Slashdot Mirror


Single Speaker Unit Delivers Surround Sound

Makarand writes "A one-speaker home theater system that is able to deliver surround sound has been unveiled by Nirotek America (Torrance, CA). The single speaker unit actually contains five individual speakers packed horizontally into a single case. The surround sound effect is achieved by playing some sophisticated psychoacoustic trickery on the human brain. Realistic surround sound from movies and stereo CDs can be obtained as long as listeners are at least six feet away from the speaker unit and the unit stands near the front edge of whatever surface it is placed on. The unit is priced at around $799 and USA Today has a review."

33 of 231 comments (clear)

  1. Psychoacoustic trickery? by BabyDave · · Score: 2, Funny

    /me adjusts his AFDB

  2. psychoacoustic trickery? by einer · · Score: 4, Funny

    An $800 ventriloquist?

  3. Practical Application by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is pretty cool. I can see this technology being put to good use on a handheld gaming device or even handheld pc where space is a premium and good sound only enhances the gaming experience.

    1. Re:Practical Application by GwabbaWabba · · Score: 5, Funny

      However, you'd have to have fairly long arms to work a handheld gaming device that must be a minumum of six feet away, wouldn't you?

    2. Re:Practical Application by mek2600 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that your post was in jest, but with different and smaller speakers the 6 feet distance would drop. I'm not *quite* what you'd call an expert at this sort of stuff, but that's how I understand it to work. So, for far less than $800 they could put cheaper, smaller speakers in a handheld and have a very nice product.

  4. Re:Awesome! Having two speakers really sucks! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, having 4 speakers really sucks.
    Wires trailing all around... if this does
    work and gets mass produced, it will be the
    end of those clumsy 5+1 speaker combos.

    Bring it on!

  5. Area of effect by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm not sure I believe that using electronic trickery (presumably phase differences and relative volume) can create a realistic surround-sound volume-of-space for people to sit in.

    Even 5,6,7-speaker systems struggle to produce a large coherent area where the sound "sounds natural"...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Area of effect by ergo98 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Like all simulated surround, this one likely requires you to be in a very specific sweet spot (does anyone recall the Madonna CD of some 12 years ago or so that had "surround sound" on it? To actually experience it you had to be in an absolutely precise spot).

      Having said that, it is hardly surprizing that this can be done -- we only have two ears. Our brain is determining location by phase between ears and tonal balance (sound hitting the ear from different angles, such as in front or behind, get different tonal characteristics). Presuming someone knew all of the functions involved it should be doable, at least with two speakers. I'm a little confused as to how they could manage left/right separation, though - using one speaker one would have to encourage a soundwave to hit one ear before it hits the other...

    2. Re:Area of effect by tiled_rainbows · · Score: 3, Informative

      In my amateur playing about with software synthesis etc, particularly the very cool (and free) Buzz (www.buzz2.com), I've found that the coolest stereo effects come from panning using both delay and volume differences - that is, delaying the sound in one channel and making it slightly quieter.
      Interesting effects, to varying levels of "realism", can also be acheived with stereo reverb - having, for example, the "dry" sound of an instrument dominate in the left channel, but the reverby sound dominate in the right.

  6. Serious Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Does this work for people with hearing problems in one ear? And if so, does it matter when the hearing loss started to occur? (i.e., congenital problem vs. problem that developed with age)

    I'm asking this on the off chance that someone here is working on a PhD or something and can answer this...

  7. Re:One speaker as good as 5? by 68K · · Score: 2, Informative

    Bose aren't that great. Compared to the normal hi-fi stuff you buy in non-specialist places, they're pretty good. But they're not the be-all and end-all of home theatre systems.

    And yes, I've been to one of their demos.

  8. yack.. by dcordeiro · · Score: 2, Funny

    These "head related transfer functions" take account of differences in the time at which a sound arrives at each side of the head, as well as subtle distortions caused by the shape of each ear.

    the subjects used to test this new gadget were very very ugly...

  9. Re:Interesting by natd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, funny you should mention that because I moved house a year ago and lost the use of my 5.1 system as it belonged to a flatmate. So I was back to my Phillips TV which claimed to have virtual surround. It had never been any use but in my new place, which had bare walls behind the TV and behind where I sit it is excellent - the sound is all over the place, so under the right conditions it seems to work.

    --
    Only big ligs use sigs.
  10. Gimmick by FromWithin · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's surely a gimmick? If you're using HRTFs, you don't need 5 speakers in there. We've only got two ears so you only need two speakers!

    Proper 3D sound has been around for years, the best being from Sensaura, as licensed on the Xbox and most PC sound chips.

    1. Re:Gimmick by nicsterrr · · Score: 3, Informative

      It's not a gimmick at all. It's actually a product based on years of signal processing research.

      With regards to how many speakers are needed, the more speakers used, the more control one has in forming the acoustic wave field via signal processing techniques.

      It all boils down to error minimisation techniques - given a desired sound field and a set of acoustique sources, minmise the difference between the desired field and the combined field output by the acoustique sources.

    2. Re:Gimmick by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Proper 3D sound has been around for years, the best being from Sensaura, as licensed on the Xbox and most PC sound chips.

      this is a very lame hack compared to the real thing.

      Carver Sonic Holography. you could buy one in 1985 and makes all the "3D" systems out there today sound like a complete joke.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  11. Re:Interesting by natd · · Score: 2, Interesting

    'all over the place' as in the intro to Saving Private Ryan...it's all over the place! The positioning isn't as discrete as a proper system, but I like the sound of it - it's a good effort on a 6 year old TV which I had no expectation would actually work (from that perspective). If I think a sound came from the back of the room and I didn't pay for a speaker there, I'm happy :)

    --
    Only big ligs use sigs.
  12. Invasion of the carnies? by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 2, Redundant

    First we see motorized unicycles... now we are seeing single-speaker units that deliver surround sound. What is next in this circus show of singularity?!

  13. Every person has different HRTF by Prune · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Head Related Transfer Function is, well, head related -- it depends on the shape of your head. The problem with this approach is that you are limited in having to use an approximate average. While left-right imaging can be still excellent, front-back imaging usually is below par of a discrete system. The effect is more realistic with the specific HRTF of the listener, but obviously that's not practical.

    As an aside, you can check out this interesting (if dated) stereo dipole demo with only two speakers right in front of you that have minimal separation between them but can produce the illusion of extreme left-right (make sure to set up according to the readme first or it won't work).

    --
    "Politicians and diapers must be changed often, and for the same reason."
    1. Re:Every person has different HRTF by jelle · · Score: 2, Funny


      Yeah, and while it does that, in the slightly darkened room, a laser draws a grid all across your face and around your head as if to take detailed measurements, while the camera makes a 360 around you.

      Some beeps in the background, and then in true hollywood fashion a very beautiful woman in laboratory clothes steps forward to do something with a little flashlight in your ear that looks remotely medical of nature. She then proceeds to inform you that the calibration procedure was successful.

      You get up, and greet the group of 6 or so people in custom black suits standing across the room, who had been watching the whole procedure with respect. Now they are nodding their heads and smiling, obviously happy that the procedure went well. With a very big smile on your face, you crack some quick jokes while you shake the hands of each of them as you leave the room to continue with your quests to save the world and conquer the heart of that sweet and pretty girl that fights as if she learned it from Jackie Chan himself, including a considerable amount of thematrix and charliesangels special effects.

      You're the MAN.

      Yeah!

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
  14. Real Home Audio Improvements by goofy183 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I just wish some of the simpler features on pro audio equipment would work it's way down to consumer level stuff. Companies have no real incentive to clean up the sound since they can sell snake oil fixes for audio quality problems *cough*monster cable*cough*. Simply using balanced audio connections on all pre-amp connections would reduce a lot of noise coming from the usual mess of cables behind most peoples home theater systems. Moving the power supplies for the components away from any audio proccessing circutry and shielding them, Further reducing noise. Many suround sound systems would also benifit GREATLY from a simple user adjustable delay on each channel to help compensate for an odd speaker placement. Home and car audio has to be the biggest snake oil industry today. I know I'm glad I've worked with pro level equipment running concerts and such. Really opens your eyes to what needs to be there for a good clear sound.

    1. Re:Real Home Audio Improvements by ThisIsFred · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Companies have no real incentive to clean up the sound since they can sell snake oil fixes for audio quality problems *cough*monster cable*cough*

      Yeah, and what's sad is a lot of audio rags promoted these snake oil products, claiming there was a noticeable difference. I once did a comparison between using a thick cable, a thin cable and UTP cable (!) to my speakers, and I found no difference. Perhaps there was a small difference in sound quality, but I couldn't hear it, and Joe Sixpack probably wouldn't notice either. Probably because, like many people, I was using relatively low power, a mediocre amp and mediocre speakers. I cancelled my subscription to some audiophile magazine when they tried to pull the same crap with [fiber]optical connections, claiming that a bad cable would "reduce the dynamic range of your sound". While I can understand the problems caused by a bad digital link-up, I think I would describe it as "abrupt end of data stream and therefore a lack of sound." A bad optical connection would immediately be obvious.

      Many suround sound systems would also benifit GREATLY from a simple user adjustable delay on each channel to help compensate for an odd speaker placement

      Many mid- to high-end AC3 and DTS decoders already do allow you to adjust the delay on each channel. Not many people ask for this feature in low-end home theater set-ups, because they have no idea what it's supposed to sound like. Joe Sixpack doesn't know or care about seating position or speaker placement.

      I know I'm glad I've worked with pro level equipment running concerts and such. Really opens your eyes to what needs to be there for a good clear sound.

      I think that they majority of low- and mid-end home theater set-ups would get an immediate benefit from improved speaker design, probably more immediately noticeable than with balanced signal cables (although that would certainly be nice). Most of the speakers I've heard are built like this:

      With "reflex" ports to increase low-end efficiency and "flatten" out the peak a little.

      With mismatched mid-range and tweeters (with regard to efficiency).

      Thin platic enclosures, or fiberboard lacking the appropriate amount of internal support.

      Bass reflex ports are a way to flatten the response curve and extend the low end (just putting it out there; I'm sure you know all this already), but most cheap speakers aren't designed correctly (or can't be due to the size of the speaker), and the resulting sound is boomy and annoying. I guess it's just cheaper to use as little material as possible in the cabinet, then glue a tube to it.

      A lot of speaker manufacturers seem to purposely mismatch higher-efficiency tweeters (or midrange drivers) with the other drivers in the cabinet. Due to the limiting factor of size, they'll never get it exact, since woofers need so much precious real estate (and air volume). But manufacturers aren't even trying to get close. The recent popularity of horn-loaded drivers makes the situation worse. Even though the resulting sound is not so great, it raises the average peak efficiency of the speaker system, and it makes for a nice number to print on a color brochure.

      Many low-end home theater speakers are made of relatively thin plastic with no internal support. The surface area of the cabinet is probably radiating sound more efficiently than the drivers attached to it. Too bad the cabinet isn't designed to accurately reproduce this sound. It's big bucks before we get into enclosures with internal support or better materials.

      ***

      Sellers need comparable figures to sell against their competition. Unfortunately, power output is the easiest one for consumers to understand. Some consumers have become mindful of speaker efficiency as well, but not too many really understand that the efficiency varies between drivers and depends on the frequency of the sound being reproduced, and they don't understand that the quoted figures for efficiency ar

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
  15. Binaural recordings anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm surprised no one ever seems to mention the binarual method of recording and playback when it comes to surround sound.

    The main techniques used by humans to locate the direction of sound are: the volume of the sound, the phase difference between the sound hitting each ear at slighlty different times and the effect that the head, ears, body have on altering the frequency makeup of the sound.

    The way to recreate this is to use a dummy head with miniature microphones placed in each ear of the dummy to record whatever sounds you want and then to play that recording back over headphones.

    The dummy head recreates all the subtle phase and frequency effects that a real human head would in the real environment and the headphones allow that recording to be delivered to each ear free of the distorting effects that loudspeakers are prone to have(room effects, cross channel problems, phase problems etc).

    Checkout http://www.binaural.com/ for MP3 samples of this technique.

    The realism of binaural is simply staggering when used with the right headphones. No multi-channel surround sound that I have ever heard comes anywhere near close. It is so realistic that it can have you looking around to locate the source of the sound to make sure it wasn't really something in your immediate environment. The problem is that most people don't want to wear headphones when watching movies I suppose.

  16. It doesn't work, and it's too expensive by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I'm not sure I believe that using electronic trickery (presumably phase differences and relative volume) can create a realistic surround-sound volume-of-space for people to sit in.

    It can't. I've heard this kind of technology, and sometimes it works, more often it doesn't...and even when it does, the sound just "feels" "weird" but has no direction. Any directional effect is usually quite weak.

    If I understand it correctly, it's based off the way sounds are affected by the shape of your ear- but if you've ever noticed, people have differently shaped ears and I imagine their brains become 'calibrated' to their ears...

    Further, it's stupid in this price point. Nice idea, but considering for HALF the price you can get a really nice sounding, REAL system from someone decently respectable like Cambridge Soundworks...I fail to see the point. Usually this kind of technology is provided by laptop manufacturers or cheap A/V equipment makers. Not $800 speakers.

  17. Glengarry Glen Ross by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I sampled scenes from several DVDs: Toy Story, Men In Black II, Glengarry Glen Ross and The Lord of the Rings:The Fellowship of the Ring.

    Ahh yes, GGR... a cacaphony of surround sound! (?)

    If I didn't know better, I'd think the physical and verbal explosions ... were emerging from the six speakers, including subwoofer

    Umm, voices of main characters shown on the screen are supposed to come from the center channel in almost all cases. They shouldn't sound like they are "emerging from the six speakers."

    It really sounds like this guy is not qualified to review a surround sound package?

    --
    Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
  18. Only two ears but the point you're missing is... by mrjb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...the size of the 'sweet spot'. In a regular 2 channel stereo recording, the only place where the recording sounds 'right' is in the middle. If you move to one side, the perceived middle of the stereo image moves as well. These speakers attempt to solve this by reconstructing the wave front of the original sound wave, so that it corresponds as much as possible with the original. In plain language, kinda like the difference between a regular stereo image and a hologram which can be viewed from different angles. Of course, using a regular stereo recording will *still* not give 'holographic' sound, so for now the manufacterers settled for attempts to increase the size of the sweet spot. And yes, the bose speakers that bounce sound off the walls are based on the same principle.

    --
    Visit http://ringbreak.dnd.utwente.nl/~mrjb/growingbettersoftware to download your free copy of the book
  19. But... by tsa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've read the review but I'm wondering. Sometimes I watch a movie together with friends. They are usually spread around the room hanging on different chairs and the couch. Will the surround sound experience be equally good for all of them, or is the person sitting directly in front of the set (far) better off than the rest?

    --

    -- Cheers!

  20. To clear a few things up.... by ewhenn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, to everyone who says "why would I want 5 speaker cabinets all over the place instead of one?". Simple, sound is largely effected by the shape of the room, not to mention what is contained in the room. With 5 drivers in one box the surround is simulated, bouncing the sound off the walls with different timings to simulate surround sound. Slight problem though, every room is not shaped the same so this box will only be optimally effective in a room with the dimensions it was designed for. In a real surround system you can make adjustments for the shape of the room. Try doing that with this box. Second, this is actually a 1 speaker system, 2 if you count the sub. The one speaker contains 5 drivers. Before you flame the poster, check the terminology. A speaker consists of all the drivers and the physical box. Third, If you really want to do yourself justice before you talk about how great a box like this is/would be. Take a visit to a local high-end audio shop. Compare a true surround system from say, B&W, driven by some nice amps through a good processor to this all-in-one box. The all-in-one wont sound so great anymore. In fact neither will that circuit-city bose crap. In short, as with most things you get what you pay for.

  21. RTFA by Phrogz · · Score: 2, Informative
    Like all simulated surround, this one likely requires you to be in a very specific sweet spot [...]

    RTFA. I quote:

    The signal manipulations require 600 million calculations per second. Nirotek also claims its system does not require the listener to be directly in front of the speaker to be effective.

    No sweet spot. It likely is doing signal manipulation to mimic the accoustic modification your ear makes as sound comes in from various locations, rather than just phase differences.

  22. True Surround Sound by KD5MDI · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you want to see a true "single point source" surround sound system. Check out Pioneer's Digital Sound Projector. I think this may also have been featured in a /. story a few months ago.

  23. Mixed feelings by mwood · · Score: 2, Insightful

    On the one hand: cool idea, glad to see someone still thinks.

    On the other hand: would somebody please kick the marketing genius who decided to say "one-speaker" when what he really meant is "one-cabinet (with a whole lotta speakers inside)".

  24. Nakamichi by TimTheFoolMan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Did everyone fail to notice that Niro Nakamichi is behind this? Even if you haven't studied precedence and psychoacoustics, you should at least give the benefit of the doubt to a company founded by audiophiles, and that has always catered to audiophiles.

    These aren't garage mechanics that had a paper-napkin idea. This is similar to what Polk delivered with the SRS series, but is done electronically. And while it's true that everyone's head and ears are shaped differently (and therefore respond differently to psychoacoustic phenomena), most serious research has shown that only people whose heads are dimensionally way outside of the norm hear "bizzare effects." 90% (or more) of the general population will be astounded, and will have a dramatically simpler system to set up.

    Mr. Nakamichi's knowledge of psychoacoustics rivals that of EVERYONE reading /., so it would behoove you to listen to it before you dismiss it out of hand. Don't just read the articles, read about the technology and the company behind the product.

    But wait... this is /.

    Tim

  25. This is not new - Altec Lansing did it by dloflin · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have the Altec Lansing ADA-105, and it works great as a stereo speaker, and sometimes I do hear surround-sound effects - but it's not the same as a full set of speakers.