Slashdot Mirror


Pluto: Linux-based Do-everything System

tazzzzz writes "Ever wanted an easy-to-configure, whole-house, internet-accessible, Linux-based VOIP PBX with video, PVR, firewall/router, security system, MP3 player, file server, personal web server, home automation (lights, thermostat) controller? I just came across the Pluto which claims to do all of this (and more, of course!). It'll set you back $15,000 if you're living in a small bachelor pad, but you didn't need that car anyway, did you?"

63 of 240 comments (clear)

  1. Security issues? by sparrow_hawk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hmm... as "nifty" as this might seem, I think I'd rather my firewall be separate from my mail/mp3/whatever server.

    1. Re:Security issues? by toasted_calamari · · Score: 5, Insightful

      My thoughts exactly. When I read this article the phrase "Jack of all trades, master of none" sprung to mind. I have never seen a "does everything" device that actually worked well.

    2. Re:Security issues? by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      No kidding. Get r00ted and there goes your TiVo, your mp3 collection, your heat, your security system! There goes your whole freaking house! No thank you.

      --
      Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    3. Re:Security issues? by Alpha27 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I do have to agree with this, some things should be seperate.

      My concerns would be :
      * load on the machine if it's used for everything at once, or at least two or more CPU/Memory intensive apps at once.
      * the quality of the services, would they run slower because it's running multiple services at once,
      * single point of failure

      I hope the $15,000 can compensate for all that.

    4. Re:Security issues? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      * load on the machine if it's used for everything at once, or at least two or more CPU/Memory intensive apps at once.

      Other than the VoIP w/video, nothing in that list seems to processor intensive to me.

    5. Re:Security issues? by 3Suns · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Who says it's just one machine? I don't know the system details, but it's quite possible that the system includes multiple actual computers that would have a firewall in front of everything, and eliminate the single point of failure. $15000 buys a lot of hardware, even if the system includes several "orbiters" and a fancy cell phone and whatever else.

      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    6. Re:Security issues? by Reece400 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      From the sounds of it, your home security system is acessible on the internet... that in it's self would make me very wary :S

      Reece,

    7. Re:Security issues? by blair1q · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Right now, on a 2.2GHz/400MHzFSB/1GB266MHzDDR Wintel machine, I'm ripping CDs in CDex, playing MP3s with Winamp, and videos with WMP, while browsing the net (yes, all at once; doesn't happen often, but then neither does this thread).

      No glitches.

      Oh yeah. And UD is running in the background (the only app lower than Normal priority) curing cancer or finding anthrax vaccines or some background-worthy shit like that.

      Load? 100%, naturally. Cost? $1300 (18 months ago) plus sweat equity to install it all (pushbutton Windoze installer; 20 minutes tops for these apps).

      Still no glitches.

    8. Re:Security issues? by nvrrobx · · Score: 5, Informative

      I happen to be a developer on this project.

      It is not just one machine. The system setup is different based on each customers needs.

      Since I don't work in sales or marketing, I can't give you a full rundown, but the product does scale based on the customers specific needs.

    9. Re:Security issues? by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 4, Funny
      Me sees it now... box gets rooted while I'm away from home...

      Me: (arriving home from some LAN party) Pluto, open the Garage door.

      Pluto: I'm afraid I can't to that, Dave.

      Me: Dave? OPEN the GARAGE DOOR PLUTO.

      I'm afraid that this conversation can serve no purpose. Goodbye. (At that moment, Pluto connects to the computer in my car and drives me somewhere to somewhere near Texas...

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    10. Re:Security issues? by Geek+of+Tech · · Score: 2, Funny
      How to break into a house using Pluto for security:
      --------------------

      Step 1: Discover IP address of the unit(s)
      Step 2: Post bogus story to slashdot about MS releasing all code under GPL so everyone will look.
      Step 3: Make sure to have the link in the bogus story to point to Pluto.
      Step 4: Hope that the folk in charge put up the story without reading it. (50/50 chance :P)
      Step 5: Prepare black mask and bag and hope that slashdot knocks Pluto off the face of the earth.

      --
      Stop the Slashdot effect! Don't read the articles!
    11. Re:Security issues? by WuphonsReach · · Score: 2, Funny

      One hack to rule them all?

      ... sorry, couldn't resist ...

      --
      Wolde you bothe eate your cake, and have your cake?
    12. Re:Security issues? by LnxAddct · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe since you are familar with the project you can answer this...On the website I see nothing but information about the product. I don't see anywhere to purchase it. I just see "Home, Security, Telecom, Automation, Entertainment, Personal computing" and no links to something like order here or contact us here... have any idea why not? and Judging from the post, it appears to be based on Linux as well...is it open source and you just by the hardware from Pluto?
      Regards,
      Steve

  2. A little too successful with my PVR :( by the+man+with+the+pla · · Score: 4, Interesting

    TiVo: You love it or you haven't met it.

    I got tivo four years ago and instantly fell deeply in love with it. That love continues to this day, but has changed form. About a year ago, I realized that my giddy passion had given way to serenity, by which I mean that I realized that I just didn't want to watch tv any more, even on tivo. It was tivo that got me to this state of mind. It started by seeing how intrusive commercials were, and how much better tv was without it. The next phase for me was the realization of how manipulative the networks were with their program timing and scheduling; how wonderful to be free of that too! And then last summer I found I had dined at the table of paradise enough. I had actually watched enough episodes of The Simpsons, Futurama, Friends, Seinfeld, Frasier, and tons of other shows. To borrow an analogy from another slashdot writer, it was like the weekly trip to the hardware store after you've bought a new house, where one day you get there and you realize that you just don't need anything else, and you turn around and leave.

    This has been a profound experience for me. And I don't think I could have gotten here without Tivo. Maybe I would have and it would have taken longer, but I like to think it was tivo.

    Now I keep tivo around for the kid (Sesame St, etc).

    --
    The linux hacker
    1. Re:A little too successful with my PVR :( by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So what you are saying is: Thanks to Tivo, you haven't been introduced to new shows that you might like. And now that you're tired of watching repeats of shows you once liked, you are quitting TV completely.

      Not exactly the pursuasive argument you were going for, now is it?

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:A little too successful with my PVR :( by zakezuke · · Score: 2, Funny

      So what you are saying is: Thanks to Tivo, you haven't been introduced to new shows that you might like. And now that you're tired of watching repeats of shows you once liked, you are quitting TV completely.

      I think the best argument for Tivo is you have the magic ability to actually catch interesting things at odd times, so you can be social at normal times and actually having something to talk about, what you watched on tv.

      --
      There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
    3. Re:A little too successful with my PVR :( by dont_think_twice · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Thanks to Tivo, you haven't been introduced to new shows that you might like

      Not exactly the pursuasive argument you were going for, now is it?

      Wow, he is really missing out. All that time he is spending doing constructive things, he could be watching TV.

      I think you are missing the point.

    4. Re:A little too successful with my PVR :( by ghjm · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It isn't TiVo doing this to you.

      The Simpsons, Futurama, Friends, Seinfeld and Frasier represent a generation of television that was compellingly watchable. Some of those shows are still soldiering on, some of them aren't. As they die off, they are being replaced by shows like Survivor, The Bachelor, American Idol and Fear Factor. Yes, there are a few decent shows still being produced, but they are being crowded out of the schedule. I haven't added up the numbers, but I would bet that in the 2000 - 2003 time period there were less than half as many great new shows as there were in 1996 - 1999.

      What it boils down to is, the advertising market has crashed, so budgets for TV series production have disappeared. Reality shows are cheap to produce, and they pull in the numbers. So that's where TV has gone. If you like reality shows, this is a Golden Age. If you don't, welcome to the post-TV consciousness.

      TiVo or no TiVo.

      -Graham

    5. Re:A little too successful with my PVR :( by glitch23 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I got tivo four years ago and instantly fell deeply in love with it. That love continues to this day, but has changed form. About a year ago, I realized that my giddy passion had given way to serenity,

      Is your wife jealous of the Tivo now? Is a divorce in the works? All men are the same. geez.

      --
      this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom. -- Lincoln, Gettysburg Address
  3. -1: Slashvertisement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Hey editors, we can smell when you have product placements as "news". Please, at least note that in the story.

    $15000? No thanks.

    1. Re:-1: Slashvertisement by jrockway · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh god. I'm so tired of posts like the parent. Slashdot's advertising is those banners at the top.

      Not story placement.

      Everytime someone mentions some comercial entity on slashdot some AC or troll thinks it's not an ad. ITS NOT AN AD. The editors posted this story because they thought we'd think it was interesting. And it is.

      Also, if you don't like slashdot, you can leave. We won't be crying :)

      --
      My other car is first.
    2. Re:-1: Slashvertisement by tazzzzz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As the person who posted this, I can say that I have absolutely no affiliation with the company that makes this. It seemed an appropriate topic for slashdot to me, because here's a product that incorporates doubtless dozens of open source projects into a useful, usable package. (At least, that's the idea... I don't have this system to play with...)

      This is, I assure you, not a product placement (unless the /. editors convinced this company to fork over some dough between last night when I submitted this and now when it appeared on the site.)

      Kevin

  4. Here we go again. by MikeXpop · · Score: 5, Funny
    Ever wanted an easy-to-configure, whole-house, internet-accessible, Linux-based VOIP PBX with video, PVR, firewall/router, security system, MP3 player, file server, personal web server, home automation (lights, thermostat) controller?
    Hey, computer? Turn up the heat and tape Miami Vice for me.

    "I'm afraid I can't do that David"

    But my name's Mike. Hey, where'd Poole go?
    --
    Etiquette is etiquette. He kills his mother but he can't wear grey trousers.
    1. Re:Here we go again. by i.r.id10t · · Score: 2, Funny


      Here I am, brain the size of a planet, and they want me to escort the human up to the deck...

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
  5. DIY by Khazunga · · Score: 2, Funny

    $15000 bucks is a little less what I make per year. It'd be much more cost effective if I built one of these myself. Not that I need one, anyway. VoA (Voice over Air), gesture controlled light switches and junk-made file/mp3/web server work perfectly well at my home.

    --
    If at first you don't succeed, skydiving is not for you
  6. This is ridiculous! by linux_user_31337 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why should I shell out $15,000 for something that's an order of magnitude more expensive than the sytem I've built myself?

    I built a MythTV system (using a hacked XBox as a frontend!) with a USB webcam for videoconferencing on my TV for less than $2000. It can do everything the Pluto adverises except home automation, but some X10 devices would take care of that.

    This is a perfect toy for the busy executive who loves using the latest technology but doesn't understand it -- not for us able Linux lovers on slashdot!

    1. Re:This is ridiculous! by sid+crimson · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Why should I shell out $15,000 for something that's an order of magnitude more expensive than the sytem I've built myself?


      I'm going to pick on you here. Not personally, but just because the mood strikes and your post is perfect.

      Slashdotters should take the queue from the "pros" and develop an alternative to sell to your boss.

      You see, we complain about the big salaries our bosses command, and complain that they don't know the tech they use, and leave it at that.

      Instead, perhaps we should be building our bosses (and their rich friends) alternatives to the $15K do-all box for $10K and charge $5K labor to install it in their homes.

      $15K either buys them a box they don't know how to use, *or* a box installed with training.

      Not to mention, some of these guys (my boss and his friends included) think of things they want in addition to the built-in features. If you ask me, that sounds like an extra-cost feature.

      Think about it...

      -sid
    2. Re:This is ridiculous! by timeOday · · Score: 4, Insightful
      This is a perfect toy for the busy executive who loves using the latest technology but doesn't understand it -- not for us able Linux lovers on slashdot!
      Exactly, so how is that ridiculous? I take as a good example of somebody who's probably a lot like me, except they had the guts to make a business out of their convergence box hobby. Good for them! As for whether there's really a market, well I guess they'll find out. But I heard an interview with the owner of a local electronics chain, and he told about people who call up asking for a high-fidelity sound system throughout their new custom home. "$30K? OK. When can you have it done?"
    3. Re:This is ridiculous! by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Informative

      It can do everything the Pluto adverises except home automation, but some X10 devices would take care of that.

      not.

      sorry, but home automation is much more complex than you think it is.

      how about the fact you need to interface tons of input sensors and occupancy sensors (not motion detectors) plus be able to RELIABLY control the important things like heat? a RS485 thermostat is $300.00 for the el-cheapo one. the X10 thermostat from RCS is an absolute piece of junk.

      plus you can easily overwhelm your X10 system in the house if you have lots of modules and command consoles.. oh and you had a $200.00 bridge and repeater installed right? X10 doesn't work work a crap without that.

      Let's add in the weather station so the house can wake you 30 minutes early because of the snowstorm last night or alert you that the cover on the hot-tub has blown off because of high winds.

      a few X10 modules and misterhouse is NOT a home automation system.

      I strongly suggest you go and have a demonstration of a real home automation system, thne you will know what it really is.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  7. Yes, but... by Comatose51 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes, but does it run Linu...

    Oh, wait.

    --
    EvilCON - Made Famous by /.
  8. I've already got the MP3 server by j_sp_r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can custum build it for almost free(just takes me 20 hours of so, but 20 hours against $15/h == 20*15=$300 and only need an old PC, and linux). I've already a MP3 server, soldering a com-port relais board for the lights etc is also possible . The video stuff could be a VCR controlled by you relais :-) or a tv-caputere card with hardware mpeg decoding ($150 or someting, not worth 15000) Why pay $15000 for something you can make yourself and o'course it's much more fun DIY

  9. Now only if it were a female robot. by Alpha27 · · Score: 2, Funny

    cooked, cleaned, played music and gave you updates on all your favorite shows, while having I/O communication (read into the I/O and you will get the joke). Why you can then replace your own girlfriend, and patch her everytime a new kernel came out.

  10. If only . . . by dgrgich · · Score: 2, Funny

    . . . this thing made a good cup of coffee. Then we might be able to talk . . .

  11. Pluto, eh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    I guess Uranus was in use! :-)

    Eagerly awaiting the mod to "-1, Troll".

  12. Hmm by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 4, Funny
    you didn't need that car anyway, did you?

    Not if Pluto comes with four wheels and a V8 engine.

  13. Targeted for non-technical consumers by samdaone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This device is probably targeted for someone who wants a plug and play solution, or does not have the technical knowledge to build their own from a variety of parts offered at the consumer level (server, software, tv tuner, big hard drives, mic...) Someone with some level of putting together a computer can probably come up with a more economic version of this item.

    However, if you do not want to build your own and have money to burn this is a perfect oppurtunity to buy one!

    --

    Make me your friend. All my friends get +1 modifier and I need friends :)

    1. Re:Targeted for non-technical consumers by JVert · · Score: 2, Informative

      Its a creston/AMX contender in the high end home automation market. To give you an idea of how what the market is like, a 15" creston touchscreen can cost $15,000 (thats a client, not the whole system). Home automation installations on average cost 80-200k (some projects go on forever and cost millions).

  14. I'm just curious... by James+A.+C.+Joyce · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...is this actually cheaper and more convenient than just purchasing and/or making the individual systems yourself with your own Linux setup?

    And another thing: is it just me, or is this only news because it's Linux-based?

    --

    Slashdot: when news breaks, we give you the pieces.
  15. I have all that and more, for a lot less by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Sometime back, I experimented with controlling the lights and other household stuff from an extra computer. Made it into a PVR/media player, etc as well. It was ok, but I went back to just turning the lights on and off by hand, and didn't find enough interesting programs to watch anyway. I don't worry about anyone breaking in while I'm gone, because my security system consists of 2 Akita/mix and armed neighbors. I don't even use my cellphone anymore-it was like a tether.

    I wonder what the market for something like this is? I mean $15,000? First Adopters, I thank you for taking the brunt of R&D and other costs. Maybe they are pricing the first ones high to recoup costs, but all their profits are going to pay for the extra bandwidth on their Flash-sucky site. At first I was thinking "Awesome way to advertise your product or service", and then I thought "Oh, wait, maybe not".

    -cp-

    Alaska Bugs Sweat Gold Nuggets

  16. Won't that take the fun out of it? by wmspringer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I would think many if not most slashdot readers would rather create their own system from scratch, both for the fun of it and for the reduced cost.

  17. Pluto by aynrandfan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like a Mikey Mouse operation here.

    --

    ----

    "Ours was a free culture. It is becoming much less so."-Lawrence Lessig

  18. Sorry, no sale. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Security is our top priority. All communication is encrypted using an unbreakable 2048-bit system. The whole Pluto network, including your existing pc's, sits safely behind the protection of the Pluto Core, which includes a commercial-grade Linux server that is not susceptible to the viruses and security breaches you find in Windows pc's.

    These guys are just ASKING for someone to hack their system. As computing power increases, 2048 will take very little time to brute-force (though this probably won't happen for a while). Not susceptible to security breaches? Please. Tell that to Debian and GNU. If this thing connects to the outside world (it does), it can be hacked. End of discussion.

  19. All in one, or many single purpose tools by voisine · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's a classic argument. Is it better to have a single device that does everthing where all features work together under a single uniform interface, or many devices that are all designed to perform a single task and do it well. The problem with the all in one approach is that it's nearly impossible to everything well. What happens when you want the new features of a competing PVR product? Maybe dual sattelite recivers, or HD capability. On the other hand, what if you want to automatically have your tv volume mute and your stereo turn into a quadriphonic speaker phone when you recieve a call. That's harder to do with seperate devices that don't know about each other. What we really need is a standardized control/communication interface so all the seperate devices can communicate and work together, yet any one piece can be replaced or upgraded with a competitors product at any time.

  20. yes.. by relrelrel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Ever wanted an easy-to-configure, whole-house, internet-accessible, Linux-based VOIP PBX with video, PVR, firewall/router, security system, MP3 player, file server, personal web server, home automation (lights, thermostat) controller?"

    Yes, it's called Windows XP :)

    --
    --- any post that takes longer than 20 seconds to write, isn't worth writing
  21. Wealth of common man by Samuel+Duncan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It's quite surprising that people have so much money to spend these days.
    When I was young an offer to buy something besides houses or companies for 15000 $ would be considered to be a tasteless joke. Even for extremely rich people this would be too much. I still remember that there was much talk in the New York high society when Rockefeller bought his wife a collier for 20000 $.
    It seems that capitalism had really achived what the communists always wanted: the make common man really rich.
    Funnily in the 1930ies when some guys predicted exactly this development they were considered extremist fools even in academic circles.

    --
    Over 90 years and counting !
  22. Hmm by sparklingfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ever wanted an easy-to-configure, whole-house, internet-accessible, Linux-based VOIP PBX with video, PVR, firewall/router, security system, MP3 player, file server, personal web server, home automation (lights, thermostat) controller?

    No.


    Not for $15,000 anyway.

  23. Ever wanted an easy-to-configure mortgage... by heironymouscoward · · Score: 3, Funny

    The short answer would be "No".

    The longer answer would be "No, but I'll have some of whatever you're smoking/drinking/injecting/snorting".

    The sympathetic answer would be "No, and I can recommend a very good psychiatrist if you continue to use the terms 'MP3 Player' and $15,000 in the same sentence."

    But I think the most accurate answer would be "BWAAAA HAAA HAAA HAAA HAAA HAAA oh jeez *wipes eyes* HAHHHAAAA *snif*".

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
  24. So the question is... by Valar · · Score: 4, Funny

    when the site gets /.ed, do their lights turn off? Maybe it calls their upstream provider and asks for more bandwidth, automatically?

  25. Better off with a dog. by hyphun · · Score: 2, Funny

    From website: Pluto will protect your home and family, entertain you, save you time, and change your life. Better buy a dog, if you want those things. A whole lot cheaper. You have to stand some occasional drooling, 'course. But hey! nothing new for a geek, who just got word they're making a crossover between LOTR and star Wars! "Frodo, I'm your father!" ----Got Carried away. Excuse me.

  26. Wrong target audience... by igrp · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seriously.
    I realize Slashdot readers as a group are probably pretty diverse with regard to age, race, jobs, background, etcetera. But what unites us is curiosity: we want to know how stuff works, how to solve a specific problem or how others have chosen to tackle those problems. That's what /. is all about, IMHO: discovering how to look at stuff from a different perspective, one you hadn't considered before (that, and killing time at work, of course ;)).

    I'm sure most of us would build an pluto-like device (I'm actually surprised they didn't name it iHouse) ourselves, even if turned out to cost the same, just for kicks...

  27. Can be done WAY cheaper by jgaynor · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How about combining IPchains, MythTV and/or Freevo with MisterHouse and some X10 equipment on a commodity $300 1.5-2 Ghz machine?

    1. Re:Can be done WAY cheaper by tempest303 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You missed the point. It's all integrated, and "easy to use". What you just listed are completely un-integrated, discrete projects. So, to quote jwz, "Linux is only free if your time is worth nothing". Sure, I could spend a ton of time learning to do each of those things for myself, or I could just buy a box that already does it for me.

      That said, the price is way too high, and I'm betting it's not quite as easy to use or configure as they think it is. However, if they made it truly easy to configure and use, and brought the price to more like $5000 (you're paying for software and customization here), then they might have something - I could certainly see the Sharper Image types digging this. Plus, it would probably have the effect of spurring guys from projects like the ones you listed to make their stuff easier to configure and use, and would also likely result in a FreePluto project... bwahahahaha...

    2. Re:Can be done WAY cheaper by chargen · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, but it's still not a PBX (perhaps would be with Asterisk. It would take some pretty intense programming to put a gui on that that'll allow you to drag and drop to transfer calls though.

      Not that Pluto is the answer to everything, but it looks like they aim to have *everything* integrated to a pretty high degree. I wouldn't necessarily use drag and drop call control, but I can see a lot of people being wowed by it.

      -Pete

  28. one unneeded feature by way2trivial · · Score: 2, Funny
    internet accesible?
    Problem I see is, the demographically ideal purchaser?

    never, ever leaves the house

    --
    every day http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Random
  29. Why this costs $15000 by tazzzzz · · Score: 5, Informative

    I should have given some more info knowing that the site would be slashdotted...

    For that price, you get the Pluto Core, which is the Linux-based server. You get some number (unclear to me how many) of media distributors (PCs with DVD drives and network interfaces) that hook up to your TV and the Core to show video and play music. You also get "Orbiters", which are hand-held devices to which you can stream video from your security cameras and control the Pluto system.

    So, we're not talking one Linux PC. It's a whole system of stuff. I've requested more pricing info, because I'm curious how much you have to pay for the various parts. $15K is a lot of money, but this can give technically unsophisticated folks a usable "home of the future" sort of setup.

    Kevin

  30. Been there, done that by krray · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Um, my lowly RedHat 2.1 Linux box was doing all this (except video) back in the early 90's.

    Web, File & Print? Trivial.
    Lights / HVAC? X10
    MP3 music: SliMP3
    (and no, you don't need to buy to use their software -- I just happen to own a couple of them :)

    Answering machine I hacked up waaay back when myself (still use it via ISDN inbound :). Today MP4's are flying across the network to a Powerbook for watching movies on any TV wirelessly.

    For $15K I'd spend it on a Dual G5 with Dual monitors (why not? :) and every toy out there. Probably have a few $K left over... And no, I did not read the article.

    Now -- I did look around the (html version) of the site. Nice little product, though IMHO over priced. I hacked it all up for under $3K (including X10 re-wired outlets as needed). A couple of [radio] all-in-one remotes from The Shack and I can control the lights, TV, and stereo as needed throughout the house. I have a remote for each floor actually, though Radio Shack has since discontinued the model I like -- the new one doesn't work with X10 unit codes 11+ anymore for some reason.

  31. I'd spend at least 15k on a home system by bfree · · Score: 2, Funny
    If I was building my own version of something like this ...
    • Alarm System: 2k
    • Phone System: 1k
    • Home Automation: 2k
    • Entertainment: 5k
    • Personal Computer: 10k
    • Everything Running Linux: Priceless
    Forgive me!
    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  32. Very Cool But.... by mlg9000 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    1. Open source software that does everything this thing does is available for free.

    2. To do something like this on your own you really CAN'T use old PC parts you've got laying around the house. Assuming you plan to do the PVR functions you'll need a decent processor (otherwise you could get by with 500mhz), lots of memory, a very large RAID array (can't have all your work lost to one bad drive, plus video/mp3's are going to need some room), a good UPS, heavy duty power supply system, cooling that won't die on you, and a couple higher end video capture cards... That all probably all adds up to around ~$3500. The good thing is this is upgradable and expandable for the future.

    3. Next you need some way to interact with the system in a easy and natural way. Voice control isn't exactly ready and if you go with touchscreen LCD remotes.. you'll end up spending nearly as much as this system. RF remotes connected to a computer that distributes video to TV's thoughout the house (so you can see what you are doing) is probably cheapest and easiest way to do this. Say ~$1000 for that (including extras you might need)

    4. Lots of time... For someone who's fairly tech savvy say two weeks worth of work or about ~$3000. Most people would probably who are tech savvy would consider this part of the fun an not an expense though. If that's not you you'll have to pay someone to do it for you.

  33. Does it come with multiple voices? by sharkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Can you get James Bond? (Pierce Brosnon, not George Lazenby)

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  34. Bachelor pad by isorox · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Ever wanted an easy-to-configure, whole-house, internet-accessible, Linux-based VOIP PBX with video, PVR, firewall/router, security system, MP3 player, file server, personal web server, home automation (lights, thermostat) controller? I just came across the Pluto which claims to do all of this (and more, of course!). It'll set you back $15,000 if you're living in a small bachelor pad, but you didn't need that car anyway, did you?"

    I assume you get the small bachelor pad thrown in for free? Might be worth it then,.

  35. Crestron and AMX by euggie · · Score: 2, Informative

    (This post is really for the folks who haven't seen what exactly is home automation. Before I started doing this stuff I was completely unaware how mature that home automation industry is. The Pluto is a very-low-end system that doesn't do a whole lot, and the price really reflects that.)

    While it is probably true that no other product integrates even 2 out of 5 of the home electronics systems, in the world of home automation and home integration, folks tends to pick the best-of-breed hardware and integrate them.

    I can say this: I do this for a living.

    For instance, one generally uses Vantage or Lutron for lighting or other high-voltage controls, Radionics and Pelco (among others) for fire/intrusion control. We can integrate with /any/ home entertainment/theater systems. We can integrate with climate control systems too, and along the way make it all web accessible. I work for a Crestron shop here, but many other folks uses AMX as well. It's pretty standard in this space.

    The reality is that you can't do true home automation for $15K, or by yourself. Installing high-voltage, and sometimes low-voltage wiring, requires a electrician's license. (So you have to hire someone and pay labor.) Low-end AV equipment controlled by IR can be easily DIY, but to do the really cool stuff, there are many AV gears that can be controlled by RS-232. (Rotel and Meridian, for example.) With that you can get feedback of what the device is doing, and display that information on the UI; having that information helps you make much more reliable code too. (Try having your system find out the volume level on your IR-controlled AMP, for instance.)

    The stuff is not cheap, but it's solid and well supported. We have projects between $200k to $2mil+, and there's no shortage of people who has that kind of money and are willing to spend it in their house. These systems has much better uptime than any of my Linux, OS X or Windows boxes; they are so stable, in fact, I heard that the BART in California uses Crestron and AMX as part of a redundant system.

    You can go cheap too: If you just want an IR controlled home theater with existing IR controlled gears, RS-232 control of an alarm system, plus some minor goodies like web access, I can prob do it for less than $2000. (Notice no real wiring required here.) Start with a Crestron QM-RMC or MP2E.

    Check out http://www.crestron.com/ and http://www.amx.com/

  36. Re:Try it before opening pie hole by mattdm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Errr, or there's the other alternative, the one the original post suggested -- ditch TV altogether. It's amazing how well it works.

  37. Maybe you *think* you could by Krashed · · Score: 2, Insightful

    While it is possible to have many of the features installed in your home for a fraction of the price, most people, probably including yourself wouldn't know where to begin. Pluto is a simple to use/install system that takes care of all the hard stuff for the end user. Yes your can have Freevo/Myth but will it intergrate with your phone system, yes, but you must install a voice modem, pray for drivers, recompile kernel, write software, do some voodoo and have a half ass system.
    No, Pluto isn't for these die hard geeks out there but most of you geeks probably can't afford this stuff anyway. You probably wouldn't even care about it if it was based on any other OS but because it is a Linux based core, you are whinning that it is too expensive or finding any other flaws to cut it down. I am a Windows user. I like Macs. I have 2 linux boxes running my home/webserver. Would I buy a Pluto? No. Not now. In the future, maybe. But for now, I am looking into what the system has to offer and am already looking for ways to implement this into my own system.