Slashdot Mirror


CMU First To Qualify For DARPA Grand Challenge

Anonymous Coward writes "As of 18:00 March 9th, Carnegie Mellon's Red Team is the only entry to successfully complete DARPA's Grand Challenge Qualification Inspection and Demonstration (QID) before the main event on March 13th. The NY Times has this article detailing this first step towards winning the Grand Challenge."

34 of 210 comments (clear)

  1. Google News Version by byolinux · · Score: 4, Informative
  2. My University Too by rmohr02 · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the other competitors is from my university. Looking at the relative sizes, I hope the hummer in the article doesn't get in TerraMax's way.

    1. Re:My University Too by MalaclypseTheYounger · · Score: 4, Funny

      Immediately springing to mind is the scene from 'Ocean's Eleven' when the Monster truck is racing the R/C mini-monster truck, and it runs it over.

      This is the Department of Defense, after all, so maybe they will allow 'extra programming' to be done to find competitors (foes?) and destroy them?

      Turn this whole thing into a huge BattleBots contest instead of a Cannonball Run contest .. I'd pay to see that...

      --
      Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
  3. Cost to PRIZE ratio. by normal_guy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't be the only one who questions motives when the $1M prize is being sought after by a team with more than $2M already invested. What is the eventual payoff?

    --

    Linux: Free if your time is worthless.
    1. Re:Cost to PRIZE ratio. by fuctape · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Fame and name recognition. In the year 2050, you'll hear, "On the Chinese front, a Sandstorm batallion was attacked. There were, of course, no casualties, thanks to the autonomous technology pioneered in 2004."


      You've got admit that it'd be amazing to be credited with an 'historical' level invention.

    2. Re:Cost to PRIZE ratio. by Ethon · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As stated in one of the replys to your post, the DoD will probably be offering a long term contract to manufacture similar vehicles for actual combat/whatever use. The DoD has already done this with the new-gen X planes, as seen on PBS' NOVA. The DoD's JSF competition will probably end up paying the winner (Lockheed) some $1T in total contractual monies.

    3. Re:Cost to PRIZE ratio. by Ralph+Wiggam · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I've read a few articles about the Grand Challenge and they all seem to focus on CMU, the favorite. From what I understood, pretty much all of that $2M-$3.5M cost figure came in the form of free stuff from Intel, Boeing, and many others. It's not like the grad students are writing $150,000 personal checks to buy parts.

      The students probably can't pocket any prize cash anyway because of ethics rules. If they win, the students will get a rocking party and even more top notch equipment in their labs.

      It's not a race to prove you're better than the other teams and get prize money. It's a race to advance the state of a specific technology. Do you think people are going to get rich winning the X-prize?

      -B

  4. the real prize != money by sczimme · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The real prizes:

    the knowledge gained throughout the project

    getting one's name published for taking an active role in the project (which can lead to further opportunities)

    the overall experience, i.e. 'Hey, I did that"

    The pursuit of intellectual challenge is not about money...

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:the real prize != money by kidgenius · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Not too mention the possibility of future contracts that can net your school some major cash.

  5. i'd be more impressed if by theguywhosaid · · Score: 4, Interesting

    they divided your time by the cost of your machine.

    its impressive when you build a mega$ robot, but a minimal robot that manages to finish is way cooler

  6. Interesting, but ... by gravityZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... doesn't this basically lead directly to the US military dropping off Robo-Tanks in foreign countries as they please? We know that a steady diet of wars figure heavily in the plan for the forseeable future. The Robo-Tank cuts down on friendly casualties, thus making conflicts more palatable to the public.

    Now I find this as cool as anyone else, from a technological standpoint. And it definitely has civilian applicability. But let's face it, this contest isn't about finding cheaper ways to haul cargo or reach remote locations.

    1. Re:Interesting, but ... by Belisarivs · · Score: 5, Interesting
      But let's face it, this contest isn't about finding cheaper ways to haul cargo or reach remote locations.

      Sure it is. Logistics are a *huge* problem for the military, especially one that moves as fast as America's. Remember in Gulf War II that some of the most public incidents of American losses involved supply convoys, not front-line forces.

      With this sort of technology, supply-lines become more like conveyor belts than masses of convoys. They elminate the need to teams of humans to transport fuel, water, ammunition, etc. to the front lines. This increases the pool of human resources available to the military for other jobs, while eliminating the worry of casualities inflicted by enemy interdiction missions.

      Sure, automatic tanks will logically be a followup, but I think the military's mid-term goal is automating the logistics.

    2. Re:Interesting, but ... by demachina · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Based on recent experience I would take the military's word for once, though only once. If you look at Iraq most of the casualties weren't in combat. Soldiers in fast moving, heavily armored, M1 tanks really weren't that vulnerable.

      Its probably going to be a real long time before you trust a robotic tank to discriminate friend or foe and to decide when and when not to start lobbing shells. Combat really should have a person in the loop who can react quickly to a complex and changing situation, one that often requires nuance. I wager an RPV tank is the only thing you may see anytime soon.

      But if you look at Iraq the place where the Army is VERY vulnerable is convoying supplies from one place to another since they are sitting ducks for improvised explosive devices and ambushes. I could see robotic transports as priceless for this if they can cope with a predefined route, not run anything over and deal with obstructions.

      Supply lines have always been the achilles heel of occupying armies. Indications are the U.S. military doesn't really need much help in the conflict phase, but it does need a lot of help to minimize the casualties and manpower needed to occupy its colonial empire.

      --
      @de_machina
  7. Ack! by ferralis · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would sure hate to be a geologist, prospector, or hermit in the desert that day.

    Gelogist: [mumbling to himself] Finally! Proof that the formation of this arroyo was caused by--

    [Geologist is flattened by an army of driverless cars driving at upwards of 60 mph, one of which detects the collision too late and actually backs up, running over him again, as failing avoidance mechanisms kick in]

    --
    Any generalization is a stupid one.
    1. Re:Ack! by Chalybeous · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have a funny feeling some film studies geek is going to follow the action with a DV camera, and edit the raw footage into a movie using the soundtrack from "Cannonball Run"...

      I, for one, welcome our autonomous vehicle overlords - even if they do sound like Burt Reynolds.

      --

      "It is dark. You are likely to be eaten by a grue." -- Zork

  8. How is this impressive? by dave420 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I know it's much more complicated than this, but they're giving it the knowledge to navigate a route, not the intelligence to come up with its own route. Surely that's missing the whole point of this competition? I read in the last /. article that they're using a loophole in the rules to get so far.

    Seeing as DARPA wants to turn this technology into a military robotic transport, I don't know how valuable it's going to be if it has to be pre-programmed with terabytes of data just to move. What about if they invade somewhere they don't have good maps of? Somewhere with a dynamic landscape (desert, rocks etc)?

    I'm all for innovation, but exploiting poorly-worded rules just to win for winning's sake is an empty victory at best.

    1. Re:How is this impressive? by Tom7 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      From what I understand, the "loophole" allows them to use 1m satellite imagery of the route and, in two hours, plan something for the robot to follow. The robot still has to see its way when it's going, to avoid ditches and rocks and other things--it needs to do "local" route planning at 35mph. Even if the route were totally pre-programmed, the problem of following that route would still be pretty hard over hundreds of miles. You can't just do "dead reckoning."

      What about if they invade somewhere they don't have good maps of? Somewhere with a dynamic landscape (desert, rocks etc)?

      This is in the desert, and they're doing it with only satellite imagery.

      There's a huge amount of mechanical and software engineering in this thing. I think that someone must have exaggerated this "loophole" to you, because it is far from making the project easy (as far as I know, it doesn't help them in the quals at all). The robot is impressive!

  9. Re:Cool by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Informative

    The whole point behind an SUV is that, under current regulations, it's classified as a light truck, and so doesn't have some of the environmental restrictions that come with sedans, etc.

  10. QID by j0hnfr0g · · Score: 4, Funny

    The Qualification Inspection and Demonstration was rumored to be the state's Driver's License Test.

    The vehicles had been fretting about the dreaded parallel parking portion of the test.

  11. Red Team is the least impressive in some respects by John+Harrison · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Red Team is using "the best map in the world" to guide it. They have used topo maps, aerial photography, and a bunch of undergrads to painstakingly map out the terrain of the possible courses.

    All competitors are given the actual route as a series of GPS waypoints a few hours prior to the race. Red Team is going to send those waypoints back to CMU, have the big iron there figure out the best course based on all the map data, and then download that course to the robot prior to the start. In a way this is cool, but it seems like they are using a loophole. A much more interesting problem would be to navigate a course that you know nothing about other than the waypoints.

    The other teams are using techniques that require more onboard intelligence and route finding. The most interesting vehicle is from Cal. They have a motorcycle. Even though I went to Stanford I am rooting for the Cal motorcycle to do well since they have the most unique vehicle. Hopefully the team of Stanford alums (already dropped out) can come back next year and beat them.

  12. Re:Bah! by def · · Score: 3, Informative

    Basicly, it took a turn too fast.

    a picture.

    this page is the running log put out by the group, and includes a description of the accident.

    --
    WRCT Pittsburgh, 88.3FM
  13. Check out March 2004's PopSci... by PieEye · · Score: 5, Informative
    Popular Science has a great article in the March 2004 edition (online here at PopSci.com) called "Clash of the Headless Humvees".

    Weird title, seeing how they showcase the CMU entry, a high-school entry running in an Acura (donated by a parent who works for Honda) and a single-member "team" trying to do a motorcycle entry.

    --
    ... in bed.
  14. picture comparison by morcheeba · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Here's a size comparison from the Oshkosk website... their truck is 9 feet tall, a hummer is 6 feet.

  15. Don't forget bragging rights for alumni by chia_monkey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Yup, those are some pretty cool prizes. But we gotta remember other prizes, like bragging rights. I'm already sending this article all over to my fellow CMU almuni friends, to other non-geek friends, etc. All this, and I have nothing to do with robotics and graduated almost ten years ago. Woohoo! I love bragging rights...

    --

    "He uses statistics as a drunken man uses lampposts...for support rather than illumination." - Andrew Lang
  16. Re:Cool by Morologous · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's all about CAFE. Dodge's PT Cruiser is listed as a light truck too -- it's got a flat-load floor between the rear wheels. Dodge puts a four cylinder in the PT, which gets 30 MPG. This allows them to make even more fuel-hungry trucks and SUVs because their combined average is offset by the relatively high efficiency PT.

  17. Re:Broadcast? by qedigital · · Score: 4, Informative
    You can check out DARPA's satellite feed on Saturday:

    From http://www.darpa.mil/grandchallenge/media_feeds.ht m

    On Saturday, March 13, DARPA will provide same-day coverage via satellite of the Grand Challenge start and highlights at the following times:

    Live coverage of the start: 6:30 - 8:30 Pacific/9:30 - 11:30 a.m. Eastern
    Video news release: 11:00 - 11:30 a.m. Pacific/2:00 - 2:30 p.m. Eastern

    Coordinates for both feeds:
    Satellite: AMC 9, Ku, Transponder 03
    Space is: 36 MHz
    Downlink Frequency: 11760.000
    Downlink Polarity: Vertical

    Hopefully someone will record these feeds and make them available online for all of us without satellite

    --

    Rapidly approaching the Zener knee...

  18. Re:Cool by Zathrus · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's another thing - they only look the part - if a mountain popped up you'd have more chance getting over it by foot than a humvee. They use Tacoma or Silverado chassis and engines

    Whoa. Only half true.

    The original Hummer/Humvee (Hummer is the civilian version, HMMWV is the military) is a serious off-road vehicle and far surpasses most SUVs and other off-road vehicles in capabilities. It also costs around $125k (civilian version). It'll keep going long after that Range Rover gets stuck or busts its oil casing.

    The H2, aka Hummer2, however, is another story entirely. It is, as you say, merely a Tacoma with a different body shell. The original Tacoma wasn't particularly off-road capable and the reshelled version is even less so. But it's only about $60k.

    IMO, neither the original nor the bastardized step-son is particularly well suited for general civilian use. But that's me.

  19. Re:The biggest issue I have.. by Zathrus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    with this is simply how cheap the US military is getting away with this

    Getting away with what? Basic R&D?

    So you'd rather have them spend a few billion on a single supplier, who may not be able to deliver anything, and then keep all the technology as classified for an unknown period of time? Yeah, that's a great use of taxpayer money.

    Instead, they put out a challenge that allows both public and private industry to participate. Any useful technology could be immediately spun off for commercial use, and considerably less taxpayer funds are used (yes, public universities will use some taxpayer money as well, but it pales in comparison to the alternative).

    Oh, and they're still not "getting away" with anything. DARPA doesn't automatically get the technology. If they get a winner then they'll have to negotiate licensing terms.

  20. AW&ST February 23rd... by mykepredko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You might be interested in knowing that, according to AW&ST, the army/air force in Iraq has found in many cases that it is more efficient to transport cargo within Iraq via C-5, instead of 12 large trucks.

    The reason was because the loading and unloading areas could be secured but not the highways in between.

    Check out the February 23rd Issue.

    myke

  21. Re:Surprised a bit by this... Or Hey Dumbass by ffallen · · Score: 3, Funny

    I suppose that the Internet (former DARPANet) is some insidious hunter killer commmunications device?

  22. Put me on the team! by loac · · Score: 3, Funny

    I could have saved them $250,000 in sensors by installing a $100 roll bar!

    --
    The only thing that is yours, is your soul; everything else is borrowed.
  23. I was there by Kallahar · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I went by the event yesterday as a spectator and got to see Red Team do their run. Of the 23 teams who made it this far, they're the only one that has completed the qualification course so far. People complain that they have a more accurate map and that they're not doing real AI, but based on their performance on this surprise course, they have a real obstacle avoidance system.

    In one section there was a minivan parked in the center of the GPS path. Of the eight vehicles I saw run, only three made it past the car. Three hit it, and the rest failed before making it that far.

    It seemed that the biggest problems teams had were getting GPS right. Several drifted off course or turned the wrong way, going off course. One got the next GPS coord inside of its turning radius so it kept circling a spot until they turned it off.

    Lots of great designs though, and some really impressive engineering.

  24. Wrong vehicles... by Upright+Joe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man, these teams are using the wrong military vehicles. Humvees? Supply trucks? What the hell is that? Seriously man, strap a GPS system onto an M1 Abrams and open that baby up.

    I say screw collision avoidance. Go for collision dominance. Any obstacle capable of stopping a 65 ton tank travelling at 45mph is gonna show up on the mother f**king map.

  25. DARPA Grand Challenge Photos by big_ara · · Score: 5, Informative
    I am at the DARPA grand challenge right now.

    Here are some photos:

    DARPA Grand Challenge Photos

    Enjoy!