Slashdot Mirror


RFID Casino Chips

scubacuda writes "Could casinos be the next Gillette or Wal-Mart? New Scientist and others report that casinos could soon start using RFID tags to spot counterfeits and thefts, and also to monitor the behaviour of gamblers. Embedded RFID tags should make the chips much harder to counterfeit, and placing tag readers at staff exits could cut down on theft by employees. (With companies like Infosys helping clients identify and plan pilot RFID projects, we'll no doubt be seeing more and more companies dabbling in this area. Those interested in reading objections to RFID use should check out the position paper issued by CASPIAN, EPIC, Privacy Rights Clearinghouse, Junkbusters, ACLU, Meyda Online, EFF, and PrivacyActivism.)"

73 of 271 comments (clear)

  1. Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They can more easily monitor your swing of bet levels......

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    1. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 4, Funny

      Not when I get my RFID reader and read the tags on the cards in blackjack ;)

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    2. Re:Ouch for card counters... by goofballs · · Score: 4, Informative

      card counting is legal everywhere in the states. the casinos in nevada are allowed to not let you play if they suspect you're card counting, but it's not against the law. this has been tested in the courts.

    3. Re:Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Card counting is ALWAYS legal, as long as there is no mechanical assistance...

      :-)

      But, most casinos don't allow you to play BJ there is they think you are a counter. I've never heard of a casino being 'advantage' player friendly. If they did, I can only guess they'd have the worst possible game set up...as far as dealer stands, payoffs...shuffle after each deal.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    4. Re:Ouch for card counters... by glorf · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The article talks mainly about being able to identify the chips as being authentic. I think that installing the equipment at each betting spot on the table to read the different IDs, lookup the dollar value in a central database and do the math to figure out total bet would be a little much. It would take some serious hardware to do real-time tracking of every chip in play. Considering that dealers, pit-bosses and the eye in the sky already are fairly good at catching counters (who can't take the casino for too much if they don't want to get banned), I don't think the ROI would be there for such a massive system.

      Having a few readers in the cage to verify authenticity before giving out cash in exchange, would be a much more efficient use of RFID.

    5. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Pave+Low · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I believe there's already technology that can constantly monitor bettings, though I'm not sure how widely its implemented. The eye in the sky can see that without RFID.

      Anyways, spotting a lone card counter really isn't that hard anyways. To be a really effective counter, your betting levels needs to swing wildely from 10-1 if you're using a hi-lo count, and pit bosses can see it a mile away.

      It's team play that is really hard for casinos to spot, like when a spotter can call other people in when a shoe is hot, and they can bet huge.

      --
      SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
    6. Re:Ouch for card counters... by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Couldn't you just take the chips home..and microwave them? I can't see them requiring the RFID working to prove they were their chips...

      Something that can fail isn't the customers fault...if it was proven otherwise to be genuine.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    7. Re:Ouch for card counters... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Even if that's true, which I'm not at all certain of, I don't see it as an issue. You have no right to card counting.

      In fact, I don't see this as an issue at all. The casino already knows how many chips I buy, they can keep track of how many I win, and I cash them in before I leave.

      The real issue with RFIDs is that they can be used to track people over time, and for purposes much different than their announced use. I'd have absolutely no problem with Wal-Mart (or whoever) using RFIDs to track inventory if they were somehow turned off when I purchased the merchandise, somewhat like the magnetic devices that are currently used for anti-theft measures.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    8. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Gunzour · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was at the Hard Rock Casino in Vegas two years ago (during Defcon), and the dealer there was showing us how to count cards while we played. This is the same Hard Rock that got taken for huge amounts of money by the MIT card counting crew. The dealer told us that they will usually let you count cards, even if they know you are doing it, unless you start winning a lot of money. The reason: Amateur card counters tend to make mistakes that benefit the house. Unless you are really good at card counting, you may be better off sticking with basic strategy.

      He had a good point, but the next year I went back and they had installed continuous card shufflers at most of their tables. You can't count cards against these machines since there is no beginning or end to the shoe.

    9. Re:Ouch for card counters... by leonardluen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      those continuous shufflers aren't allways as good as the casino wants them to be...you are correct that you can't count them, but i believe sometimes they can have patterns as to how they shuffle.

      some people are really good at tracking a shuffle of a normal dealer, i have seen it done before without use of anything but your own brain...you can use some of these same techniques on a continuous shuffler. it is a lot harder than counting though!

      and it is a good thing that not everyone counts(successfully) otherwise all the casinos would switch to these continuous shufflers.

    10. Re:Ouch for card counters... by B'Trey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Sigh. A "right" has a specific meaning. Not to put too fine a point on it, but it doesn't mean that you CAN do something, it means no one can interfere with you doing it. Card counting isn't illegal but if the casino kicks you out for doing it, you have no recourse. You can't sue the casion for interfering with your right to card count.

      --

      "The legitimate powers of government extend only to such acts as are injurious to others." Thomas Jefferson.

    11. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      In Atlantic City (as far as I remember -- its been awhile), they have to let you play. But they can instruct their dealers to do a lot of things to make your life as a counter quite miserable. Like only work very shallow into the shoe, for starters.

      They can also force you to flat-bet (bet the same amount every hand during the shoe), which pretty much defeats the main purpose of card counting.

    12. Re:Ouch for card counters... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is it illegal for the casino to count cards?

      No, it's called preferential shuffling, and it's perfectly legal. However, if they used RFIDs in the cards, at the very least they'd have to tell you, in which case no one would play blackjack at that casino. Well, actually, some people probably would, but not as many.

      And this wouldn't be legal in Atlantic City, because all game rules in Atlantic City have to be approved by the government.

    13. Re:Ouch for card counters... by geekee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      When I was in Reno some time ago, I noticed a lot of casinos advertising 1 deck blackjack. I'm guessing they think they can take money from people who think they can count cards, but especially after a few of the complimentary drinks, can't keep track as well as they thought.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    14. Re:Ouch for card counters... by bigbigbison · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You could do that to one or two chips and get away with it. But if you come in with a whole pocket full of them, they would probably kick you out and bar you.

      Casinos are all about trying to make the customer happy so they can take their money. The minute you go from someone they can make money from to someone they suspect is trying to unfairly take money from them they start playing hardball.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    15. Re:Ouch for card counters... by MC_Cancer_Pants · · Score: 2, Informative

      To validate the chips, which are worthless, for cash, which HAS worth, they would have to check the RFID. So: Microwaving them would kill the RF signal, yes, making the chips completely worthless, I don't see why this is a threat.

    16. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Best+ID+Ever! · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The dealer told us that they will usually let you count cards, even if they know you are doing it, unless you start winning a lot of money.

      Even then, they usually won't kick you out. When I was counting cards once, they switched to a new dealer who wouldn't talk to me, and reshuffled after every hand. I got the message and made my exit.

    17. Re:Ouch for card counters... by Prong · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Casinos like to foster 2 myths about card counting. First, that it's illegal (it's not), and second that you'll be declared persona non grata if they "catch" you doing it. The truth is that casinos tolerate counters on a regular basis, for a number of reasons:
      • Card counting is damn hard. As an exercise, cut 20 random coupons out of the Sunday supplement, memorize the products and the discounts. Go to your local supermarket, buy a normal week's groceries, taking advantage of the coupons (without looking at them), and factoring in the "advantage buys". If you're single, buy 2 weeks, with an eye on the stuff you don't buy much (toilet paper, cleaning stuff). Keep a running total in your head. At checkout, if your total cost and total coupon savings are within 25 cents of the actuals, you may have a future as a card counter.
      • Given the fact that most people who try card counting are both bad and obvious, the casinos don't comp them, which cuts the cost of business. Overall, casinos understand shaving odds. After all, two single number bets on the roulette table shaves the house odds. Which brings me to the third point:
      • I know exactly zero card counting systems which push the player into postive odds. The really good systems cut the house advantage to .5% or slightly better, but the odds are still with the house in the long run. The counter is depending on a run to make his or her money, along with the right betting scheme (counters tend to be progressive bettors).

      That being said, an extremely good counter can bet on (excuse the pun) being blacklisted in Las Vegas, but that's a tiny, tiny percentage of players overall. An average card counter will simply be denied perks, and be viewed with some suspicion. If you play 250-500 hands a year, the comps more than offset the average counter's edge. If you play more that that, it depends on how good a counter you are.

      Now that I've vented, I'll get back on topic. RFIDs in casino chips bother me not. The privacy implications for someone who gambles are nil, and the advantage in more accurate play tracking so outweigh any privacy issues, it's not even funny. You don't take chips home (are you stupid? they have cash value only in the casino), the first thing you do when you sit at a table in Vegas is utter the words "I want to be rated", and _every casino wants to keep its player to itself. Hence their reluctance to sell their mailing lists.

      A Final Thought: If you find yourself up $75k at the $20 minimum table and a host offers you a suite and RFB, ask for show tickets, take the deal and walk away. And send me some money for my sage advice. :)

      -Prong
  2. wont stem employee theft. by Lumpy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So they now have to stop in the kitchen to wrap that stack of $100.00 chips in tinfoil before they leave...

    rfid is not a theft prevention solution for small items.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:wont stem employee theft. by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 5, Funny

      just outlaw tinfoil under the DMCA.. problem solved

    2. Re:wont stem employee theft. by dustmote · · Score: 3, Funny

      Something tells me that their hiring bonuses would cost more than employee theft is currently costing them, if they tried that little stunt. :) Still, it would make for some interesting want ads... "Do you want a fast-paced exciting job with great benefits? Do you not object to daily probing of your rectum? Have we got a job for you!!!" (I think they already have ads like this in Nevada...)

      --


      -1, "1337" speak
    3. Re:wont stem employee theft. by ajrs · · Score: 2, Funny

      They can't have my hat until they pry it from my cold, dead fingers.

    4. Re:wont stem employee theft. by bigbigbison · · Score: 5, Interesting

      At the casino I worked at, employees who have acess to the kitchen are not the same ones that have access to enough chips to make it worthwhile. There are cameras everywhere in a casino, out on the floor as well as behind the scenes.

      I honestly can't think that employee theft of chips is really that huge of an issue since the ammount of money that each cashier has is counted at the end of shift and if you are off enough money to make stealing chips worth it, say $500+ then they will not let you work there long if you are off that much very often. They even went so far as to make us use clear cups with clear liquid in them in the cage so that we could drop things in them.

      Dealers are under a lot more scrutiny from the cameras than cashiers. There are dedicated cameras looking at the chips on the table.

      At the casino I worked at, chips in the chip bank, (in storage) are supposed to be counted and verified every shift so a theft there would be caught fairly easilly.

      When I worked in the cashier cage and was the banker in charge of the cashiers in the cage, it wasn't uncommon to call down to the vault and have half a million dollars in cash delivered. So with that kind of money floating around, if I was going to steal, i wouldn't have been chips. If, as an employee, you are going to steal from the casino, you need to go big becasue if you do it multiple times, you will get caught.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    5. Re:wont stem employee theft. by UserGoogol · · Score: 2

      FOOL! You're supposed to keep your hat tightly on your head! If you have your hands around it to the point where they have to pry it off... it's too late. They have already gotten your... information.

      --
      "Never attribute to malice that which can be adequately explained by stupidity." -- Hanlon's Razor
  3. I'll let them RFID me... by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...as long as they let me RFID their cards...

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  4. Re:Well.. by goofballs · · Score: 2, Informative

    they'd have to add a *lot* more infrastructure to link you to the chips- eveytime you lost a bet, they'd need to checkin your chips, when you won, they'd need to checkout chips to you, etc. imagine that at someplace like a craps table. and of course, you'd need to sign up first just to be able to bet. ain't gonna happen.

  5. I wonder what took them so long... by aquarian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The real news here is that it took them so long! I sort of assumed they were doing this kind of thing already -- the fraud prevention stuff goes without saying, but I'm surprised they haven't been analyzing playing patterns with this technology too.

  6. Oh no,! They'll.. wait.. what does this add? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As soon as you walk into a casino you're already under the eye of man many cameras monitoring the place. What will this add? I mean Casinos are already Big Brother incarnate, All RFID chips will mean is that you can't cheat.

  7. Link me to them... by tgd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is a great use for RFID tags. Watch all the chips, watch where the move, and track which ones I have.

    I love to go to the casino and play card games like Blackjack or more importantly Craps. Accurate tracking of chips tagged to me would mean two things: accurate comping and the ability to have a technical solution to ensuring payouts are correct.

    Those of you who have played craps at a busy table will know what I mean -- the accuracy of your payouts when you win is always in the hands of the "dealer" working your half of the table. I've been payed wrong many times, sometimes in my favor, sometimes not. Sometimes money comes in from bets I forgot I had on the table, sometimes I wonder if I got missed on a payout.

    If this means that questioning a missed payout can be more accurate or means at a minimum the casino can see in aggregate when they have someone working the table who consistently makes payout errors, more power to them.

    This isn't a privacy issue. If you think you have one spec of anonymity or privacy in a casino, you're nuckin futs.

    1. Re:Link me to them... by garcia · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it is more to catch cheaters (placing late bets and stacking high value chips under the others after the hands are played) and more importantly watch card counters and their betting habbits.

    2. Re:Link me to them... by fishbowl · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It shows that you really do play, thanks for posting tgd.

      People whose gambling experience consists of losing a roll of nickles in a slot machine, don't get it: You don't really want anonymity. You want the casino to know you're there, that you're playing, etc. You want to play in tourneys. You want comps. You want them to know you played, win or lose. If you're not picking up comps, you're missing half the strategy.

      You don't want anonymity, you want them to notice you and say "Hello mister TGF, can I get you anything?"

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
    3. Re:Link me to them... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This isn't a privacy issue. If you think you have one spec of anonymity or privacy in a casino, you're nuckin futs.

      Excellent point that sums up the whole thing. After all, the entire point of a casino is to prey on peoples' willing suspension of disbelief.

      How can anyone who walks in and puts their cash on the table think that the casino companies aren't going to fleece them from the moment they enter? That those ridiculously overdone venues with their flashing neon lights just built themselves out of the Nevada desert?

      On the other side of the roulette wheel, you have people who *do* think they can beat the house... the people who buy lottery tickets at home in blissful ignorance of the laws of mathematics.

      Neither of these groups is going to care about RFID. One group knows that they're entering a fantasy world, and the other wouldn't believe you if you told them.

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    4. Re:Link me to them... by mike_mgo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I doubt the chips would be tagged to individual betters. As another poster mentioned, everytime you won or lost a bet the indivivual chips would have to be logged onto and off of your comp card.

      The best that could be hoped for is to maybe see a flow of chips. What I mean is for example: maybe they see that poker players prefer to play craps and not blackjack while they wait for a poker table to open up. So then the casino could decide to shift some craps tables over near the poker room.

      I just don't see how this could help with missed payouts or monitoring bet size or things like that unless the chips were "checked in and out" to individuals as bets were won or lost. And I can't see casinos implementing something like this because it would slow the games down (and would slow down who quickly the casino would be winning money).

      So other than to prevent stealing and counterfeiting of chips I'm hard pressed to see too many other uses for this technology in a casino, either benefical or harmful to gamblers.

    5. Re:Link me to them... by ad0gg · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I play Poker when I gamble in vegas. Low limit tables ($2 $4) usuaully have beginners or drunks. Any person who has an average level of skills should easily break even if not win money even with high percentage casino rakes. Plus you get free drinks and comps.

      --

      Have you ever been to a turkish prison?

    6. Re:Link me to them... by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thats why I play Poker when I gamble in vegas. Low limit tables ($2 $4) usuaully have beginners or drunks.

      Good point... for all my ranting about mathematics, I still like to play the ponies on occasion, for the same reason. There is a large enough mass of people who play based on the horses' names, random numbers, or the color of the jockey's silks to overcome the house and state's cut.

      In fact, I could be accused of not having a dog in this fight... I've never been to a casino! The closest I've come was playing Video Poker in a Shreveport truck stop (put in two quarters, lost one hand, won two quarters on the next, cashed out). Who knows, I may go in, be seduced by das blinkenlichts, and join the other beginners at your table...

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    7. Re:Link me to them... by 4of12 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You don't want anonymity

      Yes, as long as you're interested in getting the comps. And, most casinos seem to respect their clients desire to be left alone, etc.

      I'm not sure how it works when you cash in large quantities of chips (my best craps win was only $500 - a single bet).

      But there is a threshhold where the cash transaction becomes reportable to tax authorities. In those instances it would be advantageous to cash-out incrementally to avoid the trigger threshhold.

      RFID chips might make this more difficult.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    8. Re:Link me to them... by curunir · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You're making the assumption that you lose money over time. In that case, you absolutely want them to know how large of a donation you're making so they can give you the appropriate tote bag. But for people who play in a manner in which the house does not have a statistical edge (read: card counters), this kind of tracking is a pain in the neck.

      Ever notice when you're sitting at a blackjack table and the pit boss comes over and asks the dealer how you're doing? If you think this is just about comps, you're fooling yourself. Casinos want to know whenever someone is up so they know who to watch for being a counter. Since there's nothing illegal about counting, the game is really about them identifying the counter before he takes too much of their money. It's that cat and mouse game that's where the real fun in Vegas lies for a lot of us.

      That's what these RFID's are about...they're upping the ante for more simply identifying card counters. If you can have a computer monitor whether a player is up or down, you drastically reduce the number of people you have to watch. Currently, if you feel the pit boss is taking note of you, you can just color out and move to a different table. With RFIDs, they'd much more easily be able to watch you by the security cameras. That and they'd be able to track you between tables unless you visit the cashier every time (a pain, especially when you hit that magic $10,000 mark.)

      They can talk about employee theft all they want, but as other posters have pointed out, security measures are already extremely tight and employee theft isn't really that big of an issue. The bigger issue is that blackjack has been broken statistically but is still makes very good profits because the vast majority of players are clueless. This seems like just another salvo in the war against the clued-in.

      --
      "Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos!"
    9. Re:Link me to them... by Jboy_24 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I know people are worried that a casino will start tracking that a Customer Relations person gave a well-known married male High Roller $1000 chip number 87654321 which four hours later was cashed by a woman of "questionable employment." Is it fair that the casino now knows the "social habits" of that high roller? Probably not. Suppose the well-know high roller was a Senator.

      If casinos starting ratting out the actions of the high rollers, highrollers would just go somewhere else.

      I saw an interview with a guy who helps highrollers out (forget the "official name")....
      it was deffinatly suggested that not only do the Casinos know about the girls, booze and drugs, in some cases they faciliate it.

      In your example, if they found that the high rollers chips were getting spent by a women of questionable employment, they'd probably just check to make sure the high roller was happy with the "Services rendered" and make sure he wasn't robbed.

  8. Wow by jjoyce · · Score: 4, Funny

    This really changes the scrupulous image that the casinos had going for them.

  9. It's a private business. by Ophidian+P.+Jones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As such, they are free to do whatever they like to stem losses, gain advantage over customers, etc.

    If you don't like it, you can go to another casino that doesn't use RFID chips. Ain't America grand?

  10. Private property by El · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The chips are the private property of the Casino... don't they have a right to do anything they please with them? Granted, they should post a notice on the doors saying "Warning, chips protected by RFID", but if having your chips tracked bothers you, simply don't gamble there. RFID itself is not the problem; using fraud or coercion to trick or force people into being tracked against their will would be a problem.

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  11. More power to 'em by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's finally happened. The SlashThink phenomenon of "RFID is bad" has officially deteriorated into irrelevancy. This time, we're apparently supposed to think that RFID in casinos has something to do with our rights. It doesn't, and shouldn't. Nobody goes into a casino against their will, and nobody should be surprised that casinos exist for the sole purpose of tracking and taking money. For casinos to *not* use RFID to their advantage would be stupid and irresponsible.

    1. Re:More power to 'em by Mal-2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly. After all, the chips are the property of the casino, only the money they are worth is yours. I don't have a problem with the casino tracking something they own. Want to break the tracking? Cash out, get new chips (there or somewhere else). It's that simple. I *really* have no problem with RFIDing chips that are not meant to move from table to table, such as roulette chips. You're required to cash out when you leave (assuming you have anything left, which a lot of people don't).

      As for card counting, I have done it quite openly. The fact is they don't care if you're counting cards at the $3 minimum/$25 maximum table. They'll just be more aggressive in providing the free drinks, both to get you drunk and to distract you from your count. I'm sure the story is different on the high-roller tables.

      The only game I'll drink while playing is roulette, and that only when I already have my favorable numbers sussed out. The main difficulty is finding a wheel that's out of true, and figuring out its tendencies. In my experience, 10-15% of the wheels out there are out of true enough to give YOU the advantage over the house. Once you've figured out what numbers to play (or more accurately, what segment of the wheel), you can drink all you like. All you have to do is remember what you've already figured out.

      I've openly admitted to pit bosses that I chose a particular table because the wheel is somewhat predictable. They let me keep on playing anyhow. I've even had them stand there and watch, rather than being called over every time the dealer has to pay me stacks in excess of $300. They know what I'm doing, but there's nothing illegal about it. If they don't want me to do it, they should pull the table out of service and replace it with one in better condition (which actually happened to me once in the Bahamas). It's not like I'm betting "under the radar" either -- if I find a "hot" wheel, it's not unusual to be throwing $80 a spin on the table ($10 x 8 numbers, all in sequence on the wheel).

      For those who go to Vegas, I'll tell you that the last time I was there I found nicely biased tables at both the Sahara and the Lady Luck. I took the Lady Luck for a hundred or so, which I spent somewhere else in the same casino (so I doubt they mind), but the Sahara I took for about $400 and only played half of that back. My winnings at roulette covered the entire cost of our trip, save for vehicle wear and tear.

      You do need a resonably large starting sum to pull this off. If you don't have enough money to survive 20 losses before hitting a winner (at 35:1), then don't play. $100 is generally a minimum starting sum, since most tables require $5 on every spin. And you COULD lose it all if you play the wrong table. I was $200 down from playing the wrong tables before I found the one I could predict, and won $600 in 30 minutes, leaving me up $400. So don't expect that it's a given that you will win. You may have to invest a few hundred bucks in acquiring the skill of reading an imbalanced wheel. It's well worth it though -- I leave Las Vegas with more money than I arrived with about 2/3 of the time. I'm sure anyone with the ability to do rough statistical modeling in their head can do the same.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
  12. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by introverted · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Why would anyone even take the chips out of the casino anyway?

    I doubt they care too much if you take the chips out of the casino. After all, chips that go away don't have to be converted back into cash -- it's just that much extra profit.

    What they don't want is for you to walk out the door with a stack of $1 chips and bring them back made to look like $100 chips. Presumably the RFID would also make it easier for them to detect fake chips that had never been in any casino before.

  13. Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Posting anonymously under fear of karma loss from that knee gently jerking back and forth in the Slashdot community. "Ahhhh! He's not agreeing with my anti-RFID stance! Heretic! Mod him down!")

    How does this even remotely relate to "your rights"? Casino chips are the equivalent of "disney cash" in theme parks, IE under normal circumstances they are only used within the casino itself. Preventing loss would make the casino more money, and they might even use that to raise your pay tables when you're gaming.

    The articles mention monitoring gamblers, but come on... you're in a casino! Your movements are tracked by a hundred cameras from the time you walk in to the time you walk out. Casino employees on the floor are designed to monitor your movement and habits and either 1) ask you to leave or 2) give you a free buffet coupon, depending on what you are doing. You have no privacy whatsoever and very little anonymosity in a casino. Sometimes that works out to your advantage.

    Yes, there are bad uses for RFID. I don't see this as being one of them. Next thing you know people will be crying out because a warehouse wants to use RFID on crates for inventory control.

    Oh, wait...

    1. Re:Yes, privacy in a casino is highly sought by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Interesting

      RFID has already been proposed and, I believe, used by casinos in limited amounts for counting.

      Casinos do NOT lose money by people taking chips. In fact, they encourage it by making their chips flashy, and having periodic "souvenir" designs. Chips cost around $.55 IIRC in bulk (last time I checked many years ago) for a nice design.

      Chips often have markings on the edges that are machine-readable, generally used to prevent counterfeiting and for counting.

      Casinos are generally more interested in people bringing chips INTO the casino, not out. That could be indicative of a group of folks working together.

      I'm mostly concerned about RFID encoded into legal-tender, not so much casino chips. This may appear to be a salami attack on the country, but I don't think it will lead to that slippery slope.

  14. That's it then by burgburgburg · · Score: 2, Funny
    Craps in Louie's garage from now on.

    No more Wayne Newton. No more free drinks (except a swig from that bottle of Thunderbird that Louie always has lying around). And not even a remotely comparable level of hookers.

    I'm going to go cry now.

  15. Hilarious by Pave+Low · · Score: 4, Insightful
    All this crowing about privacy in a private establishment that has cameras covering every square inch of the property, that use computer databases and face-scanning technology to track counters and scammers, that have security everywhere because millions of dollars are passed around everyday.

    And also watched by the government gaming commissions closely, lest their gambling license get taken away or worse.

    And you're worried about fucking RFID technology in their chips?

    Casinos are one of the few places you should absolutely stay away if you are so paranoid like that.

    --
    SIG:Slashdot: indymedia for nerds.
  16. Casinos will love this! by Coryoth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This most likely will happen.

    I used to work doing data visualisation for casinos - nice pretty visualisations showing slot machine usage. It was a huge hit with the casinos that used it. Most casinos use customer cards you see - you earn bonus points for awards if you put your card in the reader of the slot machine while you play. That allows the the casino to track your slot machine spending. More importantly it allows you to create visualisations of slot activity broken down by demographics (of course they collect a few personal details when they assign you your awards card...) so that they can better direct promotions, reorganise the slots on the floor (knowing where to place a bank of new slot machines can be worth a few million dollars!) etc.

    The big problem was that while you could track turnover volume on the gaming tables, you just couldn't track the movement of players very well - there was just no information on that. With this they can have you swipe your awards card when you collect your chips, then watch those chips disperse about the tables. More importantly they can track the ebb and flow - movement vectors for the chips about the floor - that can be very useful information.

    This will be a huge boon to the casino industry, who are always lookign for that new way to fleece a few more dollars of the statistically ignorant.

    Jedidiah.

  17. Missouri laws by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It is illegal to "pass chips" at casinos in Missouri (ie, Kansas City "boats" as they are called). Presumably to track how much you bet. They also do macro-monitoring (if you call RFID tags micromonitoring) of chips. They fill a card out with your name and some other info when you first sit down at a table, after you give them your casino card, which is a credit card like card. this card also tracks your spending/winning and keeps track of "compensation" "awards" called "comps" by regulars i think.

    RFID tags won't be much different. Who cares really?

  18. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by OECD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not like they'll be tracking you with their chips at the grocery store.

    No, they'll be tracking you at the tables. "Comps" are bestowed based on how much money you wager. If the chips are associated with you when they're sold, then they can track where and when you wagered it and comp you accordingly.

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  19. IMO not like Gillette or Wal-Mart. by pherris · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Casino chips are generally meant to stay in the casino while Gillette or Wal-Mart sell items that are meant to leave the store. In theory Wally World could embed a RFID in all the shoes they sell and then profit from the data gained by tracking you walking around their stores or places that would like to sell your RFID movement data. I don't see the same problem with casino chips. A business (or casino) has the right to watch you while you are on their property. I'll give them that but tracking me past that is unacceptable.

    RFIDs can be used for good. My Ford Focus ZTW has a RFID chip on the key. If the correct ID isn't there the car won't (and shouldn't atleast) start. Adding extra keys and programming them is a simple task too.

    IMO this shouldn't raise the same concern that the Wal-Mart problem does, which could be a real nightmare.

    --
    "And a voice was screaming: 'Holy Jesus! What are these goddamn animals?'" - HST
  20. Just another way to track your play by WebGangsta · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Casinos are already tracking your play. Being able to track an individual chip enhances their information flow.

    Those gamblers smart enough to play with a players card (slot club) so that they can earn comps and get a slight percentage higher in returns know that they're being tracked. Of course, it's easier to do so at the slot machines where the computers can determine your exact coin-in and convert that to a specific number of points to throw into your club account.

    At the tables, the casinos still track an individual's play via the pit bosses. While it's now a fairly automated/computerized instant process, it used to be done all on paper and entered into a system later. Regardless, pit bosses would still evaluate what your average bet was, determine the approximate number of hands per hour that you were playing, and then give you a rating. I don't foresee this process changing, as this allows the casinos to use a bit of fudge factor to favor some guests more if they're tipping, friendly, and happy versus the mean grouchy players.

    What other benefits can the casino do by tracking individual chips? What about being able to monitor how a chip moves from game to game? Will it allow casinos to cut down the number of pit bosses? (probably not, for other reasons such as security) Are more chips moving from the blackjack tables to the pai gow poker tables? Would this affect gaming decisions that the casino makes regarding the blackjack rules, so it keeps players at the table longer? How about making the whole betting process more automated by being able to verify the total amount of money in a stack of chips? And, it's one more way to prevent cheaters from late-posting bets on the roulette table.

    As others have already said: casinos are one place where you can expect to be watched no matter where you go or what you do. You already sacrifice some amount of privacy just by entering a casino in the first place.

  21. Re:This actually seems like a good use of RFID by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Well, if you cash out $10K or more at a time...you have to fill out forms for the IRS/US Gov....they really like to track things like that.

    So, say you have a really good night...you cash out $9999, walk out with the rest...cash it out in small doses over time so you stay under the $10K radar. That way, all cash.....hard to track that.

    --
    Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
  22. Ah, the party line: by Mike+Hawk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    File-sharing: Sure there are illegitimate uses for the technology, but there are a few legit uses. DON'T BAN IT.

    RFID: Sure there are a few legit uses for the technology, but there are illegitimate uses. BAN IT!

  23. Re:That's too stupid by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 3, Interesting

    They'll almost certainly assign a unique ID to each chip. So, if you turn in a bunch of chips that all have the same id number, it would be like going into the bank and depositing $1000 in twenties all of which have identical serial numbers.

    If, as you seem to suggest, you compile a list of valid ID numbers, they can still get you because they could store data on where the chip is located. If the computer tells the cashier that half the chips you're turning in are supposed to be in the vault, you're busted.

  24. "Your Rights"? by gkuz · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What rights do you have in a modern casino, exactly, other than the right to have them take your money from you? Cameras everywhere, those "bonus cards" or whatever they're called, plain-clothes security staff everywhere, your every move is watched fourteen different ways.

    I manage to avoid the surveillance problem and keep all my money by the simple expedient of not entering their establishment.

  25. GOOD for them!!! by swordgeek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK, they're using RFID tags in their own property to at the very worst, track your behaviour while on their property.

    They're NOT putting these in items you buy, they're NOT using them to track you out the door, and they DO have a very real need to prevent counterfeits. There's increased security for them, and no invasion of privacy for their customers.

    Where's the problem here? Geez, between this and the "forged colour mars photos," it MUST be a slow news day.

    Oh, wait--both of these were posted by Michael. Interesting...

    --

    "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  26. Whaaaat? (Re:GOOD for them!!!) by phr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What are you talking about, no invasion of privacy? If Wal-Mart wanted to put an RFID tag on your forehead when you go through the entrance, so they could track every item you looked at, would you not feel invaded as long as they took it off when you left?

    And why do you think you'll only be tracked while on the casino property? Most people who go to Vegas stay there for several days, and keep their chips with them when they leave the casino for the night, until it's time to go home. They don't cash out at the end of every session. Most casinos will in fact accept chips from other casinos. You can use Luxor chips at Caesars, and so forth. You can bet that the Caesars will install the equipment to install Luxor's and everyone else's. So you'll be tracked no matter what casino you go in. For that matter, every local restaurant may also install equipment to read the RFID's and they'll track you too.

    Worst of all, the local muggers may also get RFID equipment. Walk past one on the sidewalk on the way to a restaurant with $3000 in chips in your pocket, and the mugger will know the demonination, serial number, and issuing casino of every chip. It makes their target selection a lot more efficient. They could even give you an automatically printed receipt to file with your police report, but somehow I don't think they'll do that.

    Sheesh.

  27. Who'd have thunk it, a legit use by GrouchoMarx · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Casino chips are not something that the casino sells to you. You borrow them as an alternate counting mechanism. Putting RFID tags on THEIR OWN PROPERTY that STAYS THEIR PROPERTY, and STAYS ON THEIR OWN PREMESIS to prevent theft is fine. I'd say the same about museums putting RFIDs on those portable audio players and headphones they give you to walk around exhbits with, or shopping carts at grocery stores. It's theirs, it stays theirs, it stays on premeisis, they have a right to protect themselves against theft.

    That is NOT the case if something is being actually sold to me. Ownership is changing hands at WalMart or wherever you shop, and I don't want something that is becoming MY property to come with auto-tracking mechanisms. If I want an auto-tracking system, I'll damn well install it myself.

    But at a casino, what is being sold is entertainment, not poker chips. The chips are on-premesis loaned use, and so tracking those against theft is perfectly legitimate. Ownership is not changing hands, so RFIDs are not infringing on my property or privacy rights.

    --

    --GrouchoMarx
    Card-carrying member of the EFF, FSF, and ACLU. Are you?

  28. There is a huge difference by RomulusNR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    between RFIDs in something I OWN AND PAID FOR, and RFIDs in something that I AM ONLY BORROWING.

    Now, if casinos sell souvenir (poker) chips... hopefully those wont have active (rfid) chips in them.

    Hell, they should put RFIDs in rental DVD/VHS cases, so they can track down the bastard who hasn't returned that one copy of THX1138.

    Actually, inventory departments of companies might do well to RFID their equipment, especially with a wireless network full of floating laptops...

    --
    Terrorists can attack freedom, but only Congress can destroy it.
  29. Re:I don't understand gambling by happyfrogcow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    casinos and gambling can be entertaining and fun. if you sit down at a blackjack table with $40, a few people you know, and spend three hours there chatting with folks and having fun, thats not entirely bad entertainment even if you lose all $40. if you walk away with all your money you've gotten a few hours of free entertainment. if you're a little lucky and a bit smart you can make some pocket change or coffee money for the week. there's always the possibility you walk away with a few hundred dollars, which ads to the entertainment value.

    always gamble responsibly though. the worst is people who get addicted and gamble away their family's food or rent money.

  30. why play if you can't win? hope it's fun... by rbird76 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You can't count cards, or attempt to use legitimate mean to gain information about cards to improve your bets. The odds for the games are set by the casinos and changed at their will. If you win too much you probably won't be allowed to play. Collecting RFID chip data on bettors in the casino is no worse than anything else the casinos do - it's another step to improve their bottom line at the expense of the people who (legally) are most likely to cost them money. There should be no expectation of fairness at the games in the casion - because there is none. The only sense of fairness is (to modify a Clancy quote) "Fair means I get all my money back, and f*** everything else." If you're going to a casino, you had better have fun, because the likelyhood of getting ahead of the casinos on a consistent basis is probably low.

    RFIDs in this case are reasonable because:

    1) information of the movements of their chips on their property is reasonable -as long as they don't track my movements elsewhere I'm OK with them.

    2) this is similar to data they already acquire and use (it is no worse than other things casinos already do).

    3) the chips have legitimate uses in thwarting people who cheat (by most people's definitions, not just the casinos) - they can stop people from increasing bets late, etc.

    The game is not much more rigged against you than it was before, and your freedoms outside the casinos haven't be eroded by this use of RFIDs in this context.

    I probably should have made this a reply to the topic rather than you in particular, but I agree with your sentiment for the most part. If I had fun at casinos or betting, I might go, but I don't, so there's no point. Playing a rigged game and expecting to get paid is transparently stupid - it's little like going to your local mob boss to be a better criminal. If you're no good, he'll take your money. If you are good, you won't get paid, other than maybe in concrete blocks and small lead weights.

  31. great idea, IMHO by the_greywolf · · Score: 2, Insightful

    in a case like this, this is an excellent use for RFID. protecting your own property by tracking the stuff that's yours using tags that you put in your own stuff is a perfect way to cut down on theft. in a casino, this is especially important. and having an RFID detector when people cash in makes for a good way to make sure the proper amount of money is redeemed.

    i still don't want these things in my jeans.
    --
    grey wolf
    LET FORTRAN DIE!
  32. they've been working on this stuff for years now. by chuckfee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Mikohn Gaming was working on a similar
    concept called safejack (safe blackjack)
    since at least 1998. The idea there
    was that special chips would "announce"
    their value (1,5,25,100, etc.) to a
    computerized table so that the back of house
    systems knew how much was being bet.

    Assuming they have any brains at all, mikohn
    probably filed for a patent on this stuff
    years ago. The gaming equipment industry
    is one big bee's nest of predatory and
    defensive patent plays. (I wish I was the
    guy with the touch-screen gaming machine patent)

    Incidentally, I recall the system also
    had a mini-ccd camera under the shoe so it
    could also "see" the cards being dealt to
    each player.

    Seemed like a pretty interesting idea, but
    I don't think it ever caught on. Maybe it
    was too expensive, or just too far ahead
    of it's time?

    --chuck

  33. It'll make the mugger's lives easier by nickovs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If all the casino chips have microchips inside them then the pick-pockets and muggers along the strip will be able to tell from a distance who has chips in their pockets and be able to home in on them! You can stand by the exit of the casino with a pocket RFID reader and when your PDA lets you know someone just walked by with $10,000 in chips in their pocket you can signal to your heavies down the street!

    --
    If intelligent life is too complex to evolve on its own, who designed God?
  34. Fluffy version of story submission by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I submitted Gambling with RFID a day or so ago, but the accepted one is much better. Oddly enough, the company Chipco International makes no mention of RFID chips on their site. I wonder how unhackable those chips are?

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  35. Tax Implications by Mad+Browser · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This could have interesting implications with the IRS.

    Right now casinos have to report you if you win $1200 or greater on a slot machine, hence the myriad of $1199 jackpots on slots.

    In table games they have no reporting requirement (save the $10,000 casino cage transaction report requirement), mostly due to the complexity of tracking wins vs. losses.

    If technology makes that simple, does that mean I'll now be taxed on my table game winnings? That the casino will be obligated to report them? Yikes.

    --
    RateVegas.com - Vegas Reviews
  36. Finally... by qtp · · Score: 2, Insightful

    a situation where I think RFID is the Right Way To Do It(tm). If the casinos are using RFID to verify that the chips are actually thier chips before payout, and to prevent employees from walking out with stolen chips, then that's thier right and this seems a reasonably innocuous measure.

    I'm sure that there's lots of people who are crying "invasoon of privacy", etc, but this is one situation where you truly decided to play by thier rules when you walked through that door, and keeping track of thier own property is in no way an invasion of thier employees or thier customers privacy.

    --
    Read, L
  37. Indeed.... by raehl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was in Vegas last month for business. I had time to kill before a flight, so I sat at the bar and played video poker. I was up 40, down 10, and ended up even.

    On the game. I also made out with 4 beers.

    Of course, if I had lost $20, it wouldn't have been a big deal - same I would have paid for the beers had I not been gambling.

    Casinos make money off of people who GAMBLE. Those of us who bet the minimum can have a good time on the cheap. After all, even on games that only pay out 95%, if you bet $300/hr, you're still only out $15/hr. And the chicks are hot. ;)

  38. Re:the trick is by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure, but if you can't master this simple count, you probably have no chance at a real count. The hard part isn't counting, it's counting in a loud, action packed place where if you make it obvious you get kicked out. If you take odds at the craps table, you are getting some of the best odds in the house.

    --
    Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  39. Faraday Cage is the answer by mrmeval · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Come on! It's simple to construct a faraday cage to thwart this.

    Now who will be the new up and coming entreprenure who sells 'chip holders' for all those big spenders who want some privacy?

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  40. Cool. More efficiency in mugging by John+Jorsett · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If people are walking around outside with casino chips, all a mugger will have to do is scan them to see which ones are worth the effort of a robbery. No more knocking over some old lady and just getting chump change.