Slashdot Mirror


Navy Jet eBayed - Some Assembly Required?

madmancarman writes "The world's only F/A-18 Hornet in private ownership, formerly a Navy Blue Angel Jet, is for sale on eBay. The initial asking price? $1 million unassembled, or $9 million assembled and certified airworthy 'with your choice of paint' - more info is available via a Yahoo News story. I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it? The same person selling the F/A-18 is also selling a 1950's T-33, and claims they'll soon be auctioning off an F-16 and a Mig-29 as well. Build your own air force for fun and profit!"

160 of 704 comments (clear)

  1. Assembly AND Military Experience Required by andyrut · · Score: 5, Informative

    While owning a Blue Angel would be awesome, it's unlikely a civilian would actually get any flight time in such a vehicle. To fly it, you'd need a Letter of Authorization because there's no FAA type certification for this aircraft - and unless you're an ex-military pilot, you've basically got no chance of getting an LOA.

    Even if you were to get an LOA, to fly it you'd have to get permission from the FAA to put it in the air every time you take off. So add your own private island to the total cost if you actually want to fly it without hassle.

    So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament.

    1. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by B3ryllium · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You can acquire a private island for less than $9 million. A fair bit less.

    2. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by chia_monkey · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well...there ARE plenty of ex-military pilots out there. How many have $9 million is beyond me.

      I wonder what the legalities of such are. The government imposes rules on exporting software and supercomputers to other nations. Can you really buy a current military plane? Can someone buy it without a background check? Kinda scary actually...

      --

      "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
    3. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are tons of ex-military guys out there who could fly this and afford it. Bob Lutz has a friggin MiG.

      An ex-Blue Angel told CNN that their aircraft are stripped of weapons systems before they even get them, so to answer the story poster's question: It would cost the same to arm it as it would a Cessna or anything else.

    4. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by daviddennis · · Score: 4, Interesting

      All that aside, how much would it cost, in terms of fuel and maintenance, to get it in the air?

      I asked someone at an airshow this question, and they said a "mission" cost between $100k (just to take off and land) to $1m (to do a lot more than take off and land).

      It might be substantially more expensive than that for a private person who doesn't have the huge infrastructure needed to maintain it.

      I have to agree with the other poster on this thread - Larry Ellison is likely to be a seller. Or a buyer. He's one of the few people in the world who could actually afford to run it on a regular basis.

      Bob Lutz is another possibility, but I don't know if he's rich enough.

      D

    5. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by BWJones · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've known a couple of folks that own a Saab Draken and Mig-15's and it turns out civilians can own and fly such vehicles. You do need LOA's, and there are other restrictions such as not being able to exceed the sound barrier (at least in US airspace).

      --
      Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    6. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by EverlastGobstopp · · Score: 5, Funny

      If we can't get a LOA to fly it, can we drive it on the roads? The engines would certainly discourage tailgating

    7. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by djtack · · Score: 2, Informative

      So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament.

      Perhaps, but it seems there are some vets out there with money. Here's an interesting article about the Czech-built L39 Albatros (among others) being flown as a civilian sport jet.

    8. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by SiliconJesus101 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Uhmmm...no. It's classified "experimental" and could in fact be flown by a private individual. This is the same thing that is done with the old warbirds, Mig 21's and bombers that private parties fly. More info can be found here: http://www.utility-aircraft.com/catalog/certificat e/index.htm

      You do need an actual special reason for flying the plane, but aside from that it is quite possible for a private party to own and fly a military jet.

      --

      "The strong will do what they want, the weak will do what they must."
      -Thucydides

    9. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Blimey85 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it supposedly comes with bomb racks according to the ebay description.

      --
      How is it that one careless match can start a forest fire, but it takes a whole box to start a campfire?
    10. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by B3ryllium · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's a plane ... what are they going to do, send out an F117A and shoot you down?

      Come to think of it, they would, wouldn't they? Nevermind. Just buy the island and get out of the damned country. :)

    11. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AJWM · · Score: 4, Interesting

      On the other hand, if you buy it unassembled, you could assemble it yourself and have it qualified as an experimental aircraft, plus save $8million. You'd still have to follow the rules for experimental aircraft, but that's true of any homebuilt.

      --
      -- Alastair
    12. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Interesting
      If a private citizen has a spare 9 Million $ kicking around, then they could probably hire an ex-military pilot to train them.

      as for getting permission to take off; money could probably ease that process a bit as well.

      --
      Paul Lenhart writes words!
    13. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by rogerwong · · Score: 5, Informative

      It's currently impossible to get a Letter of Authorization (LOA) from the FAA, because the FAA have phased out LOAs.

      Instead, you now get certified, by an authorized instructor, for certain classes of experimental aircraft. The DC-F18 is part of Group IX, along with the F-15 and Mig 29.

      See this FAA document for more details:
      http://www.warbirds-eaa.org/news/n_8700-24.pdf

    14. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 4, Funny

      I'm sure a bomb rack would hurt if you dropped it on someone's head.

      --
      --

      FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
    15. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by flewp · · Score: 5, Informative

      If they sent out an F117 you'd be lucky. It has no air to air capabilities.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
    16. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by sfjoe · · Score: 4, Funny

      So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament.

      I think my next-door neighbor is hiding WMD (or so my intelligence indicates) so this fighter might be just the thing for this imminent threat.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    17. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by M1FCJ · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Allegedly such (back to combat configuration) conversions are trivial. Google couldn't find me a web site but I recall reading an article on one of the rec.mil* newsgroups some time ago such a conversion was done to prove it is possible and it took less than 24 hours (provided that you already have everything you need in stock).

      A high performance military jet is still a military jet. They can be used for all sorts of purposes, recon being one.

      I live very close to Imperial War Museum's Duxford Airfield in Cambridge and occassionaly go there to have a walk. They have a number of jet combat aircraft owned by private organizations/people.

    18. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by silconous · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Jet holds 10800 lbs of JP5 without External fuel tanks.

      I know I used to work on them in the Avionics shop VMFA-232

    19. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't worry, now Concorde's gone the US govt. will miraculously repeal that particular edict just in time for Boeing to introduce a supersonic airliner.

      Betcha.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    20. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by The+Dobber · · Score: 4, Funny

      Cept of course if they take you out while its sitting up on cinder block in the backyard.

    21. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Funny
      You do need an actual special reason for flying the plane
      Does strafing the neighbours' backyard count as a 'reason'?

      But seriously, what would such a special reason be? Airshows?
      --
      If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
    22. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by M1FCJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When you are flying, it's the weight that counts.

    23. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can think of one, but I reckon he got his flight status revoked in 1972 due to being AWOL.

    24. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think his current millitary rank might override that.

    25. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by CrazyTalk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Thats what they tought us in school (I was an Aero Eng major a lifetime ago). Interestingly, IIRC if you go really, really fast (hypersonic, > Mach 5) the shock wave becomes so narrow and close to the plane that sonic booms are no longer a problem. Its only around the low Mach numbers that you get these really wide shock waves that still have a lot of strength when they hit the ground.

    26. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by headGasket · · Score: 4, Informative

      WHAT??!?! According to this article flying a MiG21 costs about 500 gallons of jet fuel for 15 minutes. Double that for a F18 your at 4000 gallons an hour; about 10 000$ an hour. You can do a lot more than take off and land in an hour.

      --
      6E8C 8721 B3D9 5269 5A9B 1122 00C3 C03D 99A7 1CFC
    27. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by dj51d · · Score: 4, Informative

      Typically such an aircraft would be registered Experimental/Exhibition and the allowed uses are for exhibition(airshows) and proficiency flights. Any flight not for an airshow is considered a proficiency flight.

    28. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by trentblase · · Score: 2, Funny

      Dude, he flew a Stealth Bomber in Broken Arrow. And I'm sure they kicked him out after stealing the nukes. Hence, ex-military.

    29. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yep, coz Boeing has no dealings with the US govt. at all.

      Are you insane?

      BTW, is this the same marketplace that the US DOESN'T ALLOW the Japanese to compete in?

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    30. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Detritus · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Per hour costs are based on more than the cost of fuel. The military has extensive statistics on things like maintenance. You may have to pay for 30 man-hours of maintenance, on average, for each hour in the air. Then there are replacement parts, overhauls, scheduled inspections, consumables, etc.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    31. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Detritus · · Score: 3, Informative
      The Navy had made navigation a well-established science, well before the introduction of the airplane. The airplane was treated as a "ship of the air" in many other ways. It has a captain, with the final authority and responsibility for the operation of the aircraft.

      The nautical mile is equal to one second of arc along a great circle of the Earth, which is convenient for navigation. It isn't just some arbitrary unit.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    32. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by jmauro · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was santized when it was transfered out of the Blue Angels not when it was transfered in. The Thunderbirds and Blue Angels both use standard military equipment outfitted like any other military airplane. Radar, bomb mounts, etc. They could be used to drop bombs or intercept planes as long as the ordinace was onhand to do so. The only thing different is the paint job.

      My guess is that they removed some of the most critical items but by and large the plane still has its original engines, flight systems, etc. It looks like it just fell through the cracks.

    33. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've watched too much Discovery Wings. The F117A was given an "F" designation despite no air-to-air capability was to mollify the hot-shot fighter jocks who were chosen to fly the plane.

    34. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Informative

      A sonic boom is only a fixed boom for an individual observer, not a one time crack as the plane exceeds the speed of sound. Sonic booms are caused by shockwaves following along after the moving object. You'll only hear it once (unless you outrun the object and then wait for it to go by again), but it's a sustained shockwave for as long as the plane is flying fast enough.

      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
    35. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by WheatWilton · · Score: 3, Informative

      JP5 (or JP8) jet fuel is kerosene based and significantly cheaper than the gas we buy at the pump. 4000 gallons of the stuff could probably be had for under $2000. The real issue is that those 15 minutes in the air require a dozen hours or so of highly trained mechanics working on the plane before you can take it up again.

    36. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by iamwahoo2 · · Score: 3, Informative

      The F117 supposedly can carry sidewinders

    37. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 3, Funny

      As far as I know, Larry Ellison never got permission to buy that Russian MiG 29. Maybe, he can plunk down some of his pocket change for the F/A-18. I believe that given the state of the economy and of affairs in the world, one should strive to buy domestic instead of foreign. However, it seems as if he may have had an easier time getting a license to fly the MiG than the Hornet. If he can't fly it, maybe he can have a mast attached and sail it in America's Cup competition.

    38. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by jayteedee · · Score: 3, Informative
      You'll only hear it once


      Actually you'll hear it two or more times. Once for the leading shock wave (nose of the aircraft) and once for the tail shock wave. Very close together, and they almost sound like one boom, but there is actually two. There can also be more than two if you have sharp angles on the plane, like around where the wings are attached to the fuselage, or anywhere else that has a sharp transition.

      --
      Religion and science are both 90% crap..but that doesn't negate the other 10%.
    39. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Actually...I consider myself pretty much in the middle...leaning slightly right on financial issues.

      I never cared what Clinton did to get out of the war..it was very common for that war, especially after people discovered the kind of war it was, to try to do everything within their means to get out of it. Bill went the scholar/travelling way...Bush did the Nat'l Guard..etc. Heck, my Dad got out of it due to college too I think. So, I don't really hold any of that against anyone. I do have problems with Clinton after he lied while in office in a court of law...

      But, to re-iterate, I don't think things these guys did while young idiot men (like we all are at 20+) should have much to do with their qualifications today. That was my main point....

      ps. What is a non-con? Is this similar to a neo-con? I've seen these thrown around everywhere, and don't understand what it is...tia.

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    40. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've also heard that the F117 could be fitted for air-to-air capability but sidewinders seems unlikely. Sidewinders have an IR sensor on the nose to seek the hot tail exhaust of enemy jets and would need to be mounted outside of the internal bomb bays to be effective. If the sidewinders are mounted outside, the low radar profile of the F117A would be compromised and the jet would lose its best asset. Mounting the sidewinder in the internal bay would preserve the low radar profile while the sidewinders are in the compartment but the would also lose its ability to carry ground ordnance. Deploying the sidewinders from the internal bays would also adversely affect the aerodynamics of the F117A and create a higher radar profile, neither of which is desirable for a relatively slow jet that will be engaging in air-to-air combat.
      Theoretically, sidewinders can be mounted on this special purpose jet, but in doing so, the F117A loses its strengths and is forced into a role for which it is less suitable.

    41. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by somekindofuniguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here in NZ there's a largish fleet of private military jets flying out of Ardmore airfield. Why? Because since we ditched our Airforce's strike capability, the Army and Navy have no way to train against being attacked from the air - so they pay private operators to 'attack' them with jets like these.

    42. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by DoctorPepper · · Score: 2, Informative

      non-con=Non-Commissioned Officer, if IIRC

      Actually, that's noncom Noncoms Guide, more commonly refered to as NCO.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    43. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Informative
      Btw, the most common speed unit is knots, not mph or km/h and knots is a naval unit measured by a number of knots on a rope that's trailing the ship in a given time period.

      I was going to call bullshit, because it was always my understanding that a knot == 1.15mph (something to do with the distance of a nautical mile at the equator as I recalled), but it turns out that you are correct. According to this website:

      The term knot or nautical mile, is used world-wide to denote one's speed through the water. Today, we measure knots with electronic devices, but 200 years ago, such devices were unknown. Ingenious mariners devised a speed-measuring device both easy to use and reliable, the "log line."

      From this method, we get the term "knot." The log line was a length of twine marked at 47.33 foot intervals by colored knots. At one end a log chip was fastened; it was shaped like the sector of a circle and weighted at the rounded end with lead. When thrown over the stern, it would float pointing upward and would remain relatively stationary. The log line was allowed to run free over the side for 28 seconds and then hauled on board.

      Knots which had passed over the side were counted. In this way, the ship's speed was measured.

      Google also says that a knot = 1.15077945 mph or 1.85200 kph.

      So I stand corrected :) Glad I researched that before opening my big mouth. Learn something new every day...

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    44. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by DoctorPepper · · Score: 4, Informative

      He's absolutely right. In military aircraft, especially Navy aircraft, everything is measured in pounds. When I was in the Navy, I worked on the F-14A Tomcat. That plane would hold 16,400 lbs of fuel without the drop tanks, over 20,000 with drop tanks. Add that to the dry weight of over 48,000 lbs, and you've got one HEAVY airplane!

      I've seen them take the catapult stroke at over 72,000 lbs.

      --

      No matter where you go... there you are.
    45. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by T-Ranger · · Score: 2, Funny

      Signal corps actually. So their speeds shold be measured in BAUD :)

    46. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by Shakrai · · Score: 2, Informative
      The F117A was not specifically designed to avoid radar from above.

      Wrong, it was designed to defeat radar from above. Else it would have been useless against the Soviets who deployed their own airborne radar.

      The F117A does not have radar to seek out airborne targets, because radar signals would also give away its position.

      You don't need radar to seek out an AWACS. You can either be directed to it by your own forces or seek it out by tracking it's emissions.

      If the F117A were designed to attack AWACS or other "high value" airborne targets, it would be an incredibly poorly suited design for that purpose.

      I didn't say it was designed to do that -- I said that was a possible mission back in the Cold War when we actually stood a chance of fighting an Air Force equal to our own. It's a very moot point now as none of our recent foes have Air Forces let alone AWACS or any other airborne HVTs for that matter. The F-22 would probably be better suited to this mission nowadays anyway -- but the F-22 didn't exist back in the 80s when the F-117 was designed.

      In addition, the relatively slow speed (sub-sonic) of a the F117A and its lack of radar make it a poor interceptor

      Yeah because it's real hard to catch a converted airliner. I already addressed the lack of radar -- they would have been directed to the target by friendly AWACS or ground stations. As you pointed out using radar in this role would be stupid because it would reveal the location of the F-117 long before it was within weapons range of it's intended target.

      not to mention previously mentioned the failings of adding sidewinders on this attack aircraft.

      Sorry, but those failings only exist in the minds of those idiots that have no idea what they are talking about. Do you really think you can't use Sidewinders in an internal bay? Hint: The F-22 carries all it's weapons in internal bays and the AIM-9 is certified for use on the F-22.

      I don't pretend that the F-117 was designed for this role (anti-AWACS). Only that I've heard it rumored from knowledgeable sources that it is considered to be a possible mission for the F-117. If you look at at the capabilities of this aircraft then it makes perfect sense. Using it as a fighter would be utterly pointless -- using it to blind your enemy in the opening stages of a massive air to air battle would be ideal. Why do you refuse to admit that this is a possibility?

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    47. Re:Assembly AND Military Experience Required by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Wrong, it was designed to defeat radar from above. Else it would have been useless against the Soviets who deployed their own airborne radar.

      That's baloney. It was designed to evade radar from all angles. Its faceting profile is most effective on radar signals from the front, sides and below.


      You don't need radar to seek out an AWACS. You can either be directed to it by your own forces or seek it out by tracking it's emissions.

      That would be really difficult because the AWACS or other airborne target would be continuously moving and the F117A would have to receive constant flight corrections. The F117A pilot would not be able to acknowledge receiving directions for fear of giving away his position from his radio emissions. Once in the general area, the F117A would still need to be able to track by sight which is incredibly difficult if you don't know if the target is above, below or behind you. The F117A does not have any sophisticated tracking devices as it has optical/IR and probably GPS devices, consistent with its mission as a ground attack aircraft.


      I didn't say it was designed to do that -- I said that was a possible mission back in the Cold War when we actually stood a chance of fighting an Air Force equal to our own. It's a very moot point now as none of our recent foes have Air Forces let alone AWACS or any other airborne HVTs for that matter. The F-22 would probably be better suited to this mission nowadays anyway -- but the F-22 didn't exist back in the 80s when the F-117 was designed.


      A possible mission, but not a probable mission given the design of the F117A. Btw, the Skunk Works started working on the F117A in the 70's, not the 80's; President Jimmy Carter alluded to it in a speech (for which he was roundly ridiculed).

      Indeed, the F-22 a dedicated fighter/interceptor is a much better suited aircraft for hunting airborne targets. The Raptor is actually designated F/A-22 (fighter/attack) because it can carry the JDAM, but it seems an unlikely attack aircraft. Given current military/political doctrine, I suppose expensive military hardware has to have a multi-role capability.


      Yeah because it's real hard to catch a converted airliner.

      A converted airliner is still a constantly moving target and the F117A is not a fast plane. It still has to hunt this thing down in the skies without benefit of it's own radar and would be easy prey for any fighter escorts whose ability to detect the F117A would be on par with the F117A's ability to detect its target.


      Sorry, but those failings only exist in the minds of those idiots that have no idea what they are talking about. Do you really think you can't use Sidewinders in an internal bay? Hint: The F-22 carries all it's weapons in internal bays and the AIM-9 is certified for use on the F-22.

      Name calling is always a good way to make your point.


      The internal bays of the F117A are different from the F-22. The F117A bays are underneath the jet, designed for holding bombs not AIM-9s. The F-22 deploys the IR guided AIM-9's only from its side bays, and although opening the bays at high speed would adversely affect the handling of the aircraft, the side bays have a lesser effect on aerodynamics than from the bottom. In addition, the F-22 can track the target with its own radar, close in enough to use its AIM-9s or select an medium range radar guided AMRAAM, which are fired from standoff distances and can be more safely deployed from the bottom bays.

  2. Ellison? by BWJones · · Score: 4, Informative

    Hmmmm. This sounds like the owner might have been Larry Ellison. There have been a number of Mig-29's available in private hands over the years as well as a couple of F-104 Starfighters. I don't know if Larry owned an F-18, or an F-16 but I talked to him at a Java conference (at least I'm pretty sure it was Ellison) years ago and he expressed an interest in obtaining fighter jets like the Mig-29. Someone told me that he recently married, so perhaps his wife would rather he not go "jetting off" and would like him to calm his lifestyle a bit?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Ellison? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Oh I see. Its like trading in the corvette, for a station wagon or in this case, trading in the jet fighter for the family cessna.

    2. Re:Ellison? by the+melon · · Score: 5, Informative

      It is actually a doctor who owns it. I saw a program on Discovery Wings a year or two ago that had him and the plane in it. They gave his name but I cannot remember what it was.

      He said the only real restriction that was on the plane was one that is on all civilian aircraft: No supersonic flight over US airspace.

  3. Two weks from now... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    Positive Feedback: A+++++++++++++!!!! Bomb racks work great! Thanks!!!!!11

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Two weks from now... by I'm+Spartacus! · · Score: 2, Funny

      That sounds just like Dubya.

      --
      "War is God's way of teaching Americans geography." -- Ambrose Bierce
  4. Government oversight? by warlockgs · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Interesting. Are there any sort of government oversights as to how these can be sold and to whom? I would hate for some wack-job with money to get a hold of one of these, get some armament via the black market, and use it to do something regrettable.

    1. Re:Government oversight? by sfjoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      I would hate for some wack-job with money to get a hold of one of these, ...

      Too late - he's already got 'em. And I don't think you should be calling the President of the USA a "wack-job".

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    2. Re:Government oversight? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 3, Funny
      I would hate for some wack-job with money to get a hold of one of these, get some armament via the black market, and use it to do something regrettable.

      I would imagine that most wack-jobs would choose to save about $8,990,000 by mounting their black market arms on the back of a pickup truck instead of on this jet.

    3. Re:Government oversight? by IdleTime · · Score: 2, Funny

      I guess you didn't check the link, did you?
      If you had, you would have seen that Bin-Laden is one of the bidders!

      --
      If you mod me down, I *will* introduce you to my sister!
  5. weee by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    apparently the FBI knocked on his door to see where he got it...

  6. Yeah. eBay. by superdan2k · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most things on eBay seem to go for damn-near retail price, so I'm guessing that a MiG-29 would get bid through the roof and have a value near to that of its Western counterparts (despite its less-than competitive combat avionics). You could probably get the MiG cheaper by just going to Russia to buy it. Like the price of a Hummer H2 (~$50K), I'm guessing. Some underpaid Russian general or mobster would probably jump at the chance.

    --
    blog |
  7. Very cool, if i were rich... by Squeezer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd want to own one of these...Heinkel HE-162

    http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF-8 &oe=UTF-8&q=heinkel+he-162&sa=N&tab=wi

    German WW2 jet fighter, fought in the last weeks of the war. Top speed of 521 mph. None left are light worthy though. The BMW-003 jet engine used in it had a lifetime of 10-12 hours, unfortunately.

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  8. Yeah, right... by kemapa · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'll park it right in between the Bentley and the "In your dreams..."

  9. Flight Hours on Airframe by DaRat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    3700 odd flight hours, many of Blue Angels type maneuvers. Probably some significant stress and wear on that airframe due to the type of flying. There probably was a good reason that aircraft was retired.

    Also, the article should have read "F16 Fighting Falcon" for one of the upcoming aircraft, not "F16 Hornet"

    1. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by stilwebm · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually 3700 flight hours is fairly small for a plane of this age. Most commercial planes have a 20,000 operating hour overhaul schedule.

    2. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 5, Funny

      Most commercial planes have a 20,000 operating hour overhaul schedule.

      When was the last time your Delta pilot did a barrel roll?

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    3. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by HardCase · · Score: 5, Informative
      3700 odd flight hours, many of Blue Angels type maneuvers. Probably some significant stress and wear on that airframe due to the type of flying. There probably was a good reason that aircraft was retired.


      Not at all - the maintenance schedule on military aviation is extraordinarily rigorous, because of the type of flying that is done and because much of the equipment (for its time) is cutting edge, at least mechanically speaking.


      The maneuvers that the Blue Angels and Thunderbirds do are the same maneuvers that all of the pilots of those aircraft perform. It's just that the demonstration teams perform them as a group. My old naval aviation buddies tell me that the Blue Angels' jets actually get easier use than the regular jets. They certainly don't have to make any arrested landings or catapault takeoffs!


      -h-

    4. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by Kombat · · Score: 3, Funny

      When was the last time your Delta pilot did a barrel roll?

      December 26, 2002.

      --
      Like woodworking? Build your own picture frames.
    5. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Funny

      The Thunderbirds don't actually exist in real life, man.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    6. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by KrispyKringle · · Score: 3, Informative
      Yes they do. Obviously it depends on the type of airplane, but if you put a Cessna through a barrel roll, you'd better be ready to retire it (when I was getting my training, some guy did exactly that with a 172R--they didn't discover who did it or when, but noticed during a routine inspection that all the control surfaces were out of whack). The maximum stresses on that plane are something like +3g -1g, if I remember right.

      Regardless, the FA-18 was undoubtedly built to take a good bit more stress than a Cessna. I can't see why the airframe would necessarily be any bit the worse for wear after so few flight hours, so long as it wasn't pushed past its limits (which I doubt the Navy would tolerate on a multi-million dollar piece of equipment like that).

    7. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by transient · · Score: 2, Informative

      Max load factors for utility category airplanes are +4.4g -2.2g. Aerobatic category airplanes are certified for +6g -3g. I believe there is a 150% safety factor built into these numbers as well, so a utility category airplane (such as a Cessna 172, when loaded properly) must be able to actually withstand +6.6g -3.3g. Now, bear in mind that the real-life numbers match the book when the plane rolls of the assembly line, and decrease with age. You sure as hell won't catch me pushing a '77 Skyhawk to its design limits.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    8. Re:Flight Hours on Airframe by RockyMountain · · Score: 3, Interesting
      A barrel roll, unlike a loop, can be performed without noticably exceeding the normal 1G.

      Quite true, in many aircraft types.

      slow rolls being done without the knowledge of passengers

      Not quite true.

      Don't confuse barrel rolls and slow rolls. A slow roll, properly executed, involves minus one G (a.k.a. hanging upside down from your seatbelt). It also involves significant sideways G during the knife-edge portions.

      By the way, "slow" in "slow roll" isn't really a measure of the speed of the roll, only the type of roll. (And, roll-rate isn't a judging criterion in aerobatic competition.) The name came about because slow rolls are inherently slower than snap/flick rolls.

      In a nutshell:

      Barrel roll: Corkscrew-shaped flight path. Curvature of flight path during the inverted portion keeps the pilot feeling positive G force.

      Slow roll: maintain a constant, level, undeviating flight path, while rotating around the longitudinal axis.

      Snap/flick roll: Snap=US term, flick=UK term. Combined use of yaw and rapid pich change to cause one wing to stall (stop producing much lift). Rotation results from the unbalanced lift generated by the other wing. Rotation is usually quite rapid.

      Aileron roll: Lazy pilot's slow roll. Like a slow-roll, but the flight path is a freefall-like parabola rather than a straight, level line, which makes it much easier to coordinate.

      Rolling turn: Like a slow roll, but the flight path is a curved, turning, level path.

      Only snap/flick, slow, and rolling turns are used in IAC sanctioned competition, other than in freestyle where anything goes,

      RockyMountain.
      (Competition aerobatic pilot, Pitts Special).

  10. I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it? by baywulf · · Score: 5, Funny

    "I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it?"

    I would guess it would cost about 5 years in camp X-ray.

  11. Dorn? Is that you? by memoryhole · · Score: 4, Interesting

    According to IMDB, Michael Dorn owns (or used to) a T-33 and an F-86, among others. I wonder if it's him. Imdb link

    1. Re:Dorn? Is that you? by dj51d · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I doubt it. He sold the T-33 to buy the F-86, and later Sold to F-86 to Apollo 8 commander Frank Borman. Last I knew Mr. Dorn was flying a North American T-39 Sabreliner

  12. Pepsi will buy it... by Deathlizard · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...So they can give it to the guy that turned in all the pepsi points for the Harrier Jet.

    Of course a Hornet is not quite a Harrier, but I dont think the guy will care.

  13. bah! by filtur · · Score: 3, Funny

    Everybody has a Mig-29 these days.

  14. Kick Ass by barenaked · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if they include a free tank of gas with the purchase....

  15. There is a fomerly privately owned MIG-23 in OH by pmancini · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a MIG-23 in Dayton, OH at the museum at Wright Patterson AFB. It was bought by a private investor and then the mean U.S. Government confiscated it because, gosh darn, it was nuclear capable! Clearly labled as such! A Russian General unable to get money for food and other supplies from his government sold it.

    http://www.planetware.com/photos/US/OHUASF1.HTM

    Note the tri-foil on the nose cone!

    1. Re:There is a fomerly privately owned MIG-23 in OH by ptomblin · · Score: 3, Informative

      Duh. The tri-foil on the nose cone is warning about the radiation from the radar, not from nuclear weapons.

      "If you are close enough to read this, the nukes had better not be going off just yet."

      --
      The next Cmdr Taco duplicate will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and see it early!
  16. Correction... by rampant+mac · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...claims they'll soon be auctioning off an F-16 Hornet..."

    That would be F-16 Fighting Falcon. Of course, this is Slashdot and it wouldn't surprise me if they mistakenly called it an F-16 Elbow.

    --
    I like big butts and I cannot lie.
  17. Sounds like fun by StuWho · · Score: 5, Funny

    I think I'll buy it... It's time the war against the RIAA, SCO, and Microsoft became more than just a metaphor! Warn Redmond air traffic control to expect me soon...

    --
    "If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car payments." Earl Wilson
  18. If you have the cash...buy it assembled by SquierStrat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Being a aviation mechanic for the Marine Corps, I'm going to tell you that you want hte thing flight worthy...the assembly isn't something you would want to tackle yourself. In short: it's a bitch.

    And to the person doubting you could get an LOA for it...that's crap. The question is would you want to fly it?

    --
    Derek Greene
    1. Re:If you have the cash...buy it assembled by paganizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hmm.
      I'm an ex-navy fire control & Avionics tech for this bird (lot 12 being the last one I worked on).
      What say we see who buys it and offer ourselves as ground crew? I've got a friend who's a BB stacker, just need a power guy...
      Assuming, of course, that it has the AN/APG-65 radar/avionics package still onboard; thats what I can't see the Navy willing to let fall into private hands, but I also can't see the bird flying without it, it's fairly integrated.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    2. Re:If you have the cash...buy it assembled by paganizer · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Uh-huh.
      I think we need to stick with Navy & Navy Security (Marines) on this one.
      BB Stacker on the F/A-18 would be a ordnance specialist, someone who does storage, testing & mounting; I understand the USAF uses 3 or 4 separate people for the job; we never had that luxury.

      So the Proper mix would be:
      1 AQ/AT (for electronics, weapons control, radar)
      1 BB Stacker (AO)
      1 AE (Electrical)
      1 Hydraulics (can't remember the rate or MOS)
      1 Airframe Mech (probably not neccesary unless you are going to be buying that $4mil Brazilian Aircraft Carrier thats for sale, also).
      1 Power Plant monkey to keep the engines running.

      So, say 6 guys, minimum (I've been on a detached team that did it with 5, but it was only for one flight). I would want to have a experienced Fleet plane captain available to do the stuff we don't have a specialist for.

      and they would only need to be A&P certified if it was all done legally; if we are just doing this for a RIAA strike, we just need it to work.

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    3. Re:If you have the cash...buy it assembled by paganizer · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll keep my eye on the auction.
      have you worked on Lot 6? will you work for free if this develops into a RIAA strike mission? I'm sure the employer will want to know...

      --
      Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
  19. Lawn Ornament by EverlastGobstopp · · Score: 5, Funny

    "So unless you're ex-military, you'd have yourself a $9 million lawn ornament." I would love to have a F/A-18 sitting out on my lawn. In the fall I could use the afterburners to clear all the leaves from my yard. In the winter they could melt the snow on my driveway. I haven't thought of a use for spring and summer yet...

    1. Re:Lawn Ornament by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

      I haven't thought of a use for spring and summer yet...

      Barbeques!

    2. Re:Lawn Ornament by jcdick1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Umm...afterburners...

      Barbecue?

      --
      What?
    3. Re:Lawn Ornament by ckaminski · · Score: 2, Funny

      Keeping Jehovah's Witnesses away??

  20. Assuming it's bought "assembled" by benlinkknilneb · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    How do they deliver it?

    --
    It must be Thursday... I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    1. Re:Assuming it's bought "assembled" by WWWWolf · · Score: 2, Informative
      Assuming it's bought "assembled" How do they deliver it?

      Reminds me of one picture in an aviation magazine when the Finnish Air Force got their F-18 Hornets. The Hornet was escorted by a couple of Saab Drakens. That was probably the only picture in the world where a hornet was bigger than a dragon...

    2. Re:Assuming it's bought "assembled" by Zak3056 · · Score: 3, Funny

      How do they deliver it?

      Airborne Express? :)

      --
      What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
    3. Re:Assuming it's bought "assembled" by The+Bungi · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Let's just say that the stock price for the company that makes bubble wrap is about to go through the roof.

      Afterwards the lucky winner gets to recoup some of the $9M by selling 4x4m patches of bubble wrap at $50, easing the anxieties of thousands.

      Later, the guy is sued by the makers of Prozac.

      You heard it here first.

  21. And the top bidder is... by iblink · · Score: 4, Funny

    someone named fashionpillows. Go figure.

    1. Re:And the top bidder is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      His prior winning bids include a Porsche 911 for $14K, a copy of Windows Business Server, and a MCSE certification kit. I guess MCSE really does pay off after all...

  22. Odd... by barryfandango · · Score: 5, Funny

    Listed in category: Consumer Electronics > Radios: CB, Ham & Shortwave > Ham Radio > Accessories > Antennas

    For a million bucks this better get good reception.

    --
    In all matters of opinion, our adversaries are insane. -Oscar Wilde
  23. DHS Message of the Day: by jafac · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember; eBay supports Terrorism.

    --

    These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  24. How are they serious? by lostchicken · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Looking at the minimun bid of $1 mil, that means that there have, so far, been 7 people willing to fork over $1,000,000 for something. Now, looking at the feedback for these people, I can't possibly see how some of them could pay for this. wtmahan has bought repair manuals for a 1995 Nissan Protege. Anybody who drives one of those, and wants to fix it him/herself probably cannot afford an F/A-18. The current high bidder has bought a bunch of shirts and a $15,000 Porche, not cheap, but not a car for a person who can spend $1mil on an airplane kit.

    --
    -twb
    1. Re:How are they serious? by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

      They might be looking at this as a business investment - can you imagine the commercial possibilites for supersonic cropdusting? You don't make much on each field, but the volume...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:How are they serious? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The current high bidder has bought a bunch of shirts and a $15,000 Porche

      Aren't you making a pretty big assumption? It seems entirely plausible that the Porsche is just one of many sports cars "fashionpillows" owns. Maybe it was good deal or maybe it was just easier for them to buy it on eBay and have it delivered to the beach house or whatever...

    3. Re:How are they serious? by Dun+Malg · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Looking at the minimun bid of $1 mil, that means that there have, so far, been 7 people willing to fork over $1,000,000 for something. Now, looking at the feedback for these people, I can't possibly see how some of them could pay for this. wtmahan has bought repair manuals for a 1995 Nissan Protege. Anybody who drives one of those, and wants to fix it him/herself probably cannot afford an F/A-18. The current high bidder has bought a bunch of shirts and a $15,000 Porche, not cheap, but not a car for a person who can spend $1mil on an airplane kit.

      The high bidder now apparently sells juggling clubs for $20 a pop. He can't possibly be serious. The guy who was high bidder this morning at least had among his past purchases a pilot's carry-on bag, a wooden model of a twin engine Cessna, and some sort of "pilot training on CD" software.

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
  25. Re:How much longer... by bluekanoodle · · Score: 3, Insightful
    While I agree we see a lot of these types of stories on ./ this one seems worthy of the front page. It's not everyday that you can buy a fighter jet on the internet.



    It's been said the Internet is the great equalizer, a single man can be as big as a large corporation, but this levels the playing field at the nation building level. :) At least it can bring you equal to many 3rd world country's Air forces.

  26. Re:Yeah. eBay. by druiid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why bother going to Russia to buy one? There are several companies that disassemble them, ship the parts to the US, re-assemble them, and then sell the MiG's. Last I checked they started at like $200k, though.

  27. Re:And they wonder why... by MoonBuggy · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm calling it an investment. I figure when the *IAA sees my hard drive it'll be cheaper to have a kitted up fighter jet to deal with the problem than it would be to pay what they ask.

  28. One more thing... by kidgenius · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now all you need is the Ebay Aircraft Carrier to launch the plane off of.

  29. Dangerous toys by paiute · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I know (or knew) a rancher who rebuilt a Mustang. He used to fly it over his cattle drives on occasion to keep an eye on things. One day the cowboys saw him fly it straight into the side of a hill. Not only was he rendered into many tiny pieces, but an irreplacable piece of American aviation history was lost forever.

    Men have this fascination with warbirds - both prop and jet. The problem is that these things were designed - especially the old WWII birds - to fly just this side of stable. Airspeed, altitude, and maneuverability were prioritized over forgiveness. Even well-maintained aircraft flown by pilots with many hours all too often augered in. That was the price the military knew they would have to pay to get the job at hand done.

    Now we see weekend amateurs with too much money flying these things, when they should be flying Cessnas.

    --
    If Slashdot were chemistry it would look like this:Cadaverine
    1. Re:Dangerous toys by delcielo · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The truth is that many of the kids who flew these in practice (especially the old warbirds like your mustang) had fewer hours than a lot of current pilots.

      It's all about the training and discipline. Getting good education and training, and then having the self discipline to follow those things as well as the normal "rules" of aviation. In other words, just because you have a mustang and know how to fly it, that doesn't make it safe to do low-level passes with your attention diverted to things on the ground. That was true when the airplane was flown in combat, too.

      The area that most new warbird owners seem to get into trouble on is fuel exhaustion. None of these birds really have large stores of fuel unless they have their external tanks with them. Kind of gets back to the discipline thing. You would want to keep in mind that unless you were an airshow pilot, the airplane just wouldn't be very useful.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
  30. this will look great by WormholeFiend · · Score: 3, Funny

    next to my George W Bush lawn-gnome

  31. jets on ebay by glk572 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    there have been several jets sold on ebay, the aforementioned cmdr warf, bought one this way, a gulfstream 4 went the same way. check out some of this guys other auctions, there's some stuff that the average slashdotter would be intrested in, http://www.stores.ebay.com/id=2445982

    --
    Well art is art isn't it, but then again water is water; and east is east; and west is west; and if you take cranberries
  32. Price increase? Was $850000 couple weeks ago by johu · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's old ad

    Did some googling couple weeks ago when it came up on ebay for first time and found photos of same plane while disassembled and under restoration. Didn't find URL, but shouldn't be that hard. Just follow links from official Blue Angel's web page to list of decomissioned planes. It was somewhere over there.

  33. Patrol boat doesn't sell on eBay by core+plexus · · Score: 2, Interesting
    This reminds me of something I read that is similar: "The state got no takers when it tried to sell an Alaska State Troopers patrol vessel on the eBay auction Web site. "It did not sell. We didn't receive any offers," trooper spokesman Greg Wilkinson said after the close of the auction last week." I wonder if this jet will do any better.

    -cp-

  34. i can think of certain problems... by cavac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    when buying a F18, even one in prime condition. First of all, what kind of airport do you need in terms of runway and infrastructure? Do F18 fly on commercial fuel without killing their afterburner?

    Would you need a special pilot license? I mean, this isn't exactly a two-seated Fokker but a supersonic jet.

    And last but not least, when the constitution amendment was made that everyone could bear arms i don't think politicians had state-of-the-art jet fighters in mind. Would be like allowing everyone to drive a tank...

    --
    Look, this thing is totally safe! Built it myself, you know. You just press that button like this and then turn that lev
  35. I get it! by LeoDV · · Score: 4, Funny

    You buy it to go with this!

    Accessorize baby, accessorize!

  36. "I'll make it worth your while..." by Embedded+Geek · · Score: 4, Funny
    You just made a serious mistake by not posting anonymously when you identified your skillset, my friend. If your friends are anything like mine, I can just imagine what's filling your inbox right now:

    You, know, I wasn't thinking of bidding on it until I saw your post. But I thought about it and maybe we can do the usual tech support thing. You know: you swing by and help me put it together. I'll provide the pizza and beer.

    So, are you busy next weekend or not?

    --

    "Prepare for the worst - hope for the best."

  37. Troy McClure by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi, I'm Troy McClure. You might remember me from such home improvement films as "Five Thousand Horsepower Leaf Blower", or "Replace your furnace with a jet turbine."

  38. this will go well with my aircraft carrier by Bhull · · Score: 3, Insightful

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?Vi ewItem&category=26432&item=2454839870

  39. then again... by Jafafa+Hots · · Score: 5, Funny

    it could possibly cost LESS for a private citizen.

    I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

    --
    This space available.
    1. Re:then again... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      But were you able to fund a place like A51 with the $5,990 left over?

    2. Re:then again... by RetroGeek · · Score: 5, Funny

      I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

      Well, ok, but with a toilet seat YOU supply the fuel.

      --

      - - - - - - - - - - -
      I am a programmer. I am paid to produce syntax not grammar. Deal with it.
    3. Re:then again... by Dun+Malg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      it could possibly cost LESS for a private citizen. I was able to buy a toilet seat for ten bucks instead of six grand.

      Can we let the $500 hammer, $10,000 coffee maker, and the $6K toilet seat myths go now? If you want to understand the REAL scam behind this stuff, this is a good overview of exactly how the money gets wasted. For those who don't follow links, here's the explaination of "overpriced" parts:

      So the total cost of the project is something like $22.5 Billion (over 5 or 10 years)....that $250 toilet seat or hammer you have heard about... The way they calculate that is to divide the entire cost of the project (including all the fixed costs and so on) over every part or tool on the entire project. And what still hasn't been mentioned is that in many "above board" projects, they had to pad the budgets enough to cover all the black-projects costs. So really a lot of the costs were for part of another program! This would be about as accurate as dividing your total income, by how many times you wipe your butt per year, and figuring that each flush costs you $136. In other words -- it never existed"
      So the "pays for Area 51" comments are probably accurate, but anyone who tries to pay their income taxes by dragging a Mr. Coffee and a used toilet seat into the IRS office and asking for two hammers in change is an idiot.
      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    4. Re:then again... by mav[LAG] · · Score: 4, Funny

      Well, ok, but with a toilet seat YOU supply the fuel.

      Of course in Soviet Russia....actually no, I'm not going to go there.

      --
      --- Hot Shot City is particularly good.
    5. Re:then again... by AhBeeDoi · · Score: 5, Funny
      So the "pays for Area 51" comments are probably accurate, but anyone who tries to pay their income taxes by dragging a Mr. Coffee and a used toilet seat into the IRS office and asking for two hammers in change is an idiot.

      Well, that explains the looks I got.

  40. MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    -1 Ignorant. There are plenty of ex-military (and non de-milled) aircraft flying around the country. They're classified as experimental aircraft. Poster andyrut is an idiot.

  41. Ah, the private arms market by nanojath · · Score: 3, Funny
    I wonder how much it would cost to fully arm it?


    How does a trip to Guantanamo Bay sound?

    --

    It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

  42. T-33s not rare by sphealey · · Score: 2, Informative
    T-33s are not uncommon. There are typically 5 or so for sale in any given issue of Trade-A-Plane. Buyer beware of course.

    Now a P-38...

    sPh

  43. What you're really buying by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 4, Informative

    is tihs. Not quite flyable condition...;)

    Yes, it can be put back together. But no, it's not in 'fly-away' condition.

    There are several ex-military jets in private hands. F-4's, F-86's, etc. And you can just return it to weapons capable status. *All* of the fire control circuitry will have been removed. And without that, a missile won't launch in anything other than a randowm direction, if at all.

    Given the restrictions on actually flying ex-military aircraft, it would be easier for a purported terrorist to drop a case of TNT out the door of a Cessna.

  44. What I wanna know.. by pedro · · Score: 4, Funny

    is, as an auto tinkerer that's been burned on this issue numerous times..
    What's a GASKET SET for this puppy go for??
    You'll need one in order to assemble it, yes?
    I'm betting *well* in excess of $1E6.
    8-P

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:What I wanna know.. by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually I know the answer to this one....

      The F/A 18 has a titanium ring gasket that clamps around the engine exhaust where the fusalage meets the engine. This thing is roughly 1/4" wide, about a 1/16 or an 1/8" of an inch thick with a little clamping lever - its about 30" in diameter or so...

      I was told when handling it at Fallon Naval Airstation in Nevada (top gun school at the time) that the gasket was 27,000 USD. each. and it requires 2 of them.

      and thats just one small part.

    2. Re:What I wanna know.. by bluGill · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Titanium has come down in price significantly in the past few years. (Been happening since the Russians realized they needed money and had Titanium) My last hammer was made form wood and titanium and Cost $70, of which the handle was $20. (Trust me, well made tools are worth that price if you use them everyday) 10 years ago the idea of a common person owning a titanium hammer wasn't even worth considering, the price would be outrageous.

    3. Re:What I wanna know.. by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2, Informative

      Claw is a little different on a claw hammer. It's a single, long, sharp point. The idea is breaking up rocks, which was the primary use. Then you'd grab a wood stake, flip the hammer over to the flat side, pound the stake in, find anohter rock, flip the hammer over, destroy the rock, etc. It was also durable enough that you could get 2 guys, hold the claw on a particularly stubborn rock, and hit the flat with a sledge hammer to break the rock.

      Hence, no wood handle.

  45. Right next to the Camaro... by christopher240240 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Does anyone know if standard concrete blocks will hold this puppy up?

  46. Sheesh look at that feedback by boobert · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think I would go spending a million bucks knowing this seller doesn't have 100% feedback.

    --
    Your ad here ask me how!
  47. Re:Yeah. eBay. by marshall_j · · Score: 2, Funny

    Good luck flying it back :D

    I can see the US air authorities having no problems with a MiG-29 just popping up on the radar coming towards them

  48. 9 million seems expensive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    After the breakup of the Soviet bloc you could pick up migs for salvage or scrap from abandoned bases in Eastern Europe and East Germany. These went for thousands or mere hundreds of dollars rather than millions, and many were fully working units. Most were bought up for scap and stripped down for titanium and other resources. Many however just 'disappeared'.

    Look at some figures for the armaments in East Europe pre 1989, and then see if you can find any stories which account for what happened to all that military gear. You may be slightly worried.

  49. weapons usage by mnemonic_ · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not sure how easy it'd be to use this demilitarized, declassified F/A-18 for weapons use. The aircraft in its current state has kamikaze potential like any other, but employment of any actual modern air platform weapons would be almost impossible. No weapons fire-control software, possibly no radar, no weapons pylons (required to handle the complex mechanical and electrical linkages with weaponry, subject to great stress).

    It might be possible to jury-rig some sort of home-made pylon (at great expense) for carrying dumb bombs (simple ones that do not require any type of software control, yes even "dumb" bombs have a small amount of computerized control), but then again you could do that with any aircraft. Any aircraft can be used to drop something (crop dusters, 172's, MD-500's etc.).

    Of course where the F/A-18 fundamentally differs from civilian aircraft is its performance (any civilian sport aircraft could out-turn it though), but even that is of scattered use. Maneuvering performance is only useful in air to air combat, and it would be impractical for this aircraft to be converted for usage with air to air weaponry by yourself, unless you have connections with very skilled weaponry engineers and a lot of time and money. Then again, if you have those connections and funds, you could probably buy a real military aircraft from Russia and not need this F/A-18 in the first place.

    Now its performance would of course increase its kamikaze potential, but due to its size, this aircraft would probably not be much more effective in that respect than a regional or business jet. And there are plenty of those around already.

    1. Re:weapons usage by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Informative

      no weapons pylons

      Dude, RTFA (auction.. hah!):

      Complete with extras including bomb racks, drop tanks and pylons.

      Sweet!

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  50. $10 million billboard? by Woogiemonger · · Score: 2, Informative

    Did you see the other thing Landa was selling? I'm sure some fool would pay ten million dollars for this for advertising maybe, but I bet it'd make a nice target for the F18.

  51. MIGs by tiny69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    After the wall fell, one of the airplane magazines had an article on one of the older MIGs (don't remember which model). At the time, you could pick them up for fairly cheap (well, cheap for being a jet). Since getting spare parts was some what difficult if even possible, the magazine recommended that if you REALLY wanted a MIG, buy two just so that you have spare parts.

    Another thing that I remember from the article, the jet on that MIG had a really slow spool up time. This meant that when you pushed the throttle to full, it would take the engine a while before it produced full power. This becomes a problem if you have to do a missed approached or abort a landing. This meant that when you landed that MIG, you would push the controls to full throttle before the wheels touched down, just in case. This is the same thing that planes do when landing on a carrier. But it seemed strange to do for a ground based runway.

    --
    Go not unto/. for advice, for you will be told both yea and nay (but have nothing to do with the question)
  52. Wait, our choice of paint? by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does that mean that I can finally have a flying Goatse?

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
  53. I wonder... by Badmovies · · Score: 4, Funny

    ..if this person knows something. They are suddenly selling a number of jet aircraft and at rock bottom prices. I'd better go and check if Martha Stewart sold her jets today. Might be time to get rid of the Veritech.

    --


    Andrew Borntreger
    Champion of cinematic disasters
  54. Selling lots of stuff by Bobulusman · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seller has a great deal of pricey stuff on Ebay. Top three, pricewise, are:

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eBayISAPI.dll? Vi ewItem&item=2460961703&category=26442
    Some sort of dirigible, $10M

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=4671&item=3077350284
    2 million feet of Corning fiber optic cable, $4.4M

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&ca te gory=4672&item=3078834871
    Warehouse, $1.1M

    --
    Cogito ergo sum in Slashdot.
  55. Yep... by Kjella · · Score: 4, Interesting

    There are several ex-military jets in private hands. F-4's, F-86's, etc. And you can just return it to weapons capable status. *All* of the fire control circuitry will have been removed. And without that, a missile won't launch in anything other than a randowm direction, if at all.

    Given the restrictions on actually flying ex-military aircraft, it would be easier for a purported terrorist to drop a case of TNT out the door of a Cessna.


    ...for one, pick your target. Air-to-air combat? Riiight. Even if you got one fully locked and loaded with the latest the US has to offer, a squadron of trained combat pilots would pick you out of the sky in no time flat.

    I guess you could take out a civilian airliner or two before they manage to take you out of the sky, but hell. Despite the increased security, I'm sure there are easier ways for that still, particularly since you can sabotage landings/take-offs.

    So it's basicly a bomber. What do you need? Speed? Nah. If you can reach the center of whatever no-fly zone before you can be shut down, that's good enough and they're not that big unless your target is a remote military base. Range? Nah. Just take off from the nearest feasible runway.

    Payload? Yeah, I guess. But then you're better off renting a transport plane anyway. And since the plane is toast anyway, either fly it in or lock/program the autopilot and parachute out. No guidance/launch system necessary, just the navigation in any basic plane.

    Basicly, this is a combat plane built to fight a war. Firepower to shoot down hostiles, range to reach enemy targets, hit fortified installations and moving targets, and return to base safely. Very little of that applies to a terrorist.

    Kjella

    --
    Live today, because you never know what tomorrow brings
  56. Answer: Buy an aircraft carrier by macshune · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hey, who needs an island? With this you can just sail into international waters AND have a massive pontoon-boat party while you fly your aeroplane.

    Also, if you were gonna try and export the plane, what could anyone do? Just fill the gas tank up, punch the throttle and fly to eastern Siberia or somewhere. It's not like the FAA will send up fighters to chase you down. I remember hearing something about how slow they are at doing that.

  57. Does B-L have a pilot's license? by fm6 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Can someone buy it without a background check? Kinda scary actually...
    Especially when you consider:
    Complete with extras including bomb racks, drop tanks and pylons.
  58. I know where this belongs...... by scharkalvin · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hope someone in the confederate air force buys it for the ghost squadron.

  59. Current highest bidder... by mrmag00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have to wonder what this fellow is into that is the current high bidder.

    According to his feedback he purchased a 19" roulette wheel, later 2 microsoft t-shirts, a microsoft training guide, then microsoft small business server, and finally a 1979 Porche. He's now bidding on a 1-million dollar aircraft.

    It just makes me wonder what this fellow is up to... and if I should be doing it too!

  60. Current high bidder by phorm · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's neat to see whom actually bids on these things. Checking out the comments on the high bidder:

    Perfect Transaction, Fast payment, True Gentleman, Please enjoy your PORSCHEAAA+

    and another less happy:
    only 1 bid & insisted that I sell him a MichaelJordan/ XP Bus Server SW for 9.99
    $gt; A winning bid is a winning bid; my friend! Period! ! ! Now ship my product!!!


    Quite amusing... these people live in a different world than I. Enjoy your PORSCHEAAA+ indeed

  61. Re: knots by SEAL · · Score: 4, Informative

    knots is a naval unit measured by a number of knots on a rope that's trailing the ship in a given time period.

    Where did you hear that?

    A knot is a nautical mile per hour. A nautical mile is one minute of latitude (1/60th of a degree of the Earth's circumference -- 6076 feet, versus 5280 feet for an English mile).

  62. I'm not sure you could launch an F-18 of that. by fredmosby · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Those foreign carriers can usually only launch harriers.
    French Carrier: 20,000 tons displacement
    American Carrier: 100,000 tons displacement

    1. Re:I'm not sure you could launch an F-18 of that. by Chokai · · Score: 3, Informative

      The issue is not the tonnage of the carrier but rather how many pounds the catapult can shoot to takeoff speeds.

      The French Clemenceau or newer DeGaulle class carriers are entirely capable of operating F18s, although not particularly efficiently due to deck space limitations. However you'd have to refit them by upgrading the catapults and putting arresting gear in that can stop a 40,000 pound plane. And of course only one country in the world has a company that makes equipment capable of handling a F18 for arrested landing. So unless you know a guy who can build cats in his backyard shop you are SOL.

  63. Is Yoda selling this? by scootr1 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Everything to assemble we have.

    Maybe it crash-landed in Dagobah.

  64. think it 's a scam by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I knew the rohntowers.com sounded familiar... The guy (Micheal Landa) has an alleged checkered past: http://www.bishoptower.com/landa/

  65. Just had a thought by Steno-RFC · · Score: 2

    There is over 700 thousand members at /. If we all chipped in just over $1 each we could buy this. Wanna do it? And then we could get together and overclock the fighter jet, sounds like fun, huh?

  66. Delivery by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2, Funny
    The listing says "WE WILL DELIVER." I sure hope my neighbor Ben isn't out on his deck grilling ribs when they do.

    "Hey, Andy, what the hell you got there?"

  67. MiG-29 ad - $10mil by istewart · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.aircraftbargains.com/ad/355/buy/

    Appears to be for sale by a "research organization" near Zhukovsky Airbase, where most Russian prototype aircraft are tested. I wouldn't know, but even though the Russian style is to use centralized radar on the ground, the FAA probably wouldn't allow any sort of experimental or combat radar. Of course, the first person to plop down 10 million takes it, whether playboy or desparate foreign government.

  68. GSAAuctions.gov has jets now and then by donheff · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can frequently find surplus Government jets and jet engines on GSA Auctions. There aren't any up right now, but you will find a few buses and boats and some nice jewelry. You never know where some of this stuff comes from - foreign gifts are sold without attribution to avoid state embarassment. A while back, we sold the Coast Guard Cutter Tamaroa featured in "The Perfect Storm."

  69. $8,100,500.00 and counting... by SlaveToTheGrind · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've been tracking the item for the past 10 minutes while reading this thread. The last two bidders (of 150 total) have been a person whose eBay experince seems to center around trading Playstation games, and someone from Canada who seems to primarily buy nerd-esque items on a regular basis.

    It's enough to make one think that there's some bid-jacking going on by people who aren't taking this seriously at all. Perhaps an eBay "Slashdotting" of sorts? :-)

    It'll be interesting to see what, if any, cleanup is needed to identify a real buyer after the auction closes...

  70. And then there's the Urban Legend.... by INVISIGOTH2 · · Score: 3, Informative

    maybe, but the story I got from a friend on the scene was, years ago, China was selling some of it's older aircraft for dollars and a gentleman from SoCal bought one, a MIG-15,for about $100k. Not a bad price when you consider that a P-51 airframe runs twice that. The day (and Plane) arrives and our hero gets a panicked call from the freight company to get his azz down to the docks. Our Asian buddies had sent the plane with the wings detached....with the CANNONS , RACKS AND ORDINANCE STILL ON BOARD. Trying to explain this to the Customs guys (one of which was my buddy, rolling on the dock in hysterics) was the high point of this dude's year. (And yes, they let him have the plane, after he stripped ALL the offensive gear of it, dockside.)

    --
    I want revenge. I'll settle for justice. Mercy is optional, but not very.
  71. Maintenance goes by time and hours. by annisette · · Score: 2, Insightful
    As a airplane's cycles increase (takeoff+landing)there are maintenance requirements. As engines aquire hours of opperation maintenance is required.

    However there are "time" maintenance requirements. This means your jet can stand idle in your hanger for lets say a couple of years (est.) and it is time for manditory landing gear rebuild, avionics can be in the 6 month time range.

    You may save fuel by not flying it much but the cost to keep it flyworthy is "almost" as eexpensive if it is in the air or not.

    Keeping it flyworthy (for flight at any time) is the key word here.

    I worked on a SAAB 380 twin turboprop, 2.5-3 mil used (I cleaned the interior, carpet, leather seats, glass. A great job, ANY airplane is totally cool) a 19 seater (20 seats and you need a steward-stewardess-FAA) and the landing gear rebuild was about $300,00.00.

    My guess for a F-18 yearly maintenance would be easily 100 million pennys a year, plus fuel and ground support when flying.

    And if I remember correctly the F-18 does not have a long range especially supersonic probably an hour or so if flying slow.

    a jet plane to get is a Chek trainer or a mig-17, all airplanes rock:)

    --
    I eat my grapes at room temperature, cuz the cold ones hurt my teeth
  72. SS-27 Nuclear Missile available on Polish E-Bay by Prehensile+Interacti · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I was forwarded this link last week from a Polish friend of mine.

    I don't have enough Polish to verify this, but apparently this is genuine, with war-head and all electronics removed. However you are aparently legally able to drive this around, with a special license from the ministry of transport.

    12,300.00zl is approx $3,000 USD - A bargain!

    Fancy a drive up to Utah anyone;)

  73. New Link by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&cate gory=4672&item=3079057375

    The price is now $29M + $9M to assemble it.

    What a bargain!