Slashdot Mirror


A New HOPE on the Horizon

double-oh three writes "It's an even numbered year, and that means that 2600 is holding the party again this summer. The 5th HOPE conference has been announced and scheduled for July 9th to 11th(a Friday-Sunday weekend), again at the Hotel Pennsylvania in New York. This year's 'theme' for the conference is Propaganda, and if this is anything like H2k2, it'll be by the phone companies. And for those of you who are clueless, here's a roundup of the last HOPE con."

139 comments

  1. 2600 and BART by Loconut1389 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My favorite thing about 2600 was their use of bart system, put in bart ticket, meet in the station underground, go back home, and go out the same terminal you came in, pay no fare total because you "travelled no distance". I thought that was slick.

    1. Re:2600 and BART by PatrickThomson · · Score: 2, Funny

      My favourite things about the 2600 were those rad game cartridges and cool joysticks.

      --
      I am one of many. My idea is not unique, nor do I expect my voice alone to sway you. I speak in a chorus of opinion.
    2. Re:2600 and BART by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      I wonder if you can make free phone calls with an atari?

    3. Re:2600 and BART by anomalous+cohort · · Score: 2, Informative

      That must have been a long time ago. I started using the Bay Area Rapid Transit system in 1996. At that time, if you exited from the same station that you entered, your ticket got about $1.25 deducted from it.

    4. Re:2600 and BART by trentblase · · Score: 1

      I think they now charge you the $4.40 excursion fare. You get to ride around the bay area for three hours as long as you enter and exit the same station. Whoop-dee-fricking-doo.

    5. Re:2600 and BART by Charles+Dart · · Score: 2, Funny

      Sorry, you and 2600 are wrong about BART tickets. I once tried this and guess what? If you go in and out the same station you must pay an "excursion fare" at the time 4 dollars. The ticket lady said it was for people who might want to sightsee (because west Oakland is sooo beautifull).

    6. Re:2600 and BART by Loconut1389 · · Score: 1

      In reply to you and the fellow above, this was indeed a long time ago, perhaps 10 years?

    7. Re:2600 and BART by Charles+Dart · · Score: 1

      That particular incident happened in 1997.

  2. I'll be there. by gregarican · · Score: 1

    Count me in. I'll be bringing Circus Atari and Night Driver. Just can't find those damn paddle controllers.

    1. Re:I'll be there. by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Get some here (even though you were joking)

  3. Watch out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    These sorts of things are illegal under the current anti-terrorism laws.

    1. Re:Watch out! by dubiousmike · · Score: 3, Interesting

      While it might not be illegal, you would be foolish to think that you wouldn't be put on a "list" for attending.

      Now would this list make you less likely to get a higher level govt job? Would it get you a different color for the homeland's flight database? Will it not allow you to attend the next presidential visit in your area? Will it get you a phone/internet tap?

      Who can say for sure, but it is a lot more likely than if you didn't go.

      I am not encouraging people NOT to attend. It IS your right to go. But don't think they aren't taking a laundry list of those attending/facial records, ect.

      I am not usually a conspiracy theorist, but its shocking to see the parent modded up as funny and not interesting.

  4. New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by Wacky_Wookie · · Score: 4, Funny

    How long do you think it will take the Dept. of Home Land Insecurity to declare HOPE a gathering of terrorists?

    1) 2-4 Hours

    2) 24-48 Hours

    3) 1 Week

    4) Sometime before the USA lands on Mars

    5) As soon as Dubya has his mourning coffee

    6) Time is a man made concept you insensitive clod!

    1. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe inadvertant bioterrorism

    2. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

      As soon as they find out that someone is speaking about rot13, the FBI will plan to arrive just as soon as they have finished their donuts.

      --
      This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    3. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      As soon as Dubya has his mourning coffee

      I knew the British added unnecessary u's to words, but that is overkill.

    4. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by Orion442 · · Score: 1

      Never. Unless W somehow hears about it and shows up with his Star Raiders gamepad.

    5. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by kinnell · · Score: 2, Funny

      You'd be mourning too if you were being drunk by Dubya

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    6. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by workindev · · Score: 1

      5) As soon as Dubya has his mourning coffee

      So, is this coffee that he only drinks when he is really sad?

    7. Re:New Slashdot Poll: The 2600 Terrorists by EvanTaylor · · Score: 1

      Nah, theyll have the local police arrive and make the arrests then come hours later just in time for the news casters to get a shot of the FBI having these people in custody.

      --
      Sleep is for the weak.
  5. A New Hope? by Ubergrendle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I was 99% sure this was going to be a Star Wars thread...

    --
    John Maynard Keynes: "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do?"
    1. Re:A New Hope? by MountainMan101 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I felt a disturbance in the force... ...as though a thousand hackers cried out "Show us your tits" and then went silent.

      (If you don't get it read the 1st post on the H2K2 Slashdot article)

    2. Re:A New Hope? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 1

      I was hoping it was the one where Han shoots first.

      --
      When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
    3. Re:A New Hope? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You know, the only reason I read this thread was to see how far down I would have to scroll to see my first Star Wars reference.

      Thank you for restoring my confidence in ./ =)

  6. Propaganda OOP programmers by Nadsat · · Score: 2, Funny

    There is an abstract class called Terrorism(Object o). 2600 points out that with propaganda all marginals are passed into the Abstract. It is the job of the Hope conference to instill Honor in all the OOP spin doctors in the world: Beware of Reckless OOP. There goal of a good hacker is to overload Terrorism(Object o) with something a bit more easy rider, while still properly passing deadly free radicals, with something a little more easy rider like Freedom(Object o). Are you with me on this????

  7. Re:Just remember... by gregarican · · Score: 1

    What the hell is ReadHat? Sounds like some flunky on from the "The Electric Company" kid's show.

  8. There's HOPE? by trezor · · Score: 1

    And I thought that we were all screwed.

    Look for your friends, but don't trust to hope. It has forsaken these lands.

    --
    Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  9. Re:Hackers suck. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Beer-stained straight-edges? I think you're confused. Confused and angry, and a little bit pathetic.

  10. HOPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    HOPE is little more than a get together for criminals. For those who don't know, HOPE stands for Hackers on Planet Earth. Thats right, folks, hackers.

    I'm getting really tired of this "wink and a nod" attitude towards hackers. They are dangerous scofflaws.

    Any how, I hope the feds will be in attendance and taking notes on who shows up at this "conference".

  11. Social Engineering Panel by dr_dank · · Score: 4, Interesting

    By far, the biggest draw of the HOPE conventions over the years is the Social Engineering panel.

    Just watching illustrating what Mitnick wrote about in Art of Deception displayed before a live audience is well worth the price of admission.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    1. Re:Social Engineering Panel by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      > By far, the biggest draw of the HOPE conventions over the years is the Social Engineering panel.

      Bah! That was easily outstripped by the Antisocial Engineering panel.

      "Does anyone have any questions?"

      "Yes. I'd like to kno..."

      "Fuck you, tubby! NEXT!"

  12. make it stop by gruntled · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Public displays of "hacker" culture have been overwhelmed by script kiddies, wannabees, media morons (disclaimer: I worked in the biz myself for 20 years) and intelligence/law enforcement types. DEFCON has become a joke; 2600 is even worse, catering to the average alienated junior high school student who still thinks anarchy rocks. Nearly all real analysis and argument take place on line these days.

    1. Re:make it stop by iantri · · Score: 1
      DEFCON has become a joke; 2600 is even worse, catering to the average alienated junior high school student who still thinks anarchy rocks.

      Hasn't this bene what 'hacker gatherings' (whether through BBSes or physical conventions) always been?

      'k3wl' 12 y3aR oLd kiDZ?

    2. Re:make it stop by Sam+Nitzberg · · Score: 1
      There is something very simple you can do if you aren't impressed with the quality of the HOPE conferences...



      Come up with a worthwhile topic, put together a panel, formally submit it, and do the best job that you can to present it.



      I've spoken in the HOPE conferences, and so have a number of people in the industry with some worthwhile things to say... Wynn Schwartau... Greg Newby, many others, and some well known "hackers."

      There are other people - even if you don't agree with everything that they will say - with interesting and diverse views on society and technology.

      If you don't like some of the panels, that provides a great time to go out and see some of New York. One thing that I like, besides the formally established panels, is that they also have (and presume they will for this upcoming conference), set up a sign-up panel - a room where anyone can write-in and take a time slot, and present on their chosen topic. If you don't have time to formally organize a panel, or have a one-man presentation, this can be a viable option.


      Anyway, I like the HOPE conferences, and a big part of what you get out of it can be what you put into it



      By the way, referring to an earlier post, I have had friends in government circles attend the "Hacker" conferences - none have ever had a problem from the government. On the other hand, the kind of attention you draw, and it's nature will largely be based on what you say and do. Is it possible to draw negative attention from the government at one of these? I'm sure it is. People have done some dumb things at some conferences (stealing items or committing other illegal acts). Don't do anything illegal, and there really shouldn't be any problem.

      Sam
      http://www.iamsam.com

    3. Re:make it stop by gruntled · · Score: 1

      No offense intended. I am, however, far more likely to present at academic-type conferences than HOPE.

  13. I hate it. by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    It mean that several friends of mine working for the FBI have to do extended service and our pub evening is chancelled again.

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  14. Such a nice tribute by Effofx · · Score: 1

    ...to name the group was after Bob.

    --
    - Gentlemen, start your hybrids!
  15. Have fun, kids by Otter · · Score: 4, Insightful
    And for those of you who are clueless, here's a roundup of the last HOPE con.

    And for those of you who are over 14, it's time to start applying your meager skills towards doing something useful with your life instead of writing "manifestos" denouncing the phone companies for stifling your creativity and fawning over some relic who exploited a default root password in 1986.

    1. Re:Have fun, kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And for those of you who are over 14, it's time to start applying your meager skills towards doing something useful with your life instead of writing "manifestos" denouncing the phone companies for stifling your creativity and fawning over some relic who exploited a default root password in 1986."

      That's modded +5 insightful??? Must be a strong anti-2600 contingent on slashdot.

    2. Re:Have fun, kids by br00tus · · Score: 1

      Except over the past three years, the employers of IT workers have been laying off and cutting wages left and right. IT unemployment over the past three years compared to the previous three years have been quite high. The owners of the means of production have blocked many people from "applying their skills" with their permission in order to try to generate profit for those owners. What avenue of pursuit would you suggest to those who just graduated with a computer science degree, when companies are not hiring?

  16. Before that.... SCO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Before this happens, SCO will set up a booth to collect the $699 payment required for entry (thanks to some sap displaying Linux code as part of his presentation)

  17. Re:script kiddies unite! by loserbert · · Score: 1

    I think the raised it to $6

  18. Watching from the Staff by GMontag · · Score: 1

    I was on security at H2K2, was an interesting experience but I did not get to see many panels.

    Word of warning: Jello Biafra is perpetual motion. If he is there this time multiply his scheduled speaking time by 3 or 4 to get an estimate of how long he will talk/yell/rant/etc.

    If I go this time it will be as just a face in the mob and attend the panels.

    Actually, I did have a panel for H2K (Parents of Hackers I think was the title we agreed on) but could not go due to a last min. thing.

    1. Re:Watching from the Staff by Kushy · · Score: 1

      Hey Montag sup man...

      Anyway I worked the last one with Montag and the rest of the goons. The problem with working the con or any con for that matter is you just don't get to catch any of the speakers, that you really want to or go to any events that you really want to. Its nice and all but do you really want to work the con, pay to get in, pay for transport, pay for the hotel and not really see what your intrested in?

      It seems kinda stupid to me. Not sure if I'm gonna work this one this time.

      --
      "The word "genius" isn't applicable in football. A genius is a guy like Norman Einstein," - Joe Theisman
    2. Re:Watching from the Staff by GMontag · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Hey man! How ya been?

      I might be working overseas by the time the con comes along, but if I end up with what they are talking about I will have lots of leave and will plan it around a few of the cons too. If I see you there say hi!

  19. Re:Just remember... by loserbert · · Score: 1

    No way man! It sounds way more like something Lavar Burton came up with on Reading Rainbow.

    "C'mon kids, put on your readhats and lets get started"

    ~Would it save you alot of time if I gave up and just went mad now?~

  20. *they by loserbert · · Score: 1

    I even previewed that and still missed my screw up...

  21. Re:I am sick of this. by t_allardyce · · Score: 1

    Yeah professionals, thats why the security in washington let a guy with bullets in his pocket on a plane to London the other day.

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  22. The left-wing pushed Homeland Sec. Dept by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was the left-wingers (the Democrats) who in fact pushed the Homeland Security department idea before Bush got on board with it.

    Bush only agreed to it once his demands to protect worker rights were met (the Democrats wanted to force Homeland Security workers to join and give money to non-job-related political organizations).

    "And the dept. is no assorting of ultra jerks who put kids into prison who live in their parents basements"

    The whackos are now claiming that the Bush administration is targeting "anyone who criticizes it" and putting them in Gitmo.

    I guess Michael Moore and Howard Dean are really in Camp X-ray right now, and look-alike robots roam American to fool us that they are still free.

  23. Re:I am sick of this. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1, Troll

    oh my. talk about giant flame bait. you want to protect the air space, put freaking military patrol on each and every plane. where are we going to get that type of military patrol? how about the millions of troops that are deployed over seas protecting american "interests". american government has no constitutional right to deploy forces over seas except to protect our borders.

    american government does have a responsibility to protect the rights and freedoms of its citizens. using american forces abroad while they could be deployed here is an absolute abuse of power. infringing on any americans freedoms and rights (privacy inspections boarding plane) is an absolute abuse of power. armed military across the country would protect americans rights and keep the country safe from the jihad.

  24. Jello Biafra by Hoi+Polloi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I had the pleasure of seeing Jello at a performance talk he gave at UMass sometime around the late 80's. It was about the Iraq war V1.0 and the Challenger disaster (covered a lot of ground, eh?). Jello wasn't the debacle that night though, it was the mass of students who couldn't get in to see him due high demand for tickets (first come first served). They pushed so hard on the doors they broke the glass and fell through. The state police took a bunch away and covered the door, then they put speakers outside so the mob could hear Jello also. It was loads of anarchistic fun.

    --
    It is by the juice of the coffee bean that thoughts acquire speed, the teeth acquire stains. The stains become a warning
    1. Re:Jello Biafra by checkitout · · Score: 2

      I had the pleasure of seeing Jello at a performance talk he gave at UMass sometime around the late 80's. It was about the Iraq war V1.0 and the Challenger disaster (covered a lot of ground, eh?).

      The sad part is I saw him perform on a college campus tour in the late 90's and he was discussing those exact same things. I was very disappointed because I had heard him on a "spoken word" tape recorded several years earlier, and yet ... he covered little, if any new ground.

      Not only that, but I also met him in person... coincidentally at H2K... where he cut ahead in line and pissed off a bunch of people who were already waiting to check in to the hotel for several minutes. Suffice it to say, I have lost almost all respect for the man and it makes it difficult to listen to the Dead Kennedy's now.

    2. Re:Jello Biafra by Night+Goat · · Score: 1

      You find it hard to listen to the DKs because Jello cut in line at a hotel? Seriously now, wouldn't you try and do the same thing if you thought you were a VIP? There are A LOT bigger assholes than Jello in the music industry.
      I do agree with you about his speeches being very similar. I had the chance to go see him speak last year, but declined because I'd heard his recent CDs before, so I knew the material. Also, to be honest, it doesn't sound particularly entertaining to hear a guy talk about politics for a few hours. I could watch C-Span for that. Henry Rollins was good though. He was actually really funny.

  25. Re:I am sick of this. by micromoog · · Score: 1

    And what, precisely, has the DoHS done that was worth the millions spent in restructuring? How have they changed anything, besides occasionally shifting the useless "terror alert" from Ernie to Bert and back again?

  26. Re:Shut up, faggot ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Living it up at the Hotel Pennsylvania...

  27. That's nothing Re:Watch out! by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 1

    Warning people ("potential terrorists") that these kinds of things are illegal under the current anti-terrorism laws will get you locked up in Guantanimo ba...

    --

    -WolfWithoutAClause

    "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
  28. Re:Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    no! you've got it all wrong.

    "HOPE. What is it all about... is it good, or is it whack?"

  29. Can't see the page... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

    Imagemap that can't be rendered in Moz 1.3?

    Move along, nothing to see here, not worth the effort.

    --
    Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    1. Re:Can't see the page... by caino59 · · Score: 1

      apparantly, updating your software isn't worth the effort either...

      *cough* 1.6 *cough*

    2. Re:Can't see the page... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Working okay on my 1.4 here...

    3. Re:Can't see the page... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      apparantly, updating your software isn't worth the effort either...

      Some of us are still waiting for IT to upgrade us from Red Hat 6.2. It can't run any Mozilla newer than 1.3.

    4. Re:Can't see the page... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      " Imagemap that can't be rendered in Moz 1.3?
      Move along, nothing to see here, not worth the effort."


      Apparently it doesn't work very well under Linux 0.1 either. Nor does it look quite right with Internet Explorer 2.0 or Netscape 1.0.

      Guess what - when you use old/ancient versions of software, some things are not going to work.

      Moderators: Please don't mod this up, especially not as 'insightful' - it's just common sense.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    5. Re:Can't see the page... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      WTF,

      Moz 1.3 is like less than a year old and you calling it ancient ?

      Since when is this ancient:

      Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030312

      We'll excuse me for sticking with something that works. Not everyone feels the need to upgrade ever time a new point version comes out...

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    6. Re:Can't see the page... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Ooooo, my browser is 9 months old! OMFG how can I live down the embarassment. I should be using Mozilla Firebird 0.7 or better yet a nightly build just so I can be cool at Slashdot!

      BTW, imagemaps are just about as old as the internet and could be rendered in Netscape 2.0, so either there is a bug in Moz 1.3 OR they aren't using standard html. Funny how it works under IE 5, a program that is 3 years old.

      *cough* fuck you *cough*

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    7. Re:Can't see the page... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "We'll excuse me for sticking with something that works."

      As I recall, this thread began with you complaining about it not working, yes?

      All I said was that if it's not working, you should try upgrading it.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    8. Re:Can't see the page... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      Well, it has been my experience that in 99% of the time when a page does not render under Moz, it is usually because the page uses non-standard, poorly written, and/or MS-specific tags, not be cause of a bug in Moz. I guess I was all too subtley pointing out the irony that a so-called "hacker" website can only write a page that can be rendered in IE!

      "All I said was that if it's not working, you should try upgrading it."

      No, you said

      "Apparently it doesn't work very well under Linux 0.1 either. Nor does it look quite right with Internet Explorer 2.0 or Netscape 1.0.

      Guess what - when you use old/ancient versions of software, some things are not going to work.
      "


      You beratted me for having "old" "ancient" software and went on to compare my Moz 1.3 (9 months old) with software, the newest of which is 6 years old.

      And in case you didn't try, it works fine in IE 5.5 (3 years old). And under Moz 1.3 page 12 renders OK, but none of the others. That tells me that the page is written poorly, incorrectly or with IE specific html extensions. And any of those seem bitterly ironic for a counter-culture hacker site, which is likely to be accessed by a great many people using Moz, many of those who may be using Moz 1.3.

      No, I'm not ruling out a bug in Moz 1.3, but that doesn't mean you need to be pissy in your response. Given the qualitly of the code the Moz team generates now, I think it was reasonalbe to think it was the page, not the browser.

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
    9. Re:Can't see the page... by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

      "I guess I was all too subtley pointing out the irony that a so-called "hacker" website can only write a page that can be rendered in IE!"

      Yeah... except that this guy just said that it works fine under 1.4. Workes fine for me with Mozilla 1.5 and Firebird 0.7.

      "You beratted me for having "old" "ancient" software and went on to compare my Moz 1.3 (9 months old) with software, the newest of which is 6 years old."

      No, I berated you for complaining about something not working on a browser that's 3 point versions back from the newest available (about versions back if you count all the x.x.x, alpha, beta, and RCs). Also, the newest version is not six months old, it's three days old (as of the time of this writing). The version before that, 1.5.1, had been released on November 26th. Did you ever bother to look at the Mozilla web site before making that claim?

      "Given the qualitly of the code the Moz team generates now, I think it was reasonalbe to think it was the page, not the browser."

      So you thought it better to publicly dismiss the HOPE conference because if it doesn't work in all versions of Mozilla, it's not worth the time? Could they have used a simpler web page? Sure; but they also could have put the whole thing into a text file hosted on the web server. They chose instead to use something that your (older, as in not one of the newer ones) web browser either doesn't support, or otherwise had a problem rendering. Had you tried a new version of either Mozilla or Firebird before posting, your post probably would never had existed. The original post was tantamount to a Windows 95 user complaining that his new firewire hard drive isn't working, and thus is a pile of junk, without ever having tried it on another computer with a newer or more advanced OS. Yes, Windows 95 is chronologically far older than Mozilla 1.3, but in the Mozilla development world, that 9 months is a vast and hugely significant time period.

      In short, it's time for an upgrade, yes? Try 1.4.1, it works well.

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
    10. Re:Can't see the page... by JohnnyCannuk · · Score: 1

      "No, I berated you for complaining about something not working on a browser that's 3 point versions back from the newest available (about versions back if you count all the x.x.x, alpha, beta, and RCs). Also, the newest version is not six months old, it's three days old (as of the time of this writing). The version before that, 1.5.1, had been released on November 26th. Did you ever bother to look at the Mozilla web site before making that claim?"

      No you called it ancient and proceeded to compare it to a goup of software, the newest of which is about 6 years old - Netscape 2 or 3 I believe was the "newest" software in your list. Moz 1.3, which is only 9 months old or so is not even in he same league with the ones you mentioned.

      I don't care if the newest version is 3 days old. I never claimed the newest Moz was 6 months old. I said the version I used was only 9 months old and therefore NOT ancient and on par with "linux 0.1" or "IE 2.0" as you stated.

      Now I am willing to admit that maybe I should have tried a different version of Moz. It's likely that there is a bug in Moz 1.3 that messes up imagemaps, if you will admit that a peice of software that is only 9 months old, on ANYBODY's timescale, is not old. After all, the last time I checked, the HTML 4.0 standard hasn't changed in the last 9 months. I have had the sorry pleasure of having to create webapps that are "cross-browser" and I almost always find that IE will render garbage HTML code, when Moz (any version) rightly refuses to do so. It almost always means the use of poorly written and/or non-standard HTML.

      Which I thought was funny because at the last HOPE there were seminars on making websites renderable in lynx. LYNX! They want modern sites to be renderable in LYNX but can get it to render in a recent version of Moz, the opensource wet-dream browser.

      Now, I feel like a bit of a putz for not having researched whether this is a bug in Moz 1.3 (since I have never before had a rendering problem in 1.3, why would I assume it was a bug in Moz and not a bug in the page). I wrongly assumed that because it didn't render in Moz 1.3, it wouldn't render in Moz period. Worked fine in IE 5.5 though, a much older browser. I will accept that criticism.

      But let's be honest, do you think that anybody beyond developers are even going to us Moz if 9 months makes a version obsolete? When It doesn't have an auto update or patching feature? Hey, I might do it but my wife sure as hell won't. She'll stick with IE.

      FWIW, I already have upgraded to 1.6...

      --
      Never by hatred has hatred been appeased, only by kindness - the Buddha
  30. Star Wars by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    With episodes 7, 8, and 9 on the way, I need a new hope : (


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

  31. defcon... hope.. defcon... hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder why it is, once again, 2600 has chosen to host hope directly before defcon? not enough months in the year to host a convention without attempting to compete directly? Why is it that 2600 seems to feel the need to compete? They can't even play nice, two defcons ago several 2600 lackeys we're caught distributing flyers with some funny stuff like inturupt a talke and some really messed up stuff like stab a goon, all this under the header, "FUCK DEFCON UP"

    Doesn't matter, if I have to choose, hands down, defcon is the destination, given the attendance numbers at defcon it seems I'm not along.

    A marketing tip mr corley: schedual you're con after people have saved some vacation time back up after defcon, then it wont be just east coast people that go. I'd sure like to check out hope but it's not going to come at the cost of the week I spend in vegas that july...

  32. Re:Hope by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Sorry, that was really bad. I'll do it right next time.

  33. My HOPE experience by gpinzone · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I was working for the New York Transit Authority back when a fellow by the name of Red Balaklava claimed he would reveal "secrets" about the MetroCard system. I got sent as an "undercover agent" along with a few people from the contractor that produced all the MetroCard equipment. It was a big waste of time. Nothing was revealed other than a talk about how doors were designed on token booths and how it's a safety issue. As a matter of fact, he advised people at the conference that trying to hack the system to save a $1.50 (the fare at the time), is a waste of time.

    I had to sit through other equally useless presentations, like how html code needs to be designed so it's compatible in lynx in order for libraries and poor people who can only afford 386 computers can surf the Internet. (I shit you not!) What I learned from the HOPE conference is that most "hackers" (if we can agree these were hackers) are paranoid and generally misinformed about a great many things. The successful ones are those that had access to equipment and inside information. This Red Balaklava guy was a token booth clerk in disguise (our security people recognized him under his ridiculous mask). However, he had no real knowledge of how the system worked other than what he gleaned from the patent office's description and his own speculation...which was inaccurate to say the least.

    1. Re:My HOPE experience by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe he did not know much... anyway ever been to the ccc gatherings in germany? no one there talks about really "interestings" things anymore like they did years ago because people are scared of "spooks" etc. and thus they are extremely superficial with the information they provide...

    2. Re:My HOPE experience by iantri · · Score: 1
      I had to sit through other equally useless presentations, like how html code needs to be designed so it's compatible in lynx in order for libraries and poor people who can only afford 386 computers can surf the Internet. (I shit you not!)

      Well, if you code it right (XHTML + CSS) it will work just fine in Lynx, anyway.

      Besides, hardcore CLI junkies are probably going to use links now, anyway (I do).

    3. Re:My HOPE experience by skintigh2 · · Score: 1

      "I had to sit through other equally useless presentations, like how html code needs to be designed so it's compatible in lynx in order for libraries and poor people who can only afford 386 computers can surf the Internet. (I shit you not!) "

      Not only is that not useless, but if you can view your page with lynx then you know a blind person can navigate it, too, using text-to-speech programs. Depending on where you work, this can be required by LAW.

      I suppose if you don't want disabled and disadvantaged people to view your site, it is useless, but I doubt most people think like you, nor do I believe this idea has even occured to most web designers.

    4. Re:My HOPE experience by gpinzone · · Score: 1

      The "standards" for accessibility does not mean the same thing as "lynx compatible." For example, image alt tags don't help visually impaired folk that use text-to-speech converters. Conversely, tables can contain information that can be useful to visually impaired people, but have no benefits to lynx users.

    5. Re:My HOPE experience by radon28 · · Score: 1

      If Red didn't reveal anything, then why is he now a convicted felon because of what he revealed?

    6. Re:My HOPE experience by demaria · · Score: 1

      That's all fine, but why would you go to a hackers conference to hear an entire panel on web accessibility for the disabled?

  34. Rewrite by CGP314 · · Score: 1

    Rex Banner: Does anyone have any questions?

    Comic Book Guy: Yes. I'd like to kno...

    Rex Banner: Don't crack wise with me tubby

    Comic Book Guy: Tubby? (looks down) Oh yes... Tubby


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

  35. Re:defcon... hope.. defcon... hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dude... skip them both and hit GrammarCon '04 this year. I guarantee they'll have all sorts of stuff you've never *heard* of.

  36. I was at H2K2... by byolinux · · Score: 1

    On the Information Desk, for well.. most of it, I guess... we wound up providing some light entertainment as well, in the end.

    Anyone there, might well remember me as 'The British Guy'

    1. Re:I was at H2K2... by severed · · Score: 1

      Hey, how's it going? I was also on the Information Desk. I was the guy who came down from Montreal with his girlfriend, and who kept on coming up with little ideas to pass the time. We swapped a few e-mails afterwards, and then I sort of lost touch.

      I actually just got back from London, after going to an impromptu 2600 meeting in Amsterdam.

      --

      HaXXXor.com - Naked Chicks Teach You How To Ha

    2. Re:I was at H2K2... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Hey there... I spotted you earlier on another thread and figured it was you. I added you as a friend to remind me to contact you. This isn't really a great place to chat, so drop me email at matt at the domain in my URL link above...

    3. Re:I was at H2K2... by mlc · · Score: 1

      Hi Matt...

    4. Re:I was at H2K2... by byolinux · · Score: 1

      Hey Mike..

  37. Re:script kiddies unite! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    $6?! For nothing but "how to be 1337 like me" stories, and rants? I can get that for free just by chatting in IRC.

  38. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Proud owner of a Mensa membership card

    Judging by your grammar, I deduce that you stole it.

  39. Does anyone actually care? by seems+so+green · · Score: 1, Funny

    I was under the impression 2600 were still talking about how awesome it WAS back in the day.

    1. Re:Does anyone actually care? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even back in the day they were still talking about how awesome it was back in the day. Some things never change.

  40. HEX2005 conference by throwaway18 · · Score: 1
    Planning has begun for HEX2005, the next conference in the HEU, HIP, HAL series. Sunlight, tent networking, friendly people, interesting talks and no marauding kids.

    International visitors currently don't have their fingerprints recorded when entering the Netherlands.

  41. I HOPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    they shored up their webservers, because i'm already not making it past page 5 in the Book of Hope....

  42. Re:I'm a Republican! (A bit of drivel for you) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... and which election would that be? The one in Tanzania? I have news for you, there's going to be elephant meat on the BBQ this November. Look at all the good things that have happened since Bush took office: Enron, 09/11, a 4 year long job drought, Iraq, a massive federal deficit, all the kinds of things that pretty much guarantee re-election especially since the GOP didn't even win the popular vote last time around.

  43. FUDdy duddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It's funny how as we grow old
    We cling to the past as we cling to the air
    and feel nostalgia for things that were
    maybe never there..."

    - The The, "Jealous of Youth"

    "All planet leave is cancelled! I've just had an unhappy love affair, so I don't see why anyone else should have a good time."
    - Prostetnic Vogon Jeltz

    The only thing that's changed is your perspective. Public displays of "hacker" culture have always been overwhelmed by script kiddies, wannabes, media morons and LEOs. DEFCON was always a joke as far as being a real security conference goes, but it's always been a heck of an excuse for a great big geek party. 2600 has never done anything but cater to the average junior high school student who still thinks anarchy rocks. And nearly all real analysis and argument have always taken place in private settings or online.

  44. Re:HOPE by `Sean · · Score: 3, Insightful
    > Any how, I hope the feds will be in attendance and taking notes on who shows up at this "conference".

    I personally hope that many feds are there. At previous HOPE conferences I attended, it was a pleasure to be able to sit down with law enforcement agents from various three-letter-organizations and chat it up with them. They learned from me. I learned from them. And, overall, they're pretty cool guys. Besides, my file is filled with good stuff, so it doesn't really matter to me.

  45. Even numbered year? by `Sean · · Score: 1

    1994? 1997? 2000? 2004?

    I dunno, I thought it was every 3 years, but I guess they're skipping a year...

    1. Re:Even numbered year? by Dan+Morenus · · Score: 1

      You forgot H2K2 (2002).

      --
      -- Conserve binary trees; recycle your email. --
  46. Re:Hackers suck. by pantycrickets · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hacker culture really does suck. A bunch of pasty-faced smelling fat t-shirt wearing beer stained straight edge libertarian or obnoxious green pedophiles come together to explore how many ways they can produce the same buffer overflow and call it brilliance.

    Yeah, DefCon is just like that. A bunch of guys in a conference room.. gang-raping children, tossing beer all about, but not actually drinking it, for moral reasons.. and then having a big circle jerk when they discover new buffer overflows. They might all be dressed up like Adolf Hitler.. just for good measure.

    Seriously.. what the hell are you talking about?

    2600, the pedophile quarterly

  47. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Folks, just remember, the hijackers were neither liberal or atheist. Something to think about.

  48. H2K2 was a bit dull by bahamutirc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to H2K2 and found it to be fairly dull. Some things to point out:

    • Internet connectivity was worse than dialup. We (my brother and I) had to go to Bryant Park and hop on NYC wireless to get online.
    • The panels were dull and uninformative. I actually fell asleep through most of them.
    • You're supposed to mix and meet people, but they had all the tables "reserved" for specific 2600 groups. If you weren't in a 2600 group, then you had to find space in the other room with all the POS machines.
    • There is, of course, an elitist mentality among many of the attendees, which makes conversations about technology a little difficult.

    There were two things that I did enjoy while I was there. One was the lockpicking session: I've never seen someone so good at picking locks before. The other was this hysterical documentary about script kiddies called Owned, which I'd like to have a copy of but can't seem to find anywhere.

    But just being in Manhattan alone is worth the trip. That's one hell of an amazing city.

    1. Re:H2K2 was a bit dull by gbnewby · · Score: 1
      There's a lot of time to get involved in planning this year's HOPE. Start thinking about possible speakers and topics.

      Internet connectivity was worse than dialup.
      The conference had a T1, which was sometimes saturated. I didn't think it was that bad, but your mileage may have varied depending on when and where you connected (and who was trying to flood/DDoS the wireless access point you were using)

      they had all the tables "reserved" for specific 2600 groups
      I think you weren't paying attention or didn't look around. There were *piles* of folding tables and chairs, it was self-service. If you expected someone to set up your table and bring you a menu, you are missing a big part of the hacker ethic.

      There is, of course, an elitist mentality among many of the attendees, which makes conversations about technology a little difficult.
      Well, one thing about hackers: they are *all* types of people. The people I interacted with were there to share & learn, but I'm sure some fit your view, too.

      • Greg (I was the guy in the tux at H2K2)
  49. Dangerous keywords! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think I hear a Carnivore server setting off alarums...expect a visit from the FBI.

    ==========

  50. When I saw the headline by Conspiracy_Of_Doves · · Score: 1

    I thought that Lucas finally said "The hell with it" and had decided to completly reshoot episode IV

  51. I've been - here is what I remember (rambling) by Captain+Rotundo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I went to H2K figureing what the heck, I think its needless to say, but at 22 I was well past the median age at the time :) of attendees at least. And most of the criticism here is valid, a lot of the talks were by people who thought they knew far more than they did, and a lot of the guys are paranoid.

    Around the same time I saw a 2600 panel at ICON (a sci-fi con on LI) and I forget the guys name but one of the little lackies that was on Off The Hook all the time was going on about how they track Metrocards, I got in an arguement with him because I said that it was possible they tracked them so they could get a better idea of traffic flow, not so they would know what a bunch of 16 year old script kiddies were up to (I put it nicer)

    But H2K was around the time of the MPAA v 2600 trial and RMS showed up, and I have to say after watching him speak I haven't used a proprietary OS since (except when working with someone elses computer of course) I am even the only one in my office running GNU/Linux for all my work. I always believed in free software but I found his talk very enjoyable and it was enough to push me over the edge.

    And of course there was the "Freedom Downtime" showing with long delays (nothings more fun than sitting in an over crouded room full of tennage 'hackers' while they can figure out how to project a movie) while the film was amatuerish and basically a large Michael Moore derivation it was none-the-less enjoyable.

    I think the Mitnick by phone (couldn't get permission to leave the state of california at the time) social engineering panel was very good. Eric called Verizon or AT&T to enquire about a memo about hope, and they bought that he was an employee hook line and sinker (till the croud yelled.

    Cult of the Dead cow was retarded, and enlighting because I learned how much I actually completely disagree with a lot of what they stand for when they arent acting like buffoons on stage.

    Jello was entertaining, of course it was a typical left-wing political "they're are fucking us" speech.

    I think the best part was the MPAA v 2600 Mock trial in which I manged to get a good portion of the crowd to boo and hiss at eric when he walked in (in hannabal lecter garb no less). - it was a delightful mix of real lawyer speak, and really fun jabs.

  52. Re:defcon... hope.. defcon... hope... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    yeah well, this was to be expected, I REALLY should avoid trying to write in english after being awake for 24+ hours

    I highly reccomend snotty-nazi-con for you btw :)

  53. I Was At H2K2 by Matty_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    I was in attendance in 2002 at H2K2.

    I didn't attend a ton of panels. I picked out some of the interesting ones, to me, and thought most of them were worth my time.

    I wasn't terribly interested in all the politics, or Jello Biafra. I'd like to see more technical stuff, but I know that politics are part of what 2600 is all about.

    The entertainment was okay. The show put on by Cult of the Dead Cow was very boring. I hope they never do it again. On the other hand, I really liked some of the DJ's who composed all of their own music. Some of it was excellent.

    None-the-less, I plan to return to New York in July and hope this year's HOPE conference is even better than 2002's.

  54. Enron was a Clinton problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ENRON was a Clinton problem, actually. It started and flourished under his administration. It was exposed under the Bush administration, and shut down.

    Yes, you are right that Bush stopping the terrorists in Iraq and elsewhere will help guarantee that he get elected a 2nd time.

    The "a massive federal deficit"? The Democrats keep complaining that Bush is not spending ENOUGH money.

    The Democrats look likely to lose later this year. The Dean message of hatred and lying will turn off the middle entirely. If things stay as they are domestically and internationally, Bush will surely win.

    The alternatives do not make the chances of a Democrat victory look good either: Gephardt's courting of the 10% union workers ends up turning off the 90% who say "union no!". Clark is a joke candidate, much like Perot's Admiral running mate. Kerry, like Dean, is given to lying about everything and comes across as rather mean.

  55. Re:I am sick of this. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "armed military across the country would protect americans rights and keep the country safe from the jihad."

    Someone actually modded this insightful? You've got to be joking. Many of the founding fathers saw a standing military, in and of itself, as a major threat to liberty. Standing armies have historically been used to oppress the population in both times of war and peace. This nation, in an attempt to protect the people from a corrupt regime using the military as a weapon against the people, enacted the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. It restricts the military from engaging in any law enforcement, except where provided for by act of Congress or the US Constitution. This followed the Supreme Court decision of Ex Parte Milligan(1866), which stated that Martial rule (military law) cannot exist or be enforced within the borders of the United States except where it is necessitated by a situation (such as rebellion) in which the courts cease to function, and thus, civilian authority no longer exists. The Supreme Court, like just about everyone else who's ever taken 10 seconds to look at a history book, recognized military forces policing civilians as a grave and dire threat to the liberties guaranteed by our Constitution.

    The threat posed by the military to the liberties of the American people has been recognized since this country was formed. To say that we should now reverse more than 200 years of historically-based common fucking sense is absolutely insane.

    What part of this did someone find "insightful"?

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  56. Note to slashdot editors by lightspawn · · Score: 1

    When you use acronyms in an article that some readers may not be familiar with, take the time to explain them.

    1. Re:Note to slashdot editors by double-oh+three · · Score: 1

      Hackers On Planet Earth, I realized I should have added that the second after I hit the submit button.

      --
      "For years, I struggled with reality... but I'm happy to say I finally won out over it." -- Elwood P. Dowd
  57. "Clueless"?? by bscott · · Score: 1

    Wow, a new definition for "clueless" - someone who's unfamiliar with an acrynym which refers to some hacker meeting. (I don't want to sound pissy lest I get moderated down for being a crank, but hey, you're either extending the "clueless" label to a ridiculously large proportion of the world's population, or you're diluting its effectiveness and impact when applied to genuine idiots... let's not lose this expressive word to overuse like we lost "dork" or "geek"!)

    --
    Perfectly Normal Industries
  58. Re:I am sick of this. by mark_lybarger · · Score: 1

    i can't speak to the mods. they typically get the insightful mod wrong.

    you give a lot of informative statements to back up the laws regarding a standing militia.

    you also mention that the military can be used when "it is necessitated by a situation (such as a rebellion)". i would assume this to include a direct attack on the states. if canada rolls down into the US and launches an attack on the US, on US soil, I assume that military forces have a responsiblity to exist in the area that the attack occurs. and that they will use martial law to attempt to protect the rights of the american (u.s.) citizens.

    why is it that we can spend our money to send troops abroad to police other nations, but we can't keep troops at the borders (that could include air space) to protect our citizens from attack? what is it that gives us the right, responsibility or obligation to send troops abroad to police other parts of the world? is that a responsiblity that was recogonized when this country was formed or something we accquired in the last 80 years? common fucking sense indeed...

  59. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, you mean something like the National Guard?

  60. No HOPE by po8 · · Score: 1

    Amazing. Almost 100 words in the article on HOPE, without once managing to mention that it stands for "Hackers On Planet Earth", or give us "clueless" the slightest idea what it's about (a sort of social-minded hackers' conference with some relation to 2600 Magazine).

    Until I started clicking on slow links, I assumed it stood for "HOtel PEnnsylvania", where it was being held...

    1. Re:No HOPE by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

      Amazing. Almost 100 words in the article on HOPE, without once managing to mention [what] it stands for[], or give us "clueless" the slightest idea what it's about

      Not to mention the "helpful link for the clueless" to ANOTHER article that ALSO doesn't explain it.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  61. And I'm sick to death of this sort of ignorance. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 1

    For those who don't know, HOPE stands for Hackers on Planet Earth. Thats right, folks, hackers.

    I'm getting really tired of this "wink and a nod" attitude towards hackers. They are dangerous scofflaws.


    And I am sick to death of people like you who continually misuse "hacker" to mean "computer criminal".

    A "Hacker" is an exceptionally skilled programmer, who is able to achieve exceptional results and solve difficult problems through the application of his skills, especially in the absense of adequate software tools. (Indeed, most of the tools used by non-hackers to sove mundane problems were writting as hacks by hackers.)

    People who break into systems are "(computer) crackers". (Be sure to include the "computer" when in or near Georgia.)

    People who abscond with other people's data, converting it to other use (either their own or sold for profit) are "(comptuter) pirates".

    People who damage systems for fun are "(computer) vandals", for political reasons are "(comptuer) terrorists" or "(information) warriors".

    Calling a (computer) pirate a "hacker" is exactly the same mistake as calling a cattle ruslter a "cowboy", a truck thief a "trucker", or a sea-pirate a "sailor". Yes, many cattle rustlers are cowboys (though some are not). But most cowboys are NOT cattle rustlers.

    Two sorts of people make this mistake:
    - Those who are largely ignorant of the subject (getting their information from the mainstream/establishment press, politicians, or "security consultants" marketing themselves to upper management.
    - (computer) crackers, vandals, or pirates of limited skill who are trying to puff up their reputations.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  62. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    He must have ment Menso.

  63. Re:I am sick of this. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

    "I assume that military forces have a responsiblity to exist in the area that the attack occurs. and that they will use martial law to attempt to protect the rights of the american (u.s.) citizens."

    The litmus test for legality of martial law was set in Ex Parte Milligan. To quote the Supremes in Milligan:

    "Martial law cannot arise from a threatened invasion. The necessity must be actual and present; the invasion real, such as effectually closes the courts and deposes the civil administration."

    Also:

    "It follows, from what has been said on this subject, that there are occasions when martial rule can be properly applied. If, in foreign invasion or civil war, the courts are actually closed, and it is impossible to administer criminal justice according to law, then, on the theatre of active military operations, where war really prevails, there is a necessity to furnish a substitute for the civil authority, thus overthrown, to preserve the safety of the army and society; and as no power is left but the military, it is allowed to govern by martial rule until the laws can have their free course. As necessity creates the rule, so it limits its duration; for, if this government is continued after the courts are reinstated, it is a gross usurpation of power. Martial rule can never exist where the courts are open, and in the proper and unobstructed exercise of their jurisdiction. It is also confined to the locality of actual war." [Emph Mine]

    "why is it that we can spend our money to send troops abroad to police other nations, but we can't keep troops at the borders (that could include air space) to protect our citizens from attack?"

    Well, for one thing, we face no enemy at any land border. As for the oceans, we have the Coast Guard. Local protection for the border states would be provided by National Guard, police, and other law enforcement. If Canada were to (suicidally) invade Maine, the local smokeys and National Guard would be mobilzed for defense while military resources were gathered. Martial law could not be legally declared in Maine unless the Canadian military ran right over the immediate defenses and overthrew the soverign state authority of Maine. At that point, US military forces could declare the entire battle zone (and probably a small buffer zone surrounding immediate combat areas) to be under martial law. The Commander in Chief (President) would have to make the determination as to whether martial law was necessary.

    In terms of deploying US troops as a deterrant, there's really nothing to stop anyone from having the military sit a bunch of guys all around our borders fully armed. If, however, a couple soldiers watched one civilian beat the hell out of another civilian, they could not arrest anyone, nor do anything other than protect the guy getting his ass kicked and call the police. That being said, there is little that's more demoralizing to a people than to feel as though they're under the control of cold, heartless military forces. Similarly, there is nothing more demoralizing to a military force than to be forced to police its own citizens. Who signs up to the US Army because they want to drive a tank down Main St in Smalltown, USA while pointing an M-16 at the Americans watching them pass? To sum it all up, there's no need to deploy US military forces to our borders, as there's no known threat with which our civilian forces are incapable of dealing.

    "what is it that gives us the right, responsibility or obligation to send troops abroad to police other parts of the world?"

    That depends on who you ask. If you ask an isolationist, nothing. If you ask a neocon, then we have to do it to maintain American power and change the world so it's more US-friendly. Outside of that, there are number of arguments, centered around morality, legality, and humanity. How do we, as a people blessed with success, ignore a suffering people's cries as an unelected military force slau

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  64. Hacker = computer criminal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Except no-one uses this. It is like the trekkies who insist on being called "Trekkers": no one cars.

    Or better, yet, the realtors who insist that "Realtor" only applies to some Realtors, it is a trademark.

    Outside of the geek world, "hacker" means computer crook. "Cracker" means Georgia redneck, and what you are calling a "Cracker" the public calls a computer-nerd or -geek.

  65. Re:I am sick of this. by Loki_1929 · · Score: 1

    " Your liberterian left wing propaganda"

    Actually, Libertarians tend to be more right-wing oriented. They're basically conservatives whose main issue is reducing the size and power of government. Conservatives and Republicans used to talk at length about how smaller government and more individual freedom were good things. The current crop sees government as an instrument to wield power. Sounds a bit like how the left used to be described.

    "Proud owner of a Mensa membership card."

    Thank goodness that membership card didn't require more than basic knowledge of the English language to obtain.

    You're a moron and a troll. In other words, you'll fit right in with the First Post, GNAA, and Goatse.cx '-1' posters.

    --
    -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  66. yeah, mod me off-topic by Paul+d'Aoust · · Score: 1

    am I just a conspiracy theorist, or is there something very weird and significant going on with the number '2600'? I mean, you've got the hacker group, you've got the venerable Atari, and now you've got Windows XP... as soon as I saw that my copy of XP (and almost everyone else's) was build number 2600, I started scratching my head and looking for correlations! (for fun, mind you)

    --
    Standing at the very edge of my imagination, I peered into the inky void and realised -- I couldn't think up a new sig.
  67. Increasing pattern by knarfling · · Score: 1

    At first it was every three years.
    1994
    1997
    2000

    Then it switched to every two years.

    2002
    2004
    2006 *

    Next, it will be every year

    2007*
    2008*
    2009*

    and then twice a year

    spring and fall 2010 *
    spring and fall 2011 *
    spring and fall 2012 *

    Then once a quarter, once a month, twice a month, and so on.

    I expect that by 2020 we should be having these once a day.

    * anticipated future date.

    --
    Great civilizations have lived and died on false theories. Don't mess up mine with a few facts.
  68. Programmers ARE the means of production by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The owners of the means of production have blocked many people from "applying their skills" with their permission in order to try to generate profit for those owners

    This is not socialism, where government owns everything (incuding the means of production) and everyone is slave.

    This is, instead, a situation where a programmer having the "means of production" is as simple as having a $599 Dell box with a CD burner, a stack of free-after-rebate CD's, and a Borland programming language.

  69. Re:I am sick of this. by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 1

    What harm could occur without a gun? Did he threaten to insert the bullets by hand?

  70. Re:HOPE by gbnewby · · Score: 1

    I sent a fax to the feds (there's a cross-agency public relations department I can't remember the name of right now). I mentioned I was a planner for H2K2, and we would LOVE them to show up and give a talk to hackers. I told them it might not be a very friendly audience, but it would be a great opportunity for the feds to present their points of view, and gather feedback.

    I'm still waiting for a response....

  71. Why is 2600 held in such high regard by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am posting this anonymously, because I deal with several, 'high level' members of 2600 on a regular basis. I have found that these members, including Emmanuel Goldstein (aka Eric Corley) are a bunch of self important people, who think their opinion is always correct. I also, have not had one good experience with other members. Again, they refuse to believe they could ever be wrong, and speak in a condescending manner to all those not in the 2600 'clique'. Mod me down if you want, but this is a true synopsis of my experiences with the 2600 'hackers'.

  72. On a similar tangent... by boogahsmalls · · Score: 1

    A whole bunch of us on the left coast [see: Los Angeles] have been working on getting our own convention off the ground. We're calling it LayerOne and it's a bit more for the Slashdot set then it is for the h4x0rs.

    We're currently taking papers until March 14th from any interested parties who would like to speak on a broad range of topics. Anything from copyright issues to social software to VoIP is fair game.

    --
    gomi no sensei :: hav
  73. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What harm can a gun without bullets do?

  74. Re:I am sick of this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It can be used for making a credible threat.