Slashdot Mirror


Windows XP, Games, and Administrator Privileges?

An anonymous reader asks: "I manage my kids' computer, running Windows XP Professional, with an iron fist. They have limited access rights as I do not want them accidentally deleting the wrong file or downloading trojan software. However, software products, particularly games, fight my user management schemes at every turn. Each user on the computer is member of the 'Gamers' group. This group has full access to the games directory, the place I install all of the game software. I did this since games often need to update configuration files or write save files. Despite these changes, I still run into problems. Our latest two games, Age of Mythology and Battlefield 1942, require administrator privileges irrespective of the file privileges. I have not been able to overcome the problem and it seems, based on Googling, that others are in the same boat. Fellow Slashdot readers, what have you done to overcome this problem?"

44 of 201 comments (clear)

  1. Teach them. by userloser · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In the long term teaching them what they should and shouldn't do will prove to be the best option to achieve this.

  2. short answer by nsebban · · Score: 5, Informative

    1- Dual Boot (WinXp for you + Win98SE for your kids)
    2- A ghost image of the win98SE partition
    3- Let them play
    4- Wait for them to say "Dad it doesn't work anymore !"
    5- Restore your ghost backup
    6- Goto 3

    Seems a bit dub, but it works better and it's less a pain than managing XP user rights.

    --
    ____
    nico
    Nico-Live
    1. Re:short answer by Decado · · Score: 4, Informative

      Or you could just use the system restore facility that you got free with Windows XP. Install your games, set a system restore point (start->programs->accessories->system tools->system restore) and give full admin access to the kids. Then when they mess anything up go back to your known good restore point. Thats a hell of a lot easier than dual booting and ghosting and you dont need any extra software to do it.

      --

      Slashdot: Proof that a million monkeys at a million typewriters can create a masterpiece

  3. Standards? We don't need standards... by Drakino · · Score: 4, Informative

    Unfortunatly a ton of programs do not adhere to the exact standards they should, and there really isn't a way around it. XP easially lets you grant someone full control, or none, but this dosen't mean every program is going to listen and act the same. The sad realty is to get anything done on a Windows box, you have to sit logged in as an admin. It's ironic that a Microsoft published game is one of the ones giving you pains...

    Though, to address your current problem, you could create a new user, use the policy manager to only allow one of the troublesome games to be run, and grant them admin rights. Then use the "Run As" feature of XP to run that program as this new user, from the kids login. Just keep an eye on where the game is saving files, as it could be doing so in the new users home folder somewhere.

  4. Buy an Xbox by Golthar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    At lot of games should also be available on an Xbox.
    Having one of those will save you the grief of having to maintain a system for gaming

  5. Same problem with my kids - different solution by Captain+Kirk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I've a 10 and 8 year old who play Warcraft and Age of Mythology. My fix it to let them do what they want and accept the consequences it the system broke. Sure enough it wouldn't boot after a few months.

    Rather than rush to fix it, I spent a week doing nothing but said I "was doing research into how to fix the problem." The 1 week without games was sufficiently traumatic that there's been no problem since.

    1. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by tankdilla · · Score: 2, Funny

      I actually just got into Warcraft about a month ago, and couldn't stop playing it until I beat it. A week without Warcraft could be seen as cruel and unusual punishment.

      --

      -Look lively. LOOK LIVELY!!! --Mr. Shmallow

    2. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by PainKilleR-CE · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Rather than rush to fix it, I spent a week doing nothing but said I "was doing research into how to fix the problem." The 1 week without games was sufficiently traumatic that there's been no problem since.

      This is actually what drove me to learn how to do an OS reinstall. As time went on, each time Windows ate itself, my dad would take longer and longer to get around to fixing it. Eventually, I got sick of waiting and did it myself. Within about two months I had him in complete understanding of the beauty of keeping data and OS on seperate drives, and now, many years later, my dad calls me when he wants information on how to do something or advice on new hardware.

      --
      -PainKilleR-[CE]
    3. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by Artifex · · Score: 2, Flamebait
      Rather than rush to fix it, I spent a week doing nothing but said I "was doing research into how to fix the problem." The 1 week without games was sufficiently traumatic that there's been no problem since.


      Were you researching, or just lying to your kids?
      If you're going to punish them, at least be up front and tell them so, and not passively, secretly penalize them.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
    4. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Insightful

      No kids ehh?

      It's all too obvious really.

      Here, I'll spell it out for you:

      He was giving his children an opportunity to learn the relationship between their actions and subsequent consequences, on their own.

      Again, the key word here is: LEARN

      --
      No Comment.
    5. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by 4of12 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Exactly right on.

      I agree with the earlier poster, too, who was motivated to learn how to re-build his computer after crashes because, well, no one else had time to do it.

      I think that's a great way for kids to learn something practical as well as the moral lessons of actions/consequences, if you want something done you have to do it yourself, etc..

      The double edged sword, of course, is that when your sharp kid learns the intricacies of re-installing the OS from scratch, getting the settings right, etc. that they'll be empowered to see the Internet in all its ugliness, too.

      So the corollary is that, before you throw the installation CD and manuals and have your kid rebuild the computer, explain plainly the basic fact that much of the world is screwed up in these 23 different ways and that you'll see it all on the Internet.

      Arbitrary ages of 18 ought to be replaced by "whatever age someone is able to figure out how to rebuild a computer" IMHO. Yes, there are some people who ought never to be exposed to some stuff no matter how old they are... The age of understanding concepts should be the threshhold for driving, voting, consuming harmful addictive substances, etc. rather than some X years.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    6. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by 0x0d0a · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yeah...I have to agree.

      It's quite possible to do the exact same punishment while still telling them the truth. In the short term, you might produce more friction, but knowing that they can trust what a parent tells them is priceless.

    7. Re:Same problem with my kids - different solution by bigman2003 · · Score: 2, Funny

      This is actually what drove me to learn how to do an OS reinstall.

      How many times did you have to hit 'Next'?

      --
      No reason to lie.
  6. secondary logon service by happylight · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use the secondary logon service. Right click on the game program short-cut, select properties, under the "Shortcut" tab click on advanced, then check the box that says "run with different credentials".

    It'll prompt you for the administrator password when you run it.

    1. Re:secondary logon service by Zardoz44 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Here's what he means:

      1. Kids want to play Warcraft, so they click shortcut.

      2. Shortcut has "run with different credentials" checked.

      3. Prompt asks for user information.

      4. Kids shout" "Daddy!".

      5. Dad comes over to computer, works his administrator magic.

      6. Game runs with administrator credentials, but the kids don't have it.

      The biggest problem is that there's bound to be a lot of shouting for "Daddy!" in that household if they really like the game.

    2. Re:secondary logon service by SurgeryByNumbers · · Score: 5, Informative

      Let me give you some more details on WinXP that will let you work around having your kids login as admin.

      1) Download (TweakUI) Powertools for WinXP from the Microsoft website.
      2) Create an admin login with the rights required to play the game, and use TweakUI to disable that account. No one will be able to actually login as that account.
      3) Set up the game to "run with different credentials," as outlinded above.

    3. Re:secondary logon service by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I think the idea is to have only that one program run with administrator privileges. I.E., the game is executed, it alone runs as administrator, and, when it's done, the system is returned to user-level status.

      Windows XP does have the means to do this, although it's not particularly well documented. It's essentially the functional equivalent of running a "su -c progname" on a *nix-based system....

      --
      Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  7. Regmon + Filemon by EddWo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Use Regmon and Filemon from sysinternals.com to discover which files/keys the program is trying to modify and is failing on. Then adjust the ACLs on those files/keys so that the Gamers group has write access.

    One of the conditions for obtaining the "Designed for Windows XP" Logo is that the program must be capable of being run under a Limited user account. If MS's own software isn't capable of this then you ought to report it to them as a bug.

    The situation with XP home which only has "Limited" and "Administrator" account types really does not help people adopt more secure working practices.

    The situation ought to improve in future but at the moment it does not seem to be something that most developers test against.

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
    1. Re:Regmon + Filemon by Xiadix · · Score: 2, Informative

      There is a good write up about how one person deals with this here:
      How to run as non admin

      There was also a discussion about this on Broadband Reports
      Runing as admin

  8. VMWare by sigxcpu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Try using VMWare.
    you can isolate the game in its virtual copy of windows and grant it only limited acces to the real Network/Drives/System.

    --
    As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    1. Re:VMWare by Gyler+St.+James · · Score: 4, Informative

      Have you even TRIED to play a game like BF1942 in a frickin VM window? I have. It's not viable. Let them play DOOM, sure. Quake is fantastic in a VM. Max Payne 2 tries to run...keyword: tries. Never does. Love playing games at 1fps.

      --

    2. Re:VMWare by jmlyle · · Score: 2, Informative

      VMware does not have good graphics virtualization yet. They are looking at it.

      From a VMware Technical Support guy:

      There is no hardware acceleration available with the VMware virtual video card. Hardware provided 3-d acceleration won't work at all, last I checked.

      Windows Direct X provides software emulation where hardware acceleration is not available; unfortunately this is *very slow* and some/most 3d games don't even run with software emulated acceleration being the only 3d available.

      This is a feature request (look in the feature requests forum), but we don't have a 3-d video card virtualized yet, so I can't tell you for sure whether or not this will happen in the future.

      If we end up providing a full 3-d capable virtualized video card, I'll make sure to update on the feature requests forum when that happens.

      --
      I have misplaced my pants.
    3. Re:VMWare by Edgewize · · Score: 2, Informative

      VMware does not pass emulate your video card's features, it just uses a simple framebuffer. Since the virtual OS only sees a SVGA adapter, it cannot access your hardware 3D acceleration. So it is forced to emulate all the texturing, bump mapping, lighting, etc. through software. Obviously this leads to unacceptable game performance.

  9. Patches by NexusTw1n · · Score: 5, Informative

    Microsoft appear to have a patch for this problem, I don't know if that will fix it for you.

    Other ideas include giving "Gamers" full access to the "Program Files" directory in case it's trying to write there rather than your games directory.

    If that doesn't work then perhaps mail the CD back and ask for a refund. There is no reason any application, least of all a game should require admin rights for normal operation, and if it does, the software is not fit for the purpose it was sold for.

    --
    It has become appallingly obvious that our technology has exceeded our humanity. --Albert Einstein
  10. My Advice: Don't even bother. by Domini · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got the same setup for family of mine where they only use internet browsing and mail as multiple users. (They don't even use fast user switching.) And even though they all use restricted accounts, they still seem to be able to corrupt system registry hive files.

    My advice is not to even waste your time with this. I'm sure your time is worth so much that you could have afforded another PC, or at the very least Hard drive imaging and restore software.

    It's best to let kids loose on a machine, and if they mess it up, you just restore it... it's their (save game) loss.
    They will learn about all those vital microsoft tricks like backing up your important data and do not install all that junk.

    It's also imporant then to get them each a machine, but since you will not be wasting time admining those machines anymore, I'm sure you will have a lot more time and thus money.

    I mean, really, since Win NT 4.0 the graphics drivers have had admin rights... and you are still denying this to your kids! ;)

    I think the best admin policy is education of the user. Also keep a system restore handy with software such as Norton Ghost (with all the propper patches already installed to protect against internet worms etc.) as well as good anti-virus software. Believe me, this is the cheaper solution..

  11. 'kids computer' by xmple · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If it is truly the kids computer (so you have another one with all your important data on it), then I should let them have full privileges, and let them explore the computer on their own.
    How else will they know what a computer can 'really' do, if you just let them have restricted access to a single game directory.

    Let them explore, let them familiarize with the computer, they learn from their mistakes: if you do something wrong, like deleting system files, you probably wont try that again.

    When my parent bought me (well it was ment to be for the whole family) a 286 computer with dos installed, I knew nothing, and neither did my parents.
    so I explored, and I found a 'help' command, and a 'dir' command, and I found different types of files (the ones you can execute, and others)...

    So once again:
    It's not that bad when something goes wrong, format the disk, and reinstall.

    However I would recommend on restrincting access to the internet, so they can't accidently download malware.

    --
    Time is the only precious thing I've got left; Don't waste it
  12. Check your ACLs by stevenbdjr · · Score: 4, Informative

    These kinds of problems are most certainly related to file and/or registry permissions. Working at a K-12, I'm often troubleshooting software that won't run as a normal user. I've found the majority of the problems are related to poorly written software trying to add and modify files to the SYSTEMROOT directory (usually c:\windows or c:\winnt). The rest are usually solved by opening up permissions on the applications registry keys under HKLM.

    Get yourself a copy of RegMon and FileMon from Sysinternals. You'll need to logon as an Administrator, start up reg or filemon, then do a RunAs on the application to run it as a normal user. You'll probably want to filter the output of reg/filemon to only show activity of the app itself, otherwise you'll be looking at all activity on the system. Look for ACCESS DENIED errors in places where normal users can't usually write. Slowly open up those areas to modify access until you've found a solution.

    1. Re:Check your ACLs by curious.corn · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Good answer but it makes me wonder... how is this weeding trough the registry simpler than unix administration? It's no wonder Microsoft calls it the Registry Hive... it's a Hornet Nest not much different than /etc
      Sorry for the flamebait, it's just something that crossed my mind reading your comment.

      --
      Mi domando chi à il mandante di tutte le cazzate che faccio - Altan
  13. Re:Encourage your children in life, not games. by Babbster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm always amazed that in these modern times, with so many bicycles, motorcycles and cars, people still manage to care for and ride such high horses.

  14. Power Users by tiny69 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Add them to the "Power Users" group. From Computer Management:
    Power Users possess most administrative powers with some restrictions. Thus, Power Users can run legacy applications in addition to certified applications
    A large number of programs want to be able to write and modify files located in system directories as well as make changes in the registry. Normal Users are not allowed to do this.

    "Start --> Help --> Search --> Power Users" to get a list of the things Power Users are able to do and what they are restricted from doing.

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
    1. Re:Power Users by Simon · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Add them to the "Power Users" group. From Computer Management:

      ummm... The Power Users group also has too much power to screw the machine up.

      Go not unto /. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)

      Or in this case just plain miss the point. We are trying to stop the computer from getting trashed here.

      --
      Simon

  15. Re:Hrm. by KDan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    More to the point, stop struggling and realise that windows is by design a system which will fall over itself after a long enough period of time, and you WILL have to reinstall it sometime. So stop trying to delay that moment, and make sure that you can do that easily. The previous suggestion about ghosting the system in a stable state is good, but not the best because you will still have to keep track of what important updates you hadn't done when you made the ghost image.

    Probably the best solution would be to keep a CD-RW regularly updated with the entire list of drivers/service packs/updates that you need to install when you reinstall the computer, along with a list of the programs that must be reinstalled before any games (eg Office, any dev tools that you need, etc), and (this will be a shocker) teach your kids to do it!!! Then when the computer falls over, you can tell the kids that it's in part their fault, and that this is a good learning opportunity for them (and it is - you learn more about how a computer functions when rebuilding it from scratch than when using it), and so stick them on there for whatever time it takes and let them do it (under penalty of no gaming if they screw it up and you have to do it yourself, of course).

    The result will be kids who know more about PCs than just gaming, who will not need to pester their friends/parents to get their computer(s) set up, and who will be more computer-literate than most of their age group. And don't worry about the task being 'too complicated'. Don't underestimate your kids, they will pick it up in no time, and by the time the next version of Windows comes along they'll probably be the ones giving you tips on how to install your PC.

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
  16. Are you a BOFH? by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 2, Funny

    Are you a BOFH or not ? Just because they're your kids, they shouldn't go away without a good LART .

    --

    -
    Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
  17. No Full Access by Shihar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I understand the sentiment that people think you should just teach them to not do stupid things and give them full access. While that is nice in theory, it is hard to teach children, especially younger children the important lessons without burning through a few computers. Unfortunately, the brighter they are, the more likely they are to break something. On occasion I head home and every time I do I have to fix two machines FILLED with Trojan programs and spyware. I educate, but there is only so much I can do. Kids are stupid and can be tricked, pure and simple. If you have a shared computer that does serious work, then it means constantly fighting the crap that gets on just to keep important things running. If someone could answer this question, I would appreciate so I don't have to constantly be battling to keep these computers working.

    The best solution of course is to get them their own computer to use and destroy. This is fine if your kid just wants to beat around the Internet as you can buy a cheap POS computer for pocket change these days. However, if you have a young aspiring gamer it becomes much more difficult, as a gamer needs something with power behind it. Dropping a couple thousand dollars just for a kid to have his own computer no one else uses is a rather expensive proposition.

    What I would REALLY like answered is if there is a way on an XP machine to keep Trojans and spyware programs out. Yes, I know adaware and spybot can clean this stuff, but I have found that most of the time it is far too late and the damage is done. Does anyone have any good suggestions for keepings this crap off in the first place?

  18. XP and the Compatibility Engine. by tvadakia · · Score: 4, Informative

    One other thing you might consider is the fact that Windows XP initiates the Compatibility Engine on a lot of games. One game I can think of right off the bat that does is The Sims. A user needs to be either in the Power Users or the Administrators group in order to run a game or any other application with this engine included in use.

    There are a few things you might consider doing. First would to be to google to figure out how one might add the "lesser" users to be able to use the compatibility engine, or at least to run those particular applications (games) with elevated privledges. Another is to write a simple script to use the "runas" command to automatically run a program as administrator using a cached password (in the registry) to run the game in question and then creating a shortcut to that script on the desktop (or wherever) to run the game.

    One other thing you can do is add your kids to the power users group then use the Local Security Settings mmc and right-click on "Software Restriction Policies" and chose "Create New Policies." You then can start creating rules of what directories are accessable on the computer (make sure in the "Enforcement" policy to choose "All users except local administrators", you don't want to lock yourself out). You can refine which folders they are granted or denied access to by right-clicking on the "Additional Rules" folder and choosing a new "hash" rule to specify a particular application itself, or a new "path rule" to specify an application path (which'll include EVERYTHING in all subfolders within that path.)

    These are just a few ideas to get you started down the path.

    --
    Unique.
  19. The real reason admin access is required... by DiSKiLLeR · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I have found this to be the case, too. I didn't want my gf's son (an 8 year old) having admin access on my XP machine, but half the damn games required admin access.

    This required rightclicking on the game's shortcut, selecting 'run as' and calling me over to type in my admin password... several times a day! )(#@()$*@#()$&@#$@#

    Its not that programs want to write to the registry, or system files, or anything else.

    It simply seems to be the cd copy protection... most games have various types of cd copy protection (i dunno, daemon tools can emulate most of them when it mounts iso's, but anyway). It seems the games require admin access to perform their little sneaky copy protection checks on the CD...

    Personally i think this is a real pain in the damn ass (why do we need the CD in there anyway! The game is already installed FFS) and now we require to give all kids admin access on XP machines just to play games! Its a damn nightmare.

    No wonder we hate software manufactureres for all their sneaky copy protection, serial keys, product activation, and now needing admin access to run anything.... *sighs*

    I'm glad i bought my titanium powerbook. And last week i bought a used G4 cube. Forget windows....

    D.

    --
    You can tell how powerful someone is by the magnitude of the crime they can commit and be able to get away with.
  20. Re:educate / console / play outside by karnal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why is this insightful?

    The man wanted to know how to solve a problem. Granted, you give him a few good "alternatives", but that doesn't solve the problem.

    It'd be like me saying "My car is old and doesn't run well -- what do I do to ensure it won't leave me stranded?" and you telling me "Ride a bike. It doesn't pollute and it's always ready to roll...."

    --
    Karnal
  21. Re:OT:Where do I find def'ns for Win's process nam by EddWo · · Score: 4, Informative

    A list of system processes, what they are for etc.
    http://www.liutilities.com/products/wintasks pro/pr ocesslibrary/

    A lot of system services share process space with each other. You will have 3 or more svchost processes. To find out which services are safe to disable.

    http://www.blackviper.com/WinXP/servicecfg.htm

    --
    "Taligent is still pure vapor. Maybe they'll be the last who jumps up on Openstep... "
  22. Re:educate / console / play outside by GeckoX · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Pretty much exactly what I wanted to say.
    I in no way got the impression that the submitter of the question tries to use his machine as a substitute for parenting. Or is it now bad to ever let children play games, even for a second?

    I got the impression that for once a parent was trying to do the right thing in regards to their computer and their children.

    --
    No Comment.
  23. Run as different user/Crack the games? by rufo · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, they don't. It says right on that page to "try logging in as an Administrator" before it says to install the fix.

    The reason the games need this is because of the CD copy protection; they need to access the drive directly to be able to see whether the bad sectors/whatever hidden data they're looking for are there. You could try cracking the games and seeing if that helps, as I'm pretty sure that's the only they need Admin access - a good site for cracks is GameCopyWorld. I often use them because I'm a lazy bastard who doesn't want to risk ruining his (original!) CDs by switching them around all the time, and I've never had a problem with any of the cracks I've downloaded from there.

    One other possible method.. Isn't there a way to have Windows "run as" a different user (ala +s on UNIX)? So you could have it run as some special Admin-priveleged user, while keeping them in the non-Admin account most of the time.

    --
    My English teacher once told me that two positives don't make a negative. Two words for her: Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Run as different user/Crack the games? by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2, Informative
      Isn't there a way to have Windows "run as" a different user (ala +s on UNIX)?

      No, Windows doesn't have setuid executables, but if it did that would be a quick fix to his problem. The "run as different user" feature prompts the user for the target account's password before running. The proper solution would be to give the account access to read those non-filesystem sectors on the CD, but I have no idea what API games use to implement this.

      It also may be difficult to reimplement the "run as" feature so it does not ask for a password. Windows does not have any equivalent to a "setuid" system call: to change a program's credentials, one must provide a password. You can see this when you try to run a service under a different account: it will prompt you for the target account's password if you don't have the service run under SYSTEM (svchost runs under SYSTEM (the real equivalent to root, more privileged than administrators), so services don't need a password to run under that account). This password is then saved somewhere (not sure where or how, but the calls require plaintext passwords so it must be recoverable). When Windows apologists claim that the Windows security architecture is well-designed but it only has been tainted by backwards-compatibility, this is one of the examples I use to refute their claims.

      It may be possible to build an executable that has an administrator password built into it. The idea is that you have a service (running as SYSTEM) and then a small program that communicates with the service and asks it to launch an executable. The service has the password built into it (or stored somewhere), so the user is never prompted for a password. Or equivalently, the service runs under the target account and you let Windows save the password for you (presumably, Windows will somehow obscure the password). Obviously, this makes the password available in cleartext to available to anyone who can boot off a Linux floppy and bypass filesystem controls, but I'm guessing you're not worried about your kids doing this.

      Writing such a service is very non-trivial. The security APIs it uses are very poorly documented and you have to go through all kinds of loops to allow a service to interact with the user's desktop (necessary for the spawned game process). This stuff is so horrid that I don't touch it without getting paid, but I'm available for consulting work if it's that important to anyone :)

  24. Re:educate / console / play outside by erroneous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, sometimes "replace the car" is the right and answer and "fix the car with gaffer tape" is the wrong answer.

    PCs are not devices designed or built to be used by children. They are complicated and easily broken. Either educate the children to use the PC properly or find an alternative entertainment for them.

    --
    erroneous: look me up in a dictionary
  25. Re:Dont Let Them build a computer by KDan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    B: So don't let them mess with the inside of the computer until they have enough pocket money stashed up to pay for it themselves (or out of their future pocket money)... Simple enough. Duh.

    As for A, similarly: "Sure, you can have it. I'll pay for half of it. You pay for the other half." Blang, two lessons in one - IT literacy AND value of money.

    Daniel

    --
    Carpe Diem
  26. OT, but... by sbma44 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the data on a different drive thing makes sense for mp3s, movies, documents... but not for much else, at least under windows. The registry makes sure of that.

    I only mention this because I've had a lot of problems at work as a result of our server setup guy subscribing to this philosophy. Sure, a 6GB windows partition and a 40 GB data partition for programs sounds nice, but when C fills up you're hosed.