Slashdot Mirror


Genetically Modified Flower Detects Landmines

cdneng2 writes "Yahoo has the story that a Danish company has developed a plant that can detect landmines. The genetically modified weed that has been coded to change color when its roots come in contact with nitrogen-dioxide (NO2) evaporating from explosives buried in soil." The company website has a bit more information.

102 of 518 comments (clear)

  1. What Happens by City_Idiot · · Score: 5, Funny

    When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

    1. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      When the kids of 3[rd] world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      Hilarity ensues.

      Just kidding.

    2. Re:What Happens by Golias · · Score: 4, Interesting
      When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      Kind of puts a new twist on the old anti-Goldwater commercial, eh?

      Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem is probably very likely to listen to the nice soldiers that say "stay away from flowers that look like this... we grow them on mine fields."

      The alternative is to further engineer the flowers to look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone.

      --

      Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    3. Re:What Happens by catbutt · · Score: 5, Funny

      We not only get rid of mines, but wipe out color blindness. Two birds with one stone!

    4. Re:What Happens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *singing*

      "Tiptoe through the tulips..."

    5. Re:What Happens by Alkaiser · · Score: 3, Funny

      You know...if *I* were a scientist, I would just hand out normal seeds, and tell people to plant them. :)

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
    6. Re:What Happens by Bagheera · · Score: 3, Insightful

      A combined effect? A one less mine, and some chlorine in the gene pool.

      But seriously, this seems like one of the most humanatarian uses of BioTech I've ever heard of. They even made the plant sterile on deployment to stop cross contamination.

      Awesome development if it works as advertised.

      --
      Never attribute to malice what can as easily be the result of incompetence...
    7. Re:What Happens by glesga_kiss · · Score: 4, Insightful
      When the kids of 3 world countries run out into the fields to pick the flowers??

      They grow up hating the country that made the landmines? Sounds all too familiar.

    8. Re:What Happens by cduffy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      to stop cross contamination

      You mean "to prevent unauthorized use", right?

      Preventing cross-contamination is just a handy side effect.

    9. Re:What Happens by gorilla · · Score: 3, Funny
      The alternative is to further engineer the flowers to look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone.

      That works for girls, but makes the flowers more attractive to boys, for purposes of torturing the girls.

    10. Re:What Happens by geekoid · · Score: 3, Funny

      ".. look or smell unpleasant, so kids will leave them alone."

      you don't have any kids, do you?

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    11. Re:What Happens by Guppy06 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem is probably very likely to listen to the nice soldiers"

      Any kid growing up in a country where landmines are a problem probably has at least one friend their own age short a few limbs.

    12. Re:What Happens by AllenChristopher · · Score: 2, Insightful
      nice soldiers that say "stay away from flowers that look like this... we grow them on mine fields."

      It isn't that soldiers will grow them in mine fields. The point is that if you live in, say, Laos, and you want to make a new farm, you don't have to walk through it searching for bombs with a stick anymore. You spread these seeds from a plane, then wait. Anywhere the flowers say there's a mine, you do whatever. Throw a big rock at it? Ask the internationally sponsored mine-clearing teams to take it? I don't know.

      This is a useful idea many parts of Asia. Vast swathes of countryside were tactically mined in various wars, then abandoned. Nobody really knows which fields these are.

      As for kids... it's often children who do the mine-clearing now. There is relatively insignificant chance that children will be more attracted to the flowers which have changed color to indicate a bomb than the rest of the flowers, and at the same time, many children will be saved from operating the bomb-prodding stick. This is sure to bring a net profit of children.

  2. Yes, but... by dustmote · · Score: 5, Funny

    Who's going to volunteer to plant them? BOOOM!!! Still, this is a pretty neat idea. Might not be so good for people who are color-blind, like my dad. :)

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
    1. Re:Yes, but... by mlush · · Score: 2, Funny
      Who's going to volunteer to plant them? BOOOM!!!

      somehow I think landmines will not blow up if a small weed seed falls on them

    2. Re:Yes, but... by SkArcher · · Score: 4, Interesting

      RTA -the plant is infertile, so it won't spread into unwanted areas. They'll probably spread the seed from aircraft hoppers - it'll have a fairly light seed casing.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    3. Re:Yes, but... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 4, Funny

      Then you just have to worry about birds eating them.. but hey, if a bird explodes, you found a mine.

    4. Re:Yes, but... by synth7 · · Score: 4, Funny

      Who's going to volunteer to plant them?

      Ah, yes... the brainpower of geekus maximus shows that it needs to get out of the house a little more often. You see, plants produce these little things called "seeds" which are actually baby plants in hibernation. These "seeds" typically germinate when sitting in suitable soil... it all depends upon the plant itself, of course: a scrub grass or low-lying shrub will grow in pretty harsh places.

      Anyhow, I hope you can see where this is leading. Plants tend to reproduce on their own without the need for human intervention. Of course, if you really wanted these plants to grow in a location, you could always try something innovative like flying overhead and sprinkling a mixtures of seed and fertilizer on the patch of land in question. It may take several years for the plant to get established and spread, but, well, I don't think anyone would complain about turning this particular patch of land over to these weeds for a time, as it's a bit tricky to use it for anything with all those mines in it anyhow.

      Honestly, at least half a dozen people have posted "How are they going to plant it?!?" without ever bothering to stop and think for a second. What is this, Fark.com?

    5. Re:Yes, but... by SkArcher · · Score: 5, Informative

      and evidently you haven't actually read the article - the plants are infertile (don't themselves produce seeds) to prevent the genetically modified weed from spreading in areas where it isn't wanted.

      It is sown from the air or from conventionally cleared strips of land.

      It grows in roughly 3 - 6 weeks.

      --

      An infinite number of monkeys will eventually come up with the complete works of /.
    6. Re:Yes, but... by Russ+Steffen · · Score: 3, Insightful

      More importantly, that's a mine you no longer have to worry about...

    7. Re:Yes, but... by brinch · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Now correct me if i'm wrong, but I believe that producing seeds isn't exactly the only way a plant can spread over a very large area.

    8. Re:Yes, but... by Sajma · · Score: 2, Interesting

      While airborne seeding and infertility are necessary to make this work, they might make it difficult to get the right "resolution" of seeds on the field. I assume mines are not too large (2ft radius?), so one needs seeds at least that close together, if not closer. Is possible using airborne seeding?

      If the weeds were fertile, then they could increase their density to the maximum the field could sustain. If one could make the weed's fertility "time out" after a few generations or depend on some fertilizer only present in the area of deployment, then one could deploy a fertile weed that could not spread too far.

      Of course, "Jurassic Park" showed us that any genetically-engineered technique for controlling a population is doomed to spectacular failure :)

    9. Re:Yes, but... by Greedo · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are correct, sir.

      Some plants just grow big, tuborous root systems, which occaisionally sprout up new, baby plants. Some other plants (like ivy and spider plants) send out shooters, hoping that one of them will land on fertile ground, root and grow.

      I've forgotten the technical names for those "reproductive" methods, but there you go.

      --
      Tuus crepidae innexilis sunt.
    10. Re:Yes, but... by TWX · · Score: 3, Funny

      "...to prevent the genetically modified weed from spreading in areas where it isn't wanted."

      Like, the United States Drug Czar's office?

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    11. Re:Yes, but... by amRadioHed · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Also, I don't think that the seeds would need to be closer together than the land mines. The gas is going to disperse as it travels through the soil, it's not going to close in on a smaller point over the mine. I'm sure the engineers have thoroughly researched the optimal seed dispersion.

      --
      We hope your rules and wisdom choke you / Now we are one in everlasting peace
    12. Re:Yes, but... by trikberg · · Score: 3, Informative

      Anti-tank mines have a diameter of 30-40 cm, are 6-8 cm deep and weigh about 10kg. I can also tell you that it not fun at all to carry 2 or more for several kilometers somewhere in the middle of a Finnish forest.

      The largest mines are probably anti-personnel claymore mines. They are something like 25cm high and 50cm wide and produce a huge (50-100m) conical storm of shrapnel. They are however usually attached to a tree or similar structure so that the effect acts horizontally taking out a lot of infantry and perhaps unarmored vehicles. The plants are of no use when looking for these.

      There are several kinds of mines that can be dispersed from aircraft. the ones I've seen are Russian and are about 10cm wide, 5cm high and look sort of like butterflies so that they can be packed efficiently and disperse widely when dropped. These are not dug into the ground so I doubt the plant will be of much use in finding them. Now someone is thinking that such small mines that are above the ground shouldn't be a problem, but account for the fact that the a plane can drop several thousands in one run. Combine that with toxic gas and/or napalm and it's a really big problem.

      The kinds of mines that the plants are probably used to find are anti-personnel mines dug into the ground. These usually consist of an explosive charge 10cm wide and about 10cm high with some shrapnelling stuff in them. On top of that a trigger is attached making the whole contraption just above 15cm high. The whole thing is dug into the ground and covered with a cm or two of dirt so that it goes off when a soldier (or civilian) steps on it.

      --
      This post is free (as in cheese in a mousetrap).
    13. Re:Yes, but... by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think "conventionally cleared" referred to conventional mine clearing, not conventional scrub-brush clearing. But the logic of using an indicator plant works for both types of clearing - mine and brush. Deep mines are often overlooked by mine-clearing operations, but because buried objects tend to gradually work their way to the surface, several people are killed yearly in fields thought cleared of mines. In any event people do often start cultivating land suspected of having mines even without formal mine-clearing having occurred. This usually happens when the alternative is to starve to death. Planting such an indicator grass would be very valuable in both these situations.

  3. Spirit of Diana Spencer by The+I+Shing · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wish Diana Spencer were alive to see this development. I bet she would have gotten other celebrities to underwrite the use of this technology to save countless lives worldwide. But luckily there are other wealthy individuals who might undertake an experiment with this plant, and make that company rich in the process (which is, in the words of Stuart Smalley, "okay").

    Elton John will write a song about it, too.

    Nice to see a company making a bio weapon that helps people instead of making them die horribly and slowly.

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
  4. KEEP MOVING!!! by docbrown42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Stop to smell the roses, and go BOOM? :) Actually, this is a pretty smart idea. Maybe they should code it into something really fast growing, like kudzu. -Ed

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
    1. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think a field full of kudzu is worse than a field full of land mines. After all, you can continue to farm a field of land mines, if you're willing to risk getting blown up. If the field's full of kudzu, you can't farm it any more.

      --
      "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    2. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by lcsjk · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's probably safer to take a chance on land mines than to be swallowed up by Kudzu while you're asleep. ... Look out on the sides of the roads in parts of Alabama and Georgia and you'll see the humps/bumps where cows and cars have paused too long and succumbed to the onslaught of fast growing Kudzu. ..... On the other hand, if you could genetically engineer Kudzu to die unless it encountered a land mine, it could turn red and within a few hours, assuming normal growth rate, protect the mine from intrusion by kids, adults and animals. Within a few days, it might even protect against tractors and tanks getting to the mine. Within a few weeks, the local population would be devoured and there would be no one left to get to the mines anyway, so there would be no need for exploding the mines. Very cost effective.

    3. Re:KEEP MOVING!!! by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Obligatory kudzu joke:

      A man in Texas decided he wanted a nice gazebo in his backyard and wanted some nice ivy growing over it. He didn't want to wait a decade or so for the ivy to grow around the gazebo. He'd heard that kudzu was pretty fast growing though and so he planted some near the base of the gazebo.

      A year later he burned the thing to the ground, poured concrete over it, and sold the place. The kudzu probably came back.

      Serious notes -- planting kudzu anywhere in the US is a federal crime, a violation of the Noxious Weed Act of 1974. It's virtually impossible to kill the roots -- which can have root nodules the size of a basketball -- and so while RoundUp and similar herbicides will kill the leaves it'll simply be back within a few weeks or months (depending on time of year -- kudzu goes dormant in winter. Never, ever buy any land in the SE US during late fall or winter if there are vines anywhere near; very few other ivys go dormant during this time period). Those root nodules will let it keep doing this for a decade or more.

  5. Why do they have to change color? by Kaeru+the+Frog · · Score: 4, Funny

    Shouldn't the gardeners blowing up while planting flowers be enough?

    1. Re:Why do they have to change color? by lommer · · Score: 4, Informative

      I realize this is a joke, but to stem the flood of responses by people who didn't RTFA, here's the scoop:

      You take a plane, fill it with seed "bomblets" and disperse them over a minefield. The bomblets embed in the soil and the plants grow. Within a few months you have a field of plants, a few of which are a different colour. The ones that have changed colour are close to mines. This makes finding the mines easier, and it also makes it possible to find a safe route through the field by only looking at the colour of the plants.

    2. Re:Why do they have to change color? by HBI · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What happens if you have a well sealed mine that doesn't leak nitrates?

      --
      HBI's Law: Frequency of calling others Nazis is directly correlated with the likelihood of the accuser being Communist.
    3. Re:Why do they have to change color? by placeclicker · · Score: 2, Funny

      so its like a giant version of minesweeper..

      --

      Browse at -1, because trolls are often the most creative part of /.
  6. I can't help myself... by 10101001011 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Someone's going to be pushing up the daisies!

  7. GM is good by pbrinich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well, this might be one use of GM where the environmentalists can't complain much with all the children maimed and killed by these things each year...

    1. Re:GM is good by Felix+The+Cat · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, this might be one use of GM where the environmentalists can't complain much with all the children maimed and killed by these things each year...

      Hrmph. Don't you believe it. There are people out there who would, in the words of my father, "bitch if you hung 'em with a new rope."

      --
      Windows is the Acme of computing -- in the Wile E. Coyote sense.
  8. Pick the flower by c_oflynn · · Score: 5, Funny

    I can just see a field of flowers all one colour.

    Then there is one flower that is a different colour, and you think its so unique. You go over to take a look at it...

  9. On the topic of DNA by $calar · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One of my professors does research in nanotechnology. He is currently growing nanotubes in his lab and one of the applications of this technology is as a detector, such as what this plant does, only at the nano-scale. Apparently when the technology matures, detectors of certain types of illnesses can be made. By a drop of blood on the detector, one can learn the results instantly instead of waiting for human analysis. Very cool.

    1. Re:On the topic of DNA by jim3e8 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The Kurzweil article contained a section titled "The Double Exponential Growth of the Economy During the 1990s Was Not a Bubble". Meanwhile, I'm reading "A Thoughtful Look at Indian Outsourcing" on the front page.

  10. Flower power? by bdesham · · Score: 2, Funny
    "Flower-Power Could Help Clear Land mines"
    Good, this sounds like a great excuse to blow up as many of these as we possibly can.

    :-)
    --
    Alcohol and Calculus don't mix. Don't drink and derive.
  11. Drop them from planes over third world countries by Jonas+the+Bold · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Use something like a crop duster at a highish altitude to drop the seeds all over large areas of land in third world countries. This will make demining so much easier.

    If the environmentalists oppose this, if they can engineer the seeds so that the plants can't have offspring (I forget what the term is), they could drop a ton of seeds over a tract of land they plan to demine, and a few months later finding the mines will be very easy.

    --
    Everything seemed to be going so nice
    'till the end of all beings punched right through the ice
  12. Big deal by overshoot · · Score: 4, Funny
    The grass in my back yard turns green around land mines already.

    OK, seriously, this is great. Too many kids are missing body parts from old munitions.

    --
    Lacking <sarcasm> tags, /. substitutes moderation as "Troll."
  13. Good Idea by Grey_14 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is the kinda thing Genetic Engineering and Modification should be going into, not for Cheaper prices in the supermarket, or Glowing fish,
    Lets see more food in starving country's, Less Landmines, and other ways to improve life,

    Of course, thats whats been said about just about any new or improved technology in the last what, 30 years?

    1. Re:Good Idea by techno-vampire · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If the ground's been fought over, it's probably very fertile now. Not only because of the blood spilled, but because the nitrates from the munitions get into the soil.

      --
      Good, inexpensive web hosting
    2. Re:Good Idea by donutello · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Cheaper prices in the supermarket are usually the result of greater production and lower cost to produce so the same stuff that brings you cheaper prices in the supermarket is what you need to have more food in starving countries.

      GM is a tool. Like almost any other tool you can use it for good, evil or something frivolous.

      What next? You want legislation saying that computers should only be used to educate low-income students and not for playing games?

      --
      Mmmm.. Donuts
    3. Re:Good Idea by Thaelon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is the kinda thing Genetic Engineering and Modification should be going into, not for Cheaper prices in the supermarket, or Glowing fish, Lets see more food in starving country's, Less Landmines, and other ways to improve life,

      Of course, thats whats been said about just about any new or improved technology in the last what, 30 years?


      No let's not see more food. Let's see more contraceptives. The problem isn't that there isn't enough food, it's that there are too many people for the land to supply. Sending food on temporarily solves the symptom of the problem. The problem being overpopulation. It sounds harsh, but in the end fewer people would starve fewer children especially.

      Unfortunately I can't take credit for this idea, I read it in Ishmael.

      --

      Question everything

  14. And... by mewyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Despite the fact that this flower may save hundreds of lives and thousands of injuries, anti-genetic research people are bound to delay this from being deploied.
    I do think that it will need to be tested to make sure it causes no harm, but it is going to be a great help in some war-torn countries.

    Mewyn Dy'ner

  15. There's an example of unique thinking. by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Glowing fish are neat, but this is the type of breakthrough that should convince holdout countries that genetically modified plants are a good thing. Granted, whatever this plant is it isn't likely it'll grow everywhere, but this is so innovative that I wonder if it can be applied to the detection of other materials in the soil.

    It's even self-limiting, so despite being a weed it won't choke out the local flora.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:There's an example of unique thinking. by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      The article mentions potentially using it to detect heavy metals in the soil as well such as might be found near nuclear or chemical waste reservoirs.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  16. The hippies were right all along by addie · · Score: 2, Funny

    Flower power!

  17. Phase 2 by John+Jorsett · · Score: 4, Funny

    Develop the next generation flower that detonates itself, taking out the mine, instead of just turning a different color. You'd probably risk being gunned down by airport security for carrying flowers, but progress comes at a price ...

  18. Re:But.... by techno-vampire · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If you'd read the article, it suggests using crop-dusting planes to plant the seeds. Then, when they see where the mines are, they not only can tell just where to dig, they can see how to get to them safely.

    --
    Good, inexpensive web hosting
  19. What about fertilisers? by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Many fertilisers are made from various nitrogen compounds that are similar to explosives. That is why you can make a pretty nice bang with fertiliser + diesel fuel, and why there is a nice little relationship between fertiliser and explosives factories.

    Sure, out in the African bush you would not expect to find fertilisers but I extect some of the mine hot zones in Asia are fertilised quite heavily.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
  20. Congratulations! by Erick+the+Red · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Landmines are a HUGE problem in so many countries. Engineers Without Borders has a yearly competition for de-mining technology. These plants could make the new devices obsolete.

    One quick question: what about minefields in the desert? Plenty of places have mines where plants don't usually grow (or at least not densely enough for the plants to detect them all).
    --

    DO NOT WRITE IN THIS SPACE

    ok
  21. Larry Niven completes it. by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now, crossbreed them with those heatbeam-shooting Ringworld sunflowers, and you've got something that detects mines, and then blows them up.

    Now, how do you get rid of the fields of killer sunflowers covering the landscape? Errmm. sorry, didn't hear that. Gotta go...

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  22. unintended consequences by KingJoshi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is ground-breaking technology and it's really cool to see it work to say lives. But I wonder what unintended consequences may occur from planting weeds around. This is very ignorant of me, but what effects could they have if they spread too fast or whatever since some areas where there are landmines are actually agricultural. I guess this technology could be used on other types of plants too, right?

    --
    In times like these, it is helpful to remember that there have always been times like these. - Paul Harvey
    1. Re:unintended consequences by foniksonik · · Score: 2, Informative

      They do say the plants are modified to be genetically infertile and unable to spread their own seeds.

      As always there is no guarantee and as we all have heard, plants and especially hardy ones like weeds can cross-pollinate with similar breeds.

      it sounds like they are making this issue a big concern however.

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  23. What do you need flowers for! by Mieckowski · · Score: 5, Funny

    All you have to do is look at the numbers in the adjacent boxes.

    People are so lazy!

  24. Princess Diana by savagedome · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Princess Diana, for one, would have been very happy to see this development. Although her calling a ban on international landmines sparked a row as it was out of sync with the government policy.

    Definitely one of the better use of genetics.

  25. If they really want to make money..... by Pure+Diluted+Reality · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They should make a condom that contains plant material that can detect STD's and change colors accourdingly.

  26. It won't work by psb777 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Landmines are fairly small devices so a high plant density would be required. Much land is not easily planted - esp by airplane. It will have to be a remarkable plant to grow in all the conditions it will be needed. They would need one variety for paddy fields, another for savanna, etc etc. To have a chance of getting growing plants in sufficient density you would have to plough the land first.

    --
    Paul Beardsell
  27. Thought it was mimes by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Sorry, I thought this was about flowers detecting mimes. I was so looking forward to using this during my next trip to New York City. My mistake.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  28. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by radicalskeptic · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article already states that these flowers cannot reproduce.

    --
    WARNING: If accidentally read, induce vomiting.
  29. poetic by theCat · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There is something marvelously just and poetic about using flowers to detect land mines. Thousands of children and innocents a year are blown to giblets, or horribly hutilated, by land mines. May a thousand flowers bloom.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  30. Re:Proliferation of the genetic material by thelexx · · Score: 3, Informative

    "Of course, the idea is that these plants should reproduce and grow everywhere..."

    No, it isn't. The article specifically states that the plants are sterile and cannot seed.

    --
    "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  31. Re:That is INSANE. by c_oflynn · · Score: 4, Informative
    If you were first post, that would mean you *should* have had lots of time that could have been spent reading the article.

    Plants normally go red or redish in autumn where the red pigments dominate over the green ones, or as a result of stressed growth conditions. The genetically engineered plants are modified in a way that only allows these plants to go red if triggered by a specific stimulus present in the soil. The stimulus is unique to the plant dependent on the actual application that is pursued with the specific plant. Stimuli may be heavy metals, or NO2 that evaporates when explosives are reduced in the soil. Such stimuli trigger the production of a key-enzyme in the biochemical pathway responsible for production of the group of red pigments called anthocyanins. The resulting colour change is expected within 3-6 weeks dependent on the growth conditions.
  32. To think, all this time... by foxtrot · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...I've just been using my binoculars.

    "Landmine spotted, check your command map."

    I didn't even notice a "gardner" class in the limbo screen...

    -JDF

  33. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by KReilly · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But I wonder what happens when it misses some of the mines (E.g. Mines too deep, too new, plant did not grow close enough too it). That kind of defeats the purpose of doing this if they have to double back over the entire field to make sure they have not missed any. I think the idea is awesome, but not fool proof. And the fact that these seeds have to survive, and beat out other plants in the area. I think it is totally fascinating, and a creative idea, but seems to have a very small range of effective uses.

  34. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by danlyke · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA. Both suggestions are covered in the article.

  35. Re:As long as nobody patents them... by eegad · · Score: 2, Funny

    These plants could be a really inexpensive way of exposing landmines. I really hope this project works out.

    Sorry, I've already patented the idea of leaving really useful things unpatented.

  36. Re:Drop them from planes over third world countrie by dustmote · · Score: 2, Funny

    Oh, now reassuring. That means they're going to reproduce, escape to the mainland, and make several bad sequels, right? :)

    --


    -1, "1337" speak
  37. Would be useful for WWI battlefields also by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This might also be useful for World War I battlefields in France and Belgium, where a number of farmers are killed every year by unexploded shells buried underground.

    sPh

  38. Re:Cost? by Carnildo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The nice thing about these flowers is they have a pretty good idea of what the market will be like. Price the seeds so that de-mining the world will cover the research and production costs, leaving about a 10% profit.

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
  39. Bosnia and parts of Croatia. by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2, Informative

    Look, I do my field research in the Balkans. There are still swathes of ground you'd better not fucking walk unless you are absolutely sure there are no mines. Even near Plitvice Park in Croatia, there are still quarantined areas within 150 meters of the 'main' road to Gracac. If you need to stop and take a dump in nature (few places to do it otherwise there), you better know the words for "Danger Mines."

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
  40. The USA still supports the use of landmines by djmurdoch · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article states

    The use of land mines was outlawed in the 1997 Ottawa Convention and more than 90 countries committed themselves last year to cleaning up the debris of war to reduce the number of civilian casualties from munitions left by armed conflicts.

    However, the USA was not a signatory to this treaty as of 2002, according to this web page. Apparently there were plans to sign in 2006, but the landmine-lovers were working to change those. Has anything changed?

    There aren't many other countries that were both democratic and non-signatories: Finland, India, Israel, Korea, Russia, Turkey (but the democracy of some of those might be questionable). The entire "Axis of Evil" made the list, though.

    1. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by BlueEyes_Austin · · Score: 2, Informative

      The US requested permission to use on the DMZ in North Korea and at G'Bay. When this was not granted, the US walked.

    2. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The US military has an issue with getting rid of landmines. North Korea. The entire defense of South Korea weighs heavily on the use of landmines (both anti-personnel and anti-tank).

      The US does, however, clean up areas that it's mined once it's done with them. I doubt it's a perfect job, but it's considerably better than the vast number of military forces that use mines and don't clean them up (which is where the issue has come from).

      If anyone can suggest an equally effective deterrent to invasion that requires an equal amount of manpower, I'm sure the US Army would like to hear about it.

      It's not an issue of "landmine lovers", it's an issue of doing protection in an effective manner. (Which, BTW, is the condition on signing in 2006... AFAIK, nobody has stepped up to the plate). I haven't found any reports of the US using landmines anywhere else -- including Iraq -- since 1997 (the mines at Guantanamo were removed in 1999). They did stockpile them, but they apparantly weren't used. The US has not sold landmines internationally since 1993.

      BTW, you missed Pakistan, Georgia, Belarus, Egypt, Estonia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Latvia, Mongolia (parliamentary - very much questionable), Morocco (constitutional monarchy; similar to the UK's), Nepal, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Singapore, Sri Lanka, and Tuvalu. All have some form of representive government along the lines of a republic or democracy (no, the US is not a democracy -- it's a republic). Between those and the ones you listed, it's about a third of the list. Admittedly, some of the countries on the (full) list probably just haven't bothered -- particularly Tuvalu and Tonga.

    3. Re:The USA still supports the use of landmines by refactored · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Nope, that is the stated reason. The real reason is the yanks just love their cluster munitions. They feel they really have the edge on the world with them.

  41. Minesweeper Flowers by slstickle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will these flowers be genetically engineered to have numbers on them, indicating how many mines are growing in the plots next to them?

  42. Re:That is INSANE. by Hentai · · Score: 4, Informative

    For those who are curious, here is a picture of the little guy in bloom - presumably, the entire plant turns red (stem and all) in the presence of NO2, not just the flowers.

    --
    -Hentai [in vita non pacem est]
  43. Planting... by bmorris · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sounds like a swell idea, so long as I don't have be the guy that walks throught the field and plants the seeds...

  44. Re:Scatter the seeds by plane. by SoSueMe · · Score: 3, Funny

    They're going to be called "MyDoom" blooms.
    Watch for them in an e-mail real soon.

  45. Mine Disposal by chadjg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm no EOD tech, but maybe finding the little buggers is 98% of the problem. Once they are found a person could either just mark and leave them in place or blow them up.

    Once the weeds mark the mines, a rich villager could call in the army or police and they will lay a few dollars worth of detonating cord next to the mines and clear the field at 20,000 feet per second. Or the army guy could sit back and take shots at the mines from beyond the minimum safe difference.

    The poorer and/or depressed villager could tie a rope onto a chunk of tree or a rock, heave the weight on the other side fo the marked area, get behind a tree and then give the rope a good pull.

    Obviously these methods have problems. both would leave a lot of fragments flying around, and are not exactly risk free for the person doing the job.

    Call me a cruel, heartless bastard, but this isn't oing to be a problem. All you have to do is tell the villagers to stay away from a certain area while the work is being done. Anybody that forgets or doesn't get the news is just gonna be SOL. If a hut gets a bunch of fragments thrown thru it, then they will have to spend a day repairing it. No big deal.

    From what I've been able to pick up, a few flying chunks of metal is not going to be real high on the worry list for people that have land mine problems. Waking up is a bigger risk. Getting enough food, not getting some god-awful tropical disease or not pissing off the latest dictator is going to fill their worry bin.

    Most countries that have real land mine issues are desperately poor and need something like these plants just to cut down on their chances of having their kids legs blown off. Rich countries can solve their problems with robotics and large amounts of beer for their off duty ordinance techs.

    Right or wrong, certainty is for rich countries. Bravo to these scientists.

    --
    Why do I have this? I don't smoke.
  46. Re:3 to 6 weeks?? by steptoe6125 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    3 to 6 weeks is not a long time considering that many countries have spent upwards of 10 years trying to mitigate their existing landmine problem.

  47. Why Genetically Modified? by bay43270 · · Score: 2, Funny

    As long as your spreading seed by airplane, just use bird seed... let the birds find the mines!

  48. Inspector Fescue by Sanksa+Wott · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think some of those weed genes were around when I was a kid in my parents yard.

    But the ones at my parents house only detected dog poop and septic tanks. And they changed the grass from its natural beige color to strange dark-green hue. :)

  49. In Quebec City by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People still find unexploded cannonballs in their backyards dating back to the British/French colonial war.

    They just use metal detectors though.

  50. One more thing by InsaneCreator · · Score: 3, Funny

    Small print: you need to plow the minefield first.

  51. Good, good, good!!! by ElGanzoLoco · · Score: 4, Informative

    My family lives in Cambodia (both NGO workers), one of the most mined countries on earth.

    Kids still die everyday because they step on landmines. There are anti tank mines, that will kill you, antipersonal mines, that will cripple you, and UXO (unexploded ordnance) that can do about anything.

    You go to the market in certain places in Cambodia, and you see that almost 10% (no kidding) of the population is crippled, one or both legs missing, sometimes an arm... Shit.

    Worse: Cambodia has huge monsoon rains, and the floods eventually transform into torrents. So the mines MOVE with time. So there you are, happily walking on a path that has been un-mined last year, and BOOM, the rain had brought a mine right there. Scary.

    Even worse. Sometimes UXO (more rarely, mines) go right into the city, because of some construction site that uses sand dug from out of the city, and that has UXO's inside (rare, but it happened to one of our friends doing construction for his NGO).

    Anything that can be used in demining should be. You might think that demining mostly occurs in rice fields and stuff but no, in some remote places over there, they have to clear villages *house by house*, garden by garden. There are still millions (litteraly) of landdmines scattered everywhere, and even though the foreign demining teams, and the Cambodians they have trained, do a great job, it never will be enough.

    Still, Cambodia is one of the most beautiful countries on earth. Now, most touristic-and-not-so-touristic places are safe, so go there, but stay away from anywhere the locals tell you to NOT go.

    --
    Hello! I'm a disaster waiting to happen!
  52. Poetic and all, but... by danharan · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The company "hopes to have a prototype ready for use within a few years". Vaporware?

    Also, are there real cost advantages to use that over, say, little rovers with metal detectors? What percentage of the cost of clearing landmines is spent on detection?

    And, as many people have mentionned already, there are a few places with desert conditions where this approach won't be useful.

    While this is nice technology (and they at least took care to make the plants infertile, which is great), I don't know if it will have any practical applications. In the meantime, I suggest either badgering your gummint to fund clean up efforts and/or donating to NGOs that are de-mining.

    --
    Information: "I want to be anthropomorphized"
  53. probably depends on the compounds by The+Tyro · · Score: 2, Informative

    Most fertilizer is some kind of nitrate (NO3)... ammonium nitrate, etc. High explosives, such as the type commonly used in munitions, are actually N02 compounds, rather than simple nitrates. The nitrates/nitrites are often used in explosives as the oxidizing agent, sometimes in an internal REDOX reaction, sometime to oxidize an additional reagent. As a fertilizer bomb example, the explosive used in the OK city bombing was basically ANFO (acronym for Ammonium Nitrate and Fuel Oil). It's an explosive agent commonly used in mining, and has a lower brisance rating than most military explosives. Brisance refers to the shattering power of a given explosive, and has to do with the speed or rate of deflagration. ANFO is relatively slow compared to some other agents, and military explosive can be much faster: For instance, if you were a combat engineer taking down concrete bridge pilings, you'd want to take advantage of a faster agent to shatter the concrete, rather than a a slower agent that tends to "burn", rather than rapidly detonate.

    For example, Tritonol (trade name for the common explosive TNT, or 2,4,6-TrinitroToluene) is three nitro groups on a Benzene ring (a CH3 group at the number 1 position makes the base molecule Toluene, rather than conventional benzene). A certain percentage of TNT is actually DNT, since the compound deteriorates over time and loses a Nitro Group (becoming 2,4-DiNitroToluene. It takes some work to actually produce a high yield of TNT during the manufacturing process, rather than DNT... progressive deactivation of the ring occurs with addition of multiple N02 groups, though you can manipulate reaction conditions to push the reaction to completion.

    Another example would be the Picrate compounds... used during WWI. They are not used much anymore... too hazardous to handle. Picric Acid is chemically very close to TNT, except it's 2,4,6-TrinitroPhenol (think of TNT with the CH3 group exchanged for an alcohol, or OH group, making the base molecule Phenol, rather than Toluene).

    The study of high explosives is actually quite fascinating... particularly when you get into the physics of the blast waves themselves. Hang out with bomb or EOD guys if you get the chance; they're geeks with high explosives.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  54. Detection limits by Big+Bob+the+Finder · · Score: 2, Interesting
    There are a couple of big problems with this technique that I didn't see mentioned. Right now, I genetically engineer plants for a living; before that, I used to be an explosives chemist. Yes, it's been a wacky life.

    The biggest problem will be that nitrous oxide naturally occurs in some soils; your false positive rate would be high. Moreover, as explosives rot and decay in the ground, the residue spreads out over a fairly large area. Many military bases are plagued with "pink water" from TNT leachate, for example. As a result, a single landmine might produce a fairly large disc of activity, meaning you'd still need to manually probe for the landmine. In some cases, these are nothing more than plywood boxes, which rapidly degrade when put in place in areas that receive plenty of rainfall. In war-torn areas, trying to find something like this after it has aged, even when you have a rough idea of where it might be, is still hazardous and time-consuming.

    Next to this, the biggest problem is going to be that the plant being used is not capable of growing in very dry areas, where landmines are a serious issue (Angola, Namibia, Afghanistan, etc.). Even worse are areas like Kosovo, which receive so much rainfall that the vegetation has grown up and around landmines; wet areas like this have grown trees tall enough to make detection and removal a very serious problem. Large areas are not safely traversable once one leaves pavement, much less mow so that weeds like those used to detect explosives simply won't be visible. They're not tall enough.

    There is no panacea to landmines, and although it's good to see one possibility, I doubt many people in the business of landmine removal will find this to be a useful technique, much less stake their lives on it. The folks doing the tinkering in the lab have little or no idea what it's like in the field. It is a very, very difficult problem that a lot of smart people have spent a lot of time on. And it's still not enough.

  55. Only a couple of turns by sunbeam60 · · Score: 3, Funny
    no, the US is not a democracy -- it's a republic
    Right, but it only takes a few turns with anarchy to change into a democracy so the difference is really moot. Yes, yes, I know military units now cause two unhappy citizens instead of one, but the advantages far outweigh the disadvantages.
  56. Re:Will they grow in desserts? by aardvarkjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Will they grow in desserts?

    They'll grow in cake and fresh pie, but they won't grow so well in cold climates such as ice cream.

    --

    How can we continue to believe in a just universe and freedom to eat crackers if we have no ale?
  57. When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty! by refactored · · Score: 3, Interesting
    As of 23 October 2003 the 1997 treaty banning the use, production, stockpiling, and transfer of antipersonnel landmines has been ratified or acceded to by 141 countries which are States Parties. Another 9 countries have signed but have not yet completed their ratification process, bringing the total number of countries supporting the treaty to 150. 44 Countries have not yet joined the treaty.

    1997 Mine Ban Treaty - NON SIGNATORIES

    This is the list of the 44 countries that have not signed the 1997 Mine Ban Treaty as of 23 October 2003.

    1. ARMENIA
    2. AZERBAIJAN
    3. BAHRAIN
    4. BHUTAN
    5. CHINA
    6. CUBA
    7. EGYPT
    8. ESTONIA
    9. FINLAND
    10. GEORGIA
    11. INDIA
    12. IRAN
    13. IRAQ
    14. ISRAEL
    15. KAZAKHSTAN
    16. KOREA, NORTH
    17. KOREA, SOUTH
    18. KUWAIT
    19. KYRGYZSTAN
    20. LAOS
    21. LATVIA
    22. LEBANON
    23. LIBYA
    24. MICRONESIA
    25. MONGOLIA
    26. MOROCCO
    27. MYANMAR (BURMA)
    28. NEPAL
    29. OMAN
    30. PAKISTAN
    31. PALAU
    32. PAPUA NEW GUINEA
    33. RUSSIA
    34. SAUDI ARABIA
    35. SINGAPORE
    36. SOMALIA
    37. SRI LANKA
    38. SYRIA
    39. TONGA
    40. TUVALU
    41. UNITED ARAB EMIRATES
    42. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
    43. UZBEKISTAN
    44. VIETNAM
    (Source International Campaign to Ban Landmines
  58. Stop spreading them too! by vinlud · · Score: 2, Informative

    article:

    Mine Ban Treaty

    The Mine Ban Treaty obligates its participants to completely and permanently discontinue the use, production, stockpile, and transfer of antipersonnel landmines; to destroy stockpiles within four years; to clear mines within their own territories within ten years, and to provide continuing assistance to mine survivors.

    The Mine Ban Treaty, which went into effect on March 1, 1999, has been signed by nearly three quarters of the world's nations; it came into force faster than any other multi-lateral global agreement. Participants include all of the western hemisphere except the United States and Cuba, and all NATO countries except the United States and Turkey, though Turkey is in the process of acceding to the treaty. Most African nations and many Asian nations have joined the Mine Ban Treaty as well. For the full text of the Mine Ban Treaty, a list of countries that have signed, ratified, or not signed the treaty,

    --
    Repeat after me: We are all individuals
  59. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by Ancil · · Score: 2, Informative
    Can't speak for the other countries on the list, but I can tell you why the U.S. didn't sign on.

    America offered to sign this treaty. We liked this treaty. Landmines make no distinction between civilian and military personnel. They maim and kill civilians. However, the U.S. made it clear that the use of landmines within designated demilitarized zones was within the rules of war. And within what the United States considered "fair play".

    There had never been a coherent case why landmines can't be used in, for example, the DMZ between North and South Korea. There are no civilians there. No civilians would ever "blunder into" this area. In fact, it's impossible to trespass even if that's your intention . Landmines are there for the express purpose of destroying an invading army. That's the military's job: to kill enemy soldiers and armor.

    If the ICBL had acceded to this U.S. condition, we would have signed on. In fact, Clinton issued an executive order which de facto banned the use of landmines outside of declared demilitarized zones which were free of civilians. To be blunt, everywhere except the Korean DMZ.

    Has anyone got a good reason why landmines are a bad thing in such an area? They don't kill people any more dead than a machine gun would. And please skip arguments involving civilian casualties, since there aren't any civilians anywhere near the landmines. In fact, by killing soldiers in an area far from civilian populations, such landmines would certainly reduce civilian casualties in a conflict.

  60. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by theTerribleRobbo · · Score: 3, Insightful


    What about AFTER the conflict? One of the main problems with landmines is that they hang around after the conflict has finished, unless they're detonated.

    But then again, it's not hard to miss just one, maybe two, especially if you aren't organised (like some non-US armies may be).

  61. Re:When are you murderers going to sign the Treaty by instarx · · Score: 2, Informative

    This is great spin, and is true as far as it goes, but the REAL reason the US has not signed the treaty is that we are the world's largest exporter of arms, and banning mines would cost US companies MILLIONS of dollars yearly.