Slashdot Mirror


Sharing IT Problems with Executives?

dicey asks: "Later this week all of the IT department at my company (50-80 people) is having a dinner with the company President and VP/CIO. One major reason for this is so that they can get a better understanding of what is going on in IT and how it impacts the company overall. Ideally, with the ideas and sharing, these guys will have a better appreciation for us, adjust our budgets appropriately, and help us in our business. However, many of us are wary to speak about what is going on because it will inevitably reveal problems with the company. We are worried about what we discuss coming back to our directors ultimately to bite us. I am curious what my fellow Slashdot readers have done in similar circumstances, where there is a great chance to let someone high up in your company know of problems so that they can be rectified, but whereby revealing them you may get hurt in the process."

35 of 562 comments (clear)

  1. Get your resume together by corbettw · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If your company is having problems and you don't feel safe doing your duty and informing the higher ups, you need to start looking for a new job. In the meantime, don't rock the boat.

    --
    God invented whiskey so the Irish would not rule the world.
    1. Re:Get your resume together by ahacop@wmuc.umd.edu · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have to agree with this. You are not in the position to affect any change politically in the company. You will not be able to convince upper management to listen to you. They will be more willing to give lower management the benefit of the doubt and will look at you like a crank.

    2. Re:Get your resume together by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed.

      Theoretically, you're all working toward the same goal - increased efficiency / productivity / profitability. IN THE REAL WORLD, knowledge is power and your fiercest competitors aren't rival companies IT depts, they're your own own colleagues and - particularly - your own management.

      My advice? Keep everything business critical you know secret and use your knowledge to leverage your position to your own maximum advantage at ANY opportunity.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Get your resume together by cbreaker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I tried the route of going to my CTO of me last company, and all he did was say "ohh ya?" and then I had my direct manager at my desk the next morning with a bit of a ... frown..

      I was fired three weeks later, for some dumb bullshit that you wouldn't get fired for unless you pissed off your boss.

      --
      - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    4. Re:Get your resume together by rgsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

      A few pieces of advice from an experienced "upper manager":

      1. Make sure all suggestions are positioned from the perspective of how they will help the company achieve increased revenue, reduced costs, or a strategic advantage IN YOUR CORE BUSINESS. Management could give a shit about technology - until you translate it into dollars that they can count.

      2. Be ready to back up your suggestions with FACT. Best to get your middle managers to help you with this, as they will know better than you what upper management will view as factual information.

      3. DO NOT discuss technical details, even if they ask. Simply state that you'd be happy to put together a timeline, staffing plan, and budget regarding the necessary effort to implement your suggestion if they'd like to see it.

      4. Be SURE to tie your suggestions to other business initiatives. It's unlikely that they'd move to implement something unless it can be tied to the company's current direction in spending.

      Lastly, be sure to point out something positive about your team/group/department and it's leadership. You'll come across as a team player who is NOT just looking for personal glory, which will give them more reason to believe your suggestion has merit and has been thought out.

    5. Re:Get your resume together by sphealey · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Make sure all suggestions are positioned from the perspective of how they will help the company achieve increased revenue, reduced costs, or a strategic advantage IN YOUR CORE BUSINESS. Management could give a shit about technology - until you translate it into dollars that they can count
      Counter-argument from another experienced manager: your statement assumes that corporate management has no responsibility to, well, manage the internal operations of the business. It is a conceit of the 1990s that there are some sort of "core functions" and everything else a corporation does is non-core and can be ignored, abused, or outsourced. Read the Thorn/EMI CAT scanner case for a good example of what happens when that thinking is taken to its logical extreme...

      sPh

    6. Re:Get your resume together by philg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      "Bottom line... when your boss and the company higher ups are not on the same page, the company higher ups will be seeking direct reports from the lower-level IT staff."

      If this is meant to imply to the original poster that the upper brass are meeting with the plebians because they they're suspicious of the people in the middle, you may be right. You may also be wrong.

      Reasons to meet with the great unwashed:

      • The aforementioned short-circuit because upper doesn't trust middle.
      • The exact opposite of the aforementioned short-circuit -- upper management supports the middle management but knows the workers don't, so they meet with everyone to make sure they know this. (Note that airing your problems at this point probably won't win you friends, unlike the previous example.)
      • Upper management wants to be seen as accessible. The meal is internal PR.
      • Lots of other stuff I can't think of.

      The bottom line is, every situation is different. Too different for any of the advice presented on a forum full of strangers to be relevant, except by accident. (Except this advice, of course. :)

      My advice to you in this important meeting: enjoy the meal. Oh, and listen. I won't presume to know anything else.

      phil
  2. Simple Advice by CGP314 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Talk about the good things first, then air your complaints as suggestions.


    --
    In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

    American Weblog in London

    1. Re:Simple Advice by grahamsz · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'd agree with this one - stay positive.

      There's no point in making yourself out to be a whiner. Make constructive and reasonable suggestions. There's no point in asking for 50 new staff and 23" flat panels for everyone since it's very unlikely to happen, but if your suggestion will return on its investment then management might be interested.

      Also, make sure you've got a few positive suggestions up your sleeve, so when someone asks "Bob, what could we have done better last quarter?" you've got something constructive to say.

  3. be careful... by havaloc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You may be tempted to get everything (problems) out at dinner, but usually this will harm you in the long run. Be extremely careful on what you say, and what you do.

  4. Never by savagedome · · Score: 5, Insightful

    There is probably no good way of doing this at the company dinner. The size (50-80) makes it even more difficult as probably everybody will know (recognize) everybody else. You do not want to be the whistle blower of any kind. Sort of a catch-22 if you will.

    A better way that I've seen happen at my place is an anonymous ballot kind of thing. If the executives are interested, they will read the ballot. If not, well, then you live and learn.

    My 0.02$

  5. Skipping a level up in Management... by b0r0din · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I think if you're management isn't addressing the questions you have, you should be upfront and honest to the executives in the company about the problems you are facing. However, what issues you are dealing with? Is your IT spending up, is there talk of layoffs, what are your actual problems with your company's IT infrastructure?

    It's good that your president/CIO are having these discussions with you, as it shows they are concerned and want to know how to drive profit in their industry. They are concerned with the bottom line, so be honest and try to address the problems with the bottom line in mind. Will adding 1 million to the IT budget save 10 million? If you have concerns, or better, if you have ideas, share them, but only if you think they will help. Don't say you need 2million in new computers without explaining why that would drive profit up.

    1. Re:Skipping a level up in Management... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      This is dangerous advice.

      Any issue you raise with senior management is going to come right back down the chain of command to onto your boss' head. Most likely your boss is then going to be pissed that you fucked with his political strategy and went over his head.

      Quite frankly, if you don't have a good relationship with your immediate management, you have already lost. Going over their head isn't going help anything unless you mean it as a parting shot.

  6. Your job security depends on CYA? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If the executives are really taking the time to try to understand the issues that IT is having, maybe it's time to drop the defensiveness and be frank with your department's issues. There's no need to be accusative or plaintive. You just need to say that A, B, and C are the problems and that X, Y, and Z are the best solutions that IT believes exist.

    Management does not want to know what your problems are. They want to know what your solutions are. Prepare to give them solutions to your problems.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  7. This is probably the best thing to do by SlashingComments · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Have you seen the movie "office space" ? If not rent it and see it before going there.

    --

    - People who believe other people have no right to live, got no right to live ...

  8. I hate to say it.. by XaXXon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    but I have to agree with what a lot of other people said.

    Be *extremely* careful. Even valid and obvious complaints can get you in a lot of trouble.

    My advice? Keep your mouth shut.

  9. over the head by netfall · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It would seem to me that problems within the IT group should be brought to your manager / director or whoever is just above you in the chain of command before it would go to the CIO or VP. If the director sees fit to bring it to the executive level, then they should. Only if your direct supervisor is neglecting to fix problems / bring severe problems to their boss, should you have to go above their head to the executive level. I know that sounds like the Office Space problem of having 8 bosses, and that might not make sense in a business of 50-60 people as described - but it makes more sense in much larger organizations.

  10. Keep your fucking mouth shut by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Perform your duties as enumerated in your job description. No more, no less. Don't try to make things better, because you'll only piss people off who can make your life hell.

    Anything you say to the higher-ups will eventually trickle down to your immediate supervisor(s). If it makes them look bad, you'll eat shit until you quit or are otherwise drummed out of the company.

    Take it from someone who's been there... if you're an IT geek, when it comes to corporate politics, your kung fu is weak. Period. Accept it.

    Keep your head down, do only what you're supposed to, and keep your resume polished anyway, because you never know when your job will move overseas no matter how good you are at doing it.

  11. Color me pessimistic by 44BSD · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Realistically, how much can anyone learn from a dinner with 80 people, the vast majority of whom are going to be complete strangers? This is going to be a chance for the executives to mouth platitudes, for the IT "leadership" to get their knees and noses dirty, and for the peons to get a dinner that will come out of the Christmas bonus, ultimately.

    I advise you chat up the bartender, and try to get a six-pack or two into your laptop bag.

  12. Gauge the situation by kneecarrot · · Score: 5, Insightful
    My advice would be to gauge the nature of the individual in power. Is this someone who genuinely wants to improve things or is he going through the motions? Is he a no-BS type of person or does he tend to beat around the bush? How does he take criticism?

    If the answers are that he genuinely wants to improve things, is a no-BS type of person, and seems to be able to take criticism, then by all means take this gift and use it! Be specific, but try to not assign blame. Approach every issue from the perspective that it isn't a huge problem but rather an opportunity for improvement.

    Good luck!

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

  13. Problems, present solutions! by Aparthy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whenever you pose a problem, follow it up with a solution. That way it doesn't sound like you're complaining. Having solutions shows you actually care about your job and the company. Then you just need the go ahead to fix the problems.

  14. Step One by ScottSpeaks! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'd treat this event as a getting-to-know-you opportunity, and stop there. Be your best, most professional, likeable, and qualified version of yourself, to establish yourself to the suits as someone who cares about the company. If there are things they need to hear, you'll then have a better chance of them being taken seriously later, in a less hazardous context.

  15. Speak!!! by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If no-one talks, then don't expect any problems to get solved.

    Do the following:
    1)List all of the issues you would like to raise.
    2)Go back through the list and pick the few that you think are most important.
    3)For each issue script a clear description, and most importantly, script a solution to the problem. If you don't have a workable solution, then never escalate the problem. Without a proposed solution, the manager will feel that s/he needs to find a solution, which is not always ideal.
    4)Bring up only the 1 or 2 most important issues at the dinner. In that environment, any more than that stuff will be forgotten.

    Bring up issues that will matter to upper management. Don't bring up crap like "The IT Director wants all of us to partition our drives a certain way, but that is not always optimal". Bring up stuff that effect finances and/or employee morale.

    Finally, don't single out people for criticism ("My boss is an idiot!!"), but don't always hold back because you are afraid of the consequences. If your choose your actions based on fear of being trampled upon, then be prepared to always be trampled upon.

    Keep in mind that upper management sometimes does care about the company. If they don't know about problems, they can't fix them.

  16. Bad management team by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 5, Insightful

    When executive management has this type of meeting with the entire department it means they do not have confidence in their manager's ability to manage otherwise they wouldn't have (or need) the meeting. It's a sure sign of more serious problems within the company.

    As head of an IT department, it's my job to communicate the problems/concerns my staff bring to my attention that I can not address at my level. It is equally important for the staff to understand that, unless they are working for a charity, the object of the game is profit and they are there to make the company money (or at least not cost it as much). The value of a good management team is that this type of communication is natural and automatic.

  17. Re:What would be next? by TXG1112 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    As the previous poster says and my boss always tells me, emphasize all the things that are positive, and indicate how things could be even better.

    Upper management is always interested in improving things from a business perspective. It its very helpful if your suggestions have easily measurable value. Obvious cost savings, reduced development time, fewer support calls, additional services, etc... The improvements should be easily quantifiable and verifiable. Figure out how to say this in a few minutes. If they seem interested, you can follow up with an e-mail with additional detail.

    Ask yourself if you're looking for a forum to vent your grievances about your boss, your coworkers or the office politics. If you are then don't bother; it will only make things worse.

    --
    I will not be pushed, filed, stamped, indexed, briefed, debriefed, or numbered. My life is my own.
  18. Don't make a fist around a lit firecracker... by Fortunato_NC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If a firecracker explodes on your open palm, you'll get burned, but you'll probably recover. If you close your hand around it, the explosion will more than likely mangle your hand.

    It's similar when it comes to dealing with situations where you're dealing with senior managers. I don't know if your company is 50-80 people or your IT department is 50-80 people, but I assume you are anticipating some "face time" at this event. You're correct in assuming that the issues you bring up are going to be communicated back to your bosses. You'd be stupid to think otherwise. But a little tact goes a long way when it comes to speaking to your boss's boss. (or your boss's boss's boss)

    First, don't turn the conversation into a bitch session. The last thing you want is for the higher-ups in your company to think that all you can do is mope and complain. They'll remember it when the next round of downsizing comes along, and you'll be doing your moping and complaining on the unemployment line. Instead, maintain a generally positive attitude. If you can't do that, you work for the wrong company and need to move on, anyway.

    Second, frame the issues you wish to bring up in terms of opportunity instead of attacking individuals. Suppose your boss is a terrible communicator, and sends out project requests in short emails instead of discussing them with you and detailing specifications and requirements. Instead of:

    "I think Frank is a dickhead, because he sends curt one-line emails that simply bark orders."

    That's making a fist around a firecracker. Frank, regardless of how poor his communication skills might be, is going to be rightfully upset when that gem gets back to him through the grapevine. Instead, say:

    "I believe that our team would benefit from some training in business communication. Too often, we rely on short emails where more discussion and clarity is needed."

    I hope you see the difference. The issue is framed as one of communication, as opposed to a defect in Frank's personality. Similarly, instead of:

    "Our email server was down for four hours last week because Bob is too cheap to replace it."

    Try:

    I believe that productivity and uptime numbers would improve if we replaced our email server with more modern equipment.

    You might undergo some pain, especially if you are assigned the project of upgrading, replacing the email server, but nothing compared to what you'd experience if Bob felt like you were badmouthing him to his boss.

    Finally, speak about things you know. If you're the network admin, bring up issues related to the network. If you're a web monkey, bring up the web site. Don't just blast things you really have no business commenting on. You might feel like your company's sales team is a bunch of lying, egg-sucking weasels. Most sales teams are. But it's not related to your sphere of expertise, therefore it's not appropriate to address. Starting a war with another department is DEFINITELY grabbing a lit firecracker. And it may be more akin to lighting the firecracker and popping it in your mouth. Only, instead of a firecracker, you swallow a lit stick of dynamite. (Now, THAT is taking an analogy too far!)

    All too often, geeks take business issues personally, when there are often simple, business-related explanations. Bob isn't tormenting you with the crappy mailserver because he doesn't like you, he can't replace it until next year because the company spent $1 million bucks on yet another ERP/CRM upgrade. When you take things down a notch, and address the issues instead of the personalities, then it almost inevitably breeds a more positive tone. Frank may be a dickhead, or he may just be a techie who hasn't learned much about managing people.

    Third, don't try to solve all the world's problems in one night. You won't have the time. Pick some important issues, frame them as opportunities for improvem

    --
    Blogging Weight Loss, Distance Education, and more at verlin.com
  19. What I've learned as a manager by NtroP · · Score: 5, Insightful
    This is free advice, so you get what you pay for :-)

    Don't come to me with problems; come to me with solutions.

    If all you can do is give me a list of what is wrong, you're a whiner and I don't want to hear it. If, instead, you point out a problem and then offer a solution, I know you've taken ownership of the problem at least to the extent that you've given some thought to options. This generally means that you've considered more than one point of view - otherwise, it's hardly a solution.
    Provide the proper context.
    Often problems are discussed in isolation, so that even possible solutions appear to be disproportionate to the original problem. By framing the problem and the solutions in light of their relavance to the ultimate goal or direction of the (company/department/project/etc.) it can lend better perspective. When viewed in the right light, problems that don't affect others (but who's solutions would), might be considered more seriously. You may also find that it's simply an annoyance to you and, when placed in perspective isn't worth mentioning - especially in this venue.
    Move the conversation forward.
    If the horse is dead, stop beating it... Pay attention to how your suggestions are being received. If now is not the time, you should pick up on signals to that affect; move on. Don't keep comming back to the same old rant. This is politics, not a technical problem. If you sense you're losing your audience, don't piss them off. Work the problem out later through your chain of command. If it's really that important, put it in a memo.
    Focus on the positives
    OK, that seems trite, but it's true. I'm much more willing to pay attention to you if you have good things to say. If everytime I talk to you, you come off negative, I'm more apt to chalk your current rant up to just more complaining. Some people are never satisfied, and I have bigger fish to fry. I don't know how many times I've heard "You should ask for it. If I ask, we'll never get it." Well, duh. If everytime I turned around, I was complaining and asking someone else to solve my problems, I'd expect to be blown off too. I have a reputation for asking for very little, so when I do ask, I'm taken seriously.
    Network first
    Like I said earlier, this is politics. First impressions are important. Take that into consideration at this first meeting. Perhaps keeping this meeting very positive will earn a little karma that you can burn later. Geeks tend to view problems from a technical perspective and forget the human side of things. Don't burn your bridges by coming on too strong right from the beginning. Perhaps making a point of saying that you feel a follow-up meeting might be a better place to discuss specifics will show you as being aware and considerate.
    When it comes down to it though, you know your company and coworkers better that we do, and must act accordingly. Some tactics may work at one company, but would be totaly inapproprate at another.
    --
    "terrorism" and "pedophilia" are the root passwords to the Constitution
    1. Re:What I've learned as a manager by Moraelin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Sounds like the kind of manager that I hate. What's wrong with your points? Lemme see:

      "Don't come to me with problems; come to me with solutions."

      You know what? Then what is _your_ job? Sounds to me like just another lame filter to avoid work.

      If, just as an example, I say that the mail server is unreliable and slow, we simply have a problem. Maybe, not being said server's admin, I do not know what should be done to it. But I do know that emails are lost, or arrive hours too late.

      Would you prefer that instead of talking to you, I leave my work and go personally track down the email server admin (in the other end of town!) and work out a solution? Worse yet, would you prefer that 100 people independently go talk to said e-mail admin, because they have to have a solution before they can talk to you? How many lost hour for them _and_ for that admin does that tally up to?

      Here's an idea for you: the whole reason to have a chain of command and well defined responsibilities is precisely to avoid screw-ups like that. Your job as a manager is precisely to solve problems, or forward or delegate them to the apropriate people. Not just to sit there and wait for other people to figure out the solutions for you.

      Briefly: if we're to come up with our own solutions to everything, we don't need _you_ at all.

      "Provide the proper context."

      Yet another lame work-avoiding filter.

      Again, it's _your_ job to know the whole context, not mine. _That_ is why you're the boss, and I'm a coding monkey. _That_ is why I'd rather stay a coding monkey. Because being a proper boss really means hard work.

      Work which obviously you're not willing to do.

      For me to learn the proper context, including long term corporate goals, politics, and business relations, means already taking a break from my real work and researching all that. More than 90% of that stuff is totally useless to me.

      Already requiring _one_ person to do _your_ work for free and research that context, is plain waste of man-hours. Requiring _everyone_ to keep track of all that before they can even talk to you, is downright surrealistic.

      Again, that's why we have managers: so only _one_ person needs to know the bigger picture, while the rest of the team can work on their own slice. If we all need to stay up to date on everything up to corporate goals and strategies, and be able to come up with coherent strategies that fit those, then we don't need _you_.

      "Move the conversation forward."

      To some extent good advice. However, often there just is a problem. A big real problem. Just because you don't want to hear it, doesn't mean it'll go away.

      So maybe, to use a real example, if the whole bloody team comes to you repeatedly to say "this application server is CRAP. Please, please, please, can we use something else?"... you could actually do your job, and investigate. See if there really is a problem and how big.

      Locking yourself up in an ivory tower and chalking it up as "everyone's a whiner, and they don't know when to move the conversation forward" is just plain incompetence in that context.

      "Focus on the positives"

      In other words: "only say what I want to hear." Then you can stay cozily in your office and think everything is just fine and dandy, while the project is heading head first to a disaster.

      Everyone only told you the shiny happy positive fantasy that you wanted to hear. Too bad the reality wasn't even remotely like that, eh?

      "Network first"

      In other words: instead of doing your job and seeing if you do have a problem to solve, you'll focus on if you like someone enough to bother listening to them. Lame.

      The biggest problem with that kind of approach, is that most people learn what's expected from them. If being the boss's personal brown-noser (a.k.a., thorougly "networking" and "focusing on the positives") is what pays more than being a good competent professional, that's the kind of people you end up with.

      So you end up with a team of total incompetents. Programmers who can't program, Unix admins with no Unix experience, and web designers who don't know HTML. But, by Jove, they're _good_ at networking with the boss and telling him shiny happy positive lies.

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  20. My Experiences by gavinjolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    In my experience Management believe that throwing money at hardware or software will fix their problems. Or better yet we will outsource. The basic things they seem to forget or have not learned are:

    • Buying new CRM software is a bad idea if your problems stem from your Customer Service staff failing to identify existing customers because they are too lazy leading to thousands of duplicate records
    • METADATA is a process not a single step solution. You can have greate Metadata software but if noone uses it or enters crap data why bother
    • You need a Thesaurus with your Metadata solution if you are serious
    • To provide a quality solution you first need to identify the problem including if that highlights how bad things are at present
    • VENDORS WILL LIE TO SELL THEIR WARES. Who here has had to implement a crap solution because the manager bought direct from the vendor without consideration (usually to integration, usability and TCO)
    • Data is a corporate asset that has value. I have just recommendeed to my manager at a former employer to get their data valued as a corporate asset. This is a last ditch desperate effort to stop a specific manager from buying ANOTHER lemon that will have detrimental effects on said Asset. The last lemon he provided did the following:
      • Provided a solution with less features
      • Provided no security. The vendor provided a word document with instructions in how to set up an ODBC source (to Informix on Unix - Tru64). The document listed the username (informix) and password that had full rights. Anyone with this could drop production tables, databases at a whim. I later discovered the individual usernames had the same rights as the application would not run with security turned on.
      • Database logging could not be turned on as it broke the application. We were not sure why this was the case but it did. Dont worry, it was only a financial system for the main source of revenue for a Local Government organisation.
      • Introduced IT to the vendor with the WORST service they had ever encountered (in 20+ years experience)
      • The worst UI we had EVER SEEN
      • Poor process controls. The tables still had the fields for Coupons (someone explained this was a leftover from when the application ran on a mainframe)
      • Little or no user documentation and NO SA documentation. I was told the Users Group provided more real support than the vendor
      • 56 patches in 60 days a number that broke the system when tested. Need I say any more

      Most management decisions are made out of ignorance and head burying so the existing problems are not known in the hope all symptoms will remain hidden.

    --

    The weathers here - Wish you were beautiful

  21. my advice by CAIMLAS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I have a professor (who is quite excellent) who usedto work for a large telecommunications company as an executive prior to his retirement. I've spent a large amount of time talking to him, and I think I'm fairly certain I know what he would recommend, or at least something similar to what he himself would have done in such a situation. :) He currently works as a business efficiency expert for contract.

    If you're going to say anything at all, don't waste your breath being petty or mentioning minor instances of complaints. Cut right to the thick of the matter, and give him your assessment and the logic behind your assessment. Preferably, have a writeup/short report (one or two pages) to hand him for later peruseal with well-outlined points. Don't mention names, but point him in the right direction so that he doesn't feel like he's bringing the axe down on your recommendations, but on his 'own' decision - which he somehow reached after your carefully worded suggestion.

    If there is a sizeable group of people, break the concerns up amongst you. Get together at a bar or somewhere a couple days prior to the dinner, get a list, and then distribute the list amongst willing contributors, so that no one person gets the heat. It would be incredibly stupid for anyone short of the president to try and pull down heat on a group of that size.

    If you catch heat from middle management afterwards, guess what? That just means that they're pissed tha the president is making changes based on your apt suggestions. If he revokes priviledges/perks or fires you, write off a little letter to the president letting hiim know what happened. that middle management will likely be looking for a job soon, too. Then see if you can't get the president to be a job reference. :)

    The ability to see and try to solve real (as opposed to created)problems is a valueable ability to have, and a very valueable asset for any company; if they ignore that asset, you're best off looking for a job, because truely, your position there isn't secure in the least - the company isn't likely terribly secure, if they punish real problem solving.

    --
    ~/ssh slashdot.org ssh: connect to host slashdot.org port 22: too many beers
  22. Re:It bit me... by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 4, Insightful
    It's important to understand several things when going into this type of meeting:

    What is the real objective? Specifically... are they trying to cut back staff or unsuccessful projects? Or, is it an "enlightened" approach of trying to make best use of the company's resources?

    How many layers up in the command structure are you talking to? Technical people are often better at discussing technical problems, rather than people problems.

    What is your biggest issue, or what do you see as being the biggest opportunity that you can help the company with? If it is a negative issue, be careful in how you phrase it. NEVER make personal attacks.

    ...and when you have to say something bad, make sure there is enough backup for why THIS is the thing that must change.

    Whenever possible, you should speak with the person you are going to attack beforehand about the issue. Then, you have an opportunity to spin the issue in both your favor: _ and I had a discussion last week about how we could work better together...

    One of my favorite lines is that I work with a fantastic team, and I really value the different skills and capabilities that everybody brings to the table. I am thankful that (that bastard middle manager) is around so that I am able to offload some of the politics (or whatever), but [insert organizational issue here].

  23. Terms of MONEY by macdaddy · · Score: 4, Insightful
    You have to break it down into terms of money. Green backs, dinero, Franklin's, etc. That's the ONLY thing a suit can relate to. For example you have to show them that switching from GroupWise and NT to Linux on your desktops and servers will save them X in licensing costs, Y in support costs, and Z in pain and suffering. They can only relate to money. Don't stray from that mindset. Everything has to be related to $$. If you can't show how a problem is costing the suits $$ in their fleece-lined suit pockets, they won't give a damn.

    Keep it simple. Don't overwhelm them with technical details. If you see their eyes glaze over, you're providing them too much detail. Keep the answers short and concise. Give the suits the summary of the summary of the Cliff Notes for Dummies of the summary on the back of the paperback edition #2. I mean you have to eliminate almost all detail. Make them ask you for more detail BUT don't abuse it with too much detail when you do give them more. This is like the first date. Scratch that. This is you making the phone call that arranges the date. Scratch that. This is the wink that gets you the number to call. You can't give them too much detail or 1) you're scare them away, and 2) they'll already know everything about you (the project) and won't need you anymore. KISS-FSP. Keep It Simple Stupid, For Stupid People.

    Don't be afraid to share problems. If you're in a job that you feel you can't share a problem with management then you're in the wrong job. Pack up and move out. Believe me, it's not worth the grief. You shouldn't have to watch your back for the next inbound sharpened object. Grow a set and lay it on the line.

    Anyhow, that's my $.02 before taxes. Best of luck.

  24. Re:In THIS economy? by bolthole · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You make two bad assumptions:

    1. management can recognize the truely qualified, and keep them, while ditching the "bad" ones

    2. truely qualified IT people, are also really good at selling themselves

    Both are commonly false.

  25. you've got to be kidding!? by hellraizr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    been there done that. to be honest ya wanna know what happens when this takes place? the VP looses his job, his replacement comes in on a "clean-slate" basis and replaces all of upper management siting that "our current staff can not adapt to our technology needs". in the end you end up loosing all your good connections in the company getting replaced by green-horns with MCSE's and no real world experience trying to convert your "legacy" (about to move to linux) network to the *latest tech* windows system. FUCKING TRUST ME I'VE BEEN THERE 4 DAMN TIMES!!!

    is a damn plague where I live. PLEASE IT GUYS do not enlighten your exec's to your job. it works SOO much better when they only know enough to quote laptop prices and say "hey, can I use XP?"

    I speak from YEARS of experience here. please no -1 troll mod. I really am serious (although a bit jaded due to my loosing 2 jobs on this subject, but bailing from another 2 because of the patternistic behavior).

    you're better off backing your IT manager in a corner and trully explaining to him/her how things are and letting them talk to the exec's than hearing it from the geeks. if you do it I swear unless you hold a Ph.D in bullshit you will only end up making things worse. as the poster said it shows the minor problems with a company that can seem massive to an exec but are a daily routine for an IT professional. it's just not wise to report such things to mangement.

    On the real, your IT director/manager is there for you. if you look bad he does. and in most situations your manager is newer than you so image is a big thing. make him look good by explaining to him the problems and time lines for repair/completion and use his purported skills to improve your image. thats why there is a layer between IT and management (although we all know we are like -1 link behind the CEO as we _ALL_ do massive favors for them).

    trust me guys/gals, been there done that. I hope someone can back me up on this.

    I know all situations will not be like this but trust me on this one, experience is a mutha. . . seen it soo many times I wanted to puke when reading this article just from bad memories. Remember PHB's will always be PHB's. You can teach them untill your blue in the face and they'll still ask 'why did my computer lock up after opening that attachment from that person that said "ILOVEYOU"?'

    1. Re:you've got to be kidding!? by skotte · · Score: 3, Insightful

      well, okay, so i wonder what kinds of things you were telling your boss. did you go in and cuss em out with a 50 page tome of places they may "shove it" or something?

      still, i agree with you. to be more precise, i fFine tune your point. i had a boss explain to me that he in fFact did not want to know what was wrong. he wanted to know everything was okay. he, as a manager, had a lot of responisibility, and wanted some reassurance that all things were going okay. this had very little to do with things going actually okay, and related more to things being under control, well in hand, and all systems go. in effect, the boss wanted to ask me "how's everything?" and he wanted me to say "damn skippy sharp as a tack!" he didnt give a fFig about how things were going.

      and really, should he *care* about how things are going? does the boss have any real capacity to change anything? course not. that's your job. so if you say "the wisgets are giving me a hard time and the wingnuts are a little rusty", you think he cares? course not. he cant do a thing about it. that's your job. that's what you are being paid fFor.

      the boss really only has the ability to change staffing lineups. if the problem is with staff, do bring it up. elsewise, don't bother.