, is going to prove impossible.

      --
      Remember kids, it's all fun and games until someone commits wholesale galactic genocide.
    3. Re:Books warez... by Burb · · Score: 1

      Wow. You can afford to access slashdot, but can't afford a couple of bucks/pounds/euro's for a Pratchett? I'm stunned.
      My local bookstore's kneehigh in paperback editions of LOTR.

      --

    4. Re:Books warez... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      well for "Classics" like LOTR, try Half.com or your local thrift store, or even a "Used" book store... or Half Price Books

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    5. Re:Books warez... by nagora · · Score: 1
      Good authors and artists have nothing to fear from copies of their work on the internet

      World of your own, son.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    6. Re:Books warez... by doublem · · Score: 1

      Good authors and artists have nothing to fear from copies of their work on the internet

      Which explains why the RIAA is so upset about their skanks ho "singers" having their music on the Internet.

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
    7. Re:Books warez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just had a look at your own works and understood how little they are worth, compating to what you ask for them, and felt very afraid, what happens to your income if people start paying you what they are really worth, didn't you?

    8. Re:Books warez... by SharpFang · · Score: 1

      Note I'm not US-based. LOTR at used books store costs about the same as my monthly net access, which is about 1/3 my monthly bursary. I'm not quite ready to sacrifice that much of my money for something I could download off the web for free. Of course I found some real bargains for books I'd like to have on the net (good books under $0.50) but then shipping charges apply, and that's often $20-$30... Do you know how much is $30 for a student in Poland?

      --
      45 5F E1 04 22 CA 29 C4 93 3F 95 05 2B 79 2A B2
    9. Re:Books warez... by stanmann · · Score: 1

      Yes, I do... 18.25 from my location...

      --
      Food not Bombs is a nice platitude but it breaks down when you notice that the Bombees are usually well fed
    10. Re:Books warez... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, the person who scanned and OCR'd the book in the first place presumably bought it.
      And long after that original book has fallen apart due to wear and age, there will still be thousands of extant digital copies making the rounds on p2p... Whereas a librarian would have to purchase a replacement copy. Also, library books wear out much more quickly than privately owned books, because they tend to get more use.

      Multiply this by the hundreds of thousands of libraries around the world which are perpetually purchasing and replacing copies of the book, and I think you will agree that this is an extremely poor analogy for p2p, where it is only strictly necessary for one copy to be purchased, ever.

      As for the argument that free ebooks increase sales, that may or may not be true; however, it is still entirely up to the author/publisher to decide whether or not to take advantage of the opportunity. How they market their property is up to them, not to p2p users.

      Let's stop comparing apples and oranges, please. There is no justification for downloading books illegally.

    11. Re:Books warez... by nagora · · Score: 1
      what happens to your income if people start paying you what they are really worth,

      Ah, to be 16 again! People pay what they feel like paying. Some will pay, say $3 for a paperback, most will pay nothing.

      Unlike a film or record there is no inherent advantage to the non-pirated version and unlike software there is no market in post-purchase support (Having trouble reading? Phone our helpline at $1/minute). If books are available on-line for no cost then almost no one will be able to afford the luxury of being a writer. Simple fact of life.

      The people that do support the notion are generally people with nothing of their own worth paying for or those who can afford the luxury of being an un-paid writer: the Stephen Kings and such like that have already made more money than they can spend. It's no big deal for them to throw away the odd title here and there.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    12. Re:Books warez... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      there is no inherent advantage to the non-pirated version

      A printed copy is easier to read and travels better. It also looks a lot better on a book shelf.

      If books are available on-line for no cost then almost no one will be able to afford the luxury of being a writer. Simple fact of life.

      It's not a simple fact of life; it's an prediction.

      The people that do support the notion are generally [...] the Stephen Kings and such like that have already made more money than they can spend. It's no big deal for them to throw away the odd title here and there.

      That doesn't match with what I've seen. Baen.com has a lot of books available free by authors, like say Paul Chafe and Ellen Guon, who I don't recognize and given my knowledge of the scifi genre, I'd be surprised if they're even paying the bills by their writing, as well as authors who are fairly well known and authors like Larry Niven who are closer to Stephen King then to starving. Another example would by Janis Ian, who gave PG a copy of "Society's Child". According to her website, she does private performances, not the sign of a rich performer. Cory Doctorow sold at least one copy of his book to someone who never would have heard of him without him posting it on a website.

    13. Re:Books warez... by nagora · · Score: 1
      A printed copy is easier to read and travels better.

      This is a temporary advantage until digital paper or hi-res screens take hold.

      It also looks a lot better on a book shelf.

      Alright, that's true but of little interest to the majority of readers who are not collectors.

      It's not a simple fact of life; it's an prediction.

      Well, it's a prediction based on the whole history of mankind. I suppose human nature could change drastically in the next few years...

      According to her website, she does private performances, not the sign of a rich performer.

      Yes, I admit there is a potential role in getting your career started in today's system where most books are sold on paper for money. The on-line market can get you an initial step up when you can't find a publisher. But in a world where all, or the vast majority of, books are freely available on-line there is no next step: getting a name for yourself on-line does not lead to a paying career in the "real" book market for the simple reason that there is no real book market left.

      The same arguments will raise their heads when we all have enough bandwidth to ditch mp3/ogg and simply download uncompressed music which can be burnt to discs. Why, if this was legal, would anyone pay for music ever again? One answer is that some people will want to pay their favorite acts out of gratitude. But what fraction of the, for example, teen market would do that? Sure, I'd be happy to pay Blue Oyster Cult directly and cut out the middle men but I'm not a typical music fan. In the same way, I'd pay the author but I'm not a typical book-reader either.

      In short: instant, non-DRM, full-quality downloads with a PayPal (or whatever) option on the one hand increases the percentage of the customer's money that goes to the creators but at the same time, it reduces the paying market to the small number that we would today call "collectors". Which factor dominates? I'd bet almost anything that the second factor is the bigger in terms of revenue, by far. Which is bad news if you're the creator in question.

      TWW

      --
      "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
    14. Re:Books warez... by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Alright, that's true but of little interest to the majority of readers who are not collectors.

      Really? If people don't want a hard-copy, why do they buy most new books at all? There's enough used book stores and libraries to avoid all but a few new book buys.

      The on-line market can get you an initial step up when you can't find a publisher.

      That's not why my examples show, though. Janis Ian is signed with a recording company; the authors at Baen.com all have published books with Baen.com. But even if you have a publisher, you need to get your name out to the audience, and that's what these sites do.

      Why, if this was legal, would anyone pay for music ever again?

      This is a different case. If all music were available online, live concerts would probably be a larger part of the music scene. In any case, the economics of music is different from that of books.

      In the same way, I'd pay the author but I'm not a typical book-reader either.

      Why do you think that you're all that untypical? Honestly, book reading in our society is no longer the common thing it was when preachers railed against the 'sinful' dime novels at the turn of the century; leisure reading is largely the audience of a much smaller group. True, a lot of the Star Trek novels might have a large read to pay ratio, but most of the more intellectual authors have a loving audience that would pay for hardcopy - which we can see, because they are already the audience who choses to frequent the new book stores instead of the used book stores or libraries.

  61. Now that all these books are available... by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    How can I listen to them on the go?

    1. Re:Now that all these books are available... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      about 600 audio books are available from gutenberg.
      see http://www.radio-gutenberg.com

    2. Re:Now that all these books are available... by doublem · · Score: 1

      The best way is to have someone read it.

      I've always wanted to get together a group to record these great works under some kind of GPL or BSD like license, but never had the time^X^X^X^X energy to make it happen.

      The text to speach software out there is OX for reading the news to the blind, but sounds pretty much the same as the old "Speak and Spell" from the 80's. It's a crime against the visually impared.

      That said, you can get books on tape and CD from the library and audible.com offers audio books for download at a very reasonable price. (Especally if you get one of their subscription programs that comes with their portable audio device.)

      --
      "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  62. -1, Redundant by onomatomania · · Score: 1

    My, how many people rushed to provide a link to the Distributed Proofreading site. Next time, could you all try maybe reading the comments first? There must be at least 10 posts cheerfully urging one to try out the site, as if no one else had mentioned it yet. That's great and all, but how about we just mod up whoever was first and mod down the rest. This is truly what the "Redundant" moderation option is for.

    1. Re:-1, Redundant by apsmith · · Score: 1

      Being one of the redundant ones :-)

      The original story was remiss in not mentioning DP. I posted my comment within about 30 seconds of seeing the article - obviously there were a LOT of us with the same issue.

      --

      Energy: time to change the picture.

  63. Yes, please, yes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A year ago PG saw a huge spike in volunteer proofreaders due to being slashdotted. It greatly increased their productivity, led to wonderful new document guidelines, and was great (altho stressful at first).

  64. OMFG!!!! 33 years for 10,000 books?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Amazon only took, like, a week before they had that many books available! ROTFLMAO!!!! :D

    Hey... does anyone know how I get to the "cyber" rooms (wink wink) on this AOL Slashdot thing?

  65. "originals" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Modern translators resort to what copies of original texts they can find (which do not include the desert finds of recent decades, because they have not been released to the public). They most certainly do not have access to the sources that were used for the Vulgate translation, centuries ago. This is why it is a complicated question which translation track is better.

  66. How to format Gutenberg to Palm: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    In your favorite text editor:
    1. Find a character not in the text (# generally works)

    2. Append # to the end of every line.

    3. Replace all [newline]#[newline] with [newline][newline]

    4. Replace all #[newline][newline] with [newline][newline]

    4.5 (check if -# is a split word--if it is, replace -#[newline] with nothing.)

    5. Replace all # with [space]

    All paragraphs are now single lines. They fold nicely on a PDA.

  67. Behold yon glittering host, your future spoil! by peacetrain · · Score: 1

    First gain the conquest, then reward the toil. Ironically, I was just reading Pope's Iliad translation before popping onto /. Have been wanting to read it for years, but couldn't find it anywhere in print - so I nearly jizzed when I found it on Gutenberg.

  68. How appropriate... by adam872 · · Score: 1

    ...that such an important document in the history of human civiization is #10000. Lovers of freedom and more importantly those who would take it away (are you listening John Ashcroft?) should take the time to read this. For my money, it forms the basis of the common law system that we take for granted in the west today.

  69. Please support project Project Guttenberg! by Rotten168 · · Score: 1

    Yes... with your help Steve Guttenberg will be a star once again! Give before it hurts!

  70. 1984 and Sherlock Holmes... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I can read that anywhere with an internet connection. ^^

    Thanks PG. Go reading!

  71. plain ASCII makes no sense by CoughDropAddict · · Score: 0, Redundant

    As with the last story about project Gutenberg, I have the same comment. I love the philosophy of project Gutenberg, but the fact that they continue to use plain text as the canonical formatting makes the collection seriously less useful. Using XML would give only advantages.

    What advantages? Advantages like indicating what words are actually part of a title, so that a reader could display titles in large print and provide a table of contents. Advantages like having real bold, italic, and underline. Advantages like being able to handle characters not in ASCII. Advantages like allowing a reader to break lines however makes most sense for that situation (for example, handhelds are going to have shorter lines than a large monitor). The list goes on.

    Their argument for continuing to favor ASCII is to support the widest possible usability, now and in the future, since markup languages can come and go. This doesn't stand up to scrutiny though, for the simple reason that XML contains strictly more information than plain text. XML can be flawlessly converted to plain text by a program, but the opposite is not true: plain text cannot be converted to XML. Was that line break the end of a stanza, or simply a line of a paragraph? Is that single line in all-caps a title or is it a paragraph of shouting? This information simply cannot be extracted from plain text. Not to mention the problem of characters that aren't in ASCII.

    Suppose that XML is just a fad, that it's a horrible joke being perpetuated by hordes of clueless professionals who love buzzwards. Suppose no one uses XML in 10 years. Even if this is true XML is still a better choice than plain text because XML has enough information to automatically convert the books into whatever superior format emerges in the future. Plain text does not.

    1. Re:plain ASCII makes no sense by dvdeug · · Score: 1

      Using XML would give only advantages.

      That's absurd. Of course, there are disadvantages to XML:

      Everyone can write plain text; there are very few people who know enough to write XML long-hand. XML is in discussion in Distributed Proofreaders, and we got several answers amounting to "Whatever. You have totally confused me. So long as I don't have to touch it, I don't care.".

      Not everyone has the programs to transform XML into something usable. The DTD's haven't been created, and even where they have been, the programs to convert the XML to plain text and other formats just aren't available in easy to install packages on every platform.

      XML takes work. It is a lot easier to take the raw output of proofers and turn it into text then it is turn it into XML.

      We are trying to change to XML, but we can't do it until we have something that all our proofers - including the computer-illiterate ones - can handle with confidence.

      Not to mention the problem of characters that aren't in ASCII.

      Which is a moot point. When we have characters that aren't in ASCII we can use Latin-1 or UTF-8. Even if we go to XML, there's no guarentee that any of these characters will be used. The HTML books in PG sometimes don't have the Greek untransliterated or -- turned back into real emdashes, much less proper Unicode quotes. Our one Sanskrit text is in ASCII transliteration, not because of any PG rules, but because that's what the creators felt comfortable working with.

      Suppose that XML is [...] a horrible joke being perpetuated by hordes of clueless professionals who love buzzwards. Suppose no one uses XML in 10 years.

      Then there are good reasons people quit using XML, probably having to do with it being oververbose and too painful to work with. In that case, racking our proofers over the coals for some minor advantage would not be a good thing.

  72. Very Well Said! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a few subscriptions of magazines available free on the net for the very same reason!

  73. Question on queue or rejected "stories"... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hello "Chris Brewer" or anyone else,

    What URL did you visit to receive the information on rejected stories? T

  74. Yes yes yes I *know* about the history by meehawl · · Score: 1

    But why the prohibition? Why would pastoral societies adopt as a general rule laws against the accumulation of capital. Think about it.

    --

    Da Blog
    1. Re:Yes yes yes I *know* about the history by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Because Jesus prohibited it. Doesn't matter how logical it might seem, if God comes down from on high and specificly preaches against it, you assume your logic is wrong and follow along. At least if you are a beliver (or as some would say: pretending to be a beliver).

  75. Re:I read it as more "de minimis non curat lex" by The+Winter+Queen · · Score: 1

    I've read quite a few books from PG. I reread the Oz series, and now I'm working through all the Edgar Rice Burroughs books.

    It's not as good as having a real book in you hands, but it's been fun to have access to all these fun old stories.

  76. Magna Carta by Ignominious+Poltroon · · Score: 1

    Magna Carta Visa Carta Master Charga

  77. BIG CONGRATULATIONS! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I applaud Project Gutenberg and Micheal Hart! Congratualtions on a MAJOR acheivement. I have found this project to be very interesting and useful. THANK-YOU!

  78. Let us take one step at a time. by Walabio · · Score: 1

    If it would be my job to upgrade the texts of Project Gutenberg, this is what I would do:

    1. I would would have the proofreaders create new texts as Text/Plain with a textencoding of UTF-8. This way, one can use all of Unicode (if one needs it). Old texts can be converted from Text/Plain with a textencoding of US-ASCII to Text/Plain with a textencoding of UTF-8 if the original has non-US-ASCII characters.
    2. I would markup the Text/Plains with a textencoding of UTF-8 to Application/Xhtml+Xmls with a textencoding of UTF-8.
    3. Both the Text/Plains and the Application/Xhtml+Xmls would go into the public domain.

    The reason I would do things in two steps is because the Optical Character-Recognition cannot be trusted in a direct conversion from paper to Application/Xhtml+Xml or other form of Text/Xml. The Optical Character-Recognition cannot even reliably recognize all of the characters in US-ASCII. Dirct conversion paper to a Text/Xml with a textencoding of UTF-8 would drive the proofreaders crazy. Both the humans and the software would choke on direct conversion to Text/Xml with a textencoding of UTF-8. Direct conversion from paper to Text/Xml with a textencoding of UTF-8 is too much too soon.

    Recreations of all new texts and conversion of existing texts to Text/Plain with a textencoding of UTF-8 is a good idea, as is markup of Text/plains with a textencoding of UTF-8 to Application/Xhtml+Xml with a textencoding of UTF-8.

  79. a great read! by hendrix69 · · Score: 1

    Search the Magna Carta for "jew".

    --
    The power of Christ compiles you!
  80. Re:e-reader hardware? YBOOK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yBook

    www.spacejock.com

    Freeware, Windows or Linux with Wine, nice little app.

  81. Shackleton by Dan-DAFC · · Score: 1

    The only thing I read from Project Gutenburg was Earnest Shackleton's "South" the remarkable story of his expedition to Antarctica that set off in 1914 just the first world war was breaking out. I read it after having seen Channel 4's dramatisation with Kenneth Brannagh.

    The expedition went pear shaped but all of the men survived for two years in the Antarctic Circle - camped out on floating pieces of ice, eating penguins and seals, travelling 900 miles across the most inhospitable sea on the planet in an open-topped lifeboat and not one of them died.

    It was an interesting read but I'd have preferred a paper version, my eyes hurt when I had finished.

    --
    Suck figs.
  82. Michael Hart is a true visionary by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    For better or for worse--IMHO mostly for better--all of the characteristics of PG have been very carefully thought out and articulated. Things such as the emphasis on "plain vanilla ASCII text" are not simply historical accident, but a very conscious decision. PG has already outlived several changes in fashion on text formatting. (Can you imagine what would happened if they had adopted, say, Wordstar formatting? Or even TROFF?)

    It is a strikingly original project. And it has some quasi-political overtones. Hart has some well-articulated reasons why he didn't and doesn't believe that, say, the Library of Congress will ever get around to systematically digitizing books.

    With approimately 20,000 books online, it is no longer a sarcasm to call the Internet a library, even if it is still far less rich than a small-town public library. Half of those are Project Gutenberg's.

  83. Project Gutenberg Australia has more recent works by dpbsmith · · Score: 1

    Incidentally, there is a Project Gutenberg Australia which has quite a few works online which are still under copyright in the United States but not in Australia. Those seeking works more recent than 1923 or so might find it worthwhile taking a look there.

    Keep in mind that if you don't reside in Australia you would be committing copyright infringement if you were to download anything from that site that is still under copyright in your country of residence.

    Go to their site to see what they have, or use the invaluable U. Penn online books page to search for them.

  84. Re:Forget Palmdoc try Ztxt format in Weasel Reader by ShavenYak · · Score: 1

    If your Palm has an SD slot, though, why not grab an SD card and fill it with PalmDoc ebooks? Then you don't have to worry so much about file sizes and you don't have to install another piece of sotware (doesn't PalmReader come with most recent Palms?).

    --

    Hey kids, there's only 5 days left 'til Yak Shaving Day!
  85. Personal preference by tomzyk · · Score: 1
    In other words, it is nice to get away from the computer sometimes and just read.
    Yes, but sometimes it's nice to have an electronic document to read off of your computer screen so when someone walks past your desk during business hours, you can tell them you're "researching for an upcoming project" while you're actually reading about nanotechnology or something else that interests you.

    Personally, I applaud the efforts of this project. Once products like ePaper begin to be mass-produced and available to the public, you will be able to have YOUR way (tactile reading) and I will still be able to have MINE (be able to read the same document off of a computer screen). Well, I actually DO like books, but I'm just trying to say that having a CHOICE is a GREAT thing.

    And FURTHERMORE, once all of these books get converted from plain text files into XML files, you'll be able to apply whatever your favorite stylesheet is to it to have your own personalized reading experience. (Examples: If you're older and have vision problems, you can have bigger fonts. Maybe you prefer plain black text on white background; maybe you prefer green text on a black background with a Courier New font. It's up to you!)

    And of course, speaking of vision problems, you can also have a text-to-speach program READ the text to blind people (or people who like audio books) as well!

    Ain't technology a wonderful thing?!? :)
    --
    Karma: NaN
  86. Distribution by clckwrkMalChick · · Score: 1
    Maybe they should take something like BitTorrent to start distributing these books. The load on those http and ftp servers would probably be dramatically dropped. It might also be good proof to naysayers that peer to peer networks have a legitimate purpose.

    --

    -=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-
    What would Yossarian do?
  87. eInk by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Oops. I actually meant eInk not ePaper. (flexible digital paper where you only need an electrical current to change the pages, but not to keep it turned on.)

    --
    Karma: NaN
  88. Been done by tomzyk · · Score: 1

    Probably about a year or two ago I read about some (Australian?) company that was creating kiosks, for airports at first, to actually PRINT out an entire book for you. Kind of like a book vending machine. You put your money in, select the book you want from the list of thousands in their database and it would print out the whole book for you in paperback in roughly 10-15 minutes... neatly bound and pictures and everything.

    Although, since I haven't heard much of it in a while, I'm assuming they either ran out of funding, it took too long (and used too much ink) to print out the books to be worthwhile, or publishing companies were starting to throw fits about it.

    --
    Karma: NaN
  89. I like the idea. by doublem · · Score: 1

    First, mirror the site, then set up an eDonkey server. It's a bit more mature and as the MST3K Digital Archive Project can attest, generally a bit more convient for keeping large archives online. Even the best Bittorrent clients out there still parse the entire file on each program load. Not a good thing when dealing with a few gigs of data.

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  90. Coming soon... by ecloud · · Score: 1

    ebook readers with real CRTs and vacuum-tube drivers, rather than cold silicon transistors and LCDs. Finally... ebooks with _warmth_, and that glow and smell associated so fondly with vacuum tubes. The pixels will blur together slighly, making a smoother display and making digital source material seem analogue again. Requires one A battery, one B, 4 C cells, and your choice of books on special miniature magnetic tapes. Fresnel magnifier sold separately.

    (...ducks...)

    Better get a patent on it while it's hot.

  91. Re:Forget Palmdoc try Ztxt format in Weasel Reader by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a Handspring Visor that does not have a flashable rom. You can upgrade the OS, but it will be on the actual 8mb Ram. I do not care as long it is works and would not scarifice the space. My Handspring does not come with Palmreader.

    I could get more ram for my Visor with a Springboard attachment but I have seen some cheap PDAs selling on ebay, I may as well buy a newer one used from ebay instead of invest in this old one(the only feature I would like is built in lithuim batteries, color would be nice and a faster processor, but only for playing games on it). The only thing I use it for is reading ebooks, typing in data in these things is a joke, even something like the phone book is too cumbersome, much better to use pen and paper!

    Gutenpalm is just better in my opinion for reading texts than Palmdoc. It saves considerable space compared to Palmdoc, its features are better than most Palmdoc readers and it is open source and free, what more is there to want? I am not reading texts here that are so huge that they cannot fit on 8mb. This is all I am really using my PDA for, to read pirated books and to read old books from Gutenberg.

  92. Only plain ASCII makes no sense by oldstrat · · Score: 1


    Only plain ascii can guarantee the largest possible access to the documents.

    This as you reference was by design and has positive indications for both creation and retrieval.
    That simple clear text file can be created on the most humble of computers, printed on virutally any printer with or without WP software, and viewed on any device that has the ability to hold the plain text file and display in monochrome, or print.

    Maximum access was the point of Project Gutenberg.
    Only Ascii can satisfy that in the core project.

    From the projects history and philosophy, "The value of Plain Vanilla ASCII is obvious. . .so is very much of the value of most of the various markup systems we have in the world. But until some real standards arrive-- we would be limiting our options a great deal if we do not keep copies of all etexts in Plain Vanilla ASCII as well. "

    XML is not forbidden, but for inclusion in the project core ascii is required. You or anyone else are welcome to process them into XML but the volunteers who are so few, so valuable, and so varied cannot be required to add the work that XML would require.

    10,000 is a major accompishment. And in my opinion in it's own way comparable to anything ever done by any group for the selfless betterment of all mankind. PG deserves a Nobel prize.

  93. Septuagint by Burb · · Score: 1

    Unfortunately this view of the Septuagint has no direct historic evidence, so ultimately accepting it is an act of faith. It's true that the gospel writers were familiar with the septuagint, judging from the ways in which the OT is quoted. And it's an extremely valuable witness to the text alongside the Masoretic and other Jewish sources. But there's no way of *proving* that it's the best witness to the text.

    --

  94. amazon and free by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what with amazon's "view the page of the book containing the word you searched for", it shouldn't be too hard to add another 10,000 books to the free online library.