Slashdot Mirror


Are Geeks in Saudi Arabia Just Like Us?

Robin 'Roblimo' Miller (of NewsForge and sometimes Slashdot) spent five days in Saudi Arabia's capital, Riyadh, meeting with local Linux advocates and users, and wrote five articles while he was there. The article titles are Saudi Arabia: Linux advocates in white robes, Saudi Space Institute techies love their new Linux computer, Meet Saudi Arabia's most famous computer expert, Saudi open source conference opens minds, and Linux and open source opportunities in the Mideast. This is the first in-depth look ever at open source (and programming in general) in a conservative Islamic country. Roblimo concludes that under the robes, Saudi geeks are much like geeks everywhere, but from comments on the stories it looks like a lot of people don't agree.

65 of 837 comments (clear)

  1. Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by drinkypoo · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You're a geek if you are passionate about something nerdy, but still have social skills of some sort. ("Geek" has often been defined as someone who is social about computers, but you can be a math geek, physics geek, et cetera.) To me, being a geek implies that you revel in understanding something difficult and you feel the same satisfaction from grokking the deep and apparently unexplainable that other people get from their "normal" pursuits.

    Perhaps this tendency is what causes geeks to be more or less similar in that we tend to care more about our field(s) of choice than things like government propaganda. Geeks tend not to be racist because hate takes time and effort that could be better applied to developing a better understanding of the universe. Besides, if you give in to stupid petty hatreds, you might miss something that some member of one of those social groups has to say about computers, or astronomy, or what have you.

    One thing that comes back to me time and time again is that people all over the world have the same potential. One thing that has led me to that conclusion is geekdom. Racism or most other -isms would just get in the way.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    1. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Don't give me that crap. Look at how women and other religions are treated in Saudi Arabia before you spout off.

      Women aren't even allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia and they have religious police that murdered school girls by not allowing them out of a burning building because they where not 'dressed' correctly. When you make the decision that dress in more important than the lives of kids you are a majorly fucked up society.

      I could go on, but I have work to do. If you wish, please feel free to continue this via email.

    2. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by d_i_r_t_y · · Score: 3, Insightful

      you are a majorly fucked up society.

      when you have to have metal detectors at schools you are in a majorly fucked up society. something to think about.

    3. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by localman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And likewise the major cause of the Jihad is not religion but politics as well. It has little to do with Islam in particular, and is rather a common trait of all blendings politics and religion. Two powerful ideologies get wrapped up and all hell breaks loose. At least it would seem so according to history.

      Cheers.

    4. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      In certain places in America, individuals of a certain skin tone are not allowed to use a pay phone (Police harass them for loitering). In certain places in America they have police who murder individuals of a certain skin tone because...well because they are inidviduals of a certain skin tone. When you make the decesion that skin tone is more important than the lives of certain individuals you are a majorly fucked up society.
      One could conclude that American geeks stand by idle while this occurs, therefore are we just as guilty? I think not. One should not judge a person based solely upon the culture to which they belong .

    5. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Mr_Icon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Women aren't even allowed to drive in Saudi Arabia and they have religious police that murdered school girls by not allowing them out of a burning building because they where not 'dressed' correctly. When you make the decision that dress in more important than the lives of kids you are a majorly fucked up society.

      Is this *more* or *fewer* dead kids than all school shooting victims in the US in the past year? I'm thinking there is more than one fucked up society here...

      --
      If you open yourself to the foo, You and foo become one.
    6. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Bombula · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's easy to rant against the ills of an entire society. America is a big target too, from the most deaths by guns, world's biggest gangs and sickest criminals (more serial killers than everyone else put together), largest corporate crimes, largest environmental crimes, state-sanctioned murder, blurring lines between church and state, right-wing fundamentalist nutcases, elections that make a mockery of democracy, KKK and entire regions thick with racist, ignorant scumbags - on and on and on.

      The whole point of this article, which is seemingly lost on the above poster, is that in contrast to whatever vast societal differences may separate individuals, we can share many things in common - often on profoundly meaningful levels.

      As an American aid worker living and working in the middle east, I can tell you point blank that the reason why there is conflict between our two societies is because there are assholes on both sides. The above post is demonstrative of that fact.

      --
      A-Bomb
    7. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Fourteen little girls burned to death in the Saudi fire.[1] I couldn't find a reference for the past year, but for the year July 1, 1999, to June 30, 2000, there were sixteen homicides in schools where the victims were children.[2]

      So while more kids died in school shootings in the US for the years sampled than little girls burned to death in Saudi Arabia, you have to keep some other factors in mind:
      1: Saudi Arabia has a population of roughly 24 million. The US has a population of roughly 290 million. So for the two statistics to be equilivant, there would've had to have been 193 school shootings in one year. As is, the ratio of deaths is much lower in the US.
      2: People in the US recognize that school shootings are a problem. We take active steps to counter them, and from all indications those steps are working. The Saudis didn't seem to care that little girls burned to death, there haven't been any major sweeping changes of the Ministry for the Prevention of Vice and Promotion of Virtue.
      3: When school kids kill each other with guns, it is a criminal act not sanctioned by the government. When Saudi authorities lock little girls in their school and make them burn to death, it is a criminal act sanctioned by the government.

      --
      God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    8. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      *yawn* Two wrongs don't make a right.

      Or to be specific:

      The existence of evil in America does not change, mitigate or otherwise affect the existence of greater evil in Saudi Arabia.

      (And if your post was 'Insightful', I'm Toxie the Toxic Avenger.)

    9. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Curtman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Look at how women and other religions are treated in Saudi Arabia before you spout off

      Think about how the Americans have conducted themselves around the world before you spout off. Some of the highlights include the genocide against the native Americans, slavery, and government sanctioned discrimination against those people until very recently, the supply of arms to these very same r'egimes, supplying arms to central America, etc, etc.

      And at least in muslim countries you know that Islam is the law of the land. Here they tell us there is seperation of church and state, but you get Dubya spouting off about God, and other foolishness that only helps paint us as "pro-jew". Why is it gays can't marry if its not related to religion? Why are you asked to pledge allegiance to God? Why can't people choose to end their own life to end their suffering? Why are people imprisoned for possessing marijuana?

      We're supposed to be frightened about the existence of WMD, and they are being developed here without any concern. Maybe someone should come along and liberate us.

    10. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Curtman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Fourteen little girls burned to death in the Saudi fire

      Thankfully that kind of stuff never happens here.

    11. Re:Geeks everywhere are (essentially) the same by Pros_n_Cons · · Score: 2, Insightful

      when you have to have metal detectors at schools you are in a majorly fucked up society. something to think about.

      Those metal detecters are there because a handfull of people went nuts, The US saw a problem and is trying to rectify it. What has S.A. done to prevent locking children in and setting them ablaze? Oh wait, it was thier idea in the first place.. Yeah I can see how much worse the U.S. is.....

      What happens in the U.S. can only be compared if we are NOT activly trying to do something about it, enron scandles, school shootings, pervers, gangs, serial killers.. all those bad things are a problem we strongly try to prevent, not encourage! We have the free speech to fight our fights and not be shot in times square for daring to say it. If you don't see a difference there. Perhaps its time you take a step back and clear your head.

      --

      -- "of course thats just my opinion, I could be wrong." --Dennis Miller
  2. Umm... by jabberjaw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why wouldn't they be "just like us"?

    1. Re:Umm... by tomstdenis · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And this is much different then how blacks were/are treated? How people critical about religion down south are treated [or in government]?

      When's the last time someone said "God fuck America" out loud? Have you ever worn a Nazi emblem just for kicks? etc. etc.

      I think you'll find that things you take for granted right where you live can be construed by others as "extreme".

      Tom

      --
      Someday, I'll have a real sig.
    2. Re:Umm... by Haeleth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because they believe that women are lesser creatures that have next to no rights?

      Look at how women and other religious minorities are treated before you start saying that other geeks are just like them.


      Um, they do? Show me the bit in the articles where it said that all the Saudi geeks were 100% behind the fundamentalist excesses of their government.

      I might as well conclude that all American geeks are creationists? After all, some people in your government are creationists, so obviously that applies to every member of the population too!

  3. I, for one... by inode_buddha · · Score: 5, Insightful

    think it would be great if we all actually *did* get along just once. If geeks can help that, so much the better!

    --
    C|N>K
  4. Well.. by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Save for the fact that they treat women like lesser beings that have next to no rights...

    1. Re:Well.. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 1, Insightful
      Save for the fact that they treat women like lesser beings that have next to no rights...
      Where does this 'fact' come from? I imagine from the same place as the 'fact' that all Americans are uncultured fat cowbows with no knowledge of the rest of the world whatsoever, or the 'fact' that all Europeans are liberal hippies who smell like cheese. It comes from ignorance.

      You should know better than to generalise like that. Shame on you.
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    2. Re:Well.. by Haeleth · · Score: 4, Insightful

      That's talking about Saudi fundamentalists, not Saudi geeks. You know, there are "Christian" fundamentalists in America who believe that women should have no rights, too, but we don't go round accusing all Americans of believing that.

      There are probably people in Norway who believe things that would disgust you as well as me, but I'm not going to accuse you of beliving the same things as they do just because you live in the same country. Please accord Saudis the same respect.

    3. Re:Well.. by C10H14N2 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I find it interesting that ANY attempt to portray any other aspect of Saudi life, with all that implies, that doesn't include the familiar propaganda, which of course may be true, is met with furious opposition as any statement other than the party line on the subject should be put down.

      The articles in question were vignettes on a much more human, reasonable side of Saudi life. Oh, the heresy. These complaints smack of 1980's propaganda about the Soviet Union wherein any attempt to humanize even the most lowly of citizens on the other side to a degree that didn't fit that approved portrayal was viewed as practically treasonous.

      If the articles concluded that Saudi Arabia was a wonderful idyllic land of nothing but brotherly and sisterly love with no social problems, fine, fire away. However, the writer has acknowledged the problems and chosen to move on, leaving that analysis to the droves of writers that have already written volumes on the subject and continue every day.

      This sort of journalism illustrates what isn't on the standard yellow journalistic boilerplate and does so with integrity. The endless spewing of vitriol at such an objective account shows the fragility of the standard-issue American view on all things foreign and belies its assumed basis in truth.

    4. Re:Well.. by HrothgarReborn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is a problem of their society. Are there not things in Western governments we disagree with. I have been to the Middle East. Geeks are a rare commodity but they are usually more liberal and less tied to traditional mindsets than their neighbors. These are the people most likely to effect change in thier country. I would no more saddle them with the womens right issues of Muslim countries than I would blame /.ers for the patent laws of Western governments.

    5. Re:Well.. by minairia · · Score: 3, Insightful

      true, but in America it isn't official policy supposedly based on the word of God to treat women like animals. In this country, it is the pefect right of someone to be a hard core Chrisitan fundamentalist male chauvinist. However, this person can not use these values in the work place or in society beyond a certain limit without being sued or arrested.

  5. Perceived Differences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you can actually post a story about perceived differences it only goes to show that you harbor some sort of mentality which seperates you from the next man/geek whatever.

    The essence of this topic is that we are all human beings besides different culture, attitudes and religions. When someone sits at a keyboard the way they use it is going to be most likely the same way you use yours; key layout may be different but they are still using their fingers to do the typing.

    A geek is a geek is a geek. Before computers geeks existed and after they will exist, all over the world. Maybe Slashdot should concentrate more on that fact than the differences between people who aren't at all different in any respect when it comes to "geek" attitude and really Slashdot as a forum is really starting to become nothing but a troll board for half witted comics and "geek" sideliners; none of which are funny or know what they are talking about.

    Can we get back to News for Nerds, Stuff that matters.?

  6. Re:True litmus test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Bad example. Natalie Portman (a.k.a. Natalie Hershlag) was born in Israel and would therefore be considered a monkey and/or pig.

  7. Re:Too thorough comparision by October_30th · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Ok, and now take that idea a little bit further.

    Why restrict it to geeks in the first place...

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  8. Unlike us. Period. by lonesometrainer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Us? So what's us? I thought this is somehow international here...

    Unlike us, because we have a solid middle-class with kids that can afford to be geeks. Geeks whom may surf for porn, express their political opinion and whear stuff people are wearing on MTV.

    Where's that free, liberal solid middle-class in SA?

  9. Roblimo, Saudia Arabia, Open Source and Freedom by LibrePensador · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Roblimo's article highlight -perhaps inadvertently- the important and profound differences between the open source and free software communities. While these communities collaborate as a practical matter, and may need each other for their survival, one is political and principled, the other pragmatic and concerned overall with technological imperatives.

    So is there a problem with this? I believe there is. You see, Microsoft, or any other software development house, can afford to optimize its development methodology or even start from scratch a la Apple, if it really became all that self-evident to them that they were technically and financially failing. So one of two things can happen:

    1) if they throw enough money at the problem, they will match our technical achivements. Apple started from scratch and has produced a decent OS built on top of BSD/Darwin/Mach. So it is doable.

    2) They do not match our technical achiviements. Yet at the end of the day, if the only thing we care about is having an open source operating system regardless of whether it advances the cause of freedom, then the labor of love of all these years will seem a little less meaningful to many of us. To me, it will be all seem pretty hollow.

    And here's where I have a problem with Roblimo's articles. He does not question the irony that the Saudy monarchy is using free software to exercise censorship and control. Even if some of can be circumvented, it is perversed to those that believe in Free Software to see this happen. And in respecting the freedom of the license, we must allow it, but we should call oppression by its name when we come across it and he did not have the guts to do it.

    He could have looked for hactivists in Saudi Arabia to see what tools they were using and how they were furthering the cause of freedom. He could have spoken to dissidents, but he didin't. It's easy to stay at a comfy hotel and write from the sidelines. It's easier to be an expectator paying lipservice to free softaware than to stand up for what free softare actually represents.

    In summary, being technically superior without being morally committed to the cause of freedom is a very hollow undertaking.

    --
    Pragmatism as an ideology is not particularly pragmatic in the long term. Keep it in mind when you dismiss Free Software
  10. Geekness == culture by 2.246.1010.78 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Isn't geekness just a culture where people worship technology. And from my experience they are very conservative in their way.

    so there is no fundamental difference in my eyes and especially no cultural gap for the saudis.

  11. like us? by enkidu87 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What are "we" like?

  12. Hmmm by LS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Does anyone else consider this topic to be implicitly racist? Arabs aren't fucking aliens. It reminds me of the Chris Rock joke (paraphrased):

    When Collin Powel considered running for president, all the white people mentioned that "He speaks so well. He speaks so well". How the fuck is he supposed to speak? "Ima be pres-o-dent!"

    geez.

    LS

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  13. Bad Story!! by killfixx · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This smacks of something out of a teen girls magazine!

    Are Muslim field hockey players just like us other girls?

    GAH!

    --
    "Helping to keep you two steps ahead of the Thought Police!"
  14. Re:no.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    You think living with a woman that doesn't want to be with you would be fun? Hell would be like a holiday camp after that.

  15. Re:Not racist about sandfleas by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Insightful

    Just pointing out the differences and showing how worthless Arabs are in addition to being a waste of natural resources.

    Maybe after ~3000 of them are murdered in cold blood I might give a damn enough to donate an old log of shit. But until then fuckem, they deserve every horror and attrocity that comes their way along with every stereotype.

    Damn Camelhumper.

  16. No. by autopr0n · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I doubt this is true. The same love for computers and tech? Probably. But this doesn't make them "the same". I really doubt that many Saudi Geeks would have the same libertarian, open-society, atheistic outlook that many geeks here in the US seem to have.

    There seems to be this big misconception that anyone who likes computers is therefore a "geek" and also therefore has a similar political/philosophical outlook.

    This isn't to say that I think everyone in Saudi Arabia is some kind of crazy religious zealot, but if you grow up in that kind of environment, a lot of it would probably rub off on you.

    The Saudis, at least the people in charge, are like the Taliban with gold Rolexes.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:No. by sydlexic · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I guess you don't know any Arabs. They are quite liberal. This is especially true of the younger generation. The people in charge are not the Taliban ... but they are resposible for the rise of fundamentalism through corruption, cronyism and basically being too self-absorbed to really care about the countries they're in charge of. They've left that to the powerful, unelected religious leaders. And it's *these* people who are the prime benefactors of the Wests gross misconceptions and indifference to the Arab people. The anger that generates only fuels more fundamentalism.

    2. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This isn't to say that I think everyone in Saudi Arabia is some kind of crazy religious zealot, but if you grow up in that kind of environment, a lot of it would probably rub off on you.

      Okay, I dare say this will be taken as a troll, but to many of us outsiders the USA looks like a society with more than its fair share of crazy religious zealots, but I still realise that you're not all like that. Is religious fundamentalism more ingrained in Saudi Arabia than in the USA? Maybe, maybe not, but I'm sure there must be exceptions either way.

    3. Re:No. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They are quite liberal. This is especially true of the younger generation.

      To test this hypothesis, try arguing about the Koran. The Arabs that I have known cannot debate religion in the way that we debate religion.

      Try asking them about the status of woemen; the same brick wall comes up.

      There is nothing wrong with this IMHO. They can live in whatever way that they want, as long as they dont try and make me live like them in my own country. In this way, we can have peace forever, and everyone can follow whatever life they want.

      These people are not like us, in every way that counts - but thats OK this is the breakthrough that people have to make.

    4. Re:No. by blamanj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So you're saying they have a society where some people get involved in technology very heavily, where people tend to adopt the local culture rather than choose a foreign one, and their leaders once they get power want desperately to keep it?

      Sounds like people pretty much everywhere.

      Without condoning Saudi treatment of women, recall that in the grand scheme of things, our liberal culture is relatively recent. Only 30 years ago you could get the death penalty for rape (and you still can in Louisiana). We still had public executions 70 years ago. Women couldn't vote 100 years ago, 150 years ago slavery was not only condoned but a large part of the country's economy was built on it.

      Yes, we've advanced beyond all of that, but we're not so far from it as some people would like to think.

    5. Re:No. by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Libertarian? I don't think so. Most Slashdot commenters these days seem to be avowed members of the antiamerican, antisemitic, antiwar left (and rather shrill ones at that). If you don't believe me, try arguing that maybe, just maybe, deposing a brutal dictator that has been steadily murdering his own people for decades (and who, by the way, was a Soviet client long before he recieved any American support) wasn't such a bad idea after all. Or pointing out that Clinton himself was convinced up to the very end that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction.

      So, Clinton is the archetypal libertarian now? That's news to me.

      When I say "libertarian" i mean "the government stays out of peoples lives as much as possible" not "The government lies about WMD to launch a war of conquest costing billions of dollars and hundreds of American lives." or "Agrees with ESR". How exactly is going to war in iraq furthering the goals of Individual liberty in america?

      --
      autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    6. Re:No. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sheer amount of American anal porn spam that I get in my inbox each day would seem to suggest that it's Americans who treat women badly.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    7. Re:No. by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Having lived in the USA, UK and France I would observe that I've never seen the kind of insane Chrisitian-nonsense (or, indeed, pro-gun) bumper stickers in Europe that are so commonplace in the US.

      You see the odd pro-hunting sticker in both the UK and France, but more for Greenpeace!

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    8. Re:No. by Jonathan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      try arguing that maybe, just maybe, deposing a brutal dictator that has been steadily murdering his own people for decades (and who, by the way, was a Soviet client long before he recieved any American support) wasn't such a bad idea after all.

      Odd, that the US never lifted a finger against either Pinochet or Franco, who were much nastier dictators than Saddam.. and of course the North Korean communists, who without question have WMD merit nothing more than strong language. Hell, I'd *love* it if the US was a force against dictatorships in general, but it isn't -- it's just a force against dictatorships that somehow threaten US businesses.

    9. Re:No. by Zan+Zu+from+Eridu · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I really doubt that many Saudi Geeks would have the same libertarian, open-society, atheistic outlook that many geeks here in the US seem to have.

      Don't project your opinions on the group you think you belong to. To a lot of geeks, atheism is just as stupid as theism (you're still assuming things about "God", but can't define what "God" is), and uncontrolled libertarianism is just as stupid as unbridled socialism (why trust business more than government?).

      There seems to be this big misconception that anyone who likes computers is therefore a "geek" and also therefore has a similar political/philosophical outlook.

      Yes, and the misconception is yours. There is nothing that says you have to be a libertarian or an atheist to be a geek. Why would there be a PS geek code if we're all libertarians?

      This isn't to say that I think everyone in Saudi Arabia is some kind of crazy religious zealot, but if you grow up in that kind of environment, a lot of it would probably rub off on you.

      Probably just as much as that feeling of cultural superiority rubs off on a lot of westerners. There are a lot of little kings out there who think it's their godgiven right to pass judgement on everyone in the world (but get utterly nasty if you treat them the same way). It doesn't really matter if the superiority attidude comes from a religious or from a socio-economical background, the result is the same.

      The Saudis, at least the people in charge, are like the Taliban with gold Rolexes.

      Yeah cool, but what has this got to do with Saudi geeks?

    10. Re:No. by sejanus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Here's a newsflash for you.

      Though Australia "officially" actively supports America's stance on recent issues such as Afghanistan/Iraq - the people on the street generally don't, and more to the point they regard USA as *THE* place full of whacko's full of cults, school children with guns, snipers hunting the streets, death row full of hundreds of guys waiting for the chair, countless murders and robberies, areas where it isn't safe to go at night (or day) - and plenty more.

      And lets not forget Jerry Springer.

      Your message said ;

      "This isn't to say that I think everyone in Saudi Arabia is some kind of crazy religious zealot, but if you grow up in that kind of environment, a lot of it would probably rub off on you. "

      What if I wrote ;

      "This isn't to say that I think everyone in USA is some kind of crazy zealot and kills/robs, but if you grow up in that kind of environment, a lot of it would probably rub off on you. "

      Is that necessarily accurate? I don't believe so - but it's a common belief. I bet you wouldn't like to be associated with all the elements I wrote above, so conversely you should not point a finger at Saudi's with the same blanket outlook,a accusing them of having ties to the Taliban's outlook on life. What the hell would you know? How many Saudi's do you personally know? I'd bet zero.

    11. Re:No. by use_compress · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Is religious fundamentalism more ingrained in Saudi Arabia than in the USA? Maybe, maybe not, but I'm sure there must be exceptions either way.

      The difference between the religious zealots in America and those in Saudi Arabia is that the ones in America don't lock school girls in a burning school because they can't find their burkas. In America, we don't have massive public beheadings in soccer stadiums. In America, everybody has the right to practice their religion with out obstruction by the government. This does not happen in France and certainly does not happen in Saudi Arabia. There is no comparison.

    12. Re:No. by geekee · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "would have the same libertarian, open-society, atheistic outlook that many geeks here in the US seem to have."

      /. geeks are not libertarians. No libertarian believes in monopoly regulation, yet the majority of /.ers believe it is right to regulate Microsoft.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    13. Re:No. by Gonoff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      As a European (Scottish) Christian, I have much less trouble with the ideas of tree huggers, veggies and dislikers of polluion than I do with some of the ideas I gear come from US "conservatives" and religious zealots.

      They are all in need of God.

      --
      I'll see your Constitution and raise you a Queen.
  17. People are pretty much the same around the world by arasinen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's not just geeks. It's not just USA and Saudi-Arabia.

    Physiologically people are quite the same. Some have folds in their eyes, some have lost pigment from their skin and some have fat in different places. These are only cosmetical differences. Inside we're all the same.

    If you look at Maslow's hierarchy of needs, you'll see that the bottom layers are physiological, safety, and love. These are what every person in the world wants. They don't want to sit in the cold, they don't want to be hungry and they don't want to be afraid. (Yet some are.) And people want love and want to love.

    The only substantial difference between different nations is due to culture. Some are born in conservative countries, some in liberal. Others live in religious areas, others have secular rule. Yet despite this, people still practice arts, science, whatever. You have geeks in Saudi-Arabia and deeply religious people in USA.

    Whatever group of people you look, you'll find innovative people there. I recently received a revelation about this subject while reading "Guns, Germs and Steel" by Jared Diamond. (Excellent book, recommended). His examples showed how people have adapted to all sorts of environments and made the best use of available resources. If this does not restore your faith in mankind, nothing will.

    It is true that there is a deep cultural divide between the Western world and the countries of the East, and I don't see the current political situation to lessen the situation at all. However, this is mostly due to ignorance. If you see two small children playing with toys, do you care if one of them is a Jew and another one an Arab? Do the children care? No.

    If Mr. Bush had met Mr. Hussein in a neutral and safe environment before the war, would they have fought with their bare fists. Probably not. Their nations fought one another, perhaps even their ideologies. But the people themselves... you can hardly ever find a good reason to strike at your fellow man. (This teaching, it would seem, lies at the heart of every religion. Sadly it is not observed very often.)

    The only way to fight this is to get rid of the prejudice and the fear. If you can, travel to different countries and try to see beneath the surface. People are the same, even in France. Try to learn about different cultures. If you can't spare the money, go to http://www.wikipedia.org/ and read about the different achievements of cultures both long gone and present. Read about their times of glory and downfall. Go to a library and read a book. (Once again I recommend "Guns, Germs and Steel".

    I'd like to end this rant with a quote from Charlie Chaplin. At the end of "The Dictator," the Jewish barber (who looks like Adolf Hynkel) gives a rather touching speech about universal harmony. (Emphasis mine.)

    "I'm sorry but I don't want to be an emperor. That's not my business. I don't want to rule or conquer anyone. I should like to help everyone if possible; Jew, Gentile, black men, white. We all want to help one another. Human beings are like that. We want to live by each others' happiness, not by each other's misery. We don't want to hate and despise one another.

    In this world there is room for everyone. And the good earth is rich and can provide for everyone. The way of life can be free and beautiful, but we have lost the way. Greed has poisoned men's souls; has barricaded the world with hate; has goose-stepped us into misery and bloodshed. We have developed speed, but we have shut ourselves in. Machinery that gives abundance has left us in want. Our knowledge as made us cynical; our cleverness, hard and unkind. We think too much and feel too little.

    More than machinery we need humanity. More than cleverness, we need kindness and gentleness. Without these qualities, life will be violent and all will be lost. The aeroplane and the radio have brought us closer together. The very nature of these things cries out for the goodness in man; cries out for universal brotherhood; for the unity of us all."

    --
    [ Antti Rasinen ]
  18. Re:True litmus test by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Hello, are you stupid? Grandparent was noting that the Arabs would be racist to Natalie, not claiming any racist feeling of his own.

    And he's right.

  19. Article says by $exyNerdie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Conversations with geeks in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia are similar to conversations with geeks anywhere, and most of the ones I have met so far are smart, young, single men who are addicted to the problem-solving aspect of programming.

    I know of many geeks who are not single. For the rest, it is the society/media that glamorizes football jocks and the thugs these days over people who are in the field of science/technology ....

  20. Sure, unless they're women. by autopr0n · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In which case, they need to wear burkas, not work, and be totally subservient to their man.

    Geeks tend not to be racist because hate takes time and effort that could be better applied to developing a better understanding of the universe.

    Please. Most American geeks tend not to be white-supremacists or anything like that because modern American culture abhors that kind of thinking. You won't find any kind of "racist" anywhere, unless you look very hard.

    On the other hand, have you ever read slashdot? Look at all the anti-Indian hysteria in any thread about H1-B or off shoring. It's the same unthinking "us vs. them, they're taking our jobs" attitude that all racism is borne out of. Maybe they won't take the final step to true racism (i.e. anyone of Indian decent == bad), but it's just as bad (any Indian == bad job stealer).

    A couple years ago, there was an article about a fiber-optic link around Africa. I was shocked when I read the comments. People were pissed, like it was some kind of a waste (even though it was being done by African countries expecting to make a profit). The racist comments in that thread were beyond the pail.

    Geeks have just as much capacity for ugliness as anyone else. I'm willing to bet that "geeks" in SA have the same sort of opinions on religious diversity, women's rights, etc that most of the country does, which is pretty bad.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  21. I think that... by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Most people are just people trying to live their lives, with the nutbag assholes being in the vast minority. Unfortunately it doesn't take many nutbag assholes to ruin the image of everyone else.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  22. nice flame. by twitter · · Score: 1, Insightful
    [Collin Powel] He speaks so well". How the fuck is he supposed to speak?

    Better than GW Bush?

    Better than you write, that's for sure.

    Does anyone else consider this topic to be implicitly racist?

    No, ding-a-ling. Islam's got it's own thing going on and Saudi Arabia is where it comes from. Get a clue - not everyone thinks like you do.

    It's not what you don't know. It's what you don't know you don't know that's overwhelming.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  23. Re:No you moron. by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 3, Insightful
    SA's laws are out in the open, not a secret, and they are horrible.
    And SA's laws were written by their geeks? I don't see how the statement 'Saudi Geeks, all Saudi Geeks, treat their women like lesser beings' can be construed as a fact, rather that the obvious stereotype that it is.
    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  24. class vs. race by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When people get mad at foreigners for "taking their jobs away", it's not racism - it's economics. People get just as mad when the foreigners are of the same race. It's rational competition. Even though it's wrong. People should be mad at their fellow countrymen, who run the corporations that offshore their jobs. Those suits get subsidized every which way to develop their corporations, then break the system that supports them by sending the labor dollar into an unconnected economy overseas. Geeks should see the light better than their failed predecessors in the car, steel and other uneducated industries, and rein in the corporations that are squandering their civilization for an unsustainable fast buck.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:class vs. race by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      People get just as mad when the foreigners are of the same race. It's rational competition.

      Or when it's people with green eyes. If they weren't taking jobs there would be more for the rest of us. It's rational competition.

  25. i Norge by h4rm0ny · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are probably people in Norway who believe things that would disgust you as well as me

    Ja! Not imprisoning kids for fifteen years for cracking some silly protection system, having politicians who take home a reasonable salary and have no commercial interests and many other cultural idiosyncracies that may seem odd to a US citizen. ;)

    But seriously,intelligence depends on a willingness to think for oneself. It should be no surprise that it is these people who are least constrained by the arbitary beliefs of their culture.

    Smart people have more in common with smart people wherever they are from than with the stupid people next door.

    --

    Aide-toi, le Ciel t'aidera - Jeanne D'Arc.
  26. Who said anything about animals? by The+Tyro · · Score: 3, Insightful

    (generally, $120,000 and up, plus signing bonus.)

    Actually, it was more than that.

    Perhaps this is difficult for you to understand, but Americans are extremely fond of speaking their minds... both in private, and public. In America, if I wanted to walk around in front of a catholic church with a blood-drenched picture of the pope, accusing him of horrible crimes, I could do it (not that I would, but you get the idea). In Saudi Arabia, that could get you beheaded.

    I would not want to force my wife to wear something she didn't agree with, particularly something that is required by a religion we don't practice, that ostensibly puts her in a subservient position. I consider women to be my equal in virtually everything, excepting perhaps physical size and strength. I have a problem with subjecting my wife to possible humiliation, interrogation, and virtual imprisonment just to make a few bucks.

    Judging by the reaction of muslims when their women are prohibited from wearing veils in schools and drivers license photographs, it's obvious you can appreciate my point. You don't like being forced, and neither do I.

    As for being courteous and polite, that goes both ways... you could expect my politeness to end, with extreme prejudice, the moment some muttawa religious policeman tried to strike my wife with his stick because he could see skin above her ankles in public. All cultural differences aside, if you strike a man's wife in front of him, you'd better be prepared for the consequences, whether you're Saudi or American.

    Call me an ugly american if you want, but I have a problem with asking my wife to live in an environment like that, even for a year or two... I simply have too much respect for her.

    Some things are more important than money.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  27. Re:They don't have girlfriends, either. by md358 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't envy the position of women in Saudi Arabia, but I'm informed enough to know that it's primarily a cultural, not religious situation.

    Funny isn't it? Enslave a man and it's a crime against humanity. Enslave a woman and it's cultural.

    You won't find very many women in the world so blase over such a "cultural" difference.

  28. Re:extremely fond of speaking their minds by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Uh, fighting in a workplace is a good way to get yourself fired, regardless of what started the fight. No one owes you a job, and the best way to stay employed is to do your job instead of getting into heated conversations about politics.

  29. Re:True litmus test by FredFnord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    > Arabs don't hate Jews, they hate Israel.

    Well, it's nice to know that there aren't any Arabs who hate Jews. I'll sleep a lot better now that I know such an authority as yourself has declared the Arab world free of any such sentiments.

    Actually, of course, if you look at any semi-reputable news organization (and by this I mean some news organizations in Europe, because anything in the US, Israel, or most of the Arab world is just organized propoganda) the prejudice of Arabs against Jews, and Jews against Arabs, is quite marked. And equally unfortunate (and unfair) on both sides.

    > A racist state set up by terrorists and supported by racists.

    There are elements of truth and falsehood in this, as in most statements that are made by fanatics. With most fanatics, the elements of falsehood greatly outweigh the elements of truth. I won't presume to judge in this particular case.

    I also except statements made by people like Rush Limbaugh, which, as often as not, actually contain no element of truth what so ever. ("Styrofoam is biodegradable!")

    > EVERYONE should hate Israel, just as they shouldn't hate Jews.

    I'm always delighted to be told who to hate.

    However, I in general like to not actually hate anyone. I know this makes me a lousy American, as well as someone committing the fundamental solicism of disagreeing with you, Mr. Partridge, but I've always found that hating tendes to lead to suffering. On both sides.

    But hey, if that's what you're looking for, you have fun.

    -fred

    --
    Sign #11 of Slashdot overdose: You see the phrase 'moderate Republican' and you wonder if that would be a +1 or a -1.
  30. An explaination. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I'm white and I don't find Chris Rock racist. I find him incredibly funny and think he has some touchingly bitter (and intelligent) comments on society. He makes fun of what he sees as stupid. Race is often used to drive the point home or construct a joke. But race is not his target, stupidity and intollerence are (except when occasionally poking gentle fun).

    The quote in the parent comment was in regards to a white person's view of Colin Powell. He picked up on a news article that included the revelation that Powell "speaks so well". He pointed out that was retarded and then he made fun of what those people would expect a black president to sound like based on their comments:

    "Ima be pres-o-dent"

    In the same routine, goes on to point out that such stereotypes aren't uniquely held by white people - nor that they aren't without cause. His own definition of the term "nigger" describes the black minority who are destructive, have bad priorities, refuse to grow up and who keep setting back society. He made fun of it by pointing out that not knowing anything seems to be thought of as cool by some:

    "Shit.. I don't know man. What you wanna know that shit for? I don't need no learnin'. I don't need no readin'. But lemme axe you this.. lemme axe you this.. can you kick *my* ass?"

    He's entirely correct about these priorities being absurd and self-destructive in many youths - both black and white. Nobody's going to help society if all they worry about is beating each other up.

  31. Re:The US *Does* have to many religious zelots by sydlexic · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Fortunetly they have been kept in check by our constitution

    Until now.

  32. fundamentalist populations by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The last thing I want to see is an Islamic country with a large fundamentalist population picking up expertise in missle technology.

    I'm not that crazy about powerful fundamentalist groups in any country having control over sophisticated weaponry - the United States included.

  33. Religious nuts by FrenchyinCT · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, we have our religious zealots and so do the Saudis, but there's one really BIG difference. *Our* religious zealots blow up abortion clinics and shoot doctors one by one; *their* religious zealots hijack planes and fly them into buildings. There's not a huge amount of difference between the two flavors of zealotry, but *our* zealots live in a country where they're not allowed to get away with nearly as much violence. Saudi society has embraced Wahabbism, the particularly violent flavor of Islam, and they make Operation Rescue look like a bunch of hippie pacifists.