Slashdot Mirror


What's The Fastest Growing Linux Distro?

darthcamaro writes "What's the fastest growing Linux distro? This really solid article on InternetNews.com contains interviews with the Debian Project leader, the founder of Mandrake, SuSe, Red Hat and TurboLinux to get their take on who's the biggest and who's the baddest on the distro block. Also includes some interesting insight into the next round of releases."

46 of 530 comments (clear)

  1. From what I gather... by Leffe · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems to be Gentoo to me, it's always suggested when someone asks for a new distro(I won't say where though as I'm afraid of being laughed upon ;)), and everyone seem to be using it. I'm happy with Slackware and FreeBSD. I really should check our Gentoo, it might just work on my crappy 5 year old Wintel machine...

    And BSD is not dying!!

    1. Re:From what I gather... by MikeCapone · · Score: 5, Informative

      I really should check our Gentoo, it might just work on my crappy 5 year old Wintel machine...

      I wouldn't recommend it unless you don't want to actually work on that box.

      I mean, sure you could save on the compile times (good luck compiling KDE/gnome, Mozilla and Open Office on a "crappy 5 year old Wintel machine") by getting binaries, but then, why not just use Slackware or Debian...

    2. Re:From what I gather... by damiam · · Score: 5, Informative

      I realize you're trolling/joking, but Debian supports new hardware just fine. I installed it on my dual Athlon 2200+ w/ SB Audigy and Radeon 9700PRO a year ago, and it worked fine and still does. Myths about Debian's hardware support mostly seem to come from its lack of an autodetecting installer, although Knoppix and debian-installer are fixing that.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    3. Re:From what I gather... by cdefghijklmnop · · Score: 3, Informative

      What about if one uses ./configure && make && sudo /usr/sbin/checkinstall --install=yes ?

    4. Re:From what I gather... by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative
      I wouldn't recommend it unless you don't want to actually work on that box.

      While not very usable on a single 5 year old box, Gentoo can be used on such hardware. I manage a small network of systems that run Gentoo. Some are 5 years old. One of the systems is used to compile and build binary packages. All the other machines install or upgrade from these binary packages. Some of the other machines also participate in the compilation process using distcc.

      --
      The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
    5. Re:From what I gather... by Lispy · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry, but when exactly did Slackware loose "The distribution with attitude" feeling? We are havin quite some fun over at dropline, thank you! ;-)

      Lispy

    6. Re:From what I gather... by pantherace · · Score: 4, Informative
      I use gentoo on a p2-300 (ca 1997-8) & frankly it makes it HIGHLY usable.

      Most of the usablity improvements come from KDE 3.2 & linux 2.6 (though it was fast enough with 3.1.2 & 2.4) In fact, it is much more responsive than Windows (any version with a bit of security (not 9x, ME)), Fedora Core 1 (fresh install on a 1GHz P3-celeron, 256MB RAM & 10K rpm SCSI drive) Now admittedly the fedora installed very quickly. The recent updating included building most of the system over again (for about 6months only security related packages had been updated) which took about a week, but the system was still often usable while it was compiling (slow, but usable).

      Some people have argued that in a particular library/program compiling for -march= with gcc (as opposed to most of the binary distros -mcpu=) only leads to a 2-3% improvement in speed per program/libary. If true (and only that much), that adds up, X is 3% faster, Qt is 3% faster, kdelibs is 3% faster, konqueror is 3% faster= 112.6% faster, which is better than the change between any of the Pentium 4 Extremely expensive edition, and Athlon 64 (of which I have not seen ONE mainstream benchmark site running in 64-bit mode...Windows (beta) or Linux) Many over clockers don't get that much performance increase stablily.

      If you want to there is the GRP (Gentoo Reference Platform) which will install with binaries, so you don't have to compile everything.

    7. Re:From what I gather... by brsmith4 · · Score: 2, Informative

      FreeBSD 4.x and 5.x offer both redhat 6.2, 7.1 and 8.0 in the ports collection. Just thought you'd like to know. And for that parent, FreeBSD's linux emulation is absolutely impecable. There is no app I can't run from linux.

    8. Re:From what I gather... by pwagland · · Score: 2, Informative
      Some people have argued that in a particular library/program compiling for -march= with gcc (as opposed to most of the binary distros -mcpu=) only leads to a 2-3% improvement in speed per program/libary. If true (and only that much), that adds up, X is 3% faster, Qt is 3% faster, kdelibs is 3% faster, konqueror is 3% faster= 112.6% faster, which is better than the change between any of the Pentium 4 Extremely expensive edition, and Athlon 64 (of which I have not seen ONE mainstream benchmark site running in 64-bit mode...Windows (beta) or Linux) Many over clockers don't get that much performance increase stablily.
      What?!?!

      Are you implying that by adding libraries, your program will run faster? Hmm. My program is running slow today, better link in libz, that will give me a 3% performance boost!

      Rather, what you meant to say is that you will only see a 3% performance improvement if every single library that your program uses is also compiled with -march=... otherwise the performance won't even be that much better...

    9. Re:From what I gather... by jelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      "It can do DEB's too, from what I understand."

      But if a package uses autoconf (e.g. has a ./configure), then a simple 'deb-make ; fankeroot dpkg-buildpackage' already will build the deb, so why use something else?

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    10. Re:From what I gather... by beakburke · · Score: 2, Informative
      I've used checkinstall with great results for building RPM's from sources. It can do DEB's too, from what I understand.

      And Slackware's .tgz packages too.

      --
      ----- Question authority, but not ours. Hate the man, but we're not him.
    11. Re:From what I gather... by kinnell · · Score: 2, Informative
      But, WHY compile anyway?

      Because you don't have to worry about conflicting libraries and such like, because all programs are compiled against the libraries you have. This means that it is not necessary to keep a carefully managed central repository of packages like debian does. The portage system is based on scripts, so it's easy for someone to distribute an ebuild for a new package which just works. There is no need to distribute different versions for different releases, because fundamentally, the idea of a release in gentoo is irrelevant. There is no need for said package to be compiled and stored on gentoo servers, with the beaurocracy that entails. As a result, gentoo is bang up to date with just about every package you might want. This, and the lack of support for non-free software, is why I chose gentoo over debian. Otherwise, I agree with your comments about compiling, but like I said, it's not as big a hassle as everyone makes it out to be.

      --
      If I seem short sighted, it is because I stand on the shoulders of midgets
  2. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by millahtime · · Score: 3, Informative

    Red Hat isn't shrinking. It's not growing at the same rate but it's still growing. It's overall market dominace is shrinking but it's still growing. It's no longer the M$ of linux.

  3. according to google by enrico_suave · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's Debian *shrug*

    Results 1 - 20 of about 11,600. Search took 0.41 seconds

    Debian is the fastest growing GNU/Linux distro :: debianHELP ... ... We use GNU! We use GNU... ..do you?! Debian is the fastest growing GNU/Linux
    distro Posted by: IntnsRed on Thursday, January 29, 2004 - 12:14 AM. ...

    www.debianhelp.org/ modules.php?op=modload&name=News&file=article&sid= 3231
    - 47k - Cached - Similar pages

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  4. Most popular distroes... by rqqrtnb · · Score: 4, Informative

    You could get a feel for the number from

    http://counter.li.org/reports/machines.php

  5. Re:I'd think it's Knoppix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Knoppix is, of course, Really Debian.

  6. apt-get dist-upgrade by zonix · · Score: 2, Informative
    30 new packages installed, none removed and 2 held back.

    Emphasis mine.

    Then run an apt-get dist-upgrade. Perhaps there are some packages that need removal because of changed dependencies, etc. :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
  7. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by HuguesT · · Score: 0, Informative

    The article says it has been shrinking.

  8. Re:Definitely... by El · · Score: 5, Informative

    Selling 1 license last week and 2 licenses this week would be a 100% increase. Selling 0 licenses last week and 1 license this week is an infinite percentage increase. I hope you pay somebody else to compute your taxes...

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  9. Re:Stats by Doesn't_Comment_Code · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to DistroWatch.com, ranked by hits per day on their website:

    Mandrake 991
    Red Hat 696
    Knoppix 643
    Debian 567
    Fedora 518
    Gentoo 477
    SUSE 460
    Slackware 423

    and the list goes on and on

    Of course this is very limited sample and probably doesn't include any enterprise use.

    --

    Slashdot Syndrome: the sudden, extreme urge to correct someone in order to validate one's self.
  10. WBL by einer · · Score: 3, Informative

    White Box Linux. All of the functionality, security and stability of RHE3 without any expense.

    It also makes a snappy desktop distro with a 2.6 kernel. There are even apt-repositories if you're an apt-rpm type admin.

    It's not a desktop distro, on the other hand, I look forward to not having to crossing my fingers and praying that an upgrade works for another five years or so.

  11. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The article says it has had the slowest growth rate, not that it is shrinking.

    "RedHat has a far greater number of installations at 1.5 million, but a slower growth rate in the six-month span at 17.8 percent; "

    It is still growing, just not as fast as the other distros.

  12. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by Tango42 · · Score: 2, Informative

    It's growth rate has been shrinking, not it's absolute numbers.

  13. Re:Soldi article? Really? So where was Slackware t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Check out VectorLinux (based on Slackware)... lots of positive reviews.

  14. Don't forget... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Don't forget that as soon as it is installed in the hd it becomes debian.

    Knoppix is to debian the same thing that mandrake move is to mandrake or suse live to suse.

    Knoppix is great (and I really mean it) but you can't use it in a survey like this. Unless it is installed in the hard drive (and in that case it becomes debian) you can't count a new user because as soon as he removes the cd he isn't a knoppix user anymore, is he?

  15. Actually, Debian is pronounced "Deb ee n" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    From the Debian 'about' page:
    "Since many people have asked, Debian is pronounced 'deb ee n'. It comes from the names of the creator of Debian, Ian Murdock, and his wife, Debra."
    Here's the link: http://www.debian.org/intro/about.html
  16. Re:Debian discovers the wheel? by SoTuA · · Score: 2, Informative
    All Debian needs for the Sarge release (besides above and whatever they are also working on) is KDE 3.2

    Well, since KDE 3.2 is in woody already, I don't see how they could not include it in the official release of sarge as "stable".

  17. Basic Flaw by whoever57 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article ranks only Web servers. So it's hardly going to provide useful numbers on desktops.

    --
    The real "Libtards" are the Libertarians!
  18. Re:My vote is for: by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hm, well, Ian would be two syllables and pronounced "ee" as in Bee and "n" as in Sudden.

    It would probably be "deb-ee-n"
    No..?

  19. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by An+Anonymous+Hero · · Score: 4, Informative
    The article says it has had the slowest growth rate, not that it is shrinking.

    The article says: "RedHat has a far greater number of sites but a slower growth rate, and actually fell this month"

  20. It's Mandrake - No Doubt by terrencefw · · Score: 4, Informative

    I sell distros through my website, fastdiscs.com. I sell more copies of Mandrake GPL than all the other distros put together. It's quite phenomenal.

    Distro of the week though? MEPIS. Try it, it's fantastic!

    James

    --
    Like tinyurl, but one letter less! http://qurl.co.uk/
  21. Re:Debian discovers the wheel? by TKinias · · Score: 4, Informative

    scripsit SoTuA:

    Well, since KDE 3.2 is in woody already, I don't see how they could not include it in the official release of sarge as "stable".

    Actually it's not:

    apt-cache policy kdebase
    kdebase:
    Installed: (none)
    Candidate: 4:3.1.3-1
    Version Table:
    4:3.1.5-2 0
    90 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
    4:3.1.3-1 0
    500 http://ftp.de.debian.org testing/main Packages
    4:2.2.2-14.7 0
    500 http://ftp.de.debian.org stable/main Packages
    500 http://security.debian.org stable/updates/main Packages

    Note that Woody==Stable -- that's 2.2.2-14.7. Sarge (Testing) currently has 3.1.3-1, and Sid (Unstable) has 3.1.5-2.

    --
    In principio creauit Linus Linucem.
  22. Re:depends on what demographic by Fouquet · · Score: 3, Informative

    Certainly an important point! Many people in the US Astronomy community used RedHat in the past (those running linux that is... Solaris is still popular). However, people are being turned off by RedHat's policy change. We actually use Linux for productivity in a desktop environment, and need it to work without a lot of system admin. That essentially means:

    1) A distribution that installs 'out of the box' (ftp,nfs,etc) without a lot of tinkering and screwing around getting hardware setup.

    2) A distribution that provides bug patches and updates in a easy to use interface.

    3) Something that can easily be figured out from a user perspective and is not overly complicated. Many faculty are not the most savey of computer users. I know one who got a new laptop with Windows and couldn't figure it out. He had though been (and still is) using VMS since its beginning and understands that fine.

    I recently installed SuSE on my laptop and am quite pleased with it. I'll probably switch my other RedHat machines over to Suse in the near future.

    Just my 2-cents from a community that uses linux daily.

  23. Re:The fastest shrinking distro by Nihynjahs · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe for personal use, but fedora basically is redhat without th support is it not? My cousin just went and bought a magazine about linux cause he wanted to try it out (he doesnt get cable where he lives only 56k) but i think that stuff thats easy for people to obtain will help it grow, my cousin probably doesn even know how to burn a iso.. if peopel want to experince/ try out linux cause the realized MS sucks paying 80 dollars for suse or redhat at bestbuy may become a trend..

  24. Re:Better set a minimum size... by tverbeek · · Score: 3, Informative

    There always has to be at least one person having a dig at Hurd ;) Funny... except that by definition, GNU/HURD is not a Linux distro.

    --
    http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  25. Re:Soldi article? Really? So where was Slackware t by Alan+Hicks · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sad thing is, that slackware users are really a small number. Most have went to debian or gentoo.

    Where do you get off saying that? Personally I don't know a whole lot of former Slackware users who aren't of the "must try the new version of this or that distro as soon as it comes out" group. Yes, there are a lot of former Slackware users who now use Gentoo or Debian.

    Here's the shocker. I'll bet you they still use Slackware on some things.

    Here's another shocker. I know a lot of Slackware users who are former Debian or Gentoo users.

    --
    Slackware, what else when it must be secure, stable, and easy?
  26. Re:Well yes, that kind of happens by The+Analog+Kid · · Score: 5, Informative

    However the parent was talking about how Red Hat cut off half there customer because they stop producing a free downloadable and boxed set version of their operating system.(Which really was just draining money doing so, because the number buying it didn't outweigh the money involved in making it). Once they cut the dead weight, Red Hat is now actually turning a profit, and their stock has risen over 100% since. (Though that could just be do to them filing a lawsuit against SCO).

  27. Re:depends on what demographic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    You might want to have a look at Libranet. I do use Suse at work (have to), and one of my boxen at home is also still running it. The moment you do something to system settings without using Yast, their admin tool, you are in trouble, wether you immediately notice or not.
    I played around a little with Debian, which I liked, and then discovered Libranet. It`s Debian, but more userfriendly and with a nice admin interface. The good people there have their own update-archive and a pretty good forum community.
    www.libranet.com

  28. Re:Debian based by Crazy+Eight · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go here and grab the "mini.iso". It's only 3.2 MB and should get you everything you want.

  29. Re:Definitely... by Technician · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't forget they sold a license to Microsoft. It isn't an increase from zero. True it happened more than a week ago.

    My tinfoil hat theory is SCO doesn't intend to sell licenses. They were hired by Microsoft to price Free Software much higher than Windows as a move to kill the competition. Follow the money. How many copies do you think Microsoft is really running for 10 million dollars? At $699 per processor they have license for 14,306 processors. Who really believes they bought that many copies to run it in-house?

    Follow the money

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  30. Xandros, safe? Not according to this by da'covale · · Score: 5, Informative

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/35588.html But the real security problem in Xandros is precisely the Windows affliction: too many networking services are enabled by default.

    --
    da'covale d'Rie Bolmdahl
  31. Re:Better set a minimum size... by Reverend528 · · Score: 1, Informative

    HURD is the GNU kernel. Debian is Linux distro, hence not HURD.

  32. Re:What I don't understand about Debian by nestler · · Score: 4, Informative
    Debian has to support around a dozen different platforms. The excellent hardware detection in Knoppix is unfortunately x86 specific, so its not a drop-in replacement for what they need to have.

    The Debian people are rewriting their installer right now for the upcoming release. One of the big goals is improved auto-detection of hardware. I'm not sure if they are pulling things from Knoppix, but hopefully so for the x86 platform.

  33. Re:Stats by bfree · · Score: 2, Informative

    Take the above data from distrowatch, which is the average of the previous month and combine it with the averages from the previous 3, 6 and 12 months. Work out the change in average percentage share of the hits for each distro (well for those with clearly over 100 hits per month for the last 12 months) between 2-3 months ago and the previous month. Here's what you discover (sorted by biggest increase in share from 2-3 months ago to last month):

    Mark % 2 to 1 7 to 1
    Flonix 2.97% 59.47% 17.70%
    Buffalo 2.58% 49.08% 2.87%
    PCLinuxOS 7.27% 27.21% 2.22%
    MEPIS 4.51% 26.64% -4.00%
    XANDROS 5.00% 16.19% 95.64%
    Gnoppix 2.81% 16.04% 6.80%
    LindowsOS 3.18% 12.60% 24.19%
    Feather 1.89% 8.28% -13.34%
    Mandrake 14.31% 7.25% 20.58%
    KNOPPIX STD 2.93% 5.15% -14.80%
    Gentoo 6.95% -1.16% -18.72%
    Knoppix 9.39% -1.95% 25.68%
    Libranet 1.91% -3.28% -10.74%
    Debian 9.12% -5.83% 43.51%
    Slackware 5.71% -7.09% -8.03%
    Morphix 1.75% -16.94% -44.36%
    Lycoris 2.11% -18.73% -45.78%
    Suse 5.56% -23.22% -2.39%
    RedHat 6.83% -24.28% -34.38%
    Damn Small 3.20% -25.67% -20.66%
    God that table is ugly, sorry! It reads, distro, click share % for last month, increase in click share from 2-3 months ago to last month and increase in click share from 7-12 months ago to last month.

    Anything missing is either too new for distrowatches information to be useful (for example Fedora it claims has an average of 518/month whether you are talking over the past 12 months or 1) or else it fell foul of having under 100 hits somewhere (Yoper would have had far and away the biggest negative growth but it has dropped to only 63 hits).

    So fastest growing distro? You choose, if you just want the last months growth you have the list above, you want to compare it to 7 to 12 months ago, then its Xandros, Debian, Knoppix, Lindows, Mandrake (spot the trend).

    --

    Never underestimate the dark side of the Source

  34. Re:What I don't understand about Debian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    it is available now

    http://www.debian.org/devel/debian-installer/

    to those interesting in beta testing. I've heard good things about it already. I was going to try it out but that happened about the same time as the security breach so I wasn't able to download it before I got busy again.

    Download an image and try it out. I'm sure you'll find it amiable as some reviewers have already

    http://articles.linmagau.org/modules.php?op=modl oa d&name=Sections&file=index&req=viewarticle&artid=4 55&page=1

  35. small number? by junkgoof · · Score: 2, Informative

    I can remember buying distros back when downloads were slow (1996 or so), and the University of Toronto book store had Red Hat boxes stacked all over the place. They were all gone in a couple of weeks, too. Of course there were only so many stores that got boxes in any volume, but still, thousands of units (they were seriously piled up when they came in) in a couple of weeks.

    Of course they probably don't sell any retail boxes now. The few students who don't have broadband (networked dorms) probably get copies from those who do. Good revenue stream while it lasted.

    --
    You got me into this! You were the ideologue! I'm only a poor assassin! - Twenty evocations, Bruce Sterling