Slashdot Mirror


25,000-Ton Amphibious Spam Relay

hormiga writes "The amphibious transport dock ship San Antonio incorporates the latest quality of life standards for the embarked Marines and sailors, including the sit-up berth, ship services mall, a fitness center and learning resource center/electronic classroom and Unsolicited Bulk E-Mail. Now the Chinese can relay their spam through U.S. military naval vessels." Well, Chinese spammers, anyhow.

79 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. That's an act of WAR! by Thud457 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope http://www.news.navy.mil has a sense of humor about the dreaded /. DDOS attack that they're under!!! /lamer

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:That's an act of WAR! by swordboy · · Score: 4, Funny
      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  2. Your tax dollars hard at work by ForestGrump · · Score: 5, Interesting

    relaying spam to your inbox.

    This is the ideal goverment. The tax dollars working directly for its citizens.
    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
    1. Re:Your tax dollars hard at work by $ASANY · · Score: 5, Informative
      You've got to understand the situation. The Navy-Marine Corps Internet project and BTBest (at least for the MSC) TCP/IP commo suite got thrown at these ships without a lot of regard to the technical resources required to manage the whole ball of wax. Each of these ships has a rack of MS Windows boxes managing LAN, commo, logistics and everything else, and they have some Chief managing the equipment who is decidedly not a network engineer. On top of that he's got to play DBA for Sybase and Oracle databases, manage numerous applications, and deal with backup and disaster management. It's too much to realistically ask a guy who's background is a lot more "sailor" than "LAN/Database/application server adminstrator. At least not while we're paying senior enlisted guys what we are.

      These technicial-draftees are extraordinarily busy. They're asked to manage really complex systems that are not terribly reliable. MS Exchange and Win2k require good people to keep them going, but throw database replication systems and the rest of their suite on top, and they spend more of their time crying for help to shoreside contractors than getting things fixed. That their MS Exchange server got penetrated is hardly a surprise given the number of fires these guys are regularly trying to keep under control.

      If they can get professional DBA's and Network Engineers on each ship and this happens, then I'd raise hell. But there aren't a whole lot of MSCEs and DBAs that want to go on 9 month sea deployments of 16-hour days with the starting salary of an E-3, which I guess is about $800/month. In the meantime, scream at Lockheed Martin, the contractor for the Navy-Marine Corps Internet (NMCI) project, which has hosed up more than they have fixed. NMCI dictates identical configurations across all systems, which makes it really likely that the vulnerability we see here exists virtually everywhere in the Navy. Lockheed designed it this way, and got paid an enormous pile of cash to do so.

      Maybe they owe us a refund?

    2. Re:Your tax dollars hard at work by rabbits77 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Do you really think anybody gets paid $800 a month in the military? Maybe if they had incurred multiple severe fines for screwing up royally. I don't know what it is nowadays but when I was an E-1 about 10 years ago the pay was *struggles to remember* more like $1400 a month for the lowiest of the low E-1 nobody.

  3. am I the only one... by bluenova · · Score: 5, Funny

    who pictured a giant, floating, can of Hormel's spicy meat concoction, peeling back it's top to release aircraft and attack vehicles? My GI Joe collection never had one of those...

    1. Re:am I the only one... by Odin's+Raven · · Score: 2, Funny
      Am I the only one who thinks that any post starting with "Am I the only one..." is going to contain a thought that nobody else would ever, ever think?

      Errrr, hang on a sec...Error: process 'raven' terminated abnormally, infinite recursion detected

      --
      A marriage is always made up of two people who are prepared to swear that only the other one snores.
  4. Amphibious Spam Relay? by Kirk+Troll · · Score: 4, Funny

    SOYLENT SPAM IS FROGS!!!

  5. Wrong move. by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny

    2000 gung-ho, pissed of marines with landing craft, naval support and air support vs pasty chinese spammer with goverment welfare support.

    1. Re:Wrong move. by Uma+Thurman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Another wrong move: Marines hate it when their ship gets slashdotted.

      --
      This is America, damnit. Speak Spanish!
    2. Re:Wrong move. by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      pasty chinese spammer with goverment welfare support

      Who knows kung fu.

      I mean, if we're gonna pull out racist stereotypes, let's pull them all out, huh?

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    3. Re:Wrong move. by rifter · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just give me 20 aryan Waffen-SS men with real skills and discipline. Beats that stuff you scratched off the streets ("marines") anytime.

      Yeah, those Waffen SS.. they sure showed those Marines a thing or two in WWII... oh wait...

  6. Yeesh... by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Funny

    Obviously, instead of sealing of ports, some poor yoeman went and sealed portholes...

    yuk yuk yuk

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  7. "Red" Chinese? by GnrlFajita · · Score: 5, Funny
    Come on, now, keep up with the times. This spammer seems a little to capitalistic to describe as a "red."

    Somebody's watched to many Cold-War-era action movies.

    --
    When we remember we are all mad, the mysteries disappear and life stands explained.
    Mark Twain
  8. Jeeze by zeroprime · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...I just don't even know what to say
    Perhaps we need to create a 'great firewall' of our own.

    And to think that our tax dollars are being subverted to send spam.

    --
    Hey! come on! try dividing it by anything!
  9. Ignore them.. by Sir+Pallas · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Just add the military to your email blacklist. They've been asking for it, I'm sure. I already have to filter most of what they say, anyway. I don't see why email should be any different. (Maybe the next line of ships will come with an oil spill too.)

  10. Blacklisting the United States Navy? by tekiegreg · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well if anyone tries blacklisting the ships, I guess there'd be a Tomahawk in their building in the name of national security :-p

    But in all honesty, I'm sure (or at least I hope) more attention is given to the confidential systems than the SMTP server that the troops play around with...

    --
    ...in bed
    1. Re:Blacklisting the United States Navy? by trentblase · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have my spam filter set to bounce all Tomahawk missles. If one does happen to get through, abuse@navy.mil is going to be hearing from me.

    2. Re:Blacklisting the United States Navy? by srmalloy · · Score: 4, Funny
      I have my spam filter set to bounce all Tomahawk missles. If one does happen to get through, abuse@navy.mil is going to be hearing from me.

      The Tomahawk's warhead does make for (if you will pardon the clicheed phrase) the 'mother of all DOS attacks', though...
  11. Part of the plan? by Elyjah · · Score: 5, Funny

    Perhaps the spamming facilities on the ship are part of a US initiative to disable enemy email infrastructure?

    1. Re:Part of the plan? by spicedhamhawg · · Score: 3, Funny

      I doubt it. All they'd have to do to disable enemy email infrastructure is give them free copies of MS Exchange.

  12. slashdotters in the military? by prgrmr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Could be:

    telnet 205.67.231.235 25
    Trying...
    Connected to 205.67.231.235.
    Escape character is '^]'.
    421 avnavfw.AVONDALE Sorry, the firewall does not provide mail service to you.
    Connection closed.

    1. Re:slashdotters in the military? by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 2, Insightful
      421 avnavfw.AVONDALE Sorry, the firewall does not provide mail service to you.
      It seems like they can't figure out the difference between a mail server and a firewall. If you can connect to the port it is not firewalled off, rather the mail server prevents you from using it.

      Reminds me of the slew of buzzwords used in the movie Swordfish.
      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    2. Re:slashdotters in the military? by mattdm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If you can connect to the port it is not firewalled off, rather the mail server prevents you from using it.

      How do you know the firewall isn't generating that message? A firewall can dd more than just drop packets.

    3. Re:slashdotters in the military? by prgrmr · · Score: 2, Informative

      in other words, it's a closed relay and this whole story is a non-story.

      It was closed when I hit it. Can't say how long it had been in that state, hence my speculative subject line.

    4. Re:slashdotters in the military? by GoofyBoy · · Score: 2, Funny

      >Reminds me of the slew of buzzwords used in the movie Swordfish.

      The tv show 24 really basterizes computer terms.

      "Mount the filter to my screen so I can route it through the log files."

      Still a good show.

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    5. Re:slashdotters in the military? by cscx · · Score: 3, Informative

      Maybe it's an SMTP proxy.

      It seems like YOU can't figure out what you're talking about.

    6. Re:slashdotters in the military? by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 3, Funny
      It seems like they can't figure out the difference between a mail server and a firewall. If you can connect to the port it is not firewalled off, rather the mail server prevents you from using it.

      You sound like a typical "I installed ipchains on my Linux box so I am a firewall admin" n00b. Ever hear of proxy firewalls? Sheesh.

    7. Re:slashdotters in the military? by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      have I got a deal on a bridge for you!

      Bridges are passe - tell him it's a router :o)

    8. Re:slashdotters in the military? by DJ+Rubbie · · Score: 2, Informative

      Error 421 is an error code returned by a mail server (or an SMTP proxy, if some of you are *that* picky) that means service unavailable.

      --
      Please direct all bug reports to /dev/null
    9. Re:slashdotters in the military? by jdreed1024 · · Score: 4, Informative
      It seems like they can't figure out the difference between a mail server and a firewall. If you can connect to the port it is not firewalled off, rather the mail server prevents you from using it.

      Um, no. It is possible for a firewall to exist such that if you connect to it on port 25, and you're authorized to talk to that site's mail server, it passes your packets through the firewall and on to the mail server. If you are not authorized, it either drops your packets on the floor, or respond with a message such as this one. 421 is the RFC822 code for "service not available". Just because a machine answers on 25 does not mean it's a "mail server" (tm). What it's saying is "I am not going to provide mail service to you because I don't know your IP address." 'Mail service" simply means "access to some sort of MTA". It does not imply that the machine is in fact a mail server masquerading as a firewall. There are such things a proxy firewalls, and that's clearly what this is.

      --
      There is no sig, there is only Zuul.
    10. Re:slashdotters in the military? by Medieval · · Score: 4, Informative

      That's a message from Symantec Enterprise Firewall (Raptor Firewall.)

      Its an SMTP proxy; if you try to connect to the firewall or an SMTP server on the far side of it on port 25 (or other configured ports) and there's no rule allowing it, you get this message.

    11. Re:slashdotters in the military? by MarcQuadra · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was with a few friends at the bar, one said he was gonna bail to go catch '24' and I asked if it was really that good. He guaranteed that I'd fall in love with it if I gave it an episode, so I left too. We get in and turn on '24' and I could only bear it for about 15 minutes, the mangled geekspeak was too much for me to handle.

      There's another 'antiterror' drama on too, one episode they landed a cargo plane on a carrier (which has been done, once). The show was just SO lame though, there was NO regard for proper portrayal of millitary protocol or the technical limitations of ANY equipment. I was just sitting there thinking, "what good is it if the hero's guns never run out of ammo and their cargo planes can dodge missiles?"

      I think hollywood would be well served if they hired a kid for $30,000 / year to sit in with the writers and make sure there was enough realism in the shows to make them... acceptable.

      --
      "Sometimes, I think Trent just needs a cup of hot chocolate and a blankie." -Tori Amos on Nine Inch Nails
    12. Re:slashdotters in the military? by zangdesign · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hollywood isn't about technical accuracy - it's about making the stuff on the screen interesting by use of special effects, tricks, gags, mummery, and occasionally acting.

      When you stare at the production script, there isn't a whole lot of detail there. The things like how many times a gun fires and damage effects and whatnot are not up to the writer in most cases. It's all decided by whoever they've hired to handle effects, or sometimes the director, and occasionally by someone with real expertise in the field, but more likely enough expertise in the field, but more expertise in keeping it interesting.

      Or to put it another way

      Technical accuracy is boring to most theatre-goers.

      --
      To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
    13. Re:slashdotters in the military? by Wolfrider · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Technical accuracy is boring to most theatre-goers.

      --I find your lack of faith in theatre-goers... Disturbing.

      --
      .
      == WolfriderV6 == I'm willing to admit that *I just might* be wrong... Are you??
  13. This is a good thing! by Guano_Jim · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the event of Taiwan's declaring independence from the mainland, we can instantly flood Beijing with ads for penis enlargement!

    That will slow down the PRC armies long enough for us to convince them that they don't really need Tawian and should focus on switching over to an economy based on turkey guts.

    Evangelizing turkey guts since mid-2003.

  14. Text of the Article by iamweezman · · Score: 5, Informative

    The ship supports the Marine Corps "mobility triad," the LCAC
    (Landing Craft Air Cushion vehicle), the "Triple A-V" (AAAV -
    Advanced Amphibious Assault Vehicle) and the MV-22 (Osprey
    tiltrotor aircraft),

    and (apparently) spammers in Guandong. Rd China.

    Furthermore, San Antonio incorporates the latest quality of life
    standards for the embarked Marines and sailors, including the sit-up
    berth, ship services mall, a fitness center and learning resource
    center/electronic classroom

    and Unsolicited Bulk E-Mail.

    Of course, it's possible that one of the OTHER eleven ships, still under
    construction, is the Avondale, LA dot-MIL spam relay, or trojaned boat,
    or some nice-and-secure Windows box in the construction drydocks, running
    Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail Service Version 5.5.2653.13

    But doesn't it make all Americans feel all fuzzy and secure that a
    Red Chinese spammer can abuse a US Naval Vessel of one of the newest
    designs, to relay his "business proposition"?

    Perhaps it's tied to the USS Green Bay, instead? or USS New Orleans?
    http://www.navsea.navy.mil/newswire_content.asp?tx tDataID=8963&txtTypeID=2

    The USS Mesa Verde, seems to be in Mississippi, instead
    http://www.navsea.navy.mil/newswire_content.asp?tx tDataID=8663&txtTypeID=2

    But the E-Mail headers finger the USS San Antonio, LPD 17, already
    christened, and due for commissioning some time this coming year.

    LPD 17 Looks Like a "Gator"

    http://www.navsea.navy.mil/newswire_content.asp?tx tDataID=8596&txtTypeID=2

    but from here, it just looks like another spammer.

    [SPECIMEN]
    H: Return-Path:
    H: Received: from avnavfw.lpd17.navsea.navy.mil
    H: (avnavfw.pms317.navy.mil [05.67.231.235])
    H: by mail.gtcs.com (8.12.10/8.11.3/gtcs-6.3.8) with SMTP
    H: id hBG65HO8091853
    H: for ; Mon, 15 Dec 2003 23:06:39 -0700 (MST)
    H: (envelope-from: )
    H: X-Authentication-Warning: serv.gtcs.com: Host
    H: avnavfw.pms317.navy.mil [205.67.231.235]
    H: claimed to be avnavfw.lpd17.navsea.navy.mil
    H: Received: from no.name.available by anavfw.lpd17.navsea.navy.mil
    H: via smtpd (for [209.181.16.1]) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 05:53:08 UT
    H: Received: from avnavfw.AVONDALE (205.67.231.5 [205.67.231.5]) by
    H: swn-email.lpd17.navy.mil with SMTP (Microsoft Exchange Internet Mail
    H: Service Version 5.5.2653.13)
    H: id YY2BDP4P; Tue, 16 Dec 2003 00:07:28 -0600
    H: From: "HuatonE-ScooterCo.,Ltd"
    H: Received: from [61.145.234.62] by avnavfw.AVONDALE
    H: via smtpd (for [205.66.99.30]) with SMTP; 16 Dec 2003 05:51:47 UT
    H: Subject: Re.About our new product
    H: Content-Type: text/html
    H: Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 13:57:41 +0800
    H: X-Priority: 3

    [extract from HTML body]
    B: Our company specializes in exporting electric & gas scooters, which
    B: are most popular with our customers at home and abroad. Now we are
    B: writing to offer you an opportunity to develop a mutual trade. If
    B: you are interested in establishing business relations with us, please
    B: let us know your requirements. Then we would like to forward catalogues
    B: as well as detailed information to you, and offer the best price to
    B: you. We assure you of our best attention to your any inquiries.
    B: We anticipate your early response in respect.

    B: Huaton E-scooter Co., Ltd.
    B: Room.B-202,Building Si-Hai-Ming-Yuan
    B: Burg Weiji,Zone Gongbei
    B: City Zhuhai 519020
    B: Province Kwangtung,China
    B: Tel:86-756-821-6922
    B: Fax:86-756-888-3037 ...

    Spam support by:
    The US Navy, Avondale Lousiana Shipyard, Frewall, a

  15. San Antonio has NOT been compromised by MyNameIsFred · · Score: 5, Informative

    I hate to destroy part of a good story. But San Antonio is NOT, repeat NOT the spam relay. LANs on ships are NOT connected to the Internet. The military has its own non-public networks for ships. Furthermore, San Antonio has NOT been delivered to the Navy. It is still under construction. That's the good news. The bad news, is that a Navy site has been compromised. The headers give us some clues. avnavfw.pms317.navy.mil is a Navy address. PMS317 is the Navy program office responsible for building the San Antonio class of ships. Avondale Shipyard is where the ships are built.

    1. Re:San Antonio has NOT been compromised by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

      I hate to destroy part of a good story.

      I think the proper terminology in this case would be, "I hate to torpedo part of a good story."

      Then again... maybe not.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    2. Re:San Antonio has NOT been compromised by jmkaza · · Score: 4, Informative

      LANs on ships are NOT connected to the Internet

      I spent a year on ship, and sent/received email, surfed the web, and filed my maintainance reports and supply requests from the same pc. There was limits on what we could do, but we were definitely connected to the net.

    3. Re:San Antonio has NOT been compromised by beefneck9 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Most commands/ships keep a strict separation between personal and official use computers. This includes using completely separate LAN's onboard for each purpose. Surfing eBay or watching Paris get freaky while reading the Steam Plant Manual just won't happen. unclass stuff, sure, go ahead. But if you were doing anything mixing personal stuff on a classified station, you must be talking to us from USP Leavenworth's library.

  16. Special. by sparkie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Naval ships have had internet access before this ship. As a Marine I've sent and received E-Mails from more than 1 or 2 ships in the fleet.

    1. Re:Special. by xyzzy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, but the distinction here is that the Email does not generally come delivered directly from the *ship*, but from some stateside server, probably part of NMCI (the Navy Marine Corps Internet). There are N firewalls between here and there, if for no other reason than the bandwidth from ship to shore is INCREDIBLY small (like: 256kbit for the entire ship, secure, classified, public, you name it). It would make a LOUSY spam relay.

    2. Re:Special. by Teflonatron · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You were using NIPRNET, which is connected to the Internet at only a few (very controlled) locations in the world...

      Any sensitve IP communications are handled over SIPRNET, which is never (or should never be) connected to NIPRNET.

  17. I've heard by Lipongo · · Score: 2, Funny

    Of spam in a Can, but never spam in a boat.

    --
    -Certified TechnoWeinie
  18. At least .mil servers are good at relaying spam... by jamonterrell · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...because they certainly aren't relaying webpages very good at the moment.

    Someone want to post the article?

    --
    I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
  19. MAKE IT BIGGER 39586-184=50 by trentblase · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's true, women prefer men with LARGE GOVERNMENTS. Communism can help you regrow hair, and in communist societies there's no reason to spam!

  20. Secure chat rooms, unsecure email by Chatmag · · Score: 3, Interesting

    As we reported in our annual report of the top ten Internet chat topics for 2003, the U.S. Navy uses secure chat rooms for communication on board ships.

    Apparently they missed securing their email server. I wonder if keelhauling is still allowed.

    --
    Pete Carr Owner Chatmag.com
  21. Man your inboxes... by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 4, Funny

    You'd end up with 2000 Marines busy churning through hundreds of penis enlargement, bigger boobs, refinancing, debt-free, horny teens, etc ads. I expect they'd resent the penis enlargement ads the most.

    Sure they wouldn't attack Nigeria though? After all, they'd want to collect on those millions they were promised by Mr Sebeko, cousin of the ex-Finance Minister.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Man your inboxes... by mpe · · Score: 4, Funny

      You'd end up with 2000 Marines busy churning through hundreds of penis enlargement, bigger boobs, refinancing, debt-free, horny teens, etc ads. I expect they'd resent the penis enlargement ads the most.

      Since there are spammers who spam about "anti-spam" tools does this mean arms dealers will be getting in on the act.
      "To cut down on yore SPAM you can now buy everything from torpedos to nuklear kruise missiles at a *BARGIN* price..."

    2. Re:Man your inboxes... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Funny
      Imagine being addressed as "Mr. Sea-Man..." by one of those ads...

      ouch*ow! that hurts!

      --
      C|N>K
  22. What was that grade again..... by common+middle+name · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Didn't the DOD just get a grade of F
    for network security?

  23. As soon as.. by herrvinny · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As soon as I saw this on /.'s front page, I went "Oh dear God"... Anyone else think, when glancing at the headline, that spammers had purchased a retired boat, put it in international waters, and spammed away from it?

    Then I RTFA'ed. Pretty sad that military servers are compromised by nothing other than some stupid spammers. Makes you think what Chinese or other rogue government sponsored hackers could do to our systems if we even went to war with them....

    The next war, if we fight it with a non african or Middle Eastern country, is going to involve cyber assualts. Hope the Pentagon is going to firm up their defenses more, both electronically and physically. Maybe they can even get the services of Akamai; they're practically DDOS-proof.

    1. Re:As soon as.. by d-rock · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have a feeling that the important systems on the ship are completely isolated from anything with Internet access. I knew a guy who installed servers at military bases and each person would have two computers at their desk, one connected to the Internet (through a firewall and some other stuff), and one on the sensitive side. Also something like the screen on the sensitive side had wallpaper like "Danger!Danger!Danger!Danger!", etc.

      Derek

      --
      Don't Panic...
  24. They have a sense of humor by muyuubyou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...when they are using ASP. Let's hope they're using the Apache port, otherwise they would be using *shudder* ISS and winbloze.

    1. Re:They have a sense of humor by Ianoo · · Score: 4, Funny

      ISS? Their sites are based on the space station now?! I had heard it was running the mythical WinNT4 SP6...

    2. Re:They have a sense of humor by daniel23 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      according to netcraft www.news.navy.mil runs Microsoft-IIS/5.0 under FreeBSD.

      Well, defense is their business, isn't it?

      --
      605413? Yes, it's a prime.
  25. Wasteful military spending by Uninvited+Guest · · Score: 4, Funny

    25,000 tons?! I'm sure I could build an unsolicated bulk email server that weighs less than 1 ton.
    ---Okay, so it wouldn't be amphibious.

    --
    Sometimes I worry that I'll develop Alzheimer's disease, but no one will notice.
  26. Re:Amphi? by Phaid · · Score: 4, Informative

    LPD-17 class ships (Landing Platform, Dock) are not themselves amphibious, but transport amphibious craft such as LCACs (Landing Craft, Air Cushion) and other vehicles used in amphibious operations.

    For more information on these ships, see .

  27. I do not like it, Sam I Am... by GeoGreg · · Score: 5, Funny
    I do not like unsolicited Spam!

    I do not like it from a boat

    I do not like it from a goat

    I don't need a huge torpedo

    I don't need help with my libido

    I do not like it from Chinese

    I do not like it, stop it, please!

    I do not like unsolicited Spam,

    So please REMOVE ME Sam I Am!

    1. Re:I do not like it, Sam I Am... by herrvinny · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course you need a torpedo, silly. You need the torpedo to blow the spammers out of the water!

  28. Just a server with a ship name? by AchmedHabib · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't you think that thy just might use the names of ships etc for the names of their servers.

  29. Re:Amphibious Spam Relay? Nor really by Neurotoxic666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's actualy a new node for warboaters...

    --
    You are more than the sum of what you consume. Desire is not an occupation.
  30. Simple Spam Solution... by Dave21212 · · Score: 2, Funny


    Why not just buy a scooter from the guy - then they will stop emailing you.

    ;)

    Seriously though, it seems to be questionable if any military network was actually compromised...

    --
    "Whoever would overthrow the liberty of a nation must begin by subduing the freeness of speech."--Benjamin Franklin
  31. zerg by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Remember when that Kuro5hin poster was concerned about the safety of the Vice President, and he got a visit from the Feds because they thought he was making threats against the VPs life? If they've got the time (and money!) to deal with ridiculous shit like that, then surely they can take care of an issue like this, right?

    I mean, seriously, spam costs money, right? It doesn't cost the spammers anything, but the compromised relays must be losing out from cost of bandwidth and deterioration of service, right? w/ Halliburton fucking taxpayers recently, surely someone at the military must be keeping an eey out for other people trying to take advantage of us, right?!

    Does that make sense?

    --
    [o]_O
  32. this thing supports LCACs and Ospreys? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good to see the Navy centralizes control of their boondoggle projects.

  33. Saw it Coming, but no one listened by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I swear I tried to bring this up as a Sgt in the Marines back in early 90's. I was attached to the Marine Corps element that had decision making on what computer operating systems to use. The Officers in charge started going the way towards Microsoft. The Marines at that time had Banyan servers and had to worry over virus infections, but not on the servers.
    I told the Officers that if we get Microsoft servers, we will have nothing but cracking and virus infections on the servers. No one wanted to listen. Microsoft pretty much snowballed them and sold them a bill of goods that are leaving the military open to attacks.
    I can bet that someone loses their job over this one. I just hope it isn't a person who turns out to be a fall guy.

    1. Re:Saw it Coming, but no one listened by jotok · · Score: 2, Informative
      I wonder, I bet I could make buku dinero doing as a DoD IT/IS security consultant. Security is a economically inelastic product... entities will pay $$$$$$$$ for real security, not airport TSA-brand of security.
      DOD Cert
  34. Re:which military vessels aren't naval? by Avihson · · Score: 2, Informative

    All the Army Watercraft are not navy!
    The Army Transportation Corps (wo)man the tugboats. They handle the ship to shore transport of equipment and supplies.

    Not sure of the numbers now, but back in the 80s, the US Army has more watercraft than the Navy, more aircraft than the Airforce, and more grunts than the Marines.

    Check FAS.org for more info on the "Army's navy"
    Another good place for information on the Transportation corps is Ft Eustis

  35. Re:Had to take a second look by tupshin · · Score: 2, Informative

    No...quoting from their site:
    "The Navy Office of Information is headed by the Chief of Information (CHINFO), a Rear Admiral, who is the direct representative of the Secretary of the Navy and the Chief of Naval Operations for Navy-wide public affairs matters."

  36. spammers move offshore by Sabalon · · Score: 2, Funny

    See...just one day after Bush signs the dma spam law and the spammers have gone and moved their operations off-shore.

  37. DON'T LET THE ARMY OR AIRFORCE FIND OUT!!! by wizkid · · Score: 3, Funny


    They'll want bigger faster spam relays!! :)

    --
    I take no responsibility for what I say. Even though I'm never wrong :)
  38. Re:Amphibious Spam Relay? Nor really by ckaminski · · Score: 5, Funny

    Better be careful... this is one access point that can fight back...

  39. Re:Amphi? by craw · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually with a few exceptions, the bulk of the "blue water" US scientific ships (e.g., AGOR class) are owned by the US Navy and are on loan to various academic institutions. These ships are distinctly different than their military counterparts as their hulls are painted white instead of gray.

  40. Re:Military tortures Saddam by steeviant · · Score: 2, Funny

    It never fails to amaze me how many former navy seals, marines, snipers, covert operatives, counter-terrorist agents and military officers frequent internet forums which are otherwise used mostly by nerds.

  41. Re:Military tortures Saddam by Sacks · · Score: 2, Funny

    Unless some of us veterans did computers before in the military, which would lead me to say that nerd stuff is no longer nerdy. It finally has been found to be what it is - Intelligence. Disclaimer: This is meant in NO WAY to denote that the millitary is intelligent. Sometimes they have the best deals on frontal labotomies.

  42. You forget ... by 1000baseFX · · Score: 2, Informative
    The one important point of Spamming, many (majority) are spoofed, as in entire headers.
    We get 20k to 30k per day where I work, that's pieces of spam not bytes.

    Of that I successfully filter 75%, only because when I had it down to 99% success rate people bitched that they were not getting enough mail. Go figure!
    I have personally analyzed well over half a million spam messages over the last 8 months and have found less than 5% that were not spoofed.

  43. Re:Server suddenly gone by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Insightful
    If you have practical suggestions for making /. work better then write and submit an article about how you would go about doing that. I'm sure we'd all love to hear your suggestions.

    1) Spellcheck articles
    2) Check for dupes.

    Since both of these would be trivial to implement, and both have been suggested thousands of times, I conclude that actually suggestions are not welcome.

  44. Re:Military tortures Saddam by PHoliday · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Right... except that (s)he had to fight through basic training/boot camp/etc also. Being a nerd doesn't get you a free pass on the difficult training.

    They may not be risking their lives, but there are a ton of "fake soldiers" who will never be stationed in a war-zone but are absolutely imperative to ensure that "real soldiers" have the best odds of survival possible and the country has the best odds of victory.

    Implying that the enlisted men and women who don't serve in combat aren't "real soldiers" is a cheap and ignorant thing to do... maybe why you posted as AC, perhaps?