Slashdot Mirror
Australia To Adopt U.S.-Style Copyright Laws
An anonymous reader submits "Australia has just announced that it has finalized a Free Trade Agreement with the United States. Included in the treaty is an agreement for Australia to implement American-style DMCA copyright laws, extensions to the term of copyright, and an agreement to move towards American-style patent and trademark laws (and we all know how well those work, don't we.) I suppose this is the misery-loves-company school of treaty negotiation."
This brings up an interesting notion. At what point does financial globalization lead to the homogenization of national laws, even horrible ones? In the past, idiocy could be somewhat contained due to the fact that different countries have vastly different review procedures and generally different sensibilities about abstract concepts such as intellectual property. This article serves as a frightening example of how financial interests may lead to the exportation of horrible ideas.
One is also led to wonder what good ideas will be lost as testing of creative ways to deal wth modern problems could be in violation of treaties such as this one.
How many roads must a man walk down? 42.
I live in the USA. Sometimes it's government does things right and sometimes it does things wrong. When a bad decision is made by the US government, I look to the rest of the world to show them the light... but what happens? They say "great job! we'll do the same stupid thing". Why can't some countries do something different than the US and prove that there is a better system out there.
If the world becomes homogeneous we will lose out on the benefits of diversity. Europe became strong because it was so diverse. Once it and the rest of the world is thoroughly homogenized, the world will be a worlthless clump. It will never grow. Competition and diversity breeds success.
Now they're making other countries follow their laws for free trade agreements? What the fuck? Ignorance must be commonplace.
in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
Man, the list of countries the people of the US have to apologize to because we can't keep our stupid Government in it's own backyard keeps growning and growning...
Great. In addition to our beef and sugar farmers getting screwed (again), now we open ourselves up to ridiculous copyright laws shown to be fundamentally broken already in the US. Is this what we have to show for the blood on our hands from tagging along in the Iraqi invasion last year? There's only one good thing about this, and that is it will help hasten the demise of John W. Howard as the Prime Minister of our country. And for that I can hardly thank him enough.
America has no goods or resources that you couldn't obtain more cheaper from the APAC region.
While America would be a wonderful captive market full of consumers, the trouble is that they are all paying in US Dollars, and due to the fiscal irresponsibility of the US Government, that is nothing but American Debt. You give away your valuable goods and services to America and they pay you back in debt. Their debt, which is now your problem and not theirs, as there isn't an army big enough to force America to make good on their debts.
I agree that the senate has the chance to stop this sillyness before it gets too far, but only if the senators themselves understand the issues properly.
The media will "egemecate" the people and make everyone support a DMCA style system, because it would be unAustralian not to.
Thankfully we don't have Senator "Plasma Dick" Alston to luddite his way through it all.
" Does anyone with knowledge of Austrailian law know if the Austrailian treaty will violate some of their freedoms in the way the American DMCA has violated some of the United States citizen's freedoms contained within the constitution?"
As of late, governments are discovering that getting on with their business of the day becomes far easier if things like their Constitution, the rule of law, human rights, additional rights of the people, basic decency, and respect for human dignity are entirely ignored. Thus, men are no longer ruled by ideals or laws, but by the whims of those who happen to be in power at any given time. Luckily, we've become sufficiently advanced, militarily, that the revolutions of old which had always corrected such problems are no longer possible.
Let's hear it for progress, ladies and gentlemen.
-- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
Funny how freetrade enables white colar jobs to move oversea;s but farming is untouchable.
Pisses me off too.
Its selective freetrade towards campaign contributors and its corruption to its core. Same is true with your government. Famers probably gave less to a conservative PM candidate and those who are in manufactoring and IP gave towards Murdochs campaign. They will hapilly now outsource your jobs away. But American farmers vote like you would not beleive and want high prices for American farming products via tarrifs so they can make more money.
http://saveie6.com/
now if all those people would orginize, grab a few signs and RAISE SOME HELL, that just might get somewhere.
Of course, it is so much easier to cry into your Fosters.
The Kruger Dunning explains most post on
As an Australian I'm not really surprised at our prime-minister's submissive attitude towards America. Mark Latham, now leader of the opposition and potentially our next prime-minister, once famously commented that prime-minister Howard was an 'ass-licker' while referring to talks between the president and the prime-minister.
It may have been a little imprudent to say so in front of the media, but he was simply saying what alot of people were thinking at the time. Maybe if American politicians had the courage to be so forthright there wouldn't be DMCA or Patriot or IP lawyers mocking your most basic constitutional rights so flagrantly.
Speaking of which, the 'licker' comment was made during the lead up to the war in Iraq. The assertion was that if we supported the US in their little WMD wild goose chase, then we'd be favoured in the upcoming free-trade talks (not to mention post-war contracts). I guess they stiffed us on the free-trade!
I ran a benchmark on my quantum computer, now I can't find it anywhere!
Absolutely! Which is why you certainly won't see us looking at other brutal regimes too closely in case someone actually expects us to do something about them! Crap, if we'd actually wanted to make a stand against crimes against humanity we would have had to go into shitholes like Rwanda and Cambodia and who knows where else! I mean...what?...oh riiight...sarcasm, huh? Sorry I spoke out of turn.
the onanism of having your own name placed in such works
You mean like taking "The Tragicall Historye of Romeus and Juliet", by Arthur Brooke, and rewriting it as a play? It's called adaption, and it's a staple of how literature develops.
changing the ending into a happy one is something that I certainly consider disrespectful
How can it be disrespectful? Despite how they're performed now, Shakespeare's plays were originally done before a crowd of uncultured, common folk, who often talked and called out during the show, and consisted in large part of crude jokes and sexual innuendo. Shakespeare wrote for his audience. They wanted tragedy. He wrote tragedy. If Shakespeare was alive now, he'd be just as likely to write feel-good comedy or an action movie as the next scriptwriter.
Taking a classic and insisting nobody ever changes it is a brilliant way of making sure that classic dies a horrible death. Just think of the splash Baz Luhrmann's Romeo and Juliet made in the popular media. And regardless of what the intellectual feel about popular media, all great classics arise from it; either inspired by it, or constructed in opposition to it. Thinking a work should be immune to change just because it's old is stupid; it should be the opposite. Something so old, yet still so loved, should be tinkered with, fiddled with, changed, and added to, to try and get the most out of a great piece of art.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
The big wory for NZers must be the effect this FTA could have on the CER treaty between NZ and Australia.
It would not surprise me if NZ now came under extreme pressure to fall into line with Australian laws (aka: US laws) in key areas.
Let's face it, the NZ government had no hesitation in handing over the responsibility for creating and maintaining the laws that control non-prescription medications in NZ (including vitamins and supplements) to Australia just a few short months ago.
This does not bode well for things such as NZ copyright, patent and other IP laws.
You're right: what's the point of ridding a country from a vicious dictator who brutalizes his own population, destroys the environment, instigates war and supports terrorism unless you actually get some financial benefit from it?!?
No, you are right, we should do it because it is the right thing to do. So, when does the war against Bush begin?
Joking aside, most of the people who criticize Bush and the war are making just your point, though you seem to have missed it: We belive they started the war for their own financial benifit, not because of the goodness of their hearts. After all, they don't mind vicious dictators anywhere else.
Being bitter is drinking poison and hoping someone else will die
I know, it's a controversial idea. :)
/. readers, get *off* /. and get cracking on those submissions! Or, perhaps, get involved with some organization that's likely to put together such a submission and contribute. Or at least let them know it's an important issue. The Australian Computer Society might be a good place to start, for example. While you won't get rid of this completely, you may help mitigate it so that it's not ridiculously sweeping or draconian.
From the article:
Tighter controls on circumventing technological protection of copyright material together with a mechanism for examining and as necessary introducing public interest exceptions in relation to technological protection measures, along with a transition period to provide the opportunity for public submissions in this area, as well as other measures in relation to circumvention tools
From this paragraph, it appears that the government would actually like to hear what the problems are with legislation that outlaws software that might potentially be used to infringe others "intellectual property". At least they are aware that this may cause problems, and I see this as a good thing.
So, Australian
All that is required for evil to flourish is that good men only rant on Slashdot (or something).
Absolutely fucking hilarious. The Australian posters on this board are all outraged that they're going to be forced to adopt U.S. style copyright laws, and that our government is nothing but a spineless U.S. puppet...and your insinuation is that by adopting more U.S. attitudes and laws, that will somehow make it all better? Maybe we needed to negotiate a free trade agreement on whatever it is that you're smoking right now.
"What?!? You don't like the taste of shit? I know how to fix that! Here's some more shit for you to eat!!"
Just because you can point to one point in time and say "things were worse then" doesn't mean there's a reason we should accept the crap we're given today. Not to mention that in the times of Nixon and Reagan, the US wasn't as influential as it is now. What those guys did primarily screwed the US. Now, I don't have anything against American citizens, but if you're governments screwing you over, that's your business. I get concerned when decisions in America start having knock-on effects throughout the rest of the world.
Just because you're paranoid doesn't mean there isn't an invisible demon about to eat your face
Well you say you're all for sampling - how much is considered too much?
:)
Do you go by the amount of lines, words, or syllables?
Personally I think what he's doing is interesting. Is it art? Is 'Billy the Singing Bass Fish' art? Dunno. To each his/her own I suppose.
Some people say art is that which provokes an emotional response. Based on your reaction I'd say it clears that definition!
"...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
Columbia?
You never hear them complaining about access to markets and free trade barriers.
No, but you do hear them complaining about US forces destroying their livelihoods.
Drugs may damage society, but so does spraying someone's only source of income with toxic chemicals. I don't think many of those farmers are happy...
I *know* the Government is out to screw me, but I have to convince 50+% of all other Aussies to VOTE THESE BASTARDS OUT!
Hopefully this will never get through the Senate...
47 Meelion Dollars!?! I'm the cat!
Yep. Why, with all the guns in the hands of civilians here in the U.S., the government would never dare pass a law like the DMCA.
Oh, wait...they did.
Use 'slashdot stuff' in the subject line in any email you send me if you want to get past the spam filter.
I think the main point is that there's a lot of other countries between us and Iraq. If these people really are genuine refugee's then why don't they "seek asylum" in the myriad of other countries? Why come all the way here? The fact that they come all the way to Australia rather than a closer country demonstrates that they are economic migrants, not genuine refugees. As such, they should be locked up or immediately deported to their country of origin because they're breaking the law by trying to sneak into our country under false pretenses.
I seem to remember him admitting that the reason Australia was going to war was to help America.
Then he should renounce his Australian citizenship, go to the US and apply to become a US citizen. Who in their right mind wants a "leader" who's first loyalty is to a foreign country? This used to be considered to be "high treason", which might even still be a capitol crime in Australia.
The Free Trade agreement was an issue that was repeatedly brought up by politicians and the media as well as the need for American military protection.
What military threat is Australia facing which is beyond the ability of the Australian military to cope with?
Hand written letters are NOT preferred in our case. We're a new Aussie political party using 21st century technology to operate (shock horror!!), unlike the majors:
www.neteffect.org.au
Voice your disgust to us in person. We are a newly formed political party, and need your help to get 500 active members so we can run for election in the Senate this year. We're also based online, to make it really easy to contact us. Snail mail campaigns don't do much I'm afraid - better to have someone in parliament who will give you a voice in the first place.
In this case, that someone will hopefully be me, and anyone else willing to run for election this year under our banner. We are a new type of political party that WILL oppose these stupid laws, and have the knowledge base to understand their true implications.
You have a chance right now to DO something about it and MAKE this an issue at the upcoming election. So visit our website, jump into our forum and support us by becoming a member.
Visceral Psyche Films
Name me one country between Iraq and Australia that is a signatory to the UN Refugee Convention and is politically stable. Oh and don't worry about being fooled into thinking they're lawbreakers, Howard and Ruddock have decieved many people. If they were infact breaking the law then we'd lock them up in jail. At least there are better conditions in jail. They are asylum seekers, not illegal immigrants, just like the people at Guatanamo Bay are P.O.Ws not enemy combatants.
Oh and don't forget to sing the revised version of our anthem. Instead of "For those who've come across the seas we've boundless plains to share" it now goes "For those who've come across the seas we could not really care".
"She's a West Texas girl, just like me" - G.W Bush Iraqis
That may be, however, do you see the same Govt. that approved this agreement really doing anything that might be at all in Australia's benefits ? Especially if the US Govt. leans over and says "we'd prefer it if you did it /this/ way"
I'm sorrry, but naively believing the Howard Govt. would cross the US is laughable at best.
David de Groot Snr Systems Engineer