Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Receives XML Patent

gsfprez writes "Well, i'm no patent lawyer, but if I'm reading this right, it seems that the basics of XML are being patented by Microsoft. If not the files themselves - at least what most of us would do with XML files. From the abstract: 'Systems, methods and data structures for encompassing scripts written in one or more scripting languages in a single file.' That smacks of what my config files do on my G5 for my G5, if you read it with a biased eye." We noted this was happening earlier, and now it's finally come to pass. While the patent does sound a bit dubious, a Microsoft spokesman was quick to deny that they'd be so bold as to patent XML itself.

30 of 441 comments (clear)

  1. Quick... by shrykk · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone go patent .txt files!

    --
    #define struct union /* Reduce memory usage */
    1. Re:Quick... by ScrewMaster · · Score: 4, Funny

      Better yet ... someone go patent the idea of a .DLL file. THAT'll throw 'em. Maybe we can cross-license .XML for .DLL, and avoid .XML hell.

      --
      The higher the technology, the sharper that two-edged sword.
  2. My eyes must be old.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I first read the headline as "Microsoft Receives XML Patent".... oh shit that was the headline.

    1. Re:My eyes must be old.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      step 1.

      Make Outrageous claim in the headline. Truth? This is the internet, you know, slandering others anonymously..

      step 2.

      Perhaps elaborate or reinforce outrageous claim. Remember, bias is your friend.

      step 3.

      Use some random pointless cliche. Profit, or some such nonsense..

    2. Re:My eyes must be old.. by cujo_1111 · · Score: 1, Funny

      More /. cliches that could apply here...

      - All your XML are belong to us?
      - In Soviet Russia, XML patents Microsoft?
      - I am XML, you insensitive clod?

      --
      If I point out that you are incorrect, making me a foe does not make you any more correct.
    3. Re:My eyes must be old.. by denks · · Score: 2, Funny
      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of XML patents I would like to be the first to welcome our

      patenting Microsoft overlords.

      XML is dying.

      Imagine what would happen if SCO found some of their IP in XML.

      IANAL but I cant see how they can do this.

      click here [goatse] to view the patent.

      --

      I am Monkey, the Great Sage, equal of heaven!
  3. bait and switch by conteXXt · · Score: 5, Funny

    and they sneak a patent though while we all look for the source code.

    --
    The truth about Led Zep should never be told on /. (Karma suicide ensues)
  4. What next? by Carnildo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Gee. Next thing you know, someone'll patent the "A method for gas exchange by alternate inductions of overpressure and underpressure", aka "breathing".

    --
    "They redundantly repeated themselves over and over again incessantly without end ad infinitum" -- ibid.
    1. Re:What next? by Mr.+Piddle · · Score: 1, Funny


      Even better would be to patent "breathing in a fart" and then go on to sue all customers of Mexican restaraunts and all the pro football fans in the country.

      --
      Vote in November. You won't regret it.
    2. Re:What next? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I claim prior fart.

  5. Sue this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    <FRUIT>
    <ITEM>
    <FRUIT NAME>Banana</FRUIT NAME>
    <FRUIT DESCRIPTION>Bananas are yellow, and research
    has indicated that they are the favorite food of
    monkeys.</FRUIT DESCRIPTION>
    <FRUIT IMGSRC>012199-banana.jpg</FRUIT IMGSRC>
    </ITEM>
    <ITEM>
    <FRUIT NAME>Orange</FRUIT NAME>
    <FRUIT DESCRIPTION>Oranges grow on trees, and are the
    main constituent of orange juice.</FRUIT DESCRIPTION>
    <FRUIT IMGSRC>012199-orange.jpg</FRUIT IMGSRC>
    </ITEM>
    <ITEM>
    <FRUIT NAME>Strawberry</FRUIT NAME>
    <FRUIT DESCRIPTION>Strawberries are a popular fruit
    in the Summer months.</FRUIT DESCRIPTION>
    <FRUIT IMGSRC>012199-strawberry.JPG</FRUIT IMGSRC>
    </ITEM>
    <ITEM>
    <FRUIT NAME>Tomato</FRUIT NAME>
    <FRUIT DESCRIPTION>Tomatoes are a vital constituent
    of pizzas and other convenience foods.</FRUIT DESCRIPTION>
    <FRUIT IMGSRC>012199-tomato.jpg</FRUIT IMGSRC>
    </ITEM>
    </FRUIT>

    1. Re:Sue this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Is it a bird?

      Is it a plane?

      No, it's Captain Nitpick!!!

  6. Microsoft to Patent 1s, 0s by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    In what CEO Bill Gates called "an unfortunate but necessary step to protect our intellectual property from theft and exploitation by competitors," the Microsoft Corporation patented the numbers one and zero Monday.

    With the patent, Microsoft's rivals are prohibited from manufacturing or selling products containing zeroes and ones--the mathematical building blocks of all computer languages and programs--unless a royalty fee of 10 cents per digit used is paid to the software giant.

    "Microsoft has been using the binary system of ones and zeroes ever since its inception in 1975," Gates told reporters. "For years, in the interest of the overall health of the computer industry, we permitted the free and unfettered use of our proprietary numeric systems. However, changing marketplace conditions and the increasingly predatory practices of certain competitors now leave us with no choice but to seek compensation for the use of our numerals."

    http://www.rfcafe.com/miscellany/humor/1n0_paten t. htm

  7. And look how modest they are by vicparedes · · Score: 5, Funny
    a Microsoft spokesman was quick to deny that they'd be so bold as to patent XML itself
    I feel much better now.
  8. Piano Teachers Unite! by joelparker · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can piano teachers please patent C# asap?

  9. Re:Microsoft has never used a patent offensively by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But...but... its MICROSOFT. And this... this is SLASHDOT.

  10. Quick.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone patent the < symbol. Then Microsoft's patent will be useless.

  11. unimaginable consequences by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    Next thing you know, someone'll patent the "A method for gas exchange by alternate inductions of overpressure and underpressure", aka "breathing".

    By your definition, it sounds as though the development and innovations that would make farting possible would be impeded, since there would be prior art.

  12. Re:What the Patent Is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    so that patent is putting something inside of xml and making use of it.

    wow *puts hands on face in suprise)

  13. Re:Business plan: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Apparently the ??? is: Create software that 95% of the computer users in the world make use of everyday.

  14. next please? by dakan · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm wondering what microsoft is going to patent next? I've got a few ideas though:
    * Waking up in the morning
    * Brushing my teeth (or has someone already got that one?)
    * The way I eat my cereal in the morning
    (I've got more but I think I've got my idea across)

    --
    -This sig has been discontinued after a sudden realization.
  15. Re:not a patent of XML by morelife · · Score: 4, Funny

    the text of the /. headline is a bit misleading.

    W H A T W A S T H A T ? ? ?

  16. In USSR... by Aardpig · · Score: 4, Funny

    <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//Soviet//Russia" "Very-Strict.dtd">
    <patent owner="Microsoft">
    You
    </patent >

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  17. Re:tomato==vegatable, by law by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    That'll be good news to all those vegetarians that thought it was a breed of cow.

  18. Re:Maybe so, still trivial... by kfg · · Score: 3, Funny

    No, no, no. You don't get it at all, do you?

    This patent only covers putting both of your examples in the same document.

    Totally different and nonobvious dude.

    KFG

  19. Re:A Quick Cluestick for the Clueless. by thebatlab · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Either this is a non-story, or it is woefully misdirected."

    This is slashdot so I'll go with the woefully misdirected one.

  20. hmmmm.......Re:not a patent of XML by Kruid · · Score: 3, Funny
    embedding multiple scripts in a single XML file and ways for extracting and executing them

    Doesn't everyone else call this a virus?

    -k

    --
    Your mind moves quicker than a nun's first curry. - A. Rimmer
  21. Re:Microsoft has never used a patent offensively by Kirth · · Score: 2, Funny

    Yes, terribly funny.

    50 years of bollocks, frivolous lawsuits, waste of taxpayers money, strengthening of monopolies. When will they finally ditch that piece of trash of a law? Oh, wait? Its patents, not war on drugs?
    --

    --
    "The more prohibitions there are, The poorer the people will be" -- Lao Tse
  22. Maybe... by Ape_the_Dog · · Score: 1, Funny

    they think this will stop people from writing XML virusses in the future.

    Or maybe it's just part of their business plan. You know...

    1. Patent XML files
    2. ???
    3. Profit!

  23. Re:Maybe so, still trivial... by kjd · · Score: 2, Funny

    No, no, this is entirely different. Microsoft is using <code> tags.