Slashdot Mirror


Own a Piece of An Apple-Based Supercomputer

Graff writes "Now that Apple has come out with the Xserve G5, Virginia Tech has been swapping out parts of their 'System X' supercomputer for the more compact 1U Xserves. MacMall is selling some of those System X component G5 systems with an approximate $200 savings and an extra 512 megs of RAM over a normal G5. You can read more about it at MacCentral."

27 of 296 comments (clear)

  1. Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Only 6 months of use out of these things and VT is tossing them out like yesterday's trash. Gee, thanks for doing this after delaying my order for 6 weeks back when the G5s were originally supposed to be shipping to the rest of us. Apparently you didn't need them that badly after all.

    --


    8==8 Bones 8==8
    1. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by Emil+Brink · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hardware that has seen use for six months in a super-computer, i.e. probably been run 24/7 and really stressed, sold for $200 below the price of new is considered to be priced as "trash"? Your trash must be worth its weight in gold, then. I think it sounds expensive, but then it's Apple hardware so I shouldn't be surprised. ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
    2. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 5, Insightful

      VT isn't the one selling these systems... Apple is. VT is tossing them back at Apple for shiny new Xserves. Apparently being the 3rd fastest computer in the world isn't good enough anymore.

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    3. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by Bones3D_mac · · Score: 1, Insightful

      And I suppose the fact that it was a huge PR move for Apple to have a mac-based supercomputer inside a well known college didn't have anything to do with that? Right...

      --


      8==8 Bones 8==8
    4. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Heat == stress i.e. electron migration. Resulting in ~2% less lifetime for 1 centigrade above room temperature. Even worse for HDDs. (for ball bearing ones, but yet not enough long-time info on the rather new liquid bearing drives.

      I'd prefer a computer from the average mouse pusher: power cycled 1x or 2x a day, few stress through heat, no extraordinary HDD activity, coveted by its owner. Enough power-on time to sort out manufacturing defects for all components except the HDD, too little of everything to wear the components out.

    5. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by assemblyline · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Virginia Tech wanted Xserves in the first place. Apple didn't reveal them until January. Look at the benefits. Smaller case, less heat generated, less power consumed, error corecting code memory; all things which would be extemely useful in a supercomputer like this. From what I have read, the upgrade will use 25% less power and take up a third less space. If I were Tech, I would throw the current G5s back too.

    6. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by arkanes · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Apple redirected G5s that were originially scheduled to fulfull pre-orders to VT, resulting in (at least) 1100 people, who'd placed preorders and been promised a ship date, being out of a G5 and having to wait till a second ship (which may very well have been 6 weeks, I dunno).

      It grates on people being told that they're less important than a PR move.

    7. Re:Some of us *should* be bitter about this... by tonydiesel · · Score: 2, Insightful

      $200 savings but as I understand it they also have an extra $512 of RAM... considering Apple's RAM pricing structure, this turns out to be like a $500-$600 savings...

  2. an extra 512 megs??? by John+Seminal · · Score: 0, Insightful
    You know what I HATE??? Those dang mail-in rebates. They say you get 512 megs for free. Uh-huh, after a $99 mail in rebate and $40 installation fee. What is so free now?

    Arggggh! Let me rant a little more. Lend me your ears. Why do people alow for this? Why do people buy stuff that has false advertising? There were times I recieved an advertising in the mail for some computer part at a great price, and I run to the store to find the price in the advertising is after mail in rebates. In this case, it was a router for $49 after a $100 mail in rebate.. But you would have to search the small legal print to find the $100 dollar rebate in the advertising.

    Why oh why do companies use mail in rebates? I HATE mail in rebates. I will not buy products that have mail in rebates. What is wrong with advertising the real price in BOLD, not the sale price, and listing the mail in rebates in smaller font under the real price?? Sometimes I think computer stores do things like this just to get people in the doors.

    --

    Rosco: "If brains were gunpowder, Enos couldn't blow his nose."

    1. Re:an extra 512 megs??? by philbert26 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Why oh why do companies use mail in rebates?

      So they can make money when people forget to send the form on time, or fill it in incorrectly.

      Several companies in the UK do the same for extended warranties. They say "pay lots of money and if your machine doesn't break, we'll refund it after five years". You typically get 30 days after the five years to get your money back, and most people will just forget.

  3. So, why did the sale happen so early? by Coutal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Why couldn't VT hold their horses?
    my bet is... they could.
    no one likes building any cluster (not to mention a supercomputer) out of desktops, esp. ones configured like desktops (gfx, no ecc, ...)
    but apple really wanted the PR of having the computer cluster, and perhaps to list the revenue in 4Q2003.
    so i can't blame them - looks like a fair deal.

    1. Re:So, why did the sale happen so early? by LennyDotCom · · Score: 3, Insightful

      apple really wanted the PR of having the computer cluster

      No VT needed the PR probably more then Apple now they get grant money out the wazoo

      --
      http://Lenny.com
    2. Re:So, why did the sale happen so early? by despik · · Score: 4, Insightful

      but apple really wanted the PR of having the computer cluster, and perhaps to list the revenue in 4Q2003. so i can't blame them - looks like a fair deal.

      You fool. Apple wanted the PR, so they forced the G5s down VT's collective throat. Yeah, right.

      Why couldn't VT hold their horses?

      Because they had a deadline to meet if they wanted to make that Top CPUs list.

      --
      "I seem to have mastered a certain amount of control over physical reality."
  4. You have truly no heart by blorg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Although, I agree that a bit of engraving would go some way towards supporting their value. Is there anything at all, beyond that 1 sentence on the website, for a purchaser to establish that they really do have one of the Virginia Tech machines?

  5. Never buy 1st version by iamanatom · · Score: 2, Insightful

    'Never buy the first version of anything' - even if it is $200 less than list price, has been well looked after, comes with an extra 512Mb and used to be part of a supercomputer. Rev2 or 3 is always a better purchase.

    --
    "This is crazy, you realise we could all go to jail for this?" - my manager, somewhere I used to work.
    1. Re:Never buy 1st version by iamanatom · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Ok, so the first version of modern computers won't be totally bad but the 2nd version will be much better than just the increase is speed or memory or other part of the spec. The manufacturing will have settled down a bit and it could be nothing more than things feeling a bit better fitted and well finished. Or it could be like the rev c TiBooks. They have a higher res monitor, faster memory and gigbit ethernet apart from the improvement in CPU speed and HD size you'd expect from something introduced a year later. OK, so if you'd needed one when they were first introduced you'd get the first version but if you could afford to hold off for a while you might want to. You'll get the added benefits to use for yourself and on the resale price when you sell it. This is why I said 'purchase' rather than just 'computer'. So long as something worthwhile hasn't been taken out by the time a line is discontinued the last version of a model is generally more desirable. Check out the prices of 'Graphite', 'Quicksilver' and 'Mirror Door' Powermac G4s.

      --
      "This is crazy, you realise we could all go to jail for this?" - my manager, somewhere I used to work.
  6. Re:Seems like no discount by gunnk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Maybe some folks buy Apples without the educational discount because they aren't eligible for it and figure taking a couple of hundred dollars in discounts for which they don't qualify would be stealing.

    Honesty/Intregrity can mean paying list price sometimes.

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  7. Re:Ironically... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    They (Apple) did _not_ get any discount for buying multiple machines.
    They only got the educational discount. Read the original annouchment on /.

  8. Re:Ironically... by gunnk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Probably the only actual record the big mac can claim is the shortest time to obsolescence. Not to downplay the achievement though...

    Well, it's the fastest supercomputer ever built with off-the-shelf components and the number three fastest machine on the planet -- and that's before the upgrade.

    They will probably make quite a decent profit out of this, despite the $200 discount. They must have got pretty decent discount from apple for both bulk buying and promotion. And any self respecting geek will want one of these over a stock G5

    As someone else pointed out, these are refurbished by Apple and then sold through MacMall. VT isn't selling them, but traded them back in to Apple for credit towards the Xserves.

    --
    Life is short: void the warranty.
  9. Definintely charging for celebrity by mactari · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Apple's online store is charging $2399 for refurbed dual G5s, and the student store's price for a new dual G5 is $2699, $100 less than the MacMall refurbs from Tech. You can even take $26 more off for getting rid of the internal mode, which the supercomputer refurbs don't have either.

    Even if you add the extra 512 megs of RAM from Apple's site (where prices aren't the best), these Va Tech refurbs are only $100 less than what a student would spend on the same box new. Not to mention these 2 GHz duallies are rated as "Buy only if you need it - Approaching the end of a cycle" on the Macrumors buyers' guide page.

    So not a deal at all if you're a student (though I have to think students at Va Tech could get the inside track on the boxes -- anyone know?) and not a great price for a refurb if you're Joe Schmoe. And not a box with great longevity, relatively speaking, either, if Macrumors has the lifecycle pegged.

    Wait for a processor speed bump unless you're dying to own a little bit of celebrity.

    --

    It's all 0s and 1s. Or it's not.
  10. Re:Radeon 9600s in the servers by clf8 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Ok, everyone keeps calling these servers and wondering why they've got firewire and a nice video card. Apple sells XServe's if you want a pure server. Typically, these machines would be used by some media professional (layout, design, audio, movies, animation) for which these things make complete sense. These aren't XServe's, these are PowerMacs and as such should be loaded to the gill.

    VT didn't buy XServe's to start because there was no G5 version. Now that there is, they are, which over the long run the cooling and power expenses should more than compensate for any money lost on the computer swap deal. Oh yeah, and they've still got the 3rd fastest supercomputer in the world.

  11. What are we? Idiots? by pico303 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    $200 off a 6 month old used computer? You've got to be joking, right? You get that in rebates on most brand new computers these days.

    This kind of shit is exactly why I have never bought from MacMall. They have the markup from hell. I'm surprised they can stay in business. The only thing I can figure is that the average Mac user is not computer saavy (i.e. not a Slashdot reader) and has no clue he's being overcharged 50-100%. Some Mac users out there explain to me why you frequent MacMall over the Apple Store or CompUSA?

    As an aside, I would love someone to do an in-depth study and research the logic behind mail-in rebates (or, if it's been done, point me to it). I know we all have our ideas, but what is the real reason an online company like Dell or MacMall would sell you a computer and then have you send in a mail-in rebate?

  12. Re:look at the specs... not for servers..... by NaugaHunter · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Umm.... the G5's that were being built for normal use had what VT needed. To order specially built G5's would have pushed back delivery while either special ones were built or the supposedly superfluous parts were removed from G5's rolling off the normal assembly line; either option would have also increased costs and reduce eventual value.

    Even if the new XServes weren't ready for another year, it's obvious that eventually these computers would be broken up and replaced. If they are full-functioning G5's even if they couldn't be traded in they have an instant computer lab. Your crippled ones would have been useless.

    (Of course, I'm also ignoring the details like whether the Airport, USB or Firewire are on the motherboard and idiotic to consider removing.)

    --
    R: That voice. Where have I heard that voice before? B: In about 365 other episodes. But I don't know who it is either.
  13. Re:Ironically... by BenBenBen · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Well, it's the fastest supercomputer ever built with off-the-shelf components and the number three fastest machine on the planet -- and that's before the upgrade.
    People really should qualify this before throwing it around all the time - it's like saying a cheetah is the fastest animal in the universe because we've never seen anything faster.

    How many intelligence agencies are there worldwide? How many list their mainframes in the 500 list? What was the last time we knew about the exciting things people like the NSA and GCHQ were doing with computers? World War II. Now take how far ahead of academic computing they were in 1945 and add 50 years worth of Moore's law, Cold War and funky Russian mathematics geniuses.

    I bet NSA has stuff that makes this look like a gameboy.
    --
    Before modding "troll", go look up the meaning of the words discussion, rhetorical and "devil's advocate".
    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  14. Re:Radeon 9600s in the servers by Hoser+McMoose · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There actually IS a way to do math on GPUs, take a look at what these people are doing. I don't know if there is any software yet that will run on Macs and OS X, I think most of it is targeting PCs running Linux, but at least in theory you can do some some pretty high performance math on GPUs.

    Of course, there are some downsides to this. First off, it only works on the latest and greatest generation of GPUs that are programable (the Radeon 9600 should qualify here). Second, GPUs only support single-precision floating point math, not the double-precision needed by a lot of complex computing. Third, GPUs are rather powerful vector processors, which are somewhat different than general purpose processors. This is not entirely a bad thing, the Earth Simulator is a giant vector processor as well, but some applications don't work as well on vector processors.

  15. Re:My question is:, MAC by stephentyrone · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Of course, for real-world code, the difference might not be nearly as large and in many situations the P4 or Opteron could easily be a lot faster.

    "real-world code" *is* multiply-adds, when we're talking about scientific computing (and why else would you need a 1,100-node cluster?)

  16. Re:Seems like no discount by -tji · · Score: 2, Insightful


    Maybe, but it seems like most people have a pretty flexible view of where the cutoff line is. For example, would you pay sales tax for inter-state purchases where it was not billed as part of the transaction? You are supposed to, but virtually noone does.

    Many people would consider paying for a product, but trying to get the best possible price, completely fine. Whether this means rebates, or any possible discount you can get.

    After all, it's just a company's arbitrary decision on who gets discounts for what. Why should that company's policy mean anything to people not involved with that company? As if a professor at a university, or an employee of the government (who also get Apple discounts) is more deserving of lower prices than Joe Average.

    This is also complicated by the fact that educational discounts are often used as a way to satisfy consumers while keeping corporate prices high. Do a google search for that with respect to Microsoft. They have educational pricing for Office, with no validation, which is aimed at keeping the price for Office sky high for those fat corporations, but still allowing home users to "get a great deal" on it. So, their plan is to encourage you to break their licensing agreement.

    When I bought my Powerbook, I instead found a local "gray market" dealer who has access to Apple hardware, but does not stick to their pricing policies. So, he sold it to me for $500 below the MSRP, well below the educational pricing. Where would that be on your moral compass?