Cringely's 2004 Predictions
somethinghollow writes "Cringely's 2004 Predictions are out, and he makes a very interesting claim concerning Linux: 'The SCO debacle has created a crisis within the Linux community. They pretend that it hasn't, but it has. This will come to a head in 2004 with either the development of a new organizational structure for Linux or the start of its demise. Linux has to grow or die, and the direction it takes will be determined in 2004.' With a claimed 70% successful prediction rate, you at least have to listen..."
I predicted that Microsoft's Palladium security plan, now called Trustworthy Computing, would be distrusted and stall. That looks right to me.
Predicting that a microsoft security product isn't reliable? Predicting that a microsoft product is late?
Cringley is THE ORACLE!!
"They like to pretend that it hasn't, but it has."
Yeah, just like I pretend that Cringley doesn't matter, but he does.
Bowie J. Poag
It used to fit on one cd, now it's 3 or more.
We are the people our parents warned us about.
I mean, isn't this like saying that the temperature tomorrow will either be lower of higher than today?
Come back in 365 more days and see how I did.
As 2004 is a leap year with 366 days, I'm guessing Cringely will get this prediction wrong...
Check #3, for example, we _know_ MSR is working on this (there was a story here recently). Or #4, which is simply general trend. #7 is a BS: "Someone is going to come out of this a big winner. I just don't know who it is." Most of the rest are the same, including #15. Gee, tell me more, old toad ;-P
My other Beowulf cluster is... er...
I predict 2004 will be different than 2003. I also predict that my prediction will be right. Now why don't I get coverage when my predictions are more accurate?
SCO:
Mostly Harmless
Don't think of it as a flame---it's more like an argument that does 3d6 fire damage