Slashdot Mirror


Videogame Pirate Gets Long Jail Sentence

Thanks to the San Jose Business Journal for its article discussing the sentencing of a notable videogame pirate to 50 months in prison after being found guilty on charges of "copyright infringement and... mail fraud." According to the piece: "[Sean Michael] Breen... admitted that he was a leader in the Internet-based piracy group known as Razor1911. Since the early 1990s, Razor1911 had sought to achieve a reputation in the underground Internet piracy community... as the leading distributor of cracked computer and console game software." A report at GameSpot has further details, noting Razor1911 "...acquired advance copies of [videogame] titles by posing as reviewers for fictitious game magazines and having them shipped to a derelict storefront address in Oakland."

92 comments

  1. Whoa... by Pxtl · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think I had some of their warez back in the day (considering posting anon now... fuck it). Still, I can see how the whole "posing as reviewers" thing could be crossing the line.

    Sucks to be 'em. Still, seems kinda harsh - what's Ken Lay getting again?

    1. Re:Whoa... by Babbster · · Score: 5, Informative
      It seems that this Slashdot submission ignores the part of the article that probably contributed the most towards the 4+-year sentence:

      "Mr. Breen also admitted that he had illegally used an online customer account of Cisco Systems to order hundreds of thousands of dollars of hardware by falsely posing as one of Cisco's existing customers."
      "After receiving the hardware, Mr. Breen sold it on the grey market at a heavy discount off the normal price of the hardware, prosecutors say."

      He was stealing real physical property in addition to his software piracy. The fact that it was worth "hundreds of thousands of dollars" made the copyright violations almost superfluous. In light of those violations, the sentence doesn't seem harsh at all.

    2. Re:Whoa... by curtisk · · Score: 1

      same here....when I was reading the summary and saw Razor1911 I felt all nostalgic and such. They definately were well known and had great "market-saturation" so to speak...

      --

      Sehr geehrter Toilettenbenutzer!

    3. Re:Whoa... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Given the copyright infringement is a civil matter, it does seem unlikely that he would get a jail sentence for that. He made two mistakes. One, like you said, he posed as someone else and ordered equipment in their name and took it. The other would be mail fraud. That's a felony and the government is really fascist about protecting its mail system. I believe that railroad strikers in the 1800s were commonly beat-up on charges that they were interfering with the delivery of mail.

  2. I for one applaud by foidulus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know I'm running a flame risk here, but I for one applaud this arrest. It's people like this that enable companies to rationalize(in lawyers terms anyway) DRM rights systems, which annoy the living crap out of people who actually pay for these things and like to support developers/artists/whatever
    Now the fact that he got caught showed just how dumb he was. Trying to steal hardware like that always leaves too many traces around, and if the company has the money, it will influence law enforcement to do the investigation. I dunno if this will start a "scared straight" program with warezers, or maybe they'll just keep to their little gated communities now. Hopefully a high-profile case of a really prolific pirates will ensure that game companies don't need to go the way of the RIAA, at least not anymore than they have.

  3. Too Harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    50 months? It's his lawyer's fault, easily. You can get away with murder in the U.S. if you have the right representation. We have a truly screwed up justice system.

    1. Re:Too Harsh by Stubtify · · Score: 1
      And a better alternative?

      Be careful to criticize something without having a replacement handy to refer to.

    2. Re:Too Harsh by Curtman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Depends how you define better I guess. The US has the highest incarceration rate in the world from what I hear. There certainly seems to be more effective systems out there.

    3. Re:Too Harsh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And a better alternative?
      Be careful to criticize something without having a replacement handy to refer to.


      Uhhh, how about we just fix it? Is that simple enough for you to understand?

      Beleive it or not, buddy, there are some folks already trying to do this in other areas of law!

      Be careful criticizing anyting around those "love it or leave it" types. They're notoriously closed minded.

  4. I doubt it, he's a gamer by Kingfox · · Score: 4, Funny
    Quote the article:
    According to court documents and his own confession, Breen and other Razor1911 members acquired, cracked, and sold advance copies of Quake, Command & Conquer Red Alert, Terminal Velocity, Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos, and many other games.

    If he were a Linux user, that list would consist of Tuxracer and... err... yeah.
    1. Re:I doubt it, he's a gamer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How exactly does one crack Tuxracer?

  5. He'll be missed by redune45 · · Score: 1

    It does make sense to be sending someone to jail for this.
    I know of many people who have made huge use of his products though.
    LAN party I held two weeks ago would have been much more dificult without the Razor hacked version of Steam (For Counter Strike) since we weren't able to keep the internet connection up.

    --
    redune.com: The World 3.2 Megapixels at a time
    1. Re:He'll be missed by Kris_J · · Score: 1, Insightful
      It does make sense to be sending someone to jail for this.
      Why? Vengance? Why not home detention or hefty fines? What possible reason other than spitefulness could the community have to go to the expense of jailing this individual? Was he violent, likely to attack video game publishers, firebomb an office?
    2. Re:He'll be missed by dakryx · · Score: 4, Informative

      His major screw up was the mail fraud. Don't scew with the mail system, the goverment doesn't fuck around when it comes to that.

    3. Re:He'll be missed by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Interesting
      LAN party I held two weeks ago would have been much more dificult without the Razor hacked version of Steam (For Counter Strike) since we weren't able to keep the internet connection up.

      What do you need Steam for? The older versions of Half-Life and Counter-strike don't require an Internet connection. Why not just use the pre-steam version? Personally I tried going back to Counter-Strike after a 1 year hiatus playing BF1942 and when I found Steam was the only real way you can play these days I gave up. It sucks horribly. I guess that's one way to kill a game.

    4. Re:He'll be missed by GTRacer · · Score: 1
      Hey-y-y...I bet someone could write a good story about mail fraud... It could be a thriller, maybe involving a larger crime so that the fraud doesn't seem important until the VERY END, where it becomes clear that committing mail fraud will get you in big trouble, buddy!

      GTRacer
      - Nothing better to do

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    5. Re:He'll be missed by thegrommit · · Score: 1


      Hey-y-y...I bet someone could write a good story about mail fraud... It could be a thriller, maybe involving a larger crime so that the fraud doesn't seem important until the VERY END, where it becomes clear that committing mail fraud will get you in big trouble, buddy!


      It was called The Untouchables ;)

    6. Re:He'll be missed by thegrommit · · Score: 1

      It was called The Untouchables ;)

      Don't mind me - just after posting that, I remembered that Capone was convicted for tax fraud.

    7. Re:He'll be missed by Discoflamingo13 · · Score: 1

      You're thinking of The Firm, where mail fraud "isn't sexy, but it's got teeth".

  6. Doesn't bother me by metroid+composite · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can understand using a ROM for old games; stuff you can no longer find. I haven't done it myself (...honest) but I know plenty of people who have especially for games more than five years old, and it doesn't bother me. Lying, just to get a game a few days early in order to get a jump start on cracking it is pushing things very far.

    1. Re:Doesn't bother me by tprime · · Score: 2, Interesting

      For the different cracking groups (teams?) it is an ego based competition to see who can get the software cracked and available to the public the quickest. I wouldn't be surprised if any of the other big name groups do the same stunt, or have a connection with someone whose company really does the reviews. Hell, I would be willing to bet that some of the groups have connections inside of the development houses as well. Kind of makes you think about the Half-Life 2 "theft" differently...

      --
      http://www.tomandemily.com
    2. Re:Doesn't bother me by Diane302 · · Score: 1

      I agree, with a minor stipulation: there are a few games five years old or older that are still being sold. Warcraft II comes immediately to mind. I think your first line - "stuff you can no longer find" - says it best. I have heard arguments that this restricts the company's options to re-release it, rather like Activision did with the old Infocom text adventures. All I can really say to that is, if I like a game enough that I'm using a cracked copy because I couldn't find a "legal" one and a new legal one is released, I'll buy it.

  7. sounds like a scapegoating by sethstorm · · Score: 1

    To think of the people quoting about crimes such as murder getting less, it appears to be a
    straight-out scapegoating of this guy. I just hope they dont pull a Novell and give some sob the
    hardware. I dont think even OJ's lawyers could help here, since they'd be dealing with punks
    such as the SIIA.

    --
    Twitter supports and protects racists - by smearing their critics with the "Hate Speech" label.
  8. A few things I'd like to mention by __aailob1448 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    First of all, The severity of the sentence is due to the mail fraud breen engaged in. And quite a fraud it was: $600.000 (even if it's likely inflated) is no small amount of money.

    Second, this is really nothing to applaud or rejoice over. The arrest of one or two dozen pirates does not even scratch the tip of the iceberg. The authorities know it but they still bust a group or two every couple of years for PR purposes. It does not affect the so-called "warez scene" at all. All game were pirated before this happened and all have continued to be pirated afterwards.

    Third. I am very surprised to read that Razor1911 sold copies. To the extent of my knowledge, they are (Because they are still alive and kicking)a veteran and respected group in the warez scene and the one big No-No is the selling of pirated materials. In fact, Razor1911's nfo file (an .nfo file contains information about a given release and the logo and signature of the group that released it) states very clearly:
    SUPPORT THE COMPANIES THAT PRODUCE QUALITY SOFTWARE! IF YOU ENJOYED THIS PRODUCT, BUY IT! SOFTWARE AUTHORS DESERVE SUPPORT!!
    So either they are really big hypocrites or the press got it wrong (I'm gonna go with option B here...)

    And of course, stealing is wrong, I don't condone piracy, don't have sex unprotected, yadda yadda...
    1. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The arrest of one or two dozen pirates does not even scratch the tip of the iceberg. The authorities know it but they still bust a group or two every couple of years for PR purposes.

      Pretty much the same thing as the drug war. Make a "big" bust every once in a while to make it look like you're doing something, yet the supply is basically unchanged (or at best you cause a minor inconvience.)

    2. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by gl4ss · · Score: 2, Interesting

      nature of such groups is that they can't control themselfs totally, or every individual.

      but yeah.. the arrests made barely a dent.. and those who were/are arrested were/are doing other criminal activities as well usually(ranging from cracking ftp's to be used as 'public ftp's or just plain _stealing_ gigabytes and gigabytes of bandwith from their work).

      not that stuff wasn't always copied by somebody when it was possible for practically free(for the copier).. from university textbooks to vhs's cassettes of old tv episodes to ringtones(sometimes even out of perceived necessity as the one copying for himself can't either afford the real deal or it is not available, or is ridiculously priced).

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    3. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by sobeks_eye · · Score: 5, Interesting
      All game were pirated before this happened and all have continued to be pirated afterwards.

      That's possibly the worst grammar I've ever seen in a Slashdot post.

      I like the way things are now with the piracy game. It's a safe way for kids to rebel against "the man", doesn't usually involve other vices, and is something you can grow out of when you get a job.

      For me, software piracy was something I participated in until I was about 22, inertia carrying me past my teens. As a teenager, this was the only way I had at my disposal to get the latest games (back then the latest games were of the "Bolo" and "Rescue Raiders" variety).

      As an adult, it actually cost me more in time and money to pirate games than it would have to just drop $40 on what looked the coolest. I had to invest in a CD burner, which was expensive at the time, as well as a Zip drive, and the media they required (also pricey at the time). Not to mention having a family to support meant that I had a lot more to lose than I did at 16. At 16 I was a punk with a chip on my shoulder, and never bothered to cover my tracks. Stupid. Lucky. But anyway, I grew out of it.

      Video game companies will rail and demand justice, but the kids will still be given leeway with this vice.

      The advanced copy grift was a different matter, though. First, it's a bad con -- that will always get you caught eventually. Second, it's an adult who is deliberately defrauding a company by posing as someone he's not. Screw him. I don't want him representing the software piracy market. He's a bad example. Give me back the whiz kids who buy a game (or shoplift it if circumstances warrant) and defeat the copy protection or write a crack. That's just good fun.

    4. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      Damn I've been stealing coffee from work and I never noticed till now. Thanks for the update.

    5. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      The drug trade and the warez trade are both safety valves for society. People want distractions and so drugs are allowed to propogate, they aren't allowed to become the norm because they ruin lives and cause people to be unproductive members of society.

      The government understands that intelligent people crave information. The software industry seems to be continuing to produce and the music industry continues to produce so who needs to step in.

    6. Re:A few things I'd like to mention by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

      All game were pirated before this happened and all have continued to be pirated afterwards. and All Your base are .... ...nah forget it.

      --
      READY.
      PRINT ""+-0
  9. Jailtime? by Kris_J · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I find it hard to justify jailtime for offences relating to videogames. Hefty fines, sure. Community service, why not. But jail should be reserved for people that are a physical threat to the community. How much more is this person going to cost society during those 50 months?

    1. Re:Jailtime? by foidulus · · Score: 0

      On that same note then you could say that ol' "Kenny Boy" Lay shouldn't do any time, just some fines and a little volunteering with the kiddies down at Enron field? Where is the detterent? Kenny Boy wasn't a "physical threat to the community" as you state. I think he should have to go to jail for what he did though.
      If someone doesn't want to pay for games, there are plenty of OSS games out there, if they don't like the quality, the source is right there, they can improve it themselves. Nobody is forcing you to buy these games, humans have survived without them for a long time, I think that the current generation of humans is no different. However I do think that game companys should continue to release shareware versions of their programs, takes away the try before you buy argument of the software pirates.

    2. Re:Jailtime? by Rallion · · Score: 1

      Yeah, the current generation is no different than people, say 100 years ago. Except they didn't have crack, and we do. And they didn't have video games, and we do.

      No, I don't think it's a stretch. You take me off games for three days (Say, to do a huge project) and I will go fucking nuts. At least I never got the urge to kill somebody in real life, though. That was kind of surprising.

      In order to stay on-topic, I agree that a fine is not an appropriate deterrent. But I have to stress even more that it's not an appropriate punishment. Think about it. The fine should be equal to or greater than the value of the damage done. The damage that could be attributed to this one person, even if you split the value of each release and download by the number of people in the group, is EASILY in the hundreds of thousands. The truth is, for those who don't know (not that I do...) is that Razor has gotta be one of the top three release groups for rips. Name a game released in the last, oh, I'll say seven years, and they've probably ripped it and distributed it. The courts don't issue, or estimate the value of, fines that big. They just lock you up for a bit.

    3. Re:Jailtime? by Matchstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      The "jailtime" is for mail fraud. Read the article and you'll learn that he defrauded Cisco of $600K worth of hardware in order to sell it on the grey market.

    4. Re:Jailtime? by kabocox · · Score: 1

      He'll be a net profit to the jail system. They charge inmates for just about everything. In the states that I'm aware of, all inmates have to have some sort of work or labor to pay for it. I'd hope that he could just arrange a deal where he spends the weekend in jail for the next several years and just has a large fine to pay. Most murders usually get out under 10 years. Then again murders just target individuals, they don't target corporations so the sentences aren't as heavy. One of these days I should complain where it will make an effect.

    5. Re:Jailtime? by Radius9 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I actually am a professional game developer, and I think this guy's sentence is WAY too harsh. Speaking as someone who works in the video game industry day in and day out, I have never seen anyone in the business overly concerned with piracy one way or another, its just one of those things considered a given. Anyway, the real point of my message is to say not only is this guy going to cost society for the next 50 months, but he will continue to be a cost after he gets out. Do you really think that once he gets out he will be a fine "rehabilitated" member of society, able to contribute in a positive fashion? Of course not. Personally, I think a more fitting punishment for a pirate would be to make him work in the video game industry for free, doing things like coming up with better copy protection, testing games, hell, even programming. Let him see what goes into writing a video game while gives something back to the industry that lost in the first place. But I don't believe the guy belongs in jail for piracy (if he stole hardware from Cisco, that's another matter that I'm not going to weigh in on.)

    6. Re:Jailtime? by StressedEd · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think a more fitting punishment for a pirate would be to make him work in the video game industry for free, doing things like coming up with better copy protection, testing games, hell, even programming.

      Don't be silly, that would be far too sensible! Far easier to "bang em up" and be seen to be doing justice.... :-/

      I really need a cynisism cure...

      --
      Be nice to people on the way up. You will meet them again on your way down!
    7. Re:Jailtime? by Babbster · · Score: 1
      if he stole hardware from Cisco, that's another matter that I'm not going to weigh in on.

      That's hilarious. So, you just ignore some of the charges which sent the guy up the river and declare the sentence "WAY too harsh"? It's like declaring a life sentence too harsh for a burglar who kills the homeowner during the burglary because you've decided not to "weigh in on" the murder charge.

    8. Re:Jailtime? by Radius9 · · Score: 1

      My comment was a general comment about the government busting pirates, and making a big deal about Razor1911. They didn't mention enough details about the Cisco theft for me to make any sort of reasonably valid evaluation about what he may have done and/or stole. Nonetheless, I still think that putting the guy in jail for 50 months is way too harsh, even if he did steal $600,000 of Cisco equipment, and I also believe that throwing him in jail for 50 months is not going to accomplish anything. He's not going to be rehabilitated when he gets out, nor is anything useful going to come out of him being locked up. Therefore I believe his sentence is way too harsh, whether I am weighing in on the Cisco theft or not. So I stand by original comment, although I do apologize for being unclear in how it was worded.

    9. Re:Jailtime? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really need a cynisism cure...

      And a god damned dictionary. Ass.

  10. Re:...the cracker by foidulus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well, if they don't like the program and it's costs, DON'T USE IT! Use (and contribute to) OSS instead. It's like people complaining that Adobe prices photoshop too high so they are forced to pirate it. Well, the Gimp is out there for free, and if you want a feature implemented, the Gimp is open source, you are free to add whatever features you want. Simple as that. You know, I don't want to plunk down $35k for an SUV because I don't think they are worth that much, but does that give me the right to go out and steal one? Of course not. We are lucky to have such a dedicated OSS community. On some projects, the quality might not be as high as you like, but YOU have the power to change that.
    I hate how people seem to have this sense of entitlement to software. The software company doesn't exist for your benefit, as it shouldn't. Most of it's not essential to live and succeed, and the stuff that is(OS, internet browser, and Office program) all have both closed and open source versions. If you feel that the closed source version is what you want, then go out and buy a copy. If you don't want to pay that much for it, or you just don't plain want it, go with open source. Or create your own. Maybe if you were the one who created content you might be much less supportive of the pirate community.

  11. MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    It's people like this that enable companies to rationalize(in lawyers terms anyway) DRM rights systems, which annoy the living crap out of people who actually pay for these things and like to support developers/artists/whatever

    So, you've been modded +5 because you think that piracy is responsible for DRM. Right. Theft is responsible for higher prices in the shops, too. Alright.

    But let me tell you something. If piracy and theft would stop to exist there would be...

    1) less competition for people who produce crap. George Lucas could sell much more of his fucked up Star Wars versions if people wouldn't already have the pirated/theatrical versions.

    2) DRM and high prices in shops certainly would continue to exist. (Piracy and theft were nice to justify greed but WTF?)

    Like it or hate it. I have ~70 years to live and I won't waste time to spend money on greedy people or bullshit that I can get for cheap or for nothing (especially if it was produced in a foreign country).

    Piracy is competition.

    1. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Piracy is competition.


      No, other products are the competition for your hard-earned dollar.

      I have ~70 years to live


      Making you what, 5 years old?
    2. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, other products are the competition for your hard-earned dollar.

      You need more education.

      He said "Piracy is competition" because you can get pirated versions from products nobody can/would sell you. Like the theatrical version of Star Wars.

      That should be enough for now. Go and study.

    3. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I mean the parent of my parent.

    4. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN - CLUELESS KARMA WHORE!!! by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Why did you post this AC?

      Oh yeah. The number of /. drones who talk a good talk but really know nothing.

      Like it or not, the above poster is right. Piracy IS competition. It's basic economics. One of the forces that keeps prices down and service up is the presence of some black/grey market activity that pepole can go to if they feel it's worth it.

      This is especially true for "cultural' goods. (Mostly entertainment. It helps that it's easily copied).

      And yes, if there were no theft, prices would be higher and there would be more DRM because they would think they could get away with it. (Why the DRM? They'd try and stomp out the secondary market. Nobody said they had to give you the ability to sell your used media..even if you do have the right).

  12. Re:...the cracker by Rallion · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Razor distrubuted far more games than apps. The two realms are totally different. I can't believe that OSS could ever possibly be a solution for commercial games.

    I'd like to agree with the rest of the things you said, though. Except I can't. Because it would make me a terrible hypocrite.

  13. Oh no, poor Guybrush! by HoppQ · · Score: 5, Funny

    I know Guybrush Threepwood always went around claiming to be a mighty pirate, but he really was pretty harmless. Oh well, guess the wait for the next Monkey Island game is going to be pretty long.

    What's that you say? A different kind of videogame pirate was jailed, not Guybrush? Oh, my bad, I just read the headline and assumed the worst.

    --
    My sig will be released in 2015 third quarter. Rating pending.
  14. For people who yell RTFM you should the RTFA by Bruce+J+L · · Score: 5, Informative

    Please people how many times must you be told that the jail was for stealing 600k worth of cisco hardware. Steal that much and you deserve jail time.

    --
    Karma's over rated. Speak your mind.
  15. Re:...the cracker by Fallout2man · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First of all, your comparison to SUVs is like apples to Oranges. an SUV is a tangible physical good, software is entirely intellectual property. As well, I know this is probably the billionth time it's been said. Piracy is not theft, it is copyright infringement, there is a world of difference.

    Secondly, most applications, such as the ones you mention, have more then enough business customers that every person who needed it for a hobby or curiosity pirated it, they'd barely see a difference in profits.

    I also highly doubt OSS will ever fit the need for games anytime in the next 20 to 30 years, especially with the increased demands for higher and higher quality models/textures/other art stuff. You could be the best programmer in the world, have an engine and all the code finished, and not be able to make a good game merely because you lack good artists/modelers/etc willing to contribute to a "free" game.

  16. Re:...the cracker by foidulus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Once again, nothing is stopping you or any other artist from contributing to OSS, OSS doesn't just entail software developers. A lot of starting artists I'm sure would love to contribute because it would look great in their portfolio. They probably just aren't really aware of the opportunity to do so, so it's up to the supporters of OSS to show them there is a world out there where than can basically do shameless advertising/portfolio stuffing.
    That being said, it would be nice if companys would contribute some of their old models/textures to the OSS movement, ie when Quake III(just an example, Id might already do this for all I know) stops selling well, they should contribute some of the models(and code!) to the OSS movement.

  17. Re:...the cracker by Fallout2man · · Score: 2, Informative

    There is nothing "stopping" anyone. There are a lot of "free" modifacations for commercial games too, those have lots of artists and art. However the majority (there are exceptions) of those modifacations have art assets that are usually inferrior in comparison to the game their modding for. A lot of the stuff is very fun, but generally not of a quality you'd deem on the same level as the 40/50$ game you are getting it for.

    Not to rag on anyone or anyone's work, but frankly I think OSS has a ways to go before the concept of "free" is enticing enough to get free games that can compare with their commercially successful bretheren such as UT2K3 or Quake III. It can go there and may eventually do so, but it's got a big hurdle to overcome in the art area, especially with ever increasing quality standards (meaning more time required per art asset).

    The day "free" can compete in terms of quality on all levels with commercial games is a day I'd welcome, however it's going to take a long while to get there.

  18. Good thing he didn't shoot anyone. by cleancut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He might have received a shorter sentence, and we wouldn't want that for such a naughty person!

    I'm not claiming he didn't break the law, nor am I suggesting that he shouldn't "do the time". I'm just pointing out inconsistencies in sentencing, and how criminal geeks often get longer terms than murderers. *sigh*

    1. Re:Good thing he didn't shoot anyone. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thats not true but ok. Where did you get that information from, your ass? Come on. If you're going to make a claim, at least say where you got your info from.

  19. Re:...the cracker by FroMan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Razor distrubuted far more games than apps. The two realms are totally different. I can't believe that OSS could ever possibly be a solution for commercial games.

    What does it matter that Razor distributed games rather than apps? Both require developers to produce. If you do not like the fact that a game is $50+, don't play it until it hits the $20 rack, or $10 rack, or what ever level rack you feel it is worth. But also do not play the game until you have bought it. Otherwise the developers will not get the point that you think they charge too much for their games, they will see you as a pirate taking what they have spent time and effort writing so they can take a paycheck home at the end of the week.

    --
    Norris/Palin 2012
    Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  20. Re:XBox rules!! by cableshaft · · Score: 1

    Looks like you aren't the only person here who has an XBox.

    --
    Creator of the popular web game Proximity
  21. Waitaminute - they SOLD the games? by JonBovi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article claims that Razor "sold" over a half-million dollars of software - don't they mean "copied and gave away?" I've seen tons of Razor releases, but never heard about them making a penny off of it.

    I know that the N.E.T. act makes it a federal crime to even _share_ illegal copies, but still, there's a difference, or at least there should be.

    1. Re:Waitaminute - they SOLD the games? by robnauta · · Score: 1
      The article claims that Razor "sold" over a half-million dollars of software - don't they mean "copied and gave away?" I've seen tons of Razor releases, but never heard about them making a penny off of it.

      Maybe you didn't hear enough then. When I read the article I clearly read that in addition to spreading their warez all over Internet they also made a lot of money selling warez.

      But the summary also chose not to mention the majority of the 50 months sentence was for carding, ordering over a million dollar of computer hardware using fake credit cards, including about $700.000 worth of Cisco routers.

      Sure, sure you can be blind to those things, and claim he was unjustly convicted for giving the world free warez, but the truth is sometimes not as rosy as the image those guys tried to create.

  22. Re:...the cracker by wasabii · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Who the fuck cares? This isn't about OSS quality being lower. Nothing you said gives you justification for pirating games. Either buy it, or don't play it. END OF STORY.

  23. Re:...the cracker by Holi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    and if you want a feature implemented, the Gimp is open source, you are free to add whatever features you want. Simple as that.
    Oh yes, I think everyone would agree that programming a replacement for Photoshop is simple.

    This I think is the most ridiculous argument for OSS that I always hear. Not all of us a programmers, especially the ones who need the advanced features of Photoshop. Just because I can look at the source does not mean I can understand it. Oh maybe you mean I should go out and hire a programmer to implement those changes, I somehow doubt that would cost me less then the $799.00 that it cost me to purchase Photoshop.

    (admission of guilt follows)

    I used to use an illegal copy of Photoshop while I was learning it. I am sure most slashdotters have. Now that I use it to earn a living I felt it was required that I go out and purchase a valid license.

    --
    Sorry, teleporters just kill you and then make a copy. A perfect, soul-less copy.
  24. Just four years? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    In America, you can get four times that for being gay.

  25. Yahoo Games is Cool by linzeal · · Score: 1

    I like the yahoo games service myself, $14.95 ain't killing me even as a student. I have played Freelancer, Arcanum, and an American Tail Movie Book when I was really drunk and I have not even gone through the first free 2 weeks. I know you can't get the most choice new games but hey this is like a perpetual $10 Rack and I frankly don't mind.

  26. Re:...the cracker by Coltman · · Score: 1

    While the heart of your comment I agree with. There are still some troubling solutions that have to be met. And albeit it is not a "Legal" solution in some countries. It is a solution. I for one being of the "creators of content" still support the "piracy" (for lack of a better word because it really is not piracy). It is used by many whom do not have the means to use these product.

    lets take:
    Well, if they don't like the program and it's costs, DON'T USE IT! Use (and contribute to) OSS instead. It's like people complaining that Adobe prices photoshop too high so they are forced to pirate it. Well, the Gimp is out there for free, and if you want a feature implemented, the Gimp is open source, you are free to add whatever features you want.

    Please tell that to the next HR person hiring you. When the list of required skills say "Photoshop and Visual C++" they do not want to hear "Photoshop and visual studio are too expensive, instead I use a modified gimp and gnu C compiler." (to a developer that would be more impressive, to HR they don't have a clue what you are talking about - they want Adobe and Microsoft because thats what it says) They will pick the next guy in line that "pirated" the software or is was/is wealthy enough to have purhcased it and made a point to learn it. I do not use pirated software to make the product. But I for one am glad that I had channels to go to when I needed to learn it.

    Games are a different story, Since this is the topic we are on. Games are entertainment, and are not needed as a tool to enhance or maintain you life. So: if they don't like the game and it's costs, DON'T USE IT!

    and btw this statement by Fallout2Man is correct: so correct in fact that it needs to be said again and again until everyone knows it. psst pass-it-on

    by Fallout2man (689436) on Thursday February 12, @07:18AM (#8256884)
    First of all, your comparison to SUVs is like apples to Oranges. an SUV is a tangible physical good, software is entirely intellectual property. As well, I know this is probably the billionth time it's been said. Piracy is not theft, it is copyright infringement, there is a world of difference.

    --
    - my $.02? - you can't have it...it's all I have!!
  27. And game companies never pirate? by GonzoDave · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I used to work as a tester at an independent game company. I think we had one copy at the office of each of the games we played on the LAN at lunchtime. Pirate 3DS Max copies and plugins were in use. Talking to a few people who also work at a variety of studios, I've found that this is apparently a normal course of events. Hell, the developers of Farcry got raided a week ago for pirate software. Bearing this in mind, who are developers to complain about piracy?*


    *Note, I'm not condoning it, but I think they need to take the mote out of their own eye first

  28. In related news ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    RIAA president gets hard long oiled stick in the behind.

  29. Re:...the cracker by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Agreed the recent releases from the gaming community of open source games has really made it harder to justify being a pirate. Unfortunatly some of the companies are footing the bill for the whole community.

    Case in point: ID released the doom 1 + 2 code (also quake1?) 6-7 years after their release(Copyright law says 2 years but America has it's head so far up it's ass this is saintly by comparison), Siera on the other hand hasn't released any of their orignal adventure games (Wizardrys recently repackaged, Leisure suit Larry still in boxes, King's Quest rereleased). Also they've been experimenting with all kinds of shit like Steam, now I can't have lan parties at the cottage anymore.

    Solution:Buy Doom 3, Pirate HL2 and mod communities please make mods for free engines, it really makes more sense.

  30. Re:...the cracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    but YOU have the power to change that.

    No WE don't. The fact if you want more people to use OSS you cannot expect them to contribute code to projects they need. Because they can't! They don't know C(or whatever) they don't have the time to learn because they have lives and jobs themselves.

    So, OSS projects must be ready to hear the whining of the world and not whine back, "The source is there, do it yourself"

    Please realize that you are 'better' than the rest of the world in that you are contributing to such OSS projects. Bite your lip, remember you're a great person, take the valuable information out of the whining and try and make use of it.

    -Sincerely
    OSS users

  31. Re:moment of silence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    > but I simply don't give a fuck if it is theft, I'll take what I want, society be damned.

    I'm going to laugh like a motherfucker when somebody breaks into your house.

  32. Re:...the cracker by Fallout2man · · Score: 1

    Going to be hard to pirate anything other then the half-life 2 single player only edition, since all multi-player and the mod interface is going to go through steam. :p

    Steam may eventually not require a connection to the internet but it's going to most likely discourage a lot of pirates, as even if they managed to seperate any sort of callback or key verifacation, the best you'd get is a LAN only option. I don't know about you but playing online's a big draw for me.

    Of course, I'd be likely to buy the HL2 collector's edition even if I could pirate it fully featured, since I really want to support Valve for all the hard work they're doing for the fan community.

  33. Re:...the cracker by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    How does it discourage us/them more than CDkey's?

  34. Re:...the cracker by Fallout2man · · Score: 1

    You can never stop piracy or someone intent on cracking your software. However a robust server-side key engine and file hash verification system such as what's used by MMOs are generally difficult enough to crack that they discourage most people.

    How does this sort of a system work? it's really rather simple. Every key you print for a CD you have listed in a database, when a user enters a key it's checked for a presence in the database, then mapped to that user's account. The account usually requires some form of personally identifiable information. In the rare instance a keygen is made and the pirate gets a valid unused key printed on a CD, if the real customer ever gets that box and finds their CD key doesn't work, they can contact the MMO company, prove they bought it and that is their CD key, then say goodbye to Mr. Pirate.

    Since they know the pirate had that CD key and have a method of identifying him, that paints a bulls-eye on his ass begging for legal action. Now, MMOs require online play so for steam it's a bit different. You could hack the binaries so that you could have only LAN play with other hacked binaries, however to play online you'd run into problems with both a similar CD key style database as well as hash verification to ensure files aren't hacked (what do you think the .gcf's were for?).

    It won't stop most pirates, but it will reduce the playability of the game, steam hacking may also remove the ability to load mods, which may or may not be part of steam and not the game engine itself. Were this the case you'd essentially be getting a value similar to a pirated Tribes 2, yes there was single player and LAN, but the meat and potatoes of the game was online, and you couldn't get on without a legit CD key. Half-Life 2 and Steam will present a very similar problem for pirates, with the slight difference being Half-Life 2's single player will be generally better then Tribes 2 SP.:p

  35. Re:...the cracker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Idiot. First of all, the Doom source has been out for roughly 7 years, and the game itself has been out for 10 years. Second of all, they've only released the ENGINE SOURCE to Wolf3D/Doom/Doom 2/Quake/Quake 2. The game data (maps, textures, art, characters) are still strictly copyrighted and NOT FREE.

  36. Simple hardware con artist and thief. by sudog · · Score: 1

    He stole hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of actual, physical Cisco hardware. Don't feel sorry for him--feel sorry for other software reversers who make no money from their wrongdoing but do it out of a sense of social justice and a desire for Robin Hood-like notoriety.

  37. Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by sudog · · Score: 1

    Repeat after me: endlessly copyable digital media is not the same as a physical, limited-available physical object like an SUV.

    Would you have the same problem if a device were made that you could aim at an SUV and which would make a complete and perfect copy of it at little or no cost to the owner of that SUV?

    Of course not. The SUV owner isn't deprived in the slightest.

    Now run along...

    1. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, because just because it can be physically duplicated for little to no cost doesn't mean it's free.

      Of course not. The SUV owner isn't deprived in the slightest.

      No, but the company who has to pay designers, engineers, assembly line workers, and so on, is. You're getting the fruits of somebody's labour for free, when they're not giving it away for free. That's theft.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    2. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by foidulus · · Score: 1

      Ummm....let me get this straight, you think that no IP goes into your SUV...... you are the biggest MORON I have ever seen on slashdot, or in the world for that matter. A ton of IP, sometimes stored on endlessly copyable digital media goes into the SUV, and guess what, YOU PAY FOR IT! So should you then be entitled just to pay for the materials of the SUV instead of paying for the designs etc, well guess what, I worked in a steel mill doing programming, there is IP in the steel even. So I want you to go and prove to me how different the IP on media is versus the IP on an SUV, I want you to go and steal an SUV, but leave about $5k less than what it's worth to the person you stole it, then go to court saying that you are entitled not to pay for IP. I want to see what happens. You obviously feel that you should not have to pay for it, actions speak louder than words.

    3. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by sudog · · Score: 1

      Riiiiight.

      What about photos of the car? Am I depriving the designers then? What about mental images of the car? How about then? Nobody is deprived if the design can be copied perfectly at no cost whatsoever to the original designers.

      Else, how can kit cars be sold?

    4. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1
      What about photos of the car? Am I depriving the designers then? What about mental images of the car? How about then? Nobody is deprived if the design can be copied perfectly at no cost whatsoever to the original designers.

      The designers are. If they spend 1 million dollars to design a new car, and sell that car for 20,000 dollars a piece, but you steal the plans, you've just stolen 1 million dollars worth of value.

      If the designers spend 1 million dollars on design, and give that design away, that's their choice.

      Else, how can kit cars be sold?

      Obviously, the PRICE that they're being SOLD AT is enough to cover COSTS TO MAKE THE KIT as well as perhaps a bit of PROFIT.

      Like that FA-18 Hornet going on ebay; 1 million for the parts, 8 million if you want it assembled.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
    5. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by sudog · · Score: 1

      So.. uh.. Lotus esprit kits, and all those other unauthorized kit cars out there with everything but the actual emblem of the vehicle types themselves? What about them? Are they infringing on the designers? Why aren't they being sued into the dirt? Because people want the service, parts, and quality of the original, that's why. If I make a copy and run off with it, I'm damn well not going to get any service or warranty with my copy, so...?

    6. Re:Why parent is a moron. (Was Re:...the cracker) by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 1

      Because there's also the concept of 'not worth my time to track down.'

      Besides, the analog in the computer world would be 'Well, Linux is a copy of UNIX, but doesn't claim to be UNIX, blah blah blah' which is one thing. Creating your own software designed to act like a different piece of software is one thing. Taking somebody else's software is another.

      --
      Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.