Microsoft's new CLI
An anonymous reader writes "Months ago a story ran regarding a job advert at Microsoft for a developer role to lead the work on a new generation of command line interface.
It has now been disclosed at the PDC and its name is MSH (Microsoft SHell), codenamed MONAD.
Here is the best description so far."
named GONAD ?
Ranks right along SHT as a crappy acronym. The first thing I would think of when seeing MSH is MicroSoft Hell, not Microsoft Shell...
Daniel
Carpe Diem
Well they're close... just one letter away from "Gonad"...
=Smidge=
I saw MSH and immediatly thought MS Hell, not MS Shell.
Perhaps it should be MSSH?
And I'm not bashing either.
====
Crudely Drawn Games
Along with MONAD, Microsoft is also developing MENIS, the Microsoft Enhanced Networking Interface Solution. MENIS and MONAD products will be tightly integrated.
Apple will surley make something for 10.4, called iSHELL, complete with anti-alaised fonts, tabbed shells, alpha blending, PRESS F9 and see all your shells at once, and of course support for throbbing Aqua buttons.
Screenshot of My G5 desktop!
Whats with these names lately? It seems like MS is dropping u's left and right. First the drop the u out of WinFX and now MSH.
In Republican America phones tap you.
A new command line for Windows will be great for anybody that wants to do a bit of scripting on Windows.
Yes, it always felt "wrong" somehow to use a real, proven scripting language like Python on Windows. I guess I was just waiting for some new language that was designed by the whizkids at redmond, by microsofties, for microsofties.
Perhaps now I can rewrite some of those 2000-line BAT and CMD files in another scripting language that runs *native* on windows. Accept no substitutes, only the microsofties know what is *really* good for us.
C:\> winword.exe
.___
// \
||@@|
|| ||
|\_||
\__/
_||_
It looks like you're trying to run a program. Would you like me to start WINWORD.EXE? [Y/N]
"What if Longhorn does indeed provide more security, not only in default settings, but more inherently in the OpenSource?"
Then we'll finally know that Duke Nukem Forever is about to go gold.
SCO still have developers?
GONAD object network architecture doohicky.
"Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
I don't think a ritual sacrifice counts as lending.
"Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
There's no good reason your mailserver or each machine in your SQL Server farm needs a GUI.
No kidding...that's why we don't use Windows.
Hey, maybe that's why the USPTO's seal looks an awful lot like the elder gods'...
"Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
--Dr.W.Edwards Deming
Is this a Halloween story?
That's a bit of a recurive comment isn't it, what with the glob/regexp "*sh" including "msh" and all? But I suppose it'll go on to pick itself up by its own bootlaces, invent the monopole magnet, debug the rest of Windows and couple of other impossible things before heading off to Milliway's for breakfast.
UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
a real, proven scripting language like Python
Sir, I believe you have misspelled 'Perl'.
I couldn't even get through the headline without busting a gut. What were those marketers thinking? Are they NUTS?
And the shell, Welcome to MS Hell. I'm already there, baby.
--Somewhere there is a village missing an idiot.
Joe Sixpack wants smart software to make him look smart
Joe Sixpack is an MCSE
"Some things have to be believed to be seen." - Ralph Hodgson
Because they might have to pay a one time license fee of $699.00.
Most people aren't thought about after they're gone. "I wonder where Rob got the plutonium" is better than most get.
I thought UNIX didn't have GONADs...
20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
> Now, if Cygwin would tweak Bash to complete the job before MS, I'd be much happier...
Er, it's already there. A transcript from a Cygwin bash session I just ran:Okay, so I didn't press enter, but I think the point is made.
Pipes come from the original Unix, which is how they made their way into DOS, which was a bad single user knockoff of Unix :P As such they are part of the Unix methodology more than part of the code (though obviously that code is part of what made Unix special when no one else had that kind of redirection) and should not be patentable.
"You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
let's imagine a typical user session:
I thought 'NONADS' would be more descriptive.
People using a "Unix" derivative OS probably should not yuck it up about naming something "NONADS".
no, no...its called Microsoft's Hell