Slashdot Mirror


Linus Blasts SCO's Header Claims

jonbryce writes "Linus has responded to the latest claims made by SCO in their letter to the Fortune 1000 companies. Basically, he wrote the code himself, and it has been there since Linux 0.0.1. No copying from BSD or any other source." You can also read his comment to the Linux kernel mailing list, which reads in part "I think we can totally _demolish_ the SCO claim that these 65 files were somehow 'copied.' They clearly are not."

57 of 599 comments (clear)

  1. Look what we have here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    A reputable publicly-traded tax-paying United States corporation and some Finnish teenager from goddamn Communist country. Hmm, I wonder who's telling the truth.

  2. Trifecta by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow, it's a bloody SCO story trifecta day today! :)

    1. Re:Trifecta by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Funny

      Its a special Christmas present just for Slashdot :)

      --
      Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    2. Re:Trifecta by webtre · · Score: 3, Funny

      this is the best RamaHannaKwaanzMas ever!

      --
      litigious bastards
      suck it sco!
    3. Re:Trifecta by sjvn · · Score: 4, Funny

      >unfortunately jounalists don't read slashdot or Groklaw

      Dank! I guess I'll have to stop reading Slashdot and GrokLaw now. ;-)

      Steven

  3. WANTED: Linux supporter since the start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Basically, he wrote the code himself, and it has been there since Linux 0.0.1."

    Do any of you Slashot people here have a copy of Linux 0.0.1 to prove it? :)

    1. Re:WANTED: Linux supporter since the start by FyRE666 · · Score: 4, Funny

      You know, you'd think SCO would want to keep this quiet. You know, the fact they consider linux 0.0.1 "code" technically advanced, equal to their current products (presuming they still market any?) and ready for large scale deployment. And that was over 10 years ago!!

    2. Re:WANTED: Linux supporter since the start by anthonyrcalgary · · Score: 3, Funny

      hehehe this is fun

      from linux-0.01/kernel/sched.c:
      * 'schedule()' is the scheduler function. This is GOOD CODE! There
      * probably won't be any reason to change this, as it should work well
      * in all circumstances (ie gives IO-bound processes good response etc).
      * The one thing you might take a look at is the signal-handler code here.

      --
      When someone might yell at me, it has to be OpenBSD.
    3. Re:WANTED: Linux supporter since the start by ignavus · · Score: 2, Funny

      comments added, new error numbers, but the file itself doesn't look any diffferent

      Wow, they must have used invisible ink!

      --
      I am anarch of all I survey.
  4. End it already... by euxneks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Isn't there some way to just shrug off SCO? I mean, it's like some annoying little man that constantly claims your head as his and is suing you for taking your head from him...

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:End it already... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      There you are! Thought you got away did you? Gimme my head you bastard. And how dare you call me little, I'd be taller if I had my head back.

  5. Re:A humble programmer! by geekBass · · Score: 5, Funny

    SCO Press release tomorrow: Linus is ashamed of the copyrighted code. We knew this all along.

  6. Re:Um, Who The FUCK is Linus? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    He's the main thief of SCO property. /sarcasm :)

  7. Re:What about patches a bugfixes? by j_w_d · · Score: 4, Funny

    Mod the parent "funny."

    --
    ------ The only greater hazard to your liberty than n politicians is n+1 politicians.
  8. Actually it was I, ellem, who wrote that code by ellem · · Score: 2, Funny

    I can't remeber now what those 65 thingies are but I remember writing them. I did it with charcoal, a small floating rock and a duck I always keep in my pocket. I kept an onion tied around my waist, which was the style of the times, and I dreamt of marrying my comely cousin. Alas I lived in Springfield not Shelbyville. Anyway... I was writing code that I never saw before in BSD Free, Open or otherwise.

    There was a boy with a blanket being pulled by a beagle. He was quoting Chaucer and blathering about a pumpkin, possibly Great. In any event he took from me my charcoaled rock and yelled, "You're a good man ellem!"

    I hadn't thought much about him until slightly after I invented a small programming language called Sea which two nice gentlemen asked to look at, I showed it to them and another man took my hand-held rolly-ma-jig I called a rat. Anyway...

    --
    This .sig is fake but accurate.
  9. Self-deprecation by Linus by idiotnot · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I wrote them (and looking at the original ones, I'm a bit ashamed: the "toupper()" and "tolower()" macros are so horribly ugly that I wouldn't admit to writing them if it wasn't because somebody else claimed to have done so ;)"

    If SCO is big on claiming ugly code, I can only imagine what a convoluted mess UnixWarez actually is. :-)

  10. Re:Um, Who The FUCK is Linus? by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can't believe anyone on Slashdot doesn't know who Linus is.

    He's Lucy's baby brother, dumbass! You know, the one with the blanket?

    Where have you *been* the last 50 years?

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  11. Tannenbaum was right! by jaymzter · · Score: 5, Funny

    After reading Linus' code review of a younger Linus's work, it seems Tannenbaum was right.

    Tannenbaum: Linus, you fail it! 'F' for you!

    --
    If thou see a fair woman pay court to her, for thus thou wilt obtain love
  12. *This* is copied... by caferace · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can see the SCO press release now: "Linus Torvalds admits he is 'a bit ashamed' regarding our copyrighted code".

  13. Too bad... by mekkab · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm sorry this whole SCO thing is starting to come to its inevitable, and glorious end.

    Yes, I wrote that right, I'm sorry.

    Its been a heck of a lot of fun bashing SCO. Now that Linus himself is back-hand slapping the shit out of them in a most satisfyingly public style, I can only think- what about next month, next year? By then folks, we'll have no SCO. It'll only be Microsoft and IBM/SUN (on alternating Thursdays) to bash around.

    SCO-y, we hardly knew ye

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  14. Hello, this is Linus Torvalds... by Maul · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...and I pronounce SCO as "Bullshit."

    --

    "You spoony bard!" -Tellah

  15. IBM presents the new letter in court by Linux_ho · · Score: 5, Funny

    IBM Attorney: "We would like to present as exhibit 128 the letter SCO recently sent to the Fortune 1000. Note how they threaten huge financial liability while claiming ownership of the most basic, internationally standardized, publically available C header files, some practically identical form of which has been present in every modern operating system and software development platform for over a decade, and several of which are freely published in first-year programming textbooks."

    Mr. Boies: "I object!"

    Judge: "And why is that, Mr. Boies?"

    Mr. Boies: "Because it's devastating to my case, your honor!"

    --
    include $sig;
    1;
    1. Re:IBM presents the new letter in court by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 4, Funny

      Mr. Boies: "Because it's devastating to my case, your honor!"

      Judge: "Objection overruled."

      Mr. Boies: "Good call!"

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
  16. Re:A humble programmer! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linus is setting SCO up for something similar

    Yeah, Linus foresaw this whole fiasco 12 years ago and deliberately wrote crappy, thread-unsafe, fragile macros just so he could point back to them now.

  17. Re:A humble programmer! by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Funny

    Linus is setting SCO up for something similar

    The bomb?

  18. It seems to me... by TimTurnip · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...that Linus just crafted a well-organized, thorough, LOGICAL explanation.

    Someone tell me what good we expect that to do with SCO? Isn't that a little bit like selling make-up to an orc?

    --

    Chicks dig my good /. karma.

  19. Re:A humble programmer! by pclminion · · Score: 5, Funny
    ctype.h is part of glibc, dumbass.

    Ahh... That must explain why it is found under /usr/src/linux/include/linux/ctype.h

    Wait for it....

    DUMBASS.

  20. Re:What about patches and bugfixes? by andreMA · · Score: 4, Funny

    If we are going to stand up in front of the world with a holier-than-thou attitude...The standards are somewhat lower for having a holier-than-SCO attitude.

  21. Re:Do you have to use 'cp' to violate copyright? by orthogonal · · Score: 4, Funny

    CO can't exactly claim the codes were under some form of encryption...

    <Darl McBride>Not encrypted? Then why are they called codes? Any manager can see that. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, if Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must buy up my stock.</Darl McBride>

  22. Re:And for those SEC filings... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wonder if the other ones quit?

    Well, the new job listing in your link, for the "Director of Financial Reporting" position (posted 12/08/03), does seem to be missing one important detail under "Job Responsibilities".

    I don't see "Serving as scapegoat during inevitable corporate collapse." Do you think that's what they mean by "Additional special projects will be given on an 'as occurring' basis?"

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  23. everyone relax... by bbdd · · Score: 5, Funny

    we should all take a deep breath, sit back, and have a sco juice

  24. Re:What about patches and bugfixes? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    If sco's best case is that upper and lower limits have been defined the same, they've got a pretty weak case.

    Not really. Do the math: On 32-bit machines, there are more than 4 billion possibilities for both upper and lower limits. That means that the odds of picking the same limits that SCO's innovators did are less than 1 in 10^19. Clearly, $3 Billion in damages wouldn't begin to make up for this kind of blatant copying; it's less than 1 billionth of one dollar for each non-infringing alternative set of limits.

  25. Play by Play by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny

    I feel like I'm watching some sort of play by play here. As Linus enumerates the various header files, I'm poppin' 'em into vim or emacs (or pico.. whatever mood strikes) and walking through them.

    Shit... a few more weeks of these ridiculous SCO claims and maybe I'll know enough about the kernel to become a Linux hacker. Laugh if you will, but I didn't know anymore about C than the data types and basic syntax before this crap started. I've learned all sorts of neat stuff since then!

    Thanks SCO! You've taught me in 9 months what I wouldn't let 4 years of college education beat into my thick skull!

    --
    Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  26. Re:Minor Mistake by Gumshoe · · Score: 3, Funny
    When being pedantic, double-check yourself more carefully.


    Point taken. I to think I went to all that trouble hauling out the ISO document to quote the relevent parts but ignored the obvious point that isdigit() is a macro :-\
  27. Re:And for those SEC filings... by AKAImBatman · · Score: 1, Funny

    Gotta love this:

    Proficient in Java technologies or Microsoft.Net
    7+ years in Web technologies

    Lemme see. Java servlets were introduced in 1998. That was a mere 5 years ago. .Net was introduced only about a year and a half ago. What "Web Technologies" do they want? CGI scripting!? Out of a Java programmer?!

  28. Darl McPuke by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 4, Funny
    In other news, SCO sues Coca Cola for infringing SCO's copyrights and patents by copying SCO's formula for the soft drink. SCO invented the formula in 1906. According to SCO CEO Darl McBride, Coca Cola contains over 1 million ingredients invented by SCO.

    In more other news, SCO sues the Catholic Church for infringing SCO's copyrights and patents through unlawful reproduction and distribution of the Holy Bible. According to SCO CEO Darl McBride, the Bible contains over 1 million verses copied illegally from SCO intellectual property.

    In yet more other news... oh I give up.

  29. Use of the work "the" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Linus used the word "the" in his analysis. I believe that word was stolen from the SCO letter to the 1000 customers, and clearly was not an original work on Linus' part. I hope he doesn't have to answer challenges from the lawyers on this one. Oh wait, I used "the".... damn...

  30. Maybe SCO is really trying to boost linux. by mAineAc · · Score: 4, Funny

    Through all this madness everyone thinks that SCO is against Linux. In reality this is the boost that Linux needed to get it's name out there to really start to get big. Maybe Darl gave up on his UNIX and decided to give Linux a hand up.....

    Well, I can dream can't I?

  31. Re:SCO's Angle by Concerned+Onlooker · · Score: 4, Funny
    I suppose you're right. But really, Darl isn't half the guitarist the Keith Richards is....

    --
    http://www.rootstrikers.org/
  32. Re:SCO's Angle by Eccles · · Score: 5, Funny

    But really, Darl isn't half the guitarist the Keith Richards is...

    On the other hand, from reading his press releases, I think he might be taking even more drugs than the Keith.

    --
    Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  33. This does not make sense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, Linus wrote most of it. But they included errno.h was because of

    #define ENOSENSE 169 /* This does not make sense */

    which was, of course, written by Chewbacca. They didn't want to give away their defense strategy, so they threw in the FUD in hopes people would not notice they are using the Chewbacca Strategy.

  34. Don't sweat it. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Funny

    [...] what about next month, next year? By then folks, we'll have no SCO. It'll only be Microsoft and IBM/SUN (on alternating Thursdays) to bash around.

    Don't sweat it. Somebody else will screw up badly enough to give us a third target. B-)

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  35. Re:Somebody 'splain this to me by flacco · · Score: 4, Funny
    And maybe I'll pull the next version of Windows out of my ass.

    actually, that would explain a lot.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  36. Re:And for those SEC filings... by Scrameustache · · Score: 4, Funny

    Proficient in Java technologies or Microsoft.Net
    7+ years in Web technologies

    Lemme see. Java servlets were introduced in 1998. That was a mere 5 years ago.


    Back in '97 a programmer friend of mine looking for work showed me a job ad asking for people with at least 5 years experience with Windows 95.

    Its a conspiracy I tell you, they're trying to catch careless time travellers...

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  37. Re:Since Linus wrote the headers himself... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    /. doesn't need its own dedicated personals
    section on the day pigs and cows can fly, SCO
    has let out something which holds basic BS test
    and your regular geek can bed a Victoria's secret
    model.

  38. Re:A humble programmer! by 0x12d3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    We get signal.h

    main(){
    screen_turn(on)

    ...horrible!! You're just lucky I couldn't work a
    "make --ur time.c" in
    :)~

  39. Re:What about patches and bugfixes? by EvanED · · Score: 2, Funny

    You're assuming the parent is serious, which the're most likely not. ;-)

  40. SCO (Stupid Computer Operators) by superpulpsicle · · Score: 2, Funny

    I was 5 inches away from trying united linux. When I saw SCO group as part of the distribution, I shut the web browser, the monitor, the computer... and threw it out the window.

    Thanks to SCO, I should sue them for leading me on such a rage.

  41. SCO claims Linus is incorrect! by TrentC · · Score: 4, Funny
    I can't believe what I just read on Groklaw; Darl McBride claims to have a "linux expert" that can assert that Linus did not, in fact, write those header files!
    But Mr. Torvalds is also clearly angered by SCO's accusation that much of Linux was merely copied. "In short," Mr. Torvalds said, "for the files where I personally checked the history, I can definitely say that those files were trivially written by me personally, with no copying from any Unix code, ever.

    "I can show, and SCO should have been able to see, that the list they show clearly shows original work, not copied."

    [Emphasis mine] Darl C. McBride, the chief executive of SCO, said he stood by the company's assertions. He said that a Linux expert who will testify in the SCO suit against I.B.M., which was filed last March, went over the code closely. "As a social revolutionary, Linus Torvalds is a genius," Mr. McBride said. "But at the speed the Linux project has gone forward something gets lost along the way in terms of care with intellectual property."


    So Darl McBride claims to have a Linux expert that can rebut the assertion that Linus has hard evidence that the disputed files were written by him in the form of those actual files, archived in a Linux tarball that is mirrored the world over.

    Well, all I can say is, if SCO can do that, then they deserve to win this case; we can all celebrate their victory by building snowforts in Hell.

    Jay (=
  42. Re:A humble programmer! by LouisvilleDebugger · · Score: 5, Funny

    >deliberately wrote crappy, thread-unsafe, fragile
    >macros just so he could point back to them now.

    So *that's* why you're supposed to do that....

  43. Linus The Liar by InvaderXimian · · Score: 1, Funny

    Come on Linus, admit it, there is SCO code in your programs, I've checked and confirmed everything.

    "iostream.h" is in there, along with "string.h" and "iomanip.h." These are just a few of the headers that can easily be found many SCO programs.

    Save the Open Source community now by admitting to this before Microsoft comes after us for using their patented 1's and 0's in binary. What then Linus, WHAT THEN!?

  44. Not ridiculous! by douglips · · Score: 3, Funny

    What idiot would buy 100 shares of SCOX for 4 cents? I've got better things to do with my money.

  45. Re:wanted Director SEC compliance by msoftsucks · · Score: 5, Funny

    Nah.. He didn't quit. He was fired because he wouldn't lie..

    --
    Quit playing Monopoly with Bill.
    Linux - of the people, by the people, and for the people.
  46. Re:A humble programmer! by goranb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Man, he's even better than we all thought... ;)

  47. Re:Think back to Edison and Swan ..... by arivanov · · Score: 2, Funny

    Collaborative effort... Hmm... Grep for F**K and B**GER especially in the sparc tree. In btw, it will be intresting if SCO claims infringment in these files on the basis of similar comments. It will be the biggest possible ROFL of the year.

    --
    Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
    http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  48. Re:Walk the walk, talk the talk by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Actually, I think the SCO strategy is just lying about everything and hoping everyone is too stupid to realize it.

    I think we should follow their lead.

    "NO. We have retaken the Unix source code. There are NO SCO execs there. I will take you there and show you. IN ONE HOUR!"

    "We defeated them yesterday. God willing, I will provide you with more information. I swear by God, I swear by God, those who are staying in Utah and the SCO headquarters have thrown these mercenaries in a crematorium."

    "We are not afraid of SCO. Allah has condemned them. They are stupid. They are stupid" (dramatic pause) "and they are condemned."

    "We have destroyed 50 Unix machines today. That 5-ohhh tanks" [while holding up his fingers]

    "I am not talking about the Utah people, I am talking about those mercenaries. ... They have started throwing those pencils, but they are not pencils, they are booby traps to kill the children."

    "I would like to clarify a simple fact here: How can you lay siege to a whole Operating System source code? Who is really under siege now? vmsystem.h cannot be besieged. ctype.h cannot be besieged. kernel.h cannot be besieged."

    There. I feel our public support growing already.

    --
    It's been a long time.
  49. Re:What about patches and bugfixes? by MuParadigm · · Score: 2, Funny


    But they do such a good job of it themselves.