Slashdot Mirror


Sun Announces New AMD-Based Product Line

Transfan76 writes "Today Sun Microsystems has officially announced an alliance with AMD. They "have formed an alliance to deliver a broad range of AMD Opteron[tm] processor-based systems, Sun also announced it plans to offer its Java Enterprise System on the AMD Opteron processor and is significantly extending the reach of its Solaris Operating System (OS) and leadership in the 64-bit space." You can read the official press release from Sun here. And the AMD release here." We previously reported rumored plans to this effect a few days back.

246 comments

  1. But will this really help web-focused enterprises? by Fux+the+Penguin · · Score: 2, Funny
    From Sun's press release:
    "By running the current version of the Solaris OS on the AMD Opteron processor platform, we are experiencing substantial improvements in kernel performance for Solaris over other x86-based systems, " said John Fowler, chief technology officer, software, Sun Microsystems. "With the Solaris OS running on the AMD Opteron processor, our customers and partners can take advantage of unique features such as containers delivering virtualization and high levels of security. Solaris has led the industry in proven military grade security built-in to the OS, and with Trusted Solaris OS, offering unmatched levels of privacy, second only to the Windows .NET security framework. Finally, the highly advanced Opteron processor with, it's built in ability to remove IP-infringing packets at the network layer will soon make copyright infringement lawsuits a thing of the past."

    I think it's great that Sun is finally breaking into the commodity hardware business, while still optimizing their syndicated dynamic solutions marketbase through enhanced Solaris offerings. While this may be true, they have a long way to go to true cross-media functionalities, as the AMD processor is currently unable to support XDML enhanced DSS encryption, which is required in order to implement enterprise-level mindshare paradigms. As AMD states in their press release,
    Sun's intent to collaborate with AMD to accelerate the holistic global portal platform development, to optimize and fully web-alize the dynamic performance of mission-critical e-services and increase enterprise adoption for Solaris and the Sun Java open-synergy relationship system on the AMD Opteron processor

    Sure, this all sounds good on paper, but how do they possibly intend to complete this task without relying on a steady influx of new-media, leading-edge partnerships that can emphasize one-on-one integrated infomediaries? For my money, it's just not possible.

    Don't get me wrong. I wish them all the best. But still, good luck, Sun and AMD...you're going to need it.
  2. Lends new meaning... by armyofone · · Score: 1, Funny

    .. to the term 'Solar Flare'...

    *** rimshot ***

    --
    "A revolution without dancing is... a revolution not worth having"
  3. This is great news by Pingular · · Score: 1, Interesting

    and about time! With this new competition intel has really got to get their act together. For quite a while now AMD has been providing cheaper (but not always faster) processors, however with their new AMD64 line they've really come into themselves. Well done AMD!

    --

    When anger rises, think of the consequences.
    Confucius (551 BC - 479 BC)
  4. AMD SPARC? by forgoil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I assume that AMD at this point in time has no plans for any SPARC CPUs, but I wonder how much AMD could do if they got all Sun's SPARC resources and basically bodged together a next gen SPARC from the Opteron. But something tells me that x86-64 is the way of the future if Sun don't want to slip behind more.

    1. Re:AMD SPARC? by rodgerd · · Score: 1, Funny

      Going on the performance of SPARC's design teams thus far, it'd make the Opteron run slower.

    2. Re:AMD SPARC? by nizo · · Score: 1

      Actually I think they are going to combine the two words: thus we get SPAMD :-) Seriously though, this is great news for AMD, and as long as AMD stays afloat it will help keep cpu prices down.

    3. Re:AMD SPARC? by BlowChunx · · Score: 1

      No, Fujitsu is the future of the SPARC line.

    4. Re:AMD SPARC? by October_30th · · Score: 1
      bodged together a next gen SPARC from the Opteron

      Now why would you want to spoil a perfectly good 64-bit CPU?

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    5. Re:AMD SPARC? by southpolesammy · · Score: 5, Informative

      SPARC is an open specification. Nothing's stopping them from doing it now, except perhaps ROI.

      --
      Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
    6. Re:AMD SPARC? by leerpm · · Score: 1

      I don't think he meant the architecture instructions and specifications. Most likely, the grandparent poster was refering to Sun's SPARC engineering department putting their efforts behind AMD's chip.

    7. Re:AMD SPARC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      From
      http://www.sun.com/2003-1117/feature/
      This article contains projections or other forward-looking statements regarding future products, results or financial performance of Sun Microsystems, Inc., including statements that the SUN and AMD alliance is targeting the delivery of systems with extreme performance at compelling prices; Sun's intent to add a complete portfolio of AMD Opteron microprocessor-based servers and power desktops running Solaris, Linux and Java Enterprise System to Sun's entry-level family of systems; that the alliance will allow Sun to deliver a complete line of x86 systems that scale out from 32- to 64-bits; Sun's aim to offer choice of software with the Solaris OS, Linux and Sun Java platform and to deliver optimized Solaris OS for 64-bit AMD Opteron processors; Sun's plan to work together with AMD to optimize the Solaris OS for AMD Opteron 64-bit; Sun's intent to offer AMD Opteron processor-based systems in 2004; Sun's intent to take advantage of industry economics to deliver extreme performance systems at very accessible prices; Sun's belief that it provides you with a path to 64-bit x86 applications without losing your current investment in 32-bit x86 applications; that Solaris 9 OS x86 will run native on the Solaris OS for Opteron; that Solaris OS and Linux will enable native 32- and 64-bit applications' coexistence, providing a seamless path to the future; that Sun and AMD are launching a joint ISV Adoption Program; that the Java Enterprise System will be available on the new AMD Opteron systems; that customers will get a portfolio of high-performance systems from a vendor who can provide industry-leading service and support; that the chip will allow for greater memory and hence improved application performance; Sun's belief that it systems featuring AMD Opteron processors are a great choice for customers deploying high-performance technical computing or grid computing applications; that the SPARC processor will continue to be Sun's flagship for extremely scalable Symmetric Multiprocessing; that Sun continues to invest heavily in the SPARC architecture and is leveraging the processor's inherent scalability with its Throughput Computing strategy; that Sun is ready to meet customers' needs, whether it's raw computing power, throughput, or memory access; and that Sun has a solution for you. Factors that might cause actual results to differ include risks associated with developing and marketing new products, lack of success in technological advancements, lack of acceptance of new products, adverse business conditions, failure to retain key employees, cancellation or delay of projects and in particular the cancellation or delay of the alliance with AMD, increased competition and continued adverse general economic conditions in the U.S. and internationally. These and other risks are detailed from time to time in Sun's periodic reports that are filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including Sun's annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2003 and its quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the fiscal quarter ended September 28, 2003.
    8. Re:AMD SPARC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I thought AMD didn't believe there should be any other chip than an X86 chip.

    9. Re:AMD SPARC? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Given the relatively poor results that the current engineering department seems to be acheiving with UltraSparc processors, I wouldn't hold my breath for anything at all.

      Now what would be interesting is if Sun put some of their platform development behind AMD's Opteron. While Sun's processors themselves aren't anything to write home about, they have some pretty impressive interconnect technologies. If they were to combine that with the Hypertransport links on AMD processors, they might be able to acheive some rather impressive systems.

      That being said, the money seems to be in 2 and 4 processor servers these days. The real big (> 8 processor) servers seem to be fading away somewhat and probably aren't making much money after you take into account the (rather high) development costs.

    10. Re:AMD SPARC? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I read that as "Spay-MD"...

      I doubt there would be any additional generations of that architecture.

    11. Re:AMD SPARC? by RevAaron · · Score: 1

      SPARC may be a spec, but that doesn't mean that Sun doesn't have valuable implementation-specific information that AMD could use to create a next-gen 64-bit SPARC CPU that is based on the Opteron in some way.

      I know nothing about the Opteron architecture, so I can't comment on how worthwhile that endevour would be. But for an illustration, let's pretend the Opteron is setup in a similar way as the AMD K6-2- a RISC CPU inside and a x86->AMD RISC translator between the rest of the computer and the inner-CPU. It is conceivable that AMD could create a SPARC64->AMD RISC translator or perhaps dumping the translator and modifying the inner RISC core to use the SPARC instruction set.

      Perhaps the grandparent poster should've used the proper terminology "Sun's current implementation of 64-bit SPARC," but I imagine most people got his meaning. No need to have a stick up yer ass about it.

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
    12. Re:AMD SPARC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the truth is, sun microsystems, especially their sparc engineering dept, breeds an atmosphere of mediocracy. what once was a team on the cutting edge of microprocessor devepoment (wow, over a decade ago), is now maintaining sun's sparc processor with hardly any innovation. years after years of failed and delayed processor projects, the attitude has developed that the sparc, as is, is good enough and has no real competition. this is reinforced by the 'death' of their arch-rival, the alpha. the sun people pretty much considers that they won over the alpha (reality not withstanding), and can now sit on their throne as kings of 64bit processors. when was the last time you remember a true step ahead coming from the sun-sparc camp? yeah, me neither.

      amd, on the other hand, is still a fresh team. they are coming from years of living in the super-competitive desktop processor field, where you innovate or die. they can't allow their projects to slip and they can't let their processors languish and fall behind, or someone will eat their lunch and kick their ass. amd can't rely on selling "the whole package", they only sell cpus (okay, a few other things too), and they have to deliver.

      many at sun have been saying that sparc is no longer the right solution. this has nothing to do with the sparc architecture. nobody would argue that amd64 (or itanic, for that matter) is better than the sparc from a pure design perspective. it's a quality engineering effort that has driven amd64 (despite the x86 architecture). i sincerely hope that amd does not in any way entangle itself with sun's engineers.

      why am i ac? you figure it out.

    13. Re:AMD SPARC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Luckily for Sun, most of its old competition (SGI, HP, DEC. Compaq) has killed off their competing processors and gone behind the white elephant that is itanic. No one is buying itanic. In fact, sales are so poor that they issued a press release after selling a whole 4 itanium 2 processors to one customer.

      UltraSPARC is still being developed, although it's not what it was, but with this AMD alliance, 64-bit Solaris on Opteron (and Linux) and with such poor competition from Dell, HP, etc. Sun is on to a winner.

    14. Re:AMD SPARC? by swordgeek · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sadly, I agree with you for the most part.

      If Sun can come out with a 2GHz UltraSparc IV by the end of next year, they'll at least be back in the workstation market. (2GHz USIV will approximately compare to a 6GHz P4.) As far as true innovation at Sun, there are three things which MIGHT pan out into a quantum leap like they've pulled off before.

      1) Throughput computing. Actually having a complete system (processor, RAM, I/O, video, and all busses) built together to efficiently stream data from any one end to any other might offer big advances. Possibly. Perhaps.
      2) "N-1." If Sun can actually pull off computing as a commodity (even though they vehemently claim that that's NOT what they're doing), they might appear as visionaries, yet again.
      3) Um, I can't remember the third one. Maybe just two ways out for them, then.

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
    15. Re:AMD SPARC? by neurosis101 · · Score: 1

      There's really no point. While SPARC assembly is nice, clean, and well thought out, the only advantage AMD would get is being able to run Solaris and other Assembly level code without a recompile.

    16. Re:AMD SPARC? by SpookyFish · · Score: 1

      Only?! I don't care if it's Java or C/C++ (Even GCC!), there are *always* little differences that take a lot of time to professionally port and especially TEST well.

      For commercial vendors and consumers, hardware level SPARC compatibility would be huge, in terms of both effort and marketability.

    17. Re:AMD SPARC? by doob · · Score: 1

      It is conceivable that AMD could create a SPARC64->AMD RISC translator...


      I thought that this was going to be the point of the Crusoe. I remember thinking when it was announced that it would be really cool being able to install some new microcode into the processor, reboot and have an alpha/sparc/ppc! Alas, Transmeta haven't taken that route.

      --
      In the spoon, there is no Soviet Russia!
    18. Re:AMD SPARC? by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Third could probably be software - get the ex Netscape/iPlanet/Sun ONE and now Java Enterprise System products out into the mid market, Exchange/Notes territory...

  5. Wonderful news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Air conditioning manufacturers specialising in cooling server rooms will be delighted with Sun's switch...

    1. Re:Wonderful news by rivaldufus · · Score: 1

      They've been delighted with Sun for a long time. Ever stand behind an E4500?

    2. Re:Wonderful news by sammy+baby · · Score: 3, Funny

      My wife does. Every time she gets out of the shower, in fact. Claims it works better than her hair dryer.

    3. Re:Wonderful news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Only when I do them doggie-style.

    4. Re:Wonderful news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Quite the oposit actualy.... The new 90nm Opterons scheduled to be released sometime in Q1-Q2 timeframe will draw only 40W of power, much less than ANY intel server chip (espicaly the prescot based Xeons that will draw over 100W!!!). The current Opterons run about the same as Xeons as far as heat output is concerned

    5. Re:Wonderful news by cduffy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      All I can say is that it can't be worse than what Sun's traditionally made.

      I at one point had an opportunity to come in contact with a prototype embedded Sparc chip and reference board. The thing drew *70 watts* of power. For an embedded board.

      My old university was recently (okay, it's been a few years now) donated a 64-unit sparc cluster by a national laboratory who was done with it. Last I'd heard they only had 2 units powered up -- they needed to have their (large, heavy-duty) server room refitted with more power and better A/C before they could turn on the rest.

      Honestly -- there's no way AMD could do any worse.

    6. Re:Wonderful news by pmz · · Score: 1


      "prototype"

      The UltraSPARC IIe docs say 13 watts maximum, which isn't bad for a CPU that's a couple or more years old, now.

    7. Re:Wonderful news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A US IIe!?!? So we should compare it to a Pentium MMX?

  6. Why AMD? by gpinzone · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Considering that these are JAVA based systems, why pick the processor that bent over backwards to be x86 compatible? I know, they won't be using x86 instructions, but what strategic significance is there for going with AMD vs. Intel or IBM?

    1. Re:Why AMD? by chill · · Score: 3, Interesting

      IBM is a major competitor of Sun. And since Sun has SPARC, it has all it needs in the way of non-x86 processors. It needs a good x86-compatible offering.

      Why not Intel? I think Sun & Intel are old enemies over the SPARC/x86 competition.

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    2. Re:Why AMD? by ajiva · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That doesn't even make sense! Java is a language, not an OS! Yes these systems will have Java installed on them, but so will StarOffice, GNOME and other pieces of software. The reason why Sun went with the Opteron is simple, they can present a unified software solution to the customer. Run Linux or Solaris in 64bit mode no matter how large the machine is. Whether its single cpu Opteron, or 64way SPARC box. Makes alot of sense...

    3. Re:Why AMD? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      I think it has something to do with the Itanium being a Fat slob of a pig.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    4. Re:Why AMD? by jared_hanson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Well, IBM is one of Sun's largest competitors, so it wouldn't make a whole lot of sense to jump in bed with them. There probably isn't a whole lot of reason to not choose Intel, other than the fact that Sun operates on religious principles rather than business ones.

      Sun likes to think they have the power to stick it to anyone they want. So, they are going after Intel by partnering with AMD. These practices haven't played out well for them in recent years.

      Sun stuck with UNIX in a time when everyone was getting away from it. This paid off well for them a few years back. However, they have since used the same philosophy and have been digging a big hole. They tried to ride out on Solaris and SPARC, but the shift is towards Linux and x86. This move is a step in the right direction, but it might be too late. They have Java, but while Sun has been moping around, IBM jumped on the Linux bandwagon, and took a lot of the Java momentum away from Sun.

      In short, if Sun would have played their cards right, they could be where IBM is today. Now, however, they have 2-3 years of catchup to do, and not many people are going to wait around.

      --
      -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
    5. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      >Considering that these are JAVA based systems, why
      >pick the processor that bent over backwards to be
      >x86 compatible?

      Because despite the Java branding, Sun's Java Desktop System is really an x86 Suse-based Linux distribution, complete with Gnome. (Java Enterprise System is Solaris with Gnome.)

      Of course, Java is also included, and is a key part in Sun's strategy with these systems. But the "Java Desktop..." and "Java Enterprise..." names are pure marketing.

    6. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Jesus, why would a company need all 64 bit desktops?

      Think McFly!

    7. Re:Why AMD? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1
      Java is a language, not an OS!

      I believe that in Sun's current worldview Java is a meaningless trademark to be slapped onto anything: hence Java Desktop. We should have seen the warning signs early with Javascript.
      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    8. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IMO, this is a move out of desperation on Sun's part. They've had the low end server market taken away from them by Dell/Intel. They need an x86 solution to compete in that space and AMD is the only option.

    9. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd love all 64 bit desktops here, but we do a lot of 3d modelling and design with Adobe and Macromedia products.

      Those don't really run all that well on Linux/Solaris/etc.

      We'll move to opterons on Windows sometime in 2004, when we need more than 4 GB of memory.

    10. Re:Why AMD? by drakaan · · Score: 1
      Jesus, why would a company need all 64 bit desktops?

      Doom IV?

      --
      "Murphy was an optimist" - O'Toole's commentary on Murphy's Law
    11. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sun doesn't need x86-compatibility. Sun needs good CPU for low/mid-range market and Opteron is by far best choice.

    12. Re:Why AMD? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 3, Informative

      Could be because the Opteron is one of the fastest chip in the world at executing Java code right now, and that's when running in IA-32 (aka 32-bit x86) mode?

      Check out the results for SPEC JBB2000. On a per-processor basis, AMD's Opteron chips are second only to Intel/HP Itanium2 based systems, and the Opterons are quite a bit cheaper. Actually, when combined with the new x48 Opteron chips announced alongside the Sun deal, AMD should make up most of the current 8% difference between the two chips.

      So, they get better performance than anything IBM has to offer (even the full-fledged Power4 can't match the Opteron in Java if the above test is to be believed) and a much lower price tag than what Intel is looking for. Seems like a pretty good choice if you ask me.

    13. Re:Why AMD? by PhilipPeake · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Java part is a red herring, it can be made to run on just about any platform. Also the Jave Enterprise System offerings from Sun are not written in Java - yes, they do have some Java components, but the majority of the code is C/C++. the Java labeling is just Sun marketing stupidity.

      The real reason for the choice of AMD is the 64 bit architecture of the chip. If you have been following the news about the rival AMD and Intel 64 bit offereings, you will have noticed that any somewhat unbiased observer gives the AMD chip a big edge over the Intel chip.

      Intel have problems with their 64 bit architecture, which is sowing in the low adoption rate of that device.

      AMD on the other hand, is doing very well.

      Sun chose the best architecture, and thus the best (potential) performance. The fact that it also sticks one in the eye of intel is a fortuitous by-product.

    14. Re:Why AMD? by digitania · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Yes. In my opinion that this is a last-gasp effort by Sun. Their failure to remain competitive in a market moving towards more open standards and interoperability - in other words, their priggish adherence to their outdated business model - has brought them (literally) to their knees (begging at AMD's door for a non-SPARC CPU to compete in the Linux market) in an attempt to appear to have a competitive platform. IBM's e325 (Opteron) announcement and subsequent performance had to be a revelation... What I'm going to be most interested in seeing is whether or not HPaq jumps on this bandwagon. Since HP was so integral to the Itanium design (and HPaq has really staked their entire future on Itanium) and Compaq had and sold Alpha to Intel (another subject into which I will not venture)... it's interesting, at least. I will be very surprised if they do, since they seem to be indexing everything they do these days to Dell (ask your friendly HPaq rep what their future in the 8-way Xeon space is...).

    15. Re:Why AMD? by deanj · · Score: 1
      We should have seen the warning signs early with Javascript.

      Netscape created Javascript (formerly Livescript), not Sun. There was some, er, ...interesting..., uses of trademark around then. here's what someone from Netscape had to say at the time

    16. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Their failure to remain competitive in a market moving towards more open standards and interoperability - in other words, their priggish adherence to their outdated business model.

      Oh you mean dirt cheap per-employee desktop pricing? Yeah, that's definately outdated. Oh wait, how many companies do that again?

      What I'm going to be most interested in seeing is whether or not HPaq jumps on this bandwagon

      Do you know how much HP has invested in both generations of Itanium processors?

      another subject into which I will not venture

      Because you know nothing of it I assure you.

      ask your friendly HPaq rep what their future in the 8-way Xeon space is...)

      As a friendly Dell representative what their future in the 8 way and above market is.

    17. Re:Why AMD? by Ed+Avis · · Score: 1

      Yes, Netscape made a scripting language and Sun was happy to stick a meaningless 'Java' label on it although it has nothing to do with Java. Sun agreed to let Netscape use the trademark.

      --
      -- Ed Avis ed@membled.com
    18. Re:Why AMD? by oldmanmtn · · Score: 3, Insightful
      There probably isn't a whole lot of reason to not choose Intel, other than the fact that Sun operates on religious principles rather than business ones.

      Opteron is cheaper, faster, and requires less power than Itanium. AMD's 64-bit ISA is a hell of a lot cleaner than Itanic's. And AMD appears to be making the switch to 90nm technology faster and better than Intel, which will further help their power/cooling story.

      --
      - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
    19. Re:Why AMD? by deanj · · Score: 1

      Netscape created Livescript, renamed it to Javascript. At the point, Sun stepped in. Sun has the trademark on the word Javascript now.

      Sun had nothing to do with Javascript other than that.

    20. Re:Why AMD? by ChocoboKnight · · Score: 1

      "Sun is in a unique competitive position against HP and IBM - who now find themselves lacking an operating system on either Intel or AMD Opteron, and fighting a systems war without weaponry"

      Then what is linux with 64 bit support?

    21. Re:Why AMD? by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

      Java isn't an OS, but it seeks to make the underlying operating system completely irrelevant from the standpoint of the user. Ideally you should have all the same applications and they should behave in precisely the same way on every system. Heh heh heh. Still it is not necessarily an unreachable goal, save that some applications will always need some more customization on their end to be able to behave precisely the same on every system. (Most any kind of disk utility, for example.)

      Meanwhile the goal of the operating system is to make the underlying hardware irrelevant, such that any application can be run on any other system with nothing more than a recompile. Linux and netbsd in particular have put freakish amounts of work into this, and of course, doing some things just makes it harder. Bridging the gap we find the assorted libraries that we have all come to expect to be on Unix systems to make software both easier to write and less dependent on particular flavors of Unix.

      Java above, OS below. Both seek to do more or less the same thing, just at neighboring levels. Microsoft too sees the wisdom in this, and failing to railroad Java away from Sun, buys a bunch of companies, and picks them for their best programmers while generally their product in some form, often as a Windows feature - and produces .NET in the process. An excellent idea really, and they've had lots of experience with Java in the interim to learn what does and does not work. One would assume they've been working on .NET for quite a while.

      It is not unreasonable to believe that one day we will have products simply sold in stores for .NET or Java, and actually be able to expect it to work. Generally speaking, products are guaranteed to work only on certain versions of the JRE and often only on specific operating systems - Just requiring a specific JRE generally limits the places you can expect the software to run. Things are obviously getting better all the time, no one is simply sitting on their thumbs here. But Sun realizes that unless it can sell a bunch of Java stuff, whether it's licensing or training materials or directed development, Microsoft is going to continue slowly strangling them.

      Anyway, returning to your comment, it is not clear that Linux will necessarily be on the most powerful Opteron-based systems from Sun, if they bother to develop some system which has a ridiculous number of processors. They certainly could do it, but I can easily see why they might choose not to. I think it would be a mistake, because someone will develop Linux for it anyway, and you won't be able to get the biggest piece of supporting it.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    22. Re:Why AMD? by deanj · · Score: 1
      And, BTW, I do see your point about slapping Java-whatever on things, but in Javascript's case that was more of Netscape's doing than Sun's, in order to make Livescript more popular.


      And frankly, the only thing Netscape's implementation of Java did for Sun was get the word out there about "Java". The implemenation on Netscape sucked. Javascript just confused things further.

    23. Re:Why AMD? by justins · · Score: 1
      There probably isn't a whole lot of reason to not choose Intel, other than the fact that Sun operates on religious principles rather than business ones.

      Perhaps that, but also there is the fact that Intel and Sun have a long history of not making their relationship work. One of the reasons support for Solaris x86 within Sun has varied so much over the years.
      --
      Now before I get modded down, I be to remind whoever might read this that what I am saying is FACT. - bogaboga
    24. Re:Why AMD? by WoTG · · Score: 1

      Sun won't touch Intel for much more than old SPARC/x86 competitions. Intel has bet a lot money on trying to take over the high end CPU market with it's Itanium architechture. This includes Sun's Sparc chips. So, from Sun's point of view, an enemy of my enemy is a friend of mine. And a stronger AMD is a weaker Intel. It's not that difficult a choice, especially since the Opteron is clearly competitive with any x86 stuff from Intel.

    25. Re:Why AMD? by default+luser · · Score: 1

      Let's see, they need an x86 processor because Sun is losing out in the non-x86 world. Fujitsu already can make a better UltraSparc, and IBM is constantly hounding on Sun with their Power4, just to name a couple.

      Why AMD? Two easy reasons:

      1. Intel is single-handedly responsible for the rise of inexpensive x-86 based servers. Lots of bad blood there. As for IA-64, Sun would probably give in and buy Fujitsu-made UltraSparcs before they ported to anything Intel.

      2. The AMD Opteron has flat 64-bit addressing over the Xeon, but here is the key point: AMD's on-processor memory controller, plus dual Hypertransport busses for inter-processor communication mean that Opteron sees MUCH HIGHER efficiency in multi-processor configurations versus the Xeon.

      --

      Man is the animal that laughs.
      And occasionally whores for Karma.

    26. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Doom IV?

      No, no, Duke Nukem Forever :)

    27. Re:Why AMD? by jkovach · · Score: 1

      Because Apple says so, of course!

    28. Re:Why AMD? by Get+Behind+the+Mule · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... Sun's Java Desktop System is really an x86 Suse-based Linux distribution, complete with Gnome.


      Ding! Right.

      (Java Enterprise System is Solaris with Gnome.)


      Bzzzt! Wrong.

      Java Enterprise System is the re-branding of the Sun ONE server stack -- web, application, directory, identity portal and a few more things --, with a fixed, yearly per-employee license price and a synchronized quarterly upgrade schedule.

      If I'm not mistaken, Java Desktop System will become the default desktop for Solaris as well.
    29. Re:Why AMD? by Blackhalo · · Score: 1

      http://www.pricewatch.com/menus/m3.htm

      I don't know about Itaniums, but Opterons are not cheap.

      I sure do want to build a dual Opteron box though, perhaps when the dual proc board drop below 400$.

      --
      "There is nothing to do it. But to do it." -Floyd Pepper
    30. Re:Why AMD? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are really smoking pencil shavings if you think an 8xx Series Opteron system will be any cheaper than an Itanium box.

      This ain't your momma's pricewatch special -- this is coming from Sun and will be priced in the same ballpark as HP and IBM's offerings.

    31. Re:Why AMD? by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 1

      Opterons are not cheap, Itaniums are flat-out expensive. The absolute cheapest Itanium2 chips that Intel sells (their 1GHz, 1.5MB L3 cache version) cost $744, and the top-end model running at 1.5GHz with 6MB of L3 cache tips the scales at $4225. The top-end for 4P configurations (the Opteron 848) will set you back $3,199, though it really hits a nice price-point for dual-processor setups, where the Opteron 248 costs only $913.

      Now, obviously the price of the total system is a different matter altogether, and unfortunately it's there isn't much info out yet on the price of 4P servers. I was able to get a price for a quad Opteron servers from Penguin computers, and at ~$23,000 for 4 x 846 Opterons and 8GB of memory the price was pretty comperable to an HP Integrity rx2600 server with 2 x 1.5GHz/6MB L3 Itanium2 chips and 2GB of memory (trying to keep other components to a minimum but as similar as possible, ie both had 15Krpm SCSI drives and redundant power supplies).

    32. Re:Why AMD? by pmz · · Score: 1

      I think Sun & Intel are old enemies...

      I think it's more an on-again off-again relationship. A long time ago, Sun did try out 386-based workstations, and I heard about a 486-based one that was not produced in volume. My SunPCi co-processor card has a Celeron in it. Sort of a bitter-sweet rivalry, I guess.

  7. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by chill · · Score: 1

    Slick, yet entertaining. 8 out of 10 troll points.

    "...second only to the Windows..." gave it away. Any Sun employee uttering that phrase would probably be publically executed.

    --
    Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
  8. good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by penguin7of9 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is good for AMD, giving them additional credibility and sales in the short term. But it doesn't address Sun's long-term problems: they aren't competitive in terms of hardware and they can't make money from Java.

    1. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      go zealot go!

      learn some history kid. sun's been in situations like this before and they'll get out of it again.

    2. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Zealot"? Wouldn't that be someone who blindly believes in a company, and just dismissively sweeps away criticism? Pot, kettle . . . black.

    3. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ok, tell me how I'm turing a blind eye to it? Opteron is some pretty competitive hardware and Java won't make any money but then again I don't think that was the original motivation either.

    4. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 2, Funny

      zealot: someone who bought high.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    5. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by ultrabot · · Score: 1

      But it doesn't address Sun's long-term problems: they aren't competitive in terms of hardware and they can't make money from Java.

      Well, perhaps with Opteron they might become competitive w/ hardware.

      And at least the *real* performance of Opteron is a refreshing change from the old Sun habit of relying on myth and illusion to sell their hardware. Now they reserve that role to the OS alone, we'll see how long that will last ;-).

      --
      Save your wrists today - switch to Dvorak
    6. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Kohath · · Score: 2, Funny

      So releasing new competitive hardware doesn't address "they aren't competitive in terms of hardware"?

    7. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by RevMike · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And at least the *real* performance of Opteron is a refreshing change from the old Sun habit of relying on myth and illusion to sell their hardware. Now they reserve that role to the OS alone, we'll see how long that will last ;-).

      SPARC is not a speed demon. For a long time now, lots of "commodity" CPUs have been more impressive performers, especially when one considers price/performance ratios. The benefit of Sun hardware for many years now has been in the IO subsystems. Fiber based drive arrays and the like are far more valuable for many purposes than fast chips. Database hosting, for example, relies far more on large memory for caching and fast disk subsystems than on fast processors.

      Hopefully, for Sun's sake, they'll abandon their losing CPU business and concentrate on making making hardware that supports parallelism and high speed disk arrays. It would be nice to be able to buy a box with 106 2GHz Opterons, a hundred GB of Ram, and a few TB of lightning fast disk.

    8. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by gregarine · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Sun's viable product is Solaris. If they can get people running this on x86 then Sun has a chance. I think many companies are not ready to trust their apps to Linux or BSD. I know mine isnt. I hear that Solaris on x86 isnt quite right yet though. Also major software vendors like oracle dont seem to fully support Solaris on x86. Anyway in my view Solaris is what makes Sun. Their hardware is too expensive and their Java appserver aint for shit.

      --

      I like traffic lights
    9. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by greed · · Score: 1

      Of course, all that matters if all you need is bandwidth. If latency matters, and I'm talking about file operations, Sun's going to kill you. Even Solaris on Intel is a better choice than Solaris on SPARC, but Linux on Intel leaves them both in the dust. (I was only concerned about latency, as shown by CVS I/O, so that's all I tested; maybe the bandwidth wasn't there on the SPARC either--that would really suck for Sun.)

      And yes, I'm comparing expensive fibre arrays on the Solaris SPARC to Ultra320 and UDMA133 on the Linux Intel machine.

      Make sure you spend your money where it matters, big iron isn't for every job, sometimes your better with a lot of cheap little boxes. Ask Google.

    10. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by nixman99 · · Score: 1

      I buy Sun for the reliability. I also buy a lot of Dell & HP Linux servers. But for the one-of-a-kind can't-get-by-with-a-cluster applications, nothing beats Solaris on Sparc for reliability. Our average uptime is > 15 months.

    11. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ...not when your current business model is based on 80% gross margins and you want to compete with Dell, who thrives on 10% gross margins. B-Bye Sun.

    12. Re:good for AMD, but Sun is doomed anyway by penguin7of9 · · Score: 1

      learn some history kid. sun's been in situations like this before and they'll get out of it again.

      I've been using Sun machines since their beginning. Care to explain when Sun has been in situations like this?

  9. Re:don't buy them from Sun by geoffspear · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is "face music" kind of like "chin music", or are you talking about the Swiss record company?

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  10. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "second only to .NET?" Did anyone else see this? I like the IP-infringing packets filter :)

  11. Who Knowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The Java Desktop they could create some serious revenue. Imagine a large company with Opteron workstation for engineering and scientific appilcations and SunRays as e-mail/web/StarOffice boxes.

    Sun, the company who is now renowed for their expensive systems could use "commodity" computing to bring themselves back and Linux to the desktop. Who would have thought.

    1. Re:Who Knowns by Krondor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Sun, the company who is now renowned for their expensive systems could use "commodity" computing to bring themselves back and Linux to the desktop. Who would have though

      Great plan, but there are a few points. Sun appears to be an hour late and a dime short. They are finally doing now what they should have done two years ago. Their stock is in ruins, their founders have split with their pensions, and all that is left is the heaping ruins of a giant that moves to slow to avoid extinction.

      If I were Sun I would have jumped quick when VA Linux came on the scene, but they ignored their obvious eventual competition (that being Linux replacing Unix) and focused on their cash cow. Now they seem set to pay the ultimate price (for a corporation that is). It's too late for them to focus into Linux the way they should have, and now they have Novell to contend with. Moving to Opterons is definitely a step in the right direction, but what can their systems do that others can't for less?

      Java was a wonderful language (and still is), but I fear Microsoft's smear campaign and broken Java plugins have convinced enough people that Java is bad. It really appears that C#, .NET (Mono), and Virtualization layers might actually win.

      A Pity

    2. Re:Who Knowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I have one, and only one question for you: Since Linux hasn't taken over the desktop and 64 bit Linux hasn't taken over the server world why is it too late for Sun?

      Oh yes, and as for Java check some job sites and compare the numbers (.NET vs Java).

    3. Re:Who Knowns by digitalhermit · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It could be one of those ideas whose time has finally arrived. My experience with Java hasn't been all that great. There are several competing Java VMs and each had idiosyncracies and problems that precluded the "write once, run anywhere" philosophy from actually working. Getting Java to work under Linux is not quite as simple as under Windows or MacOS, and messages on news groups, the Fedora Core lists, and in local LUGs attest to this.

      The latest releases are *much* easier, however. I downloaded and installed the latest Sun Java SDK on a Fedora Core 1 machine. The graphical installer put everything in /opt (not exactly LSB, but I can live with it) and exited. It didn't set JAVA_HOME or adjust any user PATH variables, but hunting through the instructions I was able to find the correct chapter (I knew this before reading, just wanted to confirm that they did say so).

      Now Java has always had this (perhaps undeserved) reputation for being slow. Not the case with Java/Fedora. Whether it's the NPTL that's part of Fedora or optimizations in the Java VM itself, the jar files I tried opened as quickly as natively compiled applications. Responsiveness was just as good. For the record I tried Jedit, Arachnophilia, Mindterm, WeirdX and a bunch of math/science applications for fractals, mapping, function graphing, etc.. Yes, a lot of the applications are already available natively under Linux, but the idea that I can move my desktop environment to anywhere without setting up automatic NFS mounts, playing with VNC servers, or fussing with roaming profiles is pretty cool.

      Now I'm not as big a Sun fan as I was five years ago, but I think this technology is pretty cool.

    4. Re:Who Knowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is nothing wrong with installing in /opt. In fact I prefer to keep binary packages in there, reserving /usr/local for stuff I have compiled and of course Debian installs its packages in /usr

    5. Re:Who Knowns by master_p · · Score: 1

      It's stupid to run local applications through a VM. The VM should cache the interpreted code to disk and recall it each time it runs.

    6. Re:Who Knowns by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wait until everything gets built natively with gcj..

    7. Re:Who Knowns by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      considering that suns 'java desktop' isn't actually made in java it doesn't matter all that much, it's just a name. besides jit(supposedly) is pretty much what you're wanting with that 'cache the interpreted code' anyways.

      having used intellij idea as ide for a while i'm pretty over the scare of desktop apps in java thing though myself(the way the desktop apps by major players are done is already partly similar anyways, being somewhat scripting of components to make them play together)..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    8. Re:Who Knowns by JamieF · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I've been waiting for that to work for several years now. Still waiting.

    9. Re:Who Knowns by JamieF · · Score: 1

      If you mean "the JVM shouldn't interpret the same code each time it runs", it doesn't, or at least not exactly. It JIT-compiles the [frequently called parts of the] code once each time it runs, and then uses the native code from then on. If you kill and restart the JVM, though, it has to re-JIT-compile the code. I suppose a slightly faster mechanism would be to cache the compiled native code to disk, like (IIRC) NT on Alpha did for x86 DLLs, or as .NET's CLR does. But I have yet to see an application that was stymied by JIT compilation overhead - more commonly the problems are overall JVM startup time, JVM memory overhead, or algorithmic mistakes that lead to extreme garbage collection overhead or memory "leaks" (forgotten references that the GC assumes are important).

      If you mean "it's stupid to load the code from the network every time", the Java Plug-in has done this for over three years:
      http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.3/docs/guide/mi sc/apple tcaching.html

  12. How does it feel to be outed, Troll-Boy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Looks like your karma-whore, then troll days are over Fux.You've been outed, and the system is reacting accordingly.

    MODERATORS: Read the parent poster's Slashdot journal before moderating this post (or any other post by or in response to Fux the Penguin)

    0W3N3D troll L053r!

  13. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by Silvers · · Score: 2, Informative

    Interesting, I could not find the paragraph you mentioned in the release.

    This is the original paragraph:

    "By running the current version of the Solaris OS on the AMD Opteron processor platform, we are experiencing substantial improvements in kernel performance for Solaris over other x86-based systems, " said John Fowler, chief technology officer, software, Sun Microsystems. "With the Solaris OS running on the AMD Opteron processor, our customers and partners can take advantage of unique features such as containers delivering virtualization and high levels of security. Solaris has led the industry in proven military grade security built-in to the OS, and with Trusted Solaris OS, offering unmatched levels of privacy."

    Either you added some creative additions (likely) or Sun changed it.

  14. MODERATORS! Read Parent Poster's Journal! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He's just a troll looking for Karma!

  15. IBM and now Sun by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    With IBM shipping Opteron boxes, and now Sun announcing, it seems the Opteron architecture probably has legs. When HP announces, all doubt will fade.

    (If you never had doubts about Opteron's ultimate prospects, consider Alpha. It had more going for it than Opteron ever did, and generations earlier. Current Alphas (EV7 and EV79) are fully competitive with current Opteron and Itanium, even without a proper engineering team for several years, yet the Alpha is "dead".)

    Intel could do a lot worse than to revive it. It may need to, to stay competitive with Opteron.

    1. Re:IBM and now Sun by mr_majestyk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When HP announces, all doubt will fade. Not very likely. That would seriously confuse their customers, given the enormous investment HP is making in Itanium.

    2. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm, HP will never announce. Why would they when they've invested so much in Itanium and Itanium II?

    3. Re:IBM and now Sun by October_30th · · Score: 1
      Intel could do a lot worse than to revive it. It may need to, to stay competitive with Opteron.

      Now that would be wonderful. Alpha was a thing of beauty (I owned one in the late 1990s), but I doubt Intel could pull off the revival. First of all, it would be a suicide to admit that there's anything wrong with the Itanium-line. Secondly, all the engineers and scientists who created and maintained Alpha are long gone.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    4. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Earth to ``insert someword here''.

      You said: ``When HP announces, all doubt will fade.''

      I say: HP is heavily invested in the Itainium Architecture. It is the successor to their PA-RISC line. HP-UX runs on both PA-RISC and Itainium. Hrm.. Let's see, who is still selling Alpha... Hrm... That's right, it's HP... So please tell me again how they are going to give legs to the Opteron? I thought as much...

    5. Re:IBM and now Sun by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 1

      Intel should revive it. the Itanium blows.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has said they will not use the "O" CPU unless Dell does. Both HP and Dell are in bed with intel.

    7. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Alrighty.. Who designed the Athlon and the Opteron? And where did he come from? And what is so special about him? Ohh my...

      The Alpha line has contributed a lot to AMD's CPU lines, even if they are only conceptual at worst and emulated at best.

      Think about the Athlon Bus.

    8. Re:IBM and now Sun by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1
      "all the engineers and scientists who created and maintained Alpha are long gone"

      Intel hired them.

    9. Re:IBM and now Sun by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Itanium 1 blew chunks. Very slowly.

      Itanium 2 actaully contains a fair bit of Alpha technology, and in the right situations is not a bad processor. (It's not my style of processor though, I'm anti-VLIW pro-OOO).

      However, if all the investment within DEC and Compaq and HPaq that was diverted to other projects over the last few years had been maintained for the Alpha project, I'm sure that the hypothetical late-2003 Alphas would be more powerful than the I2.

      It was burried alive, there's no denying that.
      Good to see a bunch of them at #2 on the top-500 still.
      However, I think it's too late to revive it, that's just a pipe-dream now. (As it's potentially commercial suicide for HP, amongst other reasons.)

      I think that only IBM can be the new DEC now. Intel/AMD/HP have got backward compatability 'issues' (yeah, the Itanium's an albatross round their neck, and it's only a few years old!). The only "fresh start" that's got a future is the Power architecture. IMHO.
      (And I say that as an Alpha-fanboy, and not that Power is particularly fresh, but it was designed with as much of a future as the Alpha was - 20 years or so, assumig they don't commit chipicide.).

      YAW

      --
      Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
    10. Re:IBM and now Sun by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "given the enormous investment HP is making in Itanium"

      Exactly. HP will be the last major manufacturer to announce Opteron servers. They will only do it when market pressure grows too great not to.

      Recall that HP just spent enormous capital (of all kinds) absorbing Compaq. They don't have much of a cushion to ride out the Itanium failure. Therefore, they may well be forced to field Opterons despite their misgivings. When that happens, that will be the final imprimatur for Opteron.

      By then, maybe Alpha will have been revived, and maybe G5 or G6 will be making a good showing. As Linux moves up the food chain, the artificial concentration on a single architecture, as enforced under MS's hegemony, will begin to melt. When only habit, and not market forces, make you choose x86, then price, performance, and secondary criteria like reliability, power management, and responsiveness to market demand start to matter more.

    11. Re:IBM and now Sun by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 1

      I agree. I think the problem is that HP didn't want to be maintaining three different architectures. It has a major stake in Itanium, and it still needs to support PA-RISC as well as Alpha. I think the reason Alpha systems are still available is to fulfill certain major contracts.

      I really can't say whether Intel owns any of Alpha, but it can be arranged from HP if need be.

      Compute-wise Itanium2 is reasonably competitive (compare the TFLOPS per CPU in the top 10 supercomputer list) but it has a stigma and I think a price premium. They will be making a lower voltage and smaller cache version (to 1.5MB) to make them more cost-effective.

    12. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Who designed the Athlon and the Opteron?"

      AMD

    13. Re:IBM and now Sun by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      Intel purchased all of the Alpha IP from Compaq a few months before the merger was announced. Their plan was to integrate the good stuff into Itanium. It was quite a surprise at the time, but turned out that Compaq was streamlining their operations in preparation for the merger. HP has the right to continue development for 1 or 2 more generations (actually they are obligated to a few large current customers to continue for a certain period). Mostly off the subject, I love the fact that Intel's Itanium ads have a picture of the wafer, it's pretty sad that you can count the chips on a 3" picture of the wafer.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    14. Re:IBM and now Sun by _fuzz_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

      [Alpha] had more going for it than Opteron ever did, and generations earlier.

      Maybe from an engineering perspective, but one thing Opteron has that Alpha doesn't is compatibility with existing x86 applications. That's going to mean a lot to a lot of people because they think it will reduce the cost of a transition. Whether or not it is actually cheaper is irrelevant if customers think Opteron will make it cheaper.

      --
      47% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
    15. Re:IBM and now Sun by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Alpha will never be revived, the internal engineering expertise is for all intents gone and HP has little intention rebuilding it. 64bit future is either x86-64 and/or Itanic, unless intel do an about face and create their own 64bit x86 ISA (in which case that ISA will no doubt win).

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    16. Re:IBM and now Sun by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      Intel have non-exclusive rights to alpha, at least 21164 anyway, from their settlement with DEC. Presumably that settlement covered future alpha designs too.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    17. Re:IBM and now Sun by Paul+Jakma · · Score: 1

      As did AMD.

      --
      I use Friend/Foe + mod-point modifiers as a karma/reputation system.
    18. Re:IBM and now Sun by Boone^ · · Score: 1

      It's the Inquirer, so grain of salt required:
      Rumour of big HP Opteron deal rolls around
      http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=9911

    19. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has stated the direction is to migrate existing Alpha customers to Itanium. Once the VMS port was complete it was a done deal (VMS being the only reason Alpha lasted as long as it did). HPUX on Itanium runs great and scales much better than anything on x86, which is why the HP strategy is to replace PA-RISC with Itanium. Opteron is dead. Sparc is dead. The only question is whether IBMs Power or Itanium will be dominant in three to five years.

    20. Re:IBM and now Sun by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 1
      VMS being the only reason Alpha lasted as long as it did

      Clue... Alpha lasted as long as it did because its major market was the Feds, notably the NSA. They run Tru64 on it. Football-field-size rooms full of racks of them run DSP algorithms, scanning telephone conversations for keywords. That is also why Itanium had to have fast floating point, and why the Virginia Tech G5 supercomputer will turn out to be such a problem for Intel. If G5s can do DSP faster, the NSA will happily port to G5 instead of Itanium. (Unix is Unix.) Opteron is out of the running, there; its floating point is only fast enough for normal customers.

      Without the Feds' patronage, there's nothing to support the Itanium's price premium.

    21. Re:IBM and now Sun by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      The only problems being that HPUX on Itanium has no applications, can't run 32 bit apps without emulation and still doesn't scale anywhere near Sparc and is also very hot and very expensive. Apart from that and the total lack of customers, they're really onto something.

    22. Re:IBM and now Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right, the NSA runs DSP algorithms on expensive alphas, as opposed to a huge bank of cheap DSPs.

      Try thinking a bit harder.

  16. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by oldmanmtn · · Score: 4, Funny
    optimizing their syndicated dynamic solutions marketbase...cross-media functionalities...enterprise-level mindshare paradigms

    Good god man! You've created a Content Black Hole! You're dragging down the Scores of every post in the vicinity!

    --
    - Old Man of the Mountain ---- "I want to disturb my neighbor"
  17. Excellent! by painehope · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The AMD64 ( or x86-64, whatever we're calling it this week ) architecture is very promising, and Sun is still an excellent vendor ( despite numerous blunders...they've made some horrible mistakes, but they've also had some great successes ).
    This has the potential to breathe new life into both vendors, and gives us all an alternative, which is important in a marketplace that has such a dynamic history but is currently being choked to death by certain vendors that think marketing is more important than quality.
    Now who should I get my next worksation from, IBM w/ SUSE or RHWS, or Sun w/ their desktop Linux stack? Hmm...

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
  18. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by ignipotentis · · Score: 1

    Solaris has led the industry in proven military grade security built-in to the OS, and with Trusted Solaris OS, offering unmatched levels of privacy, second only to the Windows .NET security framework.

    Second to Microsoft? How is this good for SUN?

    --
    Don't waste time... procrastinate now!
  19. Big Iron! by beezly · · Score: 2, Funny

    What we all want to know is, when do we get to see 106 CPU Opteron systems!? Tiny little 8 cpu systems just don't cut it any more!

    1. Re:Big Iron! by leerpm · · Score: 2, Funny

      Put 106 AMD chips in one box, and you will be giving new meaning to the product line SunFire!

    2. Re:Big Iron! by bobbozzo · · Score: 1

      Sadly, no one is even making 8-cpu Opteron systems or motherboards.

      --
      Nothing to see here; Move along.
  20. And 500000+ JDS sold to China. Woohoo!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, Sun started doing something right, it seems (http://www.theregister.com/content/61/34036.html) that China is going to roll out 500000 to 1 mill Suns (linux of course) desktops (infamous Java Desktop Systems) during next year. McNealy says something about 500 mil alternative desktop plan China has, I don't know if he can be trusted on that one, but I suuuure would love that. Heh, what would I give to see a look on Ballmer face when he hear about this one. And just few days after Brasil.

  21. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by JamesP · · Score: 1

    second only to the Windows .NET security framework.

    I never thought Solaris was that bad

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  22. Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by ChrisRijk · · Score: 4, Informative
    Register article
    Along with the Opteron systems, Sun announced a big win for its Java Desktop System. The Chinese government will roll out 500,000 to one million PCs with the software over the next year.

    "This, I believe makes us the number one Linux player on the planet," McNealy said. "The goal is to reach the Chinese government's goal of 500 million alternative desktops, and you can decide what alternative means."

    1. Re:Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by rihock · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Java Desktop is nice, don't get me wrong. But, I look at the Solaris desktop, running on probably the best implementation of Unix, and all I see is a crap GUI. I think Sun should develop a better interface for the solaris desktop---if apple OS X can run on BSD, then Sun should be able to make something just as killer for Solaris

      --
      # nohup ./start_sig
    2. Re:Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by ChrisRijk · · Score: 2, Interesting

      JDS (Java Desktop System) runs off Gnome etc.
      Solaris is moving to Gnome (ie JDS) to be default UI.

      ie if you had a Sun system and a Linux/x86 system with JDS side by side, the UI would be identical.

      At Comdex they had JDS running on a Sun Ray (which runs of SPARC/Solaris servers)

      So, you'll get your wish ^-^

    3. Re:Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by moosesocks · · Score: 1

      This is somewhat ironic that sun makes a huge push into the consumer linux market less than a week after Bill Joy (one of Sun's original founders) quits Sun, and openly admits that he perfers OS X to Linux in almost all circumstances - "linux is for kids" as he stated in a recent interview in Wired.

      Either way, the servers are great news for both AMD and Sun.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    4. Re:Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by pmz · · Score: 1

      "This, I believe makes us the number one Linux player on the planet," McNealy said.

      Not a bad soundbyte; not bad at all. Looking forward to the future IT market, he should be grinning ear-to-ear. UltraSPARC and Opteron are not a bad portfolio and gives Sun a really good hedge in the 64-bit market. Put Solaris and Linux on them both, and they will probably find themselves on top of a gold mine. Not only that, Sun still has no strings (at least very few strings) attached to Microsoft.

    5. Re:Sun also announces 0.5-1m desktop win in China by christophersaul · · Score: 1

      Solaris 9 supports Gnome out of the box, Gnome and KDE have been available via Sun for Solaris for a couple of years now.

  23. HP and IBM Lacking an OS? by christooley · · Score: 2, Informative

    Wow, did they really just say what I thought they said? Lacking an OS? How could HP be lacking an OS for a processor (Itanium) it virtually built? How could IBM's usage of Linux be taken as anything but having an OS for those platforms. What a load.

    1. Re:HP and IBM Lacking an OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you have ever used HP-UX you would also say HP is lacking an OS :)

    2. Re:HP and IBM Lacking an OS? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HP has an OS: OpenVMS. Unfortunately, they seem intent on killing it.

    3. Re:HP and IBM Lacking an OS? by ipjohnson · · Score: 1

      Don't forget VMS and Tru64 (used to be OSF).

      Not that I'm saying Tru64 is nice to work with but it is stable as hell.

  24. Will the Sun deal be enough... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... to boost the Opteron to the number two slowest selling server CPU position?

    1. Re:Will the Sun deal be enough... by nelsonal · · Score: 1

      They already are the second slowest selling server CPU. Itanium is the slowest, and given this deal, and their competitive price they might give SGI's MIPS impementation (is that next or is it one of HP's many architectures) a run for its money as the third slowest selling CPU. The game is on if/when it approaches Xeon. Not bad for an architecture that has been out for less than a year.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  25. Re:The stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The entire market is down due to terrorist threats against Asia, America and Europe over the weekend.

  26. The Question now is... Why Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why would I want to run solaris on x86 hardware. Are they actually going to support it better on x86 hardware because from what I remember... Sparc got a nice version and x86 got the shaft with many-a-tool-a-missing.

    Also, Solaris is almost an antique now and lacks many of the nice tools that linux gives by default. Does anyone know if they still have that archaic version of vi. What about the shells? Do they support the "less" command. Sure you can compile all of these, but I don't need a GNU/Solaris(oxymoron?). What fun is it finding non-stop needed tools and having to compile them or install from binary.

    I don't want to bash Sun, but if given the choice of linux or Solaris on commodity hardware... I would pick linux without blinking.

    1. Re:The Question now is... Why Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I'm the kind of person who prefers vi because it allows me to have a decent understanding of any type of vi, like vim. Same with more, it works everywhere.

      What about shells? bash, zsh and tcsh in the install since Solaris 8. Gnome has been there for a few years now too.

    2. Re:The Question now is... Why Sun? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A lot has changed since Solaris 2.5. The current version is 9. You can also try out a development release of the next version here.

  27. No pulled punches by painehope · · Score: 4, Funny

    stands as a beacon for HP and IBM customers facing a dead-end Unix, and Microsoft customers frustrated with security and fragility
    I wouldn't be surprised if they kicked a dog on the way off the stage...

    --
    PC moderators can suck my White pierced, tattooed dick. If you think pride == hate, s/dick/Aryan meat mallet/g.
    1. Re:No pulled punches by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 1
      I wouldn't be surprised if they kicked a dog on the way off the stage...

      Sig: Don't be surprised when you feed hotsauce to a Rottweiler and wake up in the hospital.

      "And today's winner in the dog-mistreatment-imagery-density category is..."

      Can we assume that the sig relates to a real-life event?

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    2. Re:No pulled punches by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
      I had a bad experience.

      Ow come on, it's just dogs...

      I had a bad experience!

      --
      "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
      --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  28. Re:The stock market by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Bwahahahahaha!

    Yeah, blame it all on "the terrorists".

    Asshat.

  29. Re:don't buy them from Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He means "lip service". That is, they claim to support the movement, but don't back it up with actions.

  30. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from fux the penguin's journal: I think it's great that Sun is finally breaking into the commodity hardware business, while still optimizing their syndicated dynamic solutions marketbase through enhanced Solaris offerings. While this may be true, they have a long way to go to true cross-media functionalities, as the AMD processor is currently unable to support XDML enhanced DSS encryption, which is required in order to implement enterprise-level mindshare paradigms.

    ---

    Oh man, this is heee-larious! Now some idiots are following me around, replying with links to my journal, and acting as if somehow I've been "found out!" Ummm...since I put all this stuff in my journal, do you really think I care? Do you really think most knee-jerk slashbot moderators are actually going to check anybody's posting history or journal before moderating? Do you really think the absolute asshats who decided to point out all the flaws in my "use the hubble for space tourism" troll are going to actually THINK or READ before posting? Hardly! If they did, this wouldn't be /.!

    I laugh at you.

  31. Union of the underdogs? by Shutter_BC · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I've been an AMD fan for quite a while, as anyone who reads articles at Anandtech tends to become. This has been more or less already stated, but... where is this going to lead without a strong media presence or public interest? I wonder how Sun and AMD plan to educate non-techies and convince them that they're cool.

    I wish the both of them the best of luck, and one of these days, may good engineering prevail. I hope.

    1. Re:Union of the underdogs? by Cyno · · Score: 0, Troll

      I've been an AMD fan for a while, too.

      But the problem with AMD and Sun is they would love to be the next Intel and Microsoft, complete with vendor lock-in, anti-competitive actions, and the ability to leverage a monopoly to force their users to conform to the way they want to offer their products/prices.

      AMD64, for example, is not any cheaper than Intel's top of the line. And just look at how Sun has acted recently with respect to SCO and their own customers and future markets.

      These companies just don't get it and I don't think my supporting them with help them understand anytime soon. The more power and money they get and more they want. They're greedy. And I don't think they really care about their technology.

      I wish them luck, but I fear if they get lucky us consumers will be in the same mess we currently have with Intel and Microsoft.

      But at least we have a choice.

    2. Re:Union of the underdogs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      convince them that they're cool

      maybe they need the Green Men Group?

    3. Re:Union of the underdogs? by elmegil · · Score: 1
      But the problem with AMD and Sun is they would love to be the next Intel and Microsoft, complete with vendor lock-in, anti-competitive actions, and the ability to leverage a monopoly to force their users to conform to the way they want to offer their products/prices.

      I work for Sun, and I call you full of it. Care to back up your BS claims with some hard facts? Or is it enough in your little world that Sun isn't all up on the Linux bandwagon 110%?

      I'm really curious how you can say on one hand "the same mess" and on the other hand "we have a choice". What, you think Sun is going to take that choice away? How?

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    4. Re:Union of the underdogs? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      I used to work for Sun, too. And we're both full of it. But that doesn't change the fact that they act like a child, at least in their PR releases, doing everything they can to take sales away from Linux because of some alleged claims from SCO.

      Care to back up Sun with some facts showing how good the company is for consumers? How it cares more about its own products and customers than money and market share? Or are you just bitching?

      Sun, being the UNIX leader they are, should have been up on the Linux bandwagon 110%. They are not. Who's fault is that? Their management, that's right.

      We always have a choice with Linux, fool.

    5. Re:Union of the underdogs? by elmegil · · Score: 1
      I don't recall making any claims about Sun's motivations, much less their behavior or PR. You are one who should put up or shut up, as the one "just bitching". I asked you to put up or shut up, and you put words in my mouth. Very nice.

      If you're going to claim Sun is greedy and only after their own monopoly, provide facts or admit you're the only one here full of shit.

      Oh, and go find someone else to cry about your ex-employee status to; sounds to me like your attitude was a big part of why you're no longer with us, and good thing, too.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    6. Re:Union of the underdogs? by Cyno · · Score: 1

      Fine:

      http://www.linuxworld.com/story/34437.htm

      Found just what I was looking for. Here, let me quote that for ya:

      "[Scott McNealy, CEO] reportedly told the high-profile event, complete with TV cameras and an audience of maybe a thousand, where they were launching something called Java Tarik ONE, "Don't use Linux; use Solaris." By some tortured logic and giant leaps that included cautioning people against open source, Scotty reportedly got from StarOffice as open source to equating all of Sun's software with open source to literally suggesting that Solaris was open source after a brief detour equating Apache with the open source Sun ONE. "We use open source," he reportedly concluded, "so that you get the benefits without the worries. We give you the insurance."

      Basicly, they only care about the money. Just like Microsoft. And that's not the only time they dissed Linux or OSS. Just the first example I could find quickly.

      And I'd never work for Sun again. They couldn't pay me enough to put up with their office politics again. Some people, like me, don't work for money. We work because we're genuinely fascinated by the technology. We love to work.

      BTW, You're full of shit! :)

      Have a nice day.

  32. Reported by Slashdot? by szquirrel · · Score: 4, Informative

    We previously reported rumored plans to this effect a few days back.

    Where "previously reported" means "we linked to the article on news.com".

    Credit where credit is due?

    --
    Never approach a vast undertaking with a half-vast plan.
  33. Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    My friend at work told me that Sun released SunOS i386 and than canned it, abandoning their customers. A year or two ago they abandoned their Solaris x86 customers. 'They' say that 'the third time is a charm', so who can say when they will abandon their Solaris on AMD customers?

    1. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When has Sun abandoned Solaris on x86? Isn't that wahat x86 Solaris 9 is?

    2. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://techupdate.zdnet.com/techupdate/stories/mai n/0,14179,2843230,00.html

    3. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      When they announced Solaris 9, they said something fairly vague, like that it wouldn't be available for x86 at the time it was released for SPARC. Of course, people wanted them to be more specific and explain whether this meant a delay in the release of x86 version or no x86 version ever. As you can expect, they didn't answer that question.

      They released Solaris 9 for SPARC. Then, some time passed (maybe a year?) and they released the x86 version of Solaris 9. During that time, they continue to support Solaris 8 customers on x86.

      Now, they are making available some beta releases of Solaris 10, and they are available for both SPARC and x86, so it looks like the two versions will have simultaneous release this time.

      So basically, Sun didn't abandon their customers, but they did make them really uneasy for a while there. (It was during a time when Sun was *really* short on cash, so it's partly understandable.) Whether they had intended to axe it and changed their minds or whether they always meant only that it was delayed, well that's up for debate...

    4. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://wwws.sun.com/software/solaris/x86/index.htm l

      Feel free to stfu and check the facts next time.

      Thanks.

    5. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No.

    6. Re:Is Solaris on AMD the next to be canned? by natd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Certainly I understood at the time (2001?) that x86 support was at an end. I use Solasis 8 to run Oracle - and within a few weeks of learning that Solaris for intel *looked* to be finished, I had Oracle for Linux media on my shelf as a contingency.

      As it turns out, Sun did release Solaris 9 for x86...and I stayed on Solaris 8 anyway.

      I guess that's is the beauty of an open market where we aren't cornered into a propriety solution. If one vendor does something we really don't like we have options.

      --
      Only big ligs use sigs.
  34. Re:don't buy them from Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are you sure that music is coming from the lips on their face?

  35. And how good is that? by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
    [..] offering unmatched levels of privacy, second only to the Windows .NET security framework.

    Second to .NET's security? I have a bad feeling about this...

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  36. Hey! HEY! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does everyone forget Sun sold commodity hardware for many years?

    Yes, they go back further than 1995.

  37. Sun announces "We'll try anything" by BoomerSooner · · Score: 1

    Since they are obviously in a period of decline. I wonder if Sun Microsystems will exist in its current form in the next 5-10 years. I wouldn't bet money on it.

    1. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Small stock price = small, bad company. Right?

      Your quips show your lack of understanding.

    2. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're the one with the complete lack of understanding. He demonstrated that SUNW is a company in decline - and the stock market also agrees with his assessment.

    3. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, the last two years have been really, really hard on Sun stock. But then, during the Internet boom, it soared so high that it's not even funny.

      However, if you look at the last 3 months, it's actually beaten both the Dow and the NASDAQ . However, it has also fluctuated quite a lot. IMHO, the jury is still definitely out on the future of Sun.

      One point of view is that Sun is an OK company that's pretty healthy, but it is also the kind of company that is going to be bitten really hard by a bad economy (b/c its products are not low-end items) and out of a backlash against "internet companies". However, the economy is turning around, and the stock market is start to lose its fear of tech.

    4. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and we know how enlightened the stock market is.. Enron was looking pretty solid.

      DOH!

    5. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by gl4ss · · Score: 1

      he demanstrated that sun is in decline because it's stock is in decline and stock market agrees with that?

      anough with the *dying. call me when it's dead(it would be funny if, for example, microsoft has been pulling an enron type of scam).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    6. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Can't you see they've been steady for the last year an a half?

    7. Re:Sun announces "We'll try anything" by Dick+Faze · · Score: 1

      Sun is dying because their price/performance is so bad compared to Intel that their superior Solaris operating system, reliability reputation and integration no longer make up for the cost differential. Windows still sucks, but its gotten better and is now considered "good enough" for a lot more enterprise-level tasks than it was a few years back (whether this is good or bad is debatable, whether this is hurting Sun is not). Along with Linux, which is damaging Sun twice as much as Microsoft, and HP, who have a great alternative to Solaris on Sparc with HPUX on Itanium 2 (look at the $$ and performance before flaming me), Sun is dead dead.

  38. oh wow by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder how many people this actually affects around here? Two? Three?

  39. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AGP slot?

    We're talking servers here, not your neighborhood online gaming establishment!

  40. I see this as by ShadowRage · · Score: 1, Interesting

    a competitive move towards the OTHER major x86 unix-like system, linux. why would sun do this? 2 reasons..
    1. Make it look like they arent with linux to avoid any crap with sco
    2. After helping linux, they realize this thing could turn into a giant that could eat them in one bite

    thse could be the reasons.. that or they really mean to compete with IBM and intel and microsoft, who has often rubbed them the wrong way (mainly the ugly java incident) I bet their main goal is microsoft, and since intel is often in bed with microsoft, intel's probably their second target, that and amd doesnt share ties with microsoft (none that I've heard of) so the amd platform would be a much safer choice, that and they are technologically better at times.
    What I really wouldnt mine seeing pushed is PPC cpu, that's a good little processor, and let's face it, x86 is old technology that keeps getting stuff added on. PPC's are perfect for multimedia and most things that people do, sell them in a mass production, they become as low priced as the x86...
    intel and microsoft are the only reasons we're still using x86's.. would be cool if AMD started on a PPC clone (if legally possible) as a secondary market for processors..
    if we could start seeing that, then that would be sweet, and that could help sun too if they want to enterprise on their product.

  41. Sun still has... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The superior thin-client platform. I know, I know, thin-clients suckm niche market, yadda yadda.

    So far though, sun rays have only run on Sparcs and Solaris, which has been holding them back. I'm not saying it'll necessarily take Sun back to its salad days, but porting Sun Ray server to Lintel plus reducing the price like they already have plus the Java desktop could really keep them in business.

  42. Re:The stock market by PierceLabs · · Score: 1

    Sure, Sun is such an important player that they have drug down the entire stockmarket....

  43. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by Pieroxy · · Score: 1

    1. overheating issues with OEM heatsink/fans
    I guess they can replace the OEM's fans with some better ones. One might even think that they would ship some better HS/F for such a big partner.

    2. fans locking up
    Hmmm. See 1. I still don't see how this is a big problem.

    3. motherboard chipsets frying
    Well, bad motherboard. Don't put the blame on AMD, but on the Mobo manufacturer.

    4. AGP slot working
    I don't this this is going to be any issue on a server. Plus, see 3.

    5. etc...
    Well, I guess the "etc" includes the real problems then. Care to elaborate?

  44. I'm really glad to see this by Avardan · · Score: 1

    Even tough Sun might be *extremely* late in their response to the market, this move certainly seems like a good one. Let's just hope they can write their device drivers quickly to be in the same league as Linux.

    --
    Ma gavte la nata
  45. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by Zenki · · Score: 1

    It is entirely possible that the original poster was making multiproc workstations for 3d artists.

  46. Can Sun drag down AMD? by JThundley · · Score: 1

    I really like AMD, and I've heard all of the "Sun is dying and losing it's big business name" stuff.
    There's no way that Sun can drag them down right? This can only benefit AMD, right?

  47. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shut your lying mouth...

    A) Stop buying remarked chips because AMD doesn't have a 50% RMA ratio.

    b) Stop saying stuff about the Motherboards because AMD doesn't produce them like Intel does.

    C) And stop your lying. You setup something wrong or did something wrong. You must have something confused with the setup because I have never had a dead AMD chip in my MANY machines I have built. The Palmino chips ran hot, but even the tbred-A chips ran cool.

    D) You don't have failing fans. You are just lying about that. Even if you did, the server class MB would have simple turned the system off since AMD NOW has temperature safety locks.

    E) I just simply don't believe you. You are probably lying.

  48. Wow by EmCeeHawking · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like they're really taking a big RISC.

  49. Hey guys... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...get with it. Solaris 8? That's way old. Yes, it comes with loads of GNU and Open Source stuff on the Companion CD, but so does Solaris 9. That comes with GNOME too. KDE is on the Companion CD. I can't believe you're still talking about Solaris 8 and older. The new version of Solaris is nearly out... and you can try it early, on x86. It's called Solaris Express. You can download it for free from www.sun.com

  50. What about a compiler? by mi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Sun offers a fairly advanced compiler and, perhaps more importantly, "performance libraries" on their Sparc machines. Intel is doing the same on their machines -- Linux, FreeBSD (via port), and Windows. Will Sun do likewise with AMD or will they just help GCC in the amd64 optimization area(s)?

    --
    In Soviet Washington the swamp drains you.
    1. Re:What about a compiler? by pmz · · Score: 1

      Will Sun do likewise with AMD or will they just help GCC in the amd64 optimization area(s)?

      I've never used them, but my copy of Sun's compiler has x86-specific flags. It would be good for Sun to put their compiler people to work on Opteron, as Sun's compiler seems to be more aggressive than GCC (it did out-smart the SPEC people for the UltraSPARC III, at least).

  51. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
    Bite me....Anyway...

    A. These aren't remarked chips. They were bought from a good vendor (NewEgg) and were retail box with AMD approved heatsink/fan combo.
    B. AMD provides the specs for the chipsets TO the manuafacturers. Put on some glasses sometime and check out the name on the chipset. It'll say AMD.
    C. The systems ran fine for about 8 months straight.
    D. The fans in question were the AMD approved fans. On the Athlons we still have left, I have replaced the OEM ones with Thermaltakes.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  52. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by maxpublic · · Score: 2, Informative

    And on the other side of the anecdotal and completely irrelevant evidence fence, I've never once had a problem with AMD's processors on the very large number of installs that I've done and supported. Not a single one.

    Of course, I've also been smart enough to make sure each unit either comes equipped with a set of quality fans, or to pass along the order for the same to staff. And we don't select for substandard motherboards either. The smart professional will spend the few extra bucks to avoid the problems inherent in cheap knock-off equipment, especially if the units are running 24/7.

    Leaving these sorts of decisions to manufacturers - who're quite likely to give you the worst parts available - is just begging for trouble. No matter who produces the actual CPU.

    Max

    --
    My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
  53. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by _UnderTow_ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know what you were doing wrong, but i've build HUNDREDS of machines based on AMD products, from Duron 700's to current generation Athlon XP/MP's. I have NEVER had a problem with one of their chips. If your fan is locking up you might want to look into your environment. Where do you have the damn servers, in a woodworking shop or something?

  54. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by You're+All+Wrong · · Score: 1

    Christ. I nearly "Foe"'d you on the spot for that.
    However, on second and third reading I decided against it.
    It's actually chocka full of goodies if you read it closely!

    YAW.

    --
    Your head of state is a corrupt weasel, I hope you're happy.
  55. Tales from the Server Room by Gothmolly · · Score: 1

    The plural of anecdote is not data.

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  56. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    You have to stop buying hardware that falls off the back of a truck my friend.

    Not only do I run an Athlon-XP at home, I have a K6 that has been serving web-pages since 2000. Continuously, in a non-airconditioned apartment and in a dusty hayfield. While there were a few chipset oopsies for my mother board, that was Via's goof. They made the mobo chipset (and the Linux kernel compiled around it.) BTW, intel chipsets have every bit as many work arounds.

    Fans you are on your own about. Having had fans quit on PIII's as often as Athlons I'd say your argument is a straw man.

    Did you have problems? I don't doubt it. Do they have anything to do with your AMD microprocessor? Hell no.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  57. No BIOS please... by x0 · · Score: 1

    ...I want my Sun Operton systems to have a real OBP. I don't care for peecee compatibility as long as the Big Aluminum (tm) boxen, if such ever get produced, aren't tied to some crummy BIOS.

    --
    In the immortal words of Socrates, who said; 'I drank what?'
    1. Re:No BIOS please... by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 1

      Sun can use Open Firmware on their x86 machines if they want.

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    2. Re:No BIOS please... by calidoscope · · Score: 1
      ...I want my Sun Operton systems to have a real OBP.

      I'd second that motion and follow it up with getting more Graphics/Disk controller/General I/O cards with Open Firmware out to the market.

      It would be even nicer if the device support for the Opteron boxes makes it back to the Sparc boxes. It would also be really nice if Sun expanded the USB and 1394 hardware that is supported by Solaris - they'll need that if they're serious about selling Opteron's to the masses.

      --
      A Shadeless room is a brighter room.
  58. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by bigjnsa500 · · Score: 1
    Completely different my friend. True, K6's will probably run forever. It will probably still run if the heatsink came off.

    Your XP on the other hand is different. A lot higher clock speed, higher memory speed, a LOT more heat and you probabaly turn the sucker off at night. Here we don't. We leave them on 24/7 to run analysis software.

    I don't see what the big deal is with everybody getting pissed I said I wouldn't buy AMD again. I am sure they are very good for gaming. But for true processing and analysis their stability is the issue. That's all I'm saying.

    --
    This is a test. This is a test of the emergency sig system. This has been only a test.
  59. I wonder if Sun will be calling their new line as by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 2, Funny

    'Java64' architecture based ...

  60. Sigh by BlueTrin · · Score: 1

    I guess that this will change how the weather derivatives options are priced.

    --
    Don't you know it is now both immoral and criminal to think beyond the next quarterly report?
  61. Re:But will this really help web-focused enterpris by illumin8 · · Score: 1

    "With the Solaris OS running on the AMD Opteron processor, our customers and partners can take advantage of unique features such as containers delivering virtualization and high levels of security..."

    I would also like to add that you'll see the first Opteron workstations and servers about the same time that Solaris 10 technology preview is available. Sun has chosen to implement IA-64 into the kernel in the Solaris 10 release, which also adds some great new functionality such as true virtualization and containers that are even more powerful than chroot jails. Think of the ability to partition a single box into as many different virtual machines as you want, each completely isolated from each other and each having their own unique root account. The benefits for server consolidation projects and virtual hosting applications are obvious.

    --
    "When the president does it, that means it's not illegal." - Richard M. Nixon
  62. Re:don't buy them from Sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The movement"? So Linux *is* a religion them. Hallelujah!

  63. HP to intro Athlon 64 desktop today by whig · · Score: 3, Informative

    According to the Inquirer:

    AMD IS LIKELY to get a boost from Hewlett Packard today, with reports saying the firm will start selling a Presario 8000Z as soon as Wednesday.

    According to the report on cnet.mp3.com, HP will offer a variety of different options with the desktop, which will be available in retail this week.

    The machine, the report says, is just one of a family of Athlon 64 desktops HP will sell, and costs $1,239 for a basic machine.

    But HP won't start using the Athlon FX - a sort of Opteron - for a little while, it appears. If and when it does, it will be offered as a gaming machine.

    The announcement is a boost for AMD, coupled with Sun's expected endorsement of its Opteron microprocessors today.

    --
    Peace and love, y'all
    1. Re:HP to intro Athlon 64 desktop today by lewiscr · · Score: 1

      The news.com.com artcile has more meat.

  64. Please report to your local re-education camp.. by clink · · Score: 1

    Your groupthink is obviously broken. After all, every problem with an AMD box is the either the fault of the user or a 3rd party hardware maker or a bug in the software or it's a bogus chip or blah blah blah...

    I've had two Athlons. Both boxes are flakey especially(!) if you don't use conditioned power. I've had much better luck since I put it on the UPS.

    1. Re:Please report to your local re-education camp.. by LightJockey · · Score: 1

      If your AC power supply is bad, it doesn't matter what processor you're using!

      --
      Mouse, Mice. Goose, Geese. Moose... Moose?
    2. Re:Please report to your local re-education camp.. by clink · · Score: 1

      Actually, my Intel box had greater tolerance for whatever noise was in the AC. I don't recall it locking up or rebooting like the Athlons. Go figure.

  65. Benefit: Optimized Java VM by carbon60 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The obvious Good Thing about this announcement is that SUN will need to provide a heavily optimised, 64-bit Java implementation for the Opteron.

    --

    --
    Adam Sherman
    Freelance Geek
    1. Re:Benefit: Optimized Java VM by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that is why I am so happy to hear this. Unavailability of J2SDK for Opteron (well, and debian/amd64 is still beta) is keeping me and my employer back from upgrading our hardware to Opterons. Now it seems j2sdk will be out for Opteron much sooner than i expected, it WILL have to be.

      --Coder

  66. they're not "Java based" by penguin7of9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    The meat in "Java-based systems" is good old C and C++ software. Sun's "Java desktop" is Gnome with a Java runtime shipping with it. Sun's "Java server" stuff is a C kernel with C userland stuff and a Java runtime.

    Sun loves to attach the name "Java" to anything they can, to cover up the fact that what people actually do with Java is pretty limited. In that sense, they aren't all that different from Microsoft and ".NET".

    1. Re:they're not "Java based" by herman_ang · · Score: 1

      I still don't understand why the Java came out with the name "Java Platform". How does it differ from my linux box installed with J2RE and J2SDK. Can't wait to see another failure of Sun.

  67. Had to say it by aardwolf204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been an AMD fan for quite a while

    You must be very dizzy. My AMD fan goes 5000 RPM.


    Sorry, couldnt resist. I like AMD too, and yes, Anand could take Tom any day.

    --
    Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  68. Re:This is the beginning of the end for Sun by Corpus_Callosum · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Their only strength was hardware and support. Now they will ship commodity hardware and compete with a company that kicks ass in support (IBM). I kinda feel sorry for them, they should have fired Scott McNealy LOONG time ago.

    Not true. It's not like Sun is going to stop doing what it normally does. It is simply expanding it's product offerings in the same way that IBM has.

    People that were going to buy AMD or x86 now have the option of going with Sun, where they would have had to chosen a different vendor before.

    --
    The reason that it can be true that 1+1 > 2 is that very peculiar nonzero value of the + operator
  69. Hmm by Greyfox · · Score: 1

    Didn't SGI pull a similar stunt with the Itanic? Granted, this is a bit different (SGI was also leaning toward Windows NT) but this sort of move makes me nervous.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  70. I'm happy they are making those sys't more afforda by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -ble...

    Now.. To assist the Aurora Linux team and give them strong docs on the system level assembly functions so the rest of Open Source community can get back to embracing Sun Microsystems...

    Then ACTUALLY HOSTING some of the sunfreeware stuff that everyone is desperatly trying to mirror...

    I say that even though the package format sun has now is easy to use I wish (WISH!) that they would go toward a package format that would support all other packages including doing dependency checks for required non-native libraries.

  71. OS? by VoraciousGorak · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sun Operating System... am I the only one that instantly thought of S.O.S. as an acronym?

  72. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 1
    Indeed, we should all be content to walk our own paths. We should be content in the knowledge that for whatever reason the choices made differently work for the other person.

    FWIW my XP is on 24/7. But I will qualify that. It has run 24/7 since I reformatted it Linux. Prior to that it ran ME, later XP, and it wouldn't stay on for more than a few hours before dying horribly. I eventually traced the problem back to the Via chipset and the drivers for the old ATI graphics card I was using.

    Linux makes the system run much cooler, and the Kernel has workarounds for the issues with the Via chipset. I run a special build of X for the ATI card that also allows me to use the TV tuner.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
  73. Sun Announces New AMD-Based Product LIFE by qrash · · Score: 0

    or at least that's how I read it :)

    --
    you may find the Higgs in this signature.
  74. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As others have pointed out all problems you pointed out were not related to AMD.

    I have an AMD K-6 166 MHz; that I use everyday; that has been running for all intent 24/7 365 for about 2.5 years.

    It has been over-clocked to 200 MHz

    CPU cooling fan what is that? It died about a year ago. As a result CPU temps are high.

    Every so often I will power down and clean out the dust that has been sucked into the case by the power supply.

    I have reached the conclusion that I have not abused this CPU hard enough.

    I know I should replace it with something faster. I have decided to keep it until it dies.

    Perhaps anyone out there can give me ideas on how to abuse this poor computer harder so it finally gives up in its normal day to day processing.

    Once it dies I will take the slowest AMD system....demote every system I have, and go buy the newest AMD product.

  75. JVM 64 Bits + 64 Bit CPU = Improved Java Exec. by Woodie · · Score: 1

    Hey -

    just a guess, but as the JVM is generally a 64 bit VM (a lot of the numerical types are 64 bits in length) - I would imagine running on a native 64 bit platform will result in better performance. Instead of using 2 32 bit nuggets to store 64 bit values (not to mention the overhead needed to track which two 32 bit registers or memory blocks are storing it), the underlying physical CPU implementation more closely matches the registers and address space used inside the JVM.

    Just a guess.

    1. Re:JVM 64 Bits + 64 Bit CPU = Improved Java Exec. by memmel2 · · Score: 1

      More important for java is the fact that you don't use all 64 bits of a pointer for addressing allowing a number of bits to be set aside in pointers for intresting fast gc hacks.

  76. So when do we see a perf bakeoff:Opteron vs SPARC? by Glasswire · · Score: 1

    I suspect Sun will work very hard to keep people from comparing SPARC hardware with Opteron units, since the RISC systems will get killed.

    But Sun customers should insist on seeing this comparison.

  77. Free Linux distros with Opteron support? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Are there any free Linux distributions that have native 64-bit support for Opteron? All I know of are the SuSE/whatever Enterprise versions, with unclear licensing terms...

    1. Re:Free Linux distros with Opteron support? by ErixTr · · Score: 1

      Mandrake has in beta stage.

      http://www.mandrakelinux.com/en/92amd64beta.php3

      --
      less is more
  78. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
    B. AMD provides the specs for the chipsets TO the manuafacturers. Put on some glasses sometime and check out the name on the chipset. It'll say AMD.


    The name on my PC's chipset says "Via", yet the CPU is 850Mhz AMD Duron. How can this be?
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
  79. Likely to Sell Well by turgid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    They won't have much trouble out-selling itanium.

    This could be one of the final nails in itanic's coffin (or maybe the iceberg that finally sinks it.)

    When will Carly wield the axe? And what will intel do now?

    1. Re:Likely to Sell Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. AMD is always a few bad quarters away from disaster. In two years Opteron will be the cheap small-server alternative to "real" systems which run Itanium.

    2. Re:Likely to Sell Well by turgid · · Score: 1
      In two years Opteron will be the cheap small-server alternative to "real" systems which run Itanium.

      Ha ha ha ha he he he he he tee hee heee hee ho ho ho ho *splutter*.

      OK Mr or Ms AC, I'll hold you to those words.

      Ha ha ha ha ....

    3. Re:Likely to Sell Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, right. And itanium is always going to be the defacto industry standard manyana. Even Cray is avoiding it like the plague. If it really were any good, they'd have been using it already.

    4. Re:Likely to Sell Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Opteron is faster than Xeon at 2/3rds the clock speed.It scales to 8 way with no extra hardware (cf Xeon which can't scale past 2). It's a fraction of the price of itanic and cheaper than Xeon. It runs all your 32-bit code at full speed. It runs 64-bit code along side it. It runs cooler than Xeon or itanic. Why the hell would any one buy Xeon or itanic?

  80. Re:Sun is going to have a hard time... by 10Ghz · · Score: 1
    Your XP on the other hand is different. A lot higher clock speed, higher memory speed, a LOT more heat


    Did you know that comparable Intel-CPU's generate even more heat?. And with Athlon64 that difference is getting even bigger. Prescott is reported to generate over 100W of heat, while .09 micron Opterons hower around 50W.
    --
    Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.