Slashdot Mirror


SETI Project Scientist Discusses Prospects

An anonymous reader writes "Today Astrobiology Magazine interviewed SETI@home Project Scientist, Dan Wertheimer, about subjects including the first detailed 'best of SETI' candidate reobservations for repeating telescope acquisition on the most promising 166 star candidates. Their policy is not to release precise sky coordinates on the best ones yet (so far a signal called SHGb11+15a), with this type of Gaussian signal shape. The candidates number some 400 million Gaussians and 5.7 billion spikes."

42 of 384 comments (clear)

  1. I don't know about you all, by Wigfield · · Score: 2, Funny

    but I, for one, welcome our new radio communicating alien overlords.

    1. Re:I don't know about you all, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Well, in Soviet Russia the Aliens scan you!

  2. I wish they would release the data by Space+cowboy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'd love to give it a go with my very own personal radio telescope (dish.jpg). Sure it'd be hard to point, and maybe not possible to receive anything at all, but I'd like to try :-)

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  3. Have we picked up any good alien sitcoms yet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Because the networks haven't been putting out anything but complete and utter crap. Maybe some alien crap will be better.

    1. Re:Have we picked up any good alien sitcoms yet... by silverhalide · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why does not Ross, the largest of the "Friends" simply devour the others?!

    2. Re:Have we picked up any good alien sitcoms yet... by Rocky · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah. It pisses me off that I won't get to see the season finale of "Single Female Lawyer"...

      --
      "I'm an old-fashioned type of guy. I worship the Sun and Moon as gods. And fear them."
    3. Re:Have we picked up any good alien sitcoms yet... by heneon · · Score: 2, Funny

      Aw, I dunno. That's a chick show. I prefer programs of the genre "world's blankiest blank."

  4. Wanna bet... by r_j_prahad · · Score: 4, Funny

    It'll probably turn out to be an alien goatse when they finally get it decoded.

    1. Re:Wanna bet... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 5, Funny

      It'll probably turn out to be an alien goatse when they finally get it decoded.

      <Marvin the Martian>
      Where was the blood-curdling scream? There was supposed to be an "Ahhh! My Eyes!!!" scream!
      </Marvin the Martian>

      --

    2. Re:Wanna bet... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Funny

      It'll probably turn out to be an alien goatse when they finally get it decoded.

      SETI Scientist: Professor, we've decoded the image!

      Prof: Let's see... oh, my stars! Is there a xenoproctologist in the house?!

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    3. Re:Wanna bet... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      It's only fair... Earth is sending goatse signals out after all. We're hoping it will curb down the probings.

    4. Re:Wanna bet... by Maax · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Oh my god, it's full of .... EEEUUUUWWWWWWW!!!"

  5. intelligent beings from other galaxies using radio by Savatte · · Score: 5, Funny

    damn, i didn't think clearchannel had THAT much influence

  6. This is like monkeys trying to figure out books. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Forget it. They're laughing at us. We're trying to find transmissions based on how we'd transmit data now. We're looking for smoke signals from civilizations that use Wavelet enncoded HDTV. We're trying to find cizilizations similar to our own; intellegent species have probably advanced way beyond some local interplanetary WIFI model. They're probably chuckling at our feeble attempts right now. Chuckling in their own vieny large headed kind of way. Puny humans.

  7. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by michrech · · Score: 5, Funny

    Why, of course we'll decode it. Then, we'll find the instructions to build a capsule of some sort. Well, of course all the governments will go bankrupt (or very close) building it for it to get sabotaged by some idiot. Then, an odd and insanely rich person will decide to build one in secret so that they can carry out the test... wait.. I think I've seen this all somewhere before...

    --
    bork bork bork!
  8. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    After we get signal, you ask?

    Main screen turn on, of course.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  9. Re:Let's say we find their website by doorbot.com · · Score: 5, Funny

    What will be the next step after we detect a signal?

    Clearly, we will /. them into oblivion!

  10. Audible spectrum by nacturation · · Score: 5, Funny

    The study also mentioned that they processed the radiotelescope signal to extract the audio component. Listen to SHGb11+15a.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  11. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by Chanc_Gorkon · · Score: 2, Funny

    First rule in government spending: why build one when you can have two at twice the price? That's what I would say! :)

    --

    Gorkman

  12. big number by tjw · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:
    The number of stars in the visible universe, for instance, is estimated to be 70 sextillion, or 70,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 [seven followed by twenty-two zeros].
    • one hundred billion times the number of letters in the 14 million books in the Library of Congress
    Whew, I'm glad that got quantified in standard LoC units.
    --

    XJS*C4JDBQADN1.NSBN3*2IDNEN*GTUBE-STANDARD-ANTI-UB E-TEST-EMAIL*C.34X
  13. Re:Alien Technology and Communication by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    > If Aliens were trying to communicate with use why wouldn't they use radio/tv signals that would get out attention.

    Well, that would explain Ally McBeal.

  14. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by shrubya · · Score: 2, Funny
    What will be the next step after we detect a signal?

    Kent: "So, professor, would you say it's time for everyone to panic?"
    Prof: "Yes, I would, Kent."

  15. Why they don't release the co-ordinates by wackybrit · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nothing in these stories specify why they're not releasing the co-ordinates yet, and I thought Slashdot readers might be particularly interested in this.

    I work at a computer lab which is used by a branch of a certain space agency (not NASA, but they have similar policies) and we process a lot of data for these folks (It's a bit like SETI@Home, but we get what are called the 'higher level' packets, given only to accredited packets of ramen.)

    When you're dealing with signals from large distances (over a few thousand miles) you need a lot of gain on your aerial to get a strong signal. This is why they use giant dishes at places like Aribico, because the largeness of dish allows the signal to be taken and magnified when it gets here, so you get a clearer signal from a noisy signal (for the non scientific people here.. it's like how in CSI they can zoom in a noisy picture and 'clean it up' or look round corners and stuff).

    Well, this high gain aerial 'sucks up' (again, non science speak) a lot of the signal. This means if they gave out the co-ordinates everyone would try to listen in to the stuff coming from that area, and diminish all of the signal so that SETI couldn't pick up anything even on their big aerials. It's kinda like how if a radio station has more listeners, they have to turn the signal up.. but we can't tell the aliens to do that!

    The same thing happens with light, but to a lesser extent. Theoretically if you had a million people looking at a single LED, the light would be so spread out that it would appear to go off. This is why, as children, we're told not to look at the sun, because if we all did that, we would be plunged into darkness.

    Anyway, I hope that cleared it all up.

  16. Whoa... by skebe · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Their policy is not to release precise sky coordinates on the best ones yet (so far a signal called SHGb11+15a), with this type of Gaussian signal shape." Guess they're afriad of someone /.'ing the coorodinates?

    1. Re:Whoa... by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 2, Funny
      Guess they're afriad of someone /.'ing the coorodinates?
      Nah, probably the same reason you wouldn't want to see your own email-adress on a website. Those E.T.s don't want to receive spam.
  17. Re:This is like monkeys trying to figure out books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, we are laughing...

  18. Re:Copyright on the Data by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean, it's like asking if Jesus comes back will he prefer Linux or BSD. The significance of the event so far outweighs the debate that the debate is rendered meaningless.

    Well, as long as he does not prefer Windows - I tend to agree. ;)

  19. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by An.+(Coward) · · Score: 2, Funny

    What will be the next step after we detect a signal?

    Well duh, blow it up of course.

  20. Re:Copyright on the Data by liquidsin · · Score: 5, Funny

    And if he does we can always just have him nailed to a cross or something...

    I'm just kidding! We're talking about Linux users here, not a bunch of zealo...oh, wait...

    --
    do not read this line twice.
  21. Re:Copyright on the Data by DirtyJ · · Score: 4, Funny

    You say that now, but wait until SCO claims prior art on anal probing.

  22. Re:An excellent point from Ray Kurweil by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    I got a question for you.. nothing that disses your faith, just something i wanted to know.

    why (do you think) god is so active in the bible but he hasn't done anything in the past mmmmmmm 1000+ years? i'm talking big events. like the 40 year flood, the destruction of 2 cities, the 7 plauges, the whole jesus thing.. is seems (to me) like we're either doing something right and he is leaving us alone because of it or he stoped caring..

  23. Re:SETI will never find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yeah, I want my computer analyzing proteins, which will then be used by large drug companies to make expensive drugs that I will end up paying huge amounts of money for when I need them in my dotage, with the only known side effects being impontency and the random growth of extra limbs.

    Great.

  24. Re:Reverse Radio telescope? by the_bard17 · · Score: 3, Funny

    We already know that what the mainstream music industry (at least, here in the US) is putting is crap.

    Do we really need to launch a satellite to figure that out?

  25. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Funny
    People of Earth... send more records...

    Message repeats.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  26. Re:Let's say we find somebody out there. by nettdata · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll get a "cease and desist" letter from some inter-gallactic lawyer citing the DMCA.

    --



    $0.02 (CDN)
  27. We are making noise... by zeux · · Score: 2, Funny

    I still strongly think that we should maybe just 'shut up' instead of sending signals all over the place and trying to contact another planet.

    One of these days a civilization will catch one, spot us and they will destroy us just because we could later hurt them if we continue to develop and spread.

    Damn we are sending signals since the 30s and even if they are weak, they must be quite far now.

    I'm fine with listening but I wouldn't send high power messages like we are doing.

    Remember about that guy that used to send his spam in deep space ? It was covered by /.. The aliens will be pissed off if they get a couple million 'grow your penis' messages.

  28. Re:An excellent point from Ray Kurweil by banzai75 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That is about the same energy as exploding 175 tons of TNT per pea.

    Hmmm, reminds me of the morning after a night out on the town.

  29. You people can't be serious! by commodoresloat · · Score: 4, Funny

    I mean come on, folks. Jesus uses a Mac. It's obvious. And any other view is heresy. Can I get an Amen?

    1. Re:You people can't be serious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Not a chance. Macs are products of evil.

      That's why the serpent in Eden was tempting Eve with an Apple.

    2. Re:You people can't be serious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      No, Jesus WAS Amiga - 2nd Coming and all that, he chose the most advanced form available at the time. And you killed him, again, you bastards!

  30. Hmmm ... by pherris · · Score: 3, Funny
    Long hair, sandles, old clothes and all knowing? Could be Mac but more likely a BSD guy. Depends, does he have an iPod on him? It's a hard one to nail down.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  31. Re:An excellent point from Ray Kurweil by Minna+Kirai · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or it could be that there are no aliens in the universe because God didn't create them. In fact, if He had created them, it would have said so in the Bible.

    There are no penguins, because God didn't create them. If He had, it would have said so in the Bible.

    Therefore Linux is a tool of the Devil!