Slashdot Mirror


The Problem Of Unused Cabling

Makarand writes "Technological advances constantly render functional cable obsolete by demanding data transfers at higher rates which older cabling cannot support. New cables that support higher data rates are laid right over older wires. The old wires are simply left in place and abandoned. This interesting article talks about the problems caused by abandoned cabling. According to an estimate several billion feet of abandoned cable lies unused in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard. Also, very few firms currently worry about removing cabling when they move out of a building."

64 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Cost to remove? by satyap · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

    1. Re:Cost to remove? by Interfacer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think it is safe to say that the hours you have to spend to remove all cabling are 100 times more expensive than the price you would get.

      "Hello sir, i have a few thousand feet of used cabling, you can have it for 5000$ OK?"

      kind regards,
      Interfacer.

    2. Re:Cost to remove? by Zocalo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe. Remember that the policy here was that the cabling was to be removed after each tennant left. That means it is simply a case of removing any cable from the duct, as opposed to removing just the defunct cables from a tangle of spaghetti. I suspect that the latter would require a considerable quantity of time, and therefore money, to accomplish.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    3. Re:Cost to remove? by mlush · · Score: 5, Informative
      Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

      Labour costs aside. I'd guess that (data) cabling is a pretty unattractive source of metals. Tons plastic would have to be burned to get to a useful amount of metal. Burning plastic produces all sorts of nasty compounds, which would have to be scrubbed from the emissions significantly boosting the costs.

    4. Re:Cost to remove? by The+Impossible · · Score: 2, Funny

      This depends on the amount.

      With my first boss we removed all cabling as the tiles didn't fit anymore. Selling the old cables funded:

      - the removal
      - replacing all BNC with CAT5 (in 1997)
      - a nice party for the company

      So it was worth the effort it took. (especially because the effort was limited to 'hey you, remove that junk' ;-))

      --
      ... Wenn ist das Nunstruck git und Slotermeyer? Ja!... Beiherhund das Oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    5. Re:Cost to remove? by Niggle · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Rather than try and salvage the metals from the cable, it would almost certainly be better to sell off the old cables as cables. Getting at the metal would involve getting rid of all the insulation etc. Selling them as cables means (at worst) putting new connectors on the ends.

      There might be legal issues preventing resale of some cables (toxic materials, fire regs. and so on).

      --
      - Blah blah blah, missing scientist. Blah blah blah, atomic bomb. -
    6. Re:Cost to remove? by idontgno · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Wonder how much it would cost to remove and recover the metals in unused cables, and would it be offset by the sale of the metal?

      Not nearly, if you factor in the cost of downtime caused by careless cable removal disrupting active cable in place. Beyond simple laziness, that's probably the reason I've seen the most for "It's not hurting anything, so just leave it in place."

      Our raised-floor facility across the hall from my office had 20 years worth of accumulated mainframe cabling, network cabling of three different Ethernet generations, and power cabling from 400 volt to 12vdc. And that's just the copper. Never mind three different kinds of fiber, 2 types of conduit, grounding cables (for the mainframe) complete with large ground planes glued to the subfloor, and several hundred serial cables (you know, DB-25 at each end).

      It's a miracle we had any uptime at all during the period when the system shop was removing all the dead copper.

      --
      Welcome to the Panopticon. Used to be a prison, now it's your home.
    7. Re:Cost to remove? by kriston · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The looters were taking the electrical wiring. It holds lots of nice, heavy copper that you can get good money for by weight.

      --

      Kriston

    8. Re:Cost to remove? by vartvart · · Score: 4, Insightful

      we recently completed a re-cabling job of over 130 drops. somewhere in the neighborhood of 4KM of cable was installed, and about the same was removed. our interconnect charged us about $2400 CAD to remove the old cable, and they did it on a weekend so as not to interrupt our employees.

      we've done this in a few areas in our building; removing the old cable each time at a marginal cost.

      we remove the old cable mainly because it looks aweful! we are in an old building with no walls in which to hide cables. ladder-racks are used to transport the cable and they would get overcrowded if we were to keep the old stuff around.

      what's the point of keeping old, solid-core, CAT5 around? some of it is so brittle that it literally breaks apart if you bend the cable!

      plus, our interconnect recycles the cable and gets a few buck back for the copper -- although not much from what i've been told.

    9. Re:Cost to remove? by robla · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you're after the metals, it's far more effective to granulate the cable, and then screen the output. No burning involved, and in many cases, the plastic coating can also be recycled. This is reasonably common practice, and it works pretty well.

    10. Re:Cost to remove? by N3Bruce · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Only part of the reason for the Iraqi stripping of cables was economic, as intact wire probably has value as intact wire in third world countries. Also, if someone can make even a couple of bucks over there for a couple of hours work, it is probably more profitable than the alternativess.

      Electrical wire is really the only common type of cabling that would be worthwhile by any stretch of the imagination that would be worth tearing out of a building. Also remember, that much of the looting was vandalism pure and simple done by people caught up in a fever of lawlessness.

      I had a reasonable quantity of old pitch and fabric covered #8 electrical wire, about 500 feet or so of the stuff that ran out to a barn here. I took it to the local recycler, who offered 3 cents a pound for it. 60 pounds of the stuff yielded a mere 2 bucks, which didn't even cover my gasoline to drive to the recycling center. I suspected there was at least 30 pounds of copper in there, which is worth about $25. but didn't want to go to the trouble and mess of burning the old insulation away. Proportionately, Cat 5 would be an even worse proposition, as there are probably mere grams of copper per foot of this cable. The heat of burning the plastic off of the cable would probably oxidize the little bit of copper it contains anyway.

      Some of the older 10 base 5 cables might have a second life for us ham radio operators, as it is equivalent to RG-8, a very common coaxial cable used in 2 way radio systems. Anybody who's got a few decent length runs (100 foot or so) of this stuff could get a few bucks for it at a hamfest. Don't bother with any oddball stuff, as it has little value for secondary uses.

    11. Re:Cost to remove? by uberdave · · Score: 2, Informative

      It's called a vampire tap, and I don't think it would have a significant effect on the signal carrying capacity of the cable.

  2. One good use by GeckoFood · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Several years ago, I took some of that old cabling and stripped out the copper wire. I then used that wire as the loop on fishing sinkers. Saved me a good $0.02 - $0.05 per sinker, and I got to go fishing all summer. Life's pretty good sometimes.

    --
    Be excellent to each other. And... PARTY ON, DUDES!
  3. Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The article mentions that it is now standard practice for companies leaving a building to cut the network/phone cabling just before they go.

    How damn stupid is that?? What else are they going to do, break the bloody windows?!

    1. Re:Cutting cabling by sjlutz · · Score: 5, Informative

      The standard practice is to recover assets when leaving a building. Just like a company takes it's servers, desktop computers, chairs, and desks, it also takes the relatively expensive network hook up equipment. This generally means the patch panels and the network racks. One rack, 6 or 7ft high, entirely populated with patch panels could easily have cost $4,000.

      Now, in some cases, people are jerks and do not take the time to cut the wires as close to the patch panels as possible. I have seen some cut where the wires enter the room (ussually through the ceiling). This makes re-using the wires impossible since there isn't enough left to do the hookups.

    2. Re:Cutting cabling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What else are they going to do, break the bloody windows?!

      Bill G already took care of that. :)

    3. Re:Cutting cabling by putaro · · Score: 4, Funny

      The logic being it's their cabling. The last startup I did, the previous tenants had done exactly that. The cabling was cut within about two feet of the ceiling. There was a bit of slack in the cables, though, and we were cheap, so we wound up with our patch panels right up at ceiling level. Saved us a bunch of time and money upfront though any work afterwards had to be done on top of a ladder.

    4. Re:Cutting cabling by xclr8r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Sure they can take the patch panels, but cutting the cables is rediculous. They can disconnect the telco connectors from the punch blocks and take their equipment (thus leaving the cabling intact).
      This cutting of cable sounds more like unscrupulous contractors at work.
      Money saved and resources usage reduced. The Planet will thank you

      --
      Beware of those who profit off the docile and persecute the unbelievers.
    5. Re:Cutting cabling by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 3, Informative

      We also take all of the locks with us, and the security system.

      This is simply an example of how businesses and individuals work quite differently in an area where people assume things are much the same. Businesses rent the space, not usually the facilities (ie phone, security, etc), so most of the phone equipment, including those lines they're cutting, were put in by the business, and are taken from place to place. For many people it's just not worth the effort to take the lines completely out, so cutting them is far more common, especially since re-using the line would be almost out of the question in the new building (though the new tenant of the old building could re-use the line if you don't cut it too close).

      We don't rent space expecting cat-5 cable to be in place, we rent it knowing that it will be easy for our people to put cat-5 in. We don't expect the phone line to be routed to the room we have designated for the phone equipment, or that the security will be up to our requirements.

      If it was a home bought and sold by an individual, you have to leave most of those things in place because the buyer expects them to be there. However, if you spell it out in the contract, you can still cut away the phone and cable for whatever reason, though, as an individual, you also expect those things to be in the place you're moving to (which, again, companies don't expect to find when they move into a new business space).

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    6. Re:Cutting cabling by Generic+Guy · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The standard practice is to recover assets when leaving a building.

      My wife just went through this. She moved from a small office to a bigger office, and we left the Cat-5 wiring and patch panels behind. We took the switches, but all the wall jacks and the patch panel stayed behind.

      The issue is what is considered to be "assets". The problem is many of these improvements could quite easily be considered "capital improvments" which need to stay with the property, even if you move out. I think wiring easily falls into this definition. As the article points out, some leases need modern language to more clearly include other items -- perhaps such as patch panels an termination blocks. If you run wiring and then mount a patch panel to the wall (or floor for the bigger ones) I don't think it's unreasonable for the landlord to want to keep it intact, just as if you were to, say, build a garage on the back lot.

      When old tenants cut wiring to unusable levels but leave it dangling through the walls like leftover trash, that could be a potential legal offense.

      --
      { - Generic Guy - }
    7. Re:Cutting cabling by Red_Harvest · · Score: 2, Funny
      What's ridiculious is that people on /. still haven't figured out how to spell that word properly.

      Yep, you said it :)

      Ridiculous - how hard can it be?

    8. Re:Cutting cabling by faedle · · Score: 3

      They mentioned one of the reasons in the article: concern that a competitor might be able to use the infrastructure.

      Unfortunately, building managers are usually part of the problem. Take this example of a startup I dealt with. We moved into a basement suite of a large office building in the center of town. The building management knew what our business was, knew we were likely to need telephone lines. But when we finally moved in, guess what? There was no cabling from our suite to the phone room. We had to install about 250 feet of plenum-rated phone wiring.

      Now, here's the problem. So, time comes for us to move to larger facilities. We were going to sell the cable as scrap. We ask for access to the common areas so we can retrieve the cable. Guess what? Building management now considers the cable "theirs" and won't provide us access to the phone room to remove it.

      What did we do? Sawed it off at the entrance to our suite. Why? Because the building management wouldn't either compensate us for the price of installing the cable nor allow us to remove it. We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw.

      Unfortunately, this is far more common than you'd believe. Building managers often look at high-tech companies as a cheap way to "update infrastructure" in older buildings without paying for it. In our case, the entire building, as a result of a lot of dot.com activity, now has fiber between floors, CAT-5 throughout, multiple electrical entries, etc. Who paid for all these upgrades? Not the building, that's for sure.

    9. Re:Cutting cabling by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2, Informative

      There was no cabling from our suite to the phone room. We had to install about 250 feet of plenum-rated phone wiring.

      Wow, that sucks. Wonder why they didn't have any cable installed?

      What did we do? Sawed it off at the entrance to our suite. Why? Because the building management wouldn't either compensate us for the price of installing the cable nor allow us to remove it. We paid for it, it's not theirs, so.. get out the hacksaw.

      Golly, do you think that the previous tenant might have done the same thing?

      Sorry, but that sort of scorched earth infrastructure policy is just stupid. Unless you were you actually planning on taking the cables with you to your next location and re-using them you should just leave them alone for the next person.

      If you put down new carpet or painted the walls, would your rip it all out and trash the place when you left, just out of spite?

  4. Fish by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've used old cabling to fish through the new cabling. I'm lazy like that.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
    1. Re:Fish by kriston · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've tried this. The old cables stretch and break. First the jacket stretches, then the copper stretches. When I'm done pulling I get to watch the copper slowly creep out of the ends of the cables while the jacket retracts back but the copper doesn't. It was really creepy in a dark attic the first time it happened.

      --

      Kriston

  5. creating a fire hazard? by Wonda · · Score: 2, Insightful
    allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard


    i'd think the cables block the airflow, rather than start it??
    1. Re:creating a fire hazard? by kilf · · Score: 3, Informative

      The real fire hazard is due to the insulation on the cables burning or melting and emitting all sorts of poisonous fumes. Older cables are very bad for this. I shudder at the thought of a serious fire in some of the buildings described by posters- if the whole floor void (and presumably the risers) are chock full of all that plastic.

      *Some* modern cables are rated LSZH or LS0H- meaning "Low Smoke Zero Halogen" which shows that cable firms are considering this issue.

    2. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, "plenum spaces" are supposed to have plenum cable, according to fire code. Plenum cable doesn't burn, it just smolders.

      If that's what you meant by "inflammable," sorry. The word is "nonflammable."

    3. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Overzeetop · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Which is why building codes require special jacketed cables for use un plenum spaces (ie: plenum rated). If you install non-rated cables in the plenum space you are breaking the law, and could be liable to future tenants for remove of the non-complying cabling. Yes, that fact is usually ignored since nobody pulls a building permit when retrofitting low-voltage cabling and therfor there's no inspector to make sure it is done correctly (or, at least, to code).

      As a structural engineer, I deal with folks every day who do things "wrong" but they've never had a building fall down. I call it Luck, as defined by the myriad little things which don't have any reproducable/quantifiable strucutral value which - in the real world - tend to help out a bit (friction, drywall screws, adhesive on gun-nails, etc.). Combine that with safety factors approaching 3 and the rarity for a building to see a code-required load (usu. less than 2% chance per year) and builders and owners get away with a lot of $#!+.

      The fact is that the actual danger is fairly low, but when it's your family member that get's turned into medium steak - crispy on the outside with a warm red center - suddenly the $50,000 to remove the cabling seems like a small price to pay (and would have been a small price compared to the settlement or jury award).

      Well, I didn't mean for this to sound so gloom-and-doom. Remember that crispy human with gypsum and ash crust requires multiple failures - bad/blocked exits, non- or sub-functioning alarm and fire supression, ignition source, flammables. Keep your buildings well maintained and you can handle a bit of non-compliance.

      --
      Is it just my observation, or are there way too many stupid people in the world?
    4. Re:creating a fire hazard? by line.at.infinity · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If that's what you meant by "inflammable," sorry. The word is "nonflammable."

      When I said "inflammable," I meant "inflammable," not "nonflammable." I'm so sorry that you are dead wrong on that one.

      According to the article, not some fire code, the cables can be toxic under fire. I was hazarding a guess that what the author wanted to say was that the cable was inflammable, but I might be wrong. The author should have explained what s/he meant by that. If the old cables are a fire hazard now, weren't they a fire hazard when first installed? How does the fact that they are old cables make them more dangerous? What is the problem now and what were the regulational loopholes that created the current state?

    5. Re:creating a fire hazard? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think (firefighting and telecom) (training and experience) trump one misinformed article. The insulation on plenum cable does not "burn" in an "inflammable" sense, but id does smolder. (Meaning that it still combusts, but it's much too slow to provide visible flame.)

      Unfortunately, the cumbustion does produce toxic smoke, but that's true of nearly all general cumbustion. We don't completely understand pyrolisis in the "real world" yet, so producing a product whose smoke is non-toxic is an empiracle persuit, at best.

      There are important points in the article, though. The one that strikes me first is airflow blockage. In fires, there are times when you don't want to ventilate an area, and times when you do. Airflow blockage prevents gases from reaching some places. While this is bad if you need oxygen (for a human), it could be good in the sense that the hot gasses from the fire may not penetrate the building as quickly. (HVAC systems are notorious for that.)

    6. Re:creating a fire hazard? by dcviper · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For shipboard installs, The US Navy requires Kevlar jacketed CAT5 vice the more common PVC (PolyvinylCHLORIDE) as PVC releases chlorine gas when burned.

      On a side note, when they decomissioned the USS Connstellation (CV-64) a 10'x 10' cable junction between the island and rest of the ship below the flight deck(03 level, i think, i heard this second hand) was completely filled with 40 years worth of all manner of cabling (phones, comms, radar, power) that no more cable could be run through that conduit. My roomate estimated that about 85% of the cable was dead.

      --
      Ummm, err, say what, now?
  6. Passing the buck... by danielrm26 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is one of those situations where it's just so *easy* to not take responsibility. I think the final solution in the article is best -- require a fairly large deposit when people move in, on top of requiring them to pay to install and remove the cable they use. If they don't remove it for whatever reason, you just take it out of their deposit.

    This is the most logical way to handle the problem, but it puts the business using this method at a disadvantage becuase they are possibly requiring higher deposits than competitors.

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
  7. Taking the article is already /.'ed by rf0 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I can't RTFM so I will just say that if you look at some of the mess that companies actually leave such as old cat5 cables 1/2 hanging out the walls as well as some of the under floor.

    I did work at a DC once where to lay in new cable under the floor you had to physically have someone to push other cables aside so you could get another cable in. There was meant to be 3 ft of room between the tiles and the concrete floor. IT was all full of cables.

    They had a lot of downtime as each time your moved one cable it ended becoming disconnected from the switch or the machine. Soon went bust

    Rus

  8. Hours? Seconds more like.. by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny
    .. if you take a lesson from the BOFH school of thought.

    1. Feed loose end of cable out of building, into carpark.
    2. Attach cable to axel of bosses car, and forge email from CEO's wife saying she wants him now.
    3. Watch boss drive off at great speed.
    4. ?????
    5. Profit.

    1. Re:Hours? Seconds more like.. by thynk · · Score: 5, Funny

      4 is pretty simple in this one...

      4. Charge for 40 hours of "out of hours" work at the standard double overtime rate for both you and the PFY. Mark on timesheet as "Removal of Fire Hazard Material"

      --

      Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  9. Space.... by hughk · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The main thing about the older networks in particular was that the cables need space, lots of it and ducts get kind of full quickly.

    Removing cable can be a little tricky (you don't really want to put new strain on the production cables), but it is generally recyclable which can pay for the operation. However, if you start removing things, you had better make sure that the cables are tagged.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
  10. Not so sure by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't know if I really believe this article all that much. A couple years back, at the place I work (*cough* will be unemployed from after Wednesday), they upgraded the network to CAT-6 and three times the ports. That meant they had to rewire the entire front office cubefarm, which is two stores with a 6" subfloor each, and wiring columns running between stories.

    When all those cables converge on a wiring closet, they start to get bundled up pretty high. There's almost no room to run additional cables, plus it would be a huge unsightly mess. We hired an outside contractor to do the job, so they did professional work and disposed of the old wiring. They almost had to...with a 6" subfloor, you either pull cables through with the old wiring, or rip up every single carpet square and floor tile. I can't imagine this situation being much different for other companies.

    --
    ...
  11. You think unused cabling is a problem... by rodney+dill · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the problem of used cabling.

    --

    Use your head, can't you, use your head,
    You're on earth, there's no cure for that
    - S. Beckett
  12. Re:Moving out by Ronald+Dumsfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Leaving ethernet points in = $0

    Unfortunately, when the tenant moves out they're going to want to take all their switching equipment with them. That leaves a load of loose wires which may or may not be labelled.

    Come time to use wiring in an office you have to search through bundles of cables to find the ones you want. If the cable you find doesn't work you're left wondering if it's incorrectly labelled and comes out somewhere else, or is simply broken. If it's broken you've got the expense of laying in replacements, if it's mislabelled you've an expensive analysis job to undertake.

    So, no, using someone else's second-hand wiring is not zero cost.

    --
    Where's the Kaboom?
    There's supposed to be an Earth-shattering Kaboom.
  13. Fire Codes by shepd · · Score: 5, Informative

    Any place with a decent set of fire codes, and people who are actually following them, shouldn't be worrying. FT-5/Plenum cable is simply not a danger.

    Now, if residential "wood burns faster so who cares" FT-1 vinyl cable is used, you get what you pay for. That being said, if the fire inspector ever sees that stuff, you'll probably be looking at a really juicy fine.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  14. Electricians to the rescue by WillRobinson · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just put a sign out front, Free Cable.
    I guarantee you will get some electrician come pull every piece out. And it will not cost you a dime.

    1. Re:Electricians to the rescue by karnal · · Score: 2, Funny

      But does it have HBO?

      --
      Karnal
  15. Re:Moving out by PickyH3D · · Score: 2, Informative

    He was saying that for the company/person leaving it is zero cost. Businesses do not care about the company moving into the building afterwards and why would they? For you all know a competitor is moving in. If it's mislabelled then you can just rip everything out and start over. Why waste the money analyzing when you can spend less pulling it out and putting new stuff in?

  16. Cost of removing cable by masoncooper · · Score: 3, Insightful

    When our office decided to re-cable we were told by the building that we couldn't pull new cable unless we removed all the old cable. It turns out the previous tenants had re-cabled at least three times before. We were initially quoted tens of thousands of dollars to have it removed but finally found a contractor who would remove it all for just a few thousand. As it turns out he had horribly underestimated the job and upon completion, expressed to us how much he had under-quoted us but still held to his quote.
    All in all, having pre-existing wiring is a double-edged sword. New tenants might like the idea of saving on cabling and such, but also can come back and bite you when it comes time to upgrade.

  17. Dont buildings come with services over there? by carndearg · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Judging by my several employers over the last few years the norm here in the UK for newer office space at least is that the building is put up with structured cabling already in place. This is usually cat.5, which happily takes care of any network or phone cabling requirements. This is seen as a major selling point for the office so the landlord is happy to provide it.
    It surprises me that landlords over there do not take the same view, though it is possible that there is some liability question under US law of which I am unaware.

    We are not without our cabling problems here though, my first job was at a major university, in a 1930s building. The original rubber insulated telephone cables were disused but still in place, and they had coagulated into a malevolent black mass in the risers and cable ducts. I am told they have now been removed, I pity the poor people who had to do it, they must have had to cut them out with an angle grinder.

    1. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by swb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Some newer office spaces geared towards very small businesses (5-10 people) often have "built-in" networking and phone services. You get your own LAN, internet access, and phone service for some add-on price to your monthly rent.

      The problem with this model is that really requires that the building's office layout be fairly static. Many US office buildings, especially the larger ones, are huge empty spaces, made up mainly of cubicles, and even the "real" offices are made of modular partition panels. Since the layout is modular, the network generally can't come with the building.

      And even if the old tenant had wiring roughly where you wanted it to be (give or take an extra long drop cable), the cabling is often not up to any standard, poorly labeled, badly done, etc etc.

      A lot of building managers *are* hard-assed when it comes to riser space. Our Cal office must use just one riser tech, which is a nightmare when you're trying to schedule telco, a system vendor, and the offical riser techs in one day. Getting one to show up on time is a miracle, three?

    2. Re:Dont buildings come with services over there? by ces · · Score: 2, Informative

      It surprises me that landlords over there do not take the same view, though it is possible that there is some liability question under US law of which I am unaware.

      It really depends on the particulars of the tennant and building owner.

      With smaller spaces the company moving in or the building owner will often pay a departing tennant to leave network and phone cabling in place along with things like furniture and phone switches. In sublease situations it's not uncommon for the master tennant to require the subleasing tennant to leave things like walls and wiring alone.

      --
      Happy Fun Ball is for external use only.
  18. Interplanetary network by lplatypus · · Score: 3, Funny
    According to an estimate several billion feet of abandoned cable lies unused in the plenum spaces of buildings that allow air to circulate creating a fire hazard.

    Several billion feet? That's not long enough to reach Mars even when it came really close recently: it was still over 180 billion feet away.

    Nevertheless, there is plenty of cable for making a link to the moon, which is merely about 1.3 billion feet from Earth. Of course, one may need quite a few bridges along the way to keep the signal alive and deal with the variety of recycled cable types :-) Also, the cable may need to be attached to one of the earth's poles to avoid getting wrapped around the earth by the moon's rotation.

    Wow, a cable to the moon would be quite an amazing feat of engineering. Do you think it may be remotely possible?

  19. Some states actually have laws about this... by Iphtashu+Fitz · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know that here in Massachusetts the state laws require contractors to remove unused cable from plenums, raised floors, etc. when doing any renovation that involves those spaces. As was explained to me by one contractor the primary reason is the toxic gasses that can be released by PVC & other plastic coatings when they catch fire. Apparently contractors can be fined if they don't remove unused cables. This actually caused a problem at one place where I worked - we had 3/4 of a floor in a renovated office and the other 1/4 was vacant. When that space was leased out it was rebuilt and one day in the middle of the construction all our network connections on the walls between our space and this other space suddenly stopped working. The contractors incorrectly assumed that these were old cables so they ripped them out. Needless to say they ended up paying to have new cables run, but that took a couple days...

  20. Give it away. . . by bplipschitz · · Score: 3, Informative

    The right cabling makes perfect feedline for HF radio applications. I removed well over 300 feet of Twinax from the building I work in, and I could take all I wanted for free. [I now feed a 40-meter dipole with it]. The loss characteristics are about the same is RG-8.

    All you amateur radio operators/SWL'ers, offer to remove the stuff for free.

    One caveat, it is really dirty work, depending upon the building.

  21. outsource cabling ? by Cedric+C.+Girouard · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In montreal, we have quite a few buildings where several companies are installed, and when it comes to cabling, you just can not install anything yourself. You rent the space, you rent the lines.

    You need a new drop ? No problem, a contractor is on site to install them, label them, keep track of them.

    It can lead to some pretty conflicts, but overall, when you get used to the fact that your responsability ends at the wall jack, it's a pretty good way to relieve us IT guys from one of the most boring area of the job.

    --

    Marriage is considered capital punishment for the theft of a goat in some third world countries...

  22. Some Thoughts from an Expert... by lonb · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I used to run an ISP that was owned by a real estate firm. We wired many buildings in NYC and provided additional services, such as wiring tenant offices and providing Internet access. There are several considerations not pointed out here:

    A. Limitation of Knowledge. The guys who do a lot of the wiring work don't know what the cables do -- believe it or not. My two most experienced, and best, pullers couldn't tell you what ethernet was if their life depended on it. Heck, I had one guy who didn't know what T568b was, but could punch down Cat5 to a T568b block in five seconds flat. All they knew was what they were told to install.

    In the past I had specifically had discussions with them about pulling cables out. Unless they are explicitly directed by the landlord of the building (who knows even LESS than they do) they will not, and probably should not, touch cables that are pre-existing. This is due to fear of not knowing what they could be doing, and worse, what they are, or aren't, doing.

    B. Cross-office runs. In one of my buildings, for example, each floor was an average of 12,500 feet. The average office was 800 sq. ft. Most floors had upwards of 10-12 offices on them. In order to get riser pulls (cabling run in the central, vertical risers of the building) to office drops (termination points for those cables), these typically ran over the other offices. It was typical for the first office, closest to the riser) to have anywhere from 20-40 cables running through their plenum cores that had nothing to do with that office.

    Imagine you come in Monday morning, after a neighbor moved in that weekend, to find all your cabling (data, phone, cable TV, leased lines) had be removed by the overly eager data people.

    C. Simple CBA. The bottomline for any real estate firm is, well, the bottomline. The risk of fire due to overly full cabling space is fairly minimal compared to the risk of losing money and facing lawsuits -- or worse, losing tenants.

    The cost of pulling existing cabling plus the risk of damaging infrastructure minus the value of open space is just not in the favor of making the change. It's really that simple.

    When all is said and done, with my engineering cap on, I'd like to see thorough documentation on cables and better diagrams of floors showing what cable goes where -- and it's really not that hard. But try telling a rushing tenant that they have to wait two weeks while your engineering team documents cables, yeah right.

    Also, with my engineering cap on, I'd make one suggestion for anyone moving into a new office. If you are going to pull out the old cables, and it is in roughly strong strength, use it to snake your new cables! That's what we often did. There are a few snares with this trick to watch out for, but if you have good pullers they'll know what to do -- if you give them the green light.

    --
    "Ain't I a stinka..." - Bugs
    1. Re:Some Thoughts from an Expert... by philtre · · Score: 2

      Good comment. I occasionally end up pulling cable with the company we subcontract for cable runs. I have NEVER seen them remove cable. Simply because of the reason you stated. They don't know which to remove. If it were a case of removing all the cable, sure they'd do that. But 98% of the time the runs are being made to add to existing networks. I've never looked into it, but I've always been told (when I asked why we don't remove the unused ancient cabling) that it's not worth the time you pay the guys to pull it out. Maybe some of the earlier comments about electricians salvaging it are true in some areas, but here in Houston, I've never heard of that occuring. Only time cabling gets removed from any of my customer's sites is for a full remodel/renovation or fairly lengthy build-out.

      philtre

  23. Disposal deposits by dpilot · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've considered this idea more generally in the past... paying a 'disposal fee' up-front on new goods to pay for their end-of-life costs. There are two problems with this idea:

    1: Technology changes, and those end-of-life costs are going to change, sometimes up, sometimes down. This in itself isn't a terrible problem, but it couples into problem 2.

    2: Disposal escrow would wind up creating some huge lumps of money. IMHO, whenever there's a huge lump of money, there's also a class of people who will find a way to attach themselves to it and start sucking it dry. In other words, that lump will never survive to do what it was supposed to do - pay disposal costs. Relative to item 1, someone (from that class) will find a 'new technology' to handle disposal and use the fund to develop that new technolgy. Maybe it'll work, maybe not, but odds are that the point will have been to gain access to the money, not to develop technology. Let's presume that 50% of the time the technology falls through, and the money's gone. We're right back where we started, only with a broken promise and either an environmental mess or the need for another government bailout.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
  24. Fire codes can fix this by Wansu · · Score: 2, Informative


    As soon as this issue appears on the radar screens of fire marshalls, it will be dealt with. Restricting air flow in the plenums and having materials which emit toxic fumes during combustion in suspended ceilings would get most firemen wound up.

    --
    Wansu, th' chinese sailor
  25. Not universal practice by mwood · · Score: 2, Interesting

    We actually had a flag day, a few years ago, when a load of new comm. gear came in. The comm. guys spent days pulling up several layers of old cable 'cos they needed the space for the new. It made working under the floor much nicer. Now if we could get the power guys to stop laying 100kg of copper on top of our phone and data cables.... (Yeah, a structured wiring plan would help.)

    And whenever I retire a cable, or find that some less industrious person has abandoned one, I pull it up *now* before it becomes part of a mat that's too much to deal with. It's a great way to be productive late on Friday afternoon when you don't want to touch production software just before the weekend. But then, I actually fasten the holddown screws on connector shells, too, so I'm obviously a fringe nutcase. :-|

  26. Code Compliance by virg_mattes · · Score: 2, Informative

    > The problem I faced was, what about when you have to do both? (Run a distance on one floor, then go up to another floor and run a fair distance in another air space.) Either way you are breaking code somewhere.

    If you don't want to break code, you split the cable at the turns, and use plenum for the floor runs and a section of riser cable for the floor change. Yes, it's inconvenient, but building codes are rarely written with convenience in mind. So, in a word, you don't use one long cable for that whole run.

    Virg

  27. The solution to this is easy by iphayd · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There should be some legislation that makes it illegal to cut the lines without removing them completely. When you vacate a space, the wiring should either be useable or gone.

  28. Pfff....fire hazards are everywhere. by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2, Insightful
    It is estimated that 60 billion feet of cable have been abandoned in the plenum spaces that allow air circulation through a building, creating a fire hazard. Older cable could be particularly toxic in a fire.

    I like how the article pushes the "fire hazard" angle, but doesnt' bother to look at which cabling, specifically, is the problem. It portrays it as a problem caused by companies installing network/phone wire recently, when the real problem wire is much older. Most new wire installed by knowledgeable installers is plenum rated-- which means it's self-extinguishing and not nearly as toxic when burned. The nastiest-burning wire you'll find in ceilings is the old pink-beige jacketed 25-200 pair phone cabling that was installed forty years ago by Ma Bell! What's more, much of this nasty multipair wire can't be pulled out because it's still being used. On top of it all, the toxic-fire hazard posed by wiring in the plenum space is miniscule compared to the nasty plastic crap that's in an office itself-- if there's a fire, that cheap desk chair burning is gonna put out nastier smoke than a bundle of cabling. Also, plenum air doesn't generally get pumped into anyone's office. Plenum spaces are used as return-air systems, so any smoke in there is going primarily into the building's air shaft, where it will set off a smoke detector that sends the air out a roof vent rather than back into the building.

    Don't get me wrong, as a network cabling installer I'm all for the removal of old cable. I've seen cable trays so packed with old crap that I couldn't get another run through. But the need of some people to pose every problem as a dire safety hazard drives me up a tree. I'm willing to bet that there are very few buildings where the communications wiring is even one of the top five fire-safety hazards.

    --
    If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  29. Re:Electrical Code by coldnight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When I ripped out my Romex (steel covered cable) it was quite nasty... however, we had the drywall all down and pulled the plaster & lath down too so it was quite easy to see where things were sticking. Alot of the cable was cut in many places and removed from around the staples.

    You will need to check with a local person as the codes vary all over the country.. not everyone enforces the NFPA rules or adopts them as local ordinances. Fire code in the US is a massive mess... thus we have the highest fire fatality rate in the civilized world...

  30. Re:Plenum vs riser cable by pbrammer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    According to the NEC 2002 ed, section 800.53(A) states that, "Abandoned cables shall not be permitted to remain." Section 800.53(B)(1) states the same thing. So, abandoned cables in plenum & riser spaces MUST be removed according to the NEC. Your local jurisdiction might have something different to say, but that's what's written in the NEC.

    Since that's cleared up now, I can move on to your question, "...what about when you have to do both."

    Section 800.53(G) & Table 800.53 state that you can substitue cable type CMP (communications plenum) for type CMR (communications riser). You CANNOT substitute CMR for CMP though.

    So, the layman's answer to your question is to run type CMP when you have both situations.

    Phil

  31. An Idea Just in time for Xmas! by Dolemite_the_Wiz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Take all the unused cabling and thread unused AOL Trial CD's and you have yourself a great way to trim that Tree!

    Dolemite
    ________________

    --
    Save the World! Use a Quote!
  32. Cat5 may be worthless but lead piping is good by steve_l · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in an old house (1840), in the UK, and when we had the floors up we found lead piping for gas lighting, which was the premium source of light before electicity came along.

    After admiring the historical quaintess of century and a half old technology, we pulled it up and sold it for enough to cover some of the costs of the woodwork repairs, then laid down CAT5 (attenuation in stone is atrocious, especially for 802.11a, so CAt5 is the backbone).

    I hope in another 150 years someone will find the cat5 wiring and find it equally quaint, as they laugh at 100mbit bandwidth and IPv4 net addresses. At least I hope so -as I doubt they will find as much resale value in the wires as we did in the lead pipes.