Slashdot Mirror


Navy Jet eBayed - Some Assembly Required?

madmancarman writes "The world's only F/A-18 Hornet in private ownership, formerly a Navy Blue Angel Jet, is for sale on eBay. The initial asking price? $1 million unassembled, or $9 million assembled and certified airworthy 'with your choice of paint' - more info is available via a Yahoo News story. I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it? The same person selling the F/A-18 is also selling a 1950's T-33, and claims they'll soon be auctioning off an F-16 and a Mig-29 as well. Build your own air force for fun and profit!"

79 of 704 comments (clear)

  1. Assembly AND Military Experience Required by andyrut · · Score: 5, Informative

    While owning a Blue Angel would be awesome, it's unlikely a civilian would actually get any flight time in such a vehicle. To fly it, you'd need a Letter of Authorization because there's no FAA type certification for this aircraft - and unless you're an ex-military pilot, you've basically got no chance of getting an LOA.

    Even if you were to get an LOA, to fly it you'd have to get permission from the FAA to put it in the air every time you take off. So add your own private island to the total cost if you actually want to fly it without hassle.

    So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament.

    1. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can acquire a private island for less than $9 million. A fair bit less.

    2. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well...there ARE plenty of ex-military pilots out there. How many have $9 million is beyond me.

      I wonder what the legalities of such are. The government imposes rules on exporting software and supercomputers to other nations. Can you really buy a current military plane? Can someone buy it without a background check? Kinda scary actually...

      --

      "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    3. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All that aside, how much would it cost, in terms of fuel and maintenance, to get it in the air?

      I asked someone at an airshow this question, and they said a "mission" cost between $100k (just to take off and land) to $1m (to do a lot more than take off and land).

      It might be substantially more expensive than that for a private person who doesn't have the huge infrastructure needed to maintain it.

      I have to agree with the other poster on this thread - Larry Ellison is likely to be a seller. Or a buyer. He's one of the few people in the world who could actually afford to run it on a regular basis.

      Bob Lutz is another possibility, but I don't know if he's rich enough.

      D

    4. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've known a couple of folks that own a Saab Draken and Mig-15's and it turns out civilians can own and fly such vehicles. You do need LOA's, and there are other restrictions such as not being able to exceed the sound barrier (at least in US airspace).

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    5. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by EverlastGobstopp · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we can't get a LOA to fly it, can we drive it on the roads? The engines would certainly discourage tailgating

    6. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Uhmmm...no. It's classified "experimental" and could in fact be flown by a private individual. This is the same thing that is done with the old warbirds, Mig 21's and bombers that private parties fly. More info can be found here: http://www.utility-aircraft.com/catalog/certificat e/index.htm

      You do need an actual special reason for flying the plane, but aside from that it is quite possible for a private party to own and fly a military jet.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    7. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AJWM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On the other hand, if you buy it unassembled, you could assemble it yourself and have it qualified as an experimental aircraft, plus save $8million. You'd still have to follow the rules for experimental aircraft, but that's true of any homebuilt.

      --
      -- Alastair
    8. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by rogerwong · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's currently impossible to get a Letter of Authorization (LOA) from the FAA, because the FAA have phased out LOAs.

      Instead, you now get certified, by an authorized instructor, for certain classes of experimental aircraft. The DC-F18 is part of Group IX, along with the F-15 and Mig 29.

      See this FAA document for more details:
      http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/news/n_8700-24.pdf

    9. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure a bomb rack would hurt if you dropped it on someone's head.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    10. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by flewp · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they sent out an F117 you'd be lucky. It has no air to air capabilities.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    11. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament.

      I think my next-door neighbor is hiding WMD (or so my intelligence indicates) so this fighter might be just the thing for this imminent threat.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    12. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by silconous · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Jet holds 10800 lbs of JP5 without External fuel tanks.

      I know I used to work on them in the Avionics shop VMFA-232

    13. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, now Concorde's gone the US govt. will miraculously repeal that particular edict just in time for Boeing to introduce a supersonic airliner.

      Betcha.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    14. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by The+Dobber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cept of course if they take you out while its sitting up on cinder block in the backyard.

    15. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Funny
      You do need an actual special reason for flying the plane
      Does strafing the neighbours' backyard count as a 'reason'?

      But seriously, what would such a special reason be? Airshows?
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    16. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by M1FCJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you are flying, it's the weight that counts.

    17. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can think of one, but I reckon he got his flight status revoked in 1972 due to being AWOL.

    18. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think his current millitary rank might override that.

    19. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats what they tought us in school (I was an Aero Eng major a lifetime ago). Interestingly, IIRC if you go really, really fast (hypersonic, > Mach 5) the shock wave becomes so narrow and close to the plane that sonic booms are no longer a problem. Its only around the low Mach numbers that you get these really wide shock waves that still have a lot of strength when they hit the ground.

    20. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by headGasket · · Score: 4, Informative

      WHAT??!?! According to this article flying a MiG21 costs about 500 gallons of jet fuel for 15 minutes. Double that for a F18 your at 4000 gallons an hour; about 10 000$ an hour. You can do a lot more than take off and land in an hour.

      --
      6E8C 8721 B3D9 5269 5A9B 1122 00C3 C03D 99A7 1CFC
    21. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by dj51d · · Score: 4, Informative

      Typically such an aircraft would be registered Experimental/Exhibition and the allowed uses are for exhibition(airshows) and proficiency flights. Any flight not for an airshow is considered a proficiency flight.

    22. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've watched too much Discovery Wings. The F117A was given an "F" designation despite no air-to-air capability was to mollify the hot-shot fighter jocks who were chosen to fly the plane.

    23. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Informative

      A sonic boom is only a fixed boom for an individual observer, not a one time crack as the plane exceeds the speed of sound. Sonic booms are caused by shockwaves following along after the moving object. You'll only hear it once (unless you outrun the object and then wait for it to go by again), but it's a sustained shockwave for as long as the plane is flying fast enough.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    24. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've also heard that the F117 could be fitted for air-to-air capability but sidewinders seems unlikely. Sidewinders have an IR sensor on the nose to seek the hot tail exhaust of enemy jets and would need to be mounted outside of the internal bomb bays to be effective. If the sidewinders are mounted outside, the low radar profile of the F117A would be compromised and the jet would lose its best asset. Mounting the sidewinder in the internal bay would preserve the low radar profile while the sidewinders are in the compartment but the would also lose its ability to carry ground ordnance. Deploying the sidewinders from the internal bays would also adversely affect the aerodynamics of the F117A and create a higher radar profile, neither of which is desirable for a relatively slow jet that will be engaging in air-to-air combat.
      Theoretically, sidewinders can be mounted on this special purpose jet, but in doing so, the F117A loses its strengths and is forced into a role for which it is less suitable.

    25. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative
      Btw, the most common speed unit is knots, not mph or km/h and knots is a naval unit measured by a number of knots on a rope that's trailing the ship in a given time period.

      I was going to call bullshit, because it was always my understanding that a knot == 1.15mph (something to do with the distance of a nautical mile at the equator as I recalled), but it turns out that you are correct. According to this website:

      The term knot or nautical mile, is used world-wide to denote one's speed through the water. Today, we measure knots with electronic devices, but 200 years ago, such devices were unknown. Ingenious mariners devised a speed-measuring device both easy to use and reliable, the "log line."

      From this method, we get the term "knot." The log line was a length of twine marked at 47.33 foot intervals by colored knots. At one end a log chip was fastened; it was shaped like the sector of a circle and weighted at the rounded end with lead. When thrown over the stern, it would float pointing upward and would remain relatively stationary. The log line was allowed to run free over the side for 28 seconds and then hauled on board.

      Knots which had passed over the side were counted. In this way, the ship's speed was measured.

      Google also says that a knot = 1.15077945 mph or 1.85200 kph.

      So I stand corrected :) Glad I researched that before opening my big mouth. Learn something new every day...

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    26. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by DoctorPepper · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's absolutely right. In military aircraft, especially Navy aircraft, everything is measured in pounds. When I was in the Navy, I worked on the F-14A Tomcat. That plane would hold 16,400 lbs of fuel without the drop tanks, over 20,000 with drop tanks. Add that to the dry weight of over 48,000 lbs, and you've got one HEAVY airplane!

      I've seen them take the catapult stroke at over 72,000 lbs.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
  2. Ellison? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmmmm. This sounds like the owner might have been Larry Ellison. There have been a number of Mig-29's available in private hands over the years as well as a couple of F-104 Starfighters. I don't know if Larry owned an F-18, or an F-16 but I talked to him at a Java conference (at least I'm pretty sure it was Ellison) years ago and he expressed an interest in obtaining fighter jets like the Mig-29. Someone told me that he recently married, so perhaps his wife would rather he not go "jetting off" and would like him to calm his lifestyle a bit?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Ellison? by the+melon · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is actually a doctor who owns it. I saw a program on Discovery Wings a year or two ago that had him and the plane in it. They gave his name but I cannot remember what it was.

      He said the only real restriction that was on the plane was one that is on all civilian aircraft: No supersonic flight over US airspace.

  3. Two weks from now... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Positive Feedback: A+++++++++++++!!!! Bomb racks work great! Thanks!!!!!11

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  4. Government oversight? by warlockgs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting. Are there any sort of government oversights as to how these can be sold and to whom? I would hate for some wack-job with money to get a hold of one of these, get some armament via the black market, and use it to do something regrettable.

    1. Re:Government oversight? by sfjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would hate for some wack-job with money to get a hold of one of these, ...

      Too late - he's already got 'em. And I don't think you should be calling the President of the USA a "wack-job".

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
  5. Yeah. eBay. by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most things on eBay seem to go for damn-near retail price, so I'm guessing that a MiG-29 would get bid through the roof and have a value near to that of its Western counterparts (despite its less-than competitive combat avionics). You could probably get the MiG cheaper by just going to Russia to buy it. Like the price of a Hummer H2 (~$50K), I'm guessing. Some underpaid Russian general or mobster would probably jump at the chance.

    --
    blog |
  6. Yeah, right... by kemapa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll park it right in between the Bentley and the "In your dreams..."

  7. Flight Hours on Airframe by DaRat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    3700 odd flight hours, many of Blue Angels type maneuvers. Probably some significant stress and wear on that airframe due to the type of flying. There probably was a good reason that aircraft was retired.

    Also, the article should have read "F16 Fighting Falcon" for one of the upcoming aircraft, not "F16 Hornet"

    1. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most commercial planes have a 20,000 operating hour overhaul schedule.

      When was the last time your Delta pilot did a barrel roll?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by HardCase · · Score: 5, Informative
      3700 odd flight hours, many of Blue Angels type maneuvers. Probably some significant stress and wear on that airframe due to the type of flying. There probably was a good reason that aircraft was retired.


      Not at all - the maintenance schedule on military aviation is extraordinarily rigorous, because of the type of flying that is done and because much of the equipment (for its time) is cutting edge, at least mechanically speaking.


      The maneuvers that the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds do are the same maneuvers that all of the pilots of those aircraft perform. It's just that the demonstration teams perform them as a group. My old naval aviation buddies tell me that the Blue Angels' jets actually get easier use than the regular jets. They certainly don't have to make any arrested landings or catapault takeoffs!


      -h-

  8. I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it? by baywulf · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it?"

    I would guess it would cost about 5 years in camp X-ray.

  9. Dorn? Is that you? by memoryhole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to IMDB, Michael Dorn owns (or used to) a T-33 and an F-86, among others. I wonder if it's him. Imdb link

  10. Pepsi will buy it... by Deathlizard · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...So they can give it to the guy that turned in all the pepsi points for the Harrier Jet.

    Of course a Hornet is not quite a Harrier, but I dont think the guy will care.

  11. Kick Ass by barenaked · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they include a free tank of gas with the purchase....

  12. Correction... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...claims they'll soon be auctioning off an F-16 Hornet..."

    That would be F-16 Fighting Falcon. Of course, this is Slashdot and it wouldn't surprise me if they mistakenly called it an F-16 Elbow.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  13. Sounds like fun by StuWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll buy it... It's time the war against the RIAA, SCO, and Microsoft became more than just a metaphor! Warn Redmond air traffic control to expect me soon...

    --
    "If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments." Earl Wilson
  14. If you have the cash...buy it assembled by SquierStrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being a aviation mechanic for the Marine Corps, I'm going to tell you that you want hte thing flight worthy...the assembly isn't something you would want to tackle yourself. In short: it's a bitch.

    And to the person doubting you could get an LOA for it...that's crap. The question is would you want to fly it?

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:If you have the cash...buy it assembled by paganizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm.
      I'm an ex-navy fire control & Avionics tech for this bird (lot 12 being the last one I worked on).
      What say we see who buys it and offer ourselves as ground crew? I've got a friend who's a BB stacker, just need a power guy...
      Assuming, of course, that it has the AN/APG-65 radar/avionics package still onboard; thats what I can't see the Navy willing to let fall into private hands, but I also can't see the bird flying without it, it's fairly integrated.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:If you have the cash...buy it assembled by paganizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh-huh.
      I think we need to stick with Navy & Navy Security (Marines) on this one.
      BB Stacker on the F/A-18 would be a ordnance specialist, someone who does storage, testing & mounting; I understand the USAF uses 3 or 4 separate people for the job; we never had that luxury.

      So the Proper mix would be:
      1 AQ/AT (for electronics, weapons control, radar)
      1 BB Stacker (AO)
      1 AE (Electrical)
      1 Hydraulics (can't remember the rate or MOS)
      1 Airframe Mech (probably not neccesary unless you are going to be buying that $4mil Brazilian Aircraft Carrier thats for sale, also).
      1 Power Plant monkey to keep the engines running.

      So, say 6 guys, minimum (I've been on a detached team that did it with 5, but it was only for one flight). I would want to have a experienced Fleet plane captain available to do the stuff we don't have a specialist for.

      and they would only need to be A&P certified if it was all done legally; if we are just doing this for a RIAA strike, we just need it to work.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  15. Lawn Ornament by EverlastGobstopp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament." I would love to have a F/A-18 sitting out on my lawn. In the fall I could use the afterburners to clear all the leaves from my yard. In the winter they could melt the snow on my driveway. I haven't thought of a use for spring and summer yet...

    1. Re:Lawn Ornament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I haven't thought of a use for spring and summer yet...

      Barbeques!

  16. And the top bidder is... by iblink · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone named fashionpillows. Go figure.

    1. Re:And the top bidder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      His prior winning bids include a Porsche 911 for $14K, a copy of Windows Business Server, and a MCSE certification kit. I guess MCSE really does pay off after all...

  17. Odd... by barryfandango · · Score: 5, Funny

    Listed in category: Consumer Electronics > Radios: CB, Ham & Shortwave > Ham Radio > Accessories > Antennas

    For a million bucks this better get good reception.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  18. DHS Message of the Day: by jafac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember; eBay supports Terrorism.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  19. How are they serious? by lostchicken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at the minimun bid of $1 mil, that means that there have, so far, been 7 people willing to fork over $1,000,000 for something. Now, looking at the feedback for these people, I can't possibly see how some of them could pay for this. wtmahan has bought repair manuals for a 1995 Nissan Protege. Anybody who drives one of those, and wants to fix it him/herself probably cannot afford an F/A-18. The current high bidder has bought a bunch of shirts and a $15,000 Porche, not cheap, but not a car for a person who can spend $1mil on an airplane kit.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:How are they serious? by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

      They might be looking at this as a business investment - can you imagine the commercial possibilites for supersonic cropdusting? You don't make much on each field, but the volume...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  20. Re:And they wonder why... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm calling it an investment. I figure when the *IAA sees my hard drive it'll be cheaper to have a kitted up fighter jet to deal with the problem than it would be to pay what they ask.

  21. Dangerous toys by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know (or knew) a rancher who rebuilt a Mustang. He used to fly it over his cattle drives on occasion to keep an eye on things. One day the cowboys saw him fly it straight into the side of a hill. Not only was he rendered into many tiny pieces, but an irreplacable piece of American aviation history was lost forever.

    Men have this fascination with warbirds - both prop and jet. The problem is that these things were designed - especially the old WWII birds - to fly just this side of stable. Airspeed, altitude, and maneuverability were prioritized over forgiveness. Even well-maintained aircraft flown by pilots with many hours all too often augered in. That was the price the military knew they would have to pay to get the job at hand done.

    Now we see weekend amateurs with too much money flying these things, when they should be flying Cessnas.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Dangerous toys by delcielo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truth is that many of the kids who flew these in practice (especially the old warbirds like your mustang) had fewer hours than a lot of current pilots.

      It's all about the training and discipline. Getting good education and training, and then having the self discipline to follow those things as well as the normal "rules" of aviation. In other words, just because you have a mustang and know how to fly it, that doesn't make it safe to do low-level passes with your attention diverted to things on the ground. That was true when the airplane was flown in combat, too.

      The area that most new warbird owners seem to get into trouble on is fuel exhaustion. None of these birds really have large stores of fuel unless they have their external tanks with them. Kind of gets back to the discipline thing. You would want to keep in mind that unless you were an airshow pilot, the airplane just wouldn't be very useful.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  22. I get it! by LeoDV · · Score: 4, Funny

    You buy it to go with this!

    Accessorize baby, accessorize!

  23. "I'll make it worth your while..." by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny
    You just made a serious mistake by not posting anonymously when you identified your skillset, my friend. If your friends are anything like mine, I can just imagine what's filling your inbox right now:

    You, know, I wasn't thinking of bidding on it until I saw your post. But I thought about it and maybe we can do the usual tech support thing. You know: you swing by and help me put it together. I'll provide the pizza and beer.

    So, are you busy next weekend or not?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  24. then again... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Funny

    it could possibly cost LESS for a private citizen.

    I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:then again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But were you able to fund a place like A51 with the $5,990 left over?

    2. Re:then again... by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

      Well, ok, but with a toilet seat YOU supply the fuel.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:then again... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      it could possibly cost LESS for a private citizen. I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

      Can we let the $500 hammer, $10,000 coffee maker, and the $6K toilet seat myths go now? If you want to understand the REAL scam behind this stuff, this is a good overview of exactly how the money gets wasted. For those who don't follow links, here's the explaination of "overpriced" parts:

      So the total cost of the project is something like $22.5 Billion (over 5 or 10 years)....that $250 toilet seat or hammer you have heard about... The way they calculate that is to divide the entire cost of the project (including all the fixed costs and so on) over every part or tool on the entire project. And what still hasn't been mentioned is that in many "above board" projects, they had to pad the budgets enough to cover all the black-projects costs. So really a lot of the costs were for part of another program! This would be about as accurate as dividing your total income, by how many times you wipe your butt per year, and figuring that each flush costs you $136. In other words -- it never existed"
      So the "pays for Area 51" comments are probably accurate, but anyone who tries to pay their income taxes by dragging a Mr. Coffee and a used toilet seat into the IRS office and asking for two hammers in change is an idiot.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:then again... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, ok, but with a toilet seat YOU supply the fuel.

      Of course in Soviet Russia....actually no, I'm not going to go there.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:then again... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Funny
      So the "pays for Area 51" comments are probably accurate, but anyone who tries to pay their income taxes by dragging a Mr. Coffee and a used toilet seat into the IRS office and asking for two hammers in change is an idiot.

      Well, that explains the looks I got.

  25. What you're really buying by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative

    is tihs. Not quite flyable condition...;)

    Yes, it can be put back together. But no, it's not in 'fly-away' condition.

    There are several ex-military jets in private hands. F-4's, F-86's, etc. And you can just return it to weapons capable status. *All* of the fire control circuitry will have been removed. And without that, a missile won't launch in anything other than a randowm direction, if at all.

    Given the restrictions on actually flying ex-military aircraft, it would be easier for a purported terrorist to drop a case of TNT out the door of a Cessna.

  26. What I wanna know.. by pedro · · Score: 4, Funny

    is, as an auto tinkerer that's been burned on this issue numerous times..
    What's a GASKET SET for this puppy go for??
    You'll need one in order to assemble it, yes?
    I'm betting *well* in excess of $1E6.
    8-P

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
  27. Right next to the Camaro... by christopher240240 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone know if standard concrete blocks will hold this puppy up?

  28. 9 million seems expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After the breakup of the Soviet bloc you could pick up migs for salvage or scrap from abandoned bases in Eastern Europe and East Germany. These went for thousands or mere hundreds of dollars rather than millions, and many were fully working units. Most were bought up for scap and stripped down for titanium and other resources. Many however just 'disappeared'.

    Look at some figures for the armaments in East Europe pre 1989, and then see if you can find any stories which account for what happened to all that military gear. You may be slightly worried.

  29. weapons usage by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure how easy it'd be to use this demilitarized, declassified F/A-18 for weapons use. The aircraft in its current state has kamikaze potential like any other, but employment of any actual modern air platform weapons would be almost impossible. No weapons fire-control software, possibly no radar, no weapons pylons (required to handle the complex mechanical and electrical linkages with weaponry, subject to great stress).

    It might be possible to jury-rig some sort of home-made pylon (at great expense) for carrying dumb bombs (simple ones that do not require any type of software control, yes even "dumb" bombs have a small amount of computerized control), but then again you could do that with any aircraft. Any aircraft can be used to drop something (crop dusters, 172's, MD-500's etc.).

    Of course where the F/A-18 fundamentally differs from civilian aircraft is its performance (any civilian sport aircraft could out-turn it though), but even that is of scattered use. Maneuvering performance is only useful in air to air combat, and it would be impractical for this aircraft to be converted for usage with air to air weaponry by yourself, unless you have connections with very skilled weaponry engineers and a lot of time and money. Then again, if you have those connections and funds, you could probably buy a real military aircraft from Russia and not need this F/A-18 in the first place.

    Now its performance would of course increase its kamikaze potential, but due to its size, this aircraft would probably not be much more effective in that respect than a regional or business jet. And there are plenty of those around already.

  30. MIGs by tiny69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    After the wall fell, one of the airplane magazines had an article on one of the older MIGs (don't remember which model). At the time, you could pick them up for fairly cheap (well, cheap for being a jet). Since getting spare parts was some what difficult if even possible, the magazine recommended that if you REALLY wanted a MIG, buy two just so that you have spare parts.

    Another thing that I remember from the article, the jet on that MIG had a really slow spool up time. This meant that when you pushed the throttle to full, it would take the engine a while before it produced full power. This becomes a problem if you have to do a missed approached or abort a landing. This meant that when you landed that MIG, you would push the controls to full throttle before the wheels touched down, just in case. This is the same thing that planes do when landing on a carrier. But it seemed strange to do for a ground based runway.

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  31. Wait, our choice of paint? by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does that mean that I can finally have a flying Goatse?

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
  32. I wonder... by Badmovies · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..if this person knows something. They are suddenly selling a number of jet aircraft and at rock bottom prices. I'd better go and check if Martha Stewart sold her jets today. Might be time to get rid of the Veritech.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  33. Selling lots of stuff by Bobulusman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seller has a great deal of pricey stuff on Ebay. Top three, pricewise, are:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? Vi ewItem&item=2460961703&category=26442
    Some sort of dirigible, $10M

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=4671&item=3077350284
    2 million feet of Corning fiber optic cable, $4.4M

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=4672&item=3078834871
    Warehouse, $1.1M

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  34. Yep... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are several ex-military jets in private hands. F-4's, F-86's, etc. And you can just return it to weapons capable status. *All* of the fire control circuitry will have been removed. And without that, a missile won't launch in anything other than a randowm direction, if at all.

    Given the restrictions on actually flying ex-military aircraft, it would be easier for a purported terrorist to drop a case of TNT out the door of a Cessna.


    ...for one, pick your target. Air-to-air combat? Riiight. Even if you got one fully locked and loaded with the latest the US has to offer, a squadron of trained combat pilots would pick you out of the sky in no time flat.

    I guess you could take out a civilian airliner or two before they manage to take you out of the sky, but hell. Despite the increased security, I'm sure there are easier ways for that still, particularly since you can sabotage landings/take-offs.

    So it's basicly a bomber. What do you need? Speed? Nah. If you can reach the center of whatever no-fly zone before you can be shut down, that's good enough and they're not that big unless your target is a remote military base. Range? Nah. Just take off from the nearest feasible runway.

    Payload? Yeah, I guess. But then you're better off renting a transport plane anyway. And since the plane is toast anyway, either fly it in or lock/program the autopilot and parachute out. No guidance/launch system necessary, just the navigation in any basic plane.

    Basicly, this is a combat plane built to fight a war. Firepower to shoot down hostiles, range to reach enemy targets, hit fortified installations and moving targets, and return to base safely. Very little of that applies to a terrorist.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  35. Current highest bidder... by mrmag00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to wonder what this fellow is into that is the current high bidder.

    According to his feedback he purchased a 19" roulette wheel, later 2 microsoft t-shirts, a microsoft training guide, then microsoft small business server, and finally a 1979 Porche. He's now bidding on a 1-million dollar aircraft.

    It just makes me wonder what this fellow is up to... and if I should be doing it too!

  36. Current high bidder by phorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's neat to see whom actually bids on these things. Checking out the comments on the high bidder:

    Perfect Transaction, Fast payment, True Gentleman, Please enjoy your PORSCHEAAA+

    and another less happy:
    only 1 bid & insisted that I sell him a MichaelJordan/ XP Bus Server SW for 9.99
    $gt; A winning bid is a winning bid; my friend! Period! ! ! Now ship my product!!!


    Quite amusing... these people live in a different world than I. Enjoy your PORSCHEAAA+ indeed

  37. Re: knots by SEAL · · Score: 4, Informative

    knots is a naval unit measured by a number of knots on a rope that's trailing the ship in a given time period.

    Where did you hear that?

    A knot is a nautical mile per hour. A nautical mile is one minute of latitude (1/60th of a degree of the Earth's circumference -- 6076 feet, versus 5280 feet for an English mile).

  38. think it 's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I knew the rohntowers.com sounded familiar... The guy (Micheal Landa) has an alleged checkered past: http://www.bishoptower.com/landa/