Slashdot Mirror


A Peek At Script Kiddie Culture

Brian Bruns writes "NewsForge is covering an article on the Script Kiddie Culture, in an interview with my co-admin Andrew Kirch. It provides insight into a culture that not many people fully understand, or get to see."

37 of 470 comments (clear)

  1. addendum to topic paragraph by cmacmanus · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..or want to see.

    1. Re:addendum to topic paragraph by poptix_work · · Score: 5, Funny

      No kidding, both Brian Bruns and Andrew (trelane on IRC) are script kiddies furiously trying to display a white hat.

      If in doubt, search google. This "SOSDG" is hosted on someones cable modem, yet claims to run DNSBL's used by "Hundreds of government sites including .mil and .gov"

      In conclusion, I have my own IRC logs:

      [28/1806] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] packeting an NYPD officer, have you no patriotism?
      [28/1809] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] you're a whore for packeting sigdie resources, and a terrorist for packeting an NYPD officer's COLOC, treason is punishable by execution still isn't it?
      [28/1812] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] terrorist.
      [28/1812] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] packetmonkey
      [28/1812] [msg(trelane)] this is great stuff, keep spewing
      [28/1812] [msg(trelane)] funny stuff
      [28/1812] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] fuck you for dos'ing my equipment last night btw
      [28/1814] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] you're a fat ugly spunkmonkey for packeting an RBL
      [28/1814] [trelane(trelane@adsl-68-78-10-171.dsl.ipltin.amer itech.net)] you realize the feds are giving us madhelp after the shit from this fall?

      (Despite their rantings, they can only hop on IRC and point fingers when their cable modem gets attacked)

      --
      Just because you disagree doesn't make it offtopic or flamebait.
  2. not many people fully understand, or get to see.. by chrispycreeme · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...or care about.

  3. How is this a 'culture'? by Gothmolly · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Are people looking for some Gibson-esque secret cabal of script kiddies, who are building operating systems at age 8, can speak in hex, and have secret h4X0r access to everywhere?
    I think people watch too many movies. Or is defining 'script kiddies' as a culture an attempt to rationalize the level of ignorance we experience when trying to comprehend all of computing technology? Since nobody can be good at everything, is it a mental safety valve to create uber-computer users, who 'get it', who can do 'cool things', who are 'in the know'? Isn't this the same thing as creating Gods to explain otherwise unknown natural phenomena?

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
    1. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by H1r0Pr0tag0n1st · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a culture in the same way that it is a culture if I scrape crud off the toilet and throw it in a petri dish with some growth media....

      --
      Americans could not be more self absorbed if they were made of equal parts water and paper towel. -Dennis Miller
    2. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I thought the script kiddies were the ones that didn't do any more cracking than search/download/copy-and-paste?

      The people who actually know what they're doing are much more dangerous, generally on the grey to white side of the law and don't bother with DDOS on somebody's little website, since if they really wanted to, they'd just take entire nations' Internet access down.

      I mean, I could think of a 1/2 dozen ways to wipe out a whole country's internet access completely for a day or two (no, I'm not going into details here, but if use BGP in your work life, you can probably think of a few also), but most people who've spent the time to learn at that level also are mature enough to realize that there isn't much of a point to wanton destruction.

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    3. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Given that there are always a considerable number of individuals at this 'level of ignorance', and that they associate with one another on a regular basis, I would call it a culture. Just because this 'script kiddie level' is merely a stepping stone to greater understanding of technology does not mean it, as just a snapshot of one point in this progression, is not worthy of being a culture in and of itself. After all, like other cultures of this kind (gaming, geek, fratboy, whatever) there are new script kiddies joining and old script kiddies retiring from it each day.

      Also, if you've ever associated with them, script kiddies have their own rules (mostly unspoken), trends, and even something of their own language. It may all be borne of ignorance and immaturity, but the same could be said about a number of other cultures/subcultures.

    4. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I thought the script kiddies were the ones that didn't do any more cracking than search/download/copy-and-paste?

      The script kiddies we're talking about are those who are copy-and-pasting 0day hacks. A hack that the White Hats don't know about yet, and even most black hats don't know about yet. The big mysterious question: Just how did these kids get into the web-of-trust it takes to have this tool before the "good guys" do?

      Afterall, the first "good guy" who gets this tool will hand it over to the white hat experts who will start the work on the patch that makes the hack worthless. So, the web of trust on these things has to be tight... so again, how do the new script kiddies get in the club?

    5. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But the script kiddies described in the article seems quite technical (not just "I winnuke you lolol") since they seem to discover vulnerabilities way before everyone else (Cf Article).

      I don't want to start another hacker/cracker flamewar but I think we should reserve the term script kiddies to people who effectively do nothing more than running other people's malicious scripts.
      We need to find another term for describing these immature, yet skilled, adolescents that discover vulnerabilities by themselves in order to higher their social rank. (Cf article where they talk about '0day servers' with newly found vulnerabilities ready for kiddies' next war)

    6. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by _Sharp'r_ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      BGP is a little less fragile than that, but not by much.

      A well setup core router will protect your network from most bad announcements from your downstream clients, but if one of your upstream providers gives you the right bad info because their router has been screwed with, you're out of luck until a real person figures it out and takes the link down.

      Then of course, all the outgoing traffic for that link cascades over to your others.... and now that many people are blocking snmp due to Cisco vulnerabilities it gets a little harder to figure problems out.

      And of course, much of the incoming traffic probably still sees the downed link as a valid ASN path, and since that's beyond your control... yeah, you can get screwed pretty easily by one router on an upstream provider's network that misbehaves in just the right ways.

      Truthfully, most major ISPs' NOCs are pretty fast to respond to BGP screwups, but problems caused by a mistake vs. problems caused on purpose with a little forethought and topology knowledge are two different beasties...

      --
      The party of stupid and the party of evil get together and do something both stupid and evil, then call it bipartisan.
    7. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by DoraLives · · Score: 5, Interesting
      if we can find a way to take away their motivations, we'll have less hassles to do with on our networks.

      Bored children break stuff for the sheer hell of it. To seek deeper meaning here is to completely fail to understand bored children. Distract (and that's all you can do, merely distract) child A from breaking a thing, and child B will come along and break it while you're still busy with child A. There's nothing to see here. Move along.

      we'd like to know what motivates black hats

      You're presuming to use logic (or something similar) to understand a non-logical phenomenon. Don't work. Human emotion is a manifestly NONlinear function and additionally changes from one state to another with about the same level of predictabliity as the position and momentum of a particular subatomic particle. Fuggabouddit.

      we'd like to find a way to get them to play on the white team

      That way has already been found: Let them grow up. They'll get over it. Or at least most of them will. But you can never predict with certainty exactly which ones. And every year a new crop is growing.

      --
      Is it fascism yet?
    8. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by zagmar · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think one of the points being made in the article was that these kids are fed the exploits in order to remove any potential legal reprisal from the original discoverer, hence the mention of Al-Qaeda. Think about it this way: I'm a 30 year old sysadmin with a chip on my shoulder and I discover a nasty security hole in a piece of software that my employer, as well as hundreds or thousands of other companies, use. Am I going to use this myself, opening me up to all kinds of charges (which are much easier to back up because of my position, and which have much nastier names, such as "corporate sabotage,") or am I going to tell the gang of 1337 h4x0rz that I see every night on IRC, hoping that they will hit my company as well as all the others that use the software?

    9. Re:How is this a 'culture'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They don't necessarily know what they're doing. Admittedly, when I was in highschool I tried to launch my own botnet. I was DoSed twice on unrelated conditions and got fed up. Plus I wanted to mess with my own friends' connections. After a little digging I found a binary for a botnet which I was able to hex edit and customize to create my botnet. At this time I was just learning C++ and later I found an open source trojan that had much more abilities already coded plus I could add my own. I knew nothing about the inner workings of the net, spoofing (which was hard on win9x machines), or very much C++ at all. One week summed up a nice botnet. At a very young age I discovered that people will run anything if you just plant enough binaries. I disguised it as things I myself would've been interested in: console emulators, porn (yes executable porn, youve seen this), and secuirty related software. I found out that some of my closest online friends has independetly and secretly built their own botnets. It seems like the best thing since well..the internet. To have so much power at a young age and EVERYONE was doing it. Soon I was confronted by a very intelligent person who talked me out of this shit, very nicely even though I was trying to infect him. I uninstalled the bots and shut down the channel. Now I know if I had kept going I would have had a lot of power that I shouldnt. I wasn't using exploits that affect hundreds of thousands of windows machines or any other fancy distribution methods. I just put my file on the net and let them come to me. Botnets are too easy to create and since bandwidth is cheap they will cause more problems. Something must be done to stop these kids without ruining their lives. I wanted to learn and destroy, but not without good reason to. Of course if someone will DDoS company sites and cause damage they should be punished but they should be stopped before this happens. They dont know what they are doing.

  4. Two implications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The most amusing implications are:

    a) Its a culture.
    b) Someone would actually want to see it.

    10 years ago I did the script kid thing for a bit (before having a life). Its a bunch of kids who's parents are not really involved in their lives, and have nothing better to do than look for a digital mate by typing "A/S/L?!?!??! and talking about their privates.

    I could seriously care less.

    1. Re:Two implications by WwWonka · · Score: 5, Funny

      The most amusing implications are:
      a) Its a culture.

      So is yogurt.

      b) Someone would actually want to see it.

      Somebody somewhere paid money to watch Gigli as well.

  5. A peak at script kiddie culture.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Look no further.

  6. Publicity by Un0r1g1nal · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From what I understand of script kiddies they mostly do stuff from sheer boredom (what ever happened to the good ole outdoors?) and for the extra pseudo attention they get from it. Surely by attempting to interview and do articles on this 'culture' they are just pandering to the desires of these script kiddies. And rather than helping them to realise that they need to grow up etc, the extra attention is only going to make them have a greater desire to wreak havock with their 'leet skills'

    --
    If at first you DON'T succeed, Skydiving is NOT for YOU!!
  7. Bahh, these kids today... by k4_pacific · · Score: 5, Funny

    Back in my day, we didn't have computers. We would see how long we could balance on a flagpole or we would see how many goldfish we could fit in a telephone booth. Hell, once I danced the Charleston on a flagpole for 12 hours. Won me a brand new LaSalle. Now, pranks and mischief are all electronic, done with them newfangled computers by them so called script-kiddies.

    Takes the fun out of being a kid if you ask me. Hmmmpphh

    --
    Unknown host pong.
  8. Just how do you stop a DDoS? by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From an admin's perspective, a DDoS is the scariest attack of all. There's nothing you can do to prevent it, and nothing you can do to stop it.

    An admin whose network is being DDoSed really doesn't have much hope of doing anything. Their inbound communication line to the outside world is being flooded with so much garbage information, the signals that they want to get over that line are simply drowned out. Incoming connections can't get a turn going down the pipe, so they time out. He's powerless, everything in his shop is nice and secure, but can't function without geting any useful requests. That poor admin can call his ISP... but there's really not much the ISP can do from their side of the line.

    The real problem in a DDoS attack is not that the final victim's security has gone wrong, but the security of other computers elsewhere on the Internet have been compromised, and they've been turned into zombies contributing to the DDoS flood. The DDoS will not subside until nearly all those machines are all patched, but that's not something the victim's people can do. They have to wait for the Anti-Virus providers and software providers to knock down the flamethrowers that are all being shot in the same direction.

    Any time you're relying on third parties who don't work for you to save your business, you're really up a creek and are throwing yourself on the mercy of the tech world. Hopefully they'll save you in time, because there's really not much you can do from your own datacenter.

  9. Baseball BATS ! by MajorDick · · Score: 5, Funny

    We had a script kiddie (didnt know it at first) trying desperatley to hack several of our servers, I reckognized the IP block he was on and called up my buddy who was the sysadmin for the ISP he was connected from, Soooo he gave mne his name and address. Me and my dad Im 6'2 230 lbs and my dad looks like george carlin on steroids, well we knocked on the door of a very nice house at about 4:00 pm , to the door comes a pimpled faced rugrat about 14, I told him we were here about the hacking attempt on our server, the kid turned purple, andd I honest to gfod thought he was gonna piss himself , we had a nice little discussion and told him the next call was to the FBI for attempted bank robbery as we hosted several credit unions, never had anymore problems from this fellow. We did take a baseball bat along just in case he was bigger than we were , This was going back some time 96 or so.

    1. Re:Baseball BATS ! by geekoid · · Score: 5, Funny

      you do that to my son, and your ISP will be the victim of a tragic backhoe accident.

      Your revenge is measured in pounds, mine is measured in grains.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  10. *cue Steve Irwin aussie accent* by enrico_suave · · Score: 5, Funny

    Krikey... here we see the script kiddie in his native habitat, his parents spare room... look at how he asks for warez and 733t scriptz in AOL chatrooms...
    We musn't approach too quickly or we'll startle the little feller...

    --
    Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
  11. It doesn't sound right... by bentonsmith · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...the interviewed party sounds like he's making things up as he goes along for greater exposure and interest. There is nothing there that jumps out to me and says "liar", but at the same time, I think that the interviewee might have been, er thinking about this topic too much and might be blowing things out of proportion just a little bit.

    Do people on IRC attack conference line services? Oh yes, I've seen it being done several times, and FoF is something of a wheel in this scene. Are said hijacked conference lines used for neferious purposes? I'm sure once in a while, but really they are mostly used for the purposes of socialization... same as has been the case with phreaking the past.

    What do people do the first time they phreak? They call a faraway place and talk to someone just because it is neat to talk to someone in England, or Fiji or somewhere far away without cost.

    What is the primary use of these phreak'd conference lines? Socialization, a way for people who are geographically distant who have got to know each other on IRC to talk to each other without cost. Believe you me, the content of these conversations is far more likely to contain dreary e/n stuff rather than Plots To Take Over The World.

    The intimation that this culture could somehow be for sale to nefarious people and powers is frankly outrageous and hysterical at the very same time.

    --
    -- benton.
  12. Re:Society Problem by King_TJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think it's mainly a result of the "generation gap".... You've got parents who know very little about their own computers, and their kids who are pretty comfortable getting around online with it.

    I've known quite a few kids/teens who got into loads of mischief with their PC, despite having otherwise caring and pretty observant parents.

    Their folks were just sucked into the idea that their kids spending a lot of time on the computer had to be a "good thing", since they were learning "useful skills" and "doing something more educational than sitting around, watching TV".

    There are plenty of things to blame parents for, but this is probably not really one of them. If you're the parent of a kid who is of "above average intelligence" and generally seems to stay out of trouble (not doing drugs and partying all night long, etc. etc.), and you're not too computer literate yourself -- just how much are you supposed to do when he/she figures out how to DoS corporate networks with his/her newfound online buddies?

  13. Script Kiddie Culture? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
  14. Nice question! by 955301 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm betting that the kiddies play a role, in much the same way the messenger does for the author of the letter.

    And like the messenger, they are more likely to get shot by the good guys when the let a hack loose into the wild.

    Could it be that a few black (and possibly white) hatters find that they serve a purpose?

    --
    You are checking your backups, aren't you?
  15. Translation by $0+31337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    didnt = didn't
    reckognized = recognized
    mne = me
    Im = I'm
    andd = and
    gfod = god

    Damn... I sure as hell hope you're not a programmer at your job. If so, I'd love to see some of your code

    #!/usr/been/purl

    opin(INFILE,"/etc/paswd") || die("Fil naught fownd");

    Sorry about making fun of you, please don't bring your dad to my house.

  16. Appropriately timed article by Texas+Rose+on+Lava+L · · Score: 5, Funny

    A Peek At Script Kiddie Culture

    Posted by timothy on Saturday March 06, @06:03PM

    We all know "5cr1p7 k1dd13z" don't have much of a social life, so there should be plenty of them around to comment on this article on a Saturday night. The Slashdot editors are smarter than a lot of people want to give them credit for.

  17. Paul Vixie quoted in the article (via a link) by BrookHarty · · Score: 5, Informative

    Paul Vixie quoted in the article (via a link)

    'Recommendation: upgrade your peering requirements to include language like:

    Each peer agrees to emit only IP packets with accurate
    source addresses, to require their customers to do likewise,
    and to extend this requirement to all other peers by $DATE.

    Where DATE = (now() + '6 months') or some other negotiated value.



    Peering agreements are so thick with political BS, they can't even stop ISP's like UUNet who are the biggest spam friendly ISP's around.

    Basically everyone is trying to use standards for protocols to correct this, engineers trying to correct political problems.

  18. Exactamundo by benjamindees · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Kids do all sorts of anti-social stuff, but, even when they're mostly minding their own business, they get pissed on. I love it how everyone expects *teenagers* to spend their free time caring for puppies and the homeless.

    Here in a decent-sized city in the (yay) midwest, the evening activities available to those under eighteen are: bowling, cruising, wandering the streets aimlessly, and, ummm, well that's pretty much it.

    Everything in town closes at 9:00. *Public* parks close. There's a constant crackdown on 'cruising' for some reason. There's an 11:00 curfew for everyone under-18.

    So, the choices for a kid growing up around here are: 'sit in your room all evening with your computer' or 'break some sort of law'. Apparently, now our fearless leaders have found a way to make 'sitting in your room' against the law as if they would rather these kids be roaming the streets vandalizing cars and buildings. Great.

    At least, this way, they are actually learning some things about computers and causing *very* little damage in the process. I think we all need to be a little more realistic: kids cost money and destroy things. The fact that *the internet* isn't a little more kid-proof should be of more concern to everyone than the slightly-less-than-moral decisions made by a bunch of teenagers.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  19. Re:not many people fully understand, or get to see by caino59 · · Score: 5, Funny

    but his employees may suffer in effeciency...

    because they are wanking off to said 'pr0n'

  20. Re:Script kiddie "Culture???" by Daltorak · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure the "good souls at NAMBLA" will appreciate us calling attention to a society of 'kiddies' who have no social life, know how to chat about 'body parts', and exchange nude pictures over the Internet.

  21. Let us bandy words, shall we? by Squarepusher · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I won't pretend to be a real techie guy, you can go ahead and stick me in the "Joe Average" category. Although as a Mr. Average I do hang around /. a bit and so am aware of these kind of topics and concerns, which is more than (can I say most?) could say.

    Anywho...with that said here's my $.02:

    I think that everyone posting above me has their own valid points which I shall paraphrase here.

    1. We don't want money being thrown away to fight a battle that may or may not be won, if winning is even a real possibility.

    2. We can agree that the actions of these "script kiddies" is to some degree detrimental to business. Seeing as how s#it rolls down hill, it can also have an impact on us blue collar folks. I think it's accurate to say that the negative impact will grow and become more noticeable as time passes.

    So, what kind of happy medium can be found amidst the viewpoints which say either "It's a waste of resources to fight." or "Something must be done."?

    Should officials not try to trim the fat from current programs and then allocate the new resources to fight this growing problem? I'm responding here off the cuff so I sheepishly admit I don't have a prepared list of potential candidates for severence. But, therein lies my question; Where is the government and general law enforcement concentrating that is perhaps irrelevant.

    I know plenty of people here can come up with a long list of things our government wastes money on. Furthermore I'll bet'cha we can get over half those involved in the discussion to agree to the slashing of this or that. What say ye pantheon of knowledge?

    ---

    --
    Every hour wounds. The last one kills.
    1. Re:Let us bandy words, shall we? by wmspringer · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I know plenty of people here can come up with a long list of things our government wastes money on. Furthermore I'll bet'cha we can get over half those involved in the discussion to agree to the slashing of this or that. What say ye pantheon of knowledge?

      Unfortunately...

      The liberal voters here will say that the tax cuts for millionaires are what we should get rid of.

      The conservative voters will say that services for the poor (welfare, etc) are what we should get rid of.

      Neither side will agree with the other.

  22. On a similar note... by Cyno01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mt dew is a great agar for growing script kiddies...

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  23. Yes by Felinoid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's easier to sell companys, government agentcys and cable modem users on using reasonable security precautions with half a million children running around with viruses and such looking to screw with anyone who gives them half a chance than it is to sell them on the notion that the 6 big bad nasty terrorist black hatters will crush them like a grape if they make the sligtest mistake.

    People will assume they are safe from the big time terrorist dude becouse "I'm not a sereous target".
    DDoS attacks against major targets use hacked cable modem users desktops.
    Spammers use Worms to establish a spamming network.
    ID theft resulting from the simplist of mistakes.

    That stuff happening today.

    When telling people how important security is:
    With out script kiddies
    "Why would anyone attack me?"
    "Your system can be used as a launching point for all sorts of attacks"
    "Yeah right."
    It's hard for a person to picture how "they alone" could be be a target and they'd be right becouse they aren't alone. But the details sound like SiFi to most people and they tune you out.

    With script kiddies.
    "Why would anyone want to attack me?"
    "Becouse your an easy target. Script kiddies need no other reason"

    --
    I don't actually exist.
  24. Better explanations available? by iion_tichy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Maybe it's still too early in the morning for me, but I didn't understand much of what that article said. OK, Kiddies organize in gangs and they hang out on IRC. What else is going on?? What does the 'war' consist of, who controls more machines on the internet? And it's being fought by copy & pasting the lastet Viri, Trojan Horses etc. and spreadng them around? Why can't IRC be secured, after all those years?

    Some understandable explanations would be much appreciated...