Slashdot Mirror


AMD Receives $683M for Dresden Plant

Cocooner writes "Infoworld has an article explaining how AMD received $683 million in grants from Germany and the state of Saxony for its next-generation microprocessor wafer facility. The new plant will be located in Dresden, adjacent to Fab 30 and will be called Fab 36. It will be the first AMD 300mm manufacturing facility."

56 of 277 comments (clear)

  1. ROI? by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "The new Dresden facility ... will employ 1,000 local workers when it is completed"

    Why would the government give a $683M break to AMD to get 1000 jobs? That's two thirds of a million bucks per job. It's amazing that a $2B facility can be staffed by only 1000 people.

    -B

    1. Re:ROI? by Xeth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      That may seem initially true, but there are bound to me massive general economic effects from employing 1000 highly skilled workers and their families, and all the increased support business that would come up around them.

      --
      If your theory is different from practice, then your theory is wrong.
    2. Re:ROI? by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why would the government give a $683M break to AMD to get 1000 jobs? That's two thirds of a million bucks per job.

      Well, first of all it's in grants and allowances, so the governemnt probably doesn't look at it as "real money" - and I'm guessing it's probably spread out over a long period of time, ie tax breaks for the next x years.

      Secondly, they are probably figuring that the plant will make suppliers and customers of AMD move nearby, thus providing more jobs and taxes. It's debateable if this actually works, but that's probably their thought process.

    3. Re:ROI? by matze235 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have to agree. This is even more disappointing as the government is cutting social funds. Here in Berlin they are cutting the low-priced metro ticket for people with low income, investments in culture and education, etc.

      The economy lobbyists have such a strong influence on politics.. that's really sad.

    4. Re:ROI? by rif42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      employing 1000 highly skilled workers

      Most of these jobs will likely not need to have much special skills, chip fab work is in some way just another form of assembly line work. I guess it is at most 200 of them that needs to be highly skilled.

      Other than that I think your argument of an ecomony knock-off effect do hold.

    5. Re:ROI? by davegust · · Score: 5, Interesting

      they are probably figuring that the plant will make suppliers and customers of AMD move nearby

      Wafer fabs usually spend a relatively small amount of money in local economies. The bulk of the cost of a new fab is allocated to new equipment, which is mostly imported from the U.S. and Japan.

      Still, there are the 1000 local permanent jobs, local jobs for construction of the actual building, money spent by equipment vendors support personnel in hotels, local costs for water and power, and local taxes.

      A fun anecdote regarding water consumption: I write software for wet benches. I shipped a bug once to a fab in Phoenix that caused their DI water consumption to skyocket. The fab's DI water plant hit max capacity, and the City of Chandler had problems keeping up with the plant's consumption.

      Here in Boise, local philanthropist J.R. Simplot built the city a park with a dozen or so soccer fields. The real purpose behind this park - a place to distribute processed waste water from the Micron plant. Not that I have any problem with that.

    6. Re:ROI? by sjwt · · Score: 5, Insightful

      no, but the other 2billion Euro's that AMD is spending will stay in the german ecconomy..

      So the govermnet spends 600millon,
      to put a total of 2.5 billion in the ecconomy.

      you are right, its not 1 becomes 2,
      its 1 becomes 4.

      --
      You have 5 Moderator Points!
      Which Helpless Linux zealot/MS basher do you want to mod down today?
    7. Re:ROI? by HungWeiLo · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I apologize for not being able to answer your question. I live in the US, you see. I am not familiar with the concept of government incentives and payments in exchange for favors from the corporate sector. Not only that - I live in a state which will give 2+ billion US, free training to their workers, freeway expansion around their facilities, and a free cargo dock to our favorite corporate entity in exchange for 1,200 jobs. But since our state government knows best, it must be done because it has a tremendous ROI.

      --
      There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
    8. Re:ROI? by christophe · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >Why would the government give a $683M break to >AMD to get 1000 jobs? That's two thirds of a >million bucks per job. It's amazing that a $2B >facility can be staffed by only 1000 people

      Germans don't care about the 1000 people working there, they care about:
      - the other $1.4B that will come and will be spent in Germany for a good part,
      - the thousands people needed to build a high-tech plant,
      - the hundreds of firms and thousands people needed to provide (high tech) "raw" materials, and provide outsourced services to the plant (food, cleaning, software, maintenance, tools...) : do not forget that Germans are good at making tools and chemical products (which such a plant really need),
      - the money that will go through their banks,
      - the fact that this part of country really need jobs (previous Eastern Germany, 20% unemployment).

      BTW: If you have an opportunity to visit this part of Germany, do no hesitate. Dresedn was totally destroyed in February 1945, but the Communists really succeeded in building it again [about their only success], and the area is very nice.

      --
      Christophe (Don't hesitate to point out my spelling and grammar mistakes, I want to learn - Thanks).
    9. Re:ROI? by I+Be+Hatin' · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Not really, let's say they're each making 50k. 50 million a year. It stays 50 million a year, no matter how many people become the beneficiaries. Money isn't magical, one euro doesn't magically become two because another business moves into the neighborhood in order to serve the workers.

      And what do they do with that 50 million a year? Stuff it under their mattresses? No, they spend it in the local economy, buying food, clothes, etc. for their families... and the local government gets a cut via the sales tax. Further, this increased spending on necessities and luxuries of life spawns the need for new workers, who receive a paycheck... and the government gets a cut via the income tax. And with this money, they spend it in the local economy... and the local government gets a cut via the sales tax. And so forth. So yes, money is magical as far as the government is concerned, since they get a cut out of any transaction.

      Now, the above assumes that all new workers have to move to Dresden from other areas. But the same statements are true if the new workers are local residents who are receiving a lower salary (in which case it's less than 50 million, of course) or unemployed, which actually doubles the benefit, as they're no longer receiving public assistance.

      --
      I know god exists. I read it on the internet, so it must be true.
    10. Re:ROI? by Uber+Banker · · Score: 5, Informative

      No. You must be unaware of the 'multiplier effect' in economics, you can read up here. Basically, if there is surplus productive capacity in a economy (which Germany surely has) a stimulative effect at employing that surplus will have spill over benefit to everyone (chip makers need bakers, burger flippers etc) economically 'near' them. The money goes round the economic circle and multiplies.

      As Germany is in a depressed economic position (lots of deflationary pressures) such fiscal stimulus is useful (this was the argument for the Bush tax cuts - but that was probably unnecessary in the US (and was not 'directed' to undercapacity areas of the economy), but is much more necessary in Germany), not that this is a cure-all as German is suffering really bad structural problems too.

      Then there is the money multiplier concept (a not very good definition here) which explains how money increases as the definition broadens - is cash money, but the amount of money on deposit is greater than all cash in circulation and in bank tills This is a seperate issue and not relevant to this discussion, but a fine demonstation that of all things in life, money is one ofthe finest examples of something which multiplies.

    11. Re:ROI? by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But since our state government knows best, it must be done because it has a tremendous ROI.

      I too, live in Washington State. We have one of the worst tax climates for businesses in the country, hence Boeing's eagerness to relocate. Basically, we taxed the living hell out of Boeing. When they decidided they wanted to move, the state government gave them ridiculous incentives to get them to stay. But, it was basically too late anyway. Many of the jobs have already relocated to Chicago and Kansas. We'll just have a shell of what we once had. Idiotic beauracracies allowed the lifeblood of the Seattle economy to slip away.

      --
      If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
    12. Re:ROI? by gr8_phk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Remember, a large portion of that money will go straight into the local economy. Construction will be done by local companies. Only the special equipment will come from outside, and most of that will be purchased with other money. I bet most of the money will be spent locally, and when it's done, they'll have a nice new fab in town.

    13. Re:ROI? by RedSynapse · · Score: 2, Informative
      no, but the other 2billion Euro's that AMD is spending will stay in the German ecconomy

      I really doubt that. Most of that 2 billion will be going to companies like Applied Materials. Sure there will be local contractors involved in constructing the buildings (i.e. the grunt work), but all the really expensive bits that go inside will come from foreign multinationals.

      What Saxony is really paying all that money for is the creation of jobs. When you do the math 600k per job ain't all that bad. Lets say the average salary will be 50k per year, so in that case you could argue that "the local economy" will make that back in 12 years. The EU actually has rules against these kinds of state subsidies, but because the Fab is being built in former East Germany it's being exempted.

  2. Re:AMD 300mm? by scifience · · Score: 5, Informative

    No, it isn't a typo. They are talking about the size of the silicon wafer, not the processor itself. If you had RTFA, you would have known that the whole point of this is that is more cost effective to use bigger silicon wafers since more processors can then be made out of a single wafer.

  3. Re:AMD 300mm? by garethw · · Score: 4, Informative

    I know, it's a typo...

    Actually, it isn't. 300mm is the diamaeter of a complete wafer, from which multiple die are cut.

    --
    garethw
  4. Avoid production stop by rif42 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AMD, based in Sunnyvale, California, has no plans to convert its existing Dresden fab to 300 millimeters because it wouldn't be a cost-effective way to introduce that technology, Prairie said.

    Probably also because it would for a longer time block the main production facility for Athlon and Optoron chips.

    If you have many fabs doing the same kind of chip process like Intel it is much easier to temporary stop one of them.

  5. That's nothing... by Dan+East · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just look at how many people work at the International Space Station.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
    1. Re:That's nothing... by EggplantMan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Not only that, but those jobs sure as hell ain't local.

      --

      ?-|||-----x<*))))><
  6. What about returns ?? by shamir_k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How much new revenues will this new plant bring into Dresden? 600 million plus seems an awful lot of money to get just 1000 additional jobs.

    Unless the city going to get substantial revenues from taxes, or increased business opportunities for vendors, it seems like a huge waste of money.

    1. Re:What about returns ?? by tempfile · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Eastern Germany suffers from extreme unemployment (up to 20% in some areas) and has been in an economical crisis since the wall came down. The unemployment is the reason for the collapsing German welfare state.

      Creating jobs and building an industry should be the #1 East German priority. The government did the right thing.

  7. Re:Taxes... by Sumocide · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dream on, corporations of their size hardly have to pay taxes in Germany. Especially in the former GDR.

  8. Re:AMD 300mm? by Afrob · · Score: 5, Informative

    And because of their size these are called 'Pizza Wafers'.

    The die size of an Athlon XP is about 129mm^2, so at 3/4 surface usage about 410 Athlons would fit on a single wafer. Must be really cheap to produce those things...

    --
    -- www.linux-laser.org - Open Source Laser Show Software for Linux
  9. Socialistic contradiction of Free Trade. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is goverment intervention of the free markets.
    This is a threat to Globalism!

    The period between 1950 and 1973 was by far the most successful of the century. This was an era characterised by capital controls, fixed exchange rates, strong trade unions, a large public sector and a general acceptance of government's role in demand management. The average annual growth in "per capita real GDP" throughout the world was 2.9% - precisely twice as high as the average rate in the two decades since then.

  10. think back! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "...AMD received $683 million in grants from Germany and the state of Saxony for its next-generation microprocessor wafer facility."

    it's not like AMD is gonna change the money into
    euro coins and stack them to make a nice looking
    factory made from coins, no sir.

    the question really is:
    who owned the land before AMD bought it (tax?).
    who is building the factory(tax?).
    who is supplying power(tax?).
    who is building the generators that produce
    the needed electricity(tax?).
    who gets to have a peek at the technology (know-how) once complet(no tax!) :)
    who gets know-how for building a chip
    producing factory? (def. more to come!)
    etc.

    this is a micro investment and the reward is def.
    going to pay off as long as people have to use
    computers (e.g. no telepathy available).

    1. Re:think back! by michael_cain · · Score: 2, Interesting
      this is a micro investment and the reward is def. going to pay off as long as people have to use computers

      Sometimes these things work out, sometimes they don't. There is a growing body of evidence in the US that cutting sweetheart deals to bring in some corporate facility can be a losing proposition. This one seems of a managable size, but in cases of large facilities employing thousands, there can be serious ripple effects as the local governments must build new roads, new schools, expand water treatment facilities, etc. In many cases, the sweetheart deal means the billion-dollar factory is not paying local taxes to help fund those expenses. Nor is it just the workers at the facility whose taxes pay those bills -- everyone who lived and worked there before gets hit with higher tax rates. Some people -- locals who get employed at the new facility at higher wages -- are clearly better off. Some people -- local workers whose wages stay the same but whose tax rates are higher -- are clearly worse off.

      Here's an example. A few years ago, Denver, where I live, lost the bidding war for a new United Airlines maintenance facility to Indianapolis. The Denver paper recently ran a piece about how the deal worked out for Indianapolis. Most of the facility got built, and Indianopolis spent a boatload of money on infrastructure to support it. But United never actually started to use the facility -- so the jobs never materialized, the local property tax base has decreased because United doesn't pay those taxes under the deal terms, and Indianapolis taxpayers are out hundreds of millions of dollars spent on unneeded infrastructure.

  11. Re:In Socialist Germany by goldspider · · Score: 2, Interesting
    An excellent and oft-modded-down point!

    And to think of how socialists in the U.S. piss and moan when the federal government awards contracts to oil firms. Double standard, anyone? Who's to say that there's not something going on behind the scenes between AMD and Schroeder(sp)?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  12. Re:In Socialist Germany by selderrr · · Score: 4, Insightful

    it has been tried. it's called communism. it failed. miserably.

  13. In other news.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    The German VP of AMD was assaulted by President Schroeder who, according tohis own explanation, was "trying to kiss his boots".

  14. Re:In Socialist Germany by BenjyD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Because this way creates 1000 skilled jobs directly in the area, which increases tax income and reduces unemployment payments. The local economy is helped by the money from the jobs, other companies (builders, suppliers etc) in the area benefit. All round the area's economy improves. This is about long-term growth, not the short term benefits.

    It is the job of the government, after all, to improve the lot of its people.

  15. Re:lower costs vs. intel by Durinia · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If I remember correctly, the Intel 300mm fabs are just beginning to produce commercial chips (I don't remember which process they run). So, I don't think we've seen the effect of their 300mm fabs yet.

  16. Re:AMD is a charity ? by Selecter · · Score: 2, Funny
    before the last quarter AMD had not made a profit in so long poeple were starting to wonder if they would ever get back in the black.

    IF you want money grubbing execs, try Halliburton scheming with their best bud DICK Cheney to invade a country so they can rebuild it.

    1. Look around for new target in War on Terrorism

    2. DICK Cheney suggests Iraq. Bush goes "duh..OK"

    3. Invade Iraq. Destroy everything. Make sure the oil ministry is the only safe building in Bagdad. Dont guard anything else, no matter how priceless.

    4.?

    5. Halliburton execs openly sneer, point, and laff at AMD and their pitiful attempts to make money. AMD cannot invade anyone! AMD has no power!

  17. Fab 36 by VanillaCoke420 · · Score: 5, Funny

    So will 36 trendy gay men decorate the factory and have the workers wear something stylish?

  18. Mod down by imsabbel · · Score: 4, Informative

    The parent just pulled "facts" out of his ass.
    Opteron X -> isnt planed
    5Ghz Fsb -> Opteron has no fsb
    500mm -> even intel says that the next 5 years they wont TRY creating bigger than 300mm wafers,
    65nm -> 2008 65nm will be old stuff...

    --
    HI O WISE PRINCE. WHT TOOK U SO DAM LONG?
  19. Re:In Socialist Germany by JanneM · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, they aren't really giving money away to AMD. It is rather in the form of tax rebates and the like - it is not losing any money, just not bringing in as much as if AMD had paid full rates on everything (and the reality is that likely AMD would have gone elsewhere and not paid a dime).

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  20. Advancements are a wonderful thing by locutus2k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It is nice to see AMD expanding its company. I have been using AMD chips for several years now, and couldn't be happier. When a company spends the time and money to make developments in arcitecture, they should get something nice in return. Unfortunatly I don't feel intel has been making the advances. The Intel name has been carrying them for a while now, and its time AMD got their recognition.

    I've been using the Athlon64 chips and couldn't be happier. Hopefully the new plant will help them nibble away another part of Intel's market share.

  21. wafer size by Elracim · · Score: 5, Informative
    This page explains the difference between wafer sizes pretty well.

    www.tomshardware.com/cpu/20040201/prescott-05.html

    --
    All Rights Reserved. All Wrongs Avenged.
  22. Re:In Socialist Germany by JanneM · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You may "STRONGLY disagree" - but it is the will of the local population that sets the goals for any government.

    If, the voters does set the goal of it's govenment to be improvement of the lot of the people, then so be it. Who are you to disagree - unless you live there and have a right to vote, in which case you can make your views heard just fine.

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  23. Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I live in the North of England, and at least the AMD plant is still around and AMD is a German company, unlike the white elephant of Siemens.

  24. Re:In Socialist Germany by Slack3r78 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    No, it's a very poor point, and while I may not agree with modding down of it, it certainly isn't in any way insightful. To use a cliche : "Give a man a fish and you've fed him for a day. *Teach* him how to fish and you've fed him for life. Sure $600k/piece would be enough for "the same people who'd work there anyway" to live off of for a few years, but the money will do far more good creating jobs and stimulating the economy.

    Let me reiterate a point here: despite what Bill O'Reilly and Rush Limbaugh would have you think, socialism is not about getting something for nothing. The basic idea is to ensure that the whole of society is better off than if everyone were concerned only for themselves - sometimes that requires a lot of effort. As a bit of side commentary here, some of the more liberal European states are about as close to a workable, real world approach to socialism as is really possible.

    As far as a possible double standard goes, I think the case is pretty weak. The no-bid contracts you hear "socialists" (don't you mean commie-pinko scum? I don't think you were inflamitory enough there) complain about are because Bush, and particularly VP Cheney have VERY close ties to the companies that were awarded those contracts. And by close, we're talking about Cheney having been the head of one of these companies just prior to entering office. Show me where PM Schroeder and his cronies have a direct interest in AMD other than stimulating the German economy and you might have a point. Until then, you're just flamebait.

  25. It's rarely remarkable by Duhavid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when a US company builds a US factory.

    In the same way it would not be remarkable when a German company built a German factory, nor when an Indian company built an Indian factory.

    It is a bit more remarkable when the US business drones without brains build another facility outside the US, then complain that US consumers arent buying it's products. Everyone is worried about the "jobless recovery", but they fail to point the fingers at themselves for shipping the jobs ( and salaries ) overseas. Mind you, I am not nessesarily of the "protectionist" mindset, but it does seem that some moderation is called for.

    --
    emt 377 emt 4
  26. Re:Taxes... by he-sk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    That's right! Thanks to our center-left government, German Telekom (you know, T-Mobile) und Siemens (as in Fujitsu-Siemens) pay less in taxes than the janitors working there. And this is just the tip of the iceberg. Hurra to the forces of a free marked economy!

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  27. Glad they got a plant, by Archfeld · · Score: 2, Interesting

    even happier it was not near me..Horrible places that produce huge amounts of heinous sand some really AWFUL smells.

    --
    errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  28. Possibly illegal too by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why would the government give a $683M break to AMD to get 1000 jobs?

    The EU recently decided that it was illegal for local governments to subsidise private companies to do business in their region. Could be that AMD haven't quite thought this through...

    1. Re:Possibly illegal too by jarran · · Score: 2, Informative

      Governments can, in certain circumstances get permission from the EU for state aid to companies. (Not that I have any idea what those circumstances are. :) )

  29. Did nobody else do a double take? by surprise_audit · · Score: 4, Funny
    article explaining how AMD received $683 million in grants from Germany and the state of Saxony

    I swear, the first time read that I thought it said AMD was being given the state of Saxony along with a pile of cash... Shouldn't be reading this stuff after working through the night, I guess... :)

  30. Re:See, Communism works!! Thanks, Germany! by Elektroschock · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is nothing *unusual* to support investments as high as 2.5 billion. 20% is more or less moderate.
    This is usual economic policy in most states around the globe. Anti-Capitalists and Communists will critzise it though because they prefer state run chip production, haha.

    It's better than paying 520m to a patent privateer via a stated granted monopoly system. :-)

    But I believe a 600 Million German Free Software Fund would be a better investment.

  31. Re:In Socialist Germany by EinarH · · Score: 4, Interesting
    The concept of the classic welfare state (Germany, Denmark, Sweden and Norway) with socialism and a market controlled economy is not about taking away all off your return for hard work. It's more like the government takes a slice of it. So you won't get filthy rich if you work hard, you just get rich.

    And about the philosophy; even if you don't filthy rich most people have other motivations besides money for working hard. As long as people feel they get an appropriate share of the material growth they are happy.
    So I don't think much of the ambition is removed from the individual as there is no signs that the progress of society halts in these countries.

    --

    Melius mori in libertate quam vivere in servitute.

  32. Re:Taxes... by spike+hay · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Just be glad that they are easy on corporations. The German economy is headed for a slow, eventual decline due to deep seated structural problems. It will wind up much like Japan. Taxes are too high, and that discourages investment. Productivity isn't that high.

    Worse, to help offset the massive government debt, there is talk about raising pension contributions and corporate taxes. These will hurt the economy further, making the country less competitive and decreasing investment.

    Germany is falling into a trap. The people have been erroneously led to believe that the state can provide everything, which it cannot, at least in the long term. I don't quite think giving Athlon $683 million for a fab that will only be in operation for a few years is a good idea. But be glad that Siemans pays very little in corporate taxes. It keeps the jobs in Germany rather than in the U.K. or the U.S. You sure as hell don't need more people on the dole.

    --
    If you don't understand any of my sayings, come to me in private and I shall take you in my German mouth.
  33. Actually, no. by snarkasaurus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "It is the job of the government, after all, to improve the lot of its people."

    Actually, no. In a -free- republic the job of government is to manage the rule of law, provide for the common defence of the nation, and enforce contracts. Other than that they are supposed to stay out of the road and let people get on with their lives.

    Anything else is just the forced redistributuion of wealth,otherwise known as stealing. Which is why East Germany is such a basket case in the first place. People are not inspired to work hard when they know the government is just going to take their money.

  34. Good for the city by giminy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I lived in Dresden last year, and things haven't been too wonderful there since reunification. Lots of people have been leaving the city to head west, where there are better jobs. The city of Dresden actually pays people 300,- just to move there from other parts of the country (I think some other cities in the eastern part of the country do this as well). That money will easily cover the first month of rent in most areas of the city -- everybody I met would pay about 150,- per month.

    That said, this will certainly help bring a little more 'balance' to the country (the Dresden VW plant also helps). 1000 high-paying jobs means potentially 1000 families...lots of little kids that need schoolteachers, food, clothes. I'm sure that the AMD plant will bring in way more money than this in taxes after a few years anyway...

    --
    The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  35. Old news, and they got more by Rufus211 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Wow this is old news. We knew this when they first announced the plant. And here are some more figures:
    AMD has arranged external financing and government support of approximately $1.5 billion during that period. The external financing is expected to include up to approximately $700 million in loans from a consortium of banks, including an 80% residual guarantee from Germany and Saxony, approximately $500 million in anticipated grants and allowances from the Germany and Saxonian governments (pending European Union Commission approval), and up to approximately $320 million in equity funding from Saxony and a group of European investors led by M+W Zander.
  36. Re:Taxes... by he-sk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Germany's economy is stagnating, because money is being wasted by corrupt politicians and greedy corporate managers. Note, that Germany is right now richer than it was ever before (along with the rest of the western world) as expressed by the GNP. Right now, some unionists are rallying behind warning strikes, because the metall industry is offering an 1,2 increase (just around the inflation rate, after years of no increases), but only if the employees accept an unpaid increase in the working hours from 35 to 40 hours a week.

    Now, what is wrong with this picture?
    a) The employers want the unionists to accept less money for more work
    b) Requiring individuals to work more time while we have 11% unemployment and more part-time work would significally decrease unemployment
    c) The average income has decreased in Germany in the last 10 years, when you account for inflation, while the income of top managers has increased more than tenfold
    d) All of the above.

    I'm not promoting Socialism, at least not in the way it was done in the GDR, in which I was born by the way. I'm promoting transparent and democratic decision making processes which is currently not happening in the system we have here. I'm also opposed of putting the economy above all, especially above the interests of people that are actually in need.

    I have no sympathy for this system at all, because I had to find out that all the things I once cherished after the Wall came down in Berlin, eg free speech, privacy laws, free demonstrations, and all that liberty stuff, aren't worth the paper on which they are printed on. As soon as you're critical to the system and claim your rights, you get bullied around by police and the media doesn't care at all. And I have a feeling that the corporate sector is the driving force behind this, too.

    This is getting OT.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  37. Re:Taxes... by he-sk · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I forgot:

    I'm not against private property and a capitalist system, I am however deeply concerned, that huge corporations and few individuals accumulate too much power simply because they are insanely rich. I think this has already happened.

    By the way, in ancient Sparta, when a person became to wealthy (and thus too powerful) it was exiled. Think about it for a second.

    --
    Free Manning, jail Obama.
  38. May they have better luck than Eugene, Oregon did by theycallmeB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As soon as I saw the first thing I thought of was Hyundai/Hynix and some of the other Enterprise Zone projects started in Oregon in the mid-late 1990's.

    The Enterprise Zones were areas designated for industrial development that would receive special tax breaks for the first five years or so. It looked really good on paper, and politicians could say they were doing something about the high unemployment, which looked really good to them.

    The two biggest projects were a CD-pressing plant owned by Sony in Springfield, OR and a DRAM plant owned by Hyundai in Eugene. Both were touted as creating lots of high paying jobs. Both actually were fairly good corporate citizens while times were good. A politically significant (~1000 total) jobs were created in the $9-10/hour range, though most of the engineering and management positions were filled by people brought in from out-of-state and out-of-country. A third company moved into supply packaging materials to Sony. Everyone was happy.

    Then the economy went south. Hyundai canceled a planned expansion of its plant, went bankrupt, closed the plant for over a year while they upgraded the equipment after negoiating a multi-year extension to their tax-break package, then finally re-opened employing fewer people then before. When Sony couldn't get their tax-package enlarged and extended, they just up and left, as did the packaging company.

    The final blow was when Komag, maker of hard-drive platters (and recipient of the smallest-subsidies) went bankrupt, sold-out its equipment and walked away from a once billion dollar facility that was one of the last plants making platters in the US (at least I think that is what the newspaper said).

    The Enterprise Zone program is still on the books, but with a change in focus. Instead on trying to lure big companies to build big, they are rewarding smaller, more local companies who expand their operations. While companies like Sony received almost as much in tax breaks as they paid out in wages, the smaller firms generally receive tax breaks equal to 1-2 years wages for the additional jobs they create. The additional profits remain in the local economy and these local companies are less likely to up and walk away when the mood suits them. It doesn't make as good a press release, but is much more effective.

    All in all, I hope Germany has better luck with AMD than Oregon did with its multi-nationals, but they should look at better ways to spend future tax-grant money.

  39. Flamebait my ass. Explain this one, moderators. by JonTurner · · Score: 2, Funny

    Clearly, my understanding of what constitutes flamebait is much different from whoever happened to moderate this one! For my benefit, and the benefit of /.'s future posters everywhere, somebody please explain to me why my comments were considered "flamebait -1". I thought, if anything, it'd be regarded as insightful.

    It's a simple fact that Germans are, by way of their taxes, subsidizing the cost of these chips -- Germany's government is giving huge amounts of money to AMD to establish their plant and that portion of the construction costs won't be charged to the non-German consumer.

    What about that is flamebait? Or is anything even slightly anti-AMD (or anti-communism, for that matter) considered to be one of those "holy" topics that one is not allowed to discuss here?

    Unless someone can explain this one, I'm going to have to assume the latter which simply makes the moderators intellectual cowards.