Slashdot Mirror


Breaking the Gigapixel Barrier

megas writes "Max Lyons has just posted on his site what seems to be the first 1 Gigapixel picture, created from 196 separate photographs taken with a 6 megapixel digital camera, and then stitched together into one seamless composite. According to Max, he has 'been unable to find any record of a higher resolution photographic (i.e. non-scientific) digital image that has been created without resizing a smaller, lower resolution image or using an interpolated image.'"

44 of 538 comments (clear)

  1. My god... by MrEd · · Score: 5, Funny
    Linking a 1 GIGAPIXEL photo to Slashdot? bwwwwwaahahahahahahahahah!


    If I ran his site I'd either trim the star attraction down to a thumbnail-formerly-known-as-gigapixel shot or redirect all Slashdot referrals to goatse...

    --

    Wah!

    1. Re:My god... by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 5, Funny

      Goatse in Gigapixel is something I really don't want to see. Normal Goatse is bad enough.

    2. Re:My god... by interiot · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd be able to see enough detail to give him a colonoscopy just from the image.

  2. Wow! by krbvroc1 · · Score: 5, Funny

    That picture is amazing. I asked the photographer to email me a copy of the original but I haven't been able to access my mail server for hours. ;)

  3. Hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Max Lyons

    Did this guy switch over to his porn name or what?

    And speaking of porn, how 'bout that gigapixel picture, eh? ;)

    1. Re:Hmm by dputzter82 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That would just plain suck. Part of what makes porn great is that it usually comes in low quality format and your mind can sorta fill in the fuzzy gaps. With that kind of resolution, the models would go from amazing sex machines to some crazy, jaw clinching people whome you could count moles and hair stubble under the armpits on.

      Really, the biggest benifit of working is IT is access to all the free software *cough*

    2. Re:Hmm by emilng · · Score: 2, Funny

      "your mind can sorta fill in the fuzzy gaps"

      LOL. This is all the comment it needs.

  4. new low by 3ryon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Max Lyons has just posted on his site what it seems to be the first 1 Gigapixel picture, created from 196 separate photographs taken with a 6 megapixel digital camera, and then stitched together into one seamless composite.

    And thus became the first person to ever be slashdotted by only one visitor.

  5. Next stage ... by jonbryce · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is to print each one of them on a separate sheet of paper, and tape them together?

    1. Re:Next stage ... by retinaburn · · Score: 5, Funny
      I am printing it out on my dot-matrix printer.

      somewhere the photographer screams in pain

    2. Re:Next stage ... by addaon · · Score: 5, Funny

      somewhere the pointillists giggle to themselves.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    3. Re:Next stage ... by cryptor3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Then after that, we need to convert it to ASCII art. That'll be a doozy.

    4. Re:Next stage ... by swb · · Score: 4, Funny

      nmap for open LPR ports. I'm sure there are some out there.

    5. Re:Next stage ... by zyridium · · Score: 2, Funny

      The key here is to work out what ASCII resolution we need to make a perfect image, bugger the pixels :)

  6. Finally, the long, sad wait is over: by burgburgburg · · Score: 5, Funny

    The nation can rest, confident that we were the first to break the dreaded Gigapixel barrier. God speed, Max Lyon.

  7. Why by ad0gg · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why couldn't have been porn?!?!?!

    sigh

    --

    Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    1. Re:Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I guess you have slept with my wife yet

    2. Re:Why by IvyMike · · Score: 5, Funny

      Because at that resolution, you would see her mitochondria.

    3. Re:Why by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      What, and you think mitochondria ain't sexy?

      You haven't seen the mitochondria I have. Woo Woo!

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Why by MR.Gates · · Score: 5, Funny

      Mayby not, but the rest of the neighborhood has. ;-P

      --

      A few hours grace before the madness begins again.
    5. Re:Why by philci52 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or her crabs!

      Sorry, couldn't resist.

  8. Dots by fiber0pti · · Score: 0, Funny

    Connect the dots - lalala

  9. ouch.. by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    A gigapixel "Where's Waldo" would drive thousands insane.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  10. Pff easy by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Funny

    I use a billion monkeys, each looking at one particular bit of a scenery, then I tell them to line up and take turn at the keyboard, to type what they saw in emacs (the favorite monkey editor, it requires a lot of dexterity), and compile a very large XPM file.

    So what? this guy just figured out a way not to deal with a billion bananas and hundreds of tons of chimp shit. Big deal ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  11. Now.. by hatefulmofo · · Score: 2, Funny

    To make a monitor large enough to use that picture as it's background.

  12. A New Record! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I'll have the 1.000000001 Gigapixel picture ready later today.

  13. 8x10 Gigapixel Digital View Camera? by mikeophile · · Score: 4, Funny
    The 196 frames in that composite are pretty close to the the actual size of the CMOS sensor in the "35mm" digital cameras. If you had a big wad of cash burning a hole in your tailored pants, you could mount those sensors onto the backplane of an 8x10 view camera.

    I don't think even a Carl Zeiss lens can actually resolve a billion pixels, but it's worth a shot. Isn't it?

  14. This would be the new camera standard by nizo · · Score: 4, Funny

    At least it would, if Seagate/Maxtor/WD/Samsung could get their way.

  15. Re:First or first amature image? by letxa2000 · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have a map of the world that's actual size. In the corner it says "1 mile = 1 mile." Last summer I folded it.

  16. Wouldn't it have been a bummer if by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 3, Funny

    after all that patient work, stitching and blending and doing everything manually for days, he realized he had left the lens cap on ?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  17. I have a dialup line ... by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ... and can't download such a huge picture. Could someone condense it down a bit and send me a copy?

  18. Re:Relatively static? by Dutchmaan · · Score: 2, Funny

    The guy said he needed a subject that was relatively static. But shadows on a canyon wall are not static. He says it took him 13 minutes. I wonder if there was any noticeable movement in the shadows in that time?

    I wonder if thats where the term relatively comes in?

  19. That seems like an awful lot of work.... by raehl · · Score: 4, Funny

    Stitching all of those pictures together.

    The submitter obviously doesn't work at a University, where they'd drastically simplify the process. Instead of just using one camera to construct the image, they'd buy 196 digital cameras, make a cluster out of them, maintain a staff of undergraduate students to keep the cluster working, and then complain about their picture-scheduling software losing shots. But once they got the cluster in the right location to take the picture, it would only take them a few minutes to take and process the picture, a huge performance increase over the days required using one camera.

  20. but we cannot rest! by cheezus · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Commies are pumping billions into Terrapixel research. There can not be a terrapixel gap!

    --
    /bin/fortune | slashdotsig.sh
    1. Re:but we cannot rest! by BhAaD · · Score: 3, Funny

      He should take a 1000 of those Gegapixel pictures and make a Terapixel picture. Now there's something amazing!

  21. IT'S A TRAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Do not open this with MSPaint. Your PC will lock up for 3 days, then popup message will say "Install Linux to view image." You will know fear. You will know pain. And then you will crash. (mangled B5/JMS quote)

  22. Hehe by planetoid · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ansel Adams just got friggin' OWNED!

    --
    Slashdot requires you to wait longer between hitting 'reply' and submitting a comment.
    1. Re:Hehe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      This is Slashdot, not CounterStrike.

  23. Re:How do you print it? by JSmooth · · Score: 4, Funny

    These guyscan help ya:

    They got a 10' foot thermal for only $275,000. I'd snap it up.

  24. I Dunno, people by fsbilly · · Score: 2, Funny

    Call me crazy, but it looks like 72dpi to me.

  25. Re:Huge bandwidth bills aren't funny... by BdosError · · Score: 4, Funny
    Who are grading these things?

    My guess would be The Public(tm).

    I know what Americans out there are thinking: democracy is scary. Well don't worry, it is at first, but you'll get used to it with practice.

    Now, if only I could auto-mod myself as Flamebait.

    --
    Complexity is Easy. Simplicity is Hard.
  26. Re:How many pixels are enough? by michaeltoe · · Score: 2, Funny

    depends on the relative scale. Sooner or later photons would become larger than the individual receptor... but that's why they invented electron microscopes.

  27. You forgot... by Charcharodon · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...Kingston, Crucial, Lexar, Sandisk...

    "Wow look at my brand new gigapixel camera!"

    "How many picture can you get on your $600 4gb compact flash card?"

    "Hmmm on the lowest setting?"

    "Yeah"

    "Two"

  28. Re:How many pixels are enough? by Quixadhal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, many years of it should compress nicely:

    Day 7781, 8am:
    Sitting at desk, white cubical walls surround three sides, monitor in front with 1024x768 changing pixels. Fingers on keyboard move. Mouse moves every so often. Coffee level drops.

    Day 7781, 1pm:
    Sitting at desk, white cubical walls surround three sides, monitor in front with 1024x768 changing pixels. Fingers on keyboard move. Mouse moves every so often. Water level drops.

    Oh yeah, if you want to add sound recording:

    "God damn windows!"
    "Bite me Bill Gates!"
    "You want me to code WHAT?"
    "Grrrr, why isn't cut-and-paste consistant in X?"
    "*mumble* site must be slashdotted again"