Slashdot Mirror


Morpheus Infiltrates Other P2P Networks

An anonymous reader writes "Morpheus was the number one post-Napster P2P app until Sharman Networks took over KaZaa and got them bumped off the FastTrack network. Now Morpheus is back on FastTrack, according to MP3NewsWire, tapping into it and the other leading networks through a beta of the NEOnet technology in the just-released version 4. Thomas Mennecke over at Slyck speaks more about it with Michael Weiss, CEO of StreamCast Networks." prostoalex also points to a ZDNet article discussing this new version of Morpheus, and notes the Download.com warning that: "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

61 of 300 comments (clear)

  1. good... by mr_tommy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Doesn't this mean now that the RIAA only has to download one program when they want to find file swappers and what not?
    Morpheus always seemed to look a bit dated aswell..

  2. So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Morpheus got back in the Matrix? Any word on Neo?

    1. Re:So.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is from here that we broadcast our pirate signal, and hack into Kazaa.

    2. Re:So.... by AntiOrganic · · Score: 3, Funny

      RTFA, it discusses the NEOnet technology.

    3. Re:So.... by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      Nobody suspects the butterfly. Muhuwahahahahaha.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
  3. Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If Morpheus wants to capture a big share of the product market and really make a stand, it should do two things which I believe are critical:

    A successful 3rd generation P2P program should;

    a) Either have no spy-ware or, if necessary, do it out in the open. List each program that is in use, what it is recording, and remove it on an uninstall. It's one thing to have advertising and tracking information: its another to pull a Sherman and hide it all (and then !deny all when they get caught)

    b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

    Put in these two features and your program can be competitive on any server (particularly ALL servers)

    1. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by bano+(O_o) · · Score: 3, Funny

      i'll add a "porn tag" on files, so you can find/avoid it.. I'm tired of these : [ 1] Donkey Rugrats en Paris - DVD [ 2] Donkey Rugrats a Paris - DVD Rip x [ 3] Donkey Paris Hilton (Full and Real).mpg [ 4] Donkey Paris Hilton (Full and Real).mpg [ 5] Donkey Rugrats_Paris.avi [ 6] Donkey Rugrats en Paris - DVD Rip x ... Rugrats, rugrats everywhere!!! The world has gone crazy!

    2. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 4, Insightful

      b) Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA. Check files, particularly MP3s, for filler, or repetitions of strings (the usual cause of noise on fake MP3s). Make users able to chose the actual content that they are after. Perhaps also blacklisting of unreliable users from a user level?

      In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright.

      I tell you what, why don't you write such an app with such a filter and see how long it takes for RIAA and the courts to come down on you like a ton of bricks for deliberately designing a tool that a) stops them from posting their own material, whilst, b) helping people infringe on their copyrights as easily as possible.

      Writing a P2P application isn't against the law, but I bet designing a P2P application that uses such measures to intentionally block RIAA (or any other copyright holder) from trying to track down individuals that are wantonly infringing on their copyrights will be severely frowned upon by the courts.

      Contrary to what you might believe, you don't have a right to infringe on copyrights. And the Napster, etc court decisions decided you can't use the "unlimited friends" defence to protect your ass. If you want the latest Britney Spears/Eminem/Outkast/whoever CD then you can pay for it.

      Now watch me get flamed to hell and back by half of Slashdot nation. Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    3. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Bob9000 · · Score: 3, Funny
      Would you mind answering a few questions for this nice man from the RIAA?

      (how many these confessions does slashdot have logged...jesus people...)

      --
      Those whose signatures threaten negative moderation will be modded down.
    4. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 3, Insightful

      "In other words, make it as simple as possible for you to infringe on someone else's copyright."

      Actually, no. This makes it even easier to prevent copyright infringement, its all about who controls the blacklists. Really though, these features are just useful, just like a gun is useful. Whether its used for 'good' or for 'bad' is all perspective, but either way its got use.

      "Like I care about karma: if I did I wouldn't be writing this post, would I?" As someone who hit the karma cap with 'goatse.cx' in their name, I can tell you this is the typical counterculture troll that gets modded insightful by the same people that listen to Limp Bizkit. (this now being the counter-counter-culture troll that gets +3 informative, but then -4 for this amendment.)

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    5. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by the+bluebrain · · Score: 5, Funny

      I dunno ... I think it'd be funny to see a subpoena for one "Mr. Coward, Anonymous"

      ...or does /. log IPs?

      --
      yes, we have no bananas
    6. Re: Two keys for any successful new P2P client by Black+Parrot · · Score: 5, Funny


      > Have some sort of way to filter out the fake files put out by record companies and the RIAA.

      You mean, the stuff they try to pass off as music these days?

      --
      Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
    7. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by MrSpiff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so basically emule?

      a) it's opensource.

      b) it generates checksums for files, making it easy for sites such as sharereactor.com and shareconnector.com to offer quality-assured releases.

    8. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by SlashDread · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Writing a P2P application isn't against the law, but I bet designing a P2P application that uses such measures to intentionally block RIAA (or any other copyright holder) from trying to track down individuals that are wantonly infringing on their copyrights will be severely frowned upon by the courts."

      So you want to be flamed to hell? Well, I wont bite.

      Ill just rip your argument to bits.

      You are basically saying it is legal for a "copyright holder" to null the privacy of "non copyright holders".

      Im glad to inform you: privacy is NOT designed for exclusive use by "copyright holders"

      And some other newsflash for you: Not all downloading infringes copyright. Under Dutch law Im am totally legally able to download music WHICH I ALREADY OWN A LEGAL COPY OFF.

      Please, get of your high-moral horse, and start paying attention to the REAL issues (fair use, privacy, and IMHO overly long copyright terms.)

      peace

      "/Dread"

    9. Re:Two keys for any successful new P2P client by illuvata · · Score: 2

      ...or does /. log IPs?
      yes, and it doesn't matter if you post as AC or not.

      then again, i guess the average /.er is supposed to know about proxies

  4. Hrmm by acehole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I wonder what the size of the profit they reap from spyware?

    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your eating habits, deliver doomsday predictions, collect the neighbours paper, or may leave an unpleasant taste in your mouth."

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  5. Unsafe Client? by Mork29 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Doesn't Kazaa do these things anyway?

  6. "Third-party applications" my ass... by kcbrown · · Score: 5, Insightful
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Why would anybody ever download something bundled with the crap referred to here, much less install it? Such "third-party applications" make the main product worse than useless.

    I'm surprised there isn't a completely open-source, distributed P2P filesharing application widely available to people. Such a thing, when advertised as been spyware/adware-free, would likely be a huge hit. But I guess the "distributed" problem is a tough one, and it's the only way to avoid having to host some sort of master server (which would be expensive).

    BitTorrent is probably the closest thing we have so far, but it doesn't provide an index or anything along those lines...

    --
    Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
    1. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by ameoba · · Score: 4, Informative

      Hrmm... if only such a thing existed and was compatable with another major client's network.

      --
      my sig's at the bottom of the page.
    2. Re:"Third-party applications" my ass... by CrystalChronicles · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, it's not. and it's been shut down by the makers of Kazaa using the evil DMCA.

  7. Hmmhmm... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 5, Informative
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    Who cares?

  8. What spyware ? by DennisZeMenace · · Score: 4, Interesting
    'Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings.'

    The answer to spyware ? Two words: "Reverse Snapshot".


    Long live VMWare.


    DZM

  9. legal? by Dreadlord · · Score: 5, Informative

    TFA starts:

    Morpheus 4 is Here and Legal

    Morpheus 4 is here and legal - "the only American file-sharing software ruled legal by a U.S. federal court," its owner StreamCast Networks boasts.


    But never says why and how, further more, how is it legal and supports FastTrack network at the same time?

    Anyway, FastTrack isn't the network it used to be, the quality of its files is getting worse and worse, many times you'll download something to find out that it was something else but renamed, I've switched to eDonkey long time ago, much better file quality, yes it's slower, but that is just fine with me as long as the file quality is OK.

    It's much harder to share fake files in eDonkey anyway, because of the file hashing and voting system.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:legal? by julesh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      how is it legal and supports FastTrack network at the same time?

      It is perfectly legal to use the FastTrack network without authorisation from Sharman... they don't own the computers that constitute the network, they just own the software that is usually used to run it.

      If you write your own re-implementation by reverse engineering KaZaA to determine how it works, that is perfectly legal. For the same reason that, for instance, Wine is a perfectly legal piece of software.

      So, basically, Morpheus has a re-implementation of FastTrack from scratch.

      What is possibly a little concerning is that it appears to be a download-only implementation...

    2. Re:legal? by Dreadlord · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't know much about how files are identified over FastRack, but I think that the way files are hashed and identified over eDonkey works just fine, and the voting system of Kazaa is weird, you are able to vote only for your own files as excellent/average/poor, so those who share fake files will tag them as excellent anyway.

      In eDonkey clients, your vote for the file is based on the hash value, so when you download a file flagged as non-fake, you can be sure that it's not fake, otherwise you can simply vote for fake and so everyone else knows so.

      --
      The IT section color scheme sucks.
    3. Re:legal? by geminidomino · · Score: 2, Informative

      IIRC, KazaaLite *WAS* the Kazaa software, it just replaced the Malware DLL files with "Dummy" DLLs that contained (what were effectively) noops instead of the spying code. It wasn't rewritten, it was just patched and redistributed (effectively Warez)

  10. Increased network traffic? by boer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Some 70 to 80 per cent of Internet traffic is already P2P related. I wonder if a sizable portion of this is pure query traffic. I would assume that applications such this one that support multiple networks would be cause for increased query traffic all around. Therefore in my opinion it's hard to say if this development is a good thing at all.

    --
    (This sig intentionally left blank)
    1. Re:Increased network traffic? by McDutchie · · Score: 2, Funny
      Some 70 to 80 per cent of Internet traffic is already P2P related.
      In other news, some 90 to 100 per cent of statistics are made up on the spot.
  11. MUTE 0.2.1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    January 21 MUTE 0.2.1 was released.

    http://mute-net.sourceforge.net/

    Jan 7 slashdot posting about MUTE 0.2

    Changes includes mention of a time out problem in win32 version fixed. I hope that also reduces the tendency for MUTE to abort downloads.

    It may be a bit wobbley in these early stages, but it's anonymous and doesn't install spyware and crap. Worth supporting if only by running it so there are more active nodes.

  12. it's not spyware, honest guv! by Arathrael · · Score: 4, Informative

    The user comments at download.com have more mention of the apparent spyware - to quote one comment:'The claim by the program vendor that this software is free of Spyware is utterly ridiculus. I installed it on a fresh install of Windows XP Pro. It installed "Websavings by Ebates" without the option to opt out.' But then, maybe that's just intrusive adware and not technically spyware - not being familiar with this ebates doobrey I wouldn't know.

    On the RIAA comment, the download.com blurb states that 'Morpheus protects your privacy with integrated access to public proxy networks.' But I'm a bit skeptical about that myself.

  13. Please spy on me... by zakezuke · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's always been a mystory to me how to actually become a participant in the Nielsen ratings system. If 3rd generation p2p apps with spyware actually fed back information as to what I was downloading and watching... I would think that would be most spiffy, well except for that whole MPAA RIAA thing, but ignore that for a moment.

    I for one would be perfectly willing to submit what I watched in the hopes that it would improve its ratings, so long as the process didn't lag down my system. I would also be perfectly willing to live with comercial content if it paid for the media.

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  14. RIAA by ArbiterOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just face it... P2P isn't going away. P2P clients are like Whack-A-Mole: As soon as you smack (sue, crash, buy out, whatever) one, three more pop up.
    So, RIAA, do like the government strategy : If you can't beat 'em, join 'em.
    I'm waiting for the RIAA 'official' P2P network that allows record labels to profit from the spyware ads on a user's machine. Not like I'd use it, but... it's a better (and more profitable) idea than suing 15-year-olds. And it makes the RIAA look like the good guy!

  15. Re:Virtual machine by Deusy · · Score: 2, Funny

    I don't run Linux. I get paid to write Windows apps, I play and write DirectX stuff in my spare time, and when I'm not doing that I'm making music using Windows sequencers. Let me know when I can write and play decent games, use cubase and make a living from writing code under Linux and I'll take another look at tedious hard disk issues.

    Dude, it's now 2004 not 1994. Where have you been all these years?

    --

    Free Gamer - Free games list and commentary

  16. P2P App recommendations? by CdBee · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently saw "Poisoned" being used on a Mac OSX box and it brought home to me the generally sucky nature of P2P on Windows I had been using KaZaA + DietK but switched to a recent build of KaZaAliteK++ which is much leaner and more friendly, but can't match Poisoned's multinetwork, spyware-and-adware-free smoothness Which P2P apps would /.ers recommend for the Windows platform?

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  17. so what? by trotzki · · Score: 5, Informative

    Discussion is already up on the MLdonkey Lists about possible infringement of the MLDonkey GPL License.

    MLdonkey connects to all kinds of Networks, as Edonkey, Overnet , Bittorrent , Gnutella, Gnutella2 and Fasttrack and that seems where the Morpheus NEOWhateverTech (insert your favourite marketing-droid-speak here) code comes from.
    BTW, apart from being GPL and from being written for linux originally, MLdonkey gives you a nifty web-interface which lets you search and download (at home) all sorts of stuff while hanging out at the office :-)

  18. there is no emoticon for what i'm feeling! by halofourteen731 · · Score: 2, Informative

    i actually dled and installed it cause access to a bunch of nws sounded good and i figured i could just remove any spyware. plus here is an actual quote from the beginning of the licence agreement: "Morpheus values your anonymity and privacy. Morpheus does not contain or bundle malicious spyware." THE FUCK IT DOES. In addition to the My Search bar, Ebates, and BroadcastPC it admits to installing it has 3 or 4 other progs plus an ad window and popup ad thingy built into the gui. most of this shit runs in the backround and doesn't show up in the processes or services lists. thank god for adaware and spybot sd and fuck morheus. i'm sticking with Azureus (a BT client)

  19. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by ymgve · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Soo...let me see if I get this right. You attempted to download an operating system kernel from an untrusted p2p source? You should just be glad you didn't get another kind of backdoor action...

  20. Living amongst the pirates... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Does anyone else think that all these references to the Matrix movie are just some lame attempt at getting attention by wanna-be-popular 15 year olds? How about all the people who got +5 funny for mentioning the Matrix and didn't get that they were admitting that they didn't get the joke but thought that it was clever? Sigh.

    And Next on Slashdot, 3l3T3_h4k3r_20x6 releases his newest P2P app: Trinity.</kidding>

    P2P was a neat concept way back when it was called a bulletin board. I guess it still is a neat concept, now that we have IM for sharing snapshots and web-camera streams. The truth, however, is that it isn't nearly as effective in pushing around bits as administering a cheap Linux box with 200GB of HD off a cable modem with a bunch of college frat buddies.

    Moreover, it isn't nearly as good as having a private server with 500+GB of storage on a college LAN... I lost count after the 5th HD was added to my frat's file server. Dues in a frat house go to the 60"HDTV, game systems, parties (It's all about the Super Bowl), and the file server "as needed". As long as you meter/throttle the bandwidth so that the file sharing outbound network doesn't spike the University's network admin's attention (or better yet, have a student network admin in your frat), bandwidth consumption looks just like a massive Quake (or other FPS) game. Match that to the right port for Quake, etc, and even the best sysadmins are fooled.

    Lest you think that this is too paranoid, I have a colleague who only traded audio or video on his private 10/100 ethernet switch which was behind a Linksys NAT/firewall from his dorm room's connection (he graduated recently). In these days of IPods and USB2 devices, a portable 200GB HD can be filled up pretty quick. They cost less than $200 for a USB2 200GB drive.

    Another friend started using NetFlix recently, and copying the DVDs to DVD-Rs (they are even cheaper at $1 per 4.5GB in bulk).

    A recent alum halfway around the world shares popular series like Farscape or Carnivale in DivX. One of our friends likes to encode the director's comments and such when he rips DVDs. Others go for the make-it-fit-in-700MB VCD. These are all private networks with strong encryption. Having a "P2P network" of geeky college aged friends with a central file store provides orders and orders of magnitude the bandwidth and security from being caught.

    I'm not saying that I don't purchase media (now that I live on my own, I do have a cable subscription). But when I go back to the house on the weekend, there's a good selection of media.

    Let me just say that DRM doesn't work, and neither does software activation. People don't rip crappy stuff. All my friends buy content (CDs, MP3s, DVDs, etc) when it suits them. Busting all my friends would be nice for the MPAA, RIAA, or BSA, but lets just face it, that's not going to happen, because this content is on private devices. The wire taps required to even discover the shared content aren't legal, and aren't practical (go ahead and try to wire tap my dorm's P2P WEP protected 802.11g WiFi network). The answer is to provide the content at high quality on demand over that broadband channel. TV does this, with the exception of the on-demand part. At 3AM, though, if I want to watch Farscape season 2 episode 4, that's what I want to watch with no commercials at DVD or DivX quality.

    It's a good thing we live next to a guy with an open WiFi network. I might be afraid to post something like this from my home network logged in with my user name... You can trace this message off a few bounces into some poor guy's closet, and if you get the IP address, then it may or may not have been changed since his network seems to be going down regularly (see related thread on RIAA lawsuits).

  21. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Geheimagent · · Score: 2, Informative
    Soo...let me see if I get this right. You attempted to download an operating system kernel from an untrusted p2p source? You should just be glad you didn't get another kind of backdoor action...

    If you have the md5 or sha1 hash of the file/iso from the original source (validated by a gpg signature) that's perfectly save and helpes saving bandwidth on the original servers.

  22. Command line by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Whats the best UNIX command line based p2p application out there? In an ideal world if there was a web interface for it too then that would be much better.

    I can't run a windows or a Linux GUI application, hence the question.

    Can anyone suggest anything?

    Many thanks

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Command line by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative

      giFT, I think. Consists of a server (can connect to OpenFT, Gnutella, Fasttrack, Soulseek, etc, at varying success rate) that does the downloading, and a client that can be on remote host as well if desired. The best client for it just happens to be giFTcurs, a console app...

  23. Illegal item breaks in illegally by redhawk1044 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't funny how an application that distributes mp3 illegally is now breaking into other applications that do the same thing, which instead of doing only one illegal action it is now doing two

  24. Re:Is FastTrack network same as the old Linux KaZa by neko9 · · Score: 2, Informative

    MLdonkey is open source and supports not only donkey but fasttrack, bittorent, soulseek, dc, gnutella, gnutella2, overnet, opennap networks too. u can use it with many guis and from console.

  25. People still use P2P? by localghost · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I wasn't aware of anything you couldn't get over BitTorrent. Why would you mess with spyware-ridden software and risk getting subpoenaed by the RIAA for slow download rates and fake files?

  26. Re:Uhm, so? by Zog+The+Undeniable · · Score: 2, Insightful
    AFAIK Kazaa Lite will also be kicked off FastTrack following the latest Kazaa upgrade, which KL can't follow because the lawyers have shut it down.

    These things go in fashions - Napster lost it and Kazaa probably will too. People will use whatever is easiest, safest and has the most files, and if the major pirates^H^H^H^H^H^H^H sharers hated spyware and were using KL, they'll up sticks and move to eDonkey or whatever when KL gets switched off. The effort of doing so is negligible.

    --
    When I am king, you will be first against the wall.
  27. Re:Theft by mikechant · · Score: 3, Insightful

    OK I'll bite. Copyright violation *is not theft*. Find me a piece of legislation (not an RIAA press release) that says it is and I'll buy you a large virtual drink... Morally speaking, in your universe it may be theft. But not in most people's. Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to). If you can honestly say that more than a small percentage will agree that you're a thief, then I think you're deluded. So: If you do it, then you *are* morally a thief since you believe yourself to be. The rest of us aren't.

  28. I used to love Morpheus until... by Trolling4Dollars · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...I found IRC. Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked (mostly recorded TV shows that I missed like Sliders, Enterprise, Voyager, etc...).

    Now this?
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    When the average person ELECTS to use something even after reading this warning, you can be assured that the Internet has really and truly become McNet. (McDonald's reference for those of you unfamiliar with it) Hmmm... now that I think about it, it sounds like the Microsoft EULA, and plenty of people accept that every day. ;P

    A sad day indeed. A sad, sad day...

    1. Re:I used to love Morpheus until... by zerocool^ · · Score: 2, Informative

      ...I found IRC.

      IRC has been around much longer than any modern p2p network. IRC was ancient when I started using it in 1999, when napster came out. IRC was what people used to suppliment their ftp downloading.

      Of course now that many of the IRC operators have banned file xfers, it's a lot harder to find the things I liked

      IRC ops can't ban file transfers, as far as I know. File transfers with clients such as mirc are direct client to client (DCC, also could be called p2p). That's why all the kiddie pr0n stuff is on IRC - it's sick, but no one stops it because no files ever actually transfer across an IRC network. The only thing IRC networks transfer is text.

      Now, I know you're trolling, but at least be more subtle about it.

      ~Will

      --
      sig?
  29. Re:Theft by Kosi · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The amount of thievery...right to steal.

    Hey, this is an article about filesharing! Who do you think steals (=takes away, so someone does not have something he had before) what from whom and how does it relate to the article?

  30. Impressions.. by pangel83 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I had installed it in my desktop two days ago and I can't say that I was impressed. ----I know that it is still beta----, put it has a lot of way to go! -It uses the mldonkey fasttrack plugin in order to connect to the kazaa network... Hmmm... doesn't this mean that they should provide source or something? Correct me if I am wrong -User interface is awful!! Big ugly graphic buttons and I have the impression that I didn't see any proper menu bar. Of course, there is a ad-box in an uncomortable position taking up a whole strip of the screen just in order to display an ad in the middle. At least kazaa ads to not take up a whole row (There are the play-stop-etc buttons next to them) - There is no way to see the peers you are connecting to (At least that was my impression after the 20min. period that it had the honour of being installed in my machine) -UI was slow on my P4 3ghz, 1gb ram (!) -It crashed.

  31. Re:Theft by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Deal with it. Boycott or abstain, but overpricing doesn't give you any legal or moral right to steal.

    Moral rights are determined by self.

  32. What about OpenFT by Assassin_for_Atari · · Score: 3, Informative

    In all this talk about a "open" protocol and client that doesn't have spyware, Im suprised that I never hear /.'ers talk about OpenFT/giFT client. I had been using it regularly but constant changes to the protocol and server updates made me look else where. Even though this was a problem I'm supprised there isn't a bigger community pushing giFT and there efforts to help make it a solid product. I noticed they have more clients and one that works with windows now (cross plat is good). Like I said its been awhile since I used it but at the time I loved it. After reading this post I revisted their site and it looks like they are making progress so Im assuming that they have a some what more stable protocol that doesn't get changed all the time. I think ./'ers should either take a look at it or give it another try like I AM!

  33. Re:Theft by pyros · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to).

    That isn't copyright violation in the U.S.. It's called Fair Use and is protected by law. It's why recordable [audio] CDs and tapes have a levy on them which goes to the R.I.A.A.. The difference between doing that and downloading over the internet is that there is a limit imposed due to physical proximity which is only overcome by paying to ship the media to your friend. You must also pay for the media. Downloading over the internet removes these two key points which led the courts to declare such usage legal in the first place.


    So now that I've given an analysis on the differences between the two (physical sharing vs. online sharing) with respect to how the courts view them, please stop trying to justify online infringement by citing Fair Use.

  34. Vmware. hehe. woot! by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Third-party applications bundled with this download may record your surfing habits, deliver advertising, collect private information, or modify your system settings."

    And my third party software (VMWare) inside which I run your little programs on a dedicated image with nothing on it but P2P programs doesn't really care. Spy away.

  35. Re:Theft by revery · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Moral rights are determined by self.

    Then you'd better hope that you don't run into someone who thinks murder is ok...

    --
    Was it the sheep climbing onto the altar, or the cattle lowing to be slain,
    or the Son of God hanging dead and bloodied on a cross that told me this was a world condemned, but loved and bought with blood.

  36. Open source alternative KCeasy by havaloc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    KCeasy available at www.kceasy.com also taps into the Kazaa network, is open source, and spyware free. Check it out.

  37. Re:Integrity checking is needed. :-) by Fjornir · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sir, your accusation (as opposed to a friendly request for information) makes you look like the troll in this case -- especially given that this is quite trivial.

    But if you check ftp.kernel.org -- or any mirror you happen to trust -- you will find .sign files corresponding to each tarball. If you want to pull a tarball from a potentially untrusted source one needs to simply get that .sign file, and then run

    gpg --verify [signature] [tarball]

    --
    I want a new world. I think this one is broken.
  38. Re:Theft by aoteoroa · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Try asking a random selection of 1000 people the following question: "Am I a thief if I make a tape of a friend's (copyrighted) CD?" (this is a form of copyright violation most people, even not computer literate, can understand and relate to). If you can honestly say that more than a small percentage will agree that you're a thief, then I think you're deluded.

    Let me tell you what I believe. Firstly: I believe that the majority is not always right. They are living in a dreamworld so to speak. So you can not prove whether copyright violation is theft simply by asking people if it is.

    Therefore let me present another example of copyright violation, and you can tell me whether or not it is theft.

    Imagine that you own an engineering firm that designs heavy haul trucks. One of your engineers has resigned and taken a job elsewhere. Before he leaves he uploads your AutoCad drawings (like source code to the manufacturing business) to his server at home.

    If I understand your point of view correctly he has not taken any physical item of worth from your company. He has only copied your designs. Therefore no theft has occurred.

    I believe that copying, a copyrighted work is theft and it applies to all sorts of intellectual property such as proprietary software, AutoCad schematics, music, and art.

  39. Spyware... one more reason by generationxyu · · Score: 2, Informative

    to use giFT.

    --
    I mod down pyramid schemes in sigs.
  40. Re:Theft by Awptimus+Prime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It would be a man's moral right to kill a man he finds in bed with his wife. Still, that offers no salvation from the legal system.

    Fear of punishment should keep them in line. That's separate from morality.

  41. Re:Theft by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Then you'd better hope that you don't run into someone who thinks murder is ok...

    Indeed, but the grandparent poster is still correct. We are socialized into certain morals. Some morals, such as murder being wrong, are held almost universally. Yet, there have been cultures such as the Romans with their gladiators that have somewhat trumped this moral law. Morals help glue society together, but they are never absolute, and are ultimately determined by the individual.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.