Slashdot Mirror


Lost Doctor Who Episode Found

JSDopefish writes "In an event that most Doctor Who fans thought couldn't happen, another lost episode of Doctor Who has turned up. It's Episode Two of the 1965 William Hartnell serial, 'The Dalek Masterplan.' No word yet as to how it will be released, this news is just breaking today apparently. This is great news for fans, as the last time a lost episode was turned up was in 1999, and most folks had given up hope there were any others left to be discovered. For those who don't know, in the '70s the BBC routinely junked old stories. Not just Dr Who, but all their shows. Repeats and sales weren't an issue then. There's something like 115 or so lost Doctor Who episodes total."

77 of 386 comments (clear)

  1. Not lost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just misplaced in time. They'll show up eventually.

    1. Re:Not lost by Frymaster · · Score: 4, Funny
      1. "lost" in time is what we call "late"
      2. the adjunct to which is the etymology of "tardy" - which is just an old anglo-saxon mispronounciation of "tardis".

      the things you learn at a liberal arts college!

    2. Re:Not lost by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 4, Funny

      2. the adjunct to which is the etymology of "tardy" - which is just an old anglo-saxon mispronounciation of "tardis".

      So that's why everyone in high-school always called me a "tard".

      It's because I showed up late to class!

      I get it now!!!

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    3. Re:Not lost by websaber · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There is inteligent life saving the next generation of media. What is the most used record of early human history? The bible. It was preserved because so many human beings had copies. While countless records were being destroyed by the fire of the great library of alexandria the ones that were saved where the popular plays that were widely distributed. We won't have to worry about losing star trek one day because so many trekkies have almost every copy of every episode. Large portions of old time radio exsist to day because people broke the rules and copied them off the air and donated them after the originals were lost.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  2. collection by mpost4 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They should take all the "lost" ones and put them on a dvd collection.

    1. Re:collection by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "They should take all the "lost" ones and put them on a dvd collection. "

      Do you realize how many episodes of Doctor Who were made? You'd need a police box to store them all!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:collection by mpost4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well they could do it as DVD sets for each season like they do for many of the TV shows that make it to DVD. I have the Star Trek TNG on DVD's and it came in 7 boxes of 7 DVD's each. So why not one set for each year that it was out. and a set for each doctor that they find the Lost shows from.

    3. Re:collection by blincoln · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Dr. Who had 26 seasons.

      That's an awful lot of boxed sets =).

      To be honest, a lot of the earlier ones wouldn't sell enough to justify the manufacturing cost. Space (the Canadian sci-fi channel) showed the early episodes while I was going to school up there and the ratings were abyssmal.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
    4. Re:collection by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You do realise that the US Doctor Who fan club dwarfs it's British, Canadian, Australian, etc counterparts by an order of magnitude?

      There far more extreme hard-core US science fiction nerds who watch Doctor Who than British ones. I doubt their watching re-runs, buying books, videos and DVDs to look "cool". Believe me, as sci-fi goes, Doctor Who is as far from "cool" as you can get. Doctor Who's appeal was never "cool", it was a focus on storylines that deviated from the "Captain kisses alien girl, crewmember in red uniform dies" variety.

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    5. Re:collection by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Informative

      "Old, low-quality B&W TV footage wouldn't take up anywhere near the same space as a modern show shot in color and on (reasonably) high-quality film."

      Actually, old low-quality footage, in many ways, would be worse. Though the imagery would be considerably softer (easier to compress), it'd also be noisier as well. The more noise to the scene, the harder of time the compressor has getting a decent pixel-per-data-rate ratio. They would undoubtedly have to use some modern technology to make the footage useful. Noise reduction, image stabilization, etc.

      I don't you'd get that many more minutes of acceptable quality on the DVD. This is especially true if they're going to go through the effort to restore as much of the footage as possible. Remember, DVDs are supposed to be very clear. They'll try to adhere to that.

      However, I think you'd be absolutely right if we were talking about internet downloads. I wish the BBC would consider taking the early seasons of Dr Who and allowing me to watch them for a modest subscription fee. I would whip out my cc right now to do that. Heck, I might even install RealPlayer!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    6. Re:collection by TomV · · Score: 4, Informative

      26 seasons of, on average, 13 hours each. There's some debate in fandom about the box set approach.

      At present, we get single stories (mostly 4-6 half hour episodes per story) per DVD, with heavy restoration / rework by the BBC's Restoration Team (descratching, cleaning up the soundtrack, a wondrous process called VidFire developed by Peter Finklestone to restore the original smooth 50 fps video look to grainy 25 fps film stock, on The Ark In Space and Dalek Invasion Of Earth, alternative CGI'd versions of some of the grottier FX), plus usually a good hour or so of extras, commentaries, old documentary footage, newly filmed documentaries and so forth.

      It takes a while to make a package that lavish, and I for one would be very disappointed to see the approach change to 'slap it all onto disc as quick as possible for a quick buck'.

      Also bear in mind that only two seasons of Doctor Who were Arc-based (Season 16 'The Key To Time' and Season 23 'Trial Of A Time Lord'). Otherwise it's all standalone stories.

      Though the 12-part "Daleks' Masterplan" and the ten-part "War Games" could be considered Arc-y, they're not complete seasons.

      Only 108 lost episodes to go. It's 5 years since 'The Lion' was found, so we should have the lot back by 2544, just in time for the Dalek-provoked Galactic War against the Draconian Empire ;)

    7. Re:collection by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not on DVD, but a collective called Loose Cannon has been doing 'reconstructions' of the lost episodes using surviving soundtracks and 'telesnaps' (a chap called John Cura was contracted to take stills approx. every 30 seconds throughout the filming in the 60s and 70s and most of these still survive) plus, more recently some computer animation. The idea is that you buy the official BBC VHS of the surviving episodes of your story of choice (to keep it ethical) and then get someone on the Loose Cannon tape tree to dub you up the recon for the missing parts.

      It's a surprisingly satisfying solution. At least, it is if you're an obsessive fan ;)

      Ironically, they only finished up their recon of Daleks' Masterplan last week, so it'll be interesting to see how their take on Ep 2 compares with the original. (Eps 5 and 11 of the 12 were the only ones believed to have survived until yesterday).

    8. Re:collection by TomV · · Score: 2, Informative

      I get that from a 30-year familiarity with Doctor Who.

      For example, Season 1 ran from 23rd November 1963 (An unearthly Child ep 1) to 12th September 1964 ( Reign Of Terror ep 6). The stories that season were:

      An Unearthly Child (4 parts)
      The Daleks (7 parts)
      The Edge of Destruction (2 parts)
      Marco Polo (7 parts)
      The Keys of Marinus (6 parts)
      The Aztecs (4 parts)
      The Sensorites (6 parts)
      The Reign of Terror (6 parts)
      giving a total of 42 half hour episodes.

      Season 2 had 39 episodes.
      Season 3 had 45 episodes.

      By Jon pertwee's time (seasons 7 to 11), things had settled down to a fairly routine 26 episodes per season.

      In Tom Baker's first season (season 12, 28 Dec 1974 to 10 may 1975) this dropped to:

      Robot (4 parts)
      The Ark In Space (4 parts)
      The Sontaran Experiment (2 parts)
      Genesis Of The Daleks (6 parts)
      Revenge of The Cybermen (4 parts)
      giving a total of 20 half-hour episodes.

      Seasons 13 to 17 were stable at 26 episodes, Season 18 had 28 eps.

      By the mid-80's Colin Baker 'hiatus' phase the seasons were getting a lot shorter admittedly. Season 23 (Trial Of a Time Lord) only had 14 episodes. Each of Sylvester McCoy's seasons (seasons 24 - 26) had just 2 4-parters and 2 3-parters, or 14 episodes a season. Hence the average over the 26 year run comes in around the 13-hours per season mark.

      In any case, current trends in 2004 (which incidentally don't seem to match the BBC I watch) aren't all that relevant to a show that ran for 26 years from 1963 to 1989.

      For the new series starting in 2005, Mal Young (Exec Producer and Head of Drama Serials at the BBC) has said there will be around 13 episodes of 45 minutes each. I suspect he may have some clue as to the nature of current trends in Drama Serials at the BBC ;)

    9. Re:collection by CGP314 · · Score: 2, Informative

      You do realise that the US Doctor Who fan club dwarfs it's British, Canadian, Australian, etc counterparts by an order of magnitude?

      Not surprising since the US population is an order of magnitude greater than those places as well.


      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

  3. Get 'em ready! by BTWR · · Score: 4, Funny

    Get your 100 tacos ready!

    (sorry, had to be said...)

    1. Re:Get 'em ready! by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Get your 100 tacos ready!...(Score:2, Funny)"

      Sorry to be a square, but could somebody explain the reference?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Get 'em ready! by DJTodd242 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Simpsons reference.

      http://www.snpp.com/episodes/3F12.html

    3. Re:Get 'em ready! by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Okay, I get the reference now.

      Here I'll digest it for everybody:

      The executor gives them each $100 (except Maggie), and the rest goes
      to Ann Landers, as was stipulated in Hortense's will ...

      Marge: What are you gonna spend your money on, kids?
      Bart: There's a special down at the Tacomat: a hundred tacos for a hundred dollars. I'm gonna get that. ...

      Marge wants the kids to put their money in the bank. When they get there, Bart spots the Tacomat and wishes he could get those hundred
      tacos. The comic book guy comes out with a wheelbarrow full of tacos for the "Dr. Who" marathon.



      I guess all this Deep Space Nine watchin I been doin has overwritten my Simpsons quote database.
      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Get 'em ready! by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Interesting

      " I believe activities like learning another language can impair other skills, or at least while the information is being learned."

      I have anecdotal experience that supports that theory. I used to be real sharp in terms of grammar and spelling until I took the study of Spanish seriously. When my knowledge of Spanish expanded, my grammar and spelling skills suffered. I figure one of two things happened:

      1.) Memory was overwritten.
      2.) In order to easily switch between the two languages, my use of English was simplified.

      Okay, this is way off-topic, but I can imagine that Doctor Who fans would generally find the inner workings of the brain rather interesting. I remember an old Tom Baker episode that... well my memory is a bit fuzzy (overwritten by Spanish?) where the Doc and ... oh... heck I think it was Sara Jane Smith were inside a brain. He made a comment about how the computer equivalent of a human brain would be the size of all of London. Then he went on to say a Time Lord's brain would be significantly larger as it is more complex. Then, he figured out which two neurons to touch together to make the brain do something he needed... Well you gotta admit, he must have one hell of a brain if he knows how to hot-wire a human brain on the neural level, heh.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  5. My kids love these! by darnok · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The really old Dr Who shows are being repeated (possibly in order) on the ABC in Australia. I thought my kids (7 & 5) would only be interested once they got to (a) colour episodes and (b) Tom Baker.

    Boy, was I wrong! These are kids who still don't understand that Dad once had a *black and white* TV, but they love the shows with the first doctor. Even when I was a keen Dr Who fan, I found the first Dr pretty tough to watch, but my kids never miss it.

    I'm still waiting for them to tell me the TV's broken because there's no color...

    1. Re:My kids love these! by kubrick · · Score: 2, Informative

      The really old Dr Who shows are being repeated (possibly in order) on the ABC in Australia.

      They are in order, but they're skipping the storylines for which they don't have all the episodes.

      This does mean things seem to jump occasionally, and you have to resort to the BBC website to work out what was supposed to have happened in between.

      I wonder if they're planning this run to finish up around the time the new Dr Who series broadcasts here, sometime in 2005 or 2006?

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
    2. Re:My kids love these! by cranos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tell me about it, my five year old loves the show but keeps asking me why they don't use the colour version.

      The other things he's discovered is that he can sound like a Dalek if he talks into the fan.

      Ahh the Doctor, its amazing what you can achieve with some string and cardboard, oh and the one Welsh quary that was used for so many different barren worlds.

    3. Re:My kids love these! by kevcol · · Score: 2, Funny

      Was all BBC programming in black & white back then? In the US, most TV shows were in color by 1965. I guess maybe it is due to aftereffects of the war..?

      Oh, yeah, unexploded ordanance kept all those shipments of colour film stock for decades, not to mention rationing.

    4. Re:My kids love these! by TomV · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This is apparently due to the BBC Archives storing the recordings in B&W, even though they were broadcast in colour

      I think you're mixing up two secenarios here. BBC1 went to colour in 1969 (BBC2 went colour in 1967).

      The first Doctor Who to be shot in colour was 'Spearhead From Space', Jon Pertwee's first story, the start of season 7, aired in 1970. Any colour images of Doctor Who from before Spearhead are publicity stills or amateur film footage from behind the scenes.

      Now, there *are* several (originally colour) episodes from the 1970s (bits of 'Ambassadors Of Death' and 'The Mind Of Evil' spring to mind) which now only exist as black and white footage, the original colour videotape having been recycled - maybe this is what you're thinking of?

    5. Re:My kids love these! by Phexro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't believe it was a union requirement, just standard practice at the BBC for ages.

      At least one Tom Baker story ('The Stones Of Blood') was shot with OB (Outdoor Broadcast) video instead of a 'piebald' video/film production.

      I think it had more to do with the director and the budget for the story than anything else. For example, 'The Young Ones,' which was also shot in the early eighties, was shot entirely on video. Doctor Who didn't go all-OB until the 7th Doctor took over in 1987.

      Yes, I am a Doctor Who geek.

  6. Dalek Masterplan by Cosmik · · Score: 4, Funny

    Could the episode appearing just now, out of the blue, be part of their masterplan?

    EXTERMINATION is near!

  7. Dalek's operating system? by Debian+Troll's+Best · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's a question for all those die-hard Dr Who fans out there. Is there a mention in any publications (The Dr. Who Technical Manual, for instance) what software the Dalek's ran? I know at their core they were the shrivelled remains of a Kaled, but all those servo motors, life support systems and weapons had to be running some type of OS. Might it have been Debian? apt-get install davros? Just a thought.

    1. Re:Dalek's operating system? by BasilBrush · · Score: 3, Funny

      Windows 2150 AD.

    2. Re:Dalek's operating system? by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Is there a mention in any publications (The Dr. Who Technical Manual, for instance) what software the Dalek's ran?"

      MacOS. See that plunger on their hand? What else would run such an elegant prosthesis?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Dalek's operating system? by Muggins+the+Mad · · Score: 5, Funny

      > Is there a mention in any publications (The Dr. Who Technical Manual, for instance) what software the Dalek's ran?

      um, DavrOS?

      - Muggins the Mad

    4. Re:Dalek's operating system? by VivianC · · Score: 3, Funny

      Sorry. It was closed source. Davros never liked the GPL. Besides, he didn't want any Thrals getting their hands on the source.

      --
      Viv

      Gmail invites for ip
    5. Re:Dalek's operating system? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      "um, DavrOS?"

      That's a bad pun, but it made me laugh. I just hope nobody makes a TarDOS joke.

    6. Re:Dalek's operating system? by fermion · · Score: 5, Informative
      I think the software was the Kaleds. Like so much old scifi, there was really no concept of electronic circuits capable of branching, loops, and error correction. At best, it was a Babbage machine. More than likely, it was on the level of a mid-20th-century tank, albeit one with lasers. The technological innovation, and basic function, of a Dalek was to provide life support for the mutated life forms. The practical purpose was to provide an attack vehicle. The organics were in complete control of the vehicle.

      The question we can ask is were the Daleks meant to live forever, or was there some facility for biological reproduction of the software. We know the original facility that grew the mutated kaleds and produced the containers was destroyed. Presumable another facility was created, as we know that the original produced could not have produced the numbers that were to later antagonized the universe.

      In summary, this is a really dorky and embarrassing post. My only defense is that I grew up with dr. Who. I will not date myself by indicating how much of my life the series covered. I think we need a poll of our most embarrassing trivia knowledge.

      --
      "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    7. Re:Dalek's operating system? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Funny

      "That's a bad pun, but it made me laugh. I just hope nobody makes a TarDOS joke."

      Time And Relative Disk Operating System? Hmm yeah, I can see why they shortened it to Windows.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Dalek's operating system? by HorrorIsland · · Score: 4, Funny
      Presumable another facility was created, as we know that the original produced could not have produced the numbers that were to later antagonized the universe.

      Okay, I'll embarrass myself here. I had thought of that when the series was airing here, and decided that the kaled mutations must have bred true. I mean, there was no one to build another facility while Davros was out of commission, but the Dalek numbers kept increasing.

      All of this lead me to the mental image of Daleks chasing one another around, screeching "Inseminate! INSEMINATE!"

      There, I said it.

    9. Re:Dalek's operating system? by darkewolf · · Score: 3, Informative

      From memory (and much much geekiness) there were many many more daleks created than were destroyed by 'peter davidson' (i think) in Genesis of the Daleks. Some were sent off-world.

      Also in later stories it was discovered the Daleks worked out ways to convert 'humans' into Daleks. This resulted in two 'races' of daleks, one lot who were loyal to Davros (the Emperor darlek) and the other lot that were humanized and somewhat insane.

      Also, I understand they have lifesupport built in that lets them live indefinately until some twit blows them up with Nitro-9.

      Yes, I have watched far too much Dr Who in my life.

      --
      "That is not dead which can eternal lie...."
      Nimheil
    10. Re:Dalek's operating system? by siliconbunny · · Score: 4, Funny
      No, it was Linux ...

      ... owned by SCO even back then ...

      ... which is why they were called Darleks

    11. Re:Dalek's operating system? by obeythefist · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, what happened was the Dr at some point froze up old Davros in suspended animation as a kind of imprisonment. The Daleks at the time were commanded by the Emperor Dalek, successor of the Supreme Dalek (not a pizza).

      Now, the Daleks were at war with the Movellans, a race of very humanoid androids. Since both the Movellans and the Daleks were entirely logical creatures, they were at a stalemate. The Daleks then went in search of Davros, their creator, because they knew he was illogical and therefore could break the stalemate and allow them to win.

      Davros, being the ultimate evil genius mad scientist that he is, really knows his stuff so he managed to "hack" the Daleks sent to get him, so he could set himself back up as leader of the Daleks. The Emperor didn't like this. Davros grew himself a new bunch of Daleks, and set himself up as the new Supreme Dalek, as the civil war raged on.

      --
      I am government man, come from the government. The government has sent me. -- G.I.R.
    12. Re:Dalek's operating system? by bob_jordan · · Score: 2, Funny

      Maybe they use Macs as well. I guess with one big plunger, they would want a computer that only has one big mouse button.

      Bob.

    13. Re:Dalek's operating system? by Greyfox · · Score: 2, Funny
      In summary, this is a really dorky and embarrassing post. My only defense is that I grew up with dr. Who. I will not date myself...

      Neither will anyone else :-P

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  8. video tape was expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    they used to record over stuff all of the time.

  9. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  10. Won't Happen Again by lukior · · Score: 3, Interesting

    In this new digital age where lots of people collect every episode of their favorite TV shows we won't have to worry about this again. Long live P2P.

    --
    I would like to salute the ashes of american flags, and all the fallen leaves filling up shopping bags.
    1. Re:Won't Happen Again by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "In this new digital age where lots of people collect every episode of their favorite TV shows we won't have to worry about this again. Long live P2P."

      MST3k is living on this way. Since the Comedy Central episodes aren't being re-aired, and few of them are making it to DVD, people have taken it upon themselves to digitize whatever episodes they can get ahold of and put them on P2P. The project is called the MST3K "Digital Archive Project".

      If anybody ever needed a reason to use a home-brew PC as a PVR as opposed to a TiVo, this is it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  11. Re:175 4 7r1ck... g37 4n 4x!!!1 by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "You do realize that they just witheld this episode so that the demand for new material would go up"

    Seeing as how reruns didn't really exist when Hartnell was the Doctor, no I didn't realize that.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  12. Faster than Light Travel by zambuka · · Score: 3, Funny

    is what we need to recover a the old episodes. Just zip out 30 to 40 light years record the old broadcasts and then bring it all back.

    that or build a time machine.

  13. Doctor Who by darkpixel2k · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know I'm a young, but Doctor Who?

    ;)

    --
    There's no place like ::1 (I've completed my transition to IPv6)
  14. What was worse than losing a few episodes... by Timbotronic · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Was when they lost the ability to write good plots. As far as I'm concerned, the "golden age" of Dr Who was the Tom Baker era. "Seeds of Doom" and "Genesis of the Daleks" were absolute classics - every show ended on a cliffhanger, the stories were original and supporting characters were well developed.

    Things started going badly south during the Colin Baker era and the Sylvester McCoy episodes were just awful. What a shame that just as they finally had the ability to create decent special effects the writing fell apart.

    --

    One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

    1. Re:What was worse than losing a few episodes... by Drantin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      just as they finally had the ability to create decent special effects the writing fell apart.

      This may not have been a coincidence!

      <--To Be Continued-->

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    2. Re:What was worse than losing a few episodes... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Things started going badly south during the Colin Baker era and the Sylvester McCoy episodes were just awful. What a shame that just as they finally had the ability to create decent special effects the writing fell apart.

      One of my cousins used to do the special effects for Dr Who. He did K9 and wrote some of the scripts. He even spent some years trying to get another series off the ground after Terry Nation died

      In their time they were not that bad. If you compare them to the Star Trek 'effects' of the same vintage there is no comparison, the BBC effects were low budget but they were much more imaginative. Star Trek's idea of originality was a new pattern of ridges on a new kind of alien's forehead.

      Of course over in the UK we teach this thing called evolution in the schools so there is kind of an assumption that aliens are likely to be completely different.

      The other thing is that the BBC still does a lot with radio, we are quite used to seeing stuff that leaves much to the imagination.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:What was worse than losing a few episodes... by Timbotronic · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The other thing is that the BBC still does a lot with radio...

      Which is why it was so disappointing when they lost the ability to write cliffhanger endings. That's been a staple of radio series writing.

      --

      One of these days I'm moving to Theory - everything works there

  15. Re:I've always... by DJTodd242 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Man, I'm gonna have a field day with this thread.

    http://nitro9.earth.uni.edu/doctor/lost/lost.htm l

    Essentially, after the episodes were initially transmitted they were stored in a warehouse. As the early 70s approached the re-saleability of old black and white shows was decided to be essentially nil. So, the tapes and films were scheduled to be destroyed. Old cellulose is a bit of a fire hazard.

    Many old shows like Z-Cars and Softly, Softly were destroyed as well.

    They're being recovered VERY slowly these days, as all of the foreign stations that episodes were sold to have been searched, etc. The above URL explains a lot.

  16. Whee! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our rediscovered Dalek overlords.

  17. Re:175 4 7r1ck... g37 4n 4x!!!1 by MrLint · · Score: 3, Funny

    clearly time travel will never exit because someone would go back in time and beat to death the bbc ppl who trashed all the old dr who episodes.

  18. Re:yeah yeah by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you were channel surfing at all, let alone with a remote control, you are too young to remember Doctor Who.

    --
    NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  19. Episode luck by British · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm just feeling lucky that ALL(yes ALL) of the Tomb of the Cybermen episodes were restored. It seemed like the best story that was lost forever.

    With the Dalek Master plan, there's only 9 more episodes to go before that's recovered. 5 and 10 are intact, but aren't very interesting since you're only getting a fraction of the story.

    As for "The Moonbase", it was a horrible story. The special effects were very 1950s-esque right down to the Cybermen's saucer that looked like a dinner plate. Nowhere near as cool as the Invasion, where most of the episodes of that are intact.

    C'mon people, start searching your basements for more DW episodes.

    1. Re:Episode luck by RyatNrrd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Tomb of the Cybermen was good...

      but imho Evil of the Daleks would be better! The couple of episodes that are still around are great - they're worth sitting through the Dalek Documentary videa for.

  20. Terry Nation was the culprit, I think by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I may have the name wrong. I am talking about the director or producer who took over for the last year of Tom Baker. As far as I'm concerned, he ruined the show. Up til then, it was fun, it did not take itself too seriously, it just did a good job with a piss poor budget, and that was fine. I remember one comment in particular that summed up his regime, that up until he took charge, Tom Baker had used little or no makeup, but he insisted on full makeup. Why mess with success? he got more budget for special effects, but that was a losing proposition. Dr. Who was famous for cheesy special effects, and that was one of the ingredients of its success. When he boosted the budget, suddenly it was competing in a different league. He also brought in lots of gloomy deep thinking kind of scripts, lots of heavy pondering, without the slightest bit of humor.

    I blame him for the show falling down. If it had stayed low budget and cheesy, it could have kept going for a long time. Once it got expensive, it had to have sterling ratings to match. It also ceased to be any kind of show for kids.

  21. Maybe not much use though. by sbaker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The touble is that Dr Who was a serial. Finding one lost episode doesn't really help much if the other half dozen that surrounds it are also missing.

    Of course if there was a serial with just one missing show - then this should be grounds for much rejoicing and the stamping of large quantities of overpriced DVD's. But with all those early episodes being missing, the odds are not good.

    My mother tells me that I used to have to watch Dr Who from the safety of a large cardboard box T.A.R.D.I.S down behind the sofa so I could hide when the scarey bits came on. (That would have been the Hartnell episodes - not the later stuff - which was much more tongue in cheek)

    --
    www.sjbaker.org
  22. Oh no.. by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Funny

    Another evening of dodgy old b/w film on the BBC soon folks..

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  23. guess they learned something from Tupac... by sTalking_Goat · · Score: 2, Funny

    ust keep finding them lost epiusodes every couple months...

    --

    My days of not taking you seriously are certainly coming to a middle...

  24. Re:Wow, "lost" episodes? by bucky0 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Depending on how long ago it was, there might not have been VCRs around.

    --

    -Bucky
  25. Is this really a very good story anyhow? by alien_blueprint · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This story was published in novelisation form around 1989, in two parts due to the length of the original story (12 episodes). This was basically done via scripts and the author's memory of the show, and no doubt a fair bit of research.

    Anyway, based on the hype surrounding this supposed great epic lost story, I bought and read the two books that year as soon as possible. And it really isn't very good. An extremely thin plot padded by endless chapters of the Daleks chasing the Doctor through time and space, which had already been done by "The Chase" in the show the year before - and "The Chase" *itself* was mostly padding.

    Honestly, the entire thing could be told in 2 or 3 episodes, and it still wouldn't be much to write home about. It's full of holes and is ultimately just lame.

    It's nice that this was recovered for historical and completeness reasons I guess, but the article is trying to hype this story up as a lost classic and it just isn't. It's filler to reach the episode count for the season, using the ever-popular Daleks, pure and simple. There are some really good Doctor Who stories, and some are missing, but this isn't one of them in my opinion.

    As for describing it as "an all-round masterpiece" ... that's just garbage. "The direction of Douglas Camfield combined with the scripting of Terry Nation and Dennis Spooner gelled in... a way that defied description," - now *that* I can agree with ;)

  26. Re:I've always... by aberkvam · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is an updated version of that article available at http://www.geocities.com/TelevisionCity/Lot/8256/l andf.htm.

  27. Eliminating DVD artifacts by LPetrazickis · · Score: 2, Funny

    (and I say that as someone who finds even modern Hollywood blockbusters distractingly artifact-ridden on most DVD releases)

    I think you need a smaller tv set.;)

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  28. YES! by dalek_killer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think that I have died and gone to Sci-Fi heaven. Isn't time travel wonderfull.

  29. Wow I am shocked and amazed by Orion+Blastar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    that Doctor Who does not have its own Slashdot topic. What is up with that? :)

    26 seasons, wow, Tom Baker is my favorite Dr. Who actor. Favorite line "Harry Suluvan is an imbecile!" from when Harry tried to remove a bomb from Dr. Who's body that was rigged to explode if tampered with. :)

    --
    Remember, Slashdot does not have a -1 disagree moderation, and no, troll, flamebait, and overrated are not substitutes.
  30. Correction by Lelon · · Score: 2, Informative

    The BBC did not "junk" its episodes. It archived them very poorly, and a single wharehouse fire wiped out most of the missing 1st and 2nd Doctor episodes.

    1. Re:Correction by TomV · · Score: 2, Informative

      This claim is not Informative. It is, rather, nonsense. An account which actually contains some truth and factual content is available from the BBC's Restoration Team who do the rework on the older material to make it fit for VHS and DVD release.

  31. Doctor Who missing episodes by BigBadBus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So, we're now down to 108 missing episodes (in 1982, it was 136)... For more info, look here and here. For some info on lost UK TV in general, have a look at this page.

  32. Re:Wow, "lost" episodes? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    All of these 115 lost episodes were from the 1960s, before the advent of VCRs. It's possible someone could have hooked up an old fashioned camera and recorded the broadcasts manuaully, but it's not like this was something very many people bothered to do.

    Although, interestingly, a number of people did do the best they could at the time. Specifically, they set up audio equipment to record to soundtrack to these episodes, and these sound-only recordings have survived to the present. The BBC, having obtained these soundtracks from the fans who recorded them, has been releasing them, with linking narration, on CD for several years now. Also, a mini-fan industry (not for profit, of course) has sprung up to "reconstruct" the episodes using these soundtracks and surviving clips and still images to give a (very) rough estimate of the original: a sort of semi-animated storybook format.

    Interestingly, these fan-recorded audios tend to be of generally high quality, so much so that the so-called Reconstruction Team (the internal BBC group responsible for remastering and touching up these old DW broadcasts for video release) has occassionally used them to redub official BBC copies of extant episodes.

    There are dozens of articles and books written on this sad chapter in the BBC's archival history, none of which shine well on them. Apparently, it was a classic case of miscommunication between branches of the company: the warehouses responsible for the wiping of most of these episodes simply assumed that some other branch of the BBC was archiving them, and never bothered to check and find out that no such branch actually existed. Go figure.

    --
    Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."
  33. Mod parent *down* by e6003 · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're completely wrong. Actors' union contracts at the time the episodes were made specified only one repeat max, and that within 5 years of first broadcast. Also Dr Who was videotaped and later recorded onto film (what the US refers to as "kinescope" recordings) for overseas sale. The main BBC library only had a mandate to keep filmed shows until the late 1970s, and the film recordings mostly stayed with BBC Enterprises (the comercial arm of the BBC). When Enterprises needed space they junked a load of their films, thinking the BBC Film Library had them safe and that these were only their sales prints. Unfortunately, they were wrong...

  34. Link to Doctor Who Restoration Team by malf-uk · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here

    Doesn't mention this recent news, but is rather interesting as it explains what they do with such old recordings.

    --
    R Tape loading error, 0:1
  35. Besides, we KNOW HOW IT ENDS! by devphil · · Score: 2, Insightful


    One of the things that's always fascinated me about the Dalek future history is that we've already seen the final episode. We know what happens, some umpteen hundreds of thousands of years from now. All of the Pertwee, Baker (funny), Davidson, Baker (annoying), McCoy episodes are just filling in the gaps between now and then.

    So, I don't know what operating system they're running (PepperShakerOS?), but whatever it is, there's a human emotions loadable module for it. And Troughton's Doctor saw what happened after they tried to "insmod human_emotions".

    In summary, this is a really dorky and embarrassing post. My only defense is that I grew up with dr. Who. I will not date myself by indicating how much of my life the series covered.

    Likewise. I even managed to double-dork myself with the lame insmod joke.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  36. found clips from missing episodes by bstil · · Score: 3, Informative

    "the last time a lost episode was turned up was in 1999"
    Several short clips from lost episodes have turned up as recently as 2003.

    The original broadcast of Fury from the Deep was censored in New Zealand. Certain scenes (eg, "the weed creature attack" scene) were deemed to be too violent or explicit. Ironically for the censors, these censored clips are now all that is left of some episodes.

    A selection of scenes from episode six of the 'lost' Troughton tale Fury from the Deep have been found.
    link

    THE DOCTOR WHO CLIPS LIST by Steve Phillips
    link

  37. Re:Wow, "lost" episodes? by Wildfire+Darkstar · · Score: 2, Informative

    You're both right and wrong. I was incorrect when I stated that 115 episodes were missing, but the number of lost episodes is still in the triple digits. The recovery of this one brought the number down to 108.

    The thing is, many early episodes have been recovered. The bulk (though not all) of the first two seasons were returned in the early 1980s, and throughout the 1980s and early 1990s, numerous episodes were discovered in the possession of private collectors, or other television stations, and so on. But after the recovery of all four episodes of The Tomb of the Cybermen in the early 1990s, the speed at which episodes were being returned slowed to a trickle, as most of the obvious channels had been exhausted. The only significant finds in the past couple of years have been an episode of The Crusade five years ago, and now this episode of Daleks' Master Plan.

    The thing is, this was all perfectly normal. Every episode of the show (and, indeed, of most BBC programs at the time) were shot on video cassette. Because of the PAL formatting of the tapes, though, these masters were then transferred to film and handed over to another division of the BBC, BBC Enterprises, so that they could be more easily sold to foreign distributors. This was all well and good, except that BBC TV had a relatively small facility for storing tape masters, and routinely had to cycle out older tapes to make room for newer rooms, a process which accelerated in the early 1970s, when most BBC1 shows started switching from black and white to color broadcasts. When Doctor Who made the switch at the start of the 1970 season, BBC TV figured it would be highly unlikely that they would ever rebroadcast the old B&W episodes, and so basically junked the lot of them. With almost no exception, every single video cassette master of every episode of the show produced from its creation in 1963 through 1969 was erased. It was figured that if anyone wanted a copy of these episodes, they could go bug BBC Enterprises for the film transfers.

    This left the film transfers being held for oversea sale. The problem here was that the nature of copyright law made it extremely difficult to sort out the rights issue after a couple of years. After this initial period had expired, it wasn't economically practical for BBC Enterprises to store all of the film, and so they were incinerated. BBC Enterprises, for its part, assumed that if anyone wanted copies of the episodes that badly, they could go bug BBC TV for the tape masters because, after all, they created them. This was, in general, a slower process than the video erasing, and took place throughout the 1970s.

    There were a few exceptions here, though. BBC TV held onto a more or less random assortment of episodes as examples of BBC work of the time period, so some of these have survived. And, towards the tail end of BBC Enterprises's pyro-spree a number of individuals within the BBC finally figured out what was going on, as fan groups began to ask around at the BBC for copies of early episodes, and managed to put at stop to the practice. After 1978, a new BBC group, the Film and Videotape Library, was created to provide storage for BBC programs so that this sorry experience (which had affected a lot more than just DW episodes) would not be repeated. From abroad, distributors who had purchased episodes from BBC Enterprises had occassionally stored them, and obligingly returned to them to a very humbled BBC in the 1980s.

    But this is all incomplete. Not every episode was sold to every foreign distributor, and not every foreign distributor kept every episode they had purchased. So, aside from the few private acquisitions squirelled away from the BBC by collectors, the only real remains of these lost episodes are the audio recordings made (illegally, no less) by fans back in the 1960s, a few short video snippets made on extremely primitive equipment, and the work of a photojournalist named John Cura who had been hired by BBC TV to snap a photographic record of the prod

    --
    Sean Daugherty "I have walked in Eternity -- and Eternity weeps."