Slashdot Mirror
MandrakeSoft Improves Financial Health
joestar writes "MandrakeSoft's latest financial results have been posted to their website. Despite a slight decrease in revenues - mostly due to the dollar/euro rate and negative effects of the Chapter 11-like protection - first results seem impressive: "the company reduced operational expenses by a factor of 5, increased gross margins by a factor of 5 and reduced its losses by a factor of 7". As a result, MandrakeSoft has been cash-flow positive since January 2003, and expects its first positive result for the current quarter! Along with latest Mandrake Linux cool products, these are excellent news in my opinion because it shows that an appropriate business model can help Linux companies greatly."
It's good to see a company that makes a fine product doing well. See, Darl? Money CAN be made from selling software.
"...if you don't like your job, you don't strike. You just go in every day and do it really half-assed..." -Homer
Now mandrake move looks a cool idea in storing all the files on the move however what would be even better is a system which boots from a USB device. Now that would be cool
Rus
Cheap UK and US VPS
I'm glad that mandrake is able to make a bit of a profit while still providing a free download edition; without going the redhat way of dropping the home user line entirely. Hopefully other linux companies will see that the Redhat way is not the only way to profitability.
slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
...Slashdot found out and saturated their web site with so many hits that they'll spend the next three years paying for the bandwidth...
Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
I for one am a big fan of mandrake and I'll probably subscribe to the MandrakeClub support once my 9.2 discs arrive. I can't wait!
it shows that an appropriate business model can help Linux companies greatly
I don't think that MandrakeSoft's business model really scales very well.
1. Tell everyone that you're about to go out of business.
2. Ask for donations.
3. PROFIT!
may have worked so far, but it's self-limiting -- as soon as you start to PROFIT!, it becomes hard to claim that you're about to go out of business.
Tarsnap: Online backups for the truly paranoid
Since when is "Chapter 11-like protection" a good business model??
I pretty much only use Debian for linux, but Mandrake is pretty cool. Mainly for how simple it is. It's a distro that I know I could give to most people (largely computer inexperienced) I know if they wanted to play with Linux. The simple installer is as easy as installing a *nix distro gets. Period. It is, in fact, easier than the Windows installer is.
i never knew chmod 755 could do THAT for a company!
If you don't know what AltaVista is (was), get off my lawn.
Mandrake is a good distro for new users. It is cake to partition, install and use. You don't have to know any command line applications to configure your system. While this may be true for other distros as well, Mandrake does this very well.
Alot of people, including myself, think that mandrake is the closest thing to a desktop linux for the masses currently available.
Not everything is analogous to cars. Car analogies rarely work.
http://www.mandrakesoft.com/products/mandrakemove
But doesn't Knoppix already do this?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
It's part of the business model. It's just one you don't like, and that's no reason to drag it down.
Or would you rather them go out of business and have one of the most user friendly distros gone so we're one step closer to having only uber geeks using Linux? Oh -- and if they go under, we'd lose the brand I see the most of on the shelves at Best Buy and other stores.
Advertising is a legitimate business model-- it's an annoying one, but nobody can question their right to do so if they choose. As for going under, it doesn't look like they are NOW.
The CD-ROMs thing.. well, blame LG for producing a drive that CLEARLY violates the specifications and reuses a nondestructive command for a destructive firmware command.
You can point to the earlier stuff all you like-- perhaps only the ONE is still valid though-- but the CD-ROM thing you can't point to Mandrake on.
I think begging for money to avoid going under is not a business model. But that's just me.
Advertising is a legitimate business model-- it's an annoying one, but nobody can question their right to do so if they choose(..)
I certainly don't mind their ads during install. First of all, they let me download the iso for free, second, you can just do something else while the installer runs, it's not like you have to watch.
Because they just follow the standard path of any software/web business:
B2C -> B2B -> B2Chapter11
You might as well go back to the tried and true
- Sell free software
- ???
- Profit!!1!
That's about a valid "business model" as any.I don't want to see them go out of business - that's no skin off my ass, really. But to wax poetic about how "this proves that Linux companies can make money" is stupid. RedHat - now there's a business model.
True, Mandrake is easy to install. But I think in the last year/year and a half, the desktop playing field is more level than it's ever been. Take a look at Mandrake, RedHat/Fedora and SuSE - they ALL have easy and attractive install/configure programs now.
The only reason Mandrake was "begging" was due to errors made by the FORMER bosses making massive screwups like trying to push Mandrake into "E-Learning". It has NOTHING to do with a flaw in their business model.
Does it really matter so much if it's easy to install? I have my computer illiterate family running Slackware full-time, and they're not having any problems... because I set it up. Most of the time, people get geeks to install Windows for them as well. I think the install matters less and less, and ease of use once it's actually installed is what matters... and in that department, pretty much every distro is the same, as long as they don't bloat it up with 50 icons on the desktop ala Mandrake.
Happy New Year, it's 1984!
Since when is "Chapter 11-like protection" a good business model??
Since staying in business is better than going out of business, quite a while.
In the early 90s, I worked for a company that filed for Chapter 11 protection while I was on vacation.
"D'ah!" thought I.
Not a terrible thing, really. Debt got restructured (read: our creditors took it in the a**), we got rid of a whole lot of things we didn't really need (read: way too much floorspace (including a no-longer-used manufacturing area)), and got out of a lease on said space, moving to a more appropriate-sized office at a much lower per-foot cost. Then came a couple of years of consecutive positive cash-flow, and *poof* we were out of Chapter 11. Never missed a paycheck, got raises during that time, etc.
No big deal from where I stand.
Would it have been better to have had a better handle on what was going on before it got to the point where Chapter 11 protection was necessary?
You bet.
Was it a handy way of saving the company?
Damn skippy.
In walking, just walk. In sitting, just sit. Above all, don't wobble.
-- Yun-Men
The last Mandrake release had a bunch of bugfix updates right after the ISOs went golden requiring the users to download many megabytes of updates. Could this be a result of firing developers? Has anyone seen the lay-offs impacting quality?
I'm quite curious since I use Mdk myself.
Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
I think that I moved to Mandrake at release 7.2 - RedHat was starting to look too much proprietary to me, something that recent news have confirmed.
Mandrake does include bleeding edge software, but normally it's mostly optional - you can run a real stable server system if you want to with it. I have used Mandrake as both my standard desktop (both in my computer and my wife's notebook). never got any HW detection problems. Recently I bought an USB Ethernet adapter. Just plugged it into wife's notebook USB port, it started to work. No hassles at all. Period.
Also, Mandrake is my Firewall Solution for years now, as Mandrake was the only distribution that allowed me to use my old Performa 6360 as a firewall.
If this is not important to you, or if you suggest me to use NetBSD for PPC instead, forget it. The 6360 has no video/kdb console accessible and so I had to use the serial console directly - which had instability problems and became completed frozen up from hour to hour.
"But you can connect from the network!"
Nope. The network driver couldn't contact my little ethernet network, and locked up the entire machine. And I don't use RealCrap cards in this server, but an ANA-6922TX card.
So, I,ve tried Mandrake as Yellow Dog didn't install; LinuxPPC was fine but had a pretty outdated selection of packages. I'm glad I've done this.
Now, if I just could find one or two 32 MB memory DIMMs for the Performa to replace my two 16 MB DIMMs...
--------
Fighting the herd since 1985.
I downloaded mandrake, and use it on my desktop and laptop, but I have never paied a dime to any linux or open source project. I'm just a student I can't afford to pay. I am wondering if I am helping or hurting by just grabbing my ISOs and running? It allows the to become noticed by providing free software, but look at music downloads, would you download a song and then go pay for the album just to support the artist?
404
If you find yourself looking for Mandrake rpm's all the time, searching forums with the keyword Mandrake often enough, or want to join a productive and growing community, consider joining MandrakeClub.
You are supporting Mandrake (the developers, company, and distribution) through MandrakeClub. There are several benefits that are nice to have (select mirrors, a huge archive of Mandrake rpms, and bittorrents for ISO's) not to mention the fact that you are supporting an operating systems designed with you in mind. There are even forums for different languages. This is a volunteer community by-and-large. No one was forced to come because they found Mandrake preloaded on their computer.
You pay for one year, with 4 levels of subscription. A silver subscription gets you most everything you want for $120/year. Remember, you are not just supporting a corporation. You are supporting a free product (development, patching, documentation, and web hosting) which brings free software that much closer to everyone (including you).
I do not work for Mandrake. Look at the options yourself. And remember Linux and Mandrake are not free because they don't cost anything - they are free because they are supported by people who believe they should be free.
Even better, check out Texstar's work which pre-dates MM;
Enron and Worldcom appeared to be doing okay too, and many other tech companies have been known to use "creative accounting practices" to skew their quarterly and yearly figures to impress potential investors.
Am I the only skeptic of such a sudden turnaround? Someone ought to be looking into their capital expeditures to see if they've been writing off some big spending...
RPM hell? When was the last time you used mandrake? You do know that you have to configure urpmi so that it can download latest software from mirrors, which by the way can easily be found on this site:
Easy Urpmi
Subscription service is a value added service for club members. There you can get the latest test software and then club members test them before they are released to rest of the public. So get a clue before starting to flame.
What's under yellowstone?
Comment removed based on user account deletion
I said it before, and I say it again:
They might see more subscriptions if they would consider a name change or at least give an alternative, more business-like name to their products.
I, for one, do not like to have an entry for 'Mandrake Club Services', paid to a French company, in my books.
Imagine the astonishment of the taxman when I try to deduct this as a professional expense.
It is MUCH easier than that. _Every_ Mandrake program has an autoupdate, through mandrakeupdate.
If you use 3rd party programs, well - it is your problem.
A distribution should take care of _every_ program installed, any other way and it will be hard to maintain consistency.
I took my first serious foray into Linux about a year age with MDK9.0 on it's reputation as a 'newbie' distro. It has a LARGE and friendly user base and that (IMHO) must be taken into consideration when you are getting into Linux
Let's face it. People who are trying to learn Linux are going to run into difficulty at some point, period. Sometimes people need to ask simple questions that would get scornful "RTFM n00b!" replies on any other group, but someone in an MDK forum will at least point you in the right direction without ripping your head off.
Linux requires you to know stuff about your OS, and part of the learning curve is learning *how* to help yourself. Snooty attitudes from ubergurus are about as counterproductive as can be.
alt.os.linux.mandrake is an AMAZING resource. Some issues are distro specific and because the MDK user base is so large, chances are someone else had already had that problem and someone else has offered a solution. As a resource for troubleshooting, having access to a large friendly newsgroup (which is fully archived by groups.google.com to boot) that uses your specific distro cannot be understimated.
Now that MDK is the only commercial distro that 1) targets ease of use for the consumer desktop 2) has a significant sized friendly community and 3) allows full ISO downloads for free*, it's a no brainer for anyone wanting to get into linux
*it obviously costs them money to develop or distribute it. Feel free to download the ISOs to try it out, but consider supporting them by buying a retail pack or syearly subscription if you continue to use it.
Bankruptcy is not a bad thing, particulary Chapter 11. Chapter 11 provides an opportunity to stop, catch your breath, and reassess things. From the instant (down to the very second) that a petition is filed, all debt collection activities must stop. (called the "automatic stay") Then the Debtor In Posession (what they call it when the person who declared bankruptcy is left in charge of it) lists all their debts and liabilities, all their assets, and makes up a plan to repay the debt. If a certain percentage of the creditors (the people who are owed the money) agree to the plan, it gets implemented. There may be incentives to meeting certain goals in the plan. For example if the debtor makes all of his planned payments in the first two years, and gets 85 to 90% of their debt paid down, they may get the rest forgiven. It all depends on what the Debtor and Creditors (represented by the Creditor's Committee) agree to. Debtors rarely stay in Chapter 11 for more then three years; at which time they either emerge from bankruptcy, or convert to a Chapter 7 liquidation. The whole thing operates with little intervention by the courts. (that's why being a bankruptcy judge is a sweet job. All the perks of a full "Article III" Judge, but no lifetime tenure.) Just for reference:
Chapter 7, liquidation. Corporations and individuals. They take all your non-exempt stuff and sell it to pay off what they can. After that, most all of the remaining debts are wiped clean. Contrary to popular belief, your student loans are NOT dischargeable in bankruptcy.
Chapter 9, Municipalities and gov't entities. Not really used anymore, except for Orange County CA in the early 90's.
Chapter 11, Reorganization. For all corporations and some individuals with complex finances.
Chapter 12, Farmers.
Chapter 13 It's basically simplified Chapter 11 for individual persons (not corps) with simple finances. Meant to streamline the process.
Lagniappe Fun Fact: Chapter 12 is the only even numbered chapter in the entire bankruptcy code. No on has any idea why this is.
Red Hat have handed Mandrake the desktop baton. The failure of US Justice department to get anywhere near solving the antitrust issues with current desktops pretty well spoiled the opportunity for Linux desktops in the US. Maybe Lindows will fight the defence on behalf of the US consumer.
Mandrake is delivering on the financials. Now lets see what the EU Commission on competition does on helping to create a level playing field. Will the rights of consumers prevail ? Munich is an important proving ground but expect some serious payola to flow to stop other cities. Whats 40 Billion USD work out to be in Euros now ?.
At CompUSA, I haven't seen Mandrake since the 8.X days. After they sell their obsolete RH9 boxen, it will be a SuSe shop.
Slow down, cowboy! It has been 4 hours since you last posted. You must wait another few hours.
Comment removed based on user account deletion
> See, Darl? Money CAN be made from selling software.
Don't you mean begging people for donations to help pull you out of debt? Either way, I suppose it's better than the litigious route.
I hope this will improve quality of their releases. Quality was the reason why we switched to Mandrake four years ago.
Not to rain on the parade but please notice that this is a Mandrake company web page with some pretty graphs and just a handfull of numbers. Dunno about you, but I prefer to see official financial filings with an auditor's stamp of approval. Even just a regular cash flow statement and a balance sheet would be nice.
I've been using MDK for almost 2 years now and think that it is a great distro with the exception of its updating mechanism. Generally, I haven't had very much luck with its update (either requiring a fresh install or the update breaks things that worked before)
/, /usr, and /home partitions though make this at least somewhat workable. And at least the install is pretty easy (and does a nice job with autodetecting most things so I don't have to do things like set my monitor scane rates manually)
Separate
Overall all, though I've been pretty impressed with each release of MDK.
-- The Genesis project? What's that?
I used to work for a small online retailer. We lost enough money from overseas ripoffs, challenged credit card charges and destructive idiots (ex. spilling coke on a sensitive eletronic component and then sending it back with a threat to sue us for selling "crap") that enough companies giving it too us in the a** via bankruptcy would have been too much. Come on!
No - revenue is is Euros. And it's down. And revenue can't just be down because of the exchange rate, unless you only count revenue in dollars ... but why would you want to do that?
No everyone can update through MandrakeUpdate.
Based upon the discussions in this thread, I went to the website. And saw that the "Powerpack Edition" has the following:
1) VmWare (workstation edition)
2) VariCAD
3) Win4Lin
The whole thing is $69 USD, seems like a helluva deal.
.
Am I missing something? Are these just "evaluation version"?
A goal is a dream with a deadline
At some point hand configuring everything gets pretty old. Mostly I like to just use my computer and Mandrake has the simple usability so many other good systems lack (Debian/Gentoo/Etc). Not to knock them, but even smart people get lazy and it always kind of made me laugh that that a usable systems is sort of looked down on, like there's some reason in 2003 we should still be doing everything by hand. To me high-tech should be transparent and usable.
Quack, quack.
I'm very hopeful that Mandrake will survive. In addition to being a really nice distro for many years, we need diversity, so I want SuSE (Novell), RH, Mandrake, Debian, the *BSD's, Apple and many more to thrive. At the risk of being modded (is that a word?) to hell, I even want MS to survive long term, since MS's misbehaviours are a big driver for the tons of good work being done in the open source and free software arena, as well as some of the better attitudes in traditional companies like IBM, Sun and Apple.
Only a wide open and long term competition of approaches, value systems and individual people ensures positive progress and yes: freedom!
Here's the link.
Mandrake started their "Mandrake Club" in late 2001. You can read the press release here (December 10th 2001) and a related Slashdot story here. As you know, of course from reading, Mandrake filed for protection at the end of January 2003.
Your just another troll, not even good enough to do a quick search. I applaud Mandrake and their attempt to build a successful and progressive business model. I'm a member since 2001.
Quack, quack.
Ironically, this news makes me feel more like paying up for Mandrake Club membership - at the point when they needed it most, it seemed least worthwhile since who knew when they might be going out of business? God, what a shitty way to think. I'm glad they've managed to pull through in spite of people like me.
Experience is a hard school, but fools will learn no other.
Chooks-sama,
/mandrake/9.2/
urpmi is your mdk friend.
Your very best mdk friend.
Spend an hour with this, and if you have the hard-drive to do so, create a folder in rootspace, say
blow all the RPMS from the disks into it
Then
urpmi.addmedia -f mrpms file://mandrake/9.2
Then you can use the GUI to look through your media sources, and all the installs can come from that media source.
Be sure to add an "update source" using the GUI interface because that's not very friendly yet, but after that a quick trip to
man urpmi
will always steer you in the right direction.
There's other tools similar to this which stomp on "anti-RPM" sentiments like a grape. I once hated RPM distros but Mandrake has done an incredible job.
Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
Debian is Slow, Worse, Expensive
/lib/modules, as you are going to need it.
Open source may be good, but there is one example that sticks out like a sore thumb as a problem with open source. Debian gnu/Linux. It is offically the Worst Linux Distribution ever made.
First of all, Debian has the most out of date software packages of any major mainstream distros. Even in the unstable version, is KDE 2.2 and Gnome 2.0, with Xfree86 4.1 (A version that really sucks). There are literally years that pass between each update of Debian.
Secondly, its a pain in the goatse to set up, first of all, you are forced to use Kernel 2.2, which is horribly hacked with "backports" to get any use on any modern machine (Read, made after 1999). Good luck memorizing all the *.ko files in
Configuring XFree86 is hell! If you don't have a Thick X11 orilley book, and a list of your horizontal sync values from your monitor's intruction manual (if you even have one), BOOM! There goes your monitor.
Even then, good luck getting anything over 640x480@16 colours.
The most common response to help questions on the Debian mailing list is "n00b, READ THE FUCKING MANUAL, you idiot, go back to WINDOWS XP if you can't learn to use dselect", true too, search the archives if you think I'm lying. Other distros give you comprehensive PRINTED MANUALS, PHONE SUPPPORT and/or freindly forums where repling RTFM gets you banned!
Debians support for any decent hardware, including USB mice, scanners, Sound cards, heck even Serial devices struggle. If you can even get 80x25 text mode with PS/2 input devices you are really lucky.
Apt-get has many flaws. First of all it uses a non standard package format (the rest of the world uses RPM, deprecate the DEB format!), has broken respetories, and out of date software to install. All this combined with the kludgey dselect user interface make package management a nightmare.
And if you think I'm joking about this, find out why THOUSANDS of Debian users are switching to REAL distributions Debian is falling to pieces, if it is to survive any market share it will be through its superior forks (Xandros, Lindows, K/G-noppix) and unoffical package respetories.
Of course, while all this is going on, the only thing the Debian maintainers do is argue about politics on the mailing lists. The distribution decays while its creators argue over inane details like software licensing and the virtues of Marxism. Please! Spare me the political rhetoric and just give me a working distro!
Don't get me wrong, I love Linux, and I'm happily using distros such as Mandrake, SuSE, Gentoo and Fedora. But I'm sick to death of zealots that push obsolete Distros on me EVERY FREAKING TIME linux is mentioned. I'm speaking from real world experiance here.
No, Mandrake is a poor distro for new users. Its lack of QA, huge number of bugs (see the errata and updates list) and general disinterest in stability has put many newcomers off. They install Mandrake, come across loads of glitches and bugs, and go back to Windows. Believe me, I've seen it happen. A lot.
SUSE, and to a lesser extent Fedora, are much better choices for first-timers as it gives them a good first impression of Linux. Much as I respect MandrakeSoft for their goals and various innovative ideas, they're also making Linux look shoddy and half-assed a lot of the time.
Al Qaeda has ninjas!
Mandrake's financial troubles actually have little to do with their current business model.
See their explanation here:
www.mandrakelinux.com/en/future.php3
Briefly, after a profitable first year in 1999 as a small distro maker, they let venture capitalists into the capital.
Those investors brought in a new management team which multiplied the workforce by ten almost overnight and steered the company towards e-learning.
The results of this strategy were catastrophic - Mandrake's burn rate reached 1.5M USD/month.
In April 2001, the founders resumed control of the company, refocused on Linux and started repairing the damage.
Filing for chapter 11 was a sound decision in this context, as it gave Mandrake some breathing space to get back on its feet.
Just another pissed off user trolling on a forum.
Quack, quack.
? What's with all this Anti-Red Hat business. RH giving away the desktop to MDK? Utter BS. You will see my fine fuzzy friends. Wait a few years.
You can blame LG.
But also, bear in mind that MandrakeSoft chose to use unproven, untested code in their final kernel, which started the whole thing.
Had MandrakeSoft decided to use known, proven and stable kernel releases, it would not have happened. But they didn't.
The point is: yes, LG were lame. But so were MandrakeSoft for pushing out untested code to the masses. We should be giving them official stable releases if we want to give a good impression of Linux.
" without going the redhat way of dropping the home user line entirely. "
As pointed out above they obviously didn't drop the home user.
Also I'd like to point out that Mandrake now has a policy of only allowing paying users to access Mandrake linux when it comes out. Only later does the rest of the world get access to it. Since the paying users are the only ones making Mandrake any money its not unlikely that sooner or later Mandrake will stop offering it for Free.
Red Hat still pays developers to code on a product that they give away and support with updates for Free. Red Hat Fedora may not be the best choice for businesses, but for the average Linux user who reinstalls once a year it work fine.
If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
Mandrake isn't just a great desktop distro, it's a great Server distro as well. For rpm based distros I haven't found anything that works as good.
Each server I create starts off with a minimal Mandrake installation, takes no time at all. Then I add sources for urpmi (rpm wrapper like apt-get, checks dependancies etc). Then I start building the server with just what I need to put on it. Nice clean servers. Easy to manage. Just need to add an update source, and urpmi --auto-select updates all packages.
The only reason this is currently difficult is because of the difference in libraries depending on the distro used (I'm talking about RPMs here). RedHat places their libraries in one place and calls them one thing, Mandrake does something different and SuSE yet something else. In a perfect world, you could go to someplace like rpmfind.net and find an RPM for each distro and each version of each distro. That's a monumental task, to say the least. Add to that the fact that if you choose to go get software from sourceforge.net, you get sloppy documentation with the programs - they'll forget to tell you you need a (often very unrelated) package to complete the install.
The intro is incorrect. Mandrake already had a very profitable quarter in 1999, which BTW was rather unusual for a Linux distro at the time. Then came the venture capitalists, and that was the end of profitability.
henrik
Just a small correction. Your creditors did not take it in the A**. Your creditors' other customers, who pay their bills on time, took it in the A** for you, because that's how your creditors made up for the loss.
Damn skippy, eh?
But you missed my point. Bankruptcy is a part of business, true... gloating about how your suppliers "took it in the a**" is just stupid. Period.
It's the only "large" commercial distro left in Europe, since SuSE now belongs to Novell. I don't mean to flame the US, but I sort of feel it's good for distros to be seperated in different countries, as crazy as that may sound.
I'm looking at Mandrake's two-page year-end "Newsletter to Investors" and I can qualtitatively say that there's no way one could definitively say their financial health is improving.
/. readers to know that accounting and investing or disgustingly complex topics, and most shareholders don't read the annual reports or know enough to make sense of the number and subsequently get caught up in the bandwagon without a further analysis. It's very easy to lose your money in this market simply by not looking at the books.
I'm not sure if it's just rigorous US accounting standards have kept me from the harsh realities of international investing, but I have no idea about Mandrake's debt position, their return on investment, where exactly they're generating cash flow (operating, investing, or financing activities--they're very different) and about fifty other such ratios and line-items and on average fifteen pages of notes that are given for you or very easy to figure out on companies that follow U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP).
Compare the annual report of any publically traded U.S. company (here's Intel's annual 2002 report--the PDF is 102 pages) and you'll notice that a lot more information is given to investors and shareholders. We have, off the top of my head, the usual letter to shareholders from the CEO, some "PR fluff", the balance sheet, income statement, statement of cash flows, notes to consolidated financial statements, a signed auditors report indicating you can actually trust the data, segmental data, and thorough management discussion and analysis (MD&A) in which the company's head honchos actually talk about their company's financial health.
I'm not dissing MandrakeSoft in any way, I think their software is top-notch and with the disappearance of Red Hat from the consumer line I think Mandrake has a critical role.
I think it's important for
Mandrake, for example, could be earning all their money from external financing and losing money from operations. That looks good on your income statement but if you don't check the statement of cash flows, you wouldn't know about that and you'd bee royally screwed when those external lenders come to collect. Plus, all I know about their debt situation is that they're in chapter 11--how much debt do they really have? I could think of a hundred other questions not answered by their newsletter.
Mandrake's "newsletter" does not give me the numbers I need to make that sound analysis.
Oh, and before some of you wiseguys respond to this, realise that Enron, et al. are the EXCEPTIONS, not the rules.
"[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
ARGH!
After re-reading the parent to this parent I _finally_ understood the issue.
(therin I post, guilty of reading, yet not understanding, gad...)
So there I was, handing out "How to upgrade/install packages from a HD repository" when the original issue deals with the borked/broken "UPGRADE MANDRAKE LINUX" problem. (application of palm to forehead...completed)
Yes, upgrading the entire distro is a broken mess using the Mandrake "upgrade" option from the install menus during boot/install to upgrade Mandrake Linux.
I've never had that work, ever. The sad thing is, that I know I'm not alone. It's probably some kind of never-ending issue like the KPPPD/dialer problems.
It's always been easier to just setup a "/home" partition and know that anything short of being brain-dead and formatting that partition everything should come back up, post-install.
If there's some way to do an upgrade from one version of Mandrake Linux to another version of Mandrake Linux (maybe using a combined media-source on a Windows FAT partion and have the install automagically generate a heuristics file) aside from the CD's that would be an interesting tip because it's hard to be at the machine 9 or 10 hours before it starts failing to install RPMS' and then fails the upgrade, leaving you wondering why you even bothered.
(BING! Just had an idea!)
Maybe this is what the DVD-ROM of Mandrake Linux is for. Being able to just put that puppy in the drive, click a few buttons, and then walk away...I dunno. At this point it's the caffiene talking, that or...
Every new form of media has it's own Requirimento
Thanks for the suggestion. I've used urpmi a little bit, but I'll take a closer look at it.
-- The Genesis project? What's that?