Slashdot Mirror


Squeezebox MP3 Player Hacked to Play Video

Xenna writes "The Squeezebox MP3 Player has found a new application: With the Videobox software and some cabling it becomes a networked Video Player. This is the latest development to come out of the active community Slim Devices have managed to attract around their very hackable MP3 players. Only last week the SoftSqueeze software player was announced on the Slim users mailing list. The Squeezebox was reviewed on Slashdot last December."

150 comments

  1. Re:I don't know... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

    Oh, it relies on a local PC? So it's wireless? Wow, what a strange device. I'm interested in it...

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  2. Good. by James+A.+M.+Joyce · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It's gratifying to see a company which is aware of the "geek" segment of the market and is willing to produce intentionally hackable and extensible media players for us to play with. This can only be a good development and I hope they do well.

    1. Re:Good. by Lucius+Septimius+Sev · · Score: 1

      I hope so also but the fact is too often we see neet hacks and not enough time spent on making the orginal product better. For $299.00 its a nice price but the company looks pretty small and they are new so I hope they make it. With their third product we should know what type of shape they are in.

  3. know what you're talking about by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Informative

    THIS IS NOT A PORTABLE MP3 PLAYER

    this is a networked (wired or wifi) device to plug into your home hifi to stream music from your pc

    product overview

    1. Re:know what you're talking about by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's wifi, it's portable on some level.

      But yeah, the initial confusion hit me too. They should've mentioned what it was in the blurb.

      --

      ---
      Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
    2. Re:know what you're talking about by gstoddart · · Score: 1

      Which has apparently just become a PVR playback terminal if it's been hacked to play video.

      --
      Lost at C:>. Found at C.
  4. Re:Ogg support please... by LordK3nn3th · · Score: 2, Informative

    The MP3 player software itself is Windows Media Player. Ickles!

    --

    ---
    Never criticize religion on Slashdot. You will be modded down for "Troll" no matter how factual it is.
  5. Video player? More like "video remote" by perbu · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This software turns the slimbox into a remote - which is not really that cool. You still need a decent video player. Paying $250+ for a remote control for your video player is, well, a bit much.

    1. Re:Video player? More like "video remote" by Xenna · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yep, a (wireless/ethernet) video remote with a display. That's basically what it is.

      Mind you for that $250 you buy a great network audio player and the video remote stuff is just a free extra.

      The Squeezebox has digital outputs and can stream FLAC lossless compressed audio. Just add a really good external DAC ($$$) and the sound quality should satisfy any digital audiophile while doing away with ugly stacks of CD's.

      Do you have any idea how hard it is to satisfy an audiophile? ;-) That must be worth a few hundred bucks...

      Regards,
      Xenna

  6. Re:Ogg support please... by jas79 · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA's.
    It supports ogg according to the review from december.

  7. don't feed the troll by Neophytus · · Score: 5, Informative

    Audio formats:

    * PCM (AIFF, WAV)
    o Supports raw pass-through of uncompressed audio
    o Sample rates: 32, 44.1 (CD), and 48Khz (DAT)
    o Configurable sample rate, byte order, channels
    * MP3, MP2:
    o Built-in decoding for all MP3/MP2 formats
    o Supports all MP3 data rates, including VBR
    o Supports all MP3 sample rates
    * AAC, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis:
    o Supported through server-side decoding
    o May be streamed in PCM (raw) or MP3 (transcoded) format

    1. Re:don't feed the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but have you actually TRIED the ogg support? It sounds awful (being based on an early beta of the decoder) and will not handle some newer oggs. I have also had it lock up on me a couple of times. For all intents and purposes, the device doesn't have ogg support. It's a nice machine otherwise, though.

    2. Re:don't feed the troll by Neophytus · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i don't have the thing myself, so i couldn't tell

      because the ogg support is server-side rather than in the firmware isn't this able to be patched?

    3. Re:don't feed the troll by grahamsz · · Score: 1

      I'm running a fairly recent version of the server, and have a fairly recent set of oggtools (iirc), and it sounds great.

    4. Re:don't feed the troll by 87C751 · · Score: 3, Informative
      I do have the thing myself. :) (one of each, actually)

      Ogg support currently uses oggdec by default, though you can easily use any decoder that can write to stdout.

      --
      Mail? Put "slashdot" in the subject to pass the spam filters.
    5. Re:don't feed the troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It sounds awful (being based on an early beta of the decoder)

      Bullshit. It uses whatever ogg decoder you have installed.

  8. Story has got it all wrong by BKDotCom · · Score: 5, Informative

    Uh... I may be completely stupid but they are not playing video over the Squeeze. They're just using it as the IR receiver to control "Media Player" on a PC with "TV Out" Woo

    1. Re:Story has got it all wrong by Stuwee · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Indeed it would look like that to me as well. In the words of the Videobox site: "Just add a way to get your PC's Video & Audio signals to your living room TV set to transform your Squeezebox into a Video Player."

      It is a rather novel way to control things none the less, and with something like the suggested Trust Wireless Televiewer, you could stream video nicely through to your TV set from your PC sans-wires. In conclusion however, it doesn't look like a reason to rush out and buy a Squeezebox.

    2. Re:Story has got it all wrong by rockmuelle · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This definately appears to be the case. I read the post and hoped that they were actaully streaming video to the squeezebox and using some clever server hack to modulate the video signal and send it out over one of the audio channels. This is not the case at all. They're just using the Squeezebox as the remote control for a PC connected to the TV.

      While this isn't as exiciting, it's still a nifty hack. One of the great things about the Squeezebox is that its form factor and UI enable it to integreate seamlessly into an existing AV system. Not only does it look like an AV component, but it acts like one too. The UI is simple and it's easy to control with the remote control.

      Other hacks let you use the Squeezebox to check weather and stock quotes. If your PC is already connected to your computer and you have a Squeezebox, this hack lets you control your audio and video using one remote and the simple display provided by the Squeezebox. It's looks like it's a natural way to combine two similar things (audio and video) under one UI, even though the data paths are completely separate.

      So, even though it's not a streaming video hack, it's still a nifty hack.

      (it's worth noting that I'm a Squeezebox owner and love the hacks that people have done for it - the few times I've had a cool idea for it, someone's already done it! It's a great community and it's great that Slim Devices has opened up the software for tinkering.)

      -Chris

    3. Re:Story has got it all wrong by gabebear · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yep, pretty lame. My brother has been using X10's PC remote for a few years now to do the same thing(which has decent Linux support).

      Elgato just released EyeHome which streams audio/video from your Computer(Mac Only) via Ethernet to a TV for the same price. It looks sweet, XLR8YourMac has had a bunch of users review it. It only accepts Mpeg1, Mpeg2(non-VBR), and DIVX streams from their "EyeHome Media Server". The same company Sells nice firewire tuners with TIVO like software that incorporates into the setup.

      Seriously though, if you want a good TV frontend for your computer, get an Xbox and put Linux on it (no, you don't need to buy a mod-chip). It costs less than any other option and is a lot more flexable.

    4. Re:Story has got it all wrong by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      As I read your post I was getting intrigued and hoping for a link to these hacks..

      Help a brother out !

    5. Re:Story has got it all wrong by macgyvr64 · · Score: 1

      Or get an Xbox and stream video and audio to it using Xbox Media Center. It's cheaper than a SqueezeBox and has a far better UI.

    6. Re:Story has got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you don't need an xbox to run this software. you can run it on your linux pc. you probably want a tv out card, though.

    7. Re:Story has got it all wrong by gabebear · · Score: 1
      you probably want a tv out card, though

      kinda the point of using an Xbox. It's a very cheap PC with very good tv out. Getting tv-out that looks good isn't all that simple to setup even if you have a video card that supports it.

    8. Re:Story has got it all wrong by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your PC is already connected to your computer
      Does two PC's count? I don't have a Macintosh computer.

    9. Re:Story has got it all wrong by rockmuelle · · Score: 1

      Yeah, this is a few days late, but in case you haven't found it yet:

      http://www.slimdevices.com/dev_third_party.html

      The Slimdevices guys are really encouraging hacks and are hosting this list of links to them.

      -Chris

  9. Mama's got a Squeezebox by AtariAmarok · · Score: 5, Funny

    Mama's got a Squeezebox
    And when Daddy comes home
    He never gets no rest

    'Cause she's playing all night
    And the CODEC's all right
    Mama's got a Squeezebox
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    "Well the stuntman can't eat"
    says Valenti, who can't sleep
    When you play illegal DIVx
    Cuz it's so damn l33t

    'Cause she's playing all night
    And the movie's all right
    Mama's got a Squeezebox
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
    1. Re:Mama's got a Squeezebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That my friend, is genius!

    2. Re:Mama's got a Squeezebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well done.

  10. What Squeezebox is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
    People are comparing it to an iPod, and asking how much storage it has.

    Basically it is:

    A networked MP3 player

    Uses your computer to store MP3s - should have enough space for movies

    $249

    Looks about the size of an access point

    Plays ogg and flac

    1. Re:What Squeezebox is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Another reason why an iPod with WiFi capability would be kick-ass.

  11. Re:Yeah- momma's got a squeezebox by AtariAmarok · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...or if squeezebox was supposed to be slang for vagina. ....which she "wears on her chest"? Anatomy lessons all around, folks. Time to help out those folks whose only knowledge of female anatomy comes from all-night Tomb Raider sessions.

    --
    Don't blame Durga. I voted for Centauri.
  12. Is this useful? by sabNetwork · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It looks like all VideoBox does is turn your $300 Squeezebox into an LCD display showing the video filename. Woohoo, great, who cares?

    This isn't news until someone figures out how to make the Squeezebox stream the video.

    --

    1. Re:Is this useful? by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 1
      It enables you to start, stop, play, pause and change the video stream. It does seem a little pointless to me unless you are unable to run more than the video cable from the computer to the TV. This will allow the user to control their computer from the living room. So basically it will transmit the sound wirelessly, control the computer, but still requires the video to be on a wire.

      Not too bad

  13. Re:Ogg support please... by Mattwolf7 · · Score: 2, Informative
    Pulled from http://www.slimdevices.com/pi_specs.html

    Audio formats:
    * PCM (AIFF, WAV)
    o Supports raw pass-through of uncompressed audio
    o Sample rates: 32, 44.1 (CD), and 48Khz (DAT)
    o Configurable sample rate, byte order, channels
    * MP3, MP2:
    o Built-in decoding for all MP3/MP2 formats
    o Supports all MP3 data rates, including VBR
    o Supports all MP3 sample rates
    * AAC, FLAC, Ogg Vorbis
    o Supported through server-side decoding
    o May be streamed in PCM (raw) or MP3 (transcoded) format

  14. haha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    cann't get more fucking stupid than this lad. someone else posted it 5 minutes ago

    1. Re:haha by muzthe42nd · · Score: 0

      cann't get more fucking stupid than this lad. someone else posted it 5 minutes ago

      Oh yes you can, some eejit modded it up

      --
      Pfft - Sorry, what?
  15. Re:Yeah- momma's got a squeezebox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    oh yeah? what about the lines about it going "in and out and in and out"?

  16. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by v1 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    With all the flames for the iPod and its battery, I can't help but wonder.. do these people think that most consumer products with rechargeable batteries allow the batteries to be replaced easily, if at all? I just threw out a cordless screwdriver whose batteries stopped taking a charge, and there was no replacing them. A few months ago I threw away a rechargeable flashlight for the same reason. So what is it about the iPod that makes it deserve such relentless attacks? Do a google search on "ipod battery" and I'm sure you'll find dozens of sites that offer replacement batteries for the iPod, with detailed instructions on how to do the replacement - that's more than I can say for any of the rechargeable items I've thrown away in the past few years.

    --
    I work for the Department of Redundancy Department.
  17. This is... by jx100 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ..oddly reminiscent of the Rockbox project (which has also enabled an MP3 player to play video).

  18. Here... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
  19. Missing the point by platypussrex · · Score: 4, Informative

    Seems like people don't get it. Squeezebox sits in the room with your stereo and lets you remote control a stream of music from your computer (possibly in another room) to your stereo. The idea is that your HD can hold a lot of stuff but you might not want to walk into the other room to change programs.

    This hack lets you do the same with video stored on your computer. You sit in your home theatre room (or whatever) Squeezebox is already installed to do remote control on streamed audio, now you can do remote control on streamed video too.

    Usefull? Beats me, but at least understand what the product does.

    1. Re:Missing the point by mikewren420 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes, but with this hack, it requires the PC video be in the same room as the TV, or you have a really really long cable run... making this kind of a ho-hum addon.

  20. What's The Point??? by ferrellcat · · Score: 0, Informative

    Streaming MP3s wirelessly is cool. Using this device as a remote control for a video player that still requires a seperate link to move the video to your TV is just lame! For about the same price, I can mod an XBOX with Xbox Media Center that WILL do what this hack attempts to do. (and a WHOLE lot more)

  21. Interesting but still too expensive... by igrp · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Whilst this is interesting, especially the concept of having an easily hackable and adaptable MP3 device, at $249 for the wired and $299, respectively, for the wireless model, it's still way too expensive. And according to Froogle, the MSRP is pretty much what everyone else is charging.

    At $300, one could easily build a stripped-down PC system with the same functionality (and more flexibility).

    It also doesn't really look too cool either; more like like some standard CE set-top box so there's isn't really an "aesthetic incentive" to buy one of these either.

    1. Re:Interesting but still too expensive... by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      At ~$150 you also could buy an Xbox to play video and music with Xbox Media Center. Cheaper yet.

    2. Re:Interesting but still too expensive... by l0rd · · Score: 3, Informative

      While this is a nice hack, for the same price you can get a kiss dvd player which can already play divxs/mp3s/mp3 streams/mpgs etc. over your network.

      Also an added disadvatage is that you use a video card's tv out. This means that you don't get a full widescreen output to your TV.

      While I still think the slimp3 thins is really cool for what it does (play mp3s), it's still WAY to expensive. Maybe if the thing was $50 cheaper and properly supperted video the price would be worth it.

    3. Re:Interesting but still too expensive... by ricosalomar · · Score: 0
      The Squeezebox is the coolest AV thing I've seen in years. I don't have a TV or Stereo system in my living room; my house is too big to run the wires from my giant system downstairs. This thing is tiny, and with a decent set of powered speakers (I use ARs), I can put music wherever I want it for way less than the price of an amp. Friends over, out on the deck? Drag it out there and plug in the power and, BAM, 6.8 quazillion songs.

      I suppose I could have a big beige 486 with a 15" monitor grinding away in the corner. Or I could have this tiny, extremely well-built, fan-less, silent box sitting on a shelf somewhere.

      I don't work for them or anything, but if you haven't seen one of these in action, don't be too rash to judge it. All of my geek friends freak out when they see it. All of my non-geek friends just sort of haze over while I try to explain it to them. How perfect is that?

    4. Re:Interesting but still too expensive... by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

      Actually that whole directory is indexed, and there are some cool pictures

      SlimDevices SlimDevices

  22. Not a video player by frostman · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sorry, no. It does not become a video player.

    It seems it becomes a remote control with a nice LED display.

    You still have to "add a way to get your PC's Video & Audio signals to your living room
    TV set." ( that's from the link )

    It's a cool use of the box, but since the box itself is not actually playing the video or outputting the video (or even the audio) signal, they shouldn't call it a video player.

    --

    This Like That - fun with words!

  23. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by blackeye · · Score: 2, Informative
  24. Wow - iPod better than iPod!! by SuperKendall · · Score: 1

    Considering that you can either have it fixed, or buy a new battery and install it yourself - or simply not have the problem (still using old 5GB iPod years later with no issues on original battery) then I guess the iPod is actually better even than itself!! I knew it was good, but that is amazing.

    What other MP3 player can you buy that's better than itself? None I say! Hurray for the iPod!!

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  25. Read and Decide: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Squeeze Box" - The Who

    Mama's got a squeeze box
    She wears on her chest
    And when Daddy comes home
    He never gets no rest

    Aside from the 'wears it on her chest' line, this makes sense. Note 'squeeze' box.

    'Cause she's playing all night
    And the music's all right
    Mama's got a squeeze box
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    She's having sex all night, and 'the music' is the bedsprings and/or her moaning

    Well the kids don't eat
    And the dog can't sleep
    There's no escape from the music
    In the whole damn street

    Obviously the family is disturbed by this constant sex, and either it is so loud they hear it on the street, or it haunts them and they can never escape it.

    'Cause she's playing all night
    And the music's all right
    Mama's got a squeeze box
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    Already talked about this one...

    She goes in and out and in and out and in and out and in and out

    Uhhhhhh.....

    She's playing all night
    And the music's all tight
    Mama's got a squeeze box
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    Seen it before...

    She goes, squeeze me, come on and squeeze me
    Come on and tease me like you do
    I'm so in love with you
    Mama's got a squeeze box
    Daddy never sleeps at night

    Sounds like mama's beggin' for sex.

    She goes in and out and in and out and in and out and in and out

    Uhhhhhhhhhhhhhh.....

    'Cause she's playing all night
    And the music's all right
    Mama's got a squeeze box
    Daddy never sleeps at night


    Netcraft confirms: 'Mama's Got a Squeezebox' is about a horny woman and her vagina.

    1. Re:Read and Decide: by Mattintosh · · Score: 1

      "Squeezebox" is a slang term for a small (usually octagonal or hexagonal) accordion. It has also been applied to a full size accordion at times. The definition at dictionary.reference.com simply states, "An accordion."

      In light of this, it's easy to see why a squeezebox would be on her chest. Frequently, accordions (especially the bigger ones) would be supported by a strap worn around the neck (similar to a guitar) due to their size and weight coupled with the fact that your hands are not free to support the saggy center section.

      Most accordion music is dance music, usually polka or creole styles. If "mama" plays the accordion all night and "daddy" dances to it, obviously, they're not going to be sleeping.

      The music is just that... music... coming from the accordion.

      Accordions can be quite loud, so the kids and even the neighbors might have trouble sleeping.

      The motion necessary for getting sound from an accordion could be aptly described as "in and out." Additionally, the song says "She goes in and out," which seems a bit odd if they were describing sexual intercourse.

      As for the "tease me" and "so in love" parts... all I can say is that maybe she's playing love songs to him.

      Think of a poor, pre-industrial age family, here. It wouldn't be uncommon for this scene to play out from time to time. The kids don't have a Nintendo to play, so they dance, sing, play music, and find other ways of entertaining themselves for an evening. An accordion was a cheap (compared to something like a piano) instrument that even a poor family might have, and it was also a means of entertainment in an age where instantaneous entertainment wasn't really available.

      Your explanation doesn't really seem to fit... unless you're just trying to find something sexual about the song.

    2. Re:Read and Decide: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I was just saying it COULD be interpereted as sexual innuendo. Sometimes words have two meanings.

  26. Most do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    "do these people think that most consumer products with rechargeable batteries allow the batteries to be replaced easily, if at all? "

    I've got a digital camera that takes rechargable batteries. There is an easy-to-move switch that locks the battery hold. After you use this, it is easy.

    "A few months ago I threw away a rechargeable flashlight for the same reason. So what is it about the iPod that makes it deserve such relentless attacks?"

    Are you richer than Trump? Compare the price of the flashlight and the price of the iPod.

  27. Re:Ogg support please... by GarthSweet · · Score: 1

    Whenever you Ogg guys read a music related post. Try substituting the word Beta wherever Ogg occurs and the word VHS where ever the word MP3 occurs. I think you will quickly get a better picture of your present situation and your ultimate future. Maybe then you will stop whining and use the wonderful array of products available instead of bitterly complaining about all the BETA tapes you own.

  28. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just threw out a cordless screwdriver

    A cordless screwdriver? I didn't know screwdrivers had cords in the first place.

  29. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes, the parent to your post was a troll, though not a very good one.

    Why are you throwing things out when their rechargable batteries die? Just because there isn't an easily accessable battery compartment doesn't mean you can't open it up and replace the batteries anyway.

  30. Cordless hammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Yes. You can use a cordless hammer to smash open your cordless screwdriver and replace the batteries.

    I tried it once, however, and had no luck. None of my cordless screwdrivers turned out to have batteries once I smashed them to bits. They were all solid inside.

  31. Re:Ogg support please... by unts · · Score: 1

    Ah, well it's good to see Unreal Tournament 2k3/4 running on Betamax!

  32. SHUT UP ASSWIPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    [ The text of this comment has been donated to the Project For A New American Century ]
  33. yes but... by neko9 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    does it run l... ahh, nevermind.

  34. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by loraksus · · Score: 1

    Why?
    Because it is "cool" to whine about products that they have no chance of buying because mommy won't increase their allowance.

    That said, it would be nice to be able to swap ipod batteries out (like batteries in a cell phone).

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  35. Easy. by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Cordless screwdrives don't cost 300 USD. People expect more from a high dollar product sold by a company with a reputation of producing quality products.

  36. Other Slimp3 software by beevan_jedi · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's a list on the SlimDevices website, and there's also an alternative (GPL'd) audio server

  37. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by dave420 · · Score: 2, Informative
    It's AC powered, numbnuts. I mean, it's fine to be first up slamming a device, but please get your facts right first. It's a network device, not a portable audio player. It has no storage. It's designed to be put in one place and left to it. Sheesh.

    I know this is slashdot, but please...

  38. Re:HOWTO: Be an American! In full color! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and you still continue to save our asses...
    Iraq, Yugoslavia, Afganistan, Iraq(2)
    thanks, but no thanks

  39. It actually does look cool by grahamsz · · Score: 3, Informative

    I wasn't too impressed with the pictures online, but in reality it looks very cool.

    It's very well made, with a soft-touch rubberized finish - and it's tiny. It easily sits on top of the wave radio that we usually use it with.

  40. I love my Squeezeboxen! by Brackney · · Score: 4, Informative

    I ordered a Squeezebox after reading the /. story posted back in December, and I'm glad I did. I've since added a second box in my house and my Dad bought one too. It's a terrific interface that makes my music collection available anywhere in the house. Slimdevices along with the development community has been great at fixing bugs and enhancing the functionality of the server software and unit firmware. Check 'em out!

  41. Re:Russian's negative role in WW2 by Marty200 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Churchill would've been gassed if it hadn't been for the US.

    Thank god for the americans. You know the rest of the world shouldn't have bothered trying. We could have just waited for the americans to get off there asses and sit and watch hitler murder people for a few years too.

    MG

    Fucking Anonymous Cowards.

    --

    Randomly distributing Karma whenever possible.

  42. Re:Ogg support please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That review you pointed out was the stuidest thing I've read in months. Barely mentions Ogg, and dosen't give it a favorable view at all, and furthermore reccomends people use MP3PRO (ICK!) at 56kbs (even more ICK!) for all of their portable music needs.

    Even the early oggenc betas produced better low bitrate sounds than I've ever heard from MP3PRO. this guy's on crack.

  43. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by Amorpheus_MMS · · Score: 1

    That the community is compensating a compromise somewhat, or that others compromise as well, doesn't mean it has to be acceptable for everybody. Many people use the iPod probably haven't even thought about it. Many people probably haven't bought an iPod for that reason. What's the problem? So Apple gets flak for a compromise many geeks don't agree with. Cope.

  44. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by igrp · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Well, for one thing, it's an easy subject to "karmawhore" about. By now, everbody and their mother have heard about the "iPod battery problem" and many /.'ers have a tendency to be rather fond and/or supportive of Apple. So, I guess, for many trolls it just makes for good flamebait. It also allows them to follow up to their own posting with a link to some replacement battery manufacturer and therefore karmawhore some more.

    On a related note though, I can understand the people complaining about it, at least to a point. I've had to have the Li-Ion battery of my PDA replaced twice (under warranty though). For most people, spending $400 on a CE item isn't exactly something trivial so they tend to expect their "invest" to just work. That's why I bought an extended warranty plan (well, the fact, that it the extended warranty was $15 extra did kinda help ;).

  45. eyeHome instead? by SoftwareJuggler · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since this just makes the $250 Squeezebox a really expensive remote for you 'puter, you might want to consider some other products instead.

    If want you want is just a remote for your computer, then the Keyspan Digital Media Remote provides a $40 dollar alternative.

    If you want to stream video to you TV from your Mac, then El Gato's eyeHome will pull this off at the same price as the Squeezebox. It will also stream music from iTunes and do slideshows from iPhoto, with no hacking required. ( I know.. what's the fun in that :) )

    If you want to wait for Microsoft Announceware, you could get the Windows Media Center Extender for XBOX and use the XBOX to stream video to your TV.

    Or at ~$150 you could get the Linksys Wireless Media Adapter . This is the first round of Intel's Digital Media Adapters , of which there is a good review of the technology at linuxdevices.com

    --
    Enjoy -jim
    1. Re:eyeHome instead? by sith · · Score: 1

      I got an eyeHome last week and I must say it's fantastic. Check out the xlr8 feedback at:
      http://www.xlr8yourmac.com/feedback/eyehome_review .html

      Plus, even though you don't *have* to hack it, you definitely can... it's all XML and such.

    2. Re:eyeHome instead? by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      My WinTV card came with sensor and remote control.. using my palm m505 as remote now tho.

    3. Re:eyeHome instead? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      Your keyspan remote only works when your PC is in the same room as you.

      Some for eyeHome if I understand correctly.

      The XBOX is an interesting option, I've thought of getting one. I didn't because I heard they're noisy bastards. I want my rooms quiet...

      The Wireless Media adapter is nice for displaying your photo's (something Videobox does not yet do) but not movies.

      I wanted to watch Video on my TV's in my living, kitchen, bedroom and office but my PC is (and stays) in the attic. Videobox, a couple of Squeezeboxes (that I had for playing music anyway) and a little programming did the trick.

      It really does work extremely well and it's almost invisible. A tiny green display next to my TV is the only visible sign of the fact that I have a huge library of music and video online.

      The posters who complained the article text was not correct (I'm the author of both the software and the article)have a point. But in this age of virtualism, it really appears as if that tiny Squeezebox is playing the video. "The network is the medium"

      Regards,
      Xenna

    4. Re:eyeHome instead? by SoftwareJuggler · · Score: 1

      Greets Xenna

      The eyeHome hooks up to your PC through ethernet so it most decidely does not need to be in the same room as the Mac. Latency issues asside it doesn't even need to be in the same building or country. Unfortunately for most people, it is only able to use a Mac as it's server source. Some hacking may be able to fix that, but I haven't seen that done yet.

      As for the Wireless Media Adapter, that will teach me to pay more attention to the demos rather than the specs. I was at a Intel Developer Conference about 6 months ago, where they were demoing their "Digital Media Adapter" strategy and were demoing TVs playing video streamed over 802.11b from PCs. It looks like this hasn't completely developed yet.

      My problem with your Squeezebox solution is the extra video cable that needs to be strung from the PC to the TV. This seems less elegant than using a network connection to stream the video, and more succeptible to signal degradation and interference. However, it sounds like it works well for you and in the end that is what matters.

      --
      Enjoy -jim
    5. Re:eyeHome instead? by Xenna · · Score: 1

      How do you control the eyeHome from a (or multiple) remote location(s)? Because silly as it seems, that is usually a fairly hard problem to solve elegantly. Using a Wifi laptop/pda as an RC isn't bad but I prefer a Squeezebox personally.

      In the Intel vein you have products like the Pinnacle ShowCenter that look nice but have their own disadvantages. You need a box for every TV and you're stuck with the formats the manufacturer wants you to have. If you want DivX or XviD or tomorrows latest format you're out of luck. My solutions handles every codec available for WMP and could be fairly easily adapted for different players (RealMedia) or different platforms (OS/X).

      The video cable problem is indeed a problem, but I solved that by using a A/V over CAT5 solution. That's reasonably cheap and the quality is just excellent. Serving multiple TV's is done with a TV modulator (this is all detailed on my site).

      My solution has it's own advantages and disadvantages but in my particular situation it's (not surprisingly) the best solution available.

      Not counting the PC & TV's I spent all of $769 (1 SliMP3 at $250, 1 Sqzbx at $300, the AV over CAT5 baluns at $120, the TV modulator at $99) and ended up with a unique whole house audio & video system.

      Look up some of the available whole house audio systems and you'll see that's not such a bad deal ;-)

      Regards,
      Xenna

    6. Re:eyeHome instead? by SoftwareJuggler · · Score: 1

      How do you control the eyeHome from a (or multiple) remote location(s)? Because silly as it seems, that is usually a fairly hard problem to solve elegantly. Using a Wifi laptop/pda as an RC isn't bad but I prefer a Squeezebox personally.

      The eyeHome sits next to the TV, comes with it's own IR remote control, and talks over ethernet to the Mac. It is basically an enhanced version of the Squeezebox (minus the front display) - The input jack is Cat5 - the Output jacks are various video and audio outputs. It relies on server software running on the Mac to serve the vaious files that it can consume (MPG, JPG, MP3, AAC, HTML) to it, just like the Sqzbx relies on server software on the PC or SliMP3 to serve the audio stream to it. So the eyeHome provides the mechanism for remote control as much a the Sqzbox is.

      If you want DivX or XviD or tomorrows latest format you're out of luck. My solutions handles every codec available for WMP and could be fairly easily adapted for different players (RealMedia) or different platforms (OS/X).

      This is definitely a point in favor of your solution that I hadn't considered. Because you have video being rendered on the PC, to handle a new format you only need to update the software on the PC. In order for eyeHome to handle a new format you would have to wait for ElGato to issue a firmware update (or not be issued and be SOL).

      You need a box for every TV

      The above comment was about the Pinnacle ShowCenter (thanks for the link BTW), but applies equally to the eyeTV. The counter point to this is that you could have multiple eyeHomes (or ShowCenters) hooked up to different TV's all watching different movies at the same time. Assuming of course your network and Mac can handle the bandwidth of serving the data. BTW You don't have to dedicate the Mac to the solution. It just has to be on the network, always on and have lots of storage, but you can still use the Mac itself as someone's computer. (I don't know how realistic this would be in actual use, however).

      Also your statement is not quite true. Just as you added a TV modulator into your system to distribute the video for all the TVs. You could put a TV modulator at the output of the eyeTV or ShowCenter as well and end up with something close to your system (minus the format support).

      --
      Enjoy -jim
  46. thats a cute hack ... by torpor · · Score: 1, Informative

    ... but by christmas, cheap ($200) video-playing 'ipod killers' are gonna hit the market.

    the majority of these -already- run linux.

    --
    ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
  47. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0p

    HEY You stole my password!

  48. Churchill? Don't you mean Attlee? by mangu · · Score: 1
    The socialist PM who gave Eastern Europe away to the Soviets wasn't Churchill. Attlee and Roosevelt, whose economic policy in the 1930's would be called far-left today, were the leaders who let Stalin do his bidding.


    Churchill simply did what was possible in his time. The way he stood up to Hitler in 1940, when everything seemed lost, using his words alone, is IMHO one of the most outstanding examples of leadership in any age.

  49. Re:Russian's negative role in WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just a few years ago, France had massive antisemitic "Down with the Jews" rallies

    You may support what Isreal does, but I don't. So fuck you, Jew.

  50. Worth mentioning I think is by kayen_telva · · Score: 1

    that the slimserver is cross platform, and you don't need a squeezebox to play the streams.
    WinAmp/GQAmp/XMMS/??? work great.

    I dont own a squeezbox YET, but the slimp3 server is available to any
    friends/family that come over with a laptop and want to listen (wirelessly).

  51. Re:Yeah- momma's got a squeezebox by seanadams.com · · Score: 3, Funny

    Time to help out those folks whose only knowledge of female anatomy comes from all-night Tomb Raider sessions.

    I think this illustration should help to clear up any confusion as to where the squeezebox is located.

  52. Re:OP is a dunderhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How sad is it that the original submitter didn't even take the 10 fucking seconds required to realize that this "hack" turns the Squeezebox into a remote control, not a video player?

    You asswipe. The original submitter is the author.

  53. Re:Ogg support please... by dasmegabyte · · Score: 1

    ogg needs to start advertising.

    Yes. They would only need to use a small portion of their budget. Let's see...what's ten percent of fuck all?

    And this is exactly why OGG is, and will remain, a stalled format. With nobody to promote it, and everybody who might care about it already enabled by other technologies (MP3/AAC/WMA) that are intensly marketed and aren't prohibitively expensive, there's little reason to use Vorbis. I re-ripped my whole collection to AAC when I realized it was support by every platform I use AND had industry support besides, guaranteeing it wouldn't be a dead format.

    OGG isn't even the Betamax of the group. Betamax had SONY behind it. OGG is more like, I dunno, reel to reel.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  54. Re:Russian's negative role in WW2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No idea why I am replying to this.. but I am it seems..

    > You may support what Isreal does, but I don't. So fuck you, Jew.

    Is it that difficult to distinguish between jews in general and the state of Israel?

    And to all those who support the actions of the state of Israel, is it that difficult to distinguish between a pallestinian and a terrorist?

  55. Re:Russian's negative role in WW2 by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    > America led the charge to end this as well. Europe as a whole thought that what Serbia was doing was "OK", just as many Europeans in the 1940s thought that despite Hitler's flaws, it was good that he was solving the Jewish problem.

    Nice rewriting of history. I suggest you keep locked up in your over nationalistic propaganda. You may want to realize tho that it is people like you who in fact cause situations like the one in Serbia or in the 1940s. Its blind hatred of that what is different.

  56. Amazing.. by StarfishOne · · Score: 0

    How they squeezed video out of that Squeezebox.

    Guess it's all in the name ;)

  57. change Title to "blah...Hacked to CONTROL the play by Locutus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The title of this should be changed to read

    blah...Hacked to CONTROL the play of video

    This "hack" is just a way to used the remote control and display of the Squeezebox to control a PC's video playback. This is not really news worthy IMHO since the advantage of the Squeezebox is that you are not near your PC and can play your MP3's still. If you've got a PC connected to your TV, use the TV display to control the video for goodness sake. It'll be right there in front of you and far easier to see and use since there are many remote PC controllers already out.

    BTW, a Sharp Zaurus can play SAMBA mounted directories over WiFi. Shoutcast could feed the audio stream and external speakers to amplify the sound...

    LoB

    --
    "Anyone who stands out in the middle of a road looks like roadkill to me." --Linus
  58. Re:Ogg support please... by theguywhosaid · · Score: 1

    vorbis vs. mp3 is an issue that can usually be solved in software, and there are hardware decoding solutions out there. vhs vs. beta was about hardware, which means you have to buy a new physical thing. adding vorbis support is simple in software products, and simple in hardware players. you dont even need floating point support. the complaint is that with minimal effort a free open standard could be supported.

    this product sort of supports ogg vorbis, but certainly not on the same level as it does mp3. making the "server" decode it and send PCM is way more overhead than just streaming the file. its more computation for the server and its more bandwidth usage.

  59. Re:OP is a dunderhead. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm... So I guess there's even LESS of an excuse for his misrepresentation of the thing in his original submission.

  60. Re:Apple does not have quality reputation by aldoman · · Score: 1

    Hmm, yea. USB2 and Firewire are definitely not standard. Neither is 802.11b or g and ethernet...

  61. I use a cheaper alternative ... by danwiz · · Score: 1
    I bought an Irock from RadioShack for $30. I plug it into the back of my PC, prime WinAmp with a playlist, and I can receive music through any FM stereo in my house.

    The sound quality isn't perfect, but it works great for when I'm moving throughout the house. It also doubles as a transmitter from my CD walkman to my (cheap) car stereo.

    I know that the Squeezebox has added features, such as a display and a remote, but I can go wireless from PC to stereo for only $30.

  62. Don't re-write history by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Nice rewriting of history. I suggest you keep locked up in your over nationalistic propaganda"

    It is not a re-write. It is what happened. Nothing to do with "nationalism"

    " You may want to realize tho that it is people like you who in fact cause situations like the one in Serbia or in the 1940"

    You must have not read. It is quite clear that I oppose the root cause of situations like Serbia and Nazi Germany.

    1. Re:Don't re-write history by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Ok, first of all, 'nationalism'. Yeah, there is a bit of assumption there, but the thign you wrote is very popular among the same group who believes in 'the new American Century', and serve as propaganda to make America look better then it really is.

      It is also a gross over simplification of reality at the very least not to say its plainly wrong.

      So, to correct your 'facts':
      - France didn't just sit and do nothing while being invaded. What they did was not very succesfull tho. Also that is no reason to claim that a majority of the population of Europe supported what happened to the jews, at best the majority did not actively oppose it.
      - Europe failed to intervene in Serbia, but that was not exactly because they thought it was ok. Followign that reasoning, I guess the USA thought it ok that milions were killed in Rwanda?

      It seems to me that you are unable to differentiate between facts and your personal interpretation of reasons.

      Last but not least, racism is an evil that is happening in many places, but not every ethnic conflict finds its cause in racism. It is easy to call racism whenever there is a conflict between 2 groups of people from a different race, but very often the underlying reasons have a lot more to do with religion and culture then with race. Not that those are good reasons for waging war, but when looking at why a problem exists, it is a good idea to not be blinded by a pre-determined explanation.

      Bottomline, you state both fact and opinion, while not in any way substantiating how you derive opinion from fact while also part of your facts are wrong.

  63. Anti-Israeli = anti-semitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course, a demo against Israel in which the main reason they are against Israel is that Israel is perceived to be Jewish, is, indeed, an antisemitic demo.

    This particular demo even trotted out the old "Jews control the banks and media" lies and used swastika and similar hate symbols. Yes, the irrational hatred of Israelis goes along with hatred of Jews in general.

    1. Re:Anti-Israeli = anti-semitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, Israel certainly represents "the Jews". At least that's what they say themselves. So, if they fuck up, the group they represent fucks up. It's that easy.

    2. Re:Anti-Israeli = anti-semitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well if your Squeezebox MP3 Player hack to play video doesn't work, you can blame the Jews, because they control everything, and are therefore responsible for every fault!!!@@!@!!!!11

    3. Re:Anti-Israeli = anti-semitic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ROTFL, best post I read today, thanks!

  64. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by gdavidp · · Score: 0

    Probably something to do with the fact that a Cordless screwdriver or flashlight doesn't cost $4xx.00 (for the most expensive iPod model).

  65. Gameshark Media Player by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you have Playstation 2 with network adapter, take a look at the Gameshark Media Player.
    It uses a Java based server to stream media.
    Known to work on OSX, Linux, BSD (don't remember flavor), and of course recent Microsoft OSes.

    I find it a little slow to boot up, but at least I don't have to drag my PC across the house to watch Divx or listen to my ripped music.

  66. Re:Ogg support please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    My Anonymous Modifier is set at -1, so register if you have something to say.

    But I didn't post this FOR YOU!

  67. If you have a PS2 you can use that for video... by JamieF · · Score: 2, Interesting

    If you're wishing that there were a device that did what the headline suggests that this hack does (that is, play AVIs and stuff without a PC doing all the work) then you might want to look into this.

    I bought an early release of the BroadQ QCast software (which I believe is now sold as the Mad Catz GameShark Media Player) for the PS2. It's pretty interesting - you have to get the PS2 network adapter so that your PS2 has ethernet, and then you also have to run the Java based streaming server app on the server that has all your media files on it. Once you've done that, you run this software and it lets you browse and play your audio and video media.

    Initially I was pretty disappointed in the video performance. Basically most of the movies I had wouldn't play (either due to codec incompatibility, or the codec not being able to keep up with the frame rate) and especially because there was no fast-forward or rewind. A later release fixed most of those issues including the FF/RW.

    It's still kinda cool but I'm sort of over my movie-ripping phase and back to DVDs so I don't use it that much. To be honest it's fairly cumbersome to get it all set up, so unless you really want to watch a lot of non-DVD digital video on your TV, it's probably not worth it. But you might find that this is a good audio solution with the bonus of movie playback.

    Tom's Hardware has a review that's concurrent with my initial experiences:
    http://www.arstechnica.com/reviews/0 03/qcast/qcast -3.html

  68. Re:HOWTO: Be an American! In full color! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How about marking this as Redundant? I've seen this post before...

  69. it can be off-topic and flamebait at the same time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check and Mate.

  70. bad write-up by fikx · · Score: 1

    The headline for this one is pretty bad. The device is not an MP3 player. The hack is not even for the device itself. It's for the open-source server software. Now it can be used send remote commands to control video playback on a server PC. Neat hack, but not useful for ANYTHING the headline talks about.

    As a side note, not mentioned, but should be possible is using this hack to control a PC's video playback from many different sources. The server software can be controled from browsers, winamp, etc. Right? Anyone know if this can be plugged into that?

    --
    AB HOC POSSUM VIDERE DOMUM TUUM
    1. Re:bad write-up by Xenna · · Score: 1

      My own headline was 'Squeezebox Video Player Hack' which - although far from complete - is more correct than wat CowboyNeal made of it.

      You can control the PC's video playback from many different squeezeboxes simultaneously as well as from the included VB-Remote application and the new SoftSqueeze 'software Squeezebox'. Web browsers won't work, although they could fairly easily be added. WinAmp can't control any part of the Slim stuff as it is, it can just listen to the streams.

      Actually the Slimserver software wasn't hacked but I just created a plugin for it that resends the remote control's signals over ethernet.

      The VB-Player app. receives the RC signals and controls a WMP ActiveX control. Feedback is sent - thru the existing Slimserver's http interface - to the Squeezebox display.

      X.

  71. Here's the proof by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  72. Those French again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and serve as propaganda to make America look better then it really is.

    "Propaganda" is a meaningless word, which you use to describe facts and information that you just happen to not like. The facts are the facts, regardless of the "new century" stuff which I have not bothered to peruse (since it matters little).

    France didn't just sit and do nothing while being invaded

    No, they didn't just sit by. They happily helped their Nazi brothers and turned on Jews for them. It is part of a mean streak that runs through France today. This is the same country that had a massive "Down with the Jews" rally just a few years ago.

    I guess the USA thought it ok that milions were killed in Rwanda?

    This reminds me of the same French again. They parrticipated in the Rwanda genocide and sided with the perpetrators.

    Bottomline, you state both fact and opinion

    The fact I state is the actual history. The opinion is whether I think it is good or bad.

    while also part of your facts are wrong.

    You have yet to show any. Try again....

    1. Re:Those French again by SillyNickName4me · · Score: 1

      How about you first proving your facts instead?

      On another note, there are more opinions then good/bad.

      Propaganda is the proper term for your post, it is simplistic and meant to trigger emotion and prevent reason. That formula is well known and is very recognizable by anyone who for example has looked into what happened during the cold war or in nazi germany.
      Incidentely, the Bush government has used it very succesfully to prepare the American population for the Iraq war also.

  73. Re:Sounds better than the iPod by Moonpie+Madness · · Score: 1

    i had the same thing happen with my flashlight (ten bucks) and my screwdriver (five bucks) and even with my iron (50$) the ipod cost a lot more, and its very very wasteful of some very expensive components for zero reason. its frustrating that something will expire so quickly.

  74. How about a streaming audio device? by TokyoGuy · · Score: 1

    I've been looking for a device which can either play streaming audio (for example Shoutcast) directly or connect to my stereo. Right now I use an old notebook but the fan can be a bit annoying. I would like something that is fanless and as inexpensive as possible. Wireless would be a nice option if possible to cut down on the tangle of wires. Thanks in advance. One comment: Some guy mentioned that a moderately priced dinner for 2 in Tokyo was something like $250. I would beg to differ. I live and work in Tokyo as a hard working sysadmin and can get a moderately priced dinner for 2 with wine, coffee, and dessert for around $150. Its probably just a difference in the definition of "moderate." Restaurant food here can be more expensive but its not that out of line.

    1. Re:How about a streaming audio device? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Buy a modded xbox and you can stream all you want. It can even stream from a Replay box on your network.

  75. So, $249 for this is cool when for $199 you can... by TheConfusedOne · · Score: 1

    get an 802.11g wireless DVD player that already streams video from Gateway.

    They upgraded from b to g to give the bandwidth to stream video AND it's a progressive DVD player too. OK, so maybe SlimDevices gets the cool "geek" factor, but really shouldn't we look at the device that has more functionality for less $$$'s?

    (Prepares for the avalanche of "you don't read SlashDot do you?" responses...)

    --
    --- I wish I could hear the soundtrack to my life. That way I'd know when to duck.
  76. Why wait? by gpinzone · · Score: 1

    If you want to wait for Microsoft Announceware, you could get the Windows Media Center Extender for XBOX and use the XBOX to stream video to your TV.

    Or install modchip and do it today.

  77. theme song submittle... by LifesABeach · · Score: 0

    "Mama's got a squeeze box She wears on her chest And when Daddy comes home He never gets no rest ..."

    i just hope the f.c.c. doesn't figure out what the song is REALLY about.