Slashdot Mirror


What's the Point of Building a Home Theater PC?

An anonymous reader writes "FiringSquad has written Building a Basic HTPC. They discuss why Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution, as well as why HTPC should integrate act like a component not a computer. They also go into upsampling of DVDs to HDTV."

87 of 358 comments (clear)

  1. Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Building a Basic HTPC
    February 03, 2004

    Summary: You've read about building no-budget Dual Opteron workstations, and RAID-less storage servers and even air filters at FiringSquad. Today we'll be looking at Building a Basic Home Theater PC. If you're thinking Small Form Factor ATX, you haven't learned anything from our previous articles. This HTPC is designed for two purposes only: high-definition upsampling of DVD video and personal video recording. If you ever wondered how DVD's can look better when brought to HDTV resolutions even though the source is the same, read inside.

    Introduction Page:: ( 1 / 10 )

    The HTPC or "Home Theater PC" is a popular but often nebulous concept. Everyone would agree that a fundamental component is that the pc be connected to a television but what the HTPC is used for is something to debate. Some people use a HTPC to play games on the big screen, while others see it as a way to enjoy high-quality DVD, others see it as a music/video/image jukebox, and still others see it as a way to get a low-cost HDTV by using a desktop monitor rather than TV.

    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner. Instead of starting off with a full-fledged HTPC, we're going to start with a very introductory approach to the HTPC and then through follow-up articles, add more features.

    For this introductory HTPC article, we have two very specific tasks: DVD upsampled to HDTV resolutions, and a personal TV recorder. Since we're "lazy," our HTPC needs to perform like a real piece of home theater equipment as much as possible. The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer. The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ? there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.

    Why these two tasks?

    We've designed this system as an ideal starting point for anyone with a "HDTV ready" television.

    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons. The most important factor is cost. Both TIVO and ReplayTV charge a subscription fee and ridiculous premiums for larger hard drives. With a PC, you can add and replace IDE hard drives on a whim and also enjoy free TV listings. In addition, it is possible to enjoy higher quality video through a PC-based system through improved video scaling than would otherwise be possible with a standard unit.

    Finally, ATI and other third-party software applications have media server applications that will allow their multimedia products to stream video to client systems on your desktop, and NVIDIA is expected to add this capability to its Personal Cinema line in the near future.

    The upsampled DVD is the more important feature in our HTPC today. Even if cost is no object, the HTPC approach to DVD can offer better picture quality than any stand-alone unit. DVDs are recorded with 480 lines of resolution, however it turns out that upsampling the video to a 720p or 1080i resolution for HDTV and HDTV-ready televisions will offer the best quality.

    It's a real phenomenon

    One of the most often confused concepts is the idea that upsampling DVDs to HDTV resolutions will make DVDs look as good as HDTV. It doesn't seem as if this is possible -- the data is not present to begin with. The real answer is that while an upsampled DVD isn't as good as true HDTV, it will look better than a straight 480 progressive lines of resolution. Here's why?

    HDTV-ready CRT

    Like a CRT PC monitor, an HDTV-ready CRT can sync at multiple resolutions. The catch is that the electron beam is not designed to change in size depending on the resolution (it changes but not by design). Suppose you have a 19" monitor running at 1280x1024 or 1600x1200. While reading this webpage, look at the white background. Get as close to the screen as you can to study the white. dy

    1. Re:Article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      err... That's clipped, there's a complete version here

    2. Re:Article text by kinzillah · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The complete text can also be read here with no problems.

      There must be a law that says people only mirror or post the text of articles on sites that aren't being slashdotted.

      --
      Douglas P. Price
  2. FPS by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 4, Funny

    Building a HTPC only makes sense if it can do something better than any other commercially available solution...

    Two words: Half Life.

    1. Re:FPS by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I'm from that school of nerd that wonders:

      "If I have a computer, why would I care about television?"

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    2. Re:FPS by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Interesting
      do you mean television the equiptment or television the institution?
      I mean the entire category of slack-jawed viewing without a keyboard.
      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    3. Re:FPS by Thuktun · · Score: 2

      I mean the entire category of slack-jawed viewing without a keyboard.

      A remote control is really just a wireless keyboard.

  3. umm, price?! by Glog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The point, Taco, is price. Why should I pay $2000 when I can have it for $200 in parts. Plus, there are plenty to people who get more enjoyment out of building something themselves.

    1. Re:umm, price?! by CrankyFool · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Price is not a good reason to build an HTPC unless you're willing to make a whole bunch of compromises and don't care about aesthetics.

      I priced out what it would take me to build a minimally-decent HTPC system, accounting for the specialized case (quiet, small, looks like it's an HT component), motherboard (because full-size ATX wouldn't fit in that case), processor, memory, decent TV capture cards, hard drive, DVD burner, etc. Hint: It wasn't $200. More like $700.

    2. Re:umm, price?! by rjelks · · Score: 4, Informative

      Maybe it wouldn't make as much sense if you are truely building from scratch, but this is slashdot. How many peeps here don't have a basement/closet full of spare parts. If you have a box sitting around, it's much cheaper than say a replayTV or MCE Windoze box. Part of building your own is the fun. Aside from that, you can cusomize your own box a lot more than a tivo or replaytv. Mame anyone? Check out MythTV for a cool OSS project or MyHtpc.net for a really cool, community driven front-end. For an all around informative site about hardware, and mostly windows frontend software, check out ruel.net It's more tweaking and screwing around, but more adaptable too.

    3. Re:umm, price?! by mekkab · · Score: 3, Insightful

      In actuality, a lot of slashdotters have found the price to be about what it would cost to go with a store bought solution. So I challenge you to spec out a system that functions as good as the store bought and is cheaper.

      The major point is builders pride. You do it because you love the doing.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    4. Re:umm, price?! by ryanr · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Right. I did a chapter on HTPCs recently for "Hardware Hacking: Have Fun While Voiding Your Warranty". IMHO, the two reasons for building your own HTPC are aesthetics and control. The latter meaning that you don't anyone else deciding how your commercial skip will work, or what you will and won't be allowed to network.

      Generally speaking, you won't be able to build a custom HTPC for less money than a commercial HTPC(-like) device with the exact same functions.

    5. Re:umm, price?! by Znork · · Score: 5, Insightful

      From what I've seen it's quite a bit more expensive to roll my own decent solution.

      The advantage from my own linux based solution is I have a shitload of features ranging from being able to back it up, remote in via ssh to adding any number of capture cards and disks I wish into it.

      The selling point of building it yourself is flexibility.

      The disadvantages are price and, of course, having to know a fair amount about computers to get it working.

    6. Re:umm, price?! by justMichael · · Score: 4, Interesting

      My major points are being able to play my music collection through the same box and MAME.

      I have a few hundred CDs sitting in boxes, I would like to keep them there and listen to the ripped versions.

      When somebody builds a box that can do both of those on top of what they do now, I'm in.

    7. Re:umm, price?! by mekkab · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So the big issues are: 1) having 1 box that does it, or 3 boxes
      2) components you already have

      Consider: 100 cd carousel, console with one of those "30+ classic atari games!", and an AV receiver to combine the sound sources (A, B, or A+B). (those carousels go for $60 these days, a console can go from $300 down to nothing if used, and a receiver can be anywhere from $1000 to under $100, depending upon your needs).

      If you already have a lot of these components, this set up can satisfy most of your requirements.
      But if you want this all on ONE box, then there is only one way to go: Custom set-up.

      As for the computer solution, playing ripped music (Wavs, Flac, MP3, WTF) and playing MAME are not really processor intensive- so whatever machine you have lying around might be great. All you need is a half decent sound card (if you don't need Dolby 5.1, then most cheap soundblasters will do ya!) and a half decent videocard with some TV out (does your TV take composite? Coax? S-video?). And an $80 harddrive from Compusa (maybe 2 if you don't go for MP3).
      So thats like, $250, $300 for HD, soundcard and video card?

      Which is cheap, but the above setup can be just as cheap.

      In this case, (no PVR) the Computer solution might be cheaper than a PVR solution (due to the limited demands on the computer) and it satisfies the 1 box requirement. So thats a win.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    8. Re:umm, price?! by cayenne8 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Yup...more flexibility as your hardware and software needs change. You can buy the extra stuff for the Tivo..to allow mp3 playing. However, on my media box I'm building (went for audio first), I can more easily control my rips...and their format. For my home system, I wanted lossless compression, so, I went for FLAC. This isn't an option on commercial systems that I'm aware of. And as the technology improves...I can upgrade as I please.

      So, it gives you much more FREEDOM now and in the future. When I get my whole system built some day...I can at will, stream my media around to anywhere in the house...house all my audio/video media on a central, backed up server...etc. Something I really don't forsee as options with a commercially available system. And...no DRM.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    9. Re:umm, price?! by __aafutm5472 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I disagree on asthetics, anyways. My main reason for building a HTPC is simple: I already have all the components through other means and aquisitions, with the exception of an LCD projector. $500 on eBay, and I have a full theater.

      I don't care about asthetics for two reasons: 1) the system will be behind the main seating area in a cupboard that's closed (but vented to avoid overheating issues), and 2) when I'm watching a movie, I'm actually watching the movie, not the equipment. Sure, when I get bored with a show, I may gaze at the equipment from time to time, but not necessarily when I'm at my own place. It's more to see what other people are using.

    10. Re:umm, price?! by Endive4Ever · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Warranties are for the kind of people who sidle into the repair shop with their plastic waving frantically.

      I specifically look for 'distressed' items and equipment when I am at the auction, because I know how to repair most of it and there are always the usual tards there who can't, so I get things for almost free often enough.

      --
      ---
    11. Re:umm, price?! by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Funny, I was ablwe to get a case (coolermaster HTC-620) for $80.00 the motherboard+processor for $90.00 a mpeg2 capture card (AverMedia M175) for $80.00 + a hard drive and spending only 1 8 hour period on a sunday when I would be screwing around anyways to install slackware+mythtv on it to get something that is 100% impossible with ANY purchaseable DVR on the market. the ability to export video to any format I want (xvid for my laptop mostly) or burn to SVCD/DVD for less than $350.00

      Yes I used a motherblard that has a soldered on processor... whoopdie doo. yes I have to use a $40.00 scan converter dongle that doesnt give me 1080i HDTV quality... but nothing else does and it looks as good as that TiVO it's setting next to (and is replacing)

      I suggest you get a better source for your hardware and make realistic decisions (128 meg of ram is PLENTY people! no you dont need 7.1 surround sound + 600 gig of hard drive space and 3.4 ghz processor)

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:umm, price?! by Thuktun · · Score: 2, Funny

      True, but you'll be able to modify and/or upgrade it any way you want, whenever you want, without worrying about the warranty (since there is none)...

      Once one voids the warranty by opening the unit, the issue of worrying about the warranty is neatly resolved.

    13. Re:umm, price?! by PunkKangaroo · · Score: 2, Informative
      I just barely built one for about $420 or so with the following specs:
      • AMD Athlon XP 1800
      • Some micro-ATX MSI motherboard (I forget the exact model)
      • 256 megs of RAM
      • Yuan MPG600 tuner/capture card
      • GeForce 4 MX440 (for TV out)
      • Western Digital 160 Gig hard drive
      • Antect Minuet micro-ATX case (it's a beautiful case and fits in perfectly in anyone's home theater)
      • Extra case fan and anything else I can't think of off the top of my head
      It's runs MythTV on Gentoo Linux and works perfectly (although it took some time to work out the bugs with the Yuan card). If anyone has a spare computer around give Myth a shot. It's a pretty impressive open source project. I've still got some stuff to finish configuring but before long I'll hopefully be playing Chrono Trigger with my XBox controllers after I looked up the weather and decided it was too cold to go out (but only after queueing up the television programs I want to record for the week). ;)
    14. Re:umm, price?! by Eccles · · Score: 2, Informative

      And you have a DVD burner lying around the house? Nice!

      It should be pointed out that ReplayTV and TiVo devices generally don't have DVD writers either. Even those that do -- for substantially higher prices -- may not allow much flexibility in editing or authoring the DVD. So if you're comparing build-your-own DVR to commercial ones, a DVD burner isn't part of the equation.

      That said, I capitulated and bought a ReplayTV, which my six year old uses with aplomb. (Her only disappointment was when I informed her that it did not have infinite capacity, and thus old shows weren't kept forever.)

      --
      Ooh, a sarcasm detector. Oh, that's a real useful invention.
  4. Well, why not? by 192939495969798999 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If you have the computer experience, why not build a Home Theater PC? It's fun to do (if that sort of thing is fun to you), and it *can* cost less than a commercial model with the same features, especially if you equip a lot of features into the system. Besides, if the PC can also serve as a PVR or other cool functions, then it's a doubly-good deal.

    --
    stuff |
  5. Article Text! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Building a Basic HTPC
    February 03, 2004

    Summary: You've read about building no-budget Dual Opteron workstations, and RAID-less storage servers and even air filters at FiringSquad. Today we'll be looking at Building a Basic Home Theater PC. If you're thinking Small Form Factor ATX, you haven't learned anything from our previous articles. This HTPC is designed for two purposes only: high-definition upsampling of DVD video and personal video recording. If you ever wondered how DVD's can look better when brought to HDTV resolutions even though the source is the same, read inside.

    IntroductionPage:: ( 1 / 10 )

    The HTPC or "Home Theater PC" is a popular but often nebulous concept. Everyone would agree that a fundamental component is that the pc be connected to a television but what the HTPC is used for is something to debate. Some people use a HTPC to play games on the big screen, while others see it as a way to enjoy high-quality DVD, others see it as a music/video/image jukebox, and still others see it as a way to get a low-cost HDTV by using a desktop monitor rather than TV.

    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner. Instead of starting off with a full-fledged HTPC, we're going to start with a very introductory approach to the HTPC and then through follow-up articles, add more features.

    For this introductory HTPC article, we have two very specific tasks: DVD upsampled to HDTV resolutions, and a personal TV recorder. Since we're "lazy," our HTPC needs to perform like a real piece of home theater equipment as much as possible. The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer. The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ** there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.

    Why these two tasks?

    We've designed this system as an ideal starting point for anyone with a "HDTV ready" television.

    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons. The most important factor is cost. Both TIVO and ReplayTV charge a subscription fee and ridiculous premiums for larger hard drives. With a PC, you can add and replace IDE hard drives on a whim and also enjoy free TV listings. In addition, it is possible to enjoy higher quality video through a PC-based system through improved video scaling than would otherwise be possible with a standard unit.

    Finally, ATI and other third-party software applications have media server applications that will allow their multimedia products to stream video to client systems on your desktop, and NVIDIA is expected to add this capability to its Personal Cinema line in the near future.

    The upsampled DVD is the more important feature in our HTPC today. Even if cost is no object, the HTPC approach to DVD can offer better picture quality than any stand-alone unit. DVDs are recorded with 480 lines of resolution, however it turns out that upsampling the video to a 720p or 1080i resolution for HDTV and HDTV-ready televisions will offer the best quality.

    It's a real phenomenon

    One of the most often confused concepts is the idea that upsampling DVDs to HDTV resolutions will make DVDs look as good as HDTV. It doesn't seem as if this is possible -- the data is not present to begin with. The real answer is that while an upsampled DVD isn't as good as true HDTV, it will look better than a straight 480 progressive lines of resolution. Here's why**

    HDTV-ready CRT

    Like a CRT PC monitor, an HDTV-ready CRT can sync at multiple resolutions. The catch is that the electron beam is not designed to change in size depending on the resolution (it changes but not by design). Suppose you have a 19" monitor running at 1280x1024 or 1600x1200. While reading this webpage, look at the white background. Get as close to the screen as you can to study the white. Now, change your monito

  6. Why? by scosol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Porn.

    --
    I browse at +5 Flamebait- moderation for all or moderation for none.
    1. Re:Why? by K8Fan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Porn.

      It's rated "funny" but it's actually true. There are porn companies now offering 720P, high-definition porn in Windows Media format. The only way to watch this stuff is via a HTPC.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
  7. DVD upsampled? by Brahmastra · · Score: 3, Insightful

    What's the point? 480P is converted to either 540P or 1080i in most HDTVs anyway.

    1. Re:DVD upsampled? by wwest4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      in the article, he argues that using a pc vid card provides superior upsampling. i don't know about that, but the other points regarding flexibility and bang-for-buck are pretty self-evident.

    2. Re:DVD upsampled? by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Interesting

      A lot of sets still accept and only display 480p directly witout scaling. I think most CRT HDTVs multiscan 480p and 1080i. Some plasmas are simply EDTV: 480i.

      For scaling, unless the set has a Faroudja FLI2300 chip, a newer Radeon will likely be at least as good.

      Few TVs have acceptable deinterlacing, but on video based material it is better than even WinDVD. Granted, most software DVD players suck - they are "bob" or "weave". but when patched into software like dScaler and ffdshow, they are better than most deinterlacing chips, and sometimes meet Faroudja's DCDi.

      I have a Holo3DGraph PCI card and the quality from even analog sources output to an older LCD projector looks phenominal, in part because the projector has a poorer scaler than the HTPC does.

    3. Re:DVD upsampled? by echo · · Score: 3, Informative

      I have an Infocus X1, and it has a the DCDi chip from Farouja in it. It upsamples 480p to 800x600 automatically, but.. here's the funny thing. 480i looks BETTER on this projector, because the Farouja chip does a better job of deinterlacing and inverse 3:2 pulldown than the "Progressive Scan" DVD player I have. So I don't even use 480p, I use 480i over component for DVDs and Composite from my DirecTV dish (the DTV signal is only 480x480 resolution mpeg-2 and look actually WORSE coming out the S-video jack, it emphasises the MPEG-2 compression and makes everything blocky on the projector.. Composite smooths those out because it's blurry)

      So the answer to the big question here is.. if you have a GOOD projector or monitor with a GOOD deinterlacer/scaler chipset, then you don't need a HTPC. If you don't, then a HTPC can get you good deinterlacing/scaling for your DVDs.

      BTW.

      http://deinterlace.sf.net for a Windows Deinterlacer

      or

      http://tvtime.sf.net for a Linux Deinterlacer.

  8. For me by Judg3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I do it for the challenges.
    Things like:
    "Build a HTPC into a VCR, and keep the original funcionality of the VCR"
    "Build a HTPC in my receiver, and make sure everything works" (Side note: That one was only sort of successful - had to remove the amp and use an external one, to much EMI)
    I do it because I like having choices, I do it because I like to be able to stream show X to TV Y or burn it to DVD.

    I do it because I'm a geek and a tinkerer, and it's in my nature.

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  9. No service fees? More features? by BagOBones · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Most of the DVR units out there come as part of a Satellite system or come with a subscription fee.

    You can make your own system with an on-screen guide, time shifting and the ability to play DIVX movies and games for rather cheap now.
    The retail units still don't play DIVX or Apple .MOV files well and are vary limited.

    --
    EA David Gardner -"... but the consumers have proven that actually what they want is fun."
    1. Re:No service fees? More features? by GrubInCan · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And no snooping.

      I caught the end of a segment on a news show explaining the stats on how many Tivo (I think) users had paused/replayed a certain item during the superbowl, including how many times they had replayed it.

      I didn't realize the PVR sent this sort of infomation back to the mother ship.

  10. I've been waiting a long time for this... by Trolling4Columbine · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ...and other "Why?" questions. For instance:

    wHY install Linux on an x-Box?

    WHY install Linux on a toaster?

    WHY make a cell phone so small that only an ant can use it?

    "Why" is such a great question, but unfortunately the only answer here seems to be "Because I can". Didn't science have a purpose once upon a time?

    --
    Socialism: A feeling of discontent and resentment caused by a desire for the possessions or qualities of another.
  11. Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by genixia · · Score: 5, Informative

    1) Play DVDs. More advanced features than standalone players, such as bookmarking (that allows you to skip that pesky 'forced' content), multiregion playback etc.
    2) Play games on a big TV with decent 5.1 sound.
    3) Play MP3s from a central server through your stereo.
    4) Used by people with high end projectors to deinterlace video signals.
    5) Confirm your geekiness.

    1. Re:Top 5 reasons. (in no particular order) by sporty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1. - you probably mean features more advanced than bookmarking. It really depends on what firmware is on your dvd player. Mine gives the option to set 5 bookmarks until i eject the dvd. Not the most ideal, but it works.

      3. - 1 stero cable from your computer to your stero system solves this w/o building a seperate dedicated machine. heck, it's the same thing w/ the difference of which machine does the work.

      5. - i post on slashdot already :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

  12. No Reason For It by derrickh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I got the idea into my head a while back that my PC would do everything. I'd have every piece of electronic and entertainment equipment in one box. I would be able to watch DVDs, TV, play CDs and MP3s, fake Tivo, Fax machine, answering machine all from my PC. All controlled via remote and piped to my TV.

    It would be incredible.

    Then I realized that I already had all of that stuff and it all worked perfectly. Just because you can do something, doesn't mean you should.

    D

    1. Re:No Reason For It by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Informative

      Then I realized that I already had all of that stuff and it all worked perfectly.

      And if you didn't already have all that stuff?

      Or if you wanted to tidy up your A/V rack? I count maybe six individual boxes that could be integrated into one box.

      For one thing, it ignores deinterlacing needed for HDTV. The minimum cost for a good standalone deinterlacer is about $900, a standalone deinterlacer + scaler: $2500. With a non-Booktree based TV card ($50) into an existing machine and running dScaler, you get most of that quality and a scaler.

  13. I can say the same thing about just about anything by bogie · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why build your own PC?

    Why build your own car?

    Why build your own house?

    Why do any of the above when you can just purchase the finished product outright which might be better than what you could build? Because we can.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  14. Re:myHTPC r0x by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    TROLL ALERT!!!



    wife!??! not on slashdot...
  15. Cost effective? by Otter · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having a PC-based TIVO is ideal for a number of reasons.

    Posters here seem to have demonstrated pretty clearly that even that's not close to cost-effective, unless you have almost all parts already and don't care about much of Tivo's functionality.

    You do this stuff for fun, not to save money.

    1. Re:Cost effective? by gatekeep · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It may cost a bit more, but I haven't yet seen a tivo that'll support more than two tuners (and that's only for DTV), scale to HD resolutions, allow for archiving to CD/DVD, Play DVDs, allow me to surf the web, read email, etc.

      An HTPC does a LOT more than a TiVo for only a LITTLE more in cost.

    2. Re:Cost effective? by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      An HTPC does a LOT more than a TiVo for only a LITTLE more in cost.

      That is, if you value your free time at $0.

      Yes, I can build a HTPC that does everything you said, and more, for only a bit more than a TiVo, but will it be as reliable? Will it be as user friendly (and not just to me! If my wife can't use it then it's worthless. If my visiting relatives/friends can't use it then it decreases in value somewhat)? How much time will I have to spend tweaking it? All just so that I can have it do everything?

      For some people this isn't an issue, because that's what they want to spend their free time on. Odds are they don't also do their own housework (both cleaning and repairing/improving), vehicle maintainence, etc. -- everyone picks and chooses what to spend their time and money on. This is no different.

      And can you even get HD satellite tuners for your PC? Seriously.

  16. HDTV Recorder by Glendale2x · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All the other functions of a HTPC aside, the PowerMac G3 I'm using does one thing I can't replicate with a one-box solution: it records HDTV over FireWire. A DVHS deck would cost me way more than the $100 + $75 FireWire/USB card I paid for the G3. Even then, the DVHS deck uses tape opposed to random access hard drive.

    It's not exactly a TiVo, but it time-shifts HDTV just fine. Since there is so little HD content anyway, I have no need for an HD TiVo anyway.

    --
    this is my sig
  17. Things I do with my HTPC by nate1138 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There are TONS of reasons to build one if so inclined. Here's what I do with mine:

    • Video capture from my DishPVR for conversion to DVD
    • DVD-Audio playback (Audigy2 supports all DVD-A formats, and has a 106DB s/n ration to boot)
    • Games rock on a 52" HD monitor
    • Terrestrial HDTV tuner
    • Upsampling DVD
    • MP3 jukebox
    • Divx/QT/Mpeg/whatever playback that my standalone player won't handle

    I'm sure given more time I could think of a few more, but that covers the majors. It wasn't any cheaper than a standalone unit for some of these functions, and it isn't quite as easy to deal with, but it was fun to build and tweak on. Plus it has the added benefit of being upgradeable.

    One thing that this article doesn't seem to touch on is noise. When I first built mine the noise was intolerable. I ended up having to replace the PS, CPU fan and case fans with quiet models, and lining the case with Dynamat to cut the noise down to where it didn't bother me.
    --
    Where's my lobbyist? Right here.
  18. Why can't it behave like a computer? by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The system should integrate itself seamlessly, and shouldn't force the user to think about it as a computer

    Why? Obviously, if one has the know-how to build such a system, they probably won't find it inconvenient to use it like a computer. I know that I'm like the fact that me "HTPC" doesn't act like a component -- and I appreciate the flexibility that a computer offers me. Anybody who needs their "HTPC" to act like a component is probably better off saving time and money by just buying a component in the first place.

    --

    -Turkey

    1. Re:Why can't it behave like a computer? by j-turkey · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Most people don't want a keyboard and mouse sitting in their living room, nor the awkward use that would come from it.

      Saying "that's why I have a remote" doesn't work either -- you get no more functionality from an HTPC remote than a component remote.

      I understand your point, as was the jist of the article...but this is Slashdot. I'm sure that there are a significant amount of Slashdot readers who feel that it's perfectly natural to use a keyboard and mouse in their living room.

      Secondly, I have a wireless remote for my computer from ATI, and it *does* provide more functionality than a component remote. It works as a wireless mouse, and has multiple buttons that will act as macros to do whatever I want (as well as each button behaving differently for different applications). I'm psyched to get my updated version in the mail -- it should offer even greater functionality.

      While this solution (and ones like it) are clearly not for everyone, most geeks don't have a problem with it. Most people who are willing to put together a system like this probably feel the same way I do. I find it more flexible than the alternative (a component system).

      --

      -Turkey

  19. We are geeks! by q-the-impaler · · Score: 2, Insightful
    What do you mean?
    The HTPC also has to have an advantage over a similar dedicated component ? there's no point in reinventing the wheel unless you can make it faster, smaller, and cheaper.
    The strongest point is that people just like to do it themselves. Whether it's a hobby, an instructional session, or just utilization of existing hardware, rolling your own HTPC is just what geeks do.

    Perhaps they didn't mean for this to be spotlighted on /.?
    --
    Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform
  20. For most of the world, there isn't a point by Em+Emalb · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Seems your average user doesn't care about any of this integrated pc stuff.

    They want their tivo, their dvd player, their vcr, etc.

    But the biggest problem, imo, (which some will say these pcs address cause of upgradeability) is that once you buy a combo setup system--tivo/dvd player/vcr/whathaveyou, you're "locked in" to that system for a while....people (such as myself) don't want to spend a gang of money constantly upgrading, or sitting there wondering how quickly the entertainment center will become obsolete.

    Once the tech gets figured out, I think integrated all in one systems will take off....anyway, my $.00000000000019

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
  21. Foreign Videos by Chibi · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This will only to appeal to a small segment of the population, but I speak from experience with anime (this could apply to any foreign works, though). There are times DVDs are released without subtitles in a language you can read or dialogue in a language you can understand. There are people out there (fans) who will go through the trouble of created timed subtitle scripts. So, if you have a PC and a region-compatible or region-free DVD player, you can enjoy this new video (which you payed for) with working subtitles!

    This becomes more interesting when you learn that a lot of entertainment goes through a localization process when they are being brought over to foreign markets. One prime example is how virtually every Hong Kong movie must have gangster rap in it... >_< So, sometimes people want to watch the original version.

    That's one advantage I can think of for HTPC.

    --
    If all you have are silver bullets, everything looks like a werewolf.
  22. Uhh.. Because you can? by the_skywise · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It was little more then 50 years ago that people could easily build their own cars.

    There's also a very strong community of personal aircraft builders. (I know one, it impresses the hell out of me that he's building this thing and intends to fly it.)

    I enjoy building my own PCs because I can pick and choose to my taste.

    Where do people think innovation comes from? Big corporations paying for new designs? The majority comes from people PLAYING with ideas and creating new things!

    1. Re:Uhh.. Because you can? by Sebastopol · · Score: 2, Informative

      Where do people think innovation comes from? Big corporations paying for new designs?

      Yup. Exactly how much design comes from a tinkerer in his/her garage? Nearly all but a small fraction of a percent of innovation and design comes from large corporations.

      Prove me wrong.

      --
      https://www.accountkiller.com/removal-requested
  23. Tell me about it! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I decided one day to build a machine that could do laundry, make be breakfast, clean the house, and give me a blow job... then I realized I already had a wife!

  24. Should be a computer, not a component by glinden · · Score: 2, Insightful
    • HTPC should integrate act like a component not a computer.
    I don't understand this. You have a fully functional computer. Why not use it like one?

    The attraction of a HTPC for me is that it can do a reasonably good job playing DVDs and recording TV (replacing a dedicated DVD player and TiVo) and also function as a full computer, allowing me to browse the web, read e-mail, work, and play games. In particular, playing PC games on a huge 80" projection screen with a surround sound system is pretty sweet.
  25. Not a very insightful article by GreenCrackBaby · · Score: 5, Informative
    The problem with having a HTPC doing multiple tasks is that it becomes more difficult to integrate the software and yet your wallet gets thinner and thinner.


    Last year I found myself with an old AMD 800mhz PC, missing just the monitor (total value probably $100). I also have lots of divx movies. Converting the movies to MPEG, splitting them, and burning them to CDs so that I could watch them in my DVD player was a pain. Watching them on a computer was even worse. So, I hooked up my PC to the TV, put the PC on my wireless network, and now I have a "HTPC". Total cost to me -- $40 for a wireless network card.

    Now I'm in the process of installing MythTV on that PC (total cost $200 for a encoder/decoder card), and I'll have an awesome PVR without having to pay any monthly fees.

    There's no reason that your wallet needs to get thinner and thinner. If you are interested in a PVR (ie. Tivo), then you actually save piles of money by not having to pay the monthly Tivo fee.
    --

    "The market alone cannot provide sufficient constraints on corporation's penchant to cause harm." -- Joel Bakan
    1. Re:Not a very insightful article by GrigorPDX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      not having to pay the monthly Tivo fee

      This is an important point. While the out-of-pocket costs may or may not be less, the freedom from monthly fees is a significant incentive.

      I despise recurring fees. When given the choice between a lower-cost porduct with a recurring charge or a higher-cost one-time purchase, I will invariably choose the latter alternative. Why rent when you can own? Even if the cost to build it yourself is significantly more than the cost of a similarly-featured commercial solution, how many months of subscription fees will you have to pay before the actual cost swings the other way?

  26. There is a better way by konfoo · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Antec case is too big, it falls off the back of your other home theater components. And why use a Radeon? Who wants to *only* upscale DVDs to HD resolution? Isn't the point of watching HD being able to receive HD broadcasts too?

    Alternative configuration:

    Mini-ITX system (the case will fit on top of the TV) like those from casetronic.com, with a VIA 800 or better.
    MyHD HD Tunerboard (will upscale DVDs and tune HD/SD broadcasts).
    VGA to component breakout cable connected from the MyHD's output directly to your set.

    Install XP or 2K, put the MyHD IR control app in the winblows startup folder, and never look at the windows desktop again, since the MyHD has an OSD on the HD output.

    With this config you can tune HD broadcasts and upscale DVDs for less.

  27. Not only price! by TrollBridge · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Exactly what are you putting together for $200 that you think can substitute for a $2000 system?

    Are you going to watch DVDs on a 17" monitor?

    Are you going to use your $50 3-piece Altecs as a sound system?

    The fact remains that the components of a home theatre that CAN'T be integrated into an affordable PC are going to be the majority of the system's cost anyway. So then the question remains: Why?

    --
    There's a Mercedes gap too. I want one and can't afford one, but it's not government's job to do anything about it.
  28. Re:What I want to do is use my monitor... by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the way it works is, when you buy a set-top box, it's a pretty standard piece of kit. When you buys one, you calls up your satellite provider, having plugged it in, read them off the serial number, and the number of your LNB unit, and they authorize it in their system.

    Well, get a card, plug it into your pc, call them up, give them the serial number, and you're off to the races.

    I think. Not sure.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  29. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by El · · Score: 2, Informative

    I seriously doubt if anybody has a monitor bigger than my 42" HDTV-ready projection TV... plus, using a computer as a platform usually means you have to put up with fan noise; it should be possible to build a consumer electronics device that silent (although Sony seems to insist on putting fans in theirs).

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  30. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by UrgleHoth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why build your own PC?

    Why build your own car?

    Why build your own house?

    Why do any of the above when you can just purchase the finished product outright which might be better than what you could build? Because we can.


    For you, the resolute do-it-yourselfer, may I recommend the Dentist in a box

    You thought I was joking? its for real, folks

    --

    Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  31. Makes Sense for Most Geeks by Spencerian · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I own a Power Mac G4 MDD 2-processor system connected to an Apple 17-inch digital LCD display. On it, I have the TiVo-like device EyeTV, which allows me to watch conventional cable or antenna TV, and record any show, allowing me to save the programs later, burning them to DVD, as a QuickTime movie, or as a Video CD.

    So, I've been waiting for video cards with HD tuners to arrive. It's inevitable. For one, getting this for me will be cheaper than getting a full HDTV for the time being, because I will not want to skimp on the type and size of TV I want for the household. Another reason is that my computer's screen, while not perfect as Apple's 23-in HD Cinema Display, is suitable enough for a clear, digital signal.

    I suspect that El Gato or other companies will make and sell HD tuner video cards that also support conventional stuff (VGA, conventional TV tuners, etc.) just for the geeks. Most normals will simply drop into Best Buy, buy a TV, and be done with it. For me, however, I want all the mods, baby, and the ability to burn, burn, burn. A conventional HDTV, no matter how nice it looks, can't do it, and I don't want to add yet another computer connected to it to try to get recordings. I'm a one-computer kind of guy in daily use (though I collect plenty of them for nostalgia).

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  32. I've been using mine for around 7 months by Lord_Pall · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So i've been running an htpc for a bit, and i love it.

    In fact, even my wife loves it.. which is a feat

    I used it for mp3 playback, streaming mp3's, dvd upsampling and playback and television watching. I use a 100 hour directtivo for pvr stuff.

    It's an athlon 1800+, 512 megs of ram, radeon 9000, guillemot soundcard with hacked drivers running optical out to the receiver

    It's in an antec sonata, and is using zalman cooling stuff for everything.. the vidcard has no fan.. That machine is quieter than the tivo.

    It's all running vga straight back to an infocus x1 projector showing on a 92" vutec silverstar screen

    I control it all with a gyration ultra mouse/kbd combo

    Software wise, i use zoomplayer with the cinemaster video codecs going through ffdshow for dvd playback and dscaler for tv watching. It's all running xp professional because i'm not particluarly linux savvy.

    That setup has replaced my television completely. dscaler does a wonderful job of managing the tv signal, and zoomplayer is just phenomenal.

    When we did LOTR:TT extended cut, i ripped both discs to the hard drive, added in trailers on the front end, psa's from the 60's, and spliced in a 10 minute dancing candy intermission in the middle.

    Just hit play, and it goes magically.

    The only complaint i have is the lack of useful hdtv cards. You can receive ota signals, with minimal pvr support, but that's it. Nobody supports signal over cable lines, or anything fancy.

    I assume i'll need some sort of gray market hardware in the future to do that..

    Oh yeah.. the total cost of all of this was less than a decent lcd hdtv set.. and you get a whole lot more..

    If you can't convince you're wife/significant other with the raw windows/linux interface, look at some of the frontends. I used myhtpc (myhtpc.net) for a bit, and it was first rate..

    I abandoned it since my wife is savvy enough to figure it out herself..

    For more info, go to avsforum.com and read their htpc forums.. or linux htpc forums as you desire..

    Highly recommended.

  33. Gee, what can an HTPC do that a console can't? by ClioCJS · · Score: 2, Funny
    • Let me surf for porn on my 36' TV. This alone should be enough to convert anyone. No need to read the rest of this post.
    • Let me create hundreds of different playlists for my mp3s, rather than burning them to disk.
    • In the rare event of missing a tv program, I can download shows in various obscure codecs (realplayer, xvid, divx5.latest, etc) and watch them on my 36' TV.
    • I can record video straight to AVI, using the capture codec I choose, the compression codec I choose, and the digital image processing plugins that I choose. No PVR gives you the flexibility of virtualdub. I compress shows to 150-400M apiece, and fit far more minutes of video on a 4.5G DVD-R than a standard DVD could ever hope to hold. (Yes, some quality loss, but MUCH better than VHS, and cheaper.)
    • No more buying blank VHS tapes either.
    • I can play Quake3 on my 36' TV.
    • I can record myself winning my favorite PlayStations game, then serve it up for downloads (okay, pulled that one out of my ass).
    • I can backup dvds and play the backups on the same screen (my 36' tv) that my dvd player (my ps2) is hooked up to.
    • I can play dvds much more reliably than with my PS2.
    • I can run emulators and play Atari, C64, etc, on the big tv, not on the lil monitor, as they were meant to originally be played.
    • I can choose my own OS. Can you tweak a hardware based player in the same way?
    • Upon system failure, I can simply replace the failed component rather than the whole thing.
    • By setting up Girder to control things via InfraRed remote, I can not only control my stereo, tv, and channel changing with my remote, but can also start/stop windows media player and basically use one remote for everything -- even pressing "ESC" or nudging my mousepointer around. Girder (www.girder.nl) and the IRMan (www.irman.com) work great together.
    • Last but not least: I AM A GEEK. I ALREADY OWN A COMPUTER. I WILL ALWAYS OWN A COMPUTER. Why pay extra for something that does what my computer can already do? HARDWARE PLAYERS ARE DEAD. GIVE IT UP FOLKS. IT'S A DYING BREED. Jump of the wagon NOW!
    --
    -Clio
    Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
    Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  34. The real reason? CONTROL! by eddiegee · · Score: 2, Insightful


    The article is a good primer on why to use an HTPC. I just finished putting together a Home Theater mainly for watching DVDs. The PC is outputting to a Sanyo Z1 projector which is 960x540 native to a 95" diag screen. With an HTPC I can make sure that the PCs output is EXACTLY the right resolution and refresh rate, completely bypassing any resolution scaling that the Projector will do. With anamorphic DVDs and using Powerstrip, Zoomplayer and FFDShow (under Windows, sorry *nix guys!), I can upsample DVDs to play in 960x540 and tweak the image so that my HTPC outputs a picture that will rival $2000 pro-level DVD players. An HTPC will also allow for outputting true 1080p (mainly through WM9, ugh...). Its not trivial to set up, so a complete newbie may be better served with a nice set top DVD player. But if you want excellent output for cheap, go HTPC!

    BTW, I'd love to do this under Linux, but havn't found a player that has the crazed level of customization that Zoomplayer/FFDShow has. Any suggestions?

  35. Re: Have a look at this: Media Ready 4000 by w3svc_animal · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Video Without Boundaries, Inc unveiled the "Media Ready 4000" at the most recent COMDEX..

    Link: "Media Ready 4000"

    They are calling it an "interactive convergence product...hmmm - All I'm looking for is a way to centralize the media functions (i.e. DVD, MP3, etc) so I don't have to blow the speakers in the den to listen to a song while I'm in the pool...

    In all honesty, I think it has 95% of the features most /.ers are looking for, albeit it lacks the DIY aspect.

    The website says it was scheduled for Release in Dec 2003, but I've yet to see where I could buy one... Anyone know where I can pick one up?

    --

    Error encountered in IAWebSig.clsSig.Create: Last Procedure: sPrc_Ins_tblSig

  36. Re:I Suppose it could be better than TV by justMichael · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can get a quiet PC, you can find one here

  37. Re:I can say the same thing about just about anyth by chaotica1974 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why build your own PC?
    I built my HTPC with an Athlon 2600, 1 gig ram, 240 gig of drives, ATI 9600 (HD Output), Hauppauge vid capture for under $1,000. I got to rewind and pause Janet's boob all I wanted and Tivo never knew.

    Why build my own car?
    Ummm, exactly how many people are doing this? I haven't seen that many home built ones on the road. Restored yes, home built no.

    Why build my own house?
    So I can configure room layout, ceiling heights, carpets, windows and all the extras that don't cost much to change *before the house is built*

    Why do any of the above? Because I just ain't average enough for the prebuilt stuff

  38. The flexability.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    1) Time-shifting rented DVD's is nice (I don't always watch them right away).

    2) Time-shifting TV is the ONLY way to go.

    3) Music ripper/jukebox with fancy visuals is nice.

    4) Mplayer compatible video player works out great for viewing new episodes of Red vs. Blue.

    5) Web browsing.

    6) DVD burning.

    7) Expandable.

    8) Upgradeable.

    9) Skinnable.

    There are certainly a couple of trade-offs, like those times you realize xmltv needs to be upgraded AFTER you've missed recording your favorite program. But if your a Slashdot geek these problems should be right up your alley. Anyone belly aching about the cost or convenience of a HTPC is probably not up for it. But for those of us who are, the additional features and flexibility will trump any store bought PVR any day (and if it doesn't, well just write the extra software!).

    Note to potential HTPC do-it-yourself article writers: Use either Mandrake, Gentoo or Debian (if your new to Linux or don't like configuring things yourself: Mandrake). You'll save a lot of time because you can install all the neccisary packages to run MythTV from a single command (ie 'urpmi MythTV' if you've set up PLF or Thacs rpm archive). Its REALLY not that difficult, but if you don't enjoy this sort of project (challenge?) why waste your time. Btw, Hauppauge's WinTV-250 is the way to go (at least for the MythTV project).

    --
    Quack, quack.
  39. Why I Built My HTPC by BRock97 · · Score: 4, Informative
    When I first looked into buing the components to power a HD monitor (i.e. a 65" HD TV with no tuner), the equipment would have cost me over $800. I would have needed an OTA (off the air) tuner, a progressive DVD player, and all the cabling to hook these things up. Plus, the stand alone DVD player wasn't very customizable.

    Finally, I settled on buying a computer to do all of this. I had quite a few of the parts I needed; the only thing I was missing was an OTA tuner card, the DVD software, and the sound card. I already had decided on Windows XP (which I will explain below), so I was set.

    The DVD software I went with was called TheaterTek and the benefits it had over a standard player are numerous:

    • Ability to resize any move to any resolution including 1080i
    • Ability to expand the movie to get rid of the black bars around the edge (i.e. anamorphic widescreen)
    • Ability to save these changes for each individual movie
    • Using Windows to further enhance the output using various filters (i.e. fdshow filters)
    The output from this setup was incredible. Watching DVDs at 1080i with the image cleaned up is so much better than 480p. I highly recommend it.

    The other problem was getting the actual HD content from the main networks. Locally in Omaha, NE ABC, CBS, and NBC have been broadcasting in HD for a while, so an OTA tuner was the way to go. A stand alone box was going for $600 locally, and I had found a card that does it for $200, the MyHD OTA Tuner Card. The picture quality is incredible and the performance was great on my 850 Duron. It gave me everything the set top box would have done and also Tivo like functionality out of the box, something that still isn't available for HD yet.

    As I mentioned before, I went with Windows XP as everything mentioned above is only available for that platform. Also, due to the mature video drivers on Win32 vs. Linux for the ATI card I went with, I was able to tweak more aspects of the output to the HD monitor through a program called Powerstrip. I tried DVD playback on Linux (mplayer), but it had no where near the functionality of the Theatertek software. Also, I did look into the pcHDTV card available, but it isn't nearly has mature as it should be for a commercial HD tuner card (the only user fiendly app I have found, MythTV, has very limited integration with the pcHDTV card. That is changing quickly, though).

    All in all, I highly recommend making a HTPC if you have the time. Plus, you don't need that Microsoft Windows Media Center Edition crap to make it work, just plain old XP will do you fine.

    --

    Bryan R.
    The price of freedom is eternal vigilance, or $12.50 as seen on eBay.....
  40. I don't understand by Srividya · · Score: 2, Informative

    The author says this HTPC does what Tivo does, but it cannot. It does not have software to download television listings and intelligently parse them based on user preferences. This elaborate P.C. setup cannot be told to even do basic Tivo tasks such as "record all showings of my favorite show".

    This is not an equivalent device.

  41. Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by melevitt · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The number one reason for me to build my own Linux-based PVR is privacy.

    Did you know that Tivo tracks not only what shows you watch, but exaclty what parts of shows you replay or skip over?

    Now, I know it's *supposed* to be anonymous. And I do believe them when they say they aren't selling the data *at the moment*.

    I also know they have systems in place to anonymize the data.

    But can you (or Tivo) guarentee that they will *never* be bought out be someone less ethical?

    Can you guarentee that Tivo won't get a new CEO who decides selling your viewing habits to direct mail advertisers is more lucrative? (Imagine if Darl McBride went to Tivo instead of SCO).

    That's my biggest reason for me to put together my own PVR.

    Of course, there's also flexibility. I get to decide exactly what capabilities I want, not the marketing department of a profit-motivated company.

    1. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by TrevorB · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Proof this is already happening:

      Janet Jackson most watched moment among TiVo users

    2. Re:Privacy, Privacy, Privacy! by Zathrus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did you know that Tivo tracks not only what shows you watch, but exaclty what parts of shows you replay or skip over?

      Yup.

      Now, I know it's *supposed* to be anonymous.

      And if you read the posts by people who have investigated this it is anonymous. The data that contains key presses, show info, etc. is sent without any identifying information whatsoever. TiVo has further stated that the data is stored in completely separate databases that have no interfacing between one another.

      And you can always call them and opt-out entirely if you want. It's been confirmed that when you do so the data is never sent at all. (Which would make it very difficult to track)

      But can you (or Tivo) guarentee that they will *never* be bought out be someone less ethical?

      Nope. And if that happens then we'll simply have to see if they change the privacy policy, and what changes are made.

      Can you guarentee that Tivo won't get a new CEO who decides selling your viewing habits to direct mail advertisers is more lucrative?

      Won't happen unless they're bought out -- which is the only way the privacy policy can change in such a drastic manner.

      The paranoia over viewing habits is really quite amazing. I really don't care that much, particularly since it's anonymized. Shrug.

  42. Not so redundant by DumbSwede · · Score: 2, Informative
    To the moderator(s) who marked this redundant: I am at work right now, and the site linked to is blocked. This is the first complete post of the article text and is much appreciated (one earlier failed to get the complete text). As often as sites get slashdotted and go down, it is prudent for one or two of the early posters to post the text (which is often all we are interested in without all the bandwidth hogging ad stuff).

    Since this was posted A.C., it doesn't appear to be a case of Karma whoring, and even if it where, I would gladly give up the mod points to view the article.

    Chances are the moderator(s) who marked the parent to this post redundant, will not see this comment of mine. But I for one appreciate the effort to include the text so all can see. Perhaps the moderator(s) thought the text had already been posted in full (it hadn't). Even so, this was a very early post and should have been given the benefit of the doubt that earlier article text postings hadn't shown up yet.

    Save negative mods for when they are really needed.
    Like the guidelines say, focus on modding up.
    Thankfully, most moderators modded this up informative, not redundant.

    1. Re:Not so redundant by ncc74656 · · Score: 2, Informative
      To the moderator(s) who marked this redundant: I am at work right now, and the site linked to is blocked.

      The downmod is most likely the result of this childish tweaking:

      "However the monitor is designed to resolve a higher fnord resolution..."

      "Despite the fnord heat issue with we liked the Overture..."

      "When watching TV at 480p, the ATI doesn**t improve fnord upon the standard TV tuner. "

      (I've seen worse in copied articles before, but that doesn't make this less annoying.)

      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    2. Re:Not so redundant by WM_NCDESTROY · · Score: 2, Funny

      You see the Fnords? your conditioning must be wearing off. Remember: IF YOU DON'T SEE THE FNORD IT CAN'T EAT YOU, DON'T SEE THE FNORD, DON'T SEE THE FNORD . . . The Illuminati must be trying to Immanentize the Eschaton!

      --
      posted via satellite
  43. Will $700 get you HD recording without an HTPC? by raygundan · · Score: 3, Informative

    Just barely. An HTPC really is a good deal, depending on what you're trying to do.

    It depends entirely on what you want to do. Consider my situation-- I had an HD-ready set, and wanted an OTA tuner and the ability to record HD broadcasts digitally.

    Like a lot of people around here, I had an old PC laying around doing nothing. I bought an HDTV tuner card for $120 (used, new would have been $199) and stuck it in. Now I can record 10 hours of HDTV, and tune my local stations. A standalone tuner box would have been a minimum of $300, and the ability to record (maybe with a digital VCR) would have been another $300.

    The MyHD MDP-100 tuner card has the nice side effect of being able to play back DVDs, and upscale the output to 1080i or 720p digitally. And because it's a hardware MPEG card, it doesn't need much of a system to run it. A PIII and 128MB of PC100 is well more than it really needs.

    It wasn't $700 or $200, though-- it was $120. Aesthetically, it fits entirely behind the TV, and the one case fan isn't too noisy. Because I only use it for 2 or 3 shows a week, it's off the rest of the time and noise is not an issue.

    Down the road, I'll build a better system-- but heck, even at $700, it beats out a 1080i DVD player (or standalone scaler and normal DVD), OTA HD tuner, and HD recording solution price-wise. A $30 ATI dongle lets me play PC games on the big screen in HD, too, so add an XBox with a component kit to that list.

    They really can be price-competitive with a lot of other things, and a good quiet case and heatsink with underclocked CPU can really give you some advantages you can't get without spending a TON of money to do it another way.

    When the HD Tivo is $300, *then* I'll have something to switch to. (but it still won't do the games, DVD scaling, or archive the HD shows to Xvid or WM9-- so my HTPC will probably soldier on.)

  44. Can TIVO do this? by Anita+Coney · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here is my DVR system. Actually, it's two systems. My DVR has a 1.4 Athlon, 256 megs of RAM, 10 gig HD for apps and OS, 80 gig for MP3s, 160 RAID-0 partition for recording, 120 HD for video storage/playback, and an ATI All-in-Wonder 8500DV. It's connected under the floor to the TV/receiver in my living room. Thus, you cannot hear it from the living room.

    My second system is a cheap PIII 550 with an 80 gig HD. It too holds my MP3 collection and is primarily for playing music. However, it too is connected to the living room TV and reciever and can play previously recorded content via the network. Thus, when the DVR is recording something, I can still play music or watch shows.

    Also, the music computer has two soundcards. Winamp uses my Audigy2 and everything else uses a cheap Hercules card. Thus, I can even listen to music while someone else is watching a recorded show!!!

    Also, that music computer is wired to nearly every receiver to the house, so I can listen not only from the living room, but from the kitchen, bedroom, etc. (I'm working on getting the bathroom's wired with speakers.) And I should point out that ATI's Remote Wonder works throughout my huge two-story farm house.

    With my homebuilt DVR systems, I can do the following:

    1. Record shows, edit out the commercials, and burn them to DVD.

    2. Pause, rewind, and fast-forward live TV.

    3. Know what's currently on TV and what's coming up. (With ATI's Guideplus/EasyView software, included with its All-in Wonder cards.)

    4. Access my entire 900+ CD collection in MP3 format from nearly every room in the house. (Via TightVNC.)

    5. Create a playlist of ALL my favorite songs, which I can access with one button from my Remote Wonder. That playlist is over four days long; it's like having my own radio station!

    5. Normalize the volume of my CD/MP3 collection via my Audigy 2 card. That's important. A roommate had one of those 200 disc CD players, but considering that nearly every CD has a different volume, I considered it worthless.

    6. Rip my DVD collection so I can play them back without all the FBI crap, from nearly every room in the house.

    7. And most importantly, I do not have to pay a monthy service, or have it randomly record shows it feels I might want to watch.

    Sure, my system probably cost a lot, (I built them both out of mostly spare parts) but considering it does exactly what I want and there is no commercially available alternative, I find it extremely valuable. Heck, even my wife can use it!

    --
    If someone says he and his monkey have nothing to hide, they almost certainly do.
  45. It's not cost effective unless we're talking HDTV. by raygundan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Plain and simple, tuning and recording HDTV is still freaking expensive. A $500 computer and $200 HD tuner card gets you all the functionality of:

    1. HD tuner (standalone cost, $300+)
    2. HD recorder/PVR (standalone cost, $400+)
    3. 1080i/720p DVD player (standalone cost, $250)
    4. PC games in HD on big screen (closest comparison is an XBox with an HD kit-- $200)
    5. A high-end scaler/filter box for HD video. ($500+)

  46. A simple addition to your setup to do both... by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your setup is very similar to mine. I use a MyHD card to output to the set as well.

    But I wanted the desktop, too. So I bought a couple of VGA->Component RCA breakout cables and set things up like this:

    Radeon HD Component Dongle -> Component RCA to VGA breakout cable -> MyHD VGA input

    and

    MyHD VGA output -> VGA to Component RCA breakout cable #2 (just like your current setup.

    All this does is allow you to use the handy source switching built in to your MyHD card to toggle between 1080i desktop from the Radeon, and 1080i video from your MyHD card. Works like a charm.

    Cables available here:

    Short cable for connecting your Radeon to your MyHD

    Long cable for connecting your MyHD to your HDTV's component input

    With a few cables, you can do what the above poster did AND still have your desktop. Pressing the "HD" button on your MyHD remote will toggle between desktop and video.

  47. Re:Getting video to the HDTV? by raygundan · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you only have component inputs, ATI's cards can output component HD with a $30 dongle you can order on their website. MMmmmm... giant HD video games.

    HD tuner cards with VGA outputs can be connected with a VGA->Component breakout cable, as long as your HD card supports YPrPb (normal VGA is RGB). All the ones I've seen that have their own outputs support this.

    My combo uses both, and connects the output of the radeon to the loopback input of the HD card (kinda like an old voodoo 3d accelerator) with another VGA->Component cable.

    I use a MyHD MDP-100, which they no longer make. But the MDP-120 will do the same. You don't need one of these at all to get desktop/game output, though-- just that ATI adapter. (which only works with ATI cards-- the reason it's cheap is that the card already supports component out. It's just a pin rearranger.)

  48. It is about the deinterlacer chipset..... by bodland · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Rather than computer. I did try though...in a quest for superior picture quality. I assumed that the computer would provide a better picture quality than my non-progressive scan DVD using the onboard iDCD Farjuoda de-interlacer chip set in my InFocus X1 projector. I was wrong. I did hook up my iBook to my MOTU 828 interface I use for music recording this was to get 5.1 audio out of the iBook. The MOTU has 24 bit decoders and optical out which went in nicely to the Sony amp. Anyway....from studying deinterlacers and how exactly DVD's are played back, mastered and what the aspect ratios and frame rate of film I concluded the quality of the DVD image resides in 1. the mastering technique, i.e. Film to digital transfer method used 2. The quality of the print used in the mastering 3. And the sophistication of the de-interlacing. Most progressive DVD players have deinterlacing chipsets that take the information from the DVD produce a progressive scan image. The quality and sophistication of these chipset varies greatly. Do some googles on "deinterlacing chipset". In addition they also provide proprietary functions to reduce and eliminate digital artifacts that are the result of image processing. When I used my iBook to play back the image I did get a higher resolution image but it was harsh and very non-film like. The deinterlacer built into the projector is designed to produce a "film like" quality to the image. Taking great pains to reduce the rainbow effect and other artifacts like pixelation, jaggies and chroma abberations that result form the hardware and convertsion. So keep in mind watching films on DVD's is a much different activity than watching HDTV. Film is an art is for the most part is still an analog process (barring the increasing number of digitally shot movies like 28 Days Later that was later converted to film) So having seprately engineered components to produce the appropriate signal is inherently going to be better. A DVD player to watch movies, HDTV tuner to watch HDTV and a monitor capable of producing quality images from a variety of sources is the way to go. That is if you are really picky about what hits the back of your eyeball.

  49. I'm almost there by humble_moon · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm building one as we speak, so I know a little more than most hearsay going on right now.

    For not much more money, you can have the same exact performance, plus the added bonus of _burning_ recorded tv to dvd/vcd..

    People saying it's expensive forget that as long as you have a hardware decoder, you're processor could literally be a pII.. hardware decoders do all the number crunching you need. the biggest requirement in this whole thing being a HUGE HDD.

    on to my setup, i'm using my actual PC for now, slowly gathering all the parts.

    heres why someone would do this insttead of tivo: (ms already knows this, hence MCE.)
    It's a tivo... it's a jukebox... it's a game console... it's A COMPUTER.

    sure, if you think of it as just a tivo replacement, it's one hell of an expense.. but if you think of it as a PC with about $100 exta dollas wrapped up in it, it's one hell of a deal. Plus its very cool imho

  50. Re:umm, price?! OK if you have server now. by citabjockey · · Score: 2, Informative

    So what if you already have a home server PC? This was my situation when I started to consider a tivo box. I thought it silly to have essentially two equivilant computers systems up 24/7. So I added the PVR function and TV video out to the PC.

    Asthetics are not an issue as the PC sits in a closet. I pass remote control commands to it via a IR->RF->IR remote extender. The system is *almost* headless except for the TV. I run a long s-video cable from the PC to the TV for display and run MythTV for the PVR function. All up, the cost of adding PVR capability to the system was about $200 -- which included a cheap tuner/capture card and a 180 GB disk. Myth gives me free schedule updates and a very cool web based interface for programming the recordings. Even my wife is happy!

    To do this from scratch is tougher. A budget for the system would be upwards of $800 or even $1000 to get a reasonable machine. Off the shelf may be better unless you already have a server. Take a gander at Here for pix of my *unfinished* HTPC.

  51. Flexibility of Linux in your living room by ptelligence · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sure you can buy a ready made solution, but what happens when the new tech comes out? Is it upgradeable? I had a spare box sitting around, threw Linux on it, got a $10 GeForce2 with TV-out off of eBay and made a pretty damn cool digital movie player that I can ssh into and sftp movies to and from. Not only that, but I can run picture slideshows or fire up Mozilla and hit Bit Torrent sites on a 27 inch TV. I haven't messed with MythTV or Freevo yet. I'm looking to get a WinTV PVR card and set up HD recording, but my drive is only 20 gig (It's what I had laying around)

    It's a great solution. My girlfriend and I watch tons of movies on it every weekend. We usually have 5 or 6 downloads going at the same time. I know its expandable for new formats and new means of acquiring media. Plus it never crashes ;) It's Linux! I'm now looking to upgrade the CPU because the movies are getting bigger and putting strain on my AMD 500. I fear that if I went with a proprietary solution, I'd be locked in. With this, I can build a cool case and keep upgrading here and there as I desire. I highly recommend it as a cool project that can be done at a very low cost.

    Sig? No thanks man, I'm tring to quit.

  52. You don't need top of the line by lorcha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Get a video capture card with onboard MPEG-2 encoding and you could build a MythTV box with a Pentium I ($130 for a Hauppauge-250 on ebay). Or better yet, get a video capture card with onboard MPEG-2 encoding and decoding ($180 for a Hauppauge-350 on ebay).

    Still think you don't have the spare parts lying around? You don't need much CPU power or RAM (256MB is plenty) if all the encoding/decoding is on the capture card. Grab a PCI IDE controller for $10 and a 200GB drive (I've seen 'em as cheap as $100) and yer' set.

    --
    "Avoid employing unlucky people - throw half of the pile of CVs in the bin without reading them." -- David Brent