Slashdot Mirror


Doom 3 - Definitely Worth The Wait?

Thanks to 1UP for their borderline-gonzo article discussing how the extended wait for Doom 3 is affecting opinions of it. The naysaying author of the piece argues that id's FPS sequel "...possesses many appreciable graphical highlights, [but] much of its beauty comes from techniques that are rapidly becoming standards. Normal mapping and dynamic lighting are nothing new, and companies like Ion Storm Austin and Crytek are proving that anyone can do it." He goes on to stake out his position clearly: "I am certain Doom will be great fun for what it is, but I just don't know if fans of the original and its Serious [Sam] inspiring style will dig something paced so radically different. I am also unsure of whether or not action gamers... will buy into a title that seems to lack the excessive fiction, approachability and interactivity that drive practically all of today's modern games." Update: 11/27 17:18 GMT by S : There's also a new mini-interview with John Carmack regarding Doom 3 over at CGW.

68 comments

  1. lack the excessive fiction! by m0rphin3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm all for it!
    I'm fed up with games that 'feature' horrible acting, crappy FMV and hackneyed, generic stories.
    Bring on the frag-fest!

    --
    for great justice
    1. Re:lack the excessive fiction! by bugbread · · Score: 2, Informative

      Except that word on the street is that it isn't going to be a fragfest. It seems it will go more for the Biohazard approach of spookyness...which is problematic, as Doom is all about the superfragging.

      Personally, I'm more worried that their screenshots include spider enemies...I just can't help imagining the game being full of crates and colored keycards.

    2. Re:lack the excessive fiction! by Tralfamadorian · · Score: 1

      OOOOO colored keycards! I hear they're adding new colors for this version. Gotta put that GeFxPlus card to use for something I guess.

    3. Re:lack the excessive fiction! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll.

    4. Re:lack the excessive fiction! by KewlPC · · Score: 1

      Umm, what? Doom was all about atmosphere. At least, Episode I was.

  2. Blah blah by Txiasaeia · · Score: 1
    At this ppint, I could care less about Doom3. KOTOR and Deus Ex 2 (demo) is occupying my time.

    In 2012, when the game actually comes out, ask me again.

    --
    Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    1. Re:Blah blah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean you *like* the Deus Ex 2 demo? Whatever you're smoking, I want some of it.

    2. Re:Blah blah by macdaddy357 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't now what's up with you, but I just can't wait for the power gaming bundle of Doom 3 and Duke Nukem Forever! I'm holding my breath in anticipation.

      --
      How ya like dat?
  3. If you want the best graphics, buy a movie! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    For fucks sake. Anyone who thinks shadow maps are what will make or break this game is a fucking idiot.

    1. Re:If you want the best graphics, buy a movie! by rf_incorporated · · Score: 1

      All the more so because said fucking idiot doesn't realize that Doom 3 doesn't even use shadow maps.

  4. Another FPS by jnguy · · Score: 1

    Well, I personally am looking forward to DOOM3, simply because its so pretty, but then again so is HL2. The market is being flooded with "Great" FPS. I personally play FPS on consoles, because I'm really bad with keyboard and mouse, however, both of there are supposed to come out for the xbox. Things that will make or break doom3 include how fast people catch on. On XBL, initially, I wasn't planning to buy Rainbow Six, but then all of a sudden all my GR and GRIT friends were playing it, so I naturally had to buy it and play along. Just my 2 cents.

  5. I disagree with 'excessive fiction' by hookedup · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I am also unsure of whether or not action gamers... will buy into a title that seems to lack the excessive fiction, approachability and interactivity that drive practically all of today's modern games.

    While these 'fictional' shooters are indeed fun, I've found myself quite taken with games like Call of Duty, and Battlefield 1942 whereas i used to be into Half Life, Gore, Doom, etc.. I seem play these types of games to put myself in the shoes (boots) of those that actually went to war, and less and less about just killing things.

    Maybe it's just me getting a little older...who knows..

    1. Re:I disagree with 'excessive fiction' by ziggy_zero · · Score: 1

      No, it's just that there are more of these realistic "war" games now then ever. I personally still enjoy shooting aliens with laser guns more than being in a war, and I consider myself more mature than my roommate who plays Call of Duty and listens to Linkin Park all day.

      Maybe it's just my hatred of war in general...

      --
      I belong to the ______ generation.
    2. Re:I disagree with 'excessive fiction' by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whoa there, watch that first step when you get off that horse it's rather hight.

  6. How did this make it here? by Shiifty · · Score: 3, Interesting
    To the front page? Its just two punks bickering back and forth about how good/bad Doom3 will be compared to other games, and doesn't give any insight into the game.

    I was a fan of the original Doom series, but hadn't played many FPS games since then (except a bit of Quake). I'm eagerly awaiting Doom3, which will finally force me into upgrading my 1999 Rage Pro video card!

    1. Re:How did this make it here? by simoniker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      FWIW, this wasn't posted on the front page - you must have sections collapsed. It's a Games-specific post.

      I'm excited about Doom, but I am a little worried about how the story will get integrated in there - previous id games aren't generally very story-rich. Maybe it doesn't matter, as long as the gameplay's all there, though.

    2. Re:How did this make it here? by bmorton · · Score: 1

      From what I understand, and that could indeed be very limited, it's not so much story-rich as trying to create a really creepy experience.

      After playing that beta that got released a while back...I can say that it's probably going to be really good at that.

      *thinks about a bathroom mirror*

  7. Any truth to the rumor.. by Liquidrage · · Score: 3, Funny

    that the the retail version of Doom 3 will include a playable mini-game version of Daikatana?

    All kidding aside, the games been in development for too long. It will allmost be impossible to live up to the expectations that only grow as the game sits in development for what seem like forever.

    1. Re:Any truth to the rumor.. by rbanzai · · Score: 5, Funny

      There was a playable version of "Daikatana"?

    2. Re:Any truth to the rumor.. by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      If I follow your logic, then if DooM3 sucks, then I fear a lot for Team Fortress 2, and my heart may skip a beat or two when we finally get Duke Nukem Forever. :p

  8. maybe so and maybe not by August_zero · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When people tell me doom3 is going to suck, or rock I tell them the same thing I tell them when they try and convince me that Halo2 is the best game ever made: Wait until you play it. If I went by only the opinions of people who are rating games and movies on their hype alone I would be convinced that the last two StarWars films were the best in the series.

    I am thinking that at this point, writing a negative opinion of doom3 is just a quick cheap way of getting your article read and talked about, rather than a thoughtful well written article if I talk smack people will swarm; the cynic in me continues to get a thorough workout daily.

    --
    On Wall Street they say "buy low, sell high" On the pad we say, "buy high, sell high" Isn't that somehow better?
    1. Re:maybe so and maybe not by DrEldarion · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Exactly. At this point, technology is at the point where pretty much any game released by a major company is going to be spectacularly beautiful. Because of this (thank god), games are going to have to go back to having good gameplay (instead of just pretty graphics) in order to sell well.

      Who cares if the graphics are OMG SO BEAUTIFUL if the game is boring as hell? Doom has always been FUN, and that is what kept me playing, not the pretty visuals.

    2. Re:maybe so and maybe not by imr · · Score: 1

      I agree 100% with you but there is one area where technology matters, it's when it mixes with gameplay.
      Add 3D to graphics or tcp/ip to personal computers and you get new types of gameplay. Now, the nice 3d of quake3 doesnt give much new to the genre. But, this new shadow engine could give one interresting gameplay: to play in almost dark places. Think multiplayer "Thief".
      I'd like to try that.
      On the other hand, it will be a new nice way to get blind too.

    3. Re:maybe so and maybe not by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmmmmmm Multiplayer thief..... drool...

      A stealth based multiplayer game where people actually are stealthy instead of camping or just running around jumping like chimps on speed? You cruel bastard, making me covet and hope for things that I will never live to see.

    4. Re:maybe so and maybe not by danila · · Score: 1

      We were excited about game graphics for a long time now. Even Quake 2 was visually great with coloured lightning and stuff. Unreal was visually stunning, with large open spaces, cool level design, great-looking lakes and waterfalls, and stuff. Max Payne was amazing with photorealistic textures, models, etc. Basically every major game was visually stunning in some way. The level of hype about Half-Life 2 and Doom 3 is only moderately higher than usually and can be explained by both games being announced and shown quite a time before they are ready. The unique features of these two engines are basically facial animations and per-pixel lightning. Everything else is already used in games you can buy today. If we are to believe the scientists, there is a big drop in our perception of computer-generated humans as realistic right before complete realism. Supposedly, we don't like characters that look "almost right", like characters in Final Fintasy (the movie). If this is so, then there will always be demand for more realism, until we can simulate reality 100% and more. So don't expect games to ignore the eye-candy and return to "good old times" of fun and good gameplay.

      BTW, the most visually stunning game currently in development is neither Doom 3, nor Half-Life 2. It is Stalker. It also has by far the most realistic levels in an FPS, dynamic weather system (really cool), and (supposedly) very large levels, great story, great AI, great gameplay. It also has the usual (now) things like rag-doll physics, advanced dynamic lightning and shadows, cool shader effects, etc. It is also the first game about Chernobyl. ;)

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  9. Um.. by Naikrovek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I played the leaked alpha, and I loved it. It scared the crap out of me, and half the monsters weren't even 'activated', and didn't attack.

    no one who has played the alpha would bicker about it. those of us who have, know how good it can potentially be.

  10. Waitin' for the game, not the sugar by thirty2bit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm waiting for the game, not for the lastest post-pixel shader rendered, anisoaliased particulate-scatter, a-b-c-x-y-z buffered with quantum-fog-table correlated, hyperradiused bump-mapped picocanvased effects.

    All of the latest greatest effects don't mean diddly if you don't have a game and a story behind it.

    Otherwise all you have is lipstick and makeup on a pig. Usually, with bad voice-acting to boot.

    I would much rather see Doom 3 and Half Life 2 be released as polished accomplishments, not as graphic effect demos.

    1. Re:Waitin' for the game, not the sugar by Dr+Reducto · · Score: 1

      "I would much rather see Doom 3 and Half Life 2 be released as polished accomplishments, not as graphic effect demos."

      So you mean, not like Xbox games?

  11. I do wait for doom3 by imr · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Because the pleasure i discovered with doom was not it's frantic action. This existed already with many old arcade games. I don't expect frantic multiplayer action either, because i have plenty of that available already.
    What really differenciated doom was the intense fear i felt when I had to turn a corner and was hearing those breathing sounds.
    Then multiplayer was brought to the games. Now, i expect doom3 to bring that creepy feeling into multiplayer games and i believe "no splash damage" are the right guys to do it. Gimme multiplayer in the dark baby!

    1. Re:I do wait for doom3 by Aelfy · · Score: 1

      Take my advice, try Aliens Vs. Predator 1/2. Brown trouser time, my friend. You are really missing out if you think Doom is the only FPS that can provide scares.

    2. Re:I do wait for doom3 by imr · · Score: 1

      indeed. I havent tried the second one yet (doesnt work under linux), but the first one was really great. At least the first missions as marine were terribly scarry. Then it gets more on the "regular" fps side.
      Brown trouser time you bet! I played the first mission with the fingers clutched on fire and screaming everytime anything was popping out. Then I left the game for the rest of the day. Some friend made fun of me and I made him tried the game. It was a delight to watch him scream and add some insightfull(+1) comments about his courage.

    3. Re:I do wait for doom3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've played AVP1 and 2. Yes they are scary, yes doom was scary when it came around. I'm telling you though, doom3 will make you crap your pants. That is all.

  12. engine by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm waiting for it to be released so the engine can be licensed. Not a knock on Doom or Quake, but it usually turns out a licensee makes a better 'game' than the original game.

    1. Re:engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's funny how people manage to extrapolate the incident of Half-Life/the Quake engine to the assumption that id Software only makes good engines and that other companies make good games. Come on. Doom was an awesome game design-wise. As was Quake. And Quake II. And Quake III is still the best game using its engine.

    2. Re:engine by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1
      I'm not saying that Id doesn't make good games. I'm saying that they usually don't innovate in the gameplay design area.

      I'd take any of the new Wolfenstein, Medal of Honor or Battlefield games over Quake III any day of the week.

    3. Re:engine by aliens · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure Battlefield isn't based on Q3's engine. IIRC it's a totally new one made by EA.

      Call of Duty on the other hand is based on a heavily modified Q3 engine.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
    4. Re:engine by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      The new Wolfenstein is made using the Quake III engine...

      Saying that id software usually doesn't innovate the gameplay area is like saying the Ford Motor company doesn't usually innovate the assembly line everytime they build a new factory. Theres a reason why innovation sometimes comes far and between.

    5. Re:engine by SophtwareSlump · · Score: 1
      Right, I know it's hard to keep innovating, hence the term innovation :)

      The only Id games that I've purchased (as far as I know) are Doom, Doom 2 and Heretic. I never purchased any of the Quake games. To me, it seemed like Unreal was innovating more in gameplay and game modes and those kept my interest.

    6. Re:engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid beatch. You know what, don't even get me started with Unreal. I would never purchase Unreal unless it was with someone elses money. My computer, it plays Q3. It doen not play Unreal... So, in closing, that means that my computer is not good enough to play it. But you can bet your ass that I'll be buying a new computer when doom3 comes out. ID games has helped me make every buying descion for the last decade. Not Unreal... whoever makes that crappy crappy crappy ass game!

  13. Doom is a little more than graphics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article is right most of the features that made Doom 3 look "unique" will be almost standard by the time it comes out (pixel lighting) , deus ex 2, halo 2 use visual effects that make doom look a bit.. not so impressive anymore.

    However if you had the chance to play and/or see the demos at the quakecon (or the E3 if you were so lucky) I have to tell you this: DOOM 3 still stands from the competition as one of the best Horror games ever seen. The ambience of dread can only be matched by games like "silent hill" and still is not close to the fps experience.

    Doom 3 is not about shooting wave after wave of enemies though, is more like being scared to death of demons that pop out of the dark to (literally) rip your insides out! and no, non believers this is not RE, RE looks like "Mario Sunnyland" compared to this. We are talking demons that each other entrails as you watch, satanic posesions that make peoples eyes explode in their sockets, giant invisible ghosts capable of tearing you limb by limb, guns that leave bullet holes the size of an orange , shotguns that spray walls and ceilings in red with photorealistic quality, we are talking psych trauma material here! if there has ever been truly deserving the AO rating is probably this one. (parents keep you kids as FAR as possible!

    Like in all cases I recommend you wait for the actual game before drawing conclussions imo you wont be dissapointed, you will be scared (and probably regreetful) but you wont be dissapointed.

    btw. You probably didnt knew but doom 3 features an incredible physics engine (which includes fluids for the gruel animations and doors that can be broken by demons among other things), rumor is after seing the half life 2 "demo" the guys at ID went and added more interactions with it so it could be at pair with their competition. Expect doom3 to be amazing in this department (and it already was)

    1. Re:Doom is a little more than graphics... by danila · · Score: 1

      doors that can be broken by demons among other things
      I doubt it. If you refer to the moment in the trailer where two monsters break through the door, then most likely it was yet another scripted scene. Sorry to say it, but you sound like a Doom fanboy and not very objective. I am sure Doom 3 will be a quality game, but I am not sure if it will be able to surpass (or even met) our expectations.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  14. Who cares how long it'll take? by Momomoto · · Score: 4, Funny

    The important part is that it will still be out before Duke Nukem: Forever.

    --
    "Max, come over here. French-Canadian bean soup. I want to pay. Let them leave me alone." - Dutch Schultz
    1. Re:Who cares how long it'll take? by mobby_6kl · · Score: 0

      Just 15 days before. On the other hand they still can change the release date :)

    2. Re:Who cares how long it'll take? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think Duke Nukem:Forever is just a sick joke like the everloading story...

    3. Re:Who cares how long it'll take? by Li0n · · Score: 1

      I bet DN4E will now license the Doom 3 engine and redo everything.

      Nah.. I seriously think they are not working on that anymore. If they are, well... they don't seem to be making any progress...

      --

      ~
      ~
      :wq
  15. Not just a game by malverian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really like to think of most Id games as something that really attracts a large cult following. If you think about nearly every game they have released, you will see that all of them have had very major staying power. People still play Quake3, people still play RTCW.. do you really think this time will be any different?

    Another point I feel is relatively important is that these games are not just games. They are built of beautifully and portably crafted game engines that put a lot of power into the hands of modders and other game developers which license it.

    One reason that I can say I will definitely buy this is that it will run on my system. Unlike some, I don't have that second hard drive with WinXP on it to pop in and use at will to play Deus Ex 2 and whatever other DirectX 9 game hits the market. I'm very intent on supporting people like John Carmack to decide to use published, open standards for their products and for thinking of the small guy (who else releases high quality completely free games like Enemy Territory?)

    --
    You're just mad because the voices in your head talk to me.
    1. Re:Not just a game by AvitarX · · Score: 2, Funny

      Do you realize what completly free means on /.?

      I would definatly call it cost free.
      because there is much more completeness to freedom then cost.

      --
      Wow, sent an e-mail as suggested when clicking on "use classic" banner, and got a fast response that addressed my msg
    2. Re:Not just a game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You hit the nail on the head :)

  16. i'll keep my 486 just in case by understyled · · Score: 0, Redundant

    i find it amazing how all these next gen games are rendering such detailed and complex scenes in realtime nowadays, given that you're running em on an appropriately endowed machine. but quite frankly, after much consideration i think i'm just gonna stick with my dusty 486 which purrs along with ms-dos and a few gems called wolfenstein, day of the tentacle, star control 2, etc etc etc. not to sound like a bitter old man or anything.. just that i seem to prefer the pc games of the late 80s up til about '98 to almost anything new these days..

    "word to your mother" - vanilla ice

    --
    Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    1. Re:i'll keep my 486 just in case by TwistedGreen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I hear you. And there are still plenty of great old games that I still haven't played, but which will run perfectly on a nice 486 or low-end pentium, which you can pretty much find in a dumpster these days. How sad... It goes with my theory that old hardware software never become obsolete, but are merely overlooked for the sake of novelty.

      I'm sure there are still plenty of ideas to be exploited that are implementable on a 486-based system, especially in the adventure game genre. The graphics of that age were a style that, when done well, will never age. Just look at Doom, Lemmings, many of Sierra's adventure games... their graphics were all elegantly crafted to make maximum use of the resources available to them, but still look good, stylistically. It's certainly worth the time to check out these old games.

      Jesus, I'm only 20 and I'm reminiscing about the "days of old." Technology is great. :)

    2. Re:i'll keep my 486 just in case by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  17. Doom 3's graphics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Doom 3's graphics aren't good because they're shiny and pretty, they're good because they make the game immersive as HELL.

  18. hell yeah by gearheadsmp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm still playing Q3A mods like Xtreme Arena with my friends - to show how popular id games still are. Sure, it doesn't have as much eye candy as UT2003, but unlike UT2003 all I have to do to install a Q3A mod in Linux is to just unzip it. Now I'm just waiting for ATI to fix the bug in their 3.2.8 driver that keeps crashing my 9200 in Q3A, UT2003, and NWN. I'm using the DRI r200 driver, and tada! no crashing.

  19. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What are the plans for an OS/2 port? Or OpenVMS? (OpenVMS should be easy; the XdIrect gaming API provides easy access to phonic modulation, which I hear this game uses a lot.)

  20. Great article. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    Cracker: We can start by agreeing that DOOM is the prettiest and most robust engine on the market. We'd be lucky if every game used it.

    Ivan: We can start by agreeing that you are an idiot.

    Cracker: Nice. Perhaps you'd care to elaborate on your jabbing witticism, you ass?


    Oh my god! thats quality journalism for you guys out there.

    Next on slashdot: two guys outside my apt discuss heavily about the GBA vs the PSP and weither they are "faggots" or not! exciting AND educational!

  21. Even been done in Basic... by DruggedBunny · · Score: 3, Informative
    Doom III style normal/bump mapping (simulating thousands of polygons on a low polygon model) has even been done in Basic:

    "Quick doom3 normal mapping demo in Blitz3d"

    ... so the game itself better be good!

    1. Re:Even been done in Basic... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Not really.. blitz basic 3D is a "basic style" script engine sitting on top of an optimized 3d engine (made in delphi or visual c I cant remember) the renderer you mentioned was made as a plugin dll in visual c.

      Your statement would be correct if someone could do this just using visual basic or gwbasic. (which probably wont have the same speed)

  22. It scared the crap out of me too! by antin · · Score: 1

    Seeing my framerate made me realize I was going to have to get a new pc... ;)

    1. Re:It scared the crap out of me too! by aliens · · Score: 1

      I know you're probably joking, but if you're upgrading (since I'm not sure what you have now) at the very least make sure you get a mobo with AGP 8X and a video card that makes use of it.

      I went from an i845D board(AGP 4X) and Radeon 9500Pro to a i865PE (AGP 8X), everything else the same, and I was pleasantly surprised at the difference. Current games 8X vs 4X makes no difference, but it seems the next generation will make use of that bandwidth just fine.

      --
      -- taking over the world, we are.
  23. Don't hold your breath ... by the+real+darkskye · · Score: 1

    Well, holding your breath for that long and the occasionaly visits to unconciousness may pass the time quicker between now and when they are released ;)

    --
    Music is everybody's possession.
    It's only publishers who think that people own it.
    Fuck Beta
    ~John Lenno
  24. Funny all by itself by duggy_92127 · · Score: 1