Slashdot Mirror


Spread The Love (And Pay Us)

Digitus1337 writes "Wired has an article up about a new online service known as 'FunHi.' You sign up and join a community, and give your fellows gifts, but as Wired has reported, 'these are not ordinary gifts. They're purely digital: little flashing icons of cars, planes, diamond rings and other virtual representations of expensive items included in messages members send each other. And FunHi members don't seem to care that the real money they're spending on the gifts, at prices as high as $30 an item, is going straight into the company's coffers." This leaves just one question unanswered... why didn't I think of this?" It sounds like an April Fool's Joke, but then, so does online trading of Everquest loot.

101 of 442 comments (clear)

  1. wow... by AssProphet · · Score: 5, Insightful


    FunHI - yet another reason capitalism should come with a warning

  2. Snobby Greedy Bitch... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    What about the Snobby Greedy Bitch... the one who thinks these gifts are reprsentative of real ones?

    Then $30 will seem quite inexpensive.

    1. Re:Snobby Greedy Bitch... by websaber · · Score: 5, Insightful

      It's getting to the point were some people have so much that there's nothing you can buy them, so now you can give the thought with out burdening them with the need to actually deal with the item.

      --
      "A good friend will bail you out of jail. A true friend will be sitting next to you saying, 'damn....that was fun!'"
    2. Re:Snobby Greedy Bitch... by UberQwerty · · Score: 4, Informative

      RTFA: It's $30 for a faux CREDIT CARD. In real life, they're free. (Also, when you buy it for someone, they get $28.00 in credit to spend on more worthless imaginary stuff. What a deal!)

      By comparison, the second most expensive item is a faux private jet, valued at $14.99

      --


      PUBLIC SPLIT ON WHETHER BUSH IS A DIVIDER -CNN scrolling banner, 10/15/2004
  3. Status symbols by gbjbaanb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suppose a real diamond ring is a status symbol, as is using a $10 bill to light your cigar.

    So too is throwing your money away with a virtual gift. let them who want to, do it.

    1. Re:Status symbols by jkabbe · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I suppose a real diamond ring is a status symbol

      Agreed. Buying a diamond is saying "here DeBeers, have some money" just so other people can see that you gave DeBeers lots of money. It's simply a more socially accepted method of throwing your money away.

    2. Re:Status symbols by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      This may surprise you but some people actually think diamonds are nice to look at and that's why they buy them. It has nothing to do with status symbols. Then again, you've probably never even spoken to a girl so you have no idea.

    3. Re:Status symbols by JabberWokky · · Score: 2, Funny
      We're looking at getting a graphite, coal, diamond, buckyball engagement ring. And she swears up and down that she hates o-chem and is a physical chemist.

      Polished hard coal and diamonds look nice together, btw.

      --
      Evan

      --
      "$30 for the One True Ring. $10 each additional ring!" -- JRR "Bob" Tolkien
    4. Re:Status symbols by Ryan+Amos · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the perfect woman would accept a pearl necklace. On a nightly basis.

    5. Re:Status symbols by evilad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Lots of people find other, cheaper things prettier, but still insist on diamonds as a token of fidelity.

      The Royal Ontario Museum had a display on gemstones for a while, with a placard over the diamond display anwering the FAQ: "Why are diamonds so valuable?" with a simple "Scarcity and excellent marketing."

    6. Re:Status symbols by Tim+Browse · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, sure. Diamonds are real scarce.

    7. Re:Status symbols by neurojab · · Score: 4, Insightful

      >This may surprise you but some people actually think diamonds are nice to look at and that's why they buy them. It has nothing to do with status symbols.

      Yeah right. Diamonds look nice, but so do countless other less expensive gemstones. Diamonds do have status associated with them, and that status and "tradition" is due to being propped up by DeBeers. If people just wanted to buy something that looked nice, why do wedding rings always have to have diamonds in them? Surely a few people must think a ring looks just fine without having to be diamond-encrusted, or perhaps prefer emeralds, opals, or rubies.

      The previous poster is quite right about the diamond cartel, your positive feelings about diamonds are in no small part due to their propoganda.

      >Then again, you've probably never even spoken to a girl so you have no idea.

      It's possible the previous poster has never spoken to a girl. It's also possible he talks to intelligent women instead of wasting his time on materialistic girls.

    8. Re:Status symbols by hanssprudel · · Score: 4, Insightful

      a) Cubic zirconium looks just as good. Many other gems that cost less actually look better.

      b) Even if you have specially trained eyes that can actually tell the difference, and you have some strange need for the diamonds, then modern industrially produced diamonds are actually more pure then mined ones. You need a microscope to tell the difference, and when you do, you rule out the man made one because it is too perfect. Yet the gemstones that DeBeer's has managed to manipulate you into buying are all mined - simply because they are about status rather than beauty.

    9. Re:Status symbols by the_consumer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually, a nerd is more likely to test a purported diamond's hardness against softer materials in order to prove its authenticity.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    10. Re:Status symbols by el_gordo101 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a) Cubic zirconium looks just as good. Many other gems that cost less actually look better.

      Try to explain that to a real-world, emotion-having, concerned-about-what-her-friends-think woman and see how far you get. "But honey, the Cubic zirconium is just as good as a diamond, plus we aren't supporting DeBeers! Hey wait, where are you going? Honey? Baby?"

      --
      TODO: Insert witty sig
    11. Re:Status symbols by Lumpy · · Score: 2, Interesting

      There is a factory north of here that makes synthetic gems that are guarenteed to fool even experts.

      Shelby diamonds, in shelby michigan. they have to laser etch their logo into the edge of every gem to make identification easier for most experts.

      They prefected a process that adds natural like imperfections into their gems, but they are chemically identical to the natural thing.

      this is why I laugh at everyone that buy's gem's for their finger or neck. It makes me want to sell them a DVD rewinder.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    12. Re:Status symbols by be-fan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And we're back to the point about how diamonds are just status symbols.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    13. Re:Status symbols by BlackFoliage · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Or you could find a real-world, emotion-having, NOT-concerned-about-what-idiots-think women who shares your values. Do you really want to spend your life with someone who throws ethics out the window for a sparkly piece of junk?

    14. Re:Status symbols by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Funny

      Thank God my real-world, emotion-having girlfriend is more concerned about feeding the hungry and stopping de-facro slavery and international economic imperalism than about impressing her friends with carbon rocks.

      And she's not only ethical, she's hot!

      --
      STOP . AMERICA . NOW
    15. Re:Status symbols by GPLDAN · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but she doesn't shave her armpits and wears the birkenstocks for two weeks straight. And eventually all that Ben & Jerry's ice cream will catch up with her.

    16. Re:Status symbols by System.out.println() · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It more than "looks fine", cubic zirconium is indistinguishable from an actual diamond except with special equipment. But buying a cubic zirconium ring is often seen in society as, "My fiance(e) isn't worth a real diamond, here's a fake one." ....even if no one can tell. ....it makes no sense whatsoever.

    17. Re:Status symbols by __aanebg9627 · · Score: 3, Insightful


      Really, most of what we in the developed world spend money on is status symbols. The value in a Mercedes or a Rolex isn't in the actual car, it's in the status they provide. Why do people buy new cars? Status. Lights inside your case, to wow your friends at the LAN party? Status. A neatly mowed front lawn? Status. (Seriously! Read Thorstein Veblen's seminal _Theory of the Leisure Class_.) Martha Stewart housewares? Status.

      The key to value and status is scarcity. Period. If something is useful, beautiful or cool, and scarce because it's programmed into the MMPORG, it's valuable. That scarcity value is no different than the scarcity value that comes from being stamped by a trademark (Rolex, Mercedes), artificial scarcity from a cartel (diamonds), or actual scarcity (land in Tokyo).

      Outside of monopolies and cartels, what makes something scarce (and therefore valuable) is the time it takes to make or get. Stuff is valuable in MMPORGs because it takes time to get. This is no different than what makes some physical object valuable.

      If you think about it, a deed or patent is just as virtual as that leet EQ weapon. There is no physical reality there, just ideas in peoples' heads (and laws to back them up, which are also virtual). The value is only in the usefulness and scarcity.

      Which raises the question; How long until governments start trying to tax the online economies in MMPORGs?

    18. Re:Status symbols by ryanwright · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Speaking of real-world, where are you living? All women will do that. Don't believe me?

      No, I don't. My wife doesn't care about diamonds or other gems. We have gold wedding bands with no decorations. Cost less than $100 for the pair. If I had wasted money on diamonds, she probably wouldn't have married me.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
    19. Re:Status symbols by phaggood · · Score: 2, Funny

      Seriously, there are women out there that hate diamonds (yes, I know some)

      Man, *that's* what I should have put on my match.com ad:

      Dude seeks chick for perm relationship; must be a techie, at least have some opinion about one of the 'Treks'. If it leads to something serious, prefer woman who believes a memory (i.e. a month in Nepal) is forever, and a diamond is just a rock.

    20. Re:Status symbols by rossifer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      some people actually think diamonds are nice to look at and that's why they buy them.

      Sure, but they should buy them at the market price, not at the DeBeers artificial price. Just try to sell a diamond to a store for a fraction of the price they've got on a similar diamond. The moment you leave a retail store with a shiny new diamond, it loses 50-80% of it's value as a saleable good.

      People who like diamonds should buy diamonds at estate sales and keep the DeBeers markup in their pocket. There are smaller jewelers who will help with this process, grading a diamond pre-sale (when possible), buying it for you, resetting it in your own jewelry, and selling you a very nice diamond ring for a small fraction of the price of the same ring from a retail store.

      There's going to be a small diamond in my soon-to-be fiancee's ring (along with a similar sized garnet: our birthstones), but most of the money that DeBeers would prefer I spent on a diamond ring is going to be spent on her double laser eye surgery instead.

      Then again, you've probably never even spoken to a girl so you have no idea.

      This is what's commonly known as an ad-hominem argument. It doesn't make your argument any more compelling, and often makes you look rather spiteful and mean-spirited. I'd recommend that you avoid similar statements in future discussions.

      Regards,
      Ross

    21. Re:Status symbols by WNight · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Does that mean the cz doesn't look like a diamond, or that she's a gold-digging whore who wants to know she can yank you around by your dick to the tune of $10k for a stupid rock?

      Sorry, but it's the truth. If the ring will never be subjected to a test that would prove the stone isn't a cz then it should be irrelevant if it is. If she's demanding real diamond it's merely for a status symbol.

      Perhaps I'm unreasonably rational and ignoring the emotional aspects, but I feel that if someone throws away a house down-payment (3-6 months after-tax wages, the "recommended" ammount, is probably 5-10% of the purchase value of a house in your price-range) just for bragging rights, they're an idiot.

  4. Personally... by pubjames · · Score: 5, Funny


    I'd love you more if you just gave me the money...

    1. Re:Personally... by pubjames · · Score: 2, Funny

      Troll? I was being serious. And joking.

  5. On the plus side... by Channard · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... maybe the people who are prepared to pay out cash for virtual items will be so busy trading their nonexistent gifts they won't have time to breed, and the average IQ will go up. At the very least, it should keep the terminally gullible out of circulation.

    1. Re:On the plus side... by theCulture · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let's take a more direct approach: Let people subscribe to this for six months, then have a cull of all community members, preferably with something large and blunt.

      Result: The base level of stupidity is removed from the gene pool. Rejoice!

      --
      theCulture - "A strange combination of English middle class home counties and californian surf-bum"
    2. Re:On the plus side... by bluelantern · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Probably not. Barnum's Corollary: If a sucker is born every minute now, a sucker will be born at least every minute in the future.

      Not to mention having a high IQ is far less correlated with being a sucker than being born in the suburbs.

    3. Re:On the plus side... by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 4, Funny
      And perhaps this will drain their coffers so they can't spend this money on spam. God, just wait till the spammers catch onto this......

      "Buy an animated gif of a penis up to 3" longer than yours! Guaranteed! $50"

      --
      Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  6. Like.... by bitchell · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Like purchasing a square on the moon. Whats the point.

    A fool and their money are soon parted.

    1. Re:Like.... by strictnein · · Score: 4, Insightful

      It probably won't, but it could - especially if you buy it for a child and they keep it into adulthood.

      Except for the people who are "selling" land on the moon, have no legal right to do so, and therefore you are just giving money to them as an example of your own stupidity.

    2. Re:Like.... by esswedl · · Score: 2, Funny

      However, there is just one problem:
      Imminent domain.


      Eminent. As in: given the large volume of comments on Slashdot, a misspelling of "eminent domain" is imminent.

  7. Amazing by mr.henry · · Score: 4, Funny
    This reminds me of a line from Larouche in Adaptation:

    I'm training myself on the internet. It's fascinating. I'm doing pornography. It's amazing how much these suckers will pay for photographs of chicks. And it doesn't matter if they're fat or ugly or what.

    Paying for crappy porn.. that's bad. But paying 30 bucks for a stupid icon? These people are dumber than that guy that loves his spam.

  8. It's kind of like having a real life tamagotchi by bl4nk · · Score: 3, Funny

    That you spend real life money on..

    1. Re:It's kind of like having a real life tamagotchi by Chess_the_cat · · Score: 5, Funny

      I have one of those. It's called a dog.

      --
      Support the First Amendment. Read at -1
    2. Re:It's kind of like having a real life tamagotchi by drinkypoo · · Score: 2, Funny

      Given that people are trying to get laid it's more like a tamacoochie.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  9. More proof that... by Omestes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A fool and their money soon part. Capitalism seems to make this easier, and the internet makes it EVEN easier. I say good for this company, if an idiot wants to spend $30 on a picture of a ring, let him, it is no less idiotic than spending a couple grand on a real one.

    --
    A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government. -edward abbey
    1. Re:More proof that... by Blue+Stone · · Score: 4, Funny
      I find myself wondering what will happen if the recipient of the icon of the diamond ring starts copying and distributing those icons.

      Suddenly, fake diamond-ring-icons will threaten the natural diamond-ring-icon cartel, and FunHi will have to spend millions researching and building devices for distinguishing between the natural and fake icons; millions more advertising that only "Natural Diamond-Ring-Icons" show real love.

      You see ... you cynics ... ripping off the gullible is not just the fast-track to the gravy train. Getting a sustainable revenue channel by scamming the soft-of-the-brain is harder than it looks.

      --
      Corporation, n. An ingenious device for obtaining individual profit without individual responsibility. - Ambrose Bierce
  10. Charm Bracelets? by themightythor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These sound like the charm bracelets that my little sister drooled over in the 80's. Except even more pointless.

  11. Looks like they ripped their rating system... by MadAnthony02 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their buzz system (scroll down) is a direct ripoff of eBay's feedback system. Wonder how long they get sued for that?

    1. Re:Looks like they ripped their rating system... by DAldredge · · Score: 2, Funny

      About the time that kindergarden teachers band together and sue ebay for using stars as a feedback method.

      Ebay didn't think of it first.

  12. Much ado about nothing... by bc90021 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the article:

    "Selman says FunHi has banked about $10,000 in the month since FunHi launched. And given that Georgiades himself has paid about 10 percent of that, it's clear that not all of the service's 6,500 active members are doing the same thing."

    If two people (the article mentions one other having spent $1000) account for 20% of the $10K that this company has made in a month, this seems more like silliness on the part of a very few people, and shouldn't really be considered "newsworthy".

    1. Re:Much ado about nothing... by DR+SoB · · Score: 5, Funny

      But it's a great way to make your stock go up and get out early!!

      1. Invent dumb idea
      2. Have rich investor modify the stock price
      3. Profit!
      4. RUN!

      --
      Mod +5 Drunk
  13. People will pay a lot for esteem and attention by Trespass · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It may sound silly, but little things like this are seen as validating by a lot of people who spend a significant amount of time online. You don't really 'have' anything, but you know that someone, somewhere spent money on you.

  14. Popularity by gid13 · · Score: 5, Funny

    The article mentions that the most popular members are invariably attractive females whose pictures show them scantily clad and in sexy poses.

    Seeing as this "buying nothing" idea is a capitalist's dream, I think it's only a matter of time before these attractive females rise up above their alleged vapidity to realize that they can control the world. As much as I hate to admit it, think about it: who would you vote for between George W. and Britney Spears?

    1. Re:Popularity by lukewarmfusion · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, I'm sure that they're all very attractive. Just like in real life.

      Deception. The Internet's full of it.

    2. Re:Popularity by sct · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is there any way I can just shoot myself instead? Maybe I would just kill myself with a fork.

      Couldn't you at least pick a non-slutty "woman" over Ms. Spears? Or maybe a modern era politician over a Puritan wannabe?

    3. Re:Popularity by dasmegabyte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Man, in a way, we're always buying nothing. Buy a $15 poster, that's just $.10 worth of paper covered in $.50 worth of ink. Buy a $6salad, you have $.75 worth of vegetable parts in a $.20 plastic case. Shit, even a $200 computer chip is just a few ounces of sand with a negligible amount of metal.

      But that doesn't mean these things don't have value. If you think that poster will look good on the wall, you'll pay for it. If you're hungry, you'll buy the salad. And if you need to process something, you'll buy the chip.

      This value is in people's perception of the extra effort spent by people in processing these raw materials. Now, those raw materials are basically worthless in the digital world, but if you can process them into a form that people value, then they're worth it.

      That doesn't mean this idea isn't stupid, of course. If I want my friends to know I care about them, I'll send them some bitchin' MP3s.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
  15. Excellent! by Mysticalfruit · · Score: 4, Funny

    It's good to know that there are plenty of suckers left in the world, I was getting worried that my combo hair brush, vegetable peeler and ice skate sharpener wasn't going to sell!

    --
    Yes Francis, the world has gone crazy.
  16. Brilliant! Slashdot could make money this way... by jrduncans · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How I wish that I were unscrupulous enough to come up with such an idea. This system would be equivalent to: if Slashdot moderation were geared towards highly rating those posts that advertised for their sponsors...

  17. Hmmm by cca93014 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Just as well there aren't 2 billion starving people in the...

    Oh, wait.

  18. Test for them? by grub · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Their domain expires 09-apr-2007. I guess the short term domain "lease" suggests this was an experiment for them, which seems to have paid off. Now I'm wondering what else they've done or had planned.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  19. a digital diamond ring for my gf by WormholeFiend · · Score: 4, Funny

    gf: LIKEOMGWTF!!!!11

    me: but it's the thought that counts, right?

  20. no different from diamonds by hak1du · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The real value of diamonds is a small fraction of what they cost in the market. The reason they are expensive is because a smart cartell has established them as expensive, if valueless, tokens of affection. And there is ample precedent in biology: males are supposed to demonstrate their wealth and prowess by not having to care about expending costly resources on useless pursuits.

    However, if you are going to do this, why not dispose of your resources in some socially valuable way? Demonstrate your boundless resources by making a "platinum circle" donation to your local opera house, either in your own name or in your sweetheart's name.

    1. Re:no different from diamonds by GoofyBoy · · Score: 3, Funny

      >males are supposed to demonstrate their wealth and prowess by not having to care about expending costly resources on useless pursuits.

      So are you saying that all the slashdot trolls are demonstrating their mating suitability?

      --
      The surprise isn't how often we make bad choices; the surprise is how seldom they defeat us.
    2. Re:no different from diamonds by XaXXon · · Score: 2, Informative

      Just like the parent said, except not to an opera house.

      Donate here or here

      Or buy them some music from here where the artist gets 50% of the proceeds. BTW, don't be fooled into thinking that iTunes or whatever gives money to artists. It's just as bad as buying a CD. Unfortunately, there's no way to buy music you hear on popular music stations and actually have a reasonable portion of that music get to the artist </rant>

    3. Re:no different from diamonds by general_re · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The real value of diamonds is a small fraction of what they cost in the market.

      The "real value" of any good or service is whatever you can get in exchange for it - any notion of intrinsic worth is a specious concept, as is any valuation other than exchange value. If people didn't value diamonds as highly as DeBeers does, they simply wouldn't buy them.

      --
      ABSURDITY, n.: A statement or belief manifestly inconsistent with one's own opinion.
    4. Re:no different from diamonds by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Demonstrate your boundless resources by making a "platinum circle" donation to your local opera house


      So, what's the "real value" of an opera house? In what way is the intrinsic value of listening to music greater than the intrinsic value of looking at a sparkling stone?


      Although so many people deride money, it's in the end one of the greatest and most important inventions ever made. Money is what allows one to make comparisons between the value of wildly different things, as judged by society as a whole, and make choices accordingly. You may not agree with the choices other people make, but that's how democracy and the market work. If you attribute more value to an opera house than to a diamond, that's your choice. Give money to the opera house instead of buying a diamond. But it seems that, cartel or not, a lot of people think diamonds have a higher value than opera houses.

    5. Re:no different from diamonds by Animats · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Yeah, right. Try to sell a diamond. See what offers you get.

      For a good laugh, search eBay for "diamonds". Or worse, Google, for "we buy diamonds". You'll see some of the slimiest ads around. "Diamond buyers" with Hotmail addresses. Cubic zircons advertised as diamonds. The same photo appearing in multiple eBay ads for different items.

  21. The FunHI Corporation is a division... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...of P.T. Barnum global holdings.

  22. meh by monkease · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups"

    but really, this does go to show something about how we attach value to even worthless things. way back when in britain there was a fad involving flower bulbs; way back when in america there was a fad involving beanie babies. when you really think about it, does the negligible manufacturing cost of a beanie baby really make it signifigantly more valuable than a magnetic charge on a hard drive?

  23. Not to worry by SuperKendall · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just bought them some pictures of food.

    --
    "There is more worth loving than we have strength to love." - Brian Jay Stanley
  24. Oh, hush. by cduffy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not like the money that's spent on this is taken out of circulation, no? It's just moved somewhere else -- a company that pays its employees and (presumably) its shareholders [via dividends], who it turn spend it on... well, whatever they spend it on, which may or may not include feeding starving people.

    Indeed, if the people who spend money on this are the kind of people who aren't inclined to give money to feed the starving, then it's to the benefit of those who are starving that the money is now out of their hands and in someone else's.

    1. Re:Oh, hush. by Loconut1389 · · Score: 2

      They probably rent out one or two racks in a colo center somewhere with a megabit or two pipe and probably have 1 or 2 staff... Maybe thats unrealistic, but its certainly possible. I doubt their overhead is very high.

  25. Re:Way too much. by BasharTeg · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It's not like there aren't a thousand other "accepted" hobbies in the world that eat up far more time and money. Let people spend their life / time / money as they see fit. If you don't like it, just don't play. If you're just knocking on other people because you can't seem to find a hobby that interests you as much, I pity you.

  26. Pimp by Mateito · · Score: 5, Funny
    From the article:

    Of course, being a young good-looking female doesn't hurt, as the members with the most fans are all women whose pictures show them in sexy, alluring poses.

    &

    The service aims, according to what might be called its bylaws, to foster purely positive and friendly interactions.

    Sheesh. Why not just call it "FunHo" and be done with it?

  27. US$30 != FunHi$30, and why its brilliant by salmo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    See real money gets changed for fake money. I think it's like US$10=FUnHi$30. Plus some of the gifts give the recipient even more fake money. All in all, most "gifts" cost just a few cents.

    The thing is that they're tapping an already existing culture- racing and souping up import cars. It serves as a fan-club kind of thing for these import models, and then expands from there.

    I really have to hand it to the guys who started it. They tapped a culture well, provided a means for them to play on the internet together and found a way to make a tidy profit off of it. Besides, you don't even need to pay to use it. You don't have to buy "gifts" for people. It's just a nice way to say "I like you" or whatever that backed up by a little bit more.

    I'll admit, I accidently ran into this early on in its development and started playing along for mostly 2 reasons: 1) I was newly single so having cute asian girls give me compliments boosted my ego 2) I'm horrible with internet culture (IMing and other sorts of things where you speak with abbreviations and smileys) so I thought it would be funny to see how well I do (and how well "they" do) with my paragraphs and thinking.

    It was fun for a while, but now it's getting really dull. Next!

  28. Goes to show how braindead consumers are. by DroopyStonx · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Here, let me draw a picture of a diamond ring... store it in this database here. Now, I'll have you and a few others sign up as members to this database.

    You pay me $$, I will do a simple "INSERT INTO" statement and associate the diamond ring record with the recipient's user ID. You will feel good because you sent them a "gift", they will feel happy because they think they will have received a real gift.

    You will think it's fun, I will think it's funny. I will be rich, you will be paying me to alter my data in my database.

    At least this gives hope to people trying to make money out there.

    I have an idea. I have a website filled with members and their email addresses. When you want to send a gift, YOU draw the gift using MS Paint. Upload the picture, I will email it to the recipient of your choice, and I will only charge $1.99. See, because YOU drew it and it would be from YOU! (The sad thing is, people would probably go for it)

    --
    We have secretly replaced these Slashdot mods' sense of humor with a rusty nail. Let's see if they notice!!
  29. Golden Rule? Shieat? by HomeGroove · · Score: 3, Funny
    From the site:
    The FunHi Goldunn Rule: If ya can't say sumtin' nice, then don't say shieat!
    I find it hard to call something a "company" when they have the non-word "shieat" and "sumtin'" on their site.
    --

    ----
    Spam subject of the moment: Offshore account secrets -nashville disrupt

  30. teen entertainment by Blue+Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I live in Norway, and here teenagers have for many years spent big money on ringtones, logos, screensavers etc for their mobile phones. Now, with the new phones, people have started paying for mms messages, games etc as well.

    Also, there are tons of tv programs where you can pay for having your sms shown on the screen for a brief moment. Sort of like using IRC, but spending $1-2 each time you press enter.

    My point, I guess, is that the way young people spend their money doesn't really amaze me anymore...

  31. Southpark Raisins by t_allardyce · · Score: 2, Informative

    Anyone seen that southpark episode "raisins"? this reminds me of it so much!

    "MissEvelyn: I need some virtual loot. If you want to show me you care, send me some. Your profile will show everyone you're a "Playa." I'll receive the icons and know i'm special. I'm counting on you to help me get noticed in style. Holla!"

    wonder what percentage they get?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
  32. A double standard? by abh · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's post after post on here of people saying "this is stupid", "I can't believe these people pay for stupid icons", and "why would anyone buy virtual anything".

    Yet there's quite a bit of the /. crowd that thinks it is perfectly normal and acceptable to sell items or characters for an EverQuest game. Hello... Pot, you have a call on line one. It's Kettle.

    1. Re:A double standard? by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      "Yet there's quite a bit of the /. crowd that thinks it is perfectly normal and acceptable to sell items or characters for an EverQuest game."

      However, a number of Slashdot posters are critical of EverQuest items, as well. Furthermore, the EverQuest items at least have a use, even if that use is constrained to virtual progress in a virtual world. In contrast, the FunHi items are purely ornamental -- you can't even use them within the virtual world.

      On the other hand, there's one thing that I think does justify the FunHi system -- the trick is to look at the real money being paid as donations to keep the site going. The status symbol rewards are just fun little virtual recognitions of those donations. This isn't like EverQuest where everyone is already paying monthly to keep the servers up and running.

    2. Re:A double standard? by John+Hasler · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Some Slashdot posters think FunHi gifts are dumb. Other Slashdot posters sell Everquest stuff. Hint: they are _different_ _people_.

      --
      Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  33. Free love? by Bitmanhome · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Luv don't cost a thang: $.01
    Nuff sed.
    --
    Not that this wasn't entirely predictable.
  34. the only thing that really makes me angry... by sevenmonkey · · Score: 2, Funny

    The only thing about this kind of business that really makes me angry is that I didn't think of it first...

  35. Outdoing each other in generosity? by Badgerman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    People like to compete. We like a challenge. We also like to reciprocate. We're social animals.

    FunHi, using symbols, tapped into that part of us, probably to their own surprise. It's symbols, though silly, have value - in dollars. So you can "measure" how much someone spent on you (or someone else) and ignore, thank, reciprocate, or compete appropriately.

    Do I think it'll last? No. But it's worth studying.

    Just my 2 cents. Or, in the future, 1/50 of a Slashdollar!

    (And yes, I expect FunHi's idea to be imitated to death).

    --
    "The Sage treasures Unity and measures all things by it" - Lao Tzu
  36. Wealth is wealth by mangu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When doesn't wealth trickle down to the poor? Answer: when resources are being consumed. For instance, if gasoline is being burned in SUV's when it's needed for tractors, that could be an example of wealth not trickling down. However, I believe the problem of hunger isn't caused by insufficient food,but by bad distribution. Therefore, getting money out of the hands of those who have it will, eventually, put it in the hands of the needy. Spend it on a Porsche, the Porsche factory will pay some workers, who will pay their housemaids: that's "trickle down" for you.

  37. Re:Before you go off on FunHi people being stupid. by statusbar · · Score: 3, Insightful
    This is all good.

    My new realization is: A fool and his money are best parted. The last thing you want are bunches of fools with effective personal or political power.

    --jeff++

    --
    ipv6 is my vpn
  38. Maybe Changing Though by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Artificial high price of diamonds may be changing. Here is an article about quality mass produced diamonds, that I read some time back.

  39. They've got a great thing going on here. by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Interesting

    You have to note that the prices don't really match up - The $30 super biznatch iced out platinum plastik translates to $20 real money. Still, it's hilarious.

    It seems to me they're a bunch of slashdot-style geeks blatantly milking a huge group of retards - the hint is the "Dominatrix Sub Whip +2" - I don't expect the idiots who actually use that site to have any idea what a +2 is.

    I also doubt that anyone who really wrote the way they do would be able to set up a complicated website.

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  40. Re:Golden Rule? Shieat? by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 4, Funny

    This place is a horrific written image of pain.

    I quote:

    FunHi is your friendly gangsta, playa pimp, banging hunie community. Haters and lamers shall be dealt with to the FULL extent of da law

    My eyes, they bleed!

    My brain, it bleeds!

  41. What are you doing by KalvinB · · Score: 4, Insightful

    on the internet? That money you're wasting on yourself could be better spent feeding the hungry. I bet you have the nerve to drive a car, too.

    Starvation isn't a money problem. It doesn't take money to plant a garden and grow food. The problem is the assholes in charge who prevent the food from going to people who need it that need to be overthrown.

    There's plenty of food. And buying more of it isn't going to make the situation better for anyone but the assholes in charge who hoard it for themselves.

    The poor will always be with you. If you feel so compelled, help the poor in far away places. I'd rather help those around me. And that involves buying crap that helps pay their wages so that they don't starve.

    I don't suppose you stopped to think that if nobody bought anything they didn't need, 90%+ of the population would be out of work and unable to afford to eat. Our society functions based on the buying and selling of crap. Just like every other country.

    If you go to the Mexican border at least, everybody is selling something. Buying a pot or a flower you don't need really equates to feeding the seller and his family.

    Buying a stupid little icon helps keep this guy fed and with the extra money he buys more crap which puts money in a lot of people's pockets so they can eat and so on down the line.

    To claim that we shouldn't buy anything frivilous is incredibly short sighted. I don't think you realize how many poor people survive selling frivilous crap working at fast food joints, restaurants and what not. You think corporations should just give people money? Where do you think their money comes from?

    Ben

  42. Re:Why would I pay for this? by dasmegabyte · · Score: 3, Funny

    YOU wouldn't pay for this.

    But somebody who didn't understand technology and didn't want to MIGHT pay for it because they thought it was a cute idea. These are the same people who buy new Sims add-ons for the additional wallpaper and landscaping. These are the people keeing Pier 1, Tuesday Morning and the Christmas Tree Shop in business. These are the same people who keep buying me candles, picture frames and other tchotchkes when what I really need is a new fucking laptop.

    In short, women will pay for this, because it is useless but kind of cute and not too expensive.

    --
    Hey freaks: now you're ju
  43. Overseas by velocidisc · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Virtual accesories and avatars are a big business in Korea

    --
    Uva Uvam Vivendo Varia Fit
  44. Horrible by megan_of_wutai · · Score: 4, Insightful

    FunHi seems to be an extreme manifestation of the overly materialistic culture it has emanated from (people who call themselves a "gangsta" or a "playa" or a "hunie", modern popular culture basically), it's just... too horrible for words.

    People judging how popular and loved they are on the basis of how much other people have spent on them *puke*.

    I guess they could all be doing it in an ironic and political fashion to show all members of capitalist societies to be whores. I'm sorta doubting that's the case, personally.

  45. Not, brittany, by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 3, Insightful

    She's too obvious. Now a contest between liv tyler and George bush.... Thats got more of a dilema.

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  46. Re:Why would I pay for this? by wideBlueSkies · · Score: 2, Interesting

    God I hate all that stuff.

    It dosen't even register when you ask them to give money instead of some useless trinkets.

    I'm trying to save up for the down payment on a motorcycle that I want very badly. I'm trying to do this without affecting my family budget. So I'm saving a portion of my weekly lunch money, carpooling to work some days, doing without excess CD's, etc. And over the last year I've saved quite a bit of money.

    Before Christman I thought it'd be nice if I could transform gifts into savings. So when people called my wife to ask what I wanted, she told them that I would prefer money because I'm saving for something.

    Besides my wife herself, not 1 person went 'out of their way' to give me cash. I don't get it. They think they're doing me a favor by buying me alluminum coffee mugs and gift certificates to clothing stores I don't even like.

    My Mother actually told me that there's no thought in giving money. So she gives me a gift certificate to Target instead. Go figure.

    wbs.

    --
    Huh?
  47. You're not a unique special flake... by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    I just bought a case of paste-on foil gold stars at Office Depot. Now I'm going to completely destroy the intellectual economy of the local kindergarten. BWAHAHAHAHA!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  48. It's all about re-sellability by ry4an · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The items in everquest can be re-sold and potentially for a profit. The items at FunHi (to my limited understanding) can't be regifted or sold.

    It's makes all the difference in the world. It's why people will buy 'shares' in a company which are esentially vitual property too -- because they're resellable.

  49. What do you mean "like"? by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Interesting
    According to the stories in Gamespot, Ananova, and Breaking News the 40 million plus selling virtual pet is coming back. The Tamagotchi Plus will have a few changes this time around: better screen, more animation sequences, five times more capacity. The big add-on is wireless. Now Tamagotchi will interact will each other and be able to exchange gifts, make friends, have eating contests, or get married and create offspring. (No word on Tamagotchi sex or divorce yet.) Bandai will even have machines in a fast food chain to allow downloading new accessories. (Japan only at first, of course.)

    Since they IR network and transfer data objects, I'm working on an infectious Tamagotchi plague. It's for the children's sake.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  50. VHAT A COUNTRY!!! by Thud457 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Next, we'll have to institute some sort of government standards agency to insure that our beautiful virtual girfriend isn't selling 200%, is really beautiful, and is really a girl!

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  51. Re:Status symbols - $6k piece of rock by nxs212 · · Score: 3, Informative

    mod up!
    Excellent article about DeBeers scumbags
    http://www.theatlantic.com/issues/82feb/ 8202diamon d1.htm

    Wired had an article about artificial/cultured diamonds; decent read.
    http://www.wired.com/wired/archive/11.09/di amond.h tml

    Also, if you care about exploited children in Africa, watch Child Soldiers. It's really depressing; Congo, Angola, Sierra Leone, etc. use diamond money to buy weapons and send kids to war.
    I guess DeBeers' would defend themselves by saying that those kids would otherwise have too much free time on their hands and get in trouble hanging out at schools, playgrounds and working on their families' farms.

  52. Re:Status symbols-Mac Cube by Gilmoure · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I got my wife a Mac Cube and flat screen. Nothing like being married to a computer geek (she's a telecom analyst and loves having Mac DTP and command line tools all together).

    --
    I drank what? -- Socrates
  53. Been Done before / Will be done again by DeanFox · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm showing my age reminding everybody about Pet Rocks.

    People would complain how stupid they were as they stood in line to get one.

    The inventer retired a multi-millionare.

    Strap that Adonomizer to your head and while it zaps your brain repeat... I - will - not - buy - stupid - shit - for - no - reason...

  54. Irony by mabu · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What's really sad is that I bet some of the "high rollas" on this site are actually buying themselves gifts from alternate accounts, or are company shills designed to motivate a much smaller number of legitimate members to compete for more intangible crap.

    Ultimately, you have to respect a venture like this, that can make a person alternate between thoughts of "WTF This is sick" and "Wow, this is genius". It's both interesting & entertaining, and profoudly sad and pathetic as well. What an eloquent microcosm of capitalism, superficiality and materialism.

  55. Re:Why would I pay for this? by hoop33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But how is it rude when I'm specifically asking for this. I don't care if they want to spend $10 or $100. Just drop it in an envelope and exchange giftw with me. No problem.

    It's your presumptuousness that's rude. When people give gifts, they do so because they want to, and want to express themselves through the gift. They're not signing up for some program you set up.