Slashdot Mirror


EU Agrees to Share Airline Passenger Data with US

securitas writes "The European Union has agreed to provide the US government with detailed airline passenger data. The agreement allows the collection of 34 pieces of data per person and limits storage of the data to three and a half years. 'The United States originally wanted to collect 60 pieces of data and keep it for 50 years.' Previously, the EU had objected to the plan because it violated EU privacy legislation, the data-protection directive. The plan is similar to the CAPPS II passenger profiling system. The data may be used for 'secondary purposes' other than anti-terrorism measures if requested from US Customs by other law enforcement agencies."

49 comments

  1. I've canceled by US trips by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I had planned to attend the FSF annual associate members meeting in Boston in March, but have scrapped that plan due to this legislation. I'll use the money to go to the Libre Software Meeting in France, and FOSDEM in Belgium instead. People shouldn't put up with this crap.

    1. Re:I've canceled by US trips by gkelman · · Score: 1

      You're obviously a muppet then. Who cares what information they store, it's not like they'll come round your house and shout "STOP GOING ON PLANES THEY'RE BAD!" and sell your cat on ebay. Even if they did, it'd be something to do.

      Fool!

    2. Re:I've canceled by US trips by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Took you long enough. I stopped visiting US last year, and I know many other Canadians who don't go there anymore (starting from as far as 2 years ago). It's just too much of a hassle with their "Patriot Act" and all the privacy invasions.

      It's too bad, the US is just shooting themselves in the foot by discouraging us from spending our money there. The ironic part is that I saved a lot of money from my days of working in US (before they discovered terrorism), and now I get to spend it all in Canada, Europe and other countries, just about anywhere except where I got it from.

    3. Re:I've canceled by US trips by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      You are delusional if you think there are enough people who are even AWARE of this new law AND pissed off enough to stop coming to the US. As a matter of course we constantly have more people coming into the US then we WANT. A pissed off Canadian or European here or there, one who is highly principled and pedantic btw, is not even a blip on the radar.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    4. Re:I've canceled by US trips by vigilology · · Score: 1

      Me too. I've done a couple of trips to the USA, renting a car, driving around, buying petrol ('gas'), renting motel rooms, buying tickets to national parks, and other activities that puts my hard earned cash into the American economy. No more, I guess. I've heard too many horror stories lately and moves like this only serve to add fuel to the fire (or add to the smoke).

    5. Re:I've canceled by US trips by mbstone · · Score: 1

      As an American I'm sorry you feel this way. Please do visit our country, I'm sure you will feel welcomed by nearly everyone. While it's hard to defend some of the stuff our government does, airport security is a necessary evil and you can't avoid it merely by boycotting the US. More to the point, right now Euros are expensive, and US Dollars cheap. Visit America and save 20% on everything!!

    6. Re:I've canceled by US trips by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Yeh, this is the problem. Boston is a nice place, and I'd love to go over and meet the FSF folks again. But I just don't like funding the regime.

      It's like buying CDs. You get the music, and 50cent does go to the artist, but 10 dollars/euros is given the the RIAA.

      This was partly explained in the book "Why do people hate America?". (Not a very good book.) To foreigners, America is represented by it's foreign policy, and as a democracy, it's foreign policy is understood to be the will of the people.

      In Belgium I met a guy that also wouldn't go to America, his reason was that every dollar he spent would be paying for an American bullet in a foreign country.

      It's not personal. I don't dislike Americans.

      In a few years time, the EU could be as bad, and I'd understand then if people said they didn't want to come to the EU. But I wouldn't leave the EU, I'll stay and fix it, like I hope Americans will fix America.

    7. Re:I've canceled by US trips by particule · · Score: 1

      As director of programs of LSM 2004, I would like to thank the US government for its support to a quality event organised in France... :-)))))))

  2. Sheesh by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The data may be used for 'secondary purposes' other than anti-terrorism measures if requested from US Customs by other law enforcement agencies."

    Like McDonald's late-night security guards. Or anyone who whips up some FBI letterhead and sends a fax. You'd be surprised how easily organizations will fling about our beverage selections and hotel porno rentals without a care for our privacy or their sense of morality.

    Can anyone think of any act, any act at all, where a United States citizen is guaranteed privacy by law? Are phone calls with your lawyer and conversations with your psychiatrist still honored, or is that gone too?

    Hm. I wonder if I can get Ted Kennedy's hotel porno rentals. Anyone got a template for FBI letterhead?

    1. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're better off without a guaranteed legal right to privacy. The powerful will just ignore it because they operate outside or above the law (they are "privileged"), while they will use THEIR right to privacy to shut you down if you try and investigate and publicise the crooked shit they get up to.

      I'm all for an expectation of privacy in certain situations. I'm all for the right to use privacy-enhancing tools like PGP so long as there is no legal recourse once the cat is out of the bag. But an absolute LEGAL right to privacy is very, very dangerous.

    2. Re:Sheesh by the+Man+in+Black · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The right to privacy would be a double-edged sword. I can see corporations claiming right to privacy on business data and the like. I don't think that corporations should be viewed as "citizens" under the law anyway, but that's me.

      I still, however, maintain that a constitutionally guaranteed right to individual privacy (encompassing medical information, all activities in or around a home or residence, purchases and other financial information, and library rentals) would do more good, especially under our current neo-Draconian administration, with it's flagrant disregard for the individual.

      Sorry, that almost turned into a political rant. *goes to get more coffee*

    3. Re:Sheesh by uradu · · Score: 1

      > Can anyone think of any act, any act at all, where a United States citizen is guaranteed privacy by law?

      Stealing, murder, ana1 s3x in 34 of the 50 states...the list goes on.

    4. Re:Sheesh by radja · · Score: 1

      >I can see corporations claiming right to privacy on business data and the like.

      they already do, usually claiming "company secrets". privacy is no more than the right to have a secret, but privacy is a HUMAN right. and companies are not human.

      --

      No one can understand the truth until he drinks of coffee's frothy goodness.
      --Sheikh Abd-Al-Kadir, 1587
    5. Re:Sheesh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just about every western nation already has enshrined rights to privacy. It seems to be working well for the rest of us.

      The scary thing here is that what was protecting us was keeping the data out of the US: coz once data gets there our privacy laws no longer keep us safe.

      This is an issue that will continue and escalate. The common example is: if a corporate can just ship data about be to their US office then all privacy protection I had under law is lost.

      Sean

  3. Source of all that data? by cicho · · Score: 3, Funny

    60 pieces of data sounds like a lot. From the article:

    "European officials had balked at the U.S. request to get access to additional information airlines may collect that could reveal more detailed personal data, such as medical conditions and political affiliation."

    This implies that airlines have that information in the first place. Political affiliation? How can they get such information, and why do they? This is a concern even before they start making it available to anyone.

    I voted for my country to join the EU. I would have reconsidered this vote today.

    --
    "Only the small secrets need to be protected. The big ones are kept secret by public incredulity." - Marshall McLuhan
    1. Re:Source of all that data? by Tune · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > How can they get such information, and why do they? This is a concern even before they start making it available to anyone.

      Inaccurate data gathered by sloppy / unlawful means could make US customs using
      the date all the more dangerous.

      --
      To know that you know what you know, and that you do not know what you do not know, that is true wisdom -- Scooby Doo
      [...] as we know, there are known knowns, there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns -- the ones we don't know we don't know. -- Donald Rumsfeld
      (Whatever)

    2. Re:Source of all that data? by uradu · · Score: 2, Funny

      > 60 pieces of data sounds like a lot

      What really puzzled them was the request for movie watching and shopping habits.

    3. Re:Source of all that data? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 5, Insightful


      I've read a few articles expounding on this; the point wasn't _just_ that it violates a principle of privacy and sovereignty, but also puts forward the question, "do you realize exactly what kind of data airlines collect on you?"

      Think about it. Dietary habits, travel patterns. Possibly medical history. What else? What do you think ticket agents are writing on those screens you can't see during checkin, when they're frantically typing away? I don't know, do you? The consensus appeared to be that airlines keep some pretty quirky stuff on file about you, including the occasional nasty comment.

      What kind of information do you give away when signing up for frequent flyer programs, including that airline miles credit card? Bang, there go your spending habits.

      Not sure I'm comfortable with Uncle Sam having that as a matter of routine.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  4. What's new? by Tune · · Score: 5, Insightful


    EU legislation is one thing, but most major European airlines have freely shared ALL passenger info with the US authorities for almost two years, despite questions and objections by various political bodies. The message is clear: If you care about liberty, privacy and those sort of things and you're not an American, than just stay out. Thanks to the 9/11 attacks, the Bush administration now has world-wide carte blance to invade anyone's privacy.
    </Rant>

    --
    Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable -- John F. Kennedy

    1. Re:What's new? by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Insightful


      Good point you make. Unfortunately, that's not entirely an option for a lot of us.

      Bush aside (a lot of this horseshit's been going on for years before he entered the picture--think "war on drugs", "encryption export controls", etc.) there's a long-running problem a lot of Europeans have with the dichotomy of "US the beacon of liberty and progress" and US home of John Ashcroft & his ilk."

      I'm a US-Swiss dual citizen living in Europe--I've seriously considered giving up my US passport due to ideological concerns. I haven't done so, as I have a lot of close family in the US, whom I like to see, and stand to inherit some property. Sort of a conundrum, no?

      Likewise, it's not much of a choice if you live in a country which has something like biometric identification in its passports mandated by the US departmen of . What if I never wanted to enter the US, but maybe decided to head over to France for the weekend? Tough cookies, please place your retina here.

      --
      Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
    2. Re:What's new? by Tune · · Score: 1

      So true.
      This is not something you can hide from; it just appears to be. Currently, I work for a Dutch company with offices around the world, approx. half in the US. Until now my employer hasn't forced me to visit US offices, but I am reluctant to go there. I figure I can always quit my job and start working for a locally oriented company, but European and Amercan economies are so closely linked that eventually you'll be affected by US policies directly, or -- as you pointed out by the biometric ID example -- indirectly.

      I guess you can't avoid the effects of the US's abuse of power, but you migh be able to change people minds by objecting to it. Or could it?

    3. Re:What's new? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      Sounds like someone still hasn't gotten used to the fact that the USA is the new Global Hegemon!

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    4. Re:What's new? by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Do you plan on committing a crime in the future? If not then what makes you think your privacy is so important to protect in the first place?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    5. Re:What's new? by misterpies · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Firstly, what's crime to do with it. It's not a crime to be a communist, but they won't let a foreigner into the US if they have been. Now they'll be able to screen out anyone who fits into their perceived profile of a threat. You're a vegetarian and a member of Greenpeace? Must be one of those anti-capitalist protesters.

      Second, you don't know what's going to be a crime in the future. One day you're donating to a Pakistani religious charity, the next day you're supporting terrorism. The law ain't static.

      --
      The author of this post asserts his moral rights.
    6. Re:What's new? by Tune · · Score: 1

      You don't have to commit a crime to go to jail. In those millions of files made for airline passengers, someone is bound to make a mistake in filling in the crosses or someone is bound to interpret a form incorrectly.

      If all goes well, you'll be out in a day with appologies, but there is nothing keeping the Bush admin from sending you to Guantanamo bay and keeping you there until you confess.

      If you think privacy is an issue only to criminals you've never though about the Gestapo, KGB, Spanish inquisition, McArthy's men, Brittain's "anti-terrorism" laws or JWB's current administration.

      ---
      A conclusion is simply the place where someone got tired of thinking

    7. Re:What's new? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Im' pretty sure it's McCarthy, not McArthy. Mc or Mac is an Irish/Scottish Gaelic prefix meaning "son-of", similar to O' (son-of) and Ni (daughter-of), or the Norman-Irish "Fitz" (illegitimate-son-of)

  5. What are the data? by torpor · · Score: 1

    Anyone know? If they're gonna know it about me, I want to know it about me as well.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    1. Re:What are the data? by mopslik · · Score: 1

      ...and why so long?

      The United States originally wanted to collect 60 pieces of data and keep it for 50 years.

      What pratical purpose would be served by knowing that I ordered chicken 50 years ago?

    2. Re:What are the data? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anyone who voluntarily orders airline chicken must be a terrorist!

  6. well that's all lovely but... by cassidyc · · Score: 3, Informative

    doesn`t stop anyone from blowing up the plane in mid flight.

    Still, at least they'll have all the details of the deceased.

    More liberties given up for the illusion of greater security

    CJC

    1. Re:well that's all lovely but... by Alsee · · Score: 2, Funny

      doesn`t stop anyone from blowing up the plane in mid flight.
      Still, at least they'll have all the details of the deceased.


      Soon to be overheard at a crash cleanup and analysis site:

      Worker 1: Man, they were ripped to shreds. The peices are so small we haven't been able to match up a single identification yet.
      Worker 2: Yeah. About the biggest peice we've found is a weiner wearing a glow-in-the-dark condom, heh.
      Worker 1: Wait a minute, did you say wearing a glow-in-the-dark condom?
      Worker 2: Yeah, a real pisser, huh? [laughs]
      Worker 1: [shuffles pages of passenger info]
      Worker 1: YO ROB! OVER HERE! WE'VE IDENTIFIED ONE!

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  7. well by sofar · · Score: 4, Interesting


    Do we European get the US data too then ??????

    1. Re:well by malaire · · Score: 1

      Not before terrorists destroy Pisa or Eiffel.

    2. Re:well by sofar · · Score: 1


      but after the massacre's in Istanbul then?

  8. Re:About Joe Schludnick by fuzzybunny · · Score: 0

    This is actually pretty funny.

    I've always wondered what stewardesses talk about when they withdraw to their little alcove...

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  9. My experience by ciaran_o_riordan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I stopped visiting US last year .. It's just too much of a hassle with their "Patriot Act" and all the privacy invasions.

    I went to Boston in march 2003. There were four check points between the plane and the outside of the airport. At the second checkpoint, the security guy ran out of forms for me to fill out so he let me pass without filling in a form.

    When I got to the next checkpoint, I was taken aside by two cops and asked loads of questions because I didn't have the form from the previous checkpoint. Clearly I was a good candidate for terrorism. The questions were pointlessly invasive (my job, my annual wage!, my country of origin, any family in the US, etc.). I didn't mind giving the answers (I could have lied), but it was such a stupid process.

    What conclusions could they possibly draw from my verbal answer to "What is your annual income?". I'm sure Bin Laden would really be caught out by that one :-)

    1. Re:My experience by apatrick · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is my understanding that the purpose of questions like "your job" and "your annual wage" and "any family in the US" is to determine your likelihood of LEAVING the US. That is, the screening is to prevent illegal immigration, and to not search for terrorists per se.

    2. Re:My experience by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      What conclusions could they possibly draw from my verbal answer to "What is your annual income?".

      They don't care about your actual income. They're just looking for a range, and if you can give a valid answer.

      For instance, a Turk comes to the US, purporting to be an American, and is asked his job and his annual income.
      He might hem and haw for a few seconds doing the conversion in his head (strike 1)
      And he may well be off by a factor of 10 or 100.

      "Job?"
      "computer programmer"
      "annual income?"
      [let's see...in Turkey, that's 57,000,000,000 lira - in US$ that's...] "4,000!"(strike 2)

      "Right, buddy...lets go."
      57 billion TRL is ~$40,000

  10. Greetings from Airstrip One by cattlepr0d · · Score: 4, Informative

    We have this, too.

    The US and UK governments: bringing freedom and democracy to the world.

    --
    R Tape loading error, 0:1
  11. And does anyone seriously believe by gillbates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That the US will delete this data when the three years are over? More likely, it will be "removed" from one database only to go into another more classified database at the NSA or FBI.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  12. welcome to the land of the free by MadMirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... with "free" of course meaning that authorities freely access any information about anyone.

    Don't think that only data from non-americans is collected, it is data from anyone coming in via an European airline.

    It's disappointing to see that the American public doesn't give a damn, and even more that the European Parliament is likely to give in to another US bullying.

  13. Hrm by vigilology · · Score: 1

    So that information was once considered private, but now isn't. Funny, I don't remember being asked.

    1. Re:Hrm by roshamon · · Score: 1

      There is no privacy anymore.Long before 9/11 the world`s citizens have been under extreme scrutiny.The snooping has only been intensified and legitimized on broader and deeper levels.Privacy is now a dirty word. We can it seems either forget it. Or learn to live with it. Surveillance cameras.Internet tracking,Spammings, credit card theives,corporate customer data.bank.DNA gleanings ...and the list goes on the only interesting thing is where will it end. We are just waiting for the next chapter.(huh!)

  14. Pissed off?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I believe you're the delusional one. Nobody's pissed off, at least no to that point. We're not boycotting the country, we just can't be bothered to put up with the risks and the hassles of a visit to US.

    I believe just about everybody in the world is AWARE of the Patriot Act and the new policies USA has put in place for questioning visitors, take your head out of the sand.

    And the people who WANT to come to US, they're mostly from poor countries. They want to come to US, make money and send it back home, that's why your countrymen aren't that thrilled to have them. But the rich people, they're not lining up to come to US and spend their money, not anymore.

  15. My last flight was my last flight by bitty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was our honeymoon to Hawaii, so there wasn't much choice there. We drive everywhere now, the hassle and total invasion of our privacy just isn't worth it. In one airport, they even had me put one foot on this "detector", that for all I know did absolutely nothing. It was just a box with an opaque piece of white plexiglass with the outline of a foot that said "place foot here". No wires coming out of it at all, and it didn't appear to be plugged in. The security guy just watched me do it and said thank you. My wife and I were both pulled aside and searched twice each way by very rude people that seemed more interested in our undergarments than actually looking for anything dangerous.

    Screw 'em. I'll spend my money elsewhere.

    1. Re:My last flight was my last flight by /dev/trash · · Score: 1

      But what happens when you get downsized and have to start flying to job interviews?

    2. Re:My last flight was my last flight by bitty · · Score: 1

      But what happens when you get downsized and have to start flying to job interviews?

      That's the wonderful thing about being self employed. I don't have to worry about that.

  16. To catch a foreigner IN THE US: got to scan ALL US by openmtl · · Score: 1
    A crowd is a safe place to hide. It doesn't matter how many pieces of data they have its the quality the intelligence. There is BIG catch here for you US citizens.

    If someone bad gets into the US then do you think they'll retain that same persona ? No. They'll swap IDs. For them to be caught again given they get picked up on e.g. a speeding ticket, then the fun starts.

    Superficially assuming that their (fake) ID is a good American ID then the only way to pick up if this is really valid is to perform some biometric scans on that "American" and see what comes up.

    Its so funny: though its us foreigners who have to get into the US with our biometric enabled passports its actually ALL Americans domestically who'll end up being scanned else how can the Feds actually pick up the overstaying foreigners !.

    Doh ! Also do you think that someone who intends to commit suicide in a very public way gives a shit that they get picked up with a dodgy ID. Probably not as my guess is that they'll have two goals:

    1) sleep until called for. Make friends with everyone especially "good" Americans. Just wander around for a few years, leaving a paper trail a mile long. If caught then watch amused as couple of hundred Feds spin out trying to gather "intelligence" implicating many other Americans by association on the way.

    2) if woken then visit what you have found to be the ideal target and have fun.

    --