Slashdot Mirror


Take Your Vitamins, On Pain Of Pain

dacap writes "The American diet continues to deteriorate. In the news is the exacerbation of bone disease from a deficiency of vitamin D. Too little vitamin D also causes muscle pain and joint problems. How is it that we let something so easily remedied affect us? Details are in USA Today. The ultimate solution to this and many other health-related problems that techies suffer is a proper diet coupled with a multivitamin supplement and regular exercise. Too bad that these choices are so unpopular. A sound mind and sound body go together."

101 comments

  1. Let me just translate... by FinestLittleSpace · · Score: 3, Funny

    Translated:
    "Americans are, as a whole, fat, unhealthy, lazy, arrogant bastards"

    (I'll go find some exceptions in a few minutes)

    1. Re:Let me just translate... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Americans are, as a whole, fat, unhealthy, lazy, arrogant bastards

      I am all of the above except arrogant---Im way too lazy to be arrogant.

  2. Milk by jodio · · Score: 1

    Just drink about a litre of milk a day. You'll be fine.

    1. Re:Milk by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 2, Informative
      Just drink about a litre of milk a day.

      Milk - especially cow's milk - should be taken in moderation or not at all. Many adults have some degree of lactose intolerance; the concentrated protien of milk (and other animal products) is detrimental to proper calcium balance; milk is commonly contaminated with pus and with drug residues; it's high in fat and low in iron. The high milk consumption in the U.S. is a marketing triumph, not a healthy habit.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    2. Re:Milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm lactose intolerant, you insensitive clod!

    3. Re:Milk by pmz · · Score: 1



      Does the culture for yogurt and cheese consume the pus? I have yet to taste the pus in yogurt, but, perhaps, that's just the blueberries covering it up.

      Seriously, though, it's interesting that human milk contains more fatty acids than cow's milk. If that isn't an argument in favor of breast-feeding, I don't know what is (our kids gotta have brains, you know).

    4. Re:Milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      You lactose bigots should be taken out and shot!

    5. Re:Milk by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Some few quick points:
      1. P-R-O-T-E-I-N spells protein.

      2. Several humans suffer digestive or other disorders which may make drinking milk less palatable to those affected. This is a VERY, VERY SMALL MINORITY OF HUMANS, however.

      3. One should avoid, when trying to be taken seriously by others, the use of nebulous neologisms such as "proper calcium balance". Ask a physician to tell you the definition of "proper calcium balance". He does not know? Well, I never! These word salads are meaningless outpourings of lies and ignorance. Do not perpetuate their existence.

      4. Is milk often contaminated by the presence of pus and drug residues? Fascinating. AND.....???????? Do you contend that you have evidence to support a claim of "unhealthy milk?" If so, please publish your work in this area, along with any appropriate academic, intellectual, professional and educational credentials. Or you could shut up rather than lie and scream.

      5. WHOLE cow milk (that's right, the bog-standard unmodified bloody pasteurised milk) contains LESS THAN 4% FAT. -- Again, that was LESS THAN 4% FAT. High in fat?!?

      6. ..... retard! :) B.

    6. Re:Milk by azav · · Score: 1

      It's more expensive than cow milk but I drink Meyenberg Goat milk.

      I know. It sounds really strange but the taste is good, my skin is happier for it and the goat milk yoghurt with a touch of vanilla & splenda is amazing.

      Ya, I know. It sounds REALLY weird but you've gotta try it.

      Many people I know had skin problems that cleared up when they switched OFF cow milk and foods with a lot of sugar (coke, OJ, fruit smoothies).

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  3. Ultraviolet by pswnet · · Score: 2, Informative

    How about sunbathing between 08.00-10.00 a.m. Exposure to sunlight is one of the main sources of vitamin D

    1. Re:Ultraviolet by Abcd1234 · · Score: 1

      Actually, it's vitally important, also, that you don't bathe before sunbathing. I know, sounds funny, but vitamin D is produced through sun exposure by reacting with sweat on the skin. So, if you go and take a shower, and then lay out in the sun, you'll have very little vitamin D production.

      So, I guess your average geek would do well to just get out in the sun once in a while. :)

  4. This isn't really too suprising by eXtro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Even in high school physical education hardly any time was spent on learning about caring for your body. You'd learn various sports, spend a bit of time learning to dance and a little bit of time learning how to not knock up a girl. No time that I can recall was spent on learning how to stretch or how to build a meal that has all the nutrients you need. I've learned a lot of these things on my own but most of the other engineers I work with never did and just bitch and moan that they're sore after 30 minutes of water skiing, don't have any energy while pounding a Big Mac, fries and a gallon of Coca-Cola into their mouths.

    1. Re:This isn't really too suprising by rritterson · · Score: 1

      What you say is true for me too. However, I was forced to learn basic nutrition 6 years in a row as we had both phy ed and health classes. (6 years starting in fifth grade)

      --
      -Ryan
      AUWYHSTOT (Acronyms are Useless When You Have to Spell Them Out Too)
    2. Re:This isn't really too suprising by yerricde · · Score: 1

      You don't need PE to learn to dance. All you need is DDR (no, not the RAM). Score -1 against public schools' PE programs.

      --
      Will I retire or break 10K?
    3. Re:This isn't really too suprising by pmz · · Score: 1

      how to build a meal that has all the nutrients you need

      If they taught this, it would be based on a government-sanctioned special-interest-group-purchased food pyramid of some form rather than a system based on sound nutritional science and generally agreed-upon principles among nutritionists (if they exist...just in the last couple years I learned of all sorts of different fats all of which are both good and bad for me...I guess they're still climing the learning curve and will be for quite some time).

    4. Re:This isn't really too suprising by ChickenAintDone · · Score: 0
      At my high school they require us to take a semester of Personal Fitness and a semester of Life Management. Life Management is all about eating healthy, motivation, goals, drugs, and sex. Personal Fitness is about the importance of exercising and stretching, and how to do both of them, also again emphasizing a healthy diet based on how active you are.

      Maybe it's just my high school, or maybe this is new and you're just old as shit ;).

    5. Re:This isn't really too suprising by splattertrousers · · Score: 1

      Recent studies have shown that stretching before exercise has no effect. So quit wasting your time stretching and get more exercise.

    6. Re:This isn't really too suprising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to understand that many of the PE programs in America were designed in the 1950's. The curriculum is sorely outdated and needs reform. Get involved with your local school board and make the change happen.

    7. Re:This isn't really too suprising by onco_p53 · · Score: 1

      Reference please.

  5. Although... by Otter · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The American diet continues to deteriorate.

    That's the spin in the article but there's no evidence given of any factor that has changed. Or even numbers to support a rise in rickets.

    My guess is that a combination of kids' drinking less milk in favor of Mountain Dew and Big Gulps and their spending less time outside makes up a large part of the problem, but who knows? Clearly, a lot of it is simply that the UK and northern US simply get so little sun that the risk is always there.

    1. Re:Although... by pmz · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I'm waiting for "Mountain Dew with Calcium". Of course, shit in a bottle with a couple vitamins is already sold to naive mothers as "Sunny D."

      Why not just feed the damn kids real fruit juice! It actually isn't that expensive!!! If you want to get the same effect of those "fruit drinks" pour about one ounze of OJ into a glass and fill the rest with tap water.

    2. Re:Although... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      Why not just feed the damn kids real fruit juice! It actually isn't that expensive!!! If you want to get the same effect of those "fruit drinks" pour about one ounze of OJ into a glass and fill the rest with tap water.

      Don't forget the High Fructose Corn Syrup. It just won't taste right otherwise.

      Seriously though, I don't think it's a good idea to give kids juice all the time. Sure, it's better than Pepsi, but it shouldn't be all they ever drink. I wonder how many cases of "ADD" or "hyperactivity" or whatever they're calling it this week would be cured by just making the kids drink water when they're thirsty.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    3. Re:Although... by pmz · · Score: 1

      Seriously though, I don't think it's a good idea to give kids juice all the time.

      I agree and wasn't trying to advocate otherwise. Fruit juice is a food and not necessarily a beverage. Also, while the fructose takes longer to break down and has less "kick" than corn syrup and refined sugar, it is sugar nonetheless.

      ...making the kids drink water when they're thirsty.

      I dunno, they might not drink it unless it is in a bottle with an Extreme label featuring a rapper with a gun aimed at his bitch or something. Also, it has to be green and taste like hypermelon (or whatever they call that new flavor, lately).

    4. Re:Although... by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      lol "I dunno, they might not drink it unless it is in a bottle with an Extreme label featuring a rapper with a gun aimed at his bitch or something. Also, it has to be green and taste like hypermelon (or whatever they call that new flavor, lately)."

      Dude, thats classic.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Although... by MrResistor · · Score: 1

      It all comes down to the parents, they're the ones who set up the paterns from the beginning. My daughter (3.5 years) asks for water when she's thirsty. More importantly, when she's thirsty it doesn't occur to her to ask for anything else even though she knows that there's milk, juice, and soda in the fridge. We didn't "get lucky", it's the direct result of a decision we made as parents.

      I was home sick the other day and caught a bit of Dr Phil. A mom was complaining that all her kids ate was junk food. Dr Phil replied, "who keeps buying the junk food?" I think that about sums it up.

      What my daughter does beg for, however, is Robotech. Consequently, I'm going to stop here.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    6. Re:Although... by zora · · Score: 1

      have you seen Maddox's take on the whole Extreme Marketing

      --
      In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet, and say to us, "Make us your slaves, but feed us." - Dostoevsky
  6. Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, benefits of milk are largely contested. Generaly, only north americans drink milk during their mature life. Montignac's last book (I never read any of his books) discuss the milk myth.

    On the multivitamin issue, these are really "dangerous" if taken everyday. This was the result of an study I made many years ago. The reason is simple, multivitamins added to normal meal might give you too much of liposoluble vitamins and makes you sick ! (liposolubles are elements that goes in the body fat and stays and accumulates there, may eventually generate problems...)

    I guess the trick is easy, just eat a balanced diet. (but what is balance ? ;-)

    1. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Mattcelt · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There are only 3 or 4 liposoluble vitamins - A, K, D and some forms of E. All other vitamins are hydosoluble. The relative doses of these are taken into account with most products, and with the USRDA. You would have to be comatose in most cases not to use the amounts of liposoluble vitamins present in most multivitamins (at least in the US, don't know about elsewhere). It would take some work to overdose.

      To say that multivitamins are useless based on the presence of these few fat-soluble ones is sort of like saying that the ocean in useless because there are sharks. Nonsense.

      I have been taking Shaklee vitamins almost daily for 20+ years, and I can say with certainty that the benefits of taking them far outweigh any possible risks.

    2. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      Generaly, only north americans drink milk during their mature life.
      You've never been to the Netherlands! The huge majority (I would guess 90%) of Dutch drink milk during lunch. I have even been to places where there was only milk to drink, not even water!

      I guess the trick is easy, just eat a balanced diet. (but what is balance ? ;-)
      That's easy. A balance diet is a bit of everything.

      You don't need Montignac's books, you just need to eat a reasonable amount of varied food.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    3. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Lord+Satri · · Score: 1


      There is more than vitamins in multivitamins tablets !! You should not forget Calcium, Chrome, Copper, Iron, Iode, Magnesium, Manganese, Selenium, Zinc, all of which might be present and not necessarily liposolubles.

      Anyway, I'm no expert. And I agree, multivitamins *can* be good, it varies a lot depending on the person and tablet type. Just I wanted to express some important issues with them.

    4. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I can say with certainty that the benefits of taking them far outweigh any possible risks."

      No you can't. You don't have a control group, and your researchers (you) are biased and not blind to the study.

    5. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by isfuglen · · Score: 1

      >> Generaly, only north americans drink milk during their mature life.

      Let me guess. You've never spent time in Europe.


      --
      When life hands you lemons, grab the salt and pass the tequilla...
    6. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by John+Hasler · · Score: 1

      > Let me guess. You've never spent time in Europe.

      Or Africa or Central Asia.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
    7. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Mattcelt · · Score: 1

      Well, though you are correct in your assumptiong based on what I wrote. However, even though I did't cite these in the original post, yes, yes, I can.

    8. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or Australia.

      So, basically, the bloke lives in North America, assumes his fellow inhabitants are the original and unique milk-drinkers of the world.... W T F ?? ....moron :-)

    9. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      YES!! Thankyou for beating me to it.

      Let us work toward a "Never Mind The Bollocks: Here's Slashdot!" ideal of 'bullshitless' discussions.

      NMTB:HS!

    10. Re:Don't drink Milk or get multivitamines ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just do NOT understand either logical rigour OR the scientific method, do you?

      Now, gross ignorance is not ALWAYS a moral failing of commensurate scale, so I shall be merciful:

      LEARN THESE THINGS

      or

      DO NOT PARTICIPATE IN LEARNED DISCUSSIONS ABOVE YOUR ABILITY TO COMPREHEND AND CONTRIBUTE IN KIND.

      It is simple, mate. Don't talk above your station. Learn whereof you speak. THINK!

      B.

  7. Hard to understand... by Beatbyte · · Score: 2, Interesting

    how people who spend hours and hours working on a machine to make it pur like a kitten and run at its peak efficiency can eat garbage, fatty, high-carb food. and on top of it, not exercise.

    WHAT YOU PUT IN YOUR BODY, IS EQUIVALENT TO WHAT YOU GET OUT!

    It's like putting a 486SX with 8MB RAM in a cluster of decent machines and expecting it to do the same amount of work. I doesn't happen.

    Lots of water, vitamins, no fatty foods, moderate exercise = better quality of life, self-esteem, etc.

    And speaking as someone who has lost 40 lbs. in the last year, I can attest to that.

    1. Re:Hard to understand... by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 0, Troll
      "Speaking as someone who has lost 40 lbs", now you're going to criticize everyone else who is in the state you once were? Obviously you didn't follow your own advice for a significant period of time if you let yourself get to a point where losing 40 lbs would not drop you into a position of being underweight. So instead of criticizing people in a rude tone about how they are idiots for living Lifestyle X (when you yourself obviously lived Lifestyle X), why not offer encouragement and tell people how you were able to accomplish your weight loss?

      By the way, I am in great shape and have never been at the point where I could lose 40 lbs so don't e-mail me with your life story.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    2. Re:Hard to understand... by TamMan2000 · · Score: 1

      Going through substantial changes in your life can make this happen very easily. I was an underweight cross-country runner with an enourmous appitite in high school. When I went to college I discovered 1:00AM pizza, stopped running and I started to fill out, seemed natural... I used to be 6'1" and under 120 lbs. I needed the weight, well... weight gain has momentum, over the next 3 semesters, without even realizing it, I got up to 230. I started running again, and I was back down to 185 in a few months (I have since started lifting weights and am back up to 205).

      Big changes in your routine (going to college, starting full time work...) can cause this kind of thing to happen to almost anyone, the important thing is that you don't resign to being fat, and you get back to doing what works.

      --
      "I'll have a Guinness, no wait, make that a Coors Light" -Grad student I work with, who shall remain anonymous...
    3. Re:Hard to understand... by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 1
      But after losing weight, screaming at others about how pathetic and awful they are for not losing weight is simply foolish. It's nice to be proud of one's accomplishments but I doubt that anyone who reads the original poster's comment will feel like because some guy on Slashdot basically called them stupid for not losing weight, they have to lose weight.

      I've met a number of people who have lost significant amounts of weight in their life. Some of them are proud of it but not condescending about it to others. They don't see obese people and say to them, "You're disgusting." since they remember when they were just as obese. Others, the original poster for instance, become so proud of themselves that they forget what they went through and that they were once overweight. I think you missed the meaning of my comment based on your response.

      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    4. Re:Hard to understand... by lpp · · Score: 1

      I'm not one who typically "comment-metamods", but a Troll rating? For the parent comment?

      Folks, he has a point. If you had some problem, and it dawned on you that it was resolvable and then you fixed it, it is somewhat hypocritical to chastise others for the shortcoming you yourself suffered. The parent comment is simply saying, "Help a brother out" instead of "You idiot! What are you thinking?"

    5. Re:Hard to understand... by pmz · · Score: 1

      WHAT YOU PUT IN YOUR BODY, IS EQUIVALENT TO WHAT YOU GET OUT!

      Don't forget the irreversable chemical process that occurs, because what you get out ain't nearly as tasty.

    6. Re:Hard to understand... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are probably correct. Troll seems a slight bit overstated.

      Too bad they don't have a -1 Hypocrite because the poster is a pompous ass who would think nothing of taking a much harsher and more abusive tone on any subject he happens to think he knows something about.

  8. Go make money off of the low-life span types by whoda · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Fat people need to consume just as much as ever.

    Eventually they die, and need
    Fat caskets


    But, before you die, you should relax:
    Fat Vacations


    And of course they need a community to be a part of:
    Their own Internet 'Fat Portal'

    1. Re:Go make money off of the low-life span types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From Webmaster@fatcities.com

      Thanks for the plug. I wouln't have known you existed but for our stats report that shows links to this post about the Fatcities Portal.

      Obesity is just not a problem in the U.S, it's also 'de rigueur' in the UK. I ask myself how could that be, last I visited good ole England, I lost 12 pounds just from refraining to eat English fare, which, if you didn't know, does not have the reputation of being top of the list to most seasoned travelers.

      You should, perhaps, take a look at statistics for your little island regarding various factors, like, oh, your own obesity ratings, your very high unemployment rate, deficit on trade in goods and services, and last but not least, the general health of your nation, one in 10 people say their health is not good.

      http://www.statistics.gov.uk

      Please, no thanks necessary for giving you fodder for thought. Seeing as 6 out of 10 people are fat, according to government stats, I'll bet there are quite many of you posters out there, who will mosy over to Fatcities and 'join the crowd'.

      Best Regards,
      Harry
      webmaster
      Fatcities.com
      http:// www.fatcities.com

    2. Re:Go make money off of the low-life span types by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      from webmaster@fatcities.com

      Oh, yea, this is the link that you all will find most interesting:

      Sir John Bourn, head of the National Audit Office, told Parliament today that the prevalence of obesity in England had tripled over the last 20 years and continues to rise. Most adults in England are now overweight, and one in five is obese.
      Shoot, and these findings date back to 2001!

      Cheers,
      Harry
      webmaster@fatcities.com
      Fatciti es.com

  9. It's not just the USA by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Funny this should come up today, because in yesterday's paper here in the UK was a picture of a toddler from behind (I'd guess about 2-3 years old). She had quite severe ricketts (which is also caused by Vitamin D deficiency) such that her legs had a similar degree of curvature to a banana.

    You can blame Margaret Thatcher for stopping children's milk in our schools way back when if you want, but the problem is far more serious than that, I think. With all the faddy and medically unproven diets such as Atkins being bandied about, how many parents are foisting those diets on thier children without any idea of the effects? I will not be at all suprised if medical disorders developed by bad diets in childhood are going to become as much of a problem for the health services as smoking related illnesses are now.

    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    1. Re:It's not just the USA by pmz · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Putting a child on a fad diet is asking for disaster. The only reason adults can tolerate such things is that our brain is more or less done growing, as is our bodies.

      Kids need whole foods in adequate but not excessive amounts, more than anything. If only seafood didn't have so much pollution in it, tuna would be awesome brain food for a toddler. Peanuts aren't a bad second choice, though. Whole wheat bread has minerals what white bread doesn't. And so forth. I wonder how many kids are growing up brain-damaged, because of 10% fruit juice, white bread, french fries, etc. Goddamn stupid parents (and shifty advertisers...).

    2. Re:It's not just the USA by vrai · · Score: 1
      Advertisers have targeted children for years, yet most of the people I know had parents who had some inkling about raising a child.

      Food made from basic ingredients (fresh meat, fresh veg, brown rice etc ...), as little refined sugar as possible (raisins instead of M&Ms), no caffiene (why people give kids stimulant packed drinks is beyond me) and at least two hours a day away from the TV/computer doing some exercise (footy, cycling, anything outside).

      This isn't rocket science but sadly fewer and fewer parents manage to do this, instead allow television to raise their kids for them.

    3. Re:It's not just the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      putting your kids on the atkins diet as a BAD idea... some parents are just stupid I guess.

    4. Re:It's not just the USA by pmz · · Score: 1

      why people give kids stimulant packed drinks is beyond me

      Maybe stuffing kids with caffeine, refined sugar, and low-attention-span TV and games and, then, doping them up on ritalin and subjecting them to perverse therapy with child psychologists is entertaining to them, somehow. It's probably more likely the parents are extremely selfish and don't want to expend real effort raising their children, since half of them get divorced, anyway.

    5. Re:It's not just the USA by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

      why people give kids stimulant packed drinks is beyond me

      The thing being ignored is that kids want these things. They want sugar (yes, my kids want to eat straight sugar, and my daughter will eat butter straight), they want ice cream, they want sodas, and they want TV and video games. It's an eternal battle for a parent to get them to eat the healthy dinner, rather than nibble at it and then ask for a junk food snack later, especially since they generally dislike most spices and thus have a limited set of healthy food they will it. It's a constant battle to keep them from watching junk on TV, and unlike adults they're willing to watch the same thing over and over -- and if not, Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon are available 24 hours a day.

      Add to that the schools are all pressured to get high test scores, so kids now get homework starting in kindergarten. All the neighbor's kids are just as busy, so the only way to get the kids exercising is via organized activities, which means 20 minutes or more of drive time.

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  10. 9 in 1 million? by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Reading the artical to the end I discovered the worry is because 9 out of every 1 million babies (mostly black) babies have problems due to lack of vitamin D. This isn't all that significant. Not saying that people shouldn't get more vitamin D, but it looks more like some people need to make sure they get enough. (Dark skinned people don't make as much vitamin D)

  11. Screw the multivitamin by Dr.Enormous · · Score: 1

    If you eat anything even approaching a reasonable diet, you don't need vitamin tablets (barring things like anemia). In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if people let themselves or their children eat crappier diets because they're "making up for it" with a pill.

    (and yes, I do survive on chips and McD's $1 cheese sticks. Bite me)

    1. Re:Screw the multivitamin by Scarblac · · Score: 1

      Most people will get the official minimum required intake of most vitamins in their diets, yes.

      However, there is evidence that larger doses have benefits (preventing cancers, that sort of thing). And extra vitamins don't do any harm. See it as a bit of insurance.

      --
      I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
    2. Re:Screw the multivitamin by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 1

      And extra vitamins don't do any harm.

      Not true. Enough Vitamin A will turn your skin orange.

      Whether you consider that "harm", I suppose, is another matter entirely.

    3. Re:Screw the multivitamin by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Enough Vitamin A will kill you.

      Polar animals store massive amounts of Vitamin A in their livers, for some reason. Scott, when exloring the Antarctic, actually died of a Vitamin A overdose from eating the livers of his huskies, rather than dying of lead poisoning (as previously believed). Not strictly relevant, I know, but if you're ever in a survival situation in the Antarctic, you might be glad I told you.

    4. Re:Screw the multivitamin by Pinchy · · Score: 1

      If you eat anything even approaching a reasonable diet, you don't need vitamin tablets

      Except that there is evidence that our food supply is so degraded that its nutritional value is a lot less than it should be. So even eating a well balanced diet may not give you enough nutrients.

      In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if people let themselves or their children eat crappier diets because they're "making up for it" with a pill.

      From my experience, if these people aren't willing to spend the time and money on their diet, they also aren't willing to spend the extra money on vitamins and minerals. I find that most of the people I know who take vitamin/mineral supplements are those who also have good diets and exercise in the first place.

      Support organic farming.

    5. Re:Screw the multivitamin by sbryant · · Score: 1

      And extra vitamins don't do any harm. See it as a bit of insurance.

      Multivitamins != solution

      Let me assure you: extra vitamins can be quite harmful. Ever heard of free radicals?

      It's not so much that extra vitamins are harmful. It's that taking them separated from their natural environment is bad for you - you need other elements to be able to process the vitamins properly.

      Best course of action: plenty of fresh fruits and vegetables.

      -- Steve

    6. Re:Screw the multivitamin by p4k · · Score: 1

      IIRC it's vitamin D that polar animals store, the reason being that they can't photosynthesise more during the long polar winter.

    7. Re:Screw the multivitamin by John+Meacham · · Score: 1

      Ack! too many vitamins can easily kill you.

      Iron poisioning is one of the leading causes of death in children from too many vitamins.

      pretty much any of the fat soluable ones can build up to toxicity over time..

      so don't chug those pills. take one a day, like it says on the bottle.

      --
      http://notanumber.net/
    8. Re:Screw the multivitamin by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if people let themselves or their children eat crappier diets because they're "making up for it" with a pill.

      Unfortunately, that's my girlfriend's philosophy. Fibre supplements, protien supplements, multi-vitamin all in place of food. Why? Because, things with the right amounts have "too many calories". Sigh

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  12. Good thing that I drink Slim Fast... by kabocox · · Score: 1

    Good thing that I use the Equate version of Slim Fast. I drink 2 for breakfast and 1 for lunch... I omit the 30 min. of exercise though. Each can has about a third of all needed vitmains and minerals. Of course, I always wonder how much of those go down the toliet. Well, I mainly stick to it because it is cheaper and "healthier" than anything else I could pick for myself to eat for lunch. It's either that or McDonalds... Hey, I do spoil myself every now and then.

    1. Re:Good thing that I drink Slim Fast... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I haven't checked up on slim fast, but I'm betting it's one of the diet drinks with little fat and lots of sugar. A lot of people don't understand that it's not the amount of fat you eat that makes you fatter, but the energy (kilojoules/calories). Fat can be bad, but as long as you aren't eating fried food all the time levels should be just fine. I could be wrong about slimfast, but I've never seen a pack of it, let alone read the dietary info. (btw. another swindle is that 1 calorie is 1000 Calories. Note the uppercase C)

  13. This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by daviddennis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes, we should exercise more, and yes, we should eat better, but it looks like vitamin D deficiency is mainly a problem with kids because their bones are still growing and forming.

    I suppose it's a nice frame to hang a discussion of diet and exercise on, but the issue itself doesn't seem like it applies to most of us.

    Being in Southern California, and being outdoors way more than 45 minutes a week, it would appear that I'm taken care of for this problem. Pity that doesn't make me any lighter :-).

    From my viewpoint, the real problem is that exercise strikes me as a mindless waste of time and effort. I watch people in gyms mindlessly walking to nowhere or pulling stuff on machines until they sweat and ache, and to be honest it sounds like a miserable, dumb and unproductive way to spend time.

    Exercise and better diet strike me as a lot of pain for little gain. The negative effects on one's life show up immediately and the positive ones take huge amounts of time to appear. So it's all too easy to give up and say it's just not worth it.

    That explains the problem; as of yet I have not come up with anything like a solution. But perhaps this statement of the problem will give people some ideas.

    D

    1. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by lukeg · · Score: 1, Insightful

      The article discussed the impact on children, adults and seniors, maybe not explicitly, but it's all there, making the topic relevant to many.

      Exercise is not pointless. Increasing your baseline strength, coordination, endurance and flexibility will make you more likely to live independently and actively as you age. This is an excellent reason to exercise frequently

      As for exericise seeming mindless, that is a function of the particular activity.

    2. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 1

      > I watch people in gyms mindlessly walking to nowhere or pulling stuff on machines until they sweat and ache, and to be honest it sounds like a miserable, dumb and unproductive way to spend time.

      I couldn't agree more. The word BORING just shouts out at me from those places. But what do you have if you don't have your health? Do you watch TV? Read? How about buying an elliptical trainer and putting it in front of the TV? You can even read while on the ones that don't excercise the arms. This is a great solution to getting your daily excercise. 30 minutes is plenty to maintain good health. Yes decent ones are pricey, but not as costly as obesity and heart disease. Don't like low-impact elliptical? Any of those gym machines can be had in a home version. 15 minutes before work in front of the news and 15 minutes after work in front of something mentally relaxing. Miserableness and unproductiveness problems solved!

      Then there is always "play" that is also excercise. Hiking, biking, rollerblading, skiing, the list goes on. How many active hobbies like that do most people have? Not enough I'm betting. The best kind of excercise is the excercise you barely notice you're getting because you're having so much fun! Been rock climbing lately? Kayaking? These are all the kinds of things that should be filling in the gaps between the at-home daily workouts. Not only that, they get you outside and help with that Vitamin D production (to hit back on the main topic).

      Just because you hate the gym (I really hate it) doesn't mean you can't include good exercise in your life.

      Oh yeah, want a better diet that's enjoyable too? Start by cutting out ALL fast food. Read "Fast Food Nation" if you need motivation for this. It's almost guaranteed that your quality of life will instantly go up. Slower better tasting meals, almost always healthier, and by eating more slowly you get full on less food. Combine that with doubling the amount of water you drink and you're almost assured of slimming down that waistline while enjoying the process.

      Being healthy, like most of life, is so much better when you work smart at it, rather than work hard.

      --

      Operator, give me the number for 911!
    3. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by Pinchy · · Score: 1

      Exercise and better diet strike me as a lot of pain for little gain. The negative effects on one's life show up immediately and the positive ones take huge amounts of time to appear.

      I've yet to experience any negative effects from diet and exercise. The "sweat and ache" you refer to is not a negative, it is a positive. Most people get a high from working out, both physically and mentally. Most people like seeing their physical appearance improve. Most people like getting stronger. Most people like to be able to keep up with those young wipper-snappers.

      In my opinion, nutrition is way undervalued. I used to get bad heartburn and indigestion on a daily basis. After eating out at my favorite pizza parlor or fast food joint, I'd be stuck in the bathroom or gulping down pepto. I was told to raise the head of my bed and take antacid before eating. Then I finally educated myself about proper nutrition and I haven't had heartburn or needed the pepto in years.

      As far as taking "huge amounts of time", my heartburn and indigestion disappeared almost immediately after I changed my diet. Besides, proper nutrition and exercise should be a lifestyle, not a fad.

      So it's all too easy to give up and say it's just not worth it. That explains the problem; as of yet I have not come up with anything like a solution.

      In my opinion, the problem is that we are too accustomed to instant gratification, too selfish and too shortsighted to plan for the future. Sure, our bodies may be able to handle the abuse while we are young, but we will probably pay the price later on in life. I see too many people let themselves go and then expect medical science to fix them when they are broken. How much does obesity and heart disease cost us every year? Both very preventable diseases with proper diet and exercise.

      On a side note, I just returned from Paris, and I can tell you that almost every obese person I saw their was a fellow American. Even if they weren't busy making asses out of themselves as stereotypical tourists, they would stick out like a sore thumb due to their wider than average girth.

      I will agree with you though, a treadmill is boring. That is why I play basketball, ride my bike, walk my dogs. The treadmill does come in handy when the weather sucks, but I definately prefer the great outdoors. It is possible to make exercise enjoyable.

    4. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by kimeve · · Score: 1

      Diet and exercise are some of the most important things you can do for your body.

      I have to watch my diet very carefully. My stomach had become extremely touchy, and I find it hard to eat any kind of greasy or sweet foods that American cuisine is so laden with. Although it's been hard and I still sometimes have cravings for these kinds of foods, I keep consumption to a minimum...it doesn't hurt that I still feel sick to my stomach after eating a candy bar or pizza.

      Anyways, my point is that as hard as it may be to make a lifestyle change--especially in diet--eventually cravings subside and you can't believe what gross stuff you used to eat.

      Exercise is the same way--after you do it for a while you can't imagine how you got by before. Sure, it may be "boring", but I tend to view it as more of a meditative thing--something I get to do that doesn't require me to think. It's nice to just concentrate on the physical aspect of what you're doing and let your mind relax for a change! (A portable CD player can also help relieve you from boredom and the stress of whirling thoughts.) I wish I had more time to exercise.

      People are unhealthy, by and large (and barring real disease), because they don't want to put forward the effort to become healthy. While the results may be slow in coming, they are lasting, and it's amazing how much better and energetic I feel when I eat right and exercise regularly.

      What in all the world is more important than your health?

    5. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by pipingguy · · Score: 1

      From my viewpoint, the real problem is that exercise strikes me as a mindless waste of time and effort. I watch people in gyms mindlessly walking to nowhere or pulling stuff on machines until they sweat and ache, and to be honest it sounds like a miserable, dumb and unproductive way to spend time. Exercise and better diet strike me as a lot of pain for little gain. The negative effects on one's life show up immediately and the positive ones take huge amounts of time to appear. So it's all too easy to give up and say it's just not worth it.

      Hook 'em up to power generating machines!

      The fact that you use the words, "mindless" and "gym" in the same sentence is interesting.

      Physical fitness is trendy and cool. Being seen being trendy is even cooler.

      Ride a bike, walk instead of drive, eschew that bendover-avoiding, hand-operated mechanical picker-upper gadget and you should be OK. No need to spend money at a gym.

    6. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by splattertrousers · · Score: 1

      You can get exericise machines for cheap at yard sales and through classified listings like Craigslist. People buy them and then leave them sitting around gathering dust. Maybe you'll do the same but at least you can buy the machine for 80% off to start with.

    7. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by entartete · · Score: 1

      my solution is stationary bike + book. Bring something really intellectually challenging that requires a lot of concentration to read (structure and interpretation of computer programs has been my choice lately) and start pedaling. Read something that makes your brain ache more than your muscles and you wont notice the exercise. I find it helps my concentration too, you can't get up and wander around and the repetitive action is kind of focusing like controlled breathing is for meditation. Make it a half hour to hour a day that you read one of those books you've always been meaning to read but never seem to get around to. I really look forward to it now instead of it being something i dread. I do about an hour a day, the first 20 minutes are hard but that's when I focus more on the reading and then after that it's easy, I end up not wanting to stop at the end of the hour even though i felt like i was dying at 15 minutes.

    8. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by adpowers · · Score: 1

      I used to think going to a gym was boring, but if you bring along an iPod or a friend it can become fun. Just imagine you are hanging out with your friends or listening to music, but you just happen to be lifting weights or using machines at the same time.

      If you think of it more as another event (listening to music) with some exercise thrown in, it makes it easier. I hope that makes sense.

    9. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      On a side note, I just returned from Paris, and I can tell you that almost every obese person I saw their was a fellow American. Even if they weren't busy making asses out of themselves as stereotypical tourists, they would stick out like a sore thumb due to their wider than average girth.

      Try living here for a while, those observations are burned permanently into your brain. I never realized how loud and downright huge we are until I lived outside the country and saw our best and brightest on vacation.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

    10. Re:This doesn't seem particularly nerd-relevent by velo_mike · · Score: 1

      Exercise and better diet strike me as a lot of pain for little gain. The negative effects on one's life show up immediately and the positive ones take huge amounts of time to appear. So it's all too easy to give up and say it's just not worth it.

      Except the negative ones often don't show up until it's too late to do anything when they could have been prevented by light exercise and simple diet changes.

      Two cases: My friend T is 65, 0% body fat, plays full court basketball 2-3x per week and unless he's eaten by a bear on one of his hiking trips will live independantly to be 100. Another friends's mother, otoh, is the same age, 150 - 200 lbs overweight, can walk 500 yards in 45 minutes and can't leave the house without help. How long til she gets so far gone that someone has to wipe her ass for her?

      That was a long way of saying that the negatives can take years to show up. The lack of independance is what scares me the most.

      --

      At the bottom of the endless pile of paper work which characterizes all regulation lies a gun.
      Alan Greenspan

  14. milk makes the body good. by trixillion · · Score: 1

    Another article bought and paid for by the Dairy Councel. Just my 2 cents

  15. WHAT? by Bastian · · Score: 3, Funny

    You mean I can't just cut all the bread out of my diet and get healthy eating nothing but beef and cheese? I have to eat vegetables and go for walks!?

    1. Re:WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      cut all the bread out of my diet and get healthy eating nothing but beef and cheese?

      You can do this. However, the primary side-effect is never taking a shit ever again in you life.

    2. Re:WHAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why? Who would be stupid enough to suggest that? Even the spurious atkins diet still recommends a minimum amount of vegetables to be eaten each day, and every diet recommends exercise. I know you were trying to be funny, but purpetuating stereotypes about things you obviously do not understand only serves to make it harder for those with weight issues to find balanced information on ways to get healthy.

    3. Re:WHAT? by Bastian · · Score: 1

      I do understand, and have read all about the Atkins diet. I was making fun of the multitudes of people out there who say they are on the "Atkins diet" but don't seem to have read about it, or at least haven't read the parts that recommend eating your veggies and taking a walk after dinner.

  16. It's simple by Meor · · Score: 1

    If everyone acted like did before food came from the supermarket they'd be healthy. That means exercise, drink water, don't eat sugar, eat meat, vegetables, and fruit and that's a recipie for a healthy life.

  17. stereotypes by YouHaveSnail · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The ultimate solution to this and many other health-related problems that techies suffer is a proper diet coupled with a multivitamin supplement and regular exercise. Too bad that these choices are so unpopular.

    I hereby reject the notion that poor nutrition and lack of exercise are problems that "techies" suffer any more than other groups of similar composition (age, gender, education, etc.). Not all "techies" are anti-social pasty-faced overweight Jolt-drinking pizza-gobbling couch potatoes. In fact, I don't currently know any of those.

  18. Agenda much by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

    What does marital status have to do with the level of care one gives their child?

    Not everyone can stay together. That doesn't mean they don't want to care for their children however.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Agenda much by pmz · · Score: 1


      What does marital status have to do with the level of care one gives their child?

      In many cases, it shows how committed a person is to their family. The divorced families I've seen are just fucked up in one way or another. Angry kids, hateful spouses... With a little foresight, perhaps they could have avoided the marriage in the first place by using birth control or being objective regarding their ill-founded idealism.

      Divorce is the product of a mistake. Putting the kids in the middle of that is just wrong, and if divorce is the outcome, it shows that it would have probably been better to have never had the kids in the first place.

    2. Re:Agenda much by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Despite the most well intentioned efforts it is quite simply impossible to predict the future. There is no way for example, Mrs. Patric Naughton could have predicted that her future husband would turn out to be a pedophile.

      There are many many things that one cannot forsee. Only when you are living with them on an everyday basis do they come to light.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Agenda much by pmz · · Score: 1

      Despite the most well intentioned efforts it is quite simply impossible to predict the future. There is no way for example, Mrs. Patric Naughton could have predicted that her future husband would turn out to be a pedophile.

      This is true, but people should do more to mitigate these risks. I knew my wife for years before getting married and had no qualms about getting joint accounts and joint ownerships of things. She is trustworthy and I know it. She has a good family. The odds are very very low that she will go haywire and start abusing drugs or beating neighborhood children or embezzling money.

      I think too many people play relationships and marriage as if they are some sort of game. Popular culture certainly reinforces this with trash TV shows that encourage using other people for sex and status. I have heard men say that they would never trust a woman, because that's just how women are, and they would never get married without a prenup. I think this is all really pretty sick.

    4. Re:Agenda much by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      A prenup is always wise. That being said most of what you said is true. But let me ask you, you are sure she won't go haywire or start using drugs or beating kids but how do you know she isn't sleeping with the mailman or a co-worker or whatever? I keep my AOL account because of the easy casual sex hookups it provides but one thing I have noticed when looking thru member profiles is how many people both men and women are using the internet to find extra-marital lovers. And the spouses are usually oblivious.

      That being said adultery isn't the biggest cause of divorce. Money problems are. One spouse spends too much, doesn't understand how money works....etc. Its insidious and horrible but it happens. This is why there's usually a power imbalance in most relationships. One partner usually has more common sense then the other. Its hard to put up with that kind of a lopsided relationship forever though and thats why we have such a high rate of divorce.

      You got lucky, most people don't find someone who is a non-moron.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:Agenda much by pmz · · Score: 1

      But let me ask you, you are sure she won't go haywire or start using drugs or beating kids but how do you know she isn't sleeping with the mailman or a co-worker or whatever?

      Yes, because if there is a problem developing we can at least talk about it and figure out the cause. Finding the cause creates the opportunity for figuring out the cure. The people who are on-line looking for extra-marital affairs are not only lying to their spouse but also to themselves (unless, of course, they are "swingers" or something with full consent of their spouse). They are keeping secrets whose nature is quite dark and very destructive to the fabric of their relationships.

      One spouse spends too much, doesn't understand how money works....etc.

      One underlying problem with this is that public schools fail to teach children finance and how business works, and it seems families are failing, also. There are cultural faults that reinforce, somehow, that ignorance is bliss, which is very unfortunate. In my opinion, finance should displace the full semester of state history, at least, in junior high school (memorizing counties and rivers is pretty damn useless) to make two half-semester classes--one finance, and one the remaining useful state history.

  19. Self-Esteem? by ZerroDefex · · Score: 1

    How is that supposed to increase your self-esteem really? If you already like yourself the way you are then it's not much of an incentive. And as for quality of life, I'm happy with mine the way it is. It should not be hard to understand that different people have different values when it comes to such things.

    1. Re:Self-Esteem? by Beatbyte · · Score: 1

      Speaking from experience, when you start losing weight and getting compliments from the opposite sex, it tends to make you feel good, more confident, etc.

      Genuine compliments make anyone feel good. no?

  20. I remember Vitamin A, also. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 1

    I remember Vitamin A, also. It may be both.

  21. I hate raisins by Merk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I hate it when people talk about raising kids, saying things like "Just substitute raisins for M&Ms and stuff like that".

    First of all, did you know that dentists have found that the sugar levels in apples have been raised so high that apples are now rotting kids' teeth? Just because something is presumably "natural" doesn't mean it is necessarily good for you anymore.

    Secondly, kids above 6 or 7 know that candy is bad for them, and that is one of the reasons they want it. I remember sneaking off school property to get to a corner store and buy some candy when I was a kid. Kids aren't so dumb that they'll believe that sweet fruit is the same sort of a treat as chocolate.

    Thirdly, people have different tastes. I hate raisins, and don't like most berries, but I love chocolate, even the unsweetened bitter stuff. You're not giving the kids enough credit if you think that they'll blindly eat anything sweet.

    As for basic ingredients, it's not always that easy. Many kids (as well as adults) have food allergies. Aside from that, there's the matter of what is healthy. Apparently fat in fish is a good thing, but fatty red meat is bad. Now both of these are probably much better than a McBurger, but it's not like it's completely obvious how to make a very healthy yet still appetizing and digestible meal.

    As for the exercise, I agree that's important for everybody, but the more my parents pushed me to "get some exercise" the more I resisted. I think the reason is that: 1) they set a bad example, never exercising themselves, and 2) they would never explain why, they'd just order me to "go play outside". Playing outside also generally require someone to play with, whereas TV/computer/nintendo, whatever doesn't.

    Raising a kid is hard, and not everybody is cut out to do it. Sure, a lot of parents can do better than they're doing, but it's not like the whole process is simple, and treating your kids as objects doesn't help.

  22. There goes the Atkins-bashing again. by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    With all the faddy and medically unproven diets such as Atkins

    The 'faddy' and unproven LOW-FAT diets, pushed by quacks like Ornish and McDougal, are a principal cause of obesity worldwide. I have personally lost over 100 lbs on a low-carb, high-fat diet (similar to Atkins), which had the side effects of improving my blood lipids, lowering my blood pressure, eliminating several of the problems caused by previously uncontrolled blood sugar levels, and in general, greatly increasing my overhealth health.

    The best part is that I'm not hungry all the goddamned time, like I was on low-fat, so I'm not having any trouble keeping it off these past four years.

    Fortunately, despite the hue and cry of the low-fat superstition supporters, research is coming out showing that low-carb (high FAT) diets are a healthy and effective way to lose excess bodyfat and maintain a healthy weight. There is no such evidence supporting low-fat diets (Ornish did manage to prove that exercise was so good for you that it even reverses some of the damage done by his diet, but that's about it). There are several "studies" which show health improvements, but without exception, the health improvements are associated with a reduction in sugar and/or glycemic load of the diet -- although the low-fat idiots don't see the correlation.

    As for 'depriving' children of cow's milk, there's another thing that has never been medically shown to be worth anything, and has been implicated in a number of diseases and dietary intolerances. Cow's milk might be ok for baby cows, but it has a nutritional profile substantially different from human milk, and there is no reason to expect it to be good for humans of any age.

    1. Re:There goes the Atkins-bashing again. by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It's interesting to note that much of what you see in the Atkins diet is now getting more respect, and nutritionists are starting (just starting) to question the validity of the much-vaunted "Food Pyramid." In more educated circles, the high-carb/low-fat pyramid is being questioned for its role in the current obesity epidemic in the US. Arguably, we are eating (as a nation) more low-fat products than ever before, but also far more low-deitary fiber carbs. We've also ignored the glycemic index, which is a crucial component of how quickly a given carbohydrate is processed by the body into a given blood sugar level.

      Oddly enough, we love our processed foods, and don't seem to have any interest in oatmeal, fresh vegatables, and other low glycemic index foods. We also seem to have the massive fear of red meats, eggs, and other "instant heart attack" foods that were blamed for all manner of heart problems.

      Instead of blindly bashing Atkins (which has demonstrated remarkable staying power over the last 10 years, and therefore hardly qualifies as a "fad diet" anymore), people would do well to do some serious research about nutrition, from people who don't have a specific product to sell.

      Of course, that requires using your brain...

      Tim

    2. Re:There goes the Atkins-bashing again. by CharterTerminal · · Score: 1

      Cow's milk [...] has a nutritional profile substantially different from human milk, and there is no reason to expect it to be good for humans of any age.

      Good point! I happened to read your post just as I was halfway through a Cobb salad of lettuce topped with grated cheese, bits of deli meat, some hard-boiled egg, and tomato slices. Upon closer examination, I realized that ALL of these items have a nutritional profile which is substantially different from human milk. Therefore, there is no reason why I should expect any of it to be good for humans of any age.

      I threw the salad right away, and I am now scouring the web for a reliable source of human milk. (Being female, I suppose I could arrange to manufacture my own, but I'm not in the mood to get pregnant just now.)

      Hopefully I will be able to find a source that provides fast, local delivery of fresh human milk. I'm really getting hungry, and I'm afraid all I have in the kitchen is fruits, vegetables, bread, a chunk of Colby Jack cheese, and half a dozen eggs. I thought that it was okay to eat such things, but you're right - clearly, people were designed to consume people milk. Nothing more, nothing less.

      Thank you for showing me the error of my ways!

  23. Life without bread by hlh_nospam · · Score: 1

    In all seriousness, cutting all the bread out of your diet is a good place to start for health improvement. Beef is ok, but not as your sole source of nutrition. Cheese is problematic, but not because of the fat.

    About a week after I eliminated bread from my diet (over 4 years ago now), my hands quit hurting all the time, and the pain has never come back. (See Life Without Bread by Dr. Lutz)

    Eliminating bread, potatoes, and sugar from my diet has tremendously boosted my health -- and made it a lot more fun to exercise!

    And yes, (fresh, raw) veggies are good for you, and exersize is so good for you that it can even reverse some of the damage done by a high-carb (aka low-fat) diet (which is all that quack Ornish ever actually proved with his 'research').

    1. Re:Life without bread by Bastian · · Score: 1

      Granted, but I gotta say that low-fat does NOT mean high-carb. I've been a vegan for quite a while now, and I've experienced similar improvements in my health - I don't get headaches anymore and I don't feel the need to take a nap during the day, where I used to need at least a 30 minute siesta after I got off work.

      And my diet is not particularly high-carb. I got curious about that a few months ago, did some calorie-counting, and discovered that most days my intake was somewhere around 1,500. (2,500 on indulgent days, but if I didn't get pasta every week or so my soul would probably leave me for another body.)

      Granted, I wouldn't recommend a vegan diet to most people. You have to love cooking and be able to cook creatively, or you'll never get much in the way of stuff like essential amino acids and vitamin B12.

  24. Personal experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A few years ago, I went on a trip to Paris with a bunch of American games journalists. We went for dinner at a top Paris restaurant. To this day, I still cannot believe my ears when the American contingent, to a man, asked for cheeseburgers. To say there's a gap between European & American expectations of what good food is, is an understatement.

  25. Sunlight UV Exposure by moishevd · · Score: 0

    "Ultraviolet (UV) rays from sunlight trigger vitamin D synthesis in the skin" www.cc.nih.gov/ccc/supplements/vitd.html#sun

  26. Take your D by azav · · Score: 1

    Vitamin D is one of the cheapest vitamins to purchase.

    I take 400 Mg in the day and 400 at night.

    Lots of the new respected doctors recommend it and from what I heard on NPR is that you can't overdose on it. You body will only use what it needs. Of course, you should do your own research on this to verify.

    But a month's worth of D capsules are about 6 bucks. It's kinda hard to go wrong at that price.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...