Slashdot Mirror


Windows Program Enables MP3 Downloading From iTunes

Joey Patterson writes "CNET reports that an independent software developer has released a program called MyTunes that allows people to share and download each other's MP3s on a network via iTunes." This is very much like a Mac program I saw a while back called itunesdl, which allowed one to download MP3s from friends who were sharing their playlists, exactly as MyTunes claims to do.

35 of 254 comments (clear)

  1. Misleading Headline by eaglebtc · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I would like to say that the headline for this article is sensationalized and very misleading.

    If you read Slashdot regularly, you will find an abundance of published stories that seek to push hardware and software beyond their normal limits, thereby allowing greater freedom and possibly skirting the law at the same time.

    In this case, I was led to believe that I could use MyTunes to download from computers across the Internet, when in fact it is designed strictly for those who listen to Mp3s across a LAN--like a dedicated music server, for instance. It is not intended to enable sharing of MP3s across the global internet (even though it, too, is a "network").

    Thanks Slashdot!

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:Misleading Headline by Caharin · · Score: 5, Informative

      Rendezvous Proxy will take care of this for you. Use the two products together, problem solved. Easy as cake. I have used Rendezvous Proxy and it does work.

      --
      By reading this sig, you agree to be bound by all terms and conditions I choose.
    2. Re:Misleading Headline by Spyky · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Furthermore, if you put up a Kazaa share or a Windows file share or an FTP server full of MP3s, I can grab music just as quick as my bandwidth and your bandwidth will allow. With MyTunes, at best I can grab music from your iTunes share as fast as I can listen too it.

      It would take someone 9 days to copy all of the songs out of my iTunes library. This further separates iTunes music sharing from file-sharing services.

      -Spyky

    3. Re:Misleading Headline by single_user_mode · · Score: 4, Informative

      come on! nowhere does it mention the Internet in the headline! you assumed as such and when, god forbid, you had to actually read the article to find out what the post was about it was not as you anticipated... so, should /. start dragging the rest of the story into the headline just so you will not be disappointed?

      besides its a start, i am sure others will build on it, hey maybe you could contribute! & b4 you know it, the sharing of across LAN and Internet will be possible.

      whiner!

      --
      remove NOT from email.
    4. Re:Misleading Headline by babbage · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the guy's site, this isn't exactly the case:

      The CNET story on MyTunes described it as a "stream capturer". This is wrong. MyTunes allows you to obtain the exact original file, unlike "stream capturers", which record music that's streaming and save the recorded audio to disk.

      Apparently, MyTunes grabs the actual file somehow, which may or may not involve streaming in the usual "normal speed playback" sense.

      I wonder if that means that it grabs all the ID3 tagged metadata as well. I've been trying to clean up the data in my music library, so it would be nice if this got preserved if I tried to copy some of my music from, say, my desktop to my fiancee's Windows laptop...

    5. Re:Misleading Headline by laird · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, I thought that "Windows Program Enables MP3 Downloading From iTunes" was unusually precise. It's a program for Windows that allows people to download files from iTunes shares that they can stream. Since iTunes only shares within a LAN, you can't see shares across the internet, so you can't download from them. It doesn't re-encode the files, so if they're "protected" they're still protected. So, all around, the headline was pretty accurate. Sorry you mis-read it, but you can't beat Slashdot up over that one. If it makes you feel better, there are plenty of candidates for that honor...

    6. Re:Misleading Headline by laird · · Score: 3, Informative

      iTunes doesn't really stream the music in the sense of a bit-rate limited version trickle delivered. It's more like QuickTime's auto-start download, where the full quality file is downloaded and played, only it's never written to disk. But if you capture and save the file, it's identical to the source file, in the same format, with the same DRM, etc.

      This is different from operating a streaming server, where any sound to be broadcast is squished into a single continuous audio stream, at the desired bitrate and stream format. So, for example, I can run Nicecast (great app!) and it'll take whatever sounds play on my Mac, convert it to an icecast stream at 56K bps (or whatever I tell it), and stream it out. So if I play Protected AAC's, or WAV's, or movies, etc., it all ends up in one long stream, no files, no metadata.

    7. Re:Misleading Headline by christopherfinke · · Score: 5, Informative
      Apparently, MyTunes grabs the actual file somehow, which may or may not involve streaming in the usual "normal speed playback" sense.
      I just downloaded MyTunes and tried it on the LAN in my dorm. Once you start a song in iTunes, it is added to a list in MyTunes of songs that you can copy. Choosing to copy a song takes mere seconds, and, as far as I can tell, it is a perfect copy: all ID3 data is retained, the size of the files is the same, etc.
    8. Re:Misleading Headline by jocknerd · · Score: 2, Informative

      You're mistaken. AAC is an open standard MPEG-4. The DRM is proprietary. Its called Fairplay. If you convert a CD to AAC format in iTunes, it should play on any system that supports AAC. The DRM is only put on those AAC files that are on iTMS.

  2. Won't work with music from Apple Store by da_anarchist · · Score: 5, Informative

    This will work just fine with MP3's, but won't work with Apple's DRM'ed files. For those, you need to actually authorize the computer so it can play the AAC file.

    1. Re:Won't work with music from Apple Store by mariox19 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Exactly! And the article wonders whether this will cause trouble between Apple and the music companies?! How, when the encrypted music files bought from ITMS are still as protected as they ever were?

      This is a nice program, but a dopey article.

      --

      quiquid id est, timeo puellas et oscula dantes.

    2. Re:Won't work with music from Apple Store by hype7 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      This will work just fine with MP3's, but won't work with Apple's DRM'ed files. For those, you need to actually authorize the computer so it can play the AAC file.


      that won't be enough to stop the ensuing shit storm. Last time something like this happened (iTunes 4.0 on the mac) it was discovered that you could enable music sharing over the entire internet. The RIAA jumped down Apple's throat.

      This will be no different - it's the akin to setting up shared file folders all over a network (think of a college dorm...), except that iTunes is a pretty interface. I think when the RIAA gets wind of this (won't be long now, and I *bet* that's why CNet published in the first place) they'll be down Apple's throat like pavlova down a fat lady's gullet.

      The endgame: I'm now concerned that the feature is going to get pulled. Which is a shame, because it's innovative and it's cool.

      -- james
    3. Re:Won't work with music from Apple Store by laird · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "that won't be enough to stop the ensuing shit storm. Last time something like this happened (iTunes 4.0 on the mac) it was discovered that you could enable music sharing over the entire internet. The RIAA jumped down Apple's throat."

      The problem was the sharing across the internet, which was addressed by iTunes sharing being limited (in the first upgrade to iTunes) to LAN's, after which the record companies were fine with it -- people SHOULD be able to move music freely around their home, but not copy it to strangers across the internet. Since this program is functionally identical to programs that have been out for the Mac for many months, it doesn't introduce anything dramatically new, just evens up the PC users with the Mac users. Which is to say that music can be copied across a LAN but not the internet, and music sold by iTunes can be copied but not played without authorization. It's about the same as if someone turned on file sharing, and shared their Music folder to the LAN. That being said, I'd expect Apple to do what it can to discourage the availability of MyTunes, just as they did before with the comparable Mac app's.

      It's not like Apple could prevent people from using file sharing to simply share their Music folders onto the LAN. It's not as slick a UI as iTunes, but certainly adequate.

  3. Open Source, Email communication by Caharin · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mr. Zeller,

    I recently was referred to your web page about your program MyTunes.
    Your program sounds most excellent, however I note that it is only
    available for windows. The internet community would most definitely be
    pleased if you were to make this project open source. Since you are
    charging nothing, you will only gain from this change.
    As open source software, it can be ported by other people, to mac OS X
    for example. Development would allow for greater stability, more
    features. Also, I believe sourceforge (http://sourceforge.net/) will
    host such a page for free.

    --his reply--

    Hi,

    I absolutely support open source software and have been active in the
    community (see www.zempt.com).

    The reason this version was not open source had more to do with the time it
    would have taken to choose the correct license as well as getting all the
    files together, registering for sourceforge, etc.

    I'll hopefully be able to make it open source soon.

    Best Regards,
    Bill Zeller

    --
    By reading this sig, you agree to be bound by all terms and conditions I choose.
    1. Re:Open Source, Email communication by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Informative
      a brief history as I remember it...

      Once upon a time, slashdot was entirely independent. Then they sold out to Andover.net. Andover was previously an unheard-of software company, but they had a change of focus and started buying up various computer-related websites. Then they did an IPO, and were bought out by VA Linux.

      VA Linux original business model was to sell x86 hardware with linux pre-installed on it. When they IPO'd, thanks to IPO mania and some string pulling by Credit Suise First Boston (the underwriter, which was later investigated for IPO manipulation) the stock had a one-day jump from $15 a share up to $150 a share.

      Anyhow, Slashdot and the OSDN network was bought by VA Linux. Then one of the VA employees developed sourceforge, which was originally GPLd. VA Linux decided that nobody wanted to buy overpriced commodity x86 hardware even if it did have linux on it, so they dropped the hardware division, and closed up (license-wise) sourceforge.

      Today they run a handful of OSDN sites (newsforge, sourceforge, slashdot, and a couple others) and sell/support SourceForge Enterprise Edition.

      VA Software hasn't had a quarterly profit ever, but they are, per SEC docs, reducing the quarterly losses, so they may be profitable one day. They also recently got $150 million in new financing.

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    2. Re:Open Source, Email communication by mehgul · · Score: 2, Informative

      As open source software, it can be ported by other people, to mac OS X for example.

      How about using iCommune instead ? It's been on OS X for about 1 year, IIRC.

  4. Yeah right... by AVee · · Score: 4, Funny

    From the bottom of the site:

    And remember, copyright infringement is illegal. If you have any question whether what you're doing constitutes an infringement,
    visit the RIAA's great anti-piracy website.


    Kissing asses here, scared allready or just kidding?

    1. Re:Yeah right... by dq5+studios · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sounds like sarcasm to me.

  5. Isn't it obvious? by TheSpoom · · Score: 3, Interesting

    DRM = protection of the music files.

    But the player then decodes the audio stream and then plays it through sound card.

    Most sound cards have line out.

    DRM *will not* work for audio in this way.

    --
    It's better to vote for what you want and not get it than to vote for what you don't want and get it.
    - E. Debs
    1. Re:Isn't it obvious? by YOU+LIKEWISE+FAIL+IT · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Run VMWare with either esound output if it supports it natively, or using esddsp, and you can use esdmon to tap the current esd buffers and dump them to disk. Then just run them through Lame, et voila.

      I have mixed feelings about the program in the title. It's a very cool hack, but I hope they don't take away the 'casual listening' on networks feature from iTunes under corporate pressure from folks who don't understand what an audio scraper is, because I really liked it. It really goes well with Wifi/Rendevous.

      YLFI
      --
      One god, one market, one truth, one consumer.
  6. Something's not right... by Qweezle · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This doesn't seem quite sound...this guy will get shut down. Hell, his own website contradicts him. He says this:

    Tunes is mainly meant to be used as a music manager and means of purchasing music online. However, in addition to purchasing music, one can listen to any of the music shared by others on a network. So, for example, if another person on your network has iTunes and decides to share their music, you can listen to it. iTunes does not allow you to save this music to your hard drive. MyTunes lifts this restriction by allowing you to save music from other computers to your hard drive.

    Then he says, down at the bottom, something of a "disclaimer" which, although I am not a legal specialist, does not sound like it has any legitimacy:

    If you plan on stealing music, do not download this software. If you plan on infringing upon copyrights, do not download this software. Only download this software if you plan on acting responsibly. Warranty: There is absolutely no warranty of any kind whatsoever with this software. The software is provided to you "AS-IS", and all risks and losses associated with its use are assumed by you. In no event shall the author of this software, Bill Zeller, be held accountable for any damages or losses that may occur from use or misuse of the software. Use at your own risk. And remember, copyright infringement is illegal. If you have any question whether what you're doing constitutes an infringement, visit the RIAA's great anti-piracy website.

    He also links to Apple's iTunes website, which has to have some sort of legal implications, seeing as this is a program which can (potentially) be used in malignant ways.

    It'll be interesting to see if Apple tries to do an "over-the-internet auto update" like Microsoft does with its patches, for this, or if they try to guise a fix for this as a "feature upgrade". If they do, they better have some new features. This is exactly what iTunes update to 4.0.1 did for Mac users, when it was discovered people could share music with other exact IP addresses.

  7. butt kissing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    Read that last line there. If that doesn't constitute butt-kissing, I don't know what does.

    I think you're confusing butt-kissing with nose-thumbing.

  8. I like it by PortWineBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using it this week and like it quite a bit. My company has about 8 iTunes users on my local subnet and I have been "borrowing" all week long. It isn't exactly feature rich and you must start playing a song to make it available for download. Otherwise, it's nifty!

    --

    this sig deleted by another sig

  9. What NEW does this product do by fermion · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As far as I know you can already share a folder (read only) and allow anyone on a network to copy the music and you can already stream music through iTunes to anyone on a network. The only question would be if is these things are sufficiently harder on a Windows machine to require a special program?

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
  10. You could do this before, even on windows or linux by RalphBNumbers · · Score: 4, Informative

    In addition to iTunesDL, mentioned in the article for mac, there's iSlurp which does basically the same thing in platform independent java. and has been out for six months.

    But now we have a bunch of hype and publicity.
    So the Record companies are probably going to give apple shit and force more limitations down our throats, just like when Apple had to limit iTunes to sharing on the local network only.

    Good job people.

    --
    "The worst tyrannies were the ones where a governance required its own logic on every embedded node." - Vernor Vinge
  11. 64 kbps by fupeg · · Score: 2, Informative

    All this thing does is copy the stream that is coming across Rendezvous. That stream is limited at 64 kbps. Even if you were streaming non-protected AAC files, this is a pretty power quality copy, similar to copying a CD to a tape.

  12. Re:Bad and good by Lightwarrior · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm certainly not. What constitutes sharing? Playing it for myself alone, but loud enough for the neighbors to hear? Playing it in the car when my friends are listening? Playing it for a room full of people? Playing it for an auditorium full of people?

    Is it my fault if some guy is making a recording without my knowledge?

    What if my computer gets hacked, and my legitimate digital backups are compromised? What if my backup CDs are stolen, but not my original copies? What if I still have the backups if the originals are stolen?

    Can I buy "used" CDs? What about purchasing a "mix" CD? A recording of a concert? Can I sell my "used" CDs? The copies if I destroy the originals? The digital copies if I destroy the originals?

    -lw

    --
    Mods: Disagreeing with me != my post Offtopic / Flamebait.
    World without hate or war, invaded. Tragic?
  13. The loser: Me by Therlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Great. Pretty soon Apple will disable this option and I will not be able to use iTunes simple zero-conf mp3 sharing. I loved opening my iTunes from another computer and listen to my songs. The loser: Me.

    In the meanwhile all the kiddies will keep using Kazaa to get their songs.

  14. Great Anti-Piracy Site by c_oflynn · · Score: 2, Funny

    I like when the RIAA says this:

    Plus, good luck returning a pirated tape or CD when the quality is inferior or the product is defective, as it often is.

    I think it should actually read:
    Plus, good luck returning a legal tape or CD when the CD doesn't conform to CD standards or play on your CD player, as it often is.

  15. Re:whoop dee doo by reiggin · · Score: 2, Informative
    What you suggest doesn't allow encoded or DRM files to be copied or used. This myTunes (as well as the previous Mac software, no longer available) does is record the audio stream as it is played, effectively nullifying any DRM. Nifty, but it'll be gone in a few days.

    "Say hello to Apple Legal."

  16. Should it not be called... by Slashdot+Junky · · Score: 2, Funny

    Should it not be called HisOrHerTunes instead of MyTunes? After all, if downloaded from someone else, they aren't mine as in MyTunes. Even better, the software could probably be called, WeDon'tKnowWhoLegallyObtainTheseFirstTunes.

    Later,
    -Slashdot Junky

    --
    .
    Landfill Mining Co.
    Managing the (Un)natural Resources of Tomorrow
  17. Re:You could do this before, even on windows or li by self+assembled+struc · · Score: 3, Informative

    of course, if you'd read the iSlurp page you'd see that it no longer works with anything post 4.0

    LIke 4.0.1 where Apple started doing key passing and he doesn't want to violate the DMCA.

    So, you really can't use iSlurp unless you use old copies of iTunes.

  18. Official bittorrent provided by zelphi · · Score: 2, Informative

    An official bittorrent file of MyTunes can be downloaded here:

    http://www.drunkenaardvark.com/MyTunes.exe.torrent

  19. This Time, Open Source = Termination by ablair · · Score: 2, Insightful

    MyTunes going open source is actually a bad move in this case. Hacks & a more broad functionality for MyTunes will likely be accelerated by going open source. While another app or two is required to get full-fledged Kazaa-like sharing over the internet currently, this would be quickly integrated into an open source MyTunes. OSS development would probably keep ahead of any desperate attempts by Apple engineers to restrict illegal file-sharing by iTunes users, including AAC files.

    What would be the result of this? Major labels terminating their license agreements with Apple to sell music via iTMS, certainly. iTunes subsequently waning in utility & popularity as other players catch up with iTunes while still offering secure online music purchases (these also eventually fall prey to their own myTunes if they get popular enough). Either Apple and others exit market leaving us where we started before all this, or hardware-enforced DRM (such as Palladium) gets a further boost from this obvious example of the dangers of lax DRM.

    Good job! Net result will be a worse future than present. Yeah, yeah, OSS = Good; Proprietary = Evil, etc etc. In the practical world we live in, open source may actually hurt the market & consumer choice in this case.

  20. TotalRecorder by Otto · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, that page is talking about TotalRecorder. It's available here: http://www.highcriteria.com/

    It's only $12, so it's not like he's charging a lot for it. It does have some nifty features. First, yeah, it sticks a driver in so that it can capture sound data directly. But it's got some other coolness to it, actually.

    -The 30 second auto-buffer lets you hit record after the song has started and still get the song.
    -Choose your own format, of course. But it can send the data to an encoder too (Ogg, LAME, whatever) before saving it off to disc.
    -Detection of the beginning and ends of sound being played so as to trim the silences and save into separate files automagically if you so choose (works surprisingly well).
    -Suppress system beeps and such while it's recording, so you don't get those in the resulting file.
    -Timer based recording so that you can have it record a daily radio show or something similar.

    And some other nifty stuff. It's rather well thought out, actually. It's worth the $12 if you want to convert virtually any DRMed format to something a little less protected. But it's worth the $12 not because it simply saves the stuff to disc like some free drivers might be capable of doing, but because it's a good program overall with some good effort put into it.

    Oh, it works with iTunes too. Just change QuickTime's playback settings to "Playback through TotalRecorder" and it works just fine.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.