Slashdot Mirror


Preempting Hailstone Formation To Protect Cars

Makarand writes "Nissan has become the first automaker in the United States to start using a device that suppresses hail formation to protect its fleet of new vehicles from hailstorm damage. The device is a cannon capable of shooting sonic waves upto 50,000 feet in the air to keep hailstones from forming. The device comes with its own weather radar and activates when it detects conditions favorable for hail formation. The device can provide hailstorm protection in an area with one-mile radius by firing sonic waves every five seconds."

102 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. Sonic cannons are useless technology by fo0bar · · Score: 3, Funny

    What is not mentioned in the article is that this sonic cannon was sold to Nissan by Toyota, who knew that the technology is useless against the latest fleet of Goa'uld motherships.

  2. hmmm by zojakownith · · Score: 5, Funny

    Now they just need sharks with frikkin' radar beams.

    --
    I have bad karma....

    Open source is heavenly, Microsoft is the devil, SCO is going to hell

    1. Re:hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      *Making quotation mark gesture with hands* "LASER"

  3. sound fishy to me by Barbarian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud, which for one probably buffers the sound. Also, is 120 db really that loud compared to the localized sound from a single lightning strike?

    Sounds to me like these guys got taken. It's pretty hard to prove that you prevented hail, just as it is hard to prove that you created rain.

    1. Re:sound fishy to me by Bastian · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I don't think it has to do anything to the thundercloud. If I remember right, hailstones form as the water falls from the could, not inside the cloud itself.

      I'm assuming that the sonic pulse is supposed to somehow agitate the falling water to keep it from forming large ice crystals so they melt once they get to the lower (and warmer) atmosphere. Or something like that. I'm too lazy to read too deeply into the company's website.

      Either way, they claim a 100% success rate, and if Nissan is willing to buy them I imagine that they have evidence to back it up. It doesn't seem that it would be impossible to prove the product works - most hailstorms are larger than the 0.3 mile radius effective range they claim. If you can repeatedly show hailstorms with a small hail-free patch surrounding the device, I'd say there's significant evidence that this isn't just a bunch of baloney.

    2. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You obviously aren't a farmer. And as for proving it works my crops are standing and the ones on the farm next door are torn to shreads.

    3. Re:sound fishy to me by futuramarama · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well, if thats 120 db of any Britney song, its bound to have the hail running for the hills.

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
    4. Re:sound fishy to me by kinnell · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud, which for one probably buffers the sound

      120db is the sound measured on the ground next to the device. The sound is almost certainly focused upwards, which means it will be significantly louder above the device. As for the cloud absorbing the sound, well that's how it works.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
    5. Re:sound fishy to me by GuidoDEV · · Score: 5, Informative

      Hailstones form inside the thundercloud, and grow larger as they are suspended by the thunderstorm's updraft or recycled through it. Clear ice in a hailstone corresponds to growth in warmer regions of the cloud where the water has time to flow before freezing, cloudy ice corresponds to ice formation in colder regions of the cloud where the water freezes on contact.

    6. Re:sound fishy to me by b4k4 · · Score: 5, Informative
      If I remember right, hailstones form as the water falls from the could, not inside the cloud itself.

      Hail forms when a raindrop freezes inside a cloud, but shoots back up (due to massive updrafts), and falls back down, gaining more layers of frozen rain/ice. It continues this cycle until the ball of ice is too heavy to be lifted by the updrafts, at which point it falls to the ground as hail.

    7. Re:sound fishy to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, if it kills enough birds then their pulverized bodies will protect the cars. When the hail stops all you have to do is brush off the carcasses.

    8. Re:sound fishy to me by Molina+the+Bofh · · Score: 4, Interesting

      A better explanation of the process can be read here.

      --

      -
      Roses are #FF0000, Violets are #0000FF, find / -name '*base*' |xargs chown -R us && mv zig greatjustice
    9. Re:sound fishy to me by LennyDotCom · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Is that 120 db pulse every 5 seconds really going to do anything to a giant thundercloud

      When I spent my summers as a kid in italy on the farm when ever it looked like hail I would hear a booming sound like cannons. My mother told me it was the cannons that they fired into the clouds to stop the hail from knocking the grapes off the vines.

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    10. Re:sound fishy to me by Jeremiah+Cornelius · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Fish?

      It's the BIRDS that you'll be smelling...

      The ones that aren't killed, will surely dump a load on the roadway.

      --
      "Flyin' in just a sweet place,
      Never been known to fail..."
    11. Re:sound fishy to me by tenchima · · Score: 2, Funny

      Grapes

      --
      If at first you don't succeed, so much for skydiving.
  4. In other news... by andih8u · · Score: 4, Funny

    They found the device to be effective against hail, but couldn't figure out the recent surge in bat dropping related damage.

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
    1. Re:In other news... by steve_l · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This is funny.

      In the book 'the skunk works', one of the pilots in the stealth fighters in the first Bush gulf war describes how before the war began they used to go to their hangars in the morning and find the planes surrounded by dead bats.

      There were a lot of bats in the area, and the design of the fighters meant they not only didnt reflect radar, they didnt reflect sound. So these bats would be swooping around what sounded like an empty hangar, when suddenly they'd run into an invisible force field that would injure or kill them...

  5. Actually... by Lshmael · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ..it is mentioned:
    They won't say what it cost, but admit they won't really know if it works until there is a hail storm over the plant.
    1. Re:Actually... by HTH+NE1 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damn...wondering if I can take up a neighborhood collection to get one of these!!

      Forget hail; imagine opeating this horizontally! Take out the neighborhood, open up some scenic views.

      --
      Oh, say does that Star-Spangled Banner entwine / The myrtle of Venus with Bacchus's vine?
  6. Link to the probable manufacturer... by Sponge! · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    Sponge!
    1. Re:Link to the probable manufacturer... by phayes · · Score: 4, Insightful

      In the linked site, they "include a waranty, providing indemnity for losses and damages to assets in case that the Ollivier Hail Suppression System(R) does not function properly".

      In other words, you're replacing your insurance policies with their warranty. Depending on the reliability of their financial resources & how much these sound cannons cost, this could actually save money for Nissan even if it doesn't work (as I assume).

      --
      Democracy is a sheep and two wolves deciding what to have for lunch. Freedom is a well armed sheep contesting the issue
  7. They forgot to mention the downside... by crayz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...instead of having hail fall on your car, 747s do.

  8. News? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is common practice around my area (Christchurch, New Zealand) to protect pip fruit and grape crops from hail damage. I'm frankly surprised this is news.

    1. Re:News? by nettdata · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's interesting... I'm in Canada, and my Dad was born/raised on a farm, and yet I'd never even heard of the concept, never mind the actual implementation of this.

      I've actually found it to be one of the more interesting articles on ./ in a while.

      Can you hear the things from where you are? Do they have much of an impact/annoyance-factor for people living in the surrounding areas?

      --



      $0.02 (CDN)
    2. Re:News? by DutchSter · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I remember when I was taking my intro to weather classes, we discussed such a device. The Russians used to try something similar in an attempt to break up thunderstorms. The idea was basically the same, just shoot something up into the cloud and disturb its ability to hail. Problems with this device fell into three major categories:

      1) Didn't work at all.
      2) When it did work, all it did was move the storm out of range of the device. Once out of range, the cloud would dump twice as much on the unprotected area. This gets really political when farmer John is flooding farmer Bill's field two miles down the road.
      3) Lots of dead wildlife (birds).

  9. as proof by Barbarian · · Score: 3, Informative

    Let me post this (ganked from another site):
    [blockquote]Basically, the anti-hail cannon uses
    acetylene to shoot cations into the
    atmosphere at sonic speed, which creates
    shock waves that interfere with the
    crystallization of ice, thereby resulting in
    rain or sheet, but not hail. It covers a
    circular area of about 0.3 mile radius,
    roughly 200 acres.[/blockquote]
    This sounds like a bunch of baloney to me. "Shoots cations" is as ridiculous as when you hear hippies talking about "bad ions" and "good ions" with respect to some stupid lava lamp.

    1. Re:as proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      right. because you know more about the field from your cursory search than the people who researched it and the people who spent millions of dollars to install it.

      skepticism is fine, you just have to use more proof than "this sounds like a bunch of baloney". cations are real you know.

    2. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      "Shoots cations" is as ridiculous as when you hear hippies talking about "bad ions" and "good ions" with respect to some stupid lava lamp.

      Ah, but unlike 'good ions', cation has a proper scientific meaning. Cations are simply positively charged ions. As they're charged they're fairly easy to direct using magnetic fields and *waves hands* what-not. An example is a helium nucleus, which has a charge of +2, also known as alpha-radiation. So, some smoke detectors work by 'shooting cations' across a small gap.

      Of course, the problem with this is that alpha-radiation is stopped by a few centimetres of air, and larger particles are probably even less effective. I've no idea if they actually 'shoot cations' thousands of feet into the air or not - it seems more likely that a large charge would propagate through the air, without any individual particle travelling very far, if they could produce enough of a potential difference.

      I wouldn't say it's baloney but it does sound somewhat exaggerated.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    3. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmmmm. Hang on - lightning occurs when there is a great potential difference between the cloud and the earth, right? So as the cloud is getting ready to shoot negatively-charged particles downwards could you shoot positively-charged ions upwards?

      To answer my own question, I think there'd be a great risk of triggering a lightning strike by doing this, so you're probably right :)

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    4. Re:as proof by eraserewind · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, almost every household equipment in Japan is sold with the tag "minus ion". [mai-nas ee-on] I had never heard of minus ions doing anything interesting as regards your house, until I got here. Seems that they are supposed to be good for your health (as everyone except me obviously knows).

    5. Re:as proof by GuidoDEV · · Score: 4, Informative

      The electromagnetic forces inside a thunderstorm are mind-bogglingly intense because of the fact that air is such a great insulator, so shooting ions more than a few meters into the air, let alone into the bowels of a storm, is not something that sounds at all feasible to me. I suppose it might be possible to induce a lightning strike as the ions build up near the unit (whether actively through intervention or passively through natural forces is probably a matter of debate), but then as soon as it gets hit its "usefulness" will quickly come to an end anyway.

      As an aside, lightning is generally believed to occur due to charge separation inside the storm due to cloud microphysics, with positive charge accumulating near the ground, possibly partly due to friction from rain. What actually triggers the lightning strike is unknown, though one theory that has recently been gaining some traction proposes that cosmic rays cause a sudden breakdown in the electrical resistance of air which rapidly snowballs (over the course of a fraction of a second), allowing lightning to occur. Obviously things are a bit more complicated than that, but it's way O/T to get into the nitty-gritty details, which I'm not overly familiar with anyway since I haven't read the papers detailing said theory.

    6. Re:as proof by Wanderer2 · · Score: 5, Informative

      This irritated me so much I looked it up. From HailShield.com:

      The HAIL SHIELD generator, provides a shock wave that is projected toward the hail baring cloud with a 4000 lb. thrust. The waves are successive, a shot is fired every 5 1/4 seconds, and creates a new 'shock wave' each time. These waves grow in diameter, and spread out to cover one kilometer in diameter immediately above the generator. As the generator heats up, it allows the shock wave, 'torre', to pick up positive ions, and carry them up into the cloud. These positive ions help destabilize the hail formation. The cloud becomes homogenized, and can no longer produce hail while in the shock zone. The shock wave can be seen in the early morning, or in late afternoon. It looks like a heat mirage, that we see on hot surfaces. The shock wave also has a very definite sound. After a cannon shot, or bang, you will hear a very high-pitched whistling type sound, leaving the mouth of the generator. This is the shock wave. The shock wave has been detected as high as 50,000 feet.

      and

      The generator works exactly like a shot gun. When it is fired, it gives a two ton thrust at the area of most resistance, the butt. The two tons of thrust can not pass through the butt, so the thrust reverses, and goes out through the barrel. This is the 'BOOM' that we hear. When the explosive force goes upward, it creates a vacuum, that opens the two check valves that are built into the butt. These check valves open and draw air into the generator. This air follows the explosive thrust at super sonic speeds. When directed by the barrel, this air becomes the 'Shock Wave', that you can see and hear a few seconds after the initial 'BOOM'. This is repeated every five and quarter seconds.

      So there we have it. They do move cations into the atmosphere, but they don't shoot them out of the cannon.

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    7. Re:as proof by hraefn · · Score: 2, Funny

      thereby resulting in
      rain or sheet


      Greeeaat... sheet falling from thee sky... Nissan has gone loco!

    8. Re:as proof by sjames · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Actually, it was the U.S. Navy that first noticed that a negative charge on the air has positive effects on crew health and morale. This was observed in submerged nuclear subs where external environment effects are well controlled due to being submerged for long periods.

      It is thought that the morale destroying effects of 'the doldrums' reported historically are in part caused by the generally positive charge on the air. That's much harder to prove sine it could also be the general lack of wind (and thus progress on the voyage).

    9. Re:as proof by cptgrudge · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I can't take anyone seriously that has a site like that. Their "diagram" of the device looks like it was drawn by a 5 year old. I mean, come on. Nobody is going to take you seriously with crap like that.

      (No offense to any 5 year olds that may be reading.)

      --
      Qualitas edurus commercium, nullus penitus net rimor, nullus deus beneficium
  10. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by andih8u · · Score: 3, Informative

    How would breaking it down from hail into say small ice crystals mess up the planet?

    --


    slashdot, news for crazed liberal socialist zealots
  11. An early version of the device by marcopo · · Score: 5, Funny

    was known as a roof.

    1. Re:An early version of the device by lewp · · Score: 2, Funny

      All my crops have a roof over them ;).

      (Don't NARC on my stash)

      --
      Game... blouses.
  12. Worse than hail by CleverNickedName · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sure it will protect cars from hail, but what about all the falling pigeons?

    --


    Unfortunately, I am not Wil Wheaton
    1. Re:Worse than hail by mattjb0010 · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's where TCP steps in, to guarantee reliable transmission over IP :)

  13. Environmental Impact? by einhverfr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Any idea what the environmental impact is from these things?

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
    1. Re:Environmental Impact? by mattjb0010 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Any idea what the environmental impact is from these things?

      What's that you say? I can't hear you!

    2. Re:Environmental Impact? by martingunnarsson · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Exactly, can you change the weather just because you own the land under it? I don't think there are any laws dealing with these things, but then IANAL.

      --
      Martin
    3. Re:Environmental Impact? by PsionicMan · · Score: 4, Funny

      Yes. It will interfere with hailstone formation. Next question?

      --

    4. Re:Environmental Impact? by Mork29 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Um, most likely nothing. Many things in nature create more and louder noises... some in the sky... um... lightning? er, thunder... You know. Not to mention the noise polution humans already create. Cars, planes, American Idol. One little cannon making noise during thunderstorms which are already loud really shouldn't affect anything.

    5. Re:Environmental Impact? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I don't know if anyone reads IANAL and reads "I am not a lawyer" or if like me you just read "I anal", but seriously, it has to be the worst acronym ever. I'm just glad I finish my law degree at the end of this year and don't have to worry about it anymore....

    6. Re:Environmental Impact? by Ubi_NL · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Then how come those US submarines are capable of beaching and killing a few hundred wales everytime they try out their new sonar system?

      Seriously. This thing makes noises in a way yet unprecedented. It may very well interfere with bird flight routes or many other things. Just sucking your thumb is no way to dismiss a possible enironmental impact.

      --

      If an experiment works, something has gone wrong.
    7. Re:Environmental Impact? by Wanderer2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Water is a much better medium than air for propagating sound. That's why the whales get driven mad by certain sonar systems. The effects of these hail-preventers would be localised.

      I'd be interested to know what the effects on local birds are, although I'd imagine they don't hang around underneath a cloud that's about to lash down golf-ball sized hail...

      --
      I say we take-off and slashdot the site from orbit... it's the only way to be sure
    8. Re:Environmental Impact? by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Then how come those US submarines are capable of beaching and killing a few hundred wales everytime they try out their new sonar system?
      Because the US submarine sonar system you refer to, works
      • in water, not air.
      • at a much higher output level, over 200dB IIRC -- not 120dB which is about the noise which your local discotheque will happily torture you with.
      • works infrasonic
      In other words: How many whales have been killed so far by the sound of starting/landing airplanes? Or beach discotheques?

      Same goes for the pidgeon question, btw. They'll have a harder time finding themselves getting sucked into jet engines rather than feeling the effect of some distant 120dB sound.

  14. They forgot to mention... by teledyne · · Score: 3, Funny

    They forgot to mention that Nissan's high frequency sound doesn't disrupt the hailstone process, it just tells the hailstones not to hit Nissan cars!

  15. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by Bastian · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This wouldn't stop precipitation from happening, it's supposed to just stop the precipitation from forming hailstones. You'd get rain instead.

    I doubt it's going to become much of a problem, either. With these things generating a 120db noise every 5 seconds, you're not going to see too many of them in populated areas - as the article says, they're mostly used by farmers to protect their fields.

    That said, I'm really curious if it even works.

  16. Oh boy. by illuminata · · Score: 5, Funny

    Customer Rep. Exec: Apparently consumers are complaining about hail damage to their cars.
    CEO: Hail damage?
    Head Engineer: Great, just great. The biggest problem that people want to complain about, we have no solution for. Hell, we were never even told that this was a problem!
    CEO: Ok, ok. Look, we have to think. Does anybody have an idea as to how we handle this?
    Guile: Sonic boom!

    And so, Col. Guile's post-Street Fighter career, previously up in the air, was solidified.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
  17. And now the bad news by Alita · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apparently you don't want to live nearby (see the bottom of the story).

    This sounds like it's worse than living next to an airport.

  18. Hasn't think been around for a while? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In New Zealand, horticulturalists have used this technology for at least 5 or 10 years now. In the region I live in, hail storms often ruin the large apple crops which were once our main industry.

    Some horticulturalists have even been known to fly helicopters above their crops over night to stop frost from forming.

  19. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by shepd · · Score: 2, Troll

    >I'd personally like to thank Nissan for coming up with yet another way to fck up the natural processes on this planet.

    Natural, like a bearded pope, or pedophilia?

    Sorry to break it to you, but daily we change natural processes on this planet. Chaging hail to snow or water sounds like a great idea to me.

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  20. Sonic waves? by maxwell+demon · · Score: 3, Funny

    Actually, every car I've seen in operation did produce sonic waves (also known as sound). But until now I thought it was because of normal operation, not to prevent hail. :-)

    --
    The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.
    1. Re:Sonic waves? by futuramarama · · Score: 3, Funny

      Finally, I understand the cunning purpose of all those guys who install a subwoofer the size of their boot, in their boot

      --
      "And that solves the mystery of the missing ring" - Bender
  21. Hilarious by heironymouscoward · · Score: 5, Funny

    First reading of the article gave the impression that Nissan's new cars would be equipped with some kind of sound raygun which could be used for far more interesting things than blocking hailstones. Hey, aim that raygun at Ms Jone's house, watch the windows shatter. Cops coming? A little blast of decibels and their cars explode. Not to mention their eardrums and maybe even heads. Ugh.

    But no, we're not going to see commercialized versions of the famous Somalian 'technicals', pick-ups with anti-aircraft guns mounted in the back.

    Instead it's some kind of 'Highlander 2' plot in which giant rays are going to be beamed into the sky in order to prevent catastrophe raining down.

    So, I have three questions.

    (a) does anyone actually believe it's possible to stop hailstones forming in the heart of giant thunderclouds whose energies are hugely more than anything we can produce.

    (b) what happened to the 'roof'? A simple, yet efficient way of stopping hailstones.

    (c) who sold Nissan this thing? I'm looking for a good salesman for my company.

    --
    Ceci n'est pas une signature
    1. Re:Hilarious by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Insightful
      (b) what happened to the 'roof'? A simple, yet efficient way of stopping hailstones.

      And would need to cover 140 acres, which is the size of the parking lot...

    2. Re:Hilarious by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 4, Insightful

      How big would a multistory with 140 acres of parking room be? I just can't escape the feeling that they'd be able to protect the cars far more effectively, be able to implement better security and increase the amount of green space around the factory by ripping up 140 acres of tarmac, building a roofed multistory and landscaping the remaining ground.

  22. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by t0qer · · Score: 5, Funny

    That said, I'm really curious if it even works.

    Of course it works!! Here's a little fun with science you can make yourself that proves how this works.

    What you need:
    1 peice of paper.
    1 speaker, connected to a stereo.
    some music.

    Start by ripping the paper into little shreds and balling them up into tiny little balls. Next, take all the little balls and mash them together into one big ball.

    Now if you have decent speakers you can just set the paperball mass on top of the cabinet. For those wussy computer speakers, I recomend turning it on it's side and placing the ball directly in the cone.

    Now crank up your volume and watch what happens to those little balls. They start dancing around and the bigger ball falls apart! See! Now imagine that on a smaller scale, say ice crystal size. That is exactly what is happening to the hail when it gets sonically blasted.

  23. What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 5, Informative

    These guys have seriously been had. Anyone that knows anything about atmospheric physics can tell you that most atmospheric models neglect sound waves, and for a very good reason--because they are insignificant when compared with other phenomena present in the atmosphere, such as...surprise...wind. Anything on the scale of a severe thunderstorm strong enough to produce golf-ball sized hail or larger will have vertical air motions in excess of 40-50 m/s (100mph). Combine this with the tremendous amount of turbulence associated with such violent vertical motions, and a few piddly sound waves don't stand a chance.

    Furthermore, hailstones of the size they're concerned with usually form miles from the location they actually fall in, and are held aloft for substantial periods of time--sometimes longer than an hour. Eventually, however, the updraft in the storm will weaken or reposition itself, and when it does, look out below. So even assuming this device could prevent hail from forming within a 1-mile radius of itself, your stuff is still gonna get the crap beat out of it anyway.

    Whether the guy that sold them on this was a meteorologist or not, this sort of crockery is what gives meteorologists a bad name.

    1. Re:What a Crock by GuidoDEV · · Score: 3, Informative
      As other posters have pointed out, these systems have been used to protect high value crops since the eighties...

      That doesn't mean the system actually works, since damaging hail is very rare, even in the most hail-prone locations. Earlier incarnations of "hail cannons" have been around since the 1800s, when they shot random garbage skyward into thunderstorms...so ironically, whether or not the storm actually did anything, they were guaranteed a hail of trash (often nuts/bolts, things of that nature which were actually quite dangerous).

      ...and furthermore, Nissan are probably concerned with ALL sizes of hail...

      Unless Nissan uses Rust-O-Leum to paint their cars, in my experience you need severe hail (defined by the National Weather Service as 0.75" in diameter) at the very *least* to do anything to the paint job of an automobile. I've never seen hail less than about 1 1/2" leave any visible mark on a car, and I've seen plenty of hail. If I had just brought a brand-new Mercedes, I would have no problems with driving it through a hailstorm with a maximum hail size of 1". It sounds really bad when it's hitting your car, but doesn't do anything.

    2. Re:What a Crock by Idarubicin · · Score: 2, Insightful
      These guys have seriously been had. Anyone that knows anything about atmospheric physics can tell you that most atmospheric models neglect sound waves, and for a very good reason--because they are insignificant when compared with other phenomena present in the atmosphere, such as...surprise...wind.

      Well...it may be counterintuitive, but it probably isn't safe to write it off without a test. Perhaps the shock waves generated are tuned somehow to be particularly effective at disrupting hail.

      My area of expertise is optical phenomena, not sound, so I'll take an example from my field. A thirty watt incandescent lamp is pretty weak--you can read by it, but it's pretty dim. Staring at a thirty watt argon laser will rapidly blind you, while the beam from a thirty watt carbon dioxide laser will easily ignite wood.

      I agree with the parent poster that any sound energy generated by this device will be absolutely infinitesimal compared to the total energy available in even a moderate thunderstorm. Nevertheless, I think we would need to know about the possible coherence of the sound and its frequency spectrum before we can say if it might or might not be effective. Also of note, the goal is not the complete disruption of the thunderstorm. All Nissan seeks to do is reduce the size of the hailstones produced to the point where they won't damage their cars. It may be that it is (relatively) easy to disrupt the process of large hailstone formation. Rain, snow, sleet, or millimeter-size hailstones won't hurt their inventory.

      The question of hailstones carried significant distances to the site is an interesting one. Perhaps the device causes the storm to drop the stones beyond the perimeter of the parking lot...or perhaps Nissan is following a strategy of reducing their risk. They acknowledge there will still be hail damage; they're just hoping for less.

      Presumably, Nissan management is not populated entirely by idiots who get off on public humiliation--wouldn't you expect there to have been some testing of this device before installation?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  24. I can understand the use for crops by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Hail damage can ruin an entire crop and it is not like most farmers are on such high margins they can afford the loss of a year. However to protect a parking lot? Never heard of a roof?

    Don't get me wrong. We got one of those car parks in the dock area here and it is huge but it wouldn't need to be a complex roof and its success would be 100%. Also stops sunlight and seagull shit and acid rain.

    So nice story, didn't know this was even possible but Nissan probably got had. Will be intresting to hear what their neighbours will have to say about it. Noise polution in a 5 mile area? Never be allowed over here. Here people complain they can hear the trains in the house they bought that is next the rail track.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:I can understand the use for crops by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Farmers carry insurance for that protection. Seems like a better idea to me, we grow far more crops than we need, so let insurance cover the small amount that are destroyed, and leave the weather alone.

      Remember when car were going to save the cities from pollution? Of course not, because that was about 100 years ago, but back about 1900 cars were welcomed in many cities because they didn't leave droppings all over the streets. Of course today we know about the droppings they leave all over the air... I don't know which is worse. (Yes I know that not everyone welcomed cars, but many did)

  25. GAAAA by RMH101 · · Score: 4, Funny

    RTFM: this is designed to protect the car park of thousands of new cars, to stop them getting dented predelivery. They're not mounting sonic cannon on the roof of each vehicle, although if it was an option I *would* buy it!

  26. I still don't get it. by 10537 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I have a device fitted to my house to prevent damage from hailstones. I call it a roof. It's silent, consumes no power, and also protects against rain, snow, intense sun, falling birds, and a whole host of other things...

    --
    This sentence no verb.
  27. Will the Sonic Booms... by i-Chaos · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... drive nearby sandworms to a frenzy and provoke them to attack the vehicle, swallowing it whole?

    --
    ...I am proof that intelligent beings are not always intelligent...
  28. Nissan today announces... by ForestGrump · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their new hail protection system has saved them millions of dollars in damage to cars.

    However, they system's "sonic boom" has broken millions of dollars in windows.

    -Grump

    --
    Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  29. Re:Won't that be dangerous... by Polkyb · · Score: 3, Funny

    Nissan don't have them fitted to cars yet

    Your thinking of a Volkswagon Golf

    :-)

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  30. I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by bgspence · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in the 1970's I was able to buy a hail damaged new Falcon for $750. Ford was dumping them because the cost to repair the damage would be more than the car was worth. I thought it was a super deal.

    It had dozens of quarter sized dimples, and ran really fast. I'm not sure, but it might have benefited from some kind of golf ball wind resistance effect.

    1. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by shepd · · Score: 2, Funny

      >It had dozens of quarter sized dimples, and ran really fast. I'm not sure, but it might have benefited from some kind of golf ball wind resistance effect.

      Homer: [suspicious] Hey, what are all these holes?
      Salesman: [quickly] These are speed holes. They make the car go faster.
      Homer: Oh, yeah. Speed holes!

      [bullets riddle the car and smash the windshield]

      Salesman: You want my advice? I think you should buy this car.

      Gotta love snpp!

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:I had a hail damaged Ford Falcon by dtmos · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You may have been prescient: The new Lexus LS-430 has golf ball dimples on the underside.

  31. Batlow Australia by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    When I visited Batlow (the apple capital of NSW) over 14 years ago, they had sonic cannons for hail protection at the time. So yeah, slashdot, "news from the 1980s revisited". I hear that these new fangled phones that don't use wires are coming onto the market too (yup, I saw a homeless beggar using one at the weekend), so maybe slashdot will be reporting on that too? :-)

  32. German Sound Weapons in WWII by fuzzybunny · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This reminds me of the German antipersonnel sonic cannon developed during WWII.

    Apparently, this one required a targetted infantryman to remain in place for more than half a minute, but the idea is probably similar.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  33. Pegging the needle on the BS-ometer by dtmos · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I agree completely. Reading about this system made me marvel at the salesmanship involved. You'd think anyone past high school would recognize such obvious pseudoscience, but I guess the saying about fools being born every minute is a great truism. People don't realize how rare hail damage is, statistically, and so they can be led to believe that systems like this work, when it's just very likely that hail hasn't fallen on that 100-acre plot of land in the last three years because, well, hail wasn't going to fall there in the first place.

    Unless Nissan got a better deal, even the company's guarantee is worthless, viz.:

    [...]

    Anti-Hail clause

    In order to respect its obligation of fully satisfied or money back warranty, Hail Stop Equipment inc. warrants to the users of its product a protection against hail on a 500 meters (1650 pi.) radius. If the customer had damages caused by hail inside the protected zone, then Hail Stop Equipment inc. will compensate the customer's losses. The refund value is limited to the lesser of both amounts; either to the value of the losses or the amount that the customer paid to buy its Ollivier Hail Suppression system(R). The customer requests are subjected to a $5,000US exemption. A preheating delay of 20 minutes must occure to give the time to the Ollivier system to reaches optimal efficiency.

    In order to keep your guarantee your 3 years warranty effective, Hail Stop Equipment inc. require a complete annual audit of the system to deliver a yearly certificate of conformity attesting that the system has been inspected (and adjusted if need be) and Hail Stop Equipment inc. takes back its warranty for another year until the end of the third year from the date of installation. The certificate also confirms the eligibility to the service contract renewal. The yearly certification assures the customer that its system is always functional, safe and efficient. If you are covered by an optional service contract, then the manpower required for the works of yearly certification is free. [emphasis added]

    So, even if hundreds of acres of cars are hail-damaged while the system is in use (after the 20-minute warmup period), the company is only liable for the cost of the "hail suppression system", minus $5000! However, you have to pay, either directly or via a service contract, for an annual inspection to keep the 3-year warrranty in force--price undisclosed.

    The only way this makes any economic sense for Nissan is if they got the system for free, so that the shyster company can use them as a showcase customer, for the publicity value. Even then, you'd think the public embarassment at being associated with such a scam would be intolerable.

    The whole thing reminds me of the story about the guy jumping up and down in the middle of the street, blowing a whistle. Someone walks up and says,

    "Why are you blowing the whistle?"

    "To scare the elephants away."

    "Elephants? There are no elephants around here!"

    "See? It's working!"

  34. Re:WTF? by dario_moreno · · Score: 4, Informative

    it only pays off for small volume cars. The first generations of Renault Espace for instance were made of fiberglass, as the Alpines or Matras, but Espaces sells so well that now it is less expensive to manufacture them out of steel. Steel necessitates big investments in terms of presses, that's why europeans cars only change every 5 or 6 years, then the factories are sold to 2nd or 3rd world countries, but has better performance overall notwithstanding what you mention. Chassis tend to be made of aluminium to save weight in new BMWs, the bodywork is still made of steel.

    --
    Google passes Turing test : see my journal
  35. Uh, roof? by twilight30 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wouldn't a fucking roof be cheaper -- and more intelligent? They need to screw up local weather patterns as well? Have they done environmental studies for collateral effects?

    Jesus.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Uh, roof? by BigGerman · · Score: 3, Funny

      yeah but would the article about a new roof over some dealership / autoplant appear on Slashdot?
      Think different, people!

  36. If only... by darkitecture · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now if only they could make a cannon that could get rid of those pesky bike couriers who lean on your car.

  37. Re:Damage by ComaVN · · Score: 2, Informative

    Jets are closer to 200dB.

    not quite: Jet engine at 3m : 140dB
    Seems you're off by a factor 1 million.

    Still, it seems pretty unlikely to affect, let alone damage, an aircraft.

    Also, I doubt lightning is THAT loud. Where did you get that number?

    --
    Be wary of any facts that confirm your opinion.
  38. Re:A small hail-free patch (photo) by mrgeometry · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Yeah, that web site looks pretty sketchy to me, not that I'm an expert. The photo you mentioned has a white area in the foreground---could be snow, could be hail---and a HUGE non-white area in the background. That is NOT a picture of a "small hail-free patch", surrounded by an area with hail. There is no hail or snow visible on the far side of the hail-free area. It does not seem possible from the picture on their website to verify that the white stuff is actually hail; it could be snow. The whole thing could be Photoshop.

    Other pages on the site have:

    * inconsistent information (every 5.5 seconds; every 6 seconds; every 5 seconds; the noise level is listed at various levels, too...)
    * dubious statements like "supersonic explosions do not affect animals"
    * incorrect spelling and punctuation
    * overuse of jargon and jargon-y words (such as "ascending thermionic explosions"). Looking at this web site, I got the feeling that they did not want me to understand how it works, they just want me to be impressed.
    * Worst of all: statistics! Why do they start the noise level measurements 50m away? Are you not supposed to go closer than 50m while it's operating? What if you install this on the roof of your car?

    Of course, they don't have to explain their patented super-invention to me. But if they are going to deliberately withhold information, they could have been less patronizing about it! Overall, the site seems to have a very low level of professionalism. To whatever degree this reflects on the device itself, it reflects poorly.

    zach

  39. Daimler's hail protection for Mercedes by sbryant · · Score: 4, Informative

    Daimler also have hail protection for their large car park of brand new Mercedes cars at Sindelfingen (by Stuttgart), but they don't use sonic booms. They have two Cessna pilots on standby, who will fly up and ionise the clouds or something like that, which stops the hail from forming. It seems to work well, too.

    -- Steve

  40. bats by momokatte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The fighter would probably appear to be a deep cave opening to a bat, rather than give the impression that the hangar is completely empty. They probably all flew into it at top speed expecting to find a great place to live.

  41. How hail forms and why this won't work by Orp · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Hailstones are formed and begin with a piece of dust in the clouds," he explains. "There is a lot of activity going on, and what we do is to de-ionize that activity in the clouds and keep those dust particles from collecting moisture out of the clouds in turn reacting and forming what we know as a hailstone."

    I'm a professor of meteorology. If one of my students had written that drivel I would have flunked 'em!

    The microphysics of clouds is very complex. I'd really like to know what mechanism they really are trying to stifle here. Here is a bit on how hail forms. First, some background:

    In a rapidly growing cumulonimbus (thunderstorm) cloud, you have a strong updraft (air rising rapidly). This air is contains humid air, which condenses to form liquid cloud droplets as it cools (rising air expands and cools - basic thermodynamics). It is indeed true that cloud droplets condense upon pieces of dust/salt/gunk in the atmosphere, but ionization has very very little to do with it. Many of these so-called condensation nuclei are not ionized. Water will condense upon just about anything if cooled enough.

    Eventually this rising, cloudy air reaches heights where temperatures are well below freezing - say -20 degrees C. Water actually does not have to freeze when it is below 0 degrees C, and in fact what leads to lots of hail is the fact that there is an abundance of supercooled (below freezing liquid) cloud droplets in this cloud.

    Eventually some ice crystals form, either spontaneously (supercooled cloud droplets freeze at about -40 degrees C - this is called homogeneous nucleation of ice), or because they come in contact with an ice nucleus (something that has a similar crystal structure to water ice). These ice crystals fall and co-mingle with the supercooled cloud droplets. Due to the difference in saturation vapor pressures over ice and water at a given temperature, these ice crystals grow and grow at the expense of the cloud droplets without actually making physical contact!

    Now the stage is set for hail. There is an abundance of supercooled cloud droplets, which freeze upon contact with ice crystals. Contact is made, and graupel is formed. Graupel is kind of an intermediate form of ice between snow and hail. The updraft of the storm keeps everything going, and in fact can suspend heavy hail particles for a while before they either become so heavy they fall through the updraft, or they are tossed horizontally to a part of the storm where they fall to the ground. The largest hailstones form with the strongest updrafts because the hail can acrete lots and lots of supercooled water (hail will melt and refreeze also as it rises and falls within the cloud).

    Again, I simply cannot fathom what process they are trying to stifle with these sound waves. Hail suppression research has focused mainly on seeding clouds with silver iodide. Silver iodide is a powdery substance which has an ice crystal shape very similar to that of water ice. Overseeding a cloud with AgI, so the theory goes, will convert all that supercooled cloud water into small ice crystals, scavenging all the liquid so there won't be any "lucky" graupel particles growing to the size of hail stones.

    The Russians claimed some success with this process during the cold war (launching AgI laced rockets into clouds) but frankly I think they were overstating their success. Hail suppression work reached its peak in the 70's but because of the lack of any real statistical success, funding for this kind of work has pretty much dried up.

    Anyway, a sucker is born every minute.

    Leigh Orf

    --
    A squid eating dough in a polyethylene bag is fast and bulbous, got me?
    1. Re:How hail forms and why this won't work by hailstop · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm glad you posted that, so I wouldn't have to. I've been a meteorologist working on the Alberta Hail Suppression Project for four of the past 6 years and really get annoyed by this stuff....

  42. Not really all that new by mbasyro13 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is not really that new. There is an apple orchard near my grandparents farm that has a sound cannon to prevent hail damage to the apples. I've seen it operate a couple of times. You can actually watch the sound waves ripple through the rain/hail in the sky. We use to always speculate whether or not it really works...apparently he thinks it does

    The only real difference here is the application and the radar (the farmer would manually turn it on)

  43. Re:Altering Weather... Great! by PhuCknuT · · Score: 3, Insightful

    They are altering weather over a tiny area probably only 1/4 square mile, and only during hailstorms. And they aren't stopping the precipitation, they are only stopping the hailstone formation. I'd like to hear a single reason, other than noise polution, that this is bad.

    If anything, this is good for the environment, as it reduces the number of cars destroyed every year by hail, therefore reducing needless manufacturing of replacement parts and reducing the amount ending up as scrap metal.

    Besides, just because something 'happens for a reason' doesn't mean it's good for the environment. Meteors hit earth for a reason (their orbits cross earth's at a bad time), that doesn't mean they are a good thing. Hail isn't a good thing, it's not like nature 'evolved' hail to fill some need, it's just something that happens when you mix cold and thunderstorms.

  44. Um, people.. this is not a SMALL parking lot by AnswerIs42 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    These "parking lots" are not small. They can be over 10 ACERS in size. The average plant has a parking area 4 to 5 acers in size. You have any clue as to how much it would cost to build a roof like that?

    The technology is solid and has been proven. The cost ratio is better to go with a sound generator.

    Now, all we need is something to disrupt tornadoes...

  45. Sonic-Cannon? by Spokehedz · · Score: 2, Funny

    Is it me, or does this thing sound like something the guys on Junkyard Wars or MythBusters would build?

    *Junkyard Wars Mode*

    Today's challenge is going to be all about Changin' the weather! We've assembled two teams of the finest... well, they do make cars and such... People on the planet to build:

    A Hail Prevention/Detection device!

    Our two teams have just 10 hours to build a device that can do something that mankind has been trying to do for centuries--do something about the weather, instead of just talking about it!

    *MythBusters Mode*

    Announcer: Tonight on Mythbusters... See if the old saying "I hope your face sticks like that" is entirely possible--using LN2! And later on, Adam and Jamie build something to deal with that pesky weather.

    *** Later On ***

    Adam: Jimmy--

    Jimmy: Yes Adam?

    Adam: Have you ever talked about the weather?

    Jimmy: Yea, on a couple of my more 'memorable' dates...

    Adam: well, wouldn't it be something if we could do something about the weather, instead of just talk about it?

    Jimmy: It might be... who knows--I might have been to get into that guy--I mean, girl's pants if I could have stopped the sun from shining, so he couldn't have seen me...

    Adam: I'm not talking about no namby-pamby rain here... I'm talking about HAILSTONES here, baby!

    Jimmy: Oh god... not another Sonic-Cannon, Adam. We've built 35 of them already--and we've only been on the air for 20 episodes...

  46. But what happens after you drive off the lot? by Bob+Bitchen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is not a very good solution. It only protects cars in the devices' vicinity. But once you buy the car what's to protect it then? A real solution would be one that protected the car at all times. More resilient glass and body panels. And paint that can withstand hail strikes. I guess that car makers don't really care what happens once you've bought the car.

    --
    http://tinyurl.com/3t236
  47. Dangerous Precident by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Even if this could work ( which I seriously doubt ), is there any thought given to the ramifications of messing with natural processes?

    while *we* may have no use for them, they are part of nature, and do play a part in what goes on.

    Once we start screwing with the 'way of things', we are just asking for troubles we cant even foresee as of yet.

    And not I'm not a 'tree hugger', I just worry about the caviler attitude, ' well if we don't like it, today, we will just change nature to suit us'....

    Just look at the great dustbowl in the Midwest US if you don't think our seemingly unimportant actions can have drastic effects decades later...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Dangerous Precident by ReadbackMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Did you even read the article? This is the ninth one installed in the United States. There are 400 world wide, ... its primary use is to protect crops...

      And you think it doesn't work? How'd they sell 400 of the things? When's the last time you saw an apple with hail damage? Did you think it had just stopped hailing?

      As for changing nature, sweet jeebus, we're humans we change nature to suit us all the time, or did you think crops just naturally formed in large patches of ground? You're surfing the net, if you have a CRT monitor you have electrons shooting out into your face right now. Did you think that someone just found it on the beach?

      The basic principle is that nature is not as fragile as it's portrayed. I don't think shooting a couple of shock waves into the air is going to cause any irreparable damage, and if we didn't screw with nature occasionally we would still be sitting in caves, eating berries and grubs.

  48. In other news... by KC7GR · · Score: 2, Funny

    I suppose this will drive neighborhood pooches nuts every time it fires up. This could be a Good Thing if you're not keen on dogs leaving liquid donations on your tires or fender during hailstorms.

    I know! Let's dub the thing the 'W.C. Field(s) Generator!'

    I think I'll go take my meds now... ;-)

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  49. A Good Reason for This by McLuhanesque · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Last year, Nissan incurred hail damage to tens of thousands of new vehicles waiting for transport outside of their plant in (I think) Tennessee. The entire inventory was auctioned off to dealers are rock bottom prices (even for wholesale). I would expect that the dealers fixed up the hail damage and subsequently sold the cars. However, it meant a loss of millions of dollars of revenue to Nissan USA.

    This device is a small and worthwhile investment, even if there is only one hailstorm in the next decade.

  50. Re:Environmental Impact? (Slightly OT) by Man+Eating+Duck · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I used to be a sonar operator.

    This effect is known as cavitation - it occurs because of a drop in pressure causing sea water to boil at sea temperature in the low pressure parts of the sound wave. It also occurs in front of ship's propellers, and is one way for submarines to detect surface vessels ("popping" sounds). Our frigate's propellers started cavitating at about 12 knots' speed.

    Submarines have propellers especially designed to avoid this, as their operation is based on stealth.

    The sound pressure from an active sonar dome can exceed 200 db due to the high density of water, and can kill divers in the vicinity of the vessel. A fellow operator inadvertently turned on the sonar while in harbour, killed some fish (luckily no divers were in the water at the time), and was relocated instantly.

    --
    Are you a grammar Nazi? I'm trying to improve my English; please correct my errors! :)
  51. One step closer to the Thompson Harmonizer! by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Seriously though, stuff like this really bothers me. While having a few of these on a continent probably won't do anything too disastrous, what will the unintended consequences be if they start becoming popular?

    Eric

    [The subject line is a reference to the novel Atlas Shrugged by Ayn Rand, in which the U.S. government publicly announces the existence of the said machine, and all the wonderful benefits it will have, when in fact it is a weapon which can only cause destruction within the U.S.]

  52. Gotta be kidding... by KlomDark · · Score: 3, Informative

    A huge (glass) greenhouse for growing hydroponic tomatos near me (central Nebraska) has one of those annoying things. Whenever conditions are favorable for hail, the thing goes off, sounds like someone shooting a large shotgun every five seconds, which goes on for hour after hour. I can't think of anything more annoying. Everybody in town hates the thing, and in fact some redneck types (We are in Nebraska after all) think it's great fun to shoot their (real) shotguns in the air when this is going on, as the greenhouse blasts provide great cover.

    Perhaps metal shielding on a conveyor system to be pulled over would be much better to deal with. Maybe more expensive, but this is fucking ridiculous.

  53. no, no, you got it all wrong by ajagci · · Score: 2, Funny

    This is "cat-ions", i.e., ionized cats, not "cations". If you shoot millions of ionized cats into the stratosphere, it does prevent hail storms from forming (but you do have to contend with falling cats).

  54. Abandoning scientific theories, on the other hand- by Rimbo · · Score: 2, Insightful
    "Anyway, a sucker is born every minute."

    Disproving good hard science takes a bit longer. Not just because of the effort involved, but because of the inertia of supposedly rational scientific thinkers -- just ask Barry Marshall:

    The peer response showed the same scepticism that greeted Warren's initial observations, and for a number of years the majority of the medical profession dismissed the hypothesis. Despite this, the Perth team continued to gather evidence of their theory, dramatically in one case. Deciding that the best way to prove the findings was to show exactly what happened when infected with H. pylori, Marshall swallowed a culture of the bacterium. A week later, he began suffering acute symptoms of gastritis, and biopsies revealed that he had developed both infection with H. pylori and severe acute gastritis. Fortunately, the sequel was a successful case of "Physician, heal thyself"!


    If this has been in use since the 1980s, and if it has prevented the formation of hail as it claims, then the evidence should be available for people to see. And if that evidence shows that it does, in fact, prevent hail formation, then there's obviously something working.

    Given the number of years this has been in service in New Zealand and the like, it should be possible to find evidence of it working or not working -- through the absence or presence of hail in the general region where the device is used, along with the absence or presence of hail in the local area immediately near where the device is (with some accounting for the effect of wind blowing hail one way or the other).

    Not all things that work in ways that science doesn't understand are pseudoscience, and not all commonly-accepted scientific principles are not. The "hard" part of hard science is where we constantly re-evaluate our own view of how things work.

    In short, give this a chance. I can understand people being fooled in the short run, but since people have used things like this since the 80's, they must keep using 'em for some reason. Maybe they don't work and the folks just want to get their money's worth! But until you go to the source of the data and examine it critically, how can you know, regardless of how good your understanding of current science is?