Slashdot Mirror


'Brain Pacemakers' Being Tested

meshmar writes "Shades of 'The Terminal Man'? Rob Stein of The Washington Post has reported, via MSNBC, that: 'A handful of scientists around the world have begun cautiously experimenting with devices implanted in patients' bodies to deliver precisely targeted electrical stimulation to the brain in hopes of treating otherwise hopeless behavioral, neurological and psychiatric disorders.' A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

80 of 352 comments (clear)

  1. nah, probably not. by garcia · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Shades of 'The Terminal Man'?

    According to the novel a man with "psychomotor epilepsy" was severely hurting/killing people w/no memories of the events. He was implanted with some sort of device that shocked areas of his brain and stopped the seizures before they happened. The doctors chose an area of the brain that was the pleasure center. The brain began CAUSING seizures to get the shocks.

    So, as long as they don't put the shocks into the pleasure centers this should work out! Sci-fi for the masses!

    Note: I am only basing this on the book. IANANS (neurosurgeon).

    1. Re:nah, probably not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      The possiblities are astounding! Buy a Microsoft product, get an orgasm!

    2. Re:nah, probably not. by Otter · · Score: 5, Funny
      So, as long as they don't put the shocks into the pleasure centers this should work out!

      I think the concern is that people would do precisely that. After all, it happened on both Futurama *and* the Simpsons, so naturally it's of grave concern to the Slashdot editors.

    3. Re:nah, probably not. by woohoodonuts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Moreover, researchers say, the treatment has the advantage of being able to be simply turned off or removed if it does not work or if problems occur.
      Nevertheless, the research arouses fears of reviving the reckless use of brain surgery, about the wisdom of poking around in what some consider the font of a person's humanity, about oversimplifying mental illness as a purely biological problem, and the temptation to move too quickly to try out new technologies.

      and then I read this
      A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too.

      My question is this: what technology has been created in the past that COULD NOT have potentially been misused? Sure, you invented a pencil... a whole lot of good could come from this--but some dejected office worker could jam it in someone's ear too...

      This technology has the potential to be fantastic. Sure, a crazy mad scientist somewhere could definitely mess someone up pretty bad with this stuff--but how many medical procedures are already performed now where the doctor Doesn't have to power to seriously mess the patient up?

      I support this technology... Yeah, sure... Doctor's may be able to kill someone with it... but they also may just run someone over on the sidewalk driving home. And before anyone starts ranting about thousands of armies full of pacemaker brain-people... cut me a break. (although it would probably make a pretty cool book) There's too many things that are not directly related to science for that to happen... so the argument isnt' exactly with the science but with the implementation of it... There are more holes... also, but they're not on-topic to this discussion....

      Give science a break... this stuff could save lives and help out a lot of people.

    4. Re:nah, probably not. by imr · · Score: 4, Funny

      It would probably be:
      Buy a Microsoft product, get a BSOD (Blue Schock Of Death)!

    5. Re:nah, probably not. by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 5, Funny

      Buy a Microsoft product, get an orgasm!

      You're under the mistaken assumption that people have an orgasm every time they're screwed :-)

    6. Re:nah, probably not. by bugnuts · · Score: 2, Funny

      Great Googlymoogly! I can start using a two-handed keyboard again!

    7. Re:nah, probably not. by flewp · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, you didn't. And the world would have been a better place had you not.

      --
      WWJD.... for a Klondike bar?
  2. Clockwork Orange comes to life by Gr8Apes · · Score: 4, Interesting

    in a kinder, more gentle way. Instead of causing huge pain in reformed criminals when they hear music, you can now just give them "corrective shocks" for the misbehaving brain segment! Next, we'll all be stepping in lock-step....

    --
    The cesspool just got a check and balance.
    1. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by geekee · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think you misunderstood the book, or have oversimplified it. He was conditioned to feel ill when thinking about pychotic behavior using drugs. However, one of the movies used to condition him used Beethoven's 9th, which he then became ill when hearing. The govt. removed the conditioning because it was determined that the rights of this pychopath were violated since he could no longer enjoy Beethoven.

      --
      Vote for Pedro
    2. Re:Clockwork Orange comes to life by yet+another+coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Do you really think it would be so bad? Unless it were targeted to an area of the brain involved in pain processing, it would not be painful. If we were able to isolate the roots of antisocial behavior precisely enough to know certain brain areas and pathways, it might be cruel not to treat. Autonomy is a central idea of modern medicine and modern governments, and I would not advocate performing such procedures on a competent person against her or his wishes. Such treatments for people who could benefit, however, should be a goal.

  3. I know just who to test this on by ageoffri · · Score: 3, Funny
    Daryl McBride. There has to be something wrong with his brain and some nice little shocks couldn't hurt him.

    --
    -- Slashdot, making the Left look conservative since 1997.
  4. online reservation NOW. I mean *NOW*. by tasinet · · Score: 2, Funny

    Reserve one, under the name George W. Bush. He'll need a lot of boosting in that section. Thank you.

  5. Battle Field Earth by spribyl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Didn't the bad dudes in Battle Field Earth have implants that caused them to be extra agressive and bad actors.

  6. no good. by Quasar1999 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Trust me, I speak from experience... I've electricuted myself enough times to know that only bad things come of passing electricity through the brain via outside stimulus... (notice my horrible spelling, contrary to popular belief, I used to be good at spelling until I decided to staple a live electrical wire...)

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:no good. by Monkelectric · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually for SEVERE depression electric shocks can be a treatment. It is considered a last resort though. For some patients its the only thing that does any good. I recall seeing a 20/20 about it. They shock you in a controlled environment, and the treatments effects last anywhere from a few weeks to a few months. The guy they interviewed was unresponsive to meds but got some relief from the shock treatments.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    2. Re:no good. by OwlWhacker · · Score: 2, Funny

      My experience with electrocution taught me never to trust old vacuum tube radios again.

      It did help me uncover an unknown vocal talent though...

    3. Re:no good. by baryon351 · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm a candidate for ECT. I'd like to get it done sooner rather than later, as years of all kinds of therapy & drugs have done absolutely nil. It gets tiring going over some similar variation on the drugs/therapy routing, working up a little hope for just a slight improvement, to still go no further.

      I wouldn't like to see ECT or probes in the brain used as a first resort for someone who'd been depressed for a couple of weeks, as a little help can go a LONG way in many people.

      The shocks used in ECT are quite controlled, with muscle relaxants to minimise any muscular contraction that goes along with the shock. It works for some reason, and that reason isn't exactly known. Personally I don't give a shit why it works or how, or even if it wipes 20 years from my life. Chronic treatment resistant depression has laid waste to the last 20 years of my life, doing nothing isn't going to make the next 20 any better.

    4. Re:no good. by yet+another+coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      It certainly is a frightening proposition, but I want to counter some of the stupid /. jokes. You seem to understand the procedure well, almost certainly more than I do. I will add a little more, though.

      Typically, a person has a few treatments within a few days. The mechanism of its action is mysterious. It works very well for some people, though. The most likely adverse effect is amnesia, especially for events surrounding the therapy. The recovery from depression can be very fast compared to medications. I have heard of people who preferred ECT to drugs upon having a recurrence of depression years later because it had worked very quickly for them the first time, and they did not want to wait so long to get better. People who receive therapy usually come out with much improved mood and seem perfectly normal.

      Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is an investigational tool that may replace ECT someday. The idea is the same, to cause a burst of activity within the brain. It might offer the advantage of better targeting. The magnetic pulses are focused somehow to affect structures such as the amygdala and cingulate gyrus more than the rest of the brain and the body. I have heard that early studies have shown promise, but I have not read about it first hand.

      Whether or not you decide to pursue ECT, I wish you the best.

  7. Harrison Bergeron Anyone by nordic2001 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yikes.

    http://penguinppc.org/~hollis/personal/bergeron. sh tml

  8. A good thing by g0bshiTe · · Score: 2, Funny

    This would be a good thing. If I had an implant I could program my computer at work to monitor my brainwaves. When they showed I was asleep my system could give me a little wake up jolt.

    "3M We don't make your brain. We make it better."

    --
    I am Bennett Haselton! I am Bennett Haselton!
  9. V-Chip? by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 5, Funny

    Dr. Vosknocker: Now, I want you to say "doggy".
    Cartman: Doggy.
    Dr. Vosknocker: [to audience] Notice, that nothing happens. [to Cartman] Now, say "montana".
    Cartman: Montana.
    Dr. Vosknocker: Good. Now, "pillow".
    Cartman: Pillow.
    Dr. Vosknocker: Alright. Now I want you to say "horse f*cker".
    Mrs. Cartman: Go on, honey. It's alright.
    Cartman: Horse fu-- [gets shocked by the V-chip] That hurts, god damn it!
    [gets shocked again]
    Dr. Vosknocker: Now I want you to say "big floppy donkey dick".
    Cartman: No!
    Dr. Vosknocker: [to audience] Success! The child doesn't want to swear!
    Cartman: This isn't fair, you sons of bi--
    [gets shocked repeatedly]

    --
    Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
    1. Re:V-Chip? by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 2, Funny

      They should have recognised the chip was defective right at the start. As someone who's lived here a couple years, I can verify that the strongest profanity he says there is, in fact, the word Montana.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
  10. Put Down That Twinkie! by druske · · Score: 4, Funny
    "...researchers have begun testing on monkeys to see whether the devices might suppress appetite, and perhaps boost metabolism, in obese people..."
    "Eat less or we'll CUT YOUR SKULL OPEN AND STICK A CHIP IN YOUR HEAD!"

    Yeah, I think that would suppress my appetite...
  11. Are we losing something in all of this by Ckwop · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder if the progress of science in treating "mental illness" is potentially reducing the creativity of our race.

    It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

    Some of these "mad" people probably aren't mad at all.. they're just rather odd but that oddity gives can give them brilliant insight!

    Simon.

    1. Re:Are we losing something in all of this by FroMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

      Yes, and we know why my wife and I have such a good time...

      Oh, nevermind...

      --
      Norris/Palin 2012
      Fact: We deserve leaders who can kick your ass and field dress your carcass.
  12. strangely related... by segment · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is your brain on DARPA. any questions?

    DARPA researchers are also at work on the "Brain Machine Interface" ("neuromics") project, designed as a mind/machine interface, allowing mechanical devices to be controlled via thought-power. Thus far, researchers have taught a monkey to move a computer mouse and a telerobotic arm simply by thinking about it. With arrays of up to 96 electrodes implanted in their brains, the animals are able to reach for food with a robotic arm. Researchers even transmitted the signals over the internet, allowing remote control of an robotic arm 600 miles away. In the future they hope to develop a "non-invasive interface" for human use. Says DARPA, "The long-term Defense implications of finding ways to turn thoughts into acts, if it can be developed, are enormous: imagine U.S. warfighters that only need use the power of their thoughts to do things at great distances." For years, the U.S. military has been improving its ability to reach out and kill someone. What's the mantra of the future? Maybe, if you think it, they will die. Wild weapons of DARPA

  13. ha! by WormholeFiend · · Score: 5, Funny

    they can have control over my brain when they pry it out of my cold, dead skull!

  14. Interesting by SteveXE · · Score: 2, Funny

    Hi im ::ZAP!:: Steve, dont mind ::ZAP!:: me i use to ::ZAP!:: suffer from anxiety atta ::ZAP!:: cks. Now i just ::ZAP!:: stutter.

  15. noozflash! by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 4, Insightful
    But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

    Gee. Ya think?

    Can we once and for all just declare that ANYTHING can be misued and be done with it? It's not exactly secret Jedi lore.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:noozflash! by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, some things just happen to be more easily misused. For example:

      A fork can kill a person.
      A bomb can kill a person.

      Don't you think that such concerns are more warranted when someone builds a new kind of bomb than when they build a new kind of fork?

      This is a great little device that obviously has abuse written all over it. Even the good guys look at this and cringe. Such devices might look good on paper (or in a controlled lab) but I sure as hell don't want them anywhere else.

  16. Indeed! by AIX-Hood · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've been a victiZZZZZT ... beneficiary of this technology and I would like to say it has brought me nothing but extreme paiZZZZZZT ... joy as I see that other people may now implanted with this horrifiZZZZZZZZZTTTT ... hopeful device.

  17. Technology by DrugCheese · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any technology can be used for good or evil. A board with a nail through it can be the beginning of a house for the homeless, or an instrument to bloody someone to death.

    I'm a huge fan of new technology and was wondering when someone would start to broach this area. I've read several pages of different universities that were playing with this including my favorite Caltech. This is great as it's a step away from just having the patient hardwired into a computer system.

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
  18. There are FOUR LIGHTS!!!! by ghettoboy22 · · Score: 2, Funny

    OK so my first reaction brings back memories of a naked Patrick Stewart but I digress....

  19. Quick diagnosis... by Faust7 · · Score: 2, Funny

    "You've got the crazies. I prescribe 5 milliamps every 3 hours."

  20. Terminal man? How about Harrison Bergeron? by david_reese · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Great short story by Kurt Vonnegut. From the first few paragraphs:

    Some things about living still weren't quite right, though. April for instance, still drove people crazy by not being springtime. And it was in that clammy month that the H-G men took George and Hazel Bergeron's fourteen-year-old son, Harrison, away.

    It was tragic, all right, but George and Hazel couldn't think about it very hard. Hazel had a perfectly average intelligence, which meant she couldn't think about anything except in short bursts. And George, while his intelligence was way above normal, had a little mental handicap radio in his ear. He was required by law to wear it at all times. It was tuned to a government transmitter. Every twenty seconds or so, the transmitter would send out some sharp noise to keep people like George from taking unfair advantage of their brains.

  21. Potential for misuse? by mal0rd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I really doubt this has much potential for misuse. Whatever misuse I can think of there is an easier method already invented. I mean if you let somebody stick an electronic gismo into your body you probably are desperate or out of your mind enough to submit to most anything. That comment by the poster really needs to be backed up. Until this it's just typical slashdot ramblings.

  22. Epileptic Stimulator by Br0therShin · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yeah, They have these for people with epilepsy. they stimulate the Vagus Nerve by sending periodic shocks.. I guess the idea is to set some regularity for the brain to base by.. but does anyone else think its dangerous to send shocks into nerves? Wouldent the heart be impacted etc?

    1. Re:Epileptic Stimulator by lockholm · · Score: 2, Informative
      The vagus nerve is the a major carrier of parasympathetic nerve fibers. The parasympathetic nerves, when stimulated, mediate the "resting" states of the body - increasing digestion, slowing heart rate, constricting the airways, and so on. In vagal nerve stimulation, the side effects you see don't affect the heart, they are more likely to affect the airways (you can experience hoarseness and difficulty breathing) this is probably because the parasympathetic nerve activation is very specific - you activate one fiber, which has a very specific effect, rather than activating the whole parasympathetic nervous system.

      The point is, this is approved because it is safe - it doesn't damage the heart, though I'm sure it's possible that some side effects could include those on heart rate. And "sending shocks into nerves" - this is how the body sends signals on nerves! Sending excess current in would be a bad idea, yes, but electricity itself is not evil. Similarly, it seems that limited electrical signals in the brain could have benefits that outweigh the negatives.

      ps: I have no idea WHY vagal stimulation works, though.

  23. Misuse? by friendofafriend · · Score: 2, Insightful
    But I can see a the potential for misuse too

    Come on, do you really think that? How many deaths from intentional frying of heart pacemakers have there been?

    1. Re:Misuse? by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 2, Interesting

      well the first thing I thought of was... (recreational) drugs. think (rec)drugs mess up your mind now, wait till we get electronic computerized drugs...

  24. *Zap* by whitelabrat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have a brain pacemaker and it sucks...*ZAP*

    I mean they're fantastic.

  25. Re:Southpark... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Only on slashdot would someone try to make a serious point and use South Park as an example.

  26. weirder news comes to mind... by segment · · Score: 3, Funny

    Things look far more frightening, in fact. Genetic weapons could do more than destroy an ethnic group. They could kill according to a person's 'usefulness' or 'talents'. American journalist and bestselling author Thom Hartmann has argued that it would even be possible to kill those with the gene for attention deficit disorder. This means that if you are easily distracted and have a hard time concentrating (there could be other selection criteria as well), you could end up marked for destruction. The Mark of Doom Finally! A solution for those trolls

  27. How ironic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "A lot of good can come out of this - potentially. But I can see a the potential for misuse too."

    It's pretty ironic that the editor is paranoid about a procedure to cure paranoia.

  28. All we have to lose is our urban myths by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting
    It's long been know that genius is "in bed" with madness.

    No, it has NOT "long been known" that genius is in bed with madness. IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders.

    However, mental illness DOES correleate well with poverty.

    And any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false. These illnesses are most often a serious disability to people with otherwise normal intelligence and creativity. To suggest to these people that it's some sort of boon would be cruel.

    Some of these "mad" people probably aren't mad at all.. they're just rather odd but that oddity gives can give them brilliant insight!

    No rational person would ever suggest that mere eccentricity is a mental illness.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
    1. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by frankie · · Score: 4, Interesting
      any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false

      I think you need to have a word with the authors of published studies linking creativity and mental illness, because psych researchers at multiple universities disagree with your declaration.

      A substantial and disproportionate number of world-famous writers and artists suffered from cyclothymia, if not full-blown manic-depression.
    2. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by Kaa · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, it has NOT "long been known" that genius is in bed with madness. IQ has never significantly correleated with any mental disorders. ... And any correleation between mental illness and creativity is clearly and demostratably false.

      Whoa, slow down. You are not making sense. First, IQ *does* correlate with certain mental illnesses -- negatively. For example people with a Down's syndrome have very low IQ.

      However that's neither here, nor there. We are talking about *geniuses* -- the far right tail of the IQ curve, nothing to do with averages. We are talking about people whose brains are *abnormal* by most definitions of normality. And some of them do walk a fine line between being a genius and being a crazy psycho.

      Note that doesn't imply that all geniuses are crazy. And it most definitely doesn't imply that all crazy people are geniuses. But to state in such strong terms that there is (and can not be) any connection between genius and madness is umm.. misleading, to put it mildly.

      --

      Kaa
      Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
    3. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by CFTM · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Common Myth: High IQ == Genius. Just because someone has a high IQ doesn't mean jack shit, not to mention the fact that IQ tests one of many facets of the brain. In fact, many modern psychologist believe that your EIQ (Emotional Intelligence Quotient) places a much larger role in success than IQ. Granted this isn't about success it's about genius.

      Not that mental illness is a good thing by any stretch of the imagination, it falls into the category of the law of unintended consequences. There is no way that we can tell what sort of things would occur with the total elimination of mental illness in many different fields. Sometimes solutions to complex problems come from a perspective that is wholey different. All I'm trying say is your blanket statement falls victim to the idea that you can know how one thing effects another when in reality one can never know such things.

    4. Re:All we have to lose is our urban myths by tumbaumba · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Ok, I read you link to Cyclothymic Personality Disorder. This is the most ridicules "disorder" ever invented. Just read it: has periods of sharpened and creative thinking alternating with periods of mental confusion and apathy; has depressive periods: depressed mood or loss of interest or pleasure in all, or almost all, activities etc. etc. What this "disorder" do is really stigmatizes normal life with our ups and downs. This is what modern clinical psychology is all about to turn all of us into some kind of gray mass. If only they could they would sedate most if not all of slashdot readers.

  29. BASF... by GAVollink · · Score: 2, Informative
    Way back (late 70s) BASF was well known for manufacturing really cheap - marginal quality cassette tapes. They are a "chemicals" conglomerate, like Dow Corning, or S.C.Johnson.

    Just now, I realise that nobody is likely to care, but I answered the question already, so I'm posting the answer anyway.

  30. Anyone know how far we may be from... by RyanFenton · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ..Treating the brain like a ROM, and being able to get a complete "brain state"? I imagine it would be difficult, a bit like reading a quantum computer, in that using any signal to read the state may reinforce some linkages, thus changing the system.

    Being able to "back up" a mind would definetly be one of those day-the-universe-changed moments. If death could mean more a loss of short-term memory since last backup, rather than loss of known existence, almost every aspect of our culture would be shaken to its core. Any number of results could be imagined.

    Even if not in ROM-style form, some form of human-as-information seems innevitable. From emulation, to virtual-life recreation, to any number of things, the human experience may not be limited to DNA & brains forever. What that means for the presumed entities behind our eyes, we do not know. But perhaps that expansion of information is part of whatever human nature is.

    Ryan Fenton

    1. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ryan,

      You MUST read Cory Doctorow's
      Down & Out in the Magic Kingdom

      It talks about backing up brains and the effect it has on a human society.

      http://craphound.com/down/download.php

      It's free, too!
      Great story!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    2. Re:Anyone know how far we may be from... by sbma44 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      as others have said: the answer is a long, long way away.

      simplest case scenario -- you need to trace every axon, find every dendrite it interfaces with, and measure the strength of the synapse, and take down the type of neurotransmitter(s) and receptor(s) used -- there are generally several configurations of receptor for each neurotransmitter, and there are at least a dozen identified neurotransmitters.

      As you mentioned, measuring synaptic strength will modify the synapse. And of course there's currently no way to do this in vivo with much precision for even one synapse -- you certainly can't do it for very many synapses. Passive sensing technologies can detect relative activity down to a precision of several hundred (thousand? I'm not up to date) neurons, but that's about it.

      Given that there are 100 billion neurons in the brain, it might take a while for this to become feasible. Maybe someday we'll be able to strip off the skull and use ultra-precise PET to start recording whole brains, but I doubt it'll be in your or my lifetime.

  31. Hardware Mods. by p4ul13 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Y'know; I *HAVE* been thinking about overclocking my brain. Of course, the heat-sink would be a bit awkward.

    --
    Paul Lenhart writes words!
  32. Maybe I could get one by John+Harrison · · Score: 2, Funny
    that would be able to keep me from reading /. compulsively.

    btw, what is up with the mini-flag at the top of the page?

  33. It works. by forand · · Score: 4, Informative

    A family friend has a daughter which such a disorder and has had something similar to this implanted in her for over a year. It has reduced the frequency and intensity of the seizures since she has had it. It does cause some discomfort at a regular interval to prevent seizures but it is a small price to pay, viewed by the parents and the child, to have less seizure. This is a great technology that needs more development.

  34. wow by bmac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When can I get my nervous system jacked so my reflexes will go with the gear?

    Seriously, though, I can't imagine there *not* being some sort of long-term damage from piping too much non-biogenerated electricity through some sub-section of the brains neural net.

    Of course, our medical establishment is giving extremely powerful central nervous system stimulants to our youth, so we know *they* don't care.

    Bonus points if you get both Gibson quotes.

    Peace & Blessings,
    bmac

  35. Can you? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Funny

    But I can OUCH! see a the OUCH! potential for OUCH! misuse too.

    OUCH! Dammit! Stop that!

    Sort of Clockwork Orangesque, eh?

  36. FDA already approved "Activa" therapy by chipace · · Score: 2, Informative

    Medtronic makes an implantable neurostimulator that treats the symptoms of Parkinsons and Natural Tremor.

    http://www.medtronic.com/activa/physician/implan ta ble.html

    The unit is implanted close to the shoulder, and the leads are fed through the neck, up to the brain.

    If symptoms are isolated to one side of the body, only one set of leads are required... otherwise two sets of leads are needed to treat both sides of the body.

    This is the only FDA approved implantable device for brain stimulation that I know of.

  37. Overclock! by psyconaut · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah, let's overclock one of these puppies! ;-)

    -psy

  38. Delgado by Kaa · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone interested in the subject should google for the name Delgado. The guy worked back in the 60s and implanted electrodes in animals' brains to see what stimulating certain regions does.

    One of his most well-known umm... party tricks involved him getting into a bull-fighting arena with a bull. The bull had an electrode implanted in its brain, and Delgado had a wireless transmitter in his hands. The bull charged, Delgado pressed a button, and the bull came to a screeching halt.

    --

    Kaa
    Kaa's Law: In any sufficiently large group of people most are idiots.
  39. Already saw a special on this.... by FerretFrottage · · Score: 2, Funny

    it was called something like "Star Trek: TNG" and they called the implants "borg" technology....whatever that means to anyone. The special reruns quite often so you can probably still catch it on certain stations.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
  40. MOD PARENT UP! by Paul+Crowley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have seen severe mental illness close up, and I think that if it could be banished from our society forever we would be very much the richer for it.

  41. I worry about this stuff. by Millennium · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The only way I can see these things as ethically allowable is if it is mandatory that they be developed in such a way that the user can remove them at will, or failing that, that they can be deactivated at will in such a manner that only the user can reactivate them.

    Abuse of these things must be impossible, not just legally but technically, before I could ever bring myself to accept them as anything but a dehumanizing abomination.

  42. BWAH-Hah-hah! Re:Tin Foil by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    We've replaced all of your tin foil with aluminum foil, which is totally permeable to our MK-ULTRA mind control beams!

    While this channel is open:

    Attention!

    Attention all implantees!

    You will now believe that smearing cottage cheese into your hair will prevent the CIA from putting voices in your heads! Report to the nearest dumpster and root around for cartons of expired cottage cheese.

    Implantees with last names beginning with a letter from A to Z should STOP taking their medication.

    Implantees with last names beginning with secret alphabet letters should continue not taking their medication.

    That is all.


    Stefan "Mental illness is a serious thing and nothing to make fun of except by insenstive jerks" Jones

  43. History of Lobotomy by cartman · · Score: 4, Informative

    The article briefly mentioned the dark history of psychosurgery. A few interesting details were omitted however.

    The most popular kind of psychosurgery ever done was the prefontal lobotomy. This technique had something of a heyday in the 1940s.

    The gentleman who invented the lobotomy (Freeman) lacked any surgical training. He would perform the procedure on an outpatient basis; he drove around the countryside in his "loboto-mobile" (quite seriously) and performed thousands of the operations himself.

    His method of lobotomizing involved jamming an icepick through the eye socket with a hammer, until the icepick was deeply recessed within the brain. Then he would wiggle the icepick around vigorously. (I'm not making this up). The entire procedure took less than 5 minutes. A hospital visit was unnecessary.

    Freeman went around the country demonstrating the procedure in mental hospitals etc. The technique fell out of favor in the 1950s, when it was learned that lobotomies had no therapeutic value whatsoever, and often had severe and permanent side-effects.

    1. Re:History of Lobotomy by spacemky · · Score: 4, Informative

      wow, that's crazy.

      I didn't belive you until I read this.

      The procedure even had experienced neurosergeons fainting...

      --
      640YB ought to be enough for anybody.
  44. Radical procedures on poorly understood organs by Featureless · · Score: 5, Funny

    OK, we have a "computer" here in the lab that's crashing a lot, and losing people's data, and we have this new theory for how to fix it. I don't exactly know how these "computers" work, of course, so we can't be sure... but we have some ideas gleaned we from when we used to just get rid of them when they broke. A lot of times, we'd take a computer out of the garbage pile and see what was inside. They're mostly green plastic in there. Lots of very small, small parts - too small for the eye to see. No one knows how they all work together, yet, but we put one in an X-Ray and gave it an MRI and we notice that certain parts are hotter than others when the computer is doing different tasks. Also, we put a computer in the blender and then studied the little chunks under a microscope. So we're definitely making progress.

    Based on all this we figure Jim in maintenance can insert some electrical probes into the "chips" and send in little shocks with just the right voltage to stop Microsoft Word from crashing so much. Plus we think it might really help our Quake 3 framerates.

    We think this could be better than the best idea we've had so far, having computer therapists sit with them and press different keys to try to recreate past successes we've had by trial and error. It couldn't be worse than our previous attempts, which involved just putting unruly computers in the closet until they got better on their own, or administering electric shocks to the outside of the case, or (my favorite) just taking the sucker down to the shop and really giving it a good whack on the drill press.

    Somebody call Discover Magazine.

  45. These really work by bozojoe · · Score: 2, Informative

    My mother suffered from Parkinson's. She got sick of all the drugs she had to take to remain functional. Her Doctor refered her to a specialist who implanted a brain pacemaker. Within a month she was off the drugs and feeling much much better.

    --
    lick the cancle button (at least thats what our Chinese QA says)
  46. Biofeedback by soren100 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Your brain already HAS a natural pacemaker, it's called the alpha rhythm, which cycles at about 8-10 seconds per second. All of the other brainwaves seem run to in sync with this rhythm, being in one way or another multiples of it.

    You can use biofeedback (or more specifically neurofeedback) to "train up" this natural pacemaker activity, teaching the brain to relieve it's own Parkinson's symptoms. This would have the advantage of having a lot fewer side effects than opening up the skill and jamming electrified wires in your brain.

    A good resource for people interested in non-surgical ways of changing their brain is Dr. Jeffrey Schwartz's book "The Mind and the Brain: neuroplasticity and the power of mental force" -- he demonstrates how people can cause profound changes in their brain wiring merely through thought.

    Insight meditation, for example has been proven helpful in teaching OCD patients how to gain control over their own obsessive thoughts.

    It certainly sounds sexy to have something like electric implants but there are other ways to get the benefits without the side effects of brain surgery. It's kind of like a back patient has the choice of having their vertebrae fused or going to a chiropractor or physical therapist.

  47. Re:Who needs implants? by tommck · · Score: 2, Funny

    Chicks with small tits?

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  48. The Original Clockwork Orange by Baldrson · · Score: 2, Informative
    Anthony Burgess, author of the book "A Clockwork Orange" was the artist in residence while I was in the undergraduate program at the Iowa City Writer's Workshop back in 1974. I think he based his book on the work of Jose M.R. Delgado, M.D. published under the book with the damn spooky title: "Physical Control of the Mind: Toward a Psychocivilized Society".

    I managed to get a copy of the book finally, and discovered wonderful passages such as the following on page 115:

    ESB [electrical stimulation of the brain -- JAB] may evoke more elaborate responses. For example, in one of our patients, electrical stimulation of the rostral part of the internal capsule produced head turning and slow displacement of the body to either side with a well-oriented and apparently normal sequence, as if the patient were looking for something. This stimulation was repeated six times on two different days with comparable results. The interesting fact was that the patient considered the evoked activity spontaneous and always offered a reasonable explanation for it. When asked, "What are you doing?" the answers were, "I am looking for my slippers," "I heard a noise," "I am restless," and "I was looking under the bed." In this case it was difficult to ascertain whether the stimulation had evoked a movement which the patient tried to justify, or if an hallucination had been elicited which subsequently induced the patient to move and to explore the surroundings.

    This passage is eerily reminiscent of a passage from Richard Dawkins' "The Extended Phenotype" chapter titled "Host Phenotypes of Parasite Genes":

    "Many fascinating examples of parasites manipulating the behavior of their hosts can be given. For nematomorph larvae, who need to break out of their insect hosts and get into water where they live as adults, '...a major difficulty in the parasite's life is the return to water. It is, therefore, of particular interest that the parasite appears to affect the behavior of its host, and "encourages" it to return to water. The mechanism by which this is achieved is obscure, but there are sufficient isolated reports to certify that the parasite does influence its host, and often suicidally for the host... One of the more dramatic reports describes an infected bee flying over a pool and, when about six feet over it, diving straight into the water. Immediately on impact the gordian worm burst out and swam into the water, the maimed bee being left to die' (Croll 1966)."
  49. Yeah, but... by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    A fork can kill a person.
    A bomb can kill a person.


    eating with a bomb is such a pain. Except with the Claymore mines: they have a nice curved spoon-like shape.

    PS Don't take that 'potato-masher' grenade thing literally.

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  50. I wouldn't worry, I make these....... by DucatiBoy · · Score: 5, Informative

    I work as a software engineer for the second biggest medical electronics company in that field (Medtronic being the biggest). I can't speak for them, but nothing goes into an implant that is not supposed to be there for functionality of what it's designed for. With the FDA constantly looking at us, we verify and validate the heck out of these things. My boss actually developed the Epileptic Stimulator pretty much all by himself back in the late 80's and early 90's. It's gone though through testing since then. It takes forever for this stuff to get put into a human. And these things are real simple. If you saw the code in these, there is no way they could do anything "evil". There is just enough code to keep time and shock the nerve ever so often, and some user settings. In order to make these last longer than a few months, the processor is clocked down into the khz and just enough code to get the job done and that's it. In this business it's all about how long the device will last till it has to get explanted. There is no way we would give up longevity for having some government mind control v-chip or something. And I'm not a Dr. but I think the electrical shock doesn't trevel that far, it starts getting "absorbed" as it traveles, so danger to the heart from a nerve stim is pretty much nil. In fact they even see that people who use the Epileptic Stimulator also seem to have a better mood. They think that no only will it help against tremmors, and parkenson's but depression as well. I suppose that if you let your mind run away with you, you could see the potential misuse in just about anything. But with how simple these are and how we want to sell these to help people (and profit) we don't want any bad press, we want people to want these. And there is no way something "bad" could be put in these with no one noticing. And if it got out, it could ruin a company. And I know that we woudln't want that to happen. I feel bad, cause I see how these help people in Europe and the FDA takes such a long time to convence that people suffer while we are jumping though hoops for them. I know people who could be helped now. I guess it's good for lots of testing though. :)

    1. Re:I wouldn't worry, I make these....... by DucatiBoy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At the risk of feeding a troll, I see that you don't seem to use your brain. A.C.

      What I was posting info about was the quote at the end with the possibility of misuse. That possibility is so close to 0 it's not even worth mentioning. I have only worked in this industry since 1991.

      And there is a huge difference between "brain stimulation" and "deep brain stimulation". Brain stimulation is though a nerve going into the brain like with the Epileptic Stimulator to the Vegus nerve. Deep brain is putting an electrode deep inside the brain.

      Either way it, to me (not a Dr. but an engineer) I'm just asked to creat a constat current source or a voltage differental for a time every so often. And that is all these devices to. They are programmable to deliver differnt pulses, but there is nothing that could be considered misuse. These are VERY simple devices.

      Heck, the top physicians in the world don't even understand exactly why this stuff works, but it does.

      And I'll bet the people that get implanted with the devices that I work on are very glad I use my brain and test the heck out of these things. To make sure it's supposed to do exactly what I mean it to do and only that.

      And I prey every day that I never need one of these devices. What these things cure (Epilisy, Parkinsons, Chronic Pain, etc....) are really rough illnesses. My heart goes out to those who have them.

  51. Deep Brain Stimulation... by Peterus7 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    My mom is actually involved with the surguries where they implant this type of thing. Pretty much she has this to say about them:

    -They're effective as all hell
    -They work best for movement disorders, such as Parkinsons, as well as Chronic pain
    -The surgury itself is pretty drastic; you have to literally drill holes in people's heads... And the patient has to be consious. Numbed up, but consious.
    -There are some side effects if it isn't done properly.

    Some of her cases include one guy who had the electrode too deep, which caused a deep depression as it was stimulating too much area. They moved it a notch up, and the depression faded instantly. Another case included a cop that would have to leave his job if he kept on having this chronic pain that kept him from working, but he is not back on the job and loving it.

    One thing she we have talked about is that it would be interesting to use them for psychiatric disorders, but with doctors perscribing ritalin and prozak at the drop of a hat, it's not a good thing to suddenly have holes drilled into kids heads.

    Also, I asked about replacing ECT with Deep brain stimulation for depression, but apparently ECT is much cheaper. Pity.

    Still, this is a LONG way away from stuff like the Matrix and Ghost in a Shell. Currently it just controls overactive areas of the brain that cause neurological diseases, nothing more, nothing less. Don't get your hopes up quite yet.

  52. Rant On by DynaSoar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First, this is not new. Grenoble is behind the curve. I've seen patients with implanted stimulators from years ago. These were for treatment of Parkinson's. It's hardly the optimal solution, but it's the best so far, even better than most of the drugs we use. Some day this will be "stone knives and bear claws". Right now it's cutting edge.

    Second, it is trivial at best to foresee abuses. The trick is in recognizing the over-reaching fact that the abuses never have anything to do with the technology involved. Those who will abuse will do so whether they have an electrical stimulator or just the rubber hammer used to test your reflexes (corrective phrenology, anyone?). These people don't even need technology to do this; they will do it gladly with no technology at all. Focusing on the abuses the technology may be put to takes the focus away from the people who will do such things, allowing them to get on with their business.

    Third, there are a lot of people out there who need something, and society in general dictates that there be someone to take care of them. Hopefully, trained specialists who can help them, but also the sad fact is because most people don't want to have to deal with it. They insist on, and are glad to have, someone fulfill the role required so they don't have to, including having to have the people with problems around them. Unfortunately these people also tend to feel guilty when they see others suffering, and rather than appreciate the fact that someone else is doing the best they can, they get upset because that person is not doing a better job. Sooner or later the people doing the helping get blamed for not being better than they are, ie. they're not perfect.

    Believe it or not, lobotomy was a god send. It still can help many people. People decry electroshock therapy, but the fact is for a lot of people, it's their only hope of a normal life. People got upset that many mental patients were stuck in hospitals with no hope of improvement and so insisted that we let them out; now those same people are no better or worse than they were, but the are far better off, since many of them are the chronic homeless (you won't give them housing, but you won't let us keep them warm and fed).

    If you want to help, aren't of the bent to help develop the tools and techniques to help people like I do, then at least keep your eye out for the kinds of people that will abuse, and get rid of them. They cause us who have to try to help people far more problems than they do others. They give us a bad name and make people suspect us. Root those people out and do something about them. Or else shut the hell up and stop repeating the painfully obvious paternalistic mantra "they might do bad things!". It's helping nothing and it's annoying.

    Rant not off. I'm not done. Not until I stop trying to develop new ways to help people, and that'll probably happen when I die or need that kind of help myself. And it won't end then because I'll train every student of mine along the way to fight this same fight. You want us to do this. You NEED us to this this. Help us do this by focusing on finding abusers and getting rid of them, so we can get on with the role that society demands exist, and we have chosen to fulfill.

    --
    "I may be synthetic, but I'm not stupid." -- Bishop 341-B
  53. rTMS vs. ECT by Amaranthyne · · Score: 3, Interesting

    FYI, there's another option besides ECT. There's a new technology called Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). brief intro here

    rTMS seems to have cured the depression that I had going on for the last 10 years (I'm 22). I'd tried nearly every kind of antidepressant, with no good/lasting results, and was ready to off myself, as I didn't consider ECT an option due to the risk of memory loss and/or brain damage. I was the one to mention rTMS to my last shrink (learned about it online, Wired might have had the first mention I saw), and somehow got a referral. I had an initial appointment, a brain scan the next day, and the day after that I was told & shown that parts of my brain were abnormal hyperactive and drawing resources away from the other parts. I had my first rTMS treatment that day and started a low dose anti-epilepsy drug and, tho I barely believe it myself, haven't been depressed since. The only side effects I've had are excedrin-treatable headaches here and there, and increased mileage on my car due to driving to chicago for maintenance treatments.

    When I say I haven't been depressed, I mean the following:
    Sad thoughts will happen, but my brain doesn't grab them and run off into despair anymore. Sometimes I'll come across thoughts that just a month and a half ago would have sent me into hours of crying or inertia, but now I'm able to be mindful, to go "oh, that's sad. hmm. that's sad because xyxyxy. I might as well think about something else." And then I do so and the parts of my brain that were white (overactive) in the scans don't dominate and I can just be myself and go about my day. I feel like my full brain capability is back. I'm more attentive, more creative. I actually feel like getting out of bed and doing things.

    AND I can use my laptop, read, or even play gameboy during the treatments! in a comfy chair!
    Plus now I have cool pictures of my brain!!!! I'm psyched to get scanned again and see what my normal brain activity looks like.

    Seriously, go see a neurologist and definitely get a brain scan before getting ECT. IMHO, ECT is too broad a disruption to the brain when it's quite possible that it's more of a localized problem. rTMS is precise, requires no anesthesia or muscle relaxants (all you have to do is keep your head still), and far, far less neurological side effects like memory loss. (I haven't forgotten a single thing).

    aie, what a first post. had to say something, tho.

    as to the initial article, the implants would be a fantabulous idea for people who respond to stuff like rTMS but need it very frequently to keep sane. where I am now, I'd rather go to the doctor's periodically than have something stuck in my head, unless it gave me superpowers or something.

  54. Re:no good. But No Choice by TackyF · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've had ECT. Eight times over two weeks in 2002. I have some memory loss surrounding that time, but I was in the middle of a two month psych stay and I know I didn't miss much. My personality wasn't erased. It is a last resort - when I got to that point I hoped it would erase the prior 4 years. But it didn't, and the procedures eliminated the psychotic symptoms I had and helped reduce the depression for several months.
    Given the history of ECT it was a very scary thing for me to consent to, but if it wasn't available then I wouldn't be writing this now.

    --
    ..close your eyes and this post will disappear..