Slashdot Mirror
Time Warner To Comply With Wiretap Law
rekkanoryo writes "Time Warner Cable is taking steps to comply with the Communications Assistance For Law Enforcement Act, which requires telecommunications providers 'to help police conduct electronic surveilance.' Note that broadband providers are not yet required to comply with the law, but the FBI has stated its desire to force broadband providers under the law's jurisdiction. Invasion of privacy anyone?"
to 1984.
I have over 70 freaks, do you?
It too cold up there, move to mexico.
Now would be the time to get using PGP and similar software.
What happens if they don't comply? This is a serious case of "resistance is futile." Time Warner and the FBI are just playing their proper roles. Congress is the group that needs a clue.
Laws are for people with no friends.
So the article mentions new laws for cable and DSL. I wonder if they have covered their bases with wiretap laws for satellite ISPs?
I know little about how staellite internet access is set up beyond the cost and latency specs. Anyone know if there's less/more/similar difficulty involved something like direcway traffic? I would imagine they can still stick something like our friend "carnivore" at the direcway base station?
This news is good incentive to get out and vote in November.
---Technology will liberate us if it doesn't enslave us first.
But is this really Time Warners fault? They are making provisions to comply with a law. Yes, it does not yet apply to them, but there is a good chance that it will and they are preparing for that. Shouldn't the real issue here be with the law, not the company?
But instead, they're kowtowing to the government, ensuring that we lose another of the few shreds of privacy we had left.
Organized resistance by individuals is great - but organized resistance by corporations (who should realize that, with all the corporate scandals, may be hurting themselves by giving more wiretap power to the government) would be fantastic and pretty much unstoppable.
Let's see a show of corporate brute force! Who's with me?
So, how do you tap something with 128bit or better encryption???? What happens when it gets to 512bit encryption???? Can the FBI really decrypt that to tap it???
Evolution or ID?
The Canada that's working on abolishing anonymity on the net? That Canada?
That kind of thing won't work. At least not for the more sophisticated criminal networks, who will surely use encryption to do away with wiretapping.
It's like banning guns in the hope that criminals won't get them either. They will still do what they are used to do, but by other means.
Good Dog. I'm tired of this erosion of my rights. Yeah, 9-11 was a Bad Thing (tm) and something had to be done, but the situation is getting out of hand. It ain't just GWB, either. The lawmakers as a whole are either reacting to or catering to the fear factor.
Wiretapping has worked pretty well in the past... but with the proper legal steps taken first (court orders, whatever). Even this has been abused, but I can't see how wholesale wiretapping can be a good thing, ever.
Quote: "Legal experts said the 85-page filing includes language that could be interpreted as forcing companies to build back doors into everything..."
How would they enforce this with regards to encryption technologies?
My point is if people have something to hide, then they will use whatever mechanism there is out there to hide it. Can authorities really achieve their goals by simply imposing wiretapping laws on broadband providers?
So, it's ok to tap the phone but if the communication goes over the internet it's not ok to tap???? Why is one ok but not the other???
To tap either one they would still need a court order. The same approval process. It's not like they can just go monitor anyone they want whenever they want.
Evolution or ID?
LOL!
You're seriously delluded.
Given some previous announcements of Time Warner to get into the phone biz (http://www.dslreports.com/shownews/36287 for one example), they would already be required to comply with wiretap laws. Nothing surprising here.
Don't blame the provider for the law. Blame your lawmaker.
Dump the IRS - http://www.fairtax.org
Some people are even using 'em to record themselves performing illegal acts. I'm against further invasion of privacy, but if we continue in this declared war without a visible end we'll see more and more of this. At no time in the US does the Executive Branch of government have more time than when the country is at war- hence the "war on drugs" and "war on terror" which cause people to let their common sense blow away on the winds of excessive brain-dead so-called patriotism.
Blech. Ok- now for the backlash!
Turn on those webcams! Stream video of everyone's life into the public domain! Record EVERYTHING YOU SEE and do! The information glut we could generate would overwhelm any monitoring system that could come out, I'm thinking. :) With the increased visibility of conduct and day-by-day infractions, maybe we could effect some reforms. Kind of hard to complain about the splinter in someones eye when you can see the timber in your own on HDTV.
An interesting novel, "Light of Other Days" by Arthur C Clarke and Stephen Baxter, explores the ramifications of such a system- most painful, but generally positive.
Makes ya think, which is almost never a bad thing. :)
Any generalization is a stupid one.
OK, I'm officially the crackpot at work, because I tell them to USE ENCRYPTION! Encryption costs basically nothing, there's no reason why anyone would host a website that didn't use, or at least offer SSL. Everyone out there should use encryption for everything. Get rid of telnet, use ssh, and sftp rather than ftp. Use SSL on your websites, etc.... Encryption literally costs nothing, there is no advantage to not using it, WHY DON'T YOU USE IT? If you're too stupid to protect yourself when doing costs you nothing, then maybe you never really needed rights to begin with.
I just don't understand. It's so incredibly easy to protect your rights in this area, do you want someone else to do it for you. Clicking a button renders all their BS moot. With the effort you spend complaining you could solve the problem, it's just a button click away.
If you want untappable phones, use VPN to run your VOIP from another jurisdiction, simple as that.
You know, I often hear people holler "invasion of privacy" everytime the government suggests that they may monitor communications. Does anyone stop to think that while they are monitoring your phone sex calls, they're also monitoring Abdul "bomber-of-buildings" Akmed? Some monitoring is necessary if we're ever going to be able to sleep soundly at night.
Well , the can. All they have to do is 'pinky swear' that it is part of a National Security Matter. Just like they said the USA PATRIOT act would be used only against terrorists. Well, till they used it against that strip club owener is Vegas who has NO TERRORIST TIES>
In short, they lie.
C'mon people.
The internet is a PUBLIC network of public content. Where the hell does anyone get the idea that there is a concept of privacy involved here?
(This is not intended to be sarcastic, rhetorical, nor trolling.)
If you have (or seek) private information, encrypt it (or have it encrypted), (have it) wrap(ped) it in a
If you don't want the Government to watch what you are saying and/or doing, then don't give them anything to watch.
This isn't a Bush or Ashcroft thing... this is a technology thing. Any time technology is seen as capable of doing something, ANYTHING, you can bet someone will try do do so... without regard to whom is in charge.
The problem with socialism is that they always run out of other people's money. - Margaret Thatcher
If you really believed that, would you post such a thing to a public message board whose contents are archived by anyone (and everyone)?
So in your country, are the criminals and the law enforcement often one and the same?
Yep. Thought so.
"access to communications infrastructure they need to protect our nation."
This phrase has been used before. Interesting - I thought the terrorist threat came from outside - not inside?
Could it be because of the old lame Shogun effect? The common enemy. Protect yourself by paying me to find problems that should worry you.
Are we still free? Are we still allowed to think that we are free?
Beware of the killer tomatoes.....
You're not supposed to *read* the patriot act! You're supposed to listen to the hearsay and conjecture on slashdot!
Sheesh. Newbies...
I don't know what everyone is whining about here. If the FBI can convince a court that they should be reading your email, listening to your conversations, etc., then I probably *want them to do so*. Has anybody thought what would happen if the FBI had too *little* power? The results could be just as bad as if they have too much power IMHO.
"Ignorance more frequently begets confidence than does knowledge"
- Charles Darwin
Interesting thought, however, make sure you have a plan to somehow get all your drives, and CDR's bought in the US and smuggled up there somehow to avoid all the 'piracy' tarrifs they have there...
Actually that would be interesting...could you get around the tarriff laws, by having a US based office...and you just 'moved office supplies' between offices in US and Canada?
Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
What's wrong with mandatory body cavity searches? Unless you are participating in some criminal activity violating federal rules of contraband and controlled substances, how does this affect you?
Well, it's called 'innocent until proven guilty,' 'due process,' and 'unreasonable search and seizure.'
Not that America cares all that much about the Constitution; just wait until that bill passes which allows Congress to supercede the SCOTUS...
Checks and balances; here's the check, now my balance is bigger. Here's your new law, sir, would you like freedom fries with that?
Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
And people in Europe thought that they were safe from US-like patent laws but look at what's happening in EU now. Many US laws have tendency to migrate to other countries so if you want privacy, take a stand and fight for your rights insteading of just fleeing.
1f u c4n r34d th1s u r34lly n33d t0 g37 l41d
if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
Legal protections aren't enough. You have to technologically secure your communications.
As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
That is the crux of the issue. Yes it should be Ok to tap, if you get a signed court order from a judge. ( ie, having to make a case for the tap )
The problem is with these new 'taps' is that all the FBI/CIA/etc have to do is claim it has something to do with national security ( they dont even have to explain why ) and they get full access to your private transactions, papers, home, etc.
---- Booth was a patriot ----