Slashdot Mirror


Spread The Love (And Pay Us)

Digitus1337 writes "Wired has an article up about a new online service known as 'FunHi.' You sign up and join a community, and give your fellows gifts, but as Wired has reported, 'these are not ordinary gifts. They're purely digital: little flashing icons of cars, planes, diamond rings and other virtual representations of expensive items included in messages members send each other. And FunHi members don't seem to care that the real money they're spending on the gifts, at prices as high as $30 an item, is going straight into the company's coffers." This leaves just one question unanswered... why didn't I think of this?" It sounds like an April Fool's Joke, but then, so does online trading of Everquest loot.

35 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. wow... by AssProphet · · Score: 5, Insightful


    FunHI - yet another reason capitalism should come with a warning

  2. Status symbols by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suppose a real diamond ring is a status symbol, as is using a $10 bill to light your cigar.

    So too is throwing your money away with a virtual gift. let them who want to, do it.

    1. Re:Status symbols by jkabbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suppose a real diamond ring is a status symbol

      Agreed. Buying a diamond is saying "here DeBeers, have some money" just so other people can see that you gave DeBeers lots of money. It's simply a more socially accepted method of throwing your money away.

    2. Re:Status symbols by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the perfect woman would accept a pearl necklace. On a nightly basis.

    3. Re:Status symbols by Tim+Browse · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, sure. Diamonds are real scarce.

    4. Re:Status symbols by neurojab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >This may surprise you but some people actually think diamonds are nice to look at and that's why they buy them. It has nothing to do with status symbols.

      Yeah right. Diamonds look nice, but so do countless other less expensive gemstones. Diamonds do have status associated with them, and that status and "tradition" is due to being propped up by DeBeers. If people just wanted to buy something that looked nice, why do wedding rings always have to have diamonds in them? Surely a few people must think a ring looks just fine without having to be diamond-encrusted, or perhaps prefer emeralds, opals, or rubies.

      The previous poster is quite right about the diamond cartel, your positive feelings about diamonds are in no small part due to their propoganda.

      >Then again, you've probably never even spoken to a girl so you have no idea.

      It's possible the previous poster has never spoken to a girl. It's also possible he talks to intelligent women instead of wasting his time on materialistic girls.

    5. Re:Status symbols by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a) Cubic zirconium looks just as good. Many other gems that cost less actually look better.

      b) Even if you have specially trained eyes that can actually tell the difference, and you have some strange need for the diamonds, then modern industrially produced diamonds are actually more pure then mined ones. You need a microscope to tell the difference, and when you do, you rule out the man made one because it is too perfect. Yet the gemstones that DeBeer's has managed to manipulate you into buying are all mined - simply because they are about status rather than beauty.

  3. Personally... by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'd love you more if you just gave me the money...

  4. On the plus side... by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... maybe the people who are prepared to pay out cash for virtual items will be so busy trading their nonexistent gifts they won't have time to breed, and the average IQ will go up. At the very least, it should keep the terminally gullible out of circulation.

    1. Re:On the plus side... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
      And perhaps this will drain their coffers so they can't spend this money on spam. God, just wait till the spammers catch onto this......

      "Buy an animated gif of a penis up to 3" longer than yours! Guaranteed! $50"

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  5. Like.... by bitchell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like purchasing a square on the moon. Whats the point.

    A fool and their money are soon parted.

    1. Re:Like.... by strictnein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It probably won't, but it could - especially if you buy it for a child and they keep it into adulthood.

      Except for the people who are "selling" land on the moon, have no legal right to do so, and therefore you are just giving money to them as an example of your own stupidity.

  6. Amazing by mr.henry · · Score: 4, Funny
    This reminds me of a line from Larouche in Adaptation:

    I'm training myself on the internet. It's fascinating. I'm doing pornography. It's amazing how much these suckers will pay for photographs of chicks. And it doesn't matter if they're fat or ugly or what.

    Paying for crappy porn.. that's bad. But paying 30 bucks for a stupid icon? These people are dumber than that guy that loves his spam.

  7. More proof that... by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A fool and their money soon part. Capitalism seems to make this easier, and the internet makes it EVEN easier. I say good for this company, if an idiot wants to spend $30 on a picture of a ring, let him, it is no less idiotic than spending a couple grand on a real one.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    1. Re:More proof that... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Funny
      I find myself wondering what will happen if the recipient of the icon of the diamond ring starts copying and distributing those icons.

      Suddenly, fake diamond-ring-icons will threaten the natural diamond-ring-icon cartel, and FunHi will have to spend millions researching and building devices for distinguishing between the natural and fake icons; millions more advertising that only "Natural Diamond-Ring-Icons" show real love.

      You see ... you cynics ... ripping off the gullible is not just the fast-track to the gravy train. Getting a sustainable revenue channel by scamming the soft-of-the-brain is harder than it looks.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  8. Looks like they ripped their rating system... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their buzz system (scroll down) is a direct ripoff of eBay's feedback system. Wonder how long they get sued for that?

  9. Much ado about nothing... by bc90021 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    "Selman says FunHi has banked about $10,000 in the month since FunHi launched. And given that Georgiades himself has paid about 10 percent of that, it's clear that not all of the service's 6,500 active members are doing the same thing."

    If two people (the article mentions one other having spent $1000) account for 20% of the $10K that this company has made in a month, this seems more like silliness on the part of a very few people, and shouldn't really be considered "newsworthy".

    1. Re:Much ado about nothing... by DR+SoB · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it's a great way to make your stock go up and get out early!!

      1. Invent dumb idea
      2. Have rich investor modify the stock price
      3. Profit!
      4. RUN!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  10. People will pay a lot for esteem and attention by Trespass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may sound silly, but little things like this are seen as validating by a lot of people who spend a significant amount of time online. You don't really 'have' anything, but you know that someone, somewhere spent money on you.

  11. Popularity by gid13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article mentions that the most popular members are invariably attractive females whose pictures show them scantily clad and in sexy poses.

    Seeing as this "buying nothing" idea is a capitalist's dream, I think it's only a matter of time before these attractive females rise up above their alleged vapidity to realize that they can control the world. As much as I hate to admit it, think about it: who would you vote for between George W. and Britney Spears?

    1. Re:Popularity by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure that they're all very attractive. Just like in real life.

      Deception. The Internet's full of it.

  12. Excellent! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's good to know that there are plenty of suckers left in the world, I was getting worried that my combo hair brush, vegetable peeler and ice skate sharpener wasn't going to sell!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  13. a digital diamond ring for my gf by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    gf: LIKEOMGWTF!!!!11

    me: but it's the thought that counts, right?

  14. no different from diamonds by hak1du · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real value of diamonds is a small fraction of what they cost in the market. The reason they are expensive is because a smart cartell has established them as expensive, if valueless, tokens of affection. And there is ample precedent in biology: males are supposed to demonstrate their wealth and prowess by not having to care about expending costly resources on useless pursuits.

    However, if you are going to do this, why not dispose of your resources in some socially valuable way? Demonstrate your boundless resources by making a "platinum circle" donation to your local opera house, either in your own name or in your sweetheart's name.

  15. The FunHI Corporation is a division... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...of P.T. Barnum global holdings.

  16. Re:It's kind of like having a real life tamagotchi by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 5, Funny

    I have one of those. It's called a dog.

    --
    Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
  17. Not to worry by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just bought them some pictures of food.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  18. Re:Way too much. by BasharTeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not like there aren't a thousand other "accepted" hobbies in the world that eat up far more time and money. Let people spend their life / time / money as they see fit. If you don't like it, just don't play. If you're just knocking on other people because you can't seem to find a hobby that interests you as much, I pity you.

  19. Pimp by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:

    Of course, being a young good-looking female doesn't hurt, as the members with the most fans are all women whose pictures show them in sexy, alluring poses.

    &

    The service aims, according to what might be called its bylaws, to foster purely positive and friendly interactions.

    Sheesh. Why not just call it "FunHo" and be done with it?

  20. US$30 != FunHi$30, and why its brilliant by salmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    See real money gets changed for fake money. I think it's like US$10=FUnHi$30. Plus some of the gifts give the recipient even more fake money. All in all, most "gifts" cost just a few cents.

    The thing is that they're tapping an already existing culture- racing and souping up import cars. It serves as a fan-club kind of thing for these import models, and then expands from there.

    I really have to hand it to the guys who started it. They tapped a culture well, provided a means for them to play on the internet together and found a way to make a tidy profit off of it. Besides, you don't even need to pay to use it. You don't have to buy "gifts" for people. It's just a nice way to say "I like you" or whatever that backed up by a little bit more.

    I'll admit, I accidently ran into this early on in its development and started playing along for mostly 2 reasons: 1) I was newly single so having cute asian girls give me compliments boosted my ego 2) I'm horrible with internet culture (IMing and other sorts of things where you speak with abbreviations and smileys) so I thought it would be funny to see how well I do (and how well "they" do) with my paragraphs and thinking.

    It was fun for a while, but now it's getting really dull. Next!

  21. Re:Snobby Greedy Bitch... by websaber · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It's getting to the point were some people have so much that there's nothing you can buy them, so now you can give the thought with out burdening them with the need to actually deal with the item.

    --
    "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
  22. Re:Snobby Greedy Bitch... by UberQwerty · · Score: 4, Informative

    RTFA: It's $30 for a faux CREDIT CARD. In real life, they're free. (Also, when you buy it for someone, they get $28.00 in credit to spend on more worthless imaginary stuff. What a deal!)

    By comparison, the second most expensive item is a faux private jet, valued at $14.99

    --


    PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  23. Re:Golden Rule? Shieat? by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 4, Funny

    This place is a horrific written image of pain.

    I quote:

    FunHi is your friendly gangsta, playa pimp, banging hunie community. Haters and lamers shall be dealt with to the FULL extent of da law

    My eyes, they bleed!

    My brain, it bleeds!

  24. What are you doing by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    on the internet? That money you're wasting on yourself could be better spent feeding the hungry. I bet you have the nerve to drive a car, too.

    Starvation isn't a money problem. It doesn't take money to plant a garden and grow food. The problem is the assholes in charge who prevent the food from going to people who need it that need to be overthrown.

    There's plenty of food. And buying more of it isn't going to make the situation better for anyone but the assholes in charge who hoard it for themselves.

    The poor will always be with you. If you feel so compelled, help the poor in far away places. I'd rather help those around me. And that involves buying crap that helps pay their wages so that they don't starve.

    I don't suppose you stopped to think that if nobody bought anything they didn't need, 90%+ of the population would be out of work and unable to afford to eat. Our society functions based on the buying and selling of crap. Just like every other country.

    If you go to the Mexican border at least, everybody is selling something. Buying a pot or a flower you don't need really equates to feeding the seller and his family.

    Buying a stupid little icon helps keep this guy fed and with the extra money he buys more crap which puts money in a lot of people's pockets so they can eat and so on down the line.

    To claim that we shouldn't buy anything frivilous is incredibly short sighted. I don't think you realize how many poor people survive selling frivilous crap working at fast food joints, restaurants and what not. You think corporations should just give people money? Where do you think their money comes from?

    Ben

  25. Horrible by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FunHi seems to be an extreme manifestation of the overly materialistic culture it has emanated from (people who call themselves a "gangsta" or a "playa" or a "hunie", modern popular culture basically), it's just... too horrible for words.

    People judging how popular and loved they are on the basis of how much other people have spent on them *puke*.

    I guess they could all be doing it in an ironic and political fashion to show all members of capitalist societies to be whores. I'm sorta doubting that's the case, personally.