Slashdot Mirror


Arthur C. Clarke Talks With The Onion

sootman writes "The Onion has an interview with Arthur C. Clarke in this week's issue. My favorite line: 'The asteroid [named after me] is number four thousand and something, and the International Astronomical Federation, which deals with these sorts of things and numbered it, apologized to me because number 2001 wasn't available, having been given to somebody named "A. Einstein."'" Reader ronys point out that Despite the source, the interview is not a spoof or satire."

114 of 375 comments (clear)

  1. Author's blog by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    The interviewer's blog can be found here, for what it's worth.

  2. Isn't he getting old? by TWX · · Score: 2, Funny

    2001: A Space Odyssey came out in 1968 if memory serves, isn't Clarke getting a bit old?

    Next they'll be conducting an interview with Philip K. Dick by Ouija Board. Not that this wouldn't be any weirder than The Three Stigmata of Palmer Eldritch or Radio Free Ablemuth...

    --
    Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    1. Re:Isn't he getting old? by icklemichael · · Score: 2, Informative

      2001: A Space Odyssey came out in 1968 if memory serves, isn't Clarke getting a bit old?

      I think he's nearly 90 now...

    2. Re:Isn't he getting old? by iamplupp · · Score: 5, Informative

      he was born december 16, 1917

    3. Re:Isn't he getting old? by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Funny
      Next they'll be conducting an interview with Philip K. Dick by Ouija Board.
      An interview with the dude who wrote the bible would be more intresting.
      What other SF book had such an inpact as the Bible?
    4. Re:Isn't he getting old? by hcduvall · · Score: 2, Insightful

      2001: A Space Odyssey came out in 1968 if memory serves, isn't Clarke getting a bit old?

      Um...so what?

    5. Re:Isn't he getting old? by Tetsugaku-San · · Score: 2, Funny

      yep late eighties if u'd read the article rather than trying to get first post :p

    6. Re:Isn't he getting old? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't you know? Elderly citizens must report to the fuel vats for decommissioning. Their energy must be returned to society.

      That's the real reason he moved to Sri Lanka.

    7. Re:Isn't he getting old? by Baron_Yam · · Score: 2, Informative

      No single person wrote the Bible, unless you take a strict view that God is the author because he 'inspired' the writings... in which case you have a God who, despite omniscience and omnipotence, can't write a book without filling it with contradictions.

      The Bible and its siblings are collections of stories, the older parts of which probably existed as oral tradition for quite some time before being recorded in written form.

    8. Re:Isn't he getting old? by TGK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think you missed the point. He's implying the Bible is a work of Science Fiction, not a legitimate religious document. He's indicating that a single author drafted it as a work of fiction largely as a practical joke on the rest of history.

      It's a theory with some holes, but one that's fun to needle the radical right with.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    9. Re:Isn't he getting old? by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

      It get's even funnier if you actually read it. It is so damn full of contradictions, silly advice and some stories that are so damn disturbing that I cannot see a good moral either way.

      Believe in whichever deity you want with my blessing, but anybody who takes the bible as their lead deserves to be laughed at.

      Behold now, I have two daughters which have not known man; let me, I pray you, bring them out unto you, and do ye to them as is good in your eyes (Genesis 19:8) Yeah, you go Lot!

      A more disgusting tale that is a bit long to quote here is Judges 19. Bottom line of the story is: A guy stays the night as a guest of another guy bringing his concubine instead. Now during the night some bullies from the city come to shake out the mistery guest, but the host will have none of that so he offers them his daughter and the guest's concubine. Anyway, the bullies didn't come for his daughter, but they take the concubine for good measure and they knew her, and abused her all the night until the morning. Well the poor lass dies but being a decent guy her master takes her home on a donkey. And when he was come into his house, he took a knife, and laid hold on his concubine, and divided her, together with her bones, into twelve pieces, and sent her into all the coasts of Israel.

      Yeah, I guess that's the decent thing to do under the circumstances. I wouldn't really know since I'm an atheist.

      Anyway, offered any bulls lately? Remember to burn it's innards. They're such a sweet savour unto the LORD (Leviticus 1:9 and pretty much the rest of the book)

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    10. Re:Isn't he getting old? by owlstead · · Score: 2, Funny

      In that case he is certainly not _getting_ old. Older maybe, but you are dead if you don't.

  3. Believe it or not by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The Onion does have real interviews and a pretty good AV section.

    The print edition is like a reverse newspaper, with the comic section everywhere and a small non-comic center pull-out.

    1. Re:Believe it or not by illuminatedwax · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, it's more like a comic beginning section, followed by a slightly larger Arts section with interviews, reviews of movies, books, and music, as well as picks of upcoming shows in the area (depending on where you get it). The AV section is usually bigger than the joke section, and is usually pretty excellent.

      --Stephen

      --
      Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  4. Re:small article nitpick by George+Michael · · Score: 4, Insightful

    When somebody's dead wrong, it's generally not a good idea to mod them up "Informative"... More like "Misinformative".

  5. Re:small article nitpick by Angstroem · · Score: 2, Informative
    It was the other way round. Asimov coined the term "Violence is the last refuse of the incompetent". They appeared in the Foundation trilogy and were IIRC spoken by the character Hari Seldon. The sentence "any sufficiently advanced..." can be found in "A day in the 21st century" by Athur C Clarke.

    Moderators, please do not wildly mod up stuff only because the first moderator made a mistake...

  6. Sufficiently advanced technology... by sbennett · · Score: 5, Funny

    he first created the popular axiom "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magick."

    Which of course leads to the corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."

    1. Re:Sufficiently advanced technology... by AllUsernamesAreGone · · Score: 5, Funny

      Or even the alternative observation from James Klass: "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo."

    2. Re:Sufficiently advanced technology... by tramm · · Score: 4, Interesting
      he first created the popular axiom "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magick." Which of course leads to the corollary: "Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced."
      To be pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clark's Law. The contrapositive is a rule of inference that allows you to reverse the consequent and antecedent: if P implies Q, then not Q implies not P.
      --
      -- http://www.swcp.com/~hudson/
    3. Re:Sufficiently advanced technology... by Noren · · Score: 5, Interesting
      To be much more pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clarke's Third Law(1973), the popular axiom to which the grandparent referred.

      Clarke's Law(1962), which was later renamed Clarke's First Law, reads:

      When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible, he is almost certainly right.
      When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong.
      It is perhaps relevant given the misattribution to Asimov earlier and the corollary reference of the grandparent to also mention Asimov' Corollary to Clarke's First Law (1978):
      When, however, the lay public rallies round an idea that is denounced by distinguished but elderly scientists and supports that idea with great fervor and emotion --
      the distinguished but elderly scientists are then, after all, probably right.
    4. Re:Sufficiently advanced technology... by saforrest · · Score: 2, Insightful

      To be pedantic, that is the contrapositive of Clark's Law. The contrapositive is a rule of inference that allows you to reverse the consequent and antecedent: if P implies Q, then not Q implies not P.

      To be pedantic myself, what was wrong with what the OP said? A corollary is a minor claim which is logically dependent on a previously-established claim.

      What particular rule of interference was used to deduce the corollary from the original statement isn't really important. There's nothing wrong with calling the contrapositive is a corollary.

  7. Re:small article nitpick by tommck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not incompetent, but I always throw my violence in the garbage too!

    Oh, you mean refuGe!... Nevermind...

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  8. Re:Going nuts? by dew-genen-ny · · Score: 3, Informative

    Seriously, who marked this as interesting?

    Since when has stephen hawking been nuts? physically disabled yes, nuts no.

    Or am I speaking out of my arse?

    --
    tom-george.comBecause geeks rate higher t
  9. There aren't many like him by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Too bad for us.

  10. Re:Going nuts? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Hawking thinks that humanity needs to genetically engineer ourselves to pre-emptively keep machines from taking us over.

    Here's the article

  11. Irrelevant by Marxist+Commentary · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Clark is fascinating despite his age - we should treasure the elderly, there is much knowledge there to be gained, but all too often we simply shuffle them to the side like a pair of worn shoes. Enjoy his insights while you still can. He has some fascinating opinions on Martian life, for example.

    1. Re:Irrelevant by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Interesting
      > Clark is fascinating despite his age - we should treasure the elderly, there is much knowledge there to be gained, but all too often we simply shuffle them to the side like a pair of worn shoes. Enjoy his insights while you still can.

      Amen to that.

      > He has some fascinating opinions on Martian life, for example.

      From the article: "Well, I think they've already found life. There's some pictures from the laboratories which seem to me to be unmistakably vegetation-leaves and stems and things. I don't see what else it could possibly be."

      But with all due respect, Sir Clarke, what pictures are these again? Fark photoshops don't count.

      His Dark Dune Spots look a lot more like some sort of outgassing (well, out-watering or out-CO2ing, which would in itself be interesting, but isn't proof of life) or wind-related phenomenon than trees.

      With the new orbiter, we should get some new data that could resolve this question.

    2. Re:Irrelevant by Tackhead · · Score: 2, Informative
      > Maybe he meant these?

      Yes, that's what he meant. You, I, and Sir Clarke are all talking about the same "Dark Dune Spot" phenomena.

  12. Re:IAU by eggstasy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The man is over 85 years old. Give him a break. I'm surprised he is still alive, let alone coherent.

  13. Re:No by Aardpig · · Score: 2, Informative

    Clarke was more famously known for his book "The Time Machine" than anything else.

    What, the same "The Time Machine" that was written by HG Wells?

    --
    Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  14. Re:Going nuts? by fireduck · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The first quote deals exclusively with Mars and whatever pictures Clarke has seen that appear to be vegetation. The second quote is more general about intelligent life in the universe and how we've seen signs of vegetative life on Mars.

    Where does one get the idea that he's talking about pictures of vegetation from some place other than Mars?

  15. Re:small article nitpick by scumbucket · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let's just mix and match:

    How about:

    "Any sufficently advanced violence is indistinguishable from magick."

    or

    "any sufficiently advanced technology is the last refuge of the incompetent"

    Or my personal favorite:

    "Any sufficiently advanced incompetent is indistinguishable from magick violence."

    Nice try at trolling, btw.

    --
    CMDRTACO CHECK YOUR EMAIL!
  16. Re:No by kzinti · · Score: 2, Funny

    What, the same "The Time Machine" that was written by HG Wells?

    Wells and Clarke are the same person. Clarke went back in time to write under a pseudonym.

  17. gotta agree by *weasel · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ACC: Well, I think they've already found life. There's some pictures from the laboratories which seem to me to be unmistakably vegetation--leaves and stems and things. I don't see what else it could possibly be.

    I almost wondered: did I miss a day of NASA releases where they casually announced that 'Oh, by the way... there's stuff growing on Mars'.

    I mean, I suppose it's possible that he was referring to debris that resembles decayed plant matter. I'd think anything decayed would be long-since so weather-worn and scattered that it couldn't possibly resemble plant-life at the macroscopic scale. Of course, IANABotonist or Geologist, so what the hell do I know?

    But hey, he is Arthur C Clarke, so maybe he's privvy to stuff that we aren't. Then again, he's Arthur C Clark - the guy who predicted the Kuwaiti oil fires would cause a nuclear winter-like effect and essentially cancel summer in the region. Thankfully that came nowhere near being true - though it certainly casts some doubts on his pontification.

    The second response though is geared solely toward intelligent life - so I don't know that he necessarily contradicted himself or anything.

    --
    // "Can't clowns and pirates just -try- to get along?"
    1. Re:gotta agree by CommieLib · · Score: 4, Informative

      The Kuwaiti Oil Fires / Nuclear Winter thing was Carl Sagan. Pretty much the entire nuclear winter thing has been discredited as pop / junk science at this point.

      Sagan was a MASTER science popularizer and spokesman, in the end, he wasn't a very good scientist.

      --
      If your bitterest enemies are people who hack the heads off civilians, then I would say you're doing something right.
    2. Re:gotta agree by rsidd · · Score: 5, Informative
      I almost wondered: did I miss a day of NASA releases where they casually announced that 'Oh, by the way... there's stuff growing on Mars'. I mean, I suppose it's possible that he was referring to debris that resembles decayed plant matter.

      I think he's talking about these images.

    3. Re:gotta agree by The+Grey+Mouser · · Score: 2, Insightful


      I remember ages ago reading an EXTREMELY unflattering interview with ACC where the reviewer came away hinting (broadly) that he was a self-obsessed has-been. Looking at the onion article and seeing some of the stuff he does (name-dropping Kubrick, deciding the most important recent invention was something he predicted (satellite)


      Given his close and productive relationship with Kubrick, I think one could hardly call this name-dropping (they were known to be close personal friends). Also, he didn't "predict" the communications satellite, but did in fact invent it; hardly misplaced pride in this case.


      I've lost a lot of the vast respect I used to have for ACC (and that's not even mentioning the - unproven - allegations about the young boys surrounding him)


      I hadn't heard that; but given that the allegations are unproven, perhaps the man has earned the benefit of the doubt.

      Mouser

    4. Re:gotta agree by The+Grey+Mouser · · Score: 3, Interesting


      The Kuwaiti Oil Fires / Nuclear Winter thing was Carl Sagan. Pretty much the entire nuclear winter thing has been discredited as pop / junk science at this point.


      I've seen no credible refutation of the Nuclear Winter hypothesis, and would be interested to see any references you may have on this point. Conflating this with the Kuwaiti Oil Fires merely clouds the issue, if you'll forgive the expression. Junk science? I think that remains to be seen (hopefully not anytime soon...)


      Sagan was a MASTER science popularizer and spokesman, in the end, he wasn't a very good scientist.


      He was a highly-regarded planetary scientist, though it is true that he was more of a bureaucrat for the latter part of his career. Most of his work was done in large collaborations, but that can hardly be held against him.

      Cheers,

      Mouser

  18. Clarke, Shmarke.. by Channard · · Score: 4, Funny

    I pity the fool who doesn't name an asteroid after one of The Onion's previous interviewees, Mr T.

  19. Re:small nitpick about your comment by Vilim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually Asimov was the one who said (through one of his charecters) "Violence is the last REFUGE of the incompetent" (emphasis mine to point out the fact that you misquoted him.

    It was Salvor Hardins' motto throughout the Foundation Series (by Isaac Asimov). The Foundation series was among the best Science Fiction I have ever read (although Childhoods End still retains the top spot).

    --
    History will be kind to me, for I intend to write it - Sir Winston Churchill
  20. Re:small article nitpick by Unknown+Kadath · · Score: 4, Informative

    Asimov coined the term "Violence is the last refuse of the incompetent". They appeared in the Foundation trilogy and were IIRC spoken by the character Hari Seldon.

    Not Hari Seldon. Salvor Hardin, Mayor of Terminus.

    -Carolyn

    --
    Like Daddy always said: if you can't dazzle 'em with brilliance, baffle 'em with bullshit.
  21. You know you're both old and famous when... by darnok · · Score: 5, Funny

    you've written two autobiographies

  22. Re:Vegitation by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    maybe NASA vexed him in some way, and it's his way of getting his revenge, by getting the tin-foily sci-fi crowd to endlessly send FOIA requests for the Mars vegetation photos...

    "We know you have those veggie Mars photos! Dont lie to us! Arthur C. Clark *saw* them!"

  23. Maybe I shouldn't go back to Oregon... by Leto-II · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Was I the only one who noticed this little quote?

    Incidentally, have you heard about the discovery of the largest living creature on Earth? Would you believe it's two or three miles across, and probably several thousand years old, and still growing? It's this fungus that's eating Oregon. It's a single creature. I'm not quite sure how that's determined.

    Does anyone know WTF he is talking about here? Before I came back to China last year I didn't seem to remember my fellow Oregonians running away in fear from the killer fungus...

    --
    Do not anger the worm.
    1. Re:Maybe I shouldn't go back to Oregon... by Bombcar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Google for the humongous fungus

      Here's one story. It is big, and it doesn't move.

    2. Re:Maybe I shouldn't go back to Oregon... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
      These may be of some interest:

      Link 1

      Link 2

      Link 3

      Hope they help.

    3. Re:Maybe I shouldn't go back to Oregon... by buddahboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Google for the humongous fungus
      I don't think anyone with a fondness for the english language could fail to appreciae that sentence....

    4. Re:Maybe I shouldn't go back to Oregon... by Mangal · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fungi, live plants, have "indeterminant growth"- this means they do not have a maximum size or age that they reach and maintain; instead, they grow until they run out of resources or can't maintain their bulk anymore. Even then, they may just lop off body parts and start over from that point OR fragment into multiple bodies, each capable of growing independently of the others. The giant fungus in Oregon (and the one in Michigan's UP, and the others we haven't found yet or have forgotten about) is UNDERGROUND (except for the occasional fruiting body), and isn't eating "the state of Oregon"- it's gathering resources from dead/decaying matter. Decomposition makes the world go round.

      --
      I'm not just being paranoid- I've seen the data.
  24. Re:Giant Fungus?? by pertinax18 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Nevermind, I am amazingly stupid, it was the FIRST result from google when searching for "largest living creature earth fungus oregon"

    http://www.extremescience.com/biggestlivingthing.h tm

  25. vegetaiton statement by VAXcat · · Score: 4, Informative

    http://www.chez.com/lesovnis/htm/marsveg01.htm

    --
    There is no God, and Dirac is his prophet.
  26. Would that make Windows... by blorg · · Score: 4, Funny

    Black magic? Its behaviour is certainly often incomprehensible.

  27. Fungus Eating Oregon by airConditionedGypsy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    In the article, Clarke mentions the "largest living creature" to be a fungus two or three miles across "eating Oregon."

    His word choice leads one to envision doom and death, and I was sufficiently motiviated to search for more info on this beastie.

    http://www.harpers.org/Oregon.html

    http://www.newhouse.com/archive/story1b080700.html

    Google search gets you more.

    on another topic: Anyone amazed at how many quotes this guy has stored up in his head?

    --
    I bootleg Fizzy Lifting Drinks.
  28. Great Quote from the Article by jsonic · · Score: 5, Interesting
    O: Another favorite quote you tend to bring up in interviews is, "If there are any gods whose chief concern is man, they can't be very important gods." Can you expound on that?

    ACC: [Laughs.] Well, I was rather a cynic once. But now I've combined all my beliefs into this phrase I've been circulating: "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." It's adapted from a phrase by the British writer and scientist Richard Dawkins, who said that religion was a mind virus, an idea that infected the mind. He said that not all mind-viruses are malignant; some may even be beneficial. But many are harmful--racist theories, for instance.

    1. Re:Great Quote from the Article by indianajones428 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about this one?

      "I'm very fond of the quote--I don't know who said it first--'The best proof that there's intelligent life in the universe is that it hasn't come here.'"

      Arthur C. Cleark quoting Bill Watterson....

      Very cool.

      --
      When a thing has been said, and said well, have no scruple. Take it and copy it. --Anatole France
    2. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Your logic is flawed. Clarke says "religion is the most malevolent mind virus". That statement says nothing about secular humanism.

      The previous poster's logic *is* flawed, but he makes the same mistake that you do: differentiating between secular humanism and religion. As religion does not necessarily require belief in the supernatural, secular humanism fits the definition (or "at least one" definition) of religion. (Maybe Clarke meant "belief in the supernatural" when he said "religion", but that wouldn't be very intellectually honest.)

      Clarke's statement could be interpreted as a condemnation of zealous devotion to anything at all, but as someone who is zealously devoted to a number of different things, I don't prefer that view.

      Instead, I interpret Clarke's statement as a criticism of lack of critical thinking. People often believe things for bad reasons, and it's no excuse if some of those things happen to be true. Phrased like that, I might agree; it's quite possible that bad decision-making has the most harmful influence on humanity.

    3. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Bertie · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Actually, I'm surprised at him, really. He goes on about "religious wars, the Inquisition, the Crusades" as justification for his point. I'd expect a man of his intelligence and insight to realise that if man hadn't used religion as an excuse for this despicable behaviour, we'd have used something else instead. It's not religion, Arthur, it's one set of people perceiving themselves as different from (and by implication superior to) another, and it's a story as old as time. I'm a bit disappointed that he's taken such a simplistic viewpoint on the matter.

    4. Re:Great Quote from the Article by drudd · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I don't think that he took an overly simplistic viewpoint... he mentions racism as another example of a "mind virus," so it seems to me that he's blaming such conflicts on exactly the type of segregationist thinking that you mention. A mind virus would naturally play to the desires of its host, i.e. the idea that one is superior to everyone else, otherwise it could never propagate.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    5. Re:Great Quote from the Article by brucmack · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's different because it shifts accountability onto others. Being able to say "God told me to" makes it God's fault, whereas other excuses invariably come back to humans at some point.

    6. Re:Great Quote from the Article by pubjames · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Arthur, it's one set of people perceiving themselves as different from (and by implication superior to) another

      Yes, but the problem is that nearly all religions actually encourage people to perceive themselves as different, or superior, if they belong to that religion.

      if man hadn't used religion as an excuse for this despicable behaviour, we'd have used something else instead.

      Really? So the Crusades, for instance, would have still happened if there wasn't a religious basis for it? I doubt it very much.

    7. Re:Great Quote from the Article by KodaK · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I seriously doubt he has such a simplistic view of it. He's doing a light interview and it was an offhand comment. I'm sure when we all get as old as he is we'll have little patience for rattling off the same crap over and over for a new audience of noobs.

      --
      --J(K) DOS is like Unix in exactly the same way that a pinto is like an aircraft carrier.
    8. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Christ-on-a-bike · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Bad argument. From 'religionists cause wars' we cannot infer 'atheists cause no wars'.

      Of course, there are some evil atheists. But the 'people will find an excuse' argument is just weak. You might as well defend racist beliefs on the basis that 'Southerners would have found an excuse to string up black people anyway'.

      Religion, in general, is a system of false beliefs that cause people to behave badly. Just like racism. EOT

    9. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Well national socialism (as I guess you're referring too) wasn't just a political view. A belief in the manifest destiny of the arian race and the natural superiority of that race made it a lot more akin to a religion.

      I can't look at "Triumph des Willens" (Triumph of the Will) without seeing a religious gathering rather than a political one.
      I'm not trying to equate modern day, mainstream religion with naziism, but calling nazis atheists doesn't really fly either, and the deeper religion (and the feeling of being righteous whatever you do) goes, the scarier the comparison becomes.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    10. Re:Great Quote from the Article by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Insightful
      And you might as well absolve Christianity of all blame for the Crusades by claiming that the popes who ordered them weren't Christians, either.

      Hell, by your definition Christianity is probably the smallest religion that ever existed.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
    11. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Mac+Degger · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "...does not necessarily require belief in the supernatural..."

      Uh, sorry? Could you expound on that? I'd think that religion by definition deals with something beyond the natural. Unless of course you take the view that this 'god' thing is natural, and therefore is not supernatural or whatever. Even zen (the only religion I'm aware of lacking a god) is supernatural, in that the final attainable state is beyond this earth (although of course a taoist would say tht it is the ultimate acheivable form of nature).

      Anyway, you are missing the obvious here: maybe mister Clarcke means /exactly/ what he is quoted as saying: religion is ultimately a very bad thing, when it's good and bad points are balanced.

      --
      -- Waht? Tehr's a preveiw buottn?
    12. Re:Great Quote from the Article by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I did. It's not.

      To quote from the Council for Secular Humanism:

      "Critics often try to classify secular humanism as a religion. Yet secular humanism lacks essential characteristics of a religion, including belief in a deity and an accompanying transcendent order. Secular humanists contend that issues concerning ethics, appropriate social and legal conduct, and the methodologies of science are philosophical and are not part of the domain of religion, which deals with the supernatural, mystical and transcendent."

    13. Re:Great Quote from the Article by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Just out of interest, what is required in terms of belief in order for something to be categorized as a religion, rather than simply a belief about the world?

    14. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Bromrrrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well it depends on how you define 'crusade' ofcourse. I'd be hard pressed to call the Norman conquest of England a crusade, even though they must have surely prayed a lot.

      Fact is, in medieval times every leader and his uncle were aching to get their hands on more land. That some of the ensuing batles pitted christian against muslem hardly qualifies those battles as crusades.

      The 'christian' crusades however, were pretty different in that they were VERY definitely about religion.

      I don't blame modern christians for crimes of the past, but I don't look kindly on even a hint of excuses. The crusades were evil, period! Saying 'others did it too' doesn't change that.

      --

      What a rotten party, have we run out of beer or something?
    15. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Peter+La+Casse · · Score: 2
      I suppose that it depends on who is doing the categorizing. I don't know, myself; it's a complicated thing.

      One online dictionary lists this as one of the definitions of religion: "A cause, principle, or activity pursued with zeal or conscientious devotion."

      So perhaps it is not just the belief, but what one does with it, that makes a religion. That can't be the whole story, though, because lots of people don't do anything about their "religious" beliefs.

    16. Re:Great Quote from the Article by michaelhood · · Score: 4, Informative

      No, Hitler was not a Christian. Quick google for Hitler Christian turned up a plethora of links telling otherwise. Mods, please verify facts before modding things like this up. I forfeit my ability to mod this story so that I could post a proper rebuttal to this. Corrections should be made.

    17. Re:Great Quote from the Article by lga · · Score: 2, Interesting
      And you might as well absolve Christianity of all blame for the Crusades by claiming that the popes who ordered them weren't Christians, either.

      It doesn't matter if the popes who ordered the crusades were Christian or not - what happened was done in the name of Christianity and God and as a Christian I am ashamed of it.

      However, a lot of things done in the name of Christians are just using the nearest excuse and have little to do with religion.
    18. Re:Great Quote from the Article by Trailwalker · · Score: 2, Informative

      The Crusades used religion as an excuse for looting, pillaging, and land grabs. A major goal was the seizing of lands by younger and non-inheriting members of the nobility. As much effort went into fighting and looting christian states as muslim. Constantinople, the Christian citys of costal Anatolia suffered from the invasion of the European barbarians. When Jerusalem fell, resident Christians, Jews, and Muslims were slaughtered indiscriminately. Without religion, another excuse would have been found for the invasion of a preceivced weaker area.

    19. Re:Great Quote from the Article by grammaticaster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Oh please.

      A group can define itself as anything it wants. A lot of religions don't consider themselves "religions." A google search for "is not a religion" turns up pages that say:

      1. Christianity is not a religion.
      2. Buddhism is not a religion.
      3. Scientology is not a religion.
      4. Ahimsa is not a relgion.
      5. Hinduism is not a religion.

      et c., for Creationism, evolution(ism, I guess), Ba'Hai, Wicca, Yoga, Zen Buddhism, Falun Gong, and Alcoholics Anonymous -- just to use the first two pages of results. So, you're going to have to do better than to say that Secular Humanism doesn't consider itself a religion to prove that it's not.

    20. Re:Great Quote from the Article by transient · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And to make matters worse, it's not God's fault because God is faultless.

      --

      irb(main):001:0>
    21. Re:Great Quote from the Article by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or about 90% of New Zealand when it comes to Rugby...

    22. Re:Great Quote from the Article by brucmack · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Exactly, so the system just drives the thought process in circles.

      The way I see it, there are two basic types of wars... The first type is where you kill the other people for the sake of taking what they have. The second is killing for the sake of ridding the world of a certain kind of people. I think that religion has little influence on the first kind, but much influence on the second kind. People aren't automatically racist and hateful at birth, in fact children are usually the best at getting along regardless of race. So it's the belief system that shapes those things, and religion is usually at the core.

  29. 20{01,10} by pergamon · · Score: 4, Funny
    O: Have you seen the movie recently at all?

    ACC: No. I want to look at it again, and also 2010, which I did with [director] Peter Hyams, and which was also quite good. I can't remember when I did last see it.


    What's his address? I'll mail him the damn DVDs.
    1. Re:20{01,10} by jcoleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      For the love of Bowman, be sure that the DVDs have the right region encoding.

  30. The 2,200 Acre Thousand Year Old Oregonian Fungus by blorg · · Score: 5, Informative
    Incidentally, have you heard about the discovery of the largest living creature on Earth? Would you believe it's two or three miles across, and probably several thousand years old, and still growing? It's this fungus that's eating Oregon. It's a single creature. I'm not quite sure how that's determined.

    I did a double take on this one too, but he seems to have his facts straight.

  31. Re:IAU by rsidd · · Score: 2
    what part of "benefit of the doubt" are you incapable of grasping?

    What part of that phrase did you use in your original post? You said maybe he "misspoke" or the reporter "screwed up the transcription", but whatever, it seemed to upset you. If you're so nitpicky, expect others to nitpick you too.

  32. Vegitation Photos Link by FlashBIOS · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Here is a link to the vegitation photos that he seems to be talking about. It also includes a breif description of what it might be

    My questions is, why hasn't this been bigger news? Did it come out and I just missed it?

  33. Re:So this is it, he has finally lost it? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've met people involved with leaves and stems and things that seemed a bit odd, but knew an awful lot about hydroponics.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  34. A really good book of Clarke's by gosand · · Score: 4, Informative

    I highly recommend his book "Greetings, Carbon Based Bipeds", which is a collection of his various writings. Very entertaining reading, especially when you consider the timeframe when some of them were written. (1934-1998) You can pick it up for next to nothing .

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

    1. Re:A really good book of Clarke's by ZipR · · Score: 2, Informative

      Profiles of the Future is also a very good book. Some of it is a bit dated (last revised in 1984), but a lot of his logic in arriving at the profiles is still very relevant today.

  35. Onion A.V. Club Interview Collection by FilmJr · · Score: 5, Informative

    This may well have already been mentioned but... The Onion A.V. Club (the serious side of the operation) published a collection of interviews similar to the Arthur Clarke one. Book is called THE TENACITY OF A COCKROACH and includes conversations with other pop culture movers & shakers like Harlan Ellison, Chuck Jones, and George Romero. Jr.

  36. ACC's Mail collection address by reality-bytes · · Score: 4, Informative

    Arthur C Clarke.
    25, Barnes Place,
    Colombo 7,
    Sri Lanka.


    That should be sufficient to get the item eventually received by him; I'd guess that "Colombo 7" is actually a postal/zip code.

    --
    Ripping an new rectum in the fabric of spacetime.
    1. Re:ACC's Mail collection address by lakeland · · Score: 2, Informative

      DVD region is 5.

      An odd code, which seems to span three continents but only include poorer countries. I wonder if they're trying to avoid piracy by keeping all the poorer countries in the same region?

      Given the difficuilty of buying region 5 encoded DVDs, you might be better removing the region coding and remastering it unencrypted.

  37. Re:small article nitpick by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Any sufficiently advanced incompetent is indistinguishable from magick violence."

    And there, in a nutshell, lies U.S. foreign policy.

    --

    --
    I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  38. Re:What is your fucking point by Scaba · · Score: 4, Informative

    The book was not made into a movie, as such. Clarke wrote the book while writing the screenplay, which was based on both Clarke's and Kubrick's ideas.

  39. AV Club Interviews by May+Kasahara · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yeah, and the interviews are usually excellent. Even if they're interviewing someone I have little interest in (like Amy Sedaris or The RZA), I'll still read it, because I know it'll be interesting. The A.V. Club's reviews are usually pretty good too, though their "Films That Time Forgot" sometimes get thematic from week to week.

  40. A few real Arthur C. Clarke Quotations by stuffduff · · Score: 5, Informative

    CNN is one of the participants in the war. I have a fantasy where Ted Turner is elected president but refuses because he doesn't want to give up power.

    If an elderly but distinguished scientist says that something is possible he is almost certainly right, but if he says that it is impossible he is very probably wrong.

    It has yet to be proven that intelligence has any survival value.

    Politicians should read science fiction, not westerns and detective stories.

    The best measure of a man's honesty isn't his income tax return. It's the zero adjust on his bathroom scale.

    There is hopeful symbolism in the fact that flags do not wave in a vacuum.

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic.

    The only way to discover the limits of the possible is to go beyond them into the impossible.

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
    1. Re:A few real Arthur C. Clarke Quotations by cybergrue · · Score: 4, Funny

      Clark has his own set of laws, most of which you have mentioned. He reportably created the first three because Isaac Asimov had three, however over time, a 4th has been added. ACC Laws
      1) "When a distinguished but elderly scientist states that something is possible he is almost certainly right. When he states that something is impossible, he is very probably wrong."
      2) "The only way of discovering the limits of the possible is to venture a little way past them into the impossible."
      3) "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic."
      69th) "Reading computer manuals without the hardware is as frustrating as reading sex manuals without the software."

    2. Re:A few real Arthur C. Clarke Quotations by jnicholson · · Score: 2, Funny

      70) ??? 71) Profit!

      --
      "Do not drill any holes in your cat - it will not like it."
      -- Nick Davies
  41. Re:What is your fucking point by jbrader · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The way that I seem to remember it is Clarke wrote the novel and Kubrick wrote the screenplay of a story that they collaberated on. Though there are major plot differences. In fact I remember reading once that Clarke said he wouldn't touch screenwriting with a bargepole (too technical)

    --
    You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.
  42. Film Adaptation of "Fountains of Paradise"? by liftwatch · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was particularly interested in the last couple of paragraphs, regarding a possible film adaptation of Fountains of Paradise, and the fact that Clarke considers that his best/favourite novel.

    Fountains was the first novel to incorporate the modern concept of a space elevator.

    Anyone heard anything else about this news item?

    Personally, I'm hoping for Steven Spielberg. He did a terrific job on Minority Report. Between that, AI, and Taken, he's definitely on a sci-fi roll lately.

    1. Re:Film Adaptation of "Fountains of Paradise"? by One+Louder · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Personally, I'm hoping for Steven Spielberg. He did a terrific job on Minority Report. Between that, AI, and Taken, he's definitely on a sci-fi roll lately.
      Spielberg's always been doing sci-fi - however, unlike his earlier optimistic films (Close Encounters, ET), the more recent ones (Minority Report, AI) have taken a decidedly dystopian direction.

      The question is whether or not he's doing this to be considered more "serious" as a filmmaker, or if he's just becoming cynical and curmudgeonly in his elder years.

  43. Re:Going nuts? by CheeseTroll · · Score: 2, Insightful
    doesn't that seem a little fishy?

    He didn't say anything about fish, actually. Stop putting words in the man's mouth. :-)

    But seriously, that statement did strike me as an odd bit of wishful thinking overpowering his otherwise healthy sense of skepticism. Jumping to grand conclusions based on sketchy facts is the kind of thing that leads to crusades, inquisitions, and other deplorable acts he attributes solely to religion.

    Nevertheless, you've gotta cut some slack for people who dare to use their imagination. So what if they're wrong much of the time? They're also right, occasionally, and in ways nobody else could have envisioned.

    --
    A post a day keeps productivity at bay.
  44. Re:Going nuts? by fenix+down · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Sounds like about the kind of thing you'd say if you had a genetic disease that forced you to live in a robot chair.

  45. Re:Vegitation by Spad · · Score: 3, Informative

    These are probably the images he's referring to.

  46. 101 reasons to explore Mars by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mars is the Dalmation Planet!

  47. Re:Going nuts? by linoleo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Hawking thinks that humanity needs to genetically engineer ourselves to pre-emptively keep machines from taking us over.

    Well then, call me nuts, too, but I think this is actually a pretty inevitable conclusion once you start thinking of the big picture - say, developments over the next 1000 years or more. Hawkins may be disingenuous in going public with such long-range thoughts, but they are actually very well-founded.

    --
    Be faithful to your obsessions. Identify them and be faithful to them, let them guide you like a sleepwalker. JG Ballard
  48. Clarke's short story (postcard) on chess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    I discovered this short story by Clarke through a previous /. posting concerning chess. I really enjoyed it so here it is again.

    Btw, I remember in that posting someone saying there are more possible games of chess than atom's in the universe. How is that possible? And how do you calculate # of games, with pieces moving back and forth ad infinitum?

  49. Re:What is your fucking point by Charvak · · Score: 2, Informative

    In the book the monolith was on Iaeptus(sp?), moon of saturn in the movie it was on the moon of jupiter.

  50. Lest we forget Sierra's Rama game by OgdEnigmaX · · Score: 2, Informative

    Sierra released a Myst-like adventure game based on the Rama series in 1997. I think I might still have my copy in a box somewhere...it was pretty good and pleasingly mindbending, IIRC. Included an interview with Clarke and Gentry Lee to boot. Having only read _Garden of Rama_ and _Rama Revealed_ I can't say how well it adapted _Rendezvous_ or _Rama II_, but Sierra's version was certainly recognizable to me.

  51. No giant fungus out my window by PIPBoy3000 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well, I'm here in Oregon and I'd like to reassure everyone that there's no giant fungus gobbling up cities left and right. It's a bit of a stretch to call it a single giant organism. Think of it as a single mutated fungus that was particularly successful and kept reproducing as a giant mat of intertwined fungal fibers. It does a poor job at creating spores and spreading with the wind, but seems to do quite well at slowly expanding under the soil.

  52. Re:Experience, good for anything! by visgoth · · Score: 2, Funny
    Ah, but the real-life stories they can tell you can have real-life lessons. You figure them out.

    Time for the Obligatory Simpsons Quote!

    Abe Simpson: I needed a new heel for my shoe, so, I decided to go to Morganville, which is what they called Shelbyville in those days. So I tied an onion to my belt, which was the style at the time. Now, to take the ferry cost a nickel, and in those days, nickels had pictures of bumblebees on 'em. 'Give me five bees for a quarter,' you'd say.

    Now where were we? Oh yeah - the important thing was I had an onion on my belt, which was the style at the time. They didn't have white onions because of the war. The only thing you could get was those big yellow ones...

    --
    My patience is infinite, my time is not.
  53. Re:What is your fucking point by Lucidus · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just for the sake of nit-picking accuracy:

    Both the book and the movie were based on Clarke's short story "The Sentinel," originally published in 1950, wherein a monolith is discovered on the Moon.

    The front cover of the novel "2001: a space odyssey" states that it was "based on the screenplay of the MGM film by Stanley Kubrick and Arthur C. Clarke."

  54. Clarks life on mars pics. by incom · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  55. Slight nitpick... by CanSpice · · Score: 2, Informative

    The International Astronomical Union's Minor Planet Center deals with naming asteroids, not the International Astronomical Federation. As far as I'm aware, there's no such thing as the IAF.

  56. Re:IAU by mcpkaaos · · Score: 2, Funny

    And here I thought the comic book store owner on the Simpsons was only an animated character.

    --
    It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
  57. Re:Specialization by identity0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's probobly because they mistook it for another giant slug ;) Or maybe they thought it was Tonya Harding...

  58. Not the CIA by ajs · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Clarke goes into the idea behind his book about Fermat's Theorem, and while I like the idea, he should change the CIA to the NSA in the book. The CIA deals with crypto quite a bit, but the worlds largest employer of mathemeticians (or so I have heard them called) would be far more likely to scoop up someone who made a breakthrough in prime number theory: the NSA.

    It just seems they would make much more sense for his book.

  59. Re:small article nitpick by STrinity · · Score: 4, Funny

    I always liked H. Beam Piper's variation -- Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent because only the incompetent wait that long to use violence.

    --
    Les Miserables Volume 1 now up with my reading of
  60. The "mind virus" of science caused Hiroshima by rolofft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Power and riches were the basis for the crusades, like all wars. Religion was a pretext. France made preemptive strikes against Arab encroachers who had already conquered Spain. It was as much about religion as W's war was about WMD.

    --

    "Give a man a fish and he will ask for tartar sauce and French fries!"

  61. It's refreshing to see someone speak their mind. by pocopoco · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Favorite quote from the interview: "Religion is the most malevolent of all mind viruses." Awesome, none of this idiotic, politically correct, don't-say-what-you're-thinking crap for Clarke. I was all set to write the Brits off as total losers - we recently had articles with them trying to get people to stop using the terms boyfriend/girlfriend and then tring to ban a video game for having animal violence (what's next, ban Looney Tunes?) - pretty much as far from this free thinking fellow as possible. Then again the interview also said he doesn't have any interest in returning to England...maybe we should all just write US, UK, and company off as old fogeys that are only getting worse and more restrictive rather than the innovative places they used to be.