Slashdot Mirror


Motorola A768 Phone Loaded With Open Source

Supp0rtLinux writes "According to this article over at Linux Devices and noted on here at NewsForge.com, Motorola has released a newer version of its A76x line of cellular phones. This newest release, the A768, boasts of open source softwares from Monta Vista Linux, Trolltech, and Sleepycat. The only downside is that it appears to only be available in China right now. And the older A760 released last August is still only available in Europe and Asia. Why are we in the U.S. always the last to get new cellular toys? The good news, though, is that with a Linux base and an integrated PDA and MS Office file compatibility, at least syncing this to either a Linux system or a Windows one should be fairly seamless. (A760 Review)"

44 of 200 comments (clear)

  1. US cell phones by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why are we in the U.S. always the last to get new cellular toys?

    Because you have several competing, incompatible cellular networks, when the rest of the world seems to have enough sense to agree on GSM. GSM is an easier, and denser market to conquer. The US market comes second, when something GSM is proven to work well commercially.

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:US cell phones by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And because our POTS system doesn't charge per minute and doesn't suck as much as it does in most other countries.

    2. Re:US cell phones by el-spectre · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Heh... no, the point is that we (in the US) have GSM, as well as several other competing techs. It doesn't make as much economic sense to start here.

      Europe is ahead of the US in certain fields, cellular tech being one of them. It's just a fact, not an insult.

      --
      "Faith: Belief without evidence in what is told by one who speaks without knowledge, of things without parallel." - A.B.
    3. Re:US cell phones by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, many European countries have a FAR more modern POTS system than the US. Technically, that is. So, don't get me started on how persons are charged in the US for RECEIVING phone calls.

    4. Re:US cell phones by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Oh, please, what difference does it make what protocol is used? Once you have the silicon designed it is just a "library" you plug into. Sure if you are a small cell phone designer you might not bother to create silicon for some of the other US standards, but that is no excuse for not at least designing a US GSM version. (Not when you already have 900Mhz (or was it 800?)and 1800Mhz phone to design.

      Or haven't hardware engineers learned the value of well designed interfaces like us software people have. GSM will not be the only standard for long, 3g systems are coming out, and they are closer to the US systems than GSM. Nobody in their right mind knowing that would design a cell phone that they couldn't move to a different protocol.

    5. Re:US cell phones by dslbrian · · Score: 2, Informative

      Once you have the silicon designed it is just a "library" you plug into...

      ...GSM will not be the only standard for long, 3g systems are coming out, and they are closer to the US systems than GSM. Nobody in their right mind knowing that would design a cell phone that they couldn't move to a different protocol.

      Actually as someone who designed the Motorola front-end chip I can tell you that the same front-end IC used should work in the US for GSM. The problem isn't the technology, I guessing its the carriers (ATT, Cingular, TMobile) who either don't think people will buy it, or they can't figure out how to squeeze more cash out of the people who do buy it.

      The Mot chipset used has both dual-band and quad-band front-end ICs, and actually was designed for GSM (the VCO is capable of hitting the 4 main GSM bands - 850/900/1800/1900). However transferring to a different protocol isn't quite as trivial as you make it sound. The 3G and CDMA specs are harder than GSM, so to do a multi-protocol capable part you need to design to the most extreme/hardest specs of all the protocols combined (this is not a new concept, but it typically fails because the resultant part is not competitive with the protocol-specific parts on either cost, current drain - aka battery life, or any number of other factors).

  2. OMG by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 5, Funny

    300+ submissions and one was finally accepted. Time to tell the wife and kiddies... :) I've finally made it to the ranks for geekdom. Now, if only someone would sell me their extremely low /. number... something under 5000 perhaps?

    1. Re:OMG by CompressedAir · · Score: 5, Funny

      It seems the trick was to pack in as many links as possible.

    2. Re:OMG by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      300+ submissions??? Damn, that's persistance.
      Was there a wife and kiddies before the first submission? Perhaps you could post a timeline.

  3. Not an option by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 3, Funny

    The only downside is that it appear to only be available in China right now.

    Well I suppose you could learn Chinese, but paying for around-the-world roaming fees will probably screw you.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  4. Deprivation of these toys by IchBinDasWalross · · Score: 3, Insightful

    We in the US are last to get this technology because we embrace it not as fully. We still have lots of landlines and service that isn't as crappy as the ones that I used in London. Europe seems to have less advanced systems, so they are more eager to make the jump away from their crappy POTS. We live in a land filled with mediocre service that people don't hate fullly enough.

    --
    Mod "Overrated" instead of replying "I disagree with you," you coward.
    1. Re:Deprivation of these toys by Yokaze · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Bad landlines in Europe? IRC, some DSL standard had to be modified to accomodate the american landlines (smaller diameter, in average larger distance from the switch).

      I guess it depends on where you live. Maybe the US is much more diverse than you think.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    2. Re:Deprivation of these toys by radish · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm not really sure what you're talking about. When I lived in London my phone worked fine all the time (which is all I expect a POTS line to do), and was cheaper than my line here in NYC, which didn't work when I first got it and has failed again in the 4 months I've had it. So what exactly makes a landline "crappy"?

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  5. A Few Reasons it isn't in the USA by al701 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    1) FCC - They have to approve every device and this takes time.
    2) Slow adoption rate. The USA isn't big on advanced cells. Not like Europe or Asia.
    3) Usually the better phones are GSM. Only recently has GSM become a real option here in the states.

    Also: If this type of stuff interestes you, check out Smart Mobs and the book, it is excellent.

    1. Re:A Few Reasons it isn't in the USA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The real stoppers are:
      • cell phone owners in the US are charged for receiving (!) calls
      • local calls in the US typically are not charged by the minute (here in Italy we pay about 75 cents per hour), so getting a POTS line is cheap
      • competing standards a no GSM until a few years ago made the market uninteresting to most cellular-companies (you mentioned this in point 3)
    2. Re:A Few Reasons it isn't in the USA by otis+wildflower · · Score: 3, Informative

      The USA isn't big on advanced cells. Not like Europe or Asia.

      None of the advanced features US providers are dreaming about will happen until we see a whole lot more flat-rate action. Americans simply will not pay what Asians and Europeans are willing to for stuff like GPRS, SMS/MMS, etc. LTIC most European plans are still per-minute with per-message charges in SMS and per-KB data transfer charges. No all-you-can-eat plans.

      I can guarantee you that 'cellular data' will go nowhere until it's available flat-rate all-you-can-eat. Same goes for MMS, location-based services, etc. Americans just want flat-rate and are willing to wait for it. This may be happening with Sprint and ATT, but I believe all-you-can-eat data, sms/mms and local voice needs to be $50/mo for it to take off.

      Ergo, those phones which enable those services will not be as appealing: why pay extra for something that is not affordable to use?

      And it seems to be something the wireless companies need to learn over and over and over again.

  6. The last thing I want by Slowtreme · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Reading Word Docs on my cell phone. Combo devices... Meh

    --
    Post: Sigged, for your pleasure.
  7. Makes sense by nil5 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This is pretty much a continuation of a trend that began a few years ago. We see many embedded devices using open source, particularly linux. It makes sense for many reasons, but the bottom line is that open source is inexpensive (ie free?) and widely used, which makes development more efficient.

    The really interesting thing, as I see it, is the integration we will be able to get when many devices run linux. I would love to be able to integrate my cell phone with my pda with my computer with my wireless access point. the possibilities are endless when we converge on common standards.

  8. Not open however... by JohnGrahamCumming · · Score: 4, Informative

    Although this device might be using "Open Source" software the actual software in the device isn't open. No doubt they obtained commercial licenses from Sleepycat and others so that they could get around having to release their software. Which is a pity because it makes customizing the thing so much harder.

    John.

  9. ...last in the US by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The US is generally last to get new cellular toys because of the lack of a single standard. By letting the market fight it out, the FCC - whilst promoting competition amongst vendors - kinda hashed things up for the consumers.

    They did it again with Digital TV too, mandating an arguably inferior standard that isn't used much elsewhere, so that the domestic TV manufacturers would be happy. Now, if they'd gone with DVB-T, prices everywhere around the World for DTV tuners would be lower. Ho hum. It seems the US Government doesn't get wireless. So the population can't, either :(

  10. Marketability by Sheetrock · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Why are we in the U.S. always the last to get new cellular toys?

    There is a certain reliability factor we expect in U.S. equipment. Keep in mind that these fancy Linux phones are bleeding-edge and likely quite unstable compared to your standard PCS or analog phone. Additionally, with the amount of geography we've got to cover, the support for newer technologies just isn't there in our cell towers.

    Canada's in an even worse situation, technically speaking. Even though it's easier to deploy wireless than it used to be to get phone service out to rural areas, the towers still require service.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Marketability by Narcissus · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Excuse me if I'm mistaken, but are you trying to say that GSM is "newer technology"??

      Australia has been using GSM for at least 8 or 9 years, it's not new technology. I don't mean to offend, but the lack of US support for GSM for so many years feels, to an outsider, as though it's more because it's supported so heavily elsewhere!

      Plus, regarding the geography you have to cover: Australia, again, is about 70% of the area of the main "chunk" of the United States, and yet they don't seem to have much problem. The way I see it, with the higher population density, it would actually be more economical for the US to provide these so called "newer technologies" than Australia, for instance...

    2. Re:Marketability by frostman · · Score: 4, Informative

      Yeah, right.

      In San Francisco, a wealthy tech-savvy city, my Sprint PCS phone drops network randomly as I walk through the financial district. In Noe Valley I have four antennas on one side of the $tarbucks and zero on the other side of it.

      In Budapest, an up-and-coming (and much larger) yet by no means wealthy Central European city, the only time I ever lose connectivity above ground is for 20 minutes after midnight on New Year's.

      Face it, the US cellphone infrastructure is many, many years behind Europe's in terms of reliability and signal quality (and IMHO revenue concept).

      As for the reliability of the handsets themselves, you may have a point - or you may not, since your point contradicts US behavior in other tech markets (PDAs spring to mind).

      --

      This Like That - fun with words!

  11. Handys in Germany by derphilipp · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As I can speak for Europe (Germany), each kid (12 and up !) here needs the newest toy on the market.
    Handys are everywhere - but not mainly to call someone - especially Teenagers are sending hundrets of SMS per month - for 30-40 Euro-cents each !
    Photo-Handys and MMS are on their way, the market is growing and growing.

    Handys are a definitely a status symbol -
    You've got one ? - You're one of us.
    You've got that old-styled Nokia Handy from last Season ? You're such a dork !

    --
    Spelling mistakes: My is english spoken not tongue of mother.
    1. Re:Handys in Germany by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      A a fellow German, let me tell you that the term "handy" means nothing to non-Germans. At least nothing cellphone-related. ;-)

    2. Re:Handys in Germany by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Funny

      As I can speak for Europe

      Exactly when were you appointed official spokesperson for all of Europe?

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  12. centericq, vnc, and gkrellm too!?! by planckscale · · Score: 5, Funny
    That's all I need is an always on centericq text message center with gkrellm running to let me know when I have new emails, my cpu usage and maybe a virtual desktop into any IP address while on speakerphone with live video with gps location and news and weather alerts vibrating color ringtones bash shell mp3 playing miniDVDdiskburner ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhh *splat* head explodes

    --
    Namaste
  13. great by Triumph+The+Insult+C · · Score: 5, Funny

    now, not only do i have to deal with people talking on cell phones while driving, i potentially have to deal with people compiling kernels on their cell phones while driving

    --
    vodka, straight up, thank you!
    1. Re:great by RevAaron · · Score: 3, Funny

      Judging from the Zaurus [1], we'll probably find out that this handset can kinda sorta make phone calls. But check this out! You can run MySQL on it! And PHP! And X11! See how cute my phone is at a LUG meeting, although during the rest of the week it goes unused...

      [1] Enter Zaurus cheerleader, who says: "It's not supposed to be a good PDA! It's a PMT, not a PDA! *frothing at mouth*"

      --

      Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  14. funny... by djupedal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The only downside is that it appear to only be available in China right now

    Downside for you, maybe. No downside for anyone that lives/works where these devices are used.

    1. Re:funny... by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Also not a downside for those who simply want a phone, and really dont care about the politics or philosophy of the firmware inside such phone.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    2. Re:funny... by dontspellsogood · · Score: 2, Interesting

      It is a downside for those of us who just want a fricken phone + phone # storage. Im surprised that most phone makes don't offer a basic model for each of model lines. No bells or whistles, just a good reliable phone. Imagine how long my Motorola V2260 would last with one of these new batteries (which have to power colour displays, sound chips, flash memory, mp3 players, an advanced OS, toast maker, Tony Hawk 3). I just hope mine doesn't die anytime soon.

      --
      No, reelly I don't!
  15. Please deposit $699 to make a call by AtariAmarok · · Score: 4, Funny

    Full of open source?

    "Please deposit $699 for the next 3 minutes. Thank you for using Cingudarl."

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  16. Legalities by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Not just that, but a litigation-heavy court system and a class-action popular mindset make us the last place anyone wants to try something new.

  17. also note... by segment · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Motorola claims to be the number one manufacturer of handsets in China, where IDC estimates there are 252.3 million current mobile telephone subscribers. By 2007, the Chinese mobile phone market is forecast to reach 371.4 million subscribers.

    In other words... China has the United States' (or soon will have) population already as a customer in China. Do the math... Do I release it in the US and sell about 50-100 million (wishfully thinking), or do I do with a solid 100+ million Gee willikers what would you do...

    Opinionater bastard

  18. Re:Why not in the US by RoyalCheese · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ooooh.. its linux.. oooh its not linux.. So fucking what? Is it any better as a mobile phone than its competitors or not? If you buy a phone purely because its operating system is open source, then you are focusing on something immaterial to the function (and styling) of the phone. You could have bought something that suited your needs better if you weren't so hung up on your "open source is best" or "MS is best" dogma!

  19. Office file compatibility? by www.sorehands.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does that mean that the phone will run all of the word/excel macro virii/viruses?

  20. But do they include the source code? by plinius · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's no point in calling it open source if the sources aren't available. And somehow I doubt that yet another big company embracing open source will actually include the sources with the product.

  21. Re:I'm not buying it. by simon_hzero · · Score: 2, Informative

    And loads of other Motorolas - v500/525, v600, a830, a835, a920, a925, amongst others...

  22. Re:Why not in the US by RevAaron · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, not really. There isn't any SyncML for the Zaurus, which does Linux+Qtopia just like this phone. Whereas a lot of other phones running every other OS does support SyncML. You'd probably have a better chance of your computer talking to a SyncML-enabled phone rather than whatever PIM API Trolltech/Sharp/Mot is using this week.

    --

    Working toward a usable PDA environment in the spirit of Newton OS: Dynapad
  23. Re:What next .... by RLW · · Score: 2, Funny

    no kidding. not only did I have a toaster running in 2001, I now have a fridge with a PS2 compatibility mode: which as turns out was a big mistake as now the eggs are always trash talking the frozen waffles about who's best at GTA. It's a bad confluence to have over teched appliances filled with sapient GM foods. Where will it end?

  24. Buying mobile phones by Guanix · · Score: 2

    My impression is that Americans aren't used to buying mobile phones themselves, even though it's easy with GSM. This impression comes from the fact that all the US bloggers whom I read always refer to "[AT&T/Nextel/other telco] doesn't offer [latest model] yet".

  25. Re:How much? by twaltari · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You make it sound as if it was a natural and logical billing principle; The truth is, in US the cell phone numbers weren't allocated under a separate area code (which is the standard in many countries). A basic principle of billing phone calls says the caller should always know roughly how much the call will cost him. In US the caller cannot see from the number whether it is a cell phone or wired one. Thus the telco charges cell phone owners even when receiving calls (the same priciple rest of the world uses whenever the cell phone is roaming).

    About call "plans" (prepaid monthly minutes) you mentioned; That's sick and wrong. The greedy telco makes you pay for calls you are only planning to make. I refuse to ever pay anything but actual calls, billed afterwards by seconds.

    Other shotrcomings of cell phone service in USA include the complete lack of SIM cards (separation of service and phone equipment), limited support for SMS and typical half-a-year-minumum service provider lock-in. Luckily number portability is on the way.

    Needless to say, I'm European.

  26. Re:Why not in the US by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 2, Funny

    UM, the A760 (which has Linux OS base just like the A768) has been released in all of Europe and Asia. Its that neither are available in the US. And considering that there are so few Windows-based phones available in the U.S., Microsoft is probably happy to just have them. Sure... they won't like Motorola doing Linux phones anymore than they like Dell selling Linux instead of Windows, but they're not in a position to be dominant in the cell phone market right now. Studies have proven that embedded Linux is better than embedded Windows and nobody wants their cell phone to blue screen on them. The best cell phones are Java and Linux based. MS will have to fight hard to dominate that market. Of course, knowing them, they're probably about to release a MS Cell Phone that needs a 200 character license key to activate.