Slashdot Mirror


Digital Oscars Awarded

prostoalex writes "MSNBC covers the Academy's Scientific and Technical Awards, which generally take place before the Oscars, but recognize companies and individuals that helped the advancement of film-making with technology. This year's winners include DigiDesign, the creator of Pro Tools audio package, Bill Tondreau from Kuper Controls for robotic camera systems and Peter D. Parks, with a lifetime achievement award."

17 of 109 comments (clear)

  1. So how do you award folk by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 5, Funny

    in Hex or Binary?

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
    1. Re:So how do you award folk by c1ay · · Score: 3, Funny
      I nominate Darl McBride for the Tallest Tale of the year...

      --

    2. Re:So how do you award folk by Dukael_Mikakis · · Score: 3, Funny

      They don't get an Oscar ... they get an ASCII-char.

      Okay, horrible pun.

  2. Does software count? by Supp0rtLinux · · Score: 5, Informative

    Too bad they make no mention of the rendering software(s), etc. used in films like LOTR and ROTK. Many times its the softwares that drive the new hardware discoveries and advancements as was the case with the movie Titanic. And with all the Linux rendering farms being used these days, I'd expect at least some mention of the softwares powering them.

  3. Real Winners by PimpDaddie · · Score: 3, Funny

    We all know that the real winners were all the geeks that got to hang with Jennifer Garner for the night. Yuh!

  4. Where's McGiver? by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Funny

    He most certainly contributed to technology in films!

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  5. It is a shame by UnidentifiedCoward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It is a shame really that these people do not receive more recognition for their work. Their contribution is in some cases ground breaking. But since it is not "interesting" they do not get any air time.

    As anybody who uses Pro Tools will tell you, it is the end all be all when it comes to the audio spectrum. They defenitely deserved the recognition. And regardless of what you may think of LotR, you have to give props to the Massive project.

    Kudos to you.

    1. Re:It is a shame by dilvie · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I have used protools. I think they deserved that recognition in the mid 90's, when they were really doing new and innovative things, but the most of their recent cool developments have happenned in the control equipment, rather than the software itself -- hell, protools on OS X was starting to look like vaporware to many of us, it took them so long to get it working.

      In the mean-time, many other companies have done a lot of cool stuff in the audio industry that actually is new and innovative, especially in terms of software and equipment that costs less than $5k.

      Most of the really cool innovation has come from the price drops that have made it possible to build an entire movie production studio for less than $20k -- including everything you need to record, mix, and post produce audio, quality cameras, and affordable NLE software.

      Where is the mention of that? The garage studio revolution has arrived -- the key products in that revolution should be the ones recieving the awards this year... so where are they?

    2. Re:It is a shame by wasthere · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The problem with the credit is it can belong to more than just the people getting named.

      3 Fairlight Instruments guys got awards too. One of them, Chris Alfred carried on from the work I (and a Chris Prall) did, but we don't get a mention... and we started it..

      See:
      http://www.users.bigpond.com/adriansbruce/ tech/

  6. details by gearheadsmp · · Score: 4, Informative

    Among those honored with plaques were Kinoton GmbH for its high-speed studio projector; a team from Eastman Kodak Co. for developing an anti-static layer on film that survives processing; Stephen Regelous for developing Massive, the software used to create tens of thousands of warriors for the "Lord of the Rings" battle sequences; and a group of companies for their work in digital audio editing.

    Here it is, what little there is

  7. "Technology" does not necessarily mean "digital" by Nakito · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Filmmaking is technological by nature. Many filmmaking technologies are in the realms of mechanical engineering, optics, lighting, chemistry (e.g., film emulsions), model making, etc. I don't think it's very accurate to refer to the Academy Awards for technological achievements as the "Digital Oscars."

  8. why protools? by dilvie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Okay, digidesign has done some neat things recently, but the most notable are the cool digital control consoles that attach to software-based workstations.

    Digi was once widely recognized for building hardware that made mid-90's computers capable of audio feats that would not have been otherwise possible, but these days, there are a lot of other options, and protools is no longer an obvious choice over other software such as cubase sx, which has been very popular among smaller studios.

    I suppose the academy is really not very interested in the cool developments that have made it easier for the indie movie scene, such as the terrific, and very affordable Behringer Truth monitors, and small digital mixers that cost less than $2k, but sound better and buss signals easier than the $10k mixers of yester-year.

    I really think the coolest technical innovations in the movie and audio community recently have all been the ones that have made it easier to run a small studio out of your garage. I think that movement should be recognized a bit more by the academy.

    - Eric
  9. Henrik Wann Jensen by ankit · · Score: 5, Informative

    Henrik Wann Jensen (one of the winners) is a professor at UCSD. He has had numerous contributions to the area of Computer Graphics, including Photon Maps, Subsurface Scatterring, etc. Some of the animations and images of of his work are trully amazing.

    --
    Don't Panic
  10. Re:what about? by cindy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'm not sure about ILM, but Pixar (Ed Catmull in particular) has won at least one of these awards for Renderman. (2001)

  11. Corrections by fuzzy12345 · · Score: 4, Informative

    They ARE Oscars, just not the glitzy ones that the media covers. Sometimes software wins, sometimes hardware (e.g. innovative camera systems, mounts, sound equipment etcetera).

    --

    Everybody's a libertarian 'till their neighbour's becomes a crack house.
  12. I nominate the Star Wars Kid... by vicparedes · · Score: 5, Funny

    for Best Performance in an Online Feature.

  13. Because there are never enough Award shows.. by Dr.+Ion · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Seriously, is there any other industry that does as much back-patting and self-stroking as Hollywood?

    These are some seriously affirmation-hungry groups that just live for the moment to tell everyone "what a great opportunity it was to work with such a great professional" blah blah.

    Soon they're going to have a hard time fitting any new "content" in between the award shows.