Slashdot Mirror


Worst Terms of Service Ever

Popageorgio writes "Yale's Lawmeme features the most oppressive, paranoid web site TOS ever, found at the Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum. 'Additionally, in the event that your actions in violation of this User Agreement result in our being deprived of our exclusive rights . . . you agree to pay us liquidated damages in the amount of five million U.S. dollars . . . . You agree to use only the provided permissions e-mail address (or other e-mail links on this website, as appropriate) and not to telephone us or content contributors with permissions or other requests, nor to attempt to circumvent the provisions of this agreement, and telephone calls placed in disregard of the foregoing will be charged at two hundred fifty dollars per telephone call.'(Emphasis theirs)." The museum acknowledges this is crazy, too -- read on for more.

The legal birdseed here (appropriately and manically illustrated in the manner of The Secret Guide to Computers) makes the copy on Dr. Bronner's Soap look sane; the user agreement ("Click on any link or image to indicate "I ACCEPT" the USER Agreement.") begins with a little blurb about why it's necessary, and asks you not to be put off by the legalese. That might seem disingenuous at first, but buried in the text is this note, too: "[Yes, we know that you think that all this legalese is completely ridiculous, and we think so too, but we also believe that current law unfortunately requires that it be done this way; So if you know of a better, simpler 'legally correct' way, do tell us how!]"

(Besides this amusing legal stuff, the site is actually very interesting, at least if you enjoy U.S. history and trains.)

45 of 401 comments (clear)

  1. Oh, The Temptation by The+Dobber · · Score: 5, Funny

    Think I'll call em from a pay phone, just for shits and giggles

    1. Re:Oh, The Temptation by DigiShaman · · Score: 0, Funny

      Better yet, call them from the SCO office. I would LOVE to see the fallout from this!

      --
      Life is not for the lazy.
    2. Re:Oh, The Temptation by Gothic_Walrus · · Score: 5, Funny
      No...you're doing it all wrong.

      Want to call? Call collect from a pay phone. Now that would be fun...

      :)

      --
      Goo goo g'joob.
    3. Re:Oh, The Temptation by identity0 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no, don't pay the bills yourself - have someone else do it!

      Call up SCO, and tell them "I want to tip you off that there is a large number of unlicensed SCO/Linux boxes at the Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum. Call (phone #), and ask them for licenses - in fact call them repeatedly, they may pretend to not know what you're talking about."

      Hilarity ensues.

  2. Hrmmm... by Ooter · · Score: 5, Funny

    Are you sure this isn't the SCO Museum (which is hopefully soon to come)?

  3. COLLECT by MonkeysKickAss · · Score: 2, Funny

    how about 1800collect or 1800 callatt

    --
    MonkeysKickAss
  4. My Favorite: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Do Not download or copy any images from this site.
    Fortunately I didn't violate this part as I use lynx
    for all www browsing. Others who use MSIE, Netscape/Mozilla,
    Opera, ICab, etc. can't say the same though.

  5. But... by iammaxus · · Score: 4, Funny

    telephone calls placed in disregard of the foregoing will be charged at two hundred fifty dollars per telephone call.
    ...
    So if you know of a better, simpler 'legally correct' way, do tell us how!"


    So I'm going to have to pay $250 to try to help them?

    1. Re:But... by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      telephone calls placed in disregard of the foregoing will be charged at two hundred fifty dollars per telephone call.

      I wonder if I could place this note next to my name in the phone book.

      Go ahead and violate the terms of my EULA you telemarketing bastards! ;-)

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
  6. Oh shit... by gt25500 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Do not download or copy images from this website!<--- In CAPS too :o

    Can anyone recomend a good lawyer?

    --
    _________ Help me get a PSP!
  7. That TOS is WEAK! by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's nothing in the TOS about slashdotting the site. If they really cared, it'd be in there.

  8. Reporting Errors by osmodion · · Score: 5, Funny

    "You agree to immediately notify CPRR.org by e-mail of any errors, ... or any other defects or deficiencies which you discover on this website . . . ."

    Should I tell them about the TOS?

  9. Too much time on their hands by tscholz · · Score: 5, Funny

    That is the longest TOS page I have ever seen. Looks like they have used more time on the TOS, than on the rest of the site.

  10. I should be racking up money.... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 3, Funny

    since all of you unsuspecting /. ers have agreed to my license terms muhahaha

  11. Re:Hold up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I always "Tab" to the "Click Here to Accept" link and then press "spacebar", thus passing by the whole "clicking" issue altogether.

  12. As of 8:16PM EST on 2.7.04.... by Flavius+Stilicho · · Score: 2, Funny

    There were 724,970 Visitors since 2.15.99.

    As of 8:16PM EST on 2.8.04... they're going to need a bigger hit counter.

  13. The TOS covers everything by jdkane · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... except re-posting some of the TOS on other sites like Slashdot.

  14. Too long... by Da+Weave · · Score: 2, Funny

    With a TOS that long, who has time to check out the rest of site?
    and no, I didn't RTFTOS, not completely at least.

    --
    "In post 9-11 soviet russia, only beowulf clusters of welcomed overlords are belong to old grit-eating Koreans!" aendeur
  15. Re:Hold up by jonfromspace · · Score: 5, Funny

    I don't click links anymore, I type them into IE!

    Sorry /troll

    --
    I am become Troll, destroyer of threads
  16. Johnny Cochran by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    The chewbacca defense r0x0rz y0ur b0x0rz

  17. Re:Hold up by crabpeople · · Score: 4, Funny
    cleaver, but your still clicking keys.

    i just say 'tab, tab, tab, tab, space' into my voice recognition software and viola!

    --
    I'll just use my special getting high powers one more time...
  18. Re:Your Soul by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 2, Funny

    and by clicking agree, you agree with full knowledge that you give up your mind, body, soul, finances and all property wether physical or intellectual, to the owner of (insert product or website) to do with as he/she pleases

    don't you have to sign that to enrole at most universities?

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  19. Re:Hold up by yourmom16 · · Score: 2, Funny

    But your speech is a superposition of clicking noises, as any continuous sound wave(that is one that does not involve teleporting particles, or infinite forces) can be expressed as a superposition of sound waves that on their own would be clicking sounds.

    --
    "We have got to make Stan understand the importance of voting, because he'll definitely vote for our guy." - South Park
  20. Re:Hold up by bluGill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe, but my Atari400 with that membrane keyboard finaly has one good point: it doesn't click. (of course I had to void my warrintee by disconnecting the speaker to get it to stop clicking, but now there is now noise. I suppose the 90 days for a computer manufactured in 1981 is long gone though)

    Now I just need to hook it up to the web... Doable, but many web pages are more bigger than my ram.

  21. Re:Parody by PacoTaco · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sometimes I think our entire legal system is a functional parody.

  22. A Shorter TOS by woluwedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Your f*cked if you've read this! (under 13's friendly version)

    --
    Down with sigs
  23. Re:Hold up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What? Your voice reocognition software plays a stringed musical instrument?

  24. Re:Hold up by kisielk · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think he means that he speaks in to his viola. Definitely a strange way to interface with a computer.

  25. Oh YEAH?! by Hwatzu · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm going to change my hostname to "you_agree_to_let_me_take_any_image_from_your_site .by_including_this_host_in_your_logs_and_permittin g_me_to_connect". If it shows up in their logs, it's conclusive proof that they wanted me to take things from their site.

  26. Re:Hold up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    But if I don't accept the agreement, then I also am not accepting that clause that says clicking on a link accepts said agreement.

  27. Re:Hold up by dekashizl · · Score: 4, Funny

    i just have my thai hooker click ACCEPT for me. she's under 18 and not even a citizen, so i'm pretty much in the clear.

  28. Re:Hold up by nomel · · Score: 4, Funny

    what if he left his keyboard out in the rain. Then it would be an "act of God".

    "In the news, the Central Pacific Railroad Photographic History Museum is sueing God for a breach of contract."

  29. Click on the link to see the agreement... by fireman+sam · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought by forcing a user to agree to an agreement that could not have been viewed before agreement would cause the agreement to be void.

    In this case it states "Click on any LINK or image to indicate "I ACCEPT" the USER Agreement." Where User Agreement is in fact a link. Hence, you have agreed to an agreement which you were unable to view before agreement.

    This is the same as placing stickers on CD/DVD roms stating "by opening this packet you agree to the enclosed User Agreement". The user agreement then would go on to say "...You are to sacrifice a virgin on every full moon (or in the case of /. users, themself on the first full moon)"

    --
    it is only after a long journey that you know the strength of the horse.
  30. Re:Hold up by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 5, Funny
    my Atari400 with that membrane keyboard finaly has one good point: it doesn't click. (of course I had to void my warrintee by disconnecting the speaker to get it to stop clicking

    Oh man, just POKE 65, 0

  31. Commercial licensing of images. by jms · · Score: 2, Funny
    The best part is the parts that talk about how you can license images from them for commercial purposes:
    By submitting your request for permission or permissions inquiry, you are obligating yourself and your organization(s), if any, to license, immediately pay for, and to actually make use of the image(s) or other content requested in the manner as set forth in your application, should permission be granted.
    ...
    Abandoned application fee: There is no application fee, but you will be charged a one hundred U.S. dollar non-refundable abandoned application fee per e-mail for EACH AND EVERY E-MAILed "Request for License to Reproduce Still Images," permissions inquiry, follow-up, or other permissions related e-mail that we receive from you that fails to ultimately result in your licensing at least one image or other requested content, including but not limited to e-mails related to image selection, questions, billing, and collection of fees, except that no abandoned application fee will apply if you submit a complete application in your first e-mail but none of the images that you request are available for licensing. Also, we may, at our sole discretion, deem your application to have been abandoned and charge the abandoned application fee if you fail to respond to each of our e-mails within 72 hours, if you reject a license which we approve in response to your request, fail to make timely payment as required herein, or tell us that you do not want a license.
    Ok, that's obnoxious and draconian. But here's the real kicker. The part that made me almost keel over with laughter
    If a requested image is of lesser quality than another similar available image, we may, in our sole discretion, substitute the better quality image.
    Translation: If you even ask us about licensing an image, you are obligated to pay us for the image. Then feel free to sit back, cross your fingers and hope that we decide to give you the image you paid for, instead of another image that you don't want or need.

    I mean, holy freaking shit!

  32. Re:Hold up by Grey+Ninja · · Score: 2, Funny

    Soo... umm.... just for the sake of advancing my own knowledge of course... whereabouts do you find these underage thai hookers?

  33. Re:Hold up by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Funny

    Thailand maybe? Just a guess.

    --
    Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
  34. Re:Hold up by tsa · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wow, there should be a '+5, nerd' option for the moderators!

    --

    -- Cheers!

  35. Re:Hold up by fucksl4shd0t · · Score: 2, Funny

    If you add on line 3,567 in comments.pl the following line:

    #@*&^ if $#KDjk^es '+5, Nerd'

    Then you'll have it!

    --
    Like what I said? You might like my music
  36. Re:Hold up by Planx_Constant · · Score: 2, Funny

    Only on /. could a post stating that Thai hookers come from Thailand get rated "+1 informative".

    Although I do think the sarcasm is funny.

    --
    Heisenberg might have been here.
  37. alrighty then by sacrilicious · · Score: 3, Funny
    i just have my thai hooker click ACCEPT for me. she's under 18 and not even a citizen, so i'm pretty much in the clear.
    not so. she's an agent to whom you have given actual authority. you--as the principal--are therefore responsible for any contracts that she enters on your behalf by clicking "accept."

    Ok, then I have my cat walk on the keyboard. My cat is definitely not a citizen, and I'm pretty sure he's under 18 (at least he LOOKS under 18), and he's never been to law school so I'm willing to bet he couldn't be formally have authority as principal conferred on him in a way that I couldn't somehow contest. Of course if the cat decides to roll over and testify against me it could get ugly. I'd probably give him a good spraying with the hose.

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  38. Re:Hold up by grammar+fascist · · Score: 5, Funny
    If you add on line 3,567 in comments.pl the following line:
    #@*&^ if $#KDjk^es '+5, Nerd'
    Then you'll have it!

    And what do you call that language? "Cuss"? "Programming With Expletives"?

    Oh, wait. That's perl.
    --
    I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  39. Re:Gratitude by Kredal · · Score: 2, Funny

    AAAHHHH! You sent them an unsolicited email! You could be liable for thousands of dollars in damages! Quick! Hire a lawyer!

    --
    Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
  40. Re:stupid terms of service and the court by caluml · · Score: 2, Funny
    if someone had a contract that required an illegal activity (like human slavery or prostitution)

    Damnit - lucky for me the chains won't let her get to the computer to read Slashdot...

  41. Re:Hold up by dar · · Score: 3, Funny

    hmm, would that make God your agent?

    No. God is my co-pilot.

    --
    My other Slashdot ID is much lower.